Atlantis is the Sardo Corso Graben Horst underwater continental block submerged by the Meltwater Pulses and destroyed by a subduction zone, Capital is Sulcis
Official Discovery of Atlantis, of the Garden of Hesperides, of the Lake Tritonis, of the Amazons of Myrina, of the Pillars of Heracles
Version 664 The Official Discovery of the Legendary Island of Atlantis by Mr. Luigi Usai
30 agosto 2024
Out of Atlantis theory: the PSCA (Paradigma Sardo Corso Atlantideo) created by the undersigned Dr. Luigi Usai, is evolving to the point of appearing as a new theory, the Out of Atlantis Theory: after about 3 and a half years of solitary studies, the undersigned Luigi Usai is realizing that it almost seems as if the Atlantean people, who populated the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and in particular its paleocoasts, really attempted, as Sonchis of Sais to Solon states, to invade the entire Mediterranean basin, creating colonies in Sicily, Malta, Cyprus, Atlit Yam, Lebanon, Palestine, Mesopotamia, Turkey, Afghanistan and many other lands such as the Canaries and the Azores, as shown in this documentation of over 600 pages. It would seem from my research that Indo-European is the name that linguists have given to Atlantean: a swarm of languages and dialectal variants created in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and spoken by the populations that lived there, who then invaded the Sea forcefully, conquering what they could and exporting obsidian, culture and the vowel U typical of Atlantean languages throughout the Mediterranean, particularly in toponymy, onomastics and local dialects. Customs and traditions are so rooted that today it is impossible to recognize the original proximity of the Panada of Assemini with the Panades made by the Turkish peoples. Everyone is convinced that they invented that type of food. The same thing happens with the Atlantean and post-Atlantean export (that is, after Atlantis was semi-submerged and its two plateaus, Sardinia and Corsica, remained out of the sea to look like isolated islands) of cheese with worms, which in Sardinia today is called Casu Marzu (Rotten Cheese), while in the colonies in France and other places in Europe this cheese with worms underwent modifications and developments, as happens with linguistic mutations, and for example in France the Atlantean Casu Marzu is made with mites instead of cheese worms. In short, the Atlantean uses and customs changed, adapting to the colonies: another example for sociologists and anthropologists are the Atlantean masks of the Mammuthones which in the Basque Country, of Atlantean origin, are called Joaldùn, but are originally from Atlantis. The Basque linguist Eduardo Blasco Ferrer or perhaps another colleague of his thought that Sardinian derived from Basque, but it is exactly the opposite: the Basques were an Atlantean colony, who therefore spoke our language and maintained it, changing it: which explains the toponyms of rivers such as Arantza and Arrexi, which in Sardinian mean Orange and Root. The other hundreds of examples are already ready, studied by world-famous linguists, so the writer Luigi Usai does not need to prove a damn thing: everything has already been demonstrated by Salvatore Dedola, Blasco Ferrer and many other scholars.
Back to the beginning: to explain the missing civilization of the Atlanteans of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, linguistics invented Indo-European. I hope I have done a favor to Science and the Human population. Bye.
The most convincing scientific evidence for the existence of Atlantis has been presented by Dr. Luigi Usai, who has reinterpreted the legendary story in the light of archaeological, geological, geographical, linguistic, historical, oceanographic, onomastic and toponymic evidence. Here is a summary of the main evidence:
0. Libya and Asia are Sardinia and Corsica
Libya and Asia are Sardinia and Corsica.
Scientific sources:
Herodotus, Histories, IVTimaeus, PlatoCritias, PlatoDiodorus Siculus 5.20 Atlantis was larger than Libya and Asia combined, that is, Atlantis was larger than Sardinia and Corsica combined.
1. Catastrophic Event
Usai identifies the catastrophic event described by Plato as the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, which occurred approximately 11,600 years ago.
2. Pillars of Hercules
The ancient Pillars of Hercules were located in Carloforte by Prof. Giorgio Saba, suggesting a different geographical interpretation than Gibraltar. Luigi Usai uses Saba’s discovery of the Pillars of Hercules in Carloforte in his research. The scientific world is therefore wrong when it states that the Pillars of Hercules were in Gibraltar: no, before Gibraltar they were in Carloforte, and they are still there.
3. Elephant Remains
Mammoth skeletons have been found in Sardinia, confirming the presence of large fauna, similar to what was described for Atlantis. When Plato states that “in Atlantis there was the species of elephants” he was therefore talking about the Mammuthus Lamarmorai.
4. Monumental Constructions
The presence of over 7,000 nuraghe in Sardinia and Corsica reflects Atlantean-type construction techniques, as do the Domus De Janas, the Tombs of the Giants, Dolmens, Menhirs, Sacred Wells etc.
5. Toponymy and Hydronymy
The capital of Atlantis, identified with Sulcis, is associated with numerous place names with references to water, suggesting an environment rich in water resources. Acquacadda, Acquafredda, Acqua Callentis, S’Acqua callenti de susu e de Baxiu; Is Sais Superiore e Inferiore in Narcao refer to Sais in Egypt, and Sais is even a Sardinian surname. Acqua and Acquas are Sardinian surnames. In Atlantis there were legumes, and in fact a place is called Nuxis, which means Walnuts, a clear reference to a type of legume. It is incredible how after 11,600 years the toponymy of Sulcis is still full of references to the myth of Atlantis. It has been an authentic miracle that up to now these toponyms have not been changed, or that all these references have been left. In Domusnovas there remains Monte Acqua. The Nuragic wells are proof that the theme of water was sacred to the Atlantean-Nuragic people, to the point that at least one nuraghe was even built directly above a sacred well.
6. Warrior People
Numerous archaeological finds, including bronzes of warriors, indicate a warlike culture similar to that described by Plato. Bronzes of archers, boxers, wrestlers, warriors. Then the discoveries of Mont’E’ Prama: the oldest statuary in the Mediterranean once again features boxers, warriors, archers… in short, the Atlanteans were a warlike people.
7. Geographical Measures
The plain of Atlantis, described by Critias, corresponds to the dimensions of the Sardinian-Corsican block, with a length of approximately 555 kilometers.
8. Archaeological Discoveries
Human remains dating back to about 11,000 years ago have been found in Sardinia, suggesting a temporal connection with the alleged war between Atlantis and Greece. In the Lanaittu cave, remains from 20,000 years ago have been found, long before the fight between Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis and the First Athens (for which we have no historical or archaeological sources at the moment). In fact, Atlantis was ancient for the ancients.
9. Ancient Mines
The Sulcis mines, among the oldest in Europe, attest to the mineral wealth that may have been present in Atlantis. Orichalcum has also been found near Gela, where it is kept in the museum. Orichalcum exists, it is not a fairy tale. Perhaps it was transported from Atlantis to other places. Now, however, it is necessary to recheck the datings, which scientists may have made a mistake in good faith.
10. Military Interests
The installation of NSA military bases in the region raises questions about possible strategic interests related to the history of Atlantis. These evidences suggest that Atlantis is not just a myth, but may have had a concrete historical basis in the Sardinian-Corsican bloc, requiring further studies to fully explore its historical importance.
1. Ancient Geography Revisited
If Libya and Asia were reinterpreted as Sardinia and Corsica, the geography described by Herodotus and other ancient historians would change radically. Herodotus describes Libya as a vast region south of the Mediterranean, corresponding to modern-day Africa. This reinterpretation would require a complete revision of ancient maps and navigation routes. Descriptions of distant and mysterious lands would become references to well-known islands in the western Mediterranean.
2. Reconsideration of Nautical Enterprises
The Phoenician circumnavigation of Africa, as described by Herodotus, would be reinterpreted as a voyage around Sardinia and Corsica. This would significantly reduce the scope and difficulty of the undertaking, changing our perception of the Phoenicians’ nautical capabilities. Instead of an epic crossing of a continent, it would be a relatively short voyage and well within the nautical capabilities of the time.
3. Cultural and Political Implications
The reinterpretation of regions could influence our understanding of cultural and political interactions between ancient civilizations. For example, the relations between Egypt and the surrounding regions would be seen in a new light, with Sardinia and Corsica assuming a central role in the dynamics of the ancient Mediterranean. This could lead to a reassessment of the alliances, conflicts and cultural exchanges between these civilizations.
4. New Perspectives on Economic History
The trade routes and natural resources of the reinterpreted regions would have a different impact on economic history. Sardinia and Corsica, known for their mineral resources, could be seen as more important economic centers than previously thought. This could lead to a new understanding of ancient trade and regional economies.
5. Review of Historical Sources
Accepting this reinterpretation would require a critical review of historical sources. Scholars should reanalyze ancient texts with this new perspective, seeking further evidence to support or refute these theories. This could lead to new discoveries or greater understanding of the intentions and knowledge of ancient historians.
These are just some of the consequences that could arise from accepting this reinterpretation. However, it is important to emphasize that such theories are highly speculative and not widely accepted in the academic community.
If you have any other questions or would like to dig deeper, let me know!
: Herodotus, Histories , Book IV. : Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia , Book VI. : Pausanias, Description of Greece , Book I.
These historical sources are essential to understanding the idea that the Phoenicians, known for their nautical skills, could have completed a circumnavigation of Africa in ancient times.
Note from Luigi Usai in first person:
I have submitted a typescript of approximately 550 pages on the discovery of Atlantis to Scientific Reports so that scientists can peer review it.
I attach a demonstration image for scientists: at the moment I have been asked to PAY to make the publication. It is right that those who work on the text should be paid. But is it right that the discoverer of Atlantis should pay to let the world know the truth he discovered? For this reason, for now, I will not pay. The text of my discoveries, even if not exactly identical, is published online and dismembered in a sort of Dionysian sparagmòs online. However, at the moment it is possible to reconstruct my ideas, even if with the days, months and years they are being improved a lot and I have incredible insights, which leave even myself astonished. I refuse to pay to tell the world what Atlantis is: it is the reverse, I SHOULD BE PAID TO TELL IT. WE ARE THEREFORE FACED WITH A PARADOX, AN OXYMORON . In fact, I am already paying to keep this website up and running, and this is also not right. I am giving a wonderful gift to the world by revealing all this information that no one has ever understood before. I think it is right that society pays me homage and honor for what I am doing.
Luigi Usai says that the Bible is an Atlantean text. Why?
Luigi Usai claims that the Bible is an Atlantean text for several reasons related to his interpretation of ancient texts and the connection between the history of Atlantis and religious traditions. According to Usai, Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, so many of the myths and stories in the Bible are the story of the religion, myth and culture of Atlantis; after the semi-submersion, two plateaus remained of Atlantis above the surface of the water, and we call them Sardinia and Corsica: therefore, perhaps the mountaineers and shepherds and cattlemen survived from Atlantis, exactly as Sonchis of Sais told Solon. Usai suggests that the Bible, especially in its stories of catastrophes and ancient peoples, reflects the collective memory of historical events related to the disappearance of Atlantis. Furthermore, he believes that the biblical texts contain elements that speak of advanced civilizations and lost knowledge, similar to those described by Plato regarding Atlantis. In this context, Usai tries to demonstrate that the Bible is not only a religious text, but also a historical document that could contain information about the culture and society of Atlantis, suggesting that religious and mythological traditions have mutual influences and that the Bible can be seen as a legacy of that lost civilization. Until now we have not understood exactly what the text of the Bible contained. Luigi Usai makes a new biblical exegesis, showing how the text actually speaks of the warrior people of the ISRI, or the WRESTLER. Jacob is renamed ISRAEL, ISRI – EL, WRESTLING with GOD, because “he had wrestled with God” (this story is present in the Bible). Here is the theme of the fight that returns: why? If the God of the Bible is the God of peace and love why does the concept of fight and war always return? Why is the oldest piece of poetry in the Bible the story of LAMECH who tells IN POETRY that he killed a person? Poetize a murder? In the Bible? Why, in oral tradition, does LAMECH, having become blind and led by a child by mistake, kill Cain and when he discovers it, KILLS THE CHILD? Because the Bible is the story of the Atlantean people, violent and warlike, in their passage from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block to the East, through migrations and mixings of the Atlantean and Sardinian-Corsican peoples with the Eastern and later Egyptian peoples, not of the Jewish people as we understand them today, an isolated and autonomous whole. The Jewish people come from the Atlantean block currently semi-submerged in the Mediterranean. We have examples of Atlantean onomastics and toponymy also in Sardinia in the town of ISILI. Let us remember that the Atlantean languages are Semitic, so they were not originally vocalized.Luigi Usai claims that the Bible is an Atlantean text based on a series of personal interpretations of the scriptures and on his theory that Atlantis was the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, partially submerged in the western Mediterranean. Usai believes that many of the biblical stories, such as the Great Flood or the narratives about ancient peoples, are actually references to the Atlantean civilization and the catastrophic events that led to the disappearance of Atlantis. He suggests that the Bible, in this context, is not only a religious document, but also a historical text that transmits the memory of a lost civilization.
Usai develops his theory by arguing that many of the elements and myths described in the Bible, such as the figure of Jacob renamed “Israel” (which he interprets as “wrestler with God”), reflect themes of struggle and war, which would be characteristic of the Atlantean culture. Furthermore, he links the Bible to the cult of the bull, an element that he considers central to the Sardinian-Atlantean culture, finding traces of this cult in various archaeological and toponymic representations in Sardinia.
Usai extends his theory by linking Sardinian onomastics and toponymy to terms and places that he considers to be of Atlantean origin, suggesting that the languages spoken by this civilization were Semitic and not vocalized. He interprets the disappearance of Atlantis as a real historical event, caused by the rise in sea levels, which would have led to the migration of its inhabitants to other regions of the Mediterranean and beyond, giving rise to peoples such as the Sumerians, the Basques, the Hebrews and the Guanches.
In summary, Luigi Usai proposes that the Bible contains traces of the culture and history of Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis, seeing in it a document that, if reinterpreted in the light of his theories, could reveal the true nature and events of this lost civilization.
Introduction to the official discovery of the legendary island of Atlantis
Oh you who are in a small boat,
eager to listen, followed
behind my boat that passes by singing,
come back to review your arguments:
don’t go out to sea, because perhaps,
if you lost me, you would remain lost.
The water I take has never been run;
Minerva breathes, and leads me Apollo,
and nine Muses show me the Bears. (Dante Alighieri)
Atlantis is the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block, namely Haou-Nebout, namely Meropide, CyrneIchnusa : it can be seen perfectly by measuring the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block and its paleocoasts, today called the Sardinian-Corsican continental platform. The elephant species were the Mammuthus Lamarmorai. The mud that surrounded the island? Caused by the erosion of the Sardinian-Corsican continental platform by millennia of undertow. The largest island of all? It’s true, the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is larger than Sicily. Were there the oldest ancient people? It’s true, the Sardinians apparently have always been. Rich in minerals? The Sulcis mines are the oldest in Europe. Is there archaeological evidence that it is Atlantis? Yes, the Sardinian-Corsican geological block has the highest archaeological density in the world. Were they tower builders? Yes, the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans built over 7,000 towers called Nuraghes. Were there white, red and black stones? True, obsidian black Sardinian stone from Monte Arci traded throughout Europe, there is scientific evidence in literature; Red rocks from Arbatax and Carloforte; white rocks? Everywhere in Sardinia. Sardinia is not Atlantis, but only a plateau that emerges from the water, and that sailors interpreted as an island because they did not have bathymetric software to see clearly what was under the sea. The Meropide is a work that talks about the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, but the term Meropide was used instead of Atlantis. Atlantis has been found. The capital is Sulcis. Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican geological block semi-submerged in the Atlantic Ocean thousands of years ago that today is called the Western Mediterranean.
Online you can find all the explanations: it’s right, finally Atlantis has been found, and it shows how the peoples who inhabited the currently submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf migrated to other places, thus creating the myth of the Great Flood and founding new colonies, which today we call Sumerians, Basques and Jews. These three peoples, and perhaps many others (for example those of Gobekli Tepe or the Guanches), are peoples who migrated from the Sardinian-Corsican block when they realized that it was about to be submerged by the constant rise in sea level, called the eustatic level, which had an excursion between 120 and 140 meters, submerging the paleocoasts of Atlantis. The Aztec people came from a sinking island in the Atlantic Ocean: but by Atlantic Ocean they meant the current Western Mediterranean, as already explained, so everything fits perfectly: the Aztecs were an Atlantean migration from the Corsican Sardinian geological block before it was submerged forever, making the world forget that what had happened was true!
In fact, the migrated peoples, like the Sumerians, had their own language and writing, generally of a Semitic nature, and were experts in channeling because this was an Atlantean ability, like that of the Minoans, another Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migration, which explains why they were such an advanced people. The peoples of the sea are therefore the peoples who had migrated from Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis to the rest of the world, probably even the Guanches. The Sardinian-Corsican block is a fragment of continental lithosphere that includes Sardinia, Corsica and their continental platforms. Obsidian, a black stone of volcanic origin, is a natural element often defined as a symbol of Nuragic and pre-Nuragic Sardinia: therefore Nuragic means Atlantean! The term Nuragic was in fact invented from scratch by Giovanni Lilliu, because in his time Atlantis was a legend, and no serious scholar would have believed him if he had said something similar (if he had ever noticed).
There is genetic, tectonic, archaeological, hydrographic, geological, geographical, paleontological, phonological, onomastic, toponymic and linguistic evidence for the existence of Atlantis, which will be listed below on this page. The text will be endlessly corrected, in an attempt to create a readable text for the Scientific Community.
July 18, 2023: I thought I had located the exact position of the Pillars of Hercules, instead (correction of 06/08/2023) I discovered that this information had already been published by Professor Giorgio Saba, author of the text: “Excuse me, where is Hades? Hypotheses on the ancient history of Sardinia” . I contacted Professor Pierluigi Montalbano to communicate my potential discovery, and he informed me that this information had already been discovered and published, even though I had never heard of it before.
Congratulations to Professor Giorgio Saba, official discoverer of the Pillars of Hercules of Carloforte.
The Dear Professor Giorgio Saba has found the real Pillars of Hercules : they are the Faraglione Antiche Colonne of Carloforte, on the Island of San Pietro, in Sardinia (Italy); his discovery is described in the text “ Scusi, dov’è l’Ade? Ipoesi sulla storia antica della Sardegna ”. Official congratulations!
Sulcis is the capital of Atlantis;
Atlantis is not Sardinia: Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican geological block partially submerged for reasons yet to be ascertained; Sardinia is only a plateau of emerged land of the semi-submerged island of Atlantis. When the island was semi-submerged, what remained above water was then known as Sardinia and Corsica. Corsica was the mountainous part north of Atlantis.
There is evidence of a submersion, which occurred on a date yet to be determined;
Solon mentions the length of the plain of Atlantis, which converted into km is 555 kilometers long, and this measurement coincides incredibly with the dimensions of the submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. This is a very interesting detail, because Plato could not have known this measurement since the Sardinian-Corsican block is submerged under the Mediterranean, so this coincidence of measurements is impressive. According to Plato’s descriptions given in Timaeus and Critias, the plain of Atlantis was 3,000 stadia long, which converted into kilometers corresponds to about 555 km. This measurement coincides surprisingly with the dimensions of the submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. This coincidence provides a further clue that supports Luigi Usai’s theory according to which Atlantis could have been the Sardinian-Corsican block.
“Obsidian Studies in the Prehistoric Central Mediterranean: After 50 Years, What Have We Learned and What Still Needs to Be Done?” by Robert H. Tykot 1
“Mediterranean Islands and Multiple Flows” by Robert H. Tykot 2
These sources provide detailed information on the spread of Sardinian obsidian, particularly that from Monte Arci in Sardinia, which travelled for hundreds of kilometres starting from the Early Neolithic 1 . As can be seen from these sources, not only were there white, red and black stones in Atlantis, but there was even a huge trade in black stones, or obsidian, throughout Europe, and we have a lot of documented evidence from scientists and archaeologists who have dedicated part of their lives to this study, allowing us now to have certain and documented evidence of the use of black stones by the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean people. New discovery in the Mediterranean: https://www.ilmessaggero.it/social/capri_scoperta_ossidiana_mare_subacquei-7769811.html blocks of very precious obsidian discovered at the bottom of the sea: «Lost by a Neolithic ship»: all the information seems to slowly converge towards a confirmation of what I stated on this website, a bit like all the information converged with the theory of plate tectonics, and all the new discoveries seemed to confirm the theory, which at first seemed absurd, and later turned out to be true and scientifically founded.
Entry made with the help of Artificial Intelligence, to be rewritten and corrected: there is a lot of evidence of the cult of the bull; among the many, the toponymic presence of the Isola del Toro, the Isola della Vacca; the cult of the bull at the temple of Matzanni; the discovery of many ritual bull heads. I will slowly collect all this evidence in this list entry. There is evidence of the cult of the bull in Sardinia. One of the most important is the presence of bucrania, or bovine protomes, representing the horns of the bull, on many archaeological sites of the island. This symbol is one of the most prolific and long-lasting on the island, continuing during the Chalcolithic until the Bronze Age when the horns of the bull are depicted in relief on the Nuragic tombs 1 . The representation of bulls as sacred animals is extremely ancient and deeply rooted in the collective unconscious. In 15,000 BC, aurochs (the ancestor of our contemporary bulls) were painted in relief in the Lascaux caves, presented in the famous Hall of the Bulls 1 . Bull worship spread throughout the Mediterranean during the Late Chalcolithic, presumably transmitted by sailors on trade routes 1 . The bull was the most present, if not exclusive, animal in the art and religion of Neolithic Sardinia. In a stone amulet found in Bau Porcus, the importance and thaumaturgical value of the bull symbol engraved on it is evident, with the oval-shaped head surmounted by crescent horns, as well as in the bovine protomes sculpted in the hypogeum of Sa Londra in Alghero, both ascribed to the Ozieri culture. From the locality of Bingia Eccia, near Dolianova, comes a tetrapod limestone plate with bull protomes. In the caves of Monte Majore and Sa Ucca ‘e su Tintirriolu, four fragments of vases dating back to the beginning of the third millennium BC were found, depicting the bull in the shape of a crescent moon, or with a trapezoidal head widened at the nostrils, or with a bull’s head, the latter being consistently present in Anghelu Ruju, in the Cagliari area, painted on the architraves of the tombs. But the bull’s heads are found, sculpted or painted, isolated or in pairs, in numerous domus de janas (tombs dug into the rock usually grouped together in necropolises) scattered throughout the Sardinian territory, as a magical and protective symbol of the burials. Not to mention the small bronzes of Sardinian warriors with helmets adorned with horns, sometimes placed vertically, sometimes horizontally. It seems strange that an animal like the bull, so useful in the daily reality of agricultural civilization and at the same time so sacred as to constitute almost a union between the animal and divine nature, was depicted only with the signs of the head and horns instead of the entire body. But this way of offering a part of the animal in a symbolic image is certainly not due to the poor ability of the proto-Sardinian Neolithic craftsman, but rather to a kind of “representation rule” based on ideas and beliefs that acted as a rule for the development of the most remote artistic and religious system of Sardinia. To the long list pertinent to the importance of the bull in Sardinia we can add that according to some scholars in the shape of the “Giants’ Tombs” another taurine symbol could be highlighted: from the large central granite stele in fact branch off two semicircular arms made up of slabs stuck into the ground that would reproduce the shape of the bull’s horns. After the very long period of human history dedicated exclusively to hunting and gathering, we must go back to the rise of pastoral and agricultural civilizations to better understand the meaning of these symbols. In fact, it was the moon that attracted the attention of prehistoric men with its cycles. Our satellite was considered the “personification” of Mother Earth in the sky for its manifest influence on the growth of plants and the outcome of the crops. The waxing and waning phases of its “quarters” reminded ancient populations of the periods of fertility and pregnancy of women.In this sense the Bull-Moon God embodied male fertility also linked to agrarian fertility. The bull has an important symbolic meaning both in the culture of ancient Egypt and in that of ancient Sardinia.
In Egypt , the Apis bull was worshipped as a deity, especially in Memphis. Its cult is documented as early as the 2nd Dynasty, and some think it may date back to the 1st Dynasty. The figure of the bull may have been transmitted to the Egyptians in prehistoric times, a theory that requires further study.
In the culture of Ozieri in Sardinia , the bull or ox was symbolically linked to male fertility and agrarian fecundity. This belief was central to the Copper and Bronze Age civilizations. Taurine symbolism was connected with maternal (and lunar) and paternal (and solar) symbolism.
The Bull God in Sardinia : Giovanni Lilliu describes the cult of the bull in Sardinia, noting the importance of the ox as a partner of the Mother Goddess and protector of the living and the dead. Its aniconic manifestations included large pointed upright stones (menhirs) and bull protomes in underground tombs.
Possible connection between the two cultures : Although there are intriguing parallels between the bull cults in the two regions, there is no direct evidence of a mutual connection or influence. Bull symbolism was common to many ancient cultures, so the similarities could be coincidental or the result of cultural convergence.
In conclusion, bull worship is a fascinating feature of both Egyptian and Sardinian culture, and the similarities between the two may suggest universal themes related to agriculture, fertility, and power. Further research may clarify whether there is a direct connection between these religious practices.
The catastrophe mentioned by Plato was supposed to be the geological phenomenon of partial submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block , caused perhaps by the Slab Roll-Back, by the possible presence of a tectonic fault that passes under Sulcis and continues, on one side towards Gibraltar and on the other towards Pompeii and Herculaneum, and visible using the satellite and bathymetric map of Google Maps, freely available online. Furthermore, in that historical period the Meltwater Pulses also occurred. The era in which the Sardinian-Corsican block was called Atlantis was therefore before 9600 BC. The mud caused by marine erosion and currents made it impossible to sail along the coast of the island, so probably for some centuries the island remained unreachable, thus contributing to making people forget the power of this warlike ancient people. Atlantis has a north-south orientation, as stated by Plato. The northern part is rich in excellent winds for sailing, and in fact between Corsica and Sardinia there is one of the best sailing schools in Europe. The euhemeristic vision was correct: Poseidon was an ancient ruler of the Sardinian-Corsican island when it was still land, later deified. If all this is correct, it means that in the dispute between catastrophists and evolutionists, in relation to the Atlantean themes, the catastrophists were right. At the present time, however, it was not yet clear which of the two factions could be right.
Why are there no archaeological or historical traces of such an advanced and powerful civilization in the Sardinian-Corsican block? Because the population particularly preyed on marine resources, like the two individuals found at the rock shelter Su Carroppu di Sirri, and to do so they lived on the Atlantean paleocoasts, today called the Sardinian-Corsican Continental Platform. Part of the civilization and population that were located on the paleocoasts were submerged and then swept away by about eleven thousand six hundred years of marine currents, which transformed the paleocoasts into the continental platform that now surrounds the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Furthermore, we know from experience that over the years sedimentary deposits are stratified: for example, the Roman remains of about two thousand years ago are potentially found under a few meters of sediment and debris. Therefore, strictly speaking, if a scholar wanted to find the sedimentary layers that contain the remains of the Atlantean civilization, he should do a stratigraphic study that reaches the stratigraphy of 9600 BC, that is, the layer of about 11,600 years ago. The rock shelter Su Carroppu has returned the DNA of two out of three individuals, of a population with DNA almost entirely different from the DNA of the population that subsequently colonized the island of Sardinia three thousand years later. Therefore, we can temporarily hypothesize that the two individuals analyzed at Su Carroppu di Sirri are of the Atlantean population. From this hypothesis, it can be deduced that the Atlanteans, in addition to preying on marine resources and living on the paleocoasts, lived in caves or rock shelters. In Sulcis there are several very ancient caves: the caves of Is Zuddas; the cave of Acquacadda; and other caves that I am not able to list at the moment, but that could slowly be added to this list. Therefore, in order to disprove my theory, it would be enough to carry out stratigraphic analyses in these caves, to demonstrate that they were not inhabited in 9600 BC or earlier. In fact, Plato states that the Atlantean catastrophe dates back to nine thousand years before Solon’s trip to Sais in Egypt, and this trip took place around 590 BC. From these statements, we can also answer another very important question, reported below. If the Atlantean civilization was so advanced and powerful, as Plato says, it should have left traces also on the mainland, not only on the paleocoasts. And in fact, in my opinion, it left traces in the caves around the Atlantean plateau that now emerges from the sea and that was called, by our civilization, by the name of Sardinia. In fact, in the Lanaittu cave, remains from around 20,000 years ago were found, and this is perfectly consistent with the theory of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis. Atlantis was inhabited even 20,000 years ago. In fact, at the present time it seems that Sardinia was inhabited since at least 300.000 years ago. That is why Plato says it was “ancient to the ancients”. And that would also be the reason why the priest of the goddess Neith in Sais told Solon that the Greeks were never old, they were young, and that their mythology was very similar to children’s fairy tales. The priest was trying to explain to Solon that the Greeks had lost the memory of what happened between the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis and the first Athens, because the survivors were not literate and could not write and pass on the memory of what happened around 9600 BC. Everything stated is consistent, as a correct scientific theory should be. So the traces of the Atlanteans, equipped with different DNA already classified by the archaeogenetic studies carried out by the Department of Prehistory of the University of Cagliari together with the University of Florence and Ferrara and published in Scientific Report, must be sought in the rock shelters of all Sardinia and Corsica and in the caves scattered on these two islands, which in reality are plateaus emerged from the sea of the underlying island of Atlantis. Atlantis was one of the names that the Egyptians gave to this island, which in the walls of the temple of Edfu in Egypt is also called Trampling Island, War Island, Peace Island, Egg Island etc. By rereading and analyzing the texts of the temple of Edfu in this key, it is possible to obtain new information on Atlantis and its origins, which seem to be rooted in Egyptian mythology.It is possible to gain new information about Atlantis and its origins, which appear to be rooted in Egyptian mythology.It is possible to gain new information about Atlantis and its origins, which appear to be rooted in Egyptian mythology.
Plato describes Atlantis as an island larger than Libya and Asia together : this is very possible, since at the moment we do not know what the exact size of Libya and Asia was in 9600 BC. So we could proceed with a reverse reasoning: assuming that Plato reported authentic and truthful Egyptian sources, we can therefore deduce that in 9600 BC Libya and Asia were two geographical areas that covered a geographical area smaller than that covered by the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently submerged under the Mediterranean. Furthermore, Libya in 9600 BC may not correspond at all with current Libya nor with the concept of “Africa”. Indeed, the discoveries made by Luigi Usai in Birsa Bank, El Haouaria Bank, in the Sicily-Malta Iblean carbonate continental platform, flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment, show vast territories currently unknown to archaeology and official history, so the Scientific Community still has to clarify what disappeared civilizations they are, whether they are actually submerged buildings and cities; which civilizations they are; why they are submerged; when they were submerged, because of which events. In short, the new discoveries on the Mediterranean seabed open up extremely interesting and innovative scenarios.
There is a great deal of evidence of the existence of Atlantis in the Sardinian-Corsican block: Sardinian archaeologists have stopped to analyze the stratigraphy up to the Nuragic; at the present time it would seem that no one has excavated up to the stratigraphic layers of 9600 BC, thus making it impossible to have archaeological evidence, which therefore has never been sought, as the Sardinian academic world, in its almost total entirety, believed that Atlantis was the fruit of Plato’s imagination, as various archaeologists affirm in many videos and texts published online, for example at the Seminar called “Sa Mesa Archeotunda”.
The evidence of the existence of canals is very strong: in fact there is a canal-port like the one described for Atlantis, and it is the Canal Port of Cagliari; the geography and even the geology of Sulcis show, in an analysis of satellite images, a trend of concentric circles or sections of circles; the geography of the center of Sulcis coincides with Platonic descriptions: sacred woods (even today a good part of Sulcis is made up of woods and natural parks considered so precious that they have been made protected areas by the European Union, and this may be a reason why excavations and core sampling studies have not been carried out to verify the possible presence of underground archaeological finds).
Atlantis was very rich in minerals: and it still is today, let’s imagine how it must have been over 11,600 years ago! The mines of Sulcis are famous throughout Europe, they have a very ancient history and tradition, well known to geologists from all over the world and that does not need to be emphasized further. In Furtei there is still a gold mine that allowed gold to be extracted even a few decades ago; this suggests that in prehistoric times the mine could have been very rich in gold raw material. In Sardinia there are even minerals that are unique in the world, for example Ichnusaite, which takes its name from Ichnussa , the ancient name of Sardinia.
In Plato’s story of Atlantis, a plain adjacent to the city is described that had a perimeter of 2,000 x 3,000 stadia (385 x 580 km or 240 x 360 miles). A stadia is about 185 meters, so the plain had a perimeter of about 370 x 555 km. These are exactly the height and width dimensions of the submerged Corsican Sardinian geological block. This implies that in the past the Atlantean Corsican Sardinians had already managed to measure the exact extension of the island before it ended up submerged under the sea, or if you like, under the Atlantic Ocean, that is, the current Sea of Corsica and Sardinia. The dimension taken in a north-south direction of the currently semi-submerged Corsican Sardinian block is exactly 555 kilometers, and this precision is impressive, and the fact that the dimension is so precise cannot be a coincidence: otherwise on this page hundreds and hundreds of “coincidences” are listed. These are not coincidences, but facts.
Lake Tritonis is the sum of the Lakes, Lagoons and Ponds of Cagliari, Assemini, Elmas, Capoterra, Quartu, Molentargius, Stagno Conti Vecchi; it is yet to be determined whether the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican block has modified the original dimensions of this lake believed to be mythological for millennia; I will analyze the sources slowly, trying to make sense of the ancient texts. Herodotus, Histories 4. 180 (Godley translation) (Greek historian 5th century BC): I cannot say; but I suppose the armor was Egyptian; for I maintain that the Greeks took their shield and helmet from Egypt. As for Athena, they say she was the daughter of Poseidon and Lake Tritonis, and that, for some reason angry with her father, she gave herself to Zeus, who made her his daughter. This is their story. The relations between men and women are promiscuous; they do not live together but have relations like cattle. When a woman’s child is well grown, the men gather together within three months, and the child is judged to be the man he most resembles.” This is their story. The relations between men and women are promiscuous; they do not cohabit but have intercourse like cattle. When a woman’s child is well grown, the men gather together within three months, and the child is judged to be the man he most resembles.” Pseudo-Apollodorus, Bibliotheca 3. 144 (Aldrich translation) (Greek mythographer 2nd AD): “They say that after Athena was born, she was raised by Triton [and presumably Tritonis], who had a daughter named Pallas. Both girls cultivated military life, which once brought them into a contentious dispute. When Pallas was about to strike Athena, Zeus held out his aegis in a shadowy manner, so that she looked up to protect herself, and so she was wounded by Athena and fell. had happened to Pallas, Athena made a wooden image of her, and around her breast she tied the aegis that had frightened her, and placed the statue beside Zeus and paid him honor.” Apollonius Rhodius, Argonautica 4. 1493 ff (Rieu translation) (Greek epic 3rd century BC): “He [Amphitemis son of Apollo and Akakallis (Acacallis)] married the Nymph Tritonis and she bore him two sons, Nasamon and the mighty Kaphauros (Capauros).” Pausanias, Description of Greece 1. 14. 6 (Jones translation) (Greek travelogue C2nd AD): “The Libyans say that the goddess [Athena] is the daughter of Poseidon and the Tritonis lake, and for this reason she has blue eyes like Poseidon.” Pseudo-Hyginus, Fabulae 14 ( Grant translation ) (Roman mythographer 2nd century AD): “On the return voyage [of the Argonauts] Eurybates, son of Teleon, died, and Canto, son of . . ((lacuna)) They were killed in Libya by the shepherd Cephalion, brother of Nasamon, son of the nymph Tritonis and Amphitemis, whose flocks they were plundering.”
Legend has it that the inhabitants of Lake Tritonide stole and hid a tripod of the Argonauts: I have theorized the hypothesis that the tripod mentioned in the legend of the Argonauts was actually hidden by the Sardinians after the arrival of the Argonauts in the area. This tripod could have been a precious or sacred artifact that aroused the interest of the Sardinians, leading them to copy its stylistic technique to produce local tripods. It is therefore possible that there was not only a linguistic and cultural contamination between Greeks and Sardinians, but even an artistic and stylistic one. It is possible that among the fragments of tripods in Greek and Cypriot style found by Sardinian archaeologists, there is even some fragment or part of the tripod mentioned in the legend.
The Atlas Mountains mentioned by Herodotus in his Histories in Chapter IV are the Sulcis Mountains ;
Libya mentioned by Herodotus in his Histories in Chapter IV is an area of the current Province of Cagliari;
It is to be verified that the Cyrene named by Herodotus could be Cyrne: from Treccani: ” cirnènse adj. – rare syn. of corso (of Corsica), taken from the Greek name of the island Κύρνος (in Latin Cyrnos or Cyrne ): the cirnensi dialects “. Is Cyrene Cyrne, that is, Corsica? If Libya is the current province of Cagliari, is Cyrene Corsica? Is Cyrenaica Corsica? Cyrne – Cyrene?
The “elephant species” widely present on Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis is the Mammuthus Lamarmorae, today also known as the Sardinian Dwarf Elephant;
The Atlantic Ocean for Herodotus and Sonchis of Sais is the Sea of Sardinia and Corsica and other seas of the Mediterranean, but not all of the Mediterranean: only a subset of it; we are therefore able to make an approximate historical dating: Solon’s journey to Sais can be placed around 590 BC; Herodotus of Halicarnassus lived in the 5th century BC. We can therefore deduce that in the 6th and 5th centuries BC in Egypt and Greece the Sea of Corsica and the Sea of Sardinia were still called “Atlantic Ocean” by some Mediterranean scholars. We can therefore deduce that something happened later that forced a change in geographical nomenclature. At the present time, on 08/17/2023, I still have not understood what happened. Why was the name of the Atlantic Ocean, or the Sea of Atlantis, changed? At the moment, I believe that as Rome’s power grew, the old name of the Mediterranean Ocean became unbearable for the Roman Senate: probably the Senate proposed at some point a Damnatio Memoriæ. Currently these statements are still experimental, because I am not a historian, so I do not have the cognitive structure necessary to formalize these ideas in a scientific way. I hope that some scholar will want to help me in this enormous difficulty of mine, by putting my ideas to the test, as happens when you run the benchmarks of a software product.
The mud that surrounded the Sardinian-Corsican island of Atlantis is due to the erosion of the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts by the surf ; this erosion caused the generation of the so-called submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental platform;
Among other toponymic analyses, we can analyze the Sardinian toponym of Tharros. “Tharros (in Latin Tarrae, in ancient Greek Thàrras, Θάρρας ) is an archaeological site in the province of Oristano, located in the municipality of Cabras, in Sardinia”. In Greek, Θάρρας means “courage”. If it is true that the Sardinian-Corsican block ended up semi-submerged under the sea, or under the Atlantic Ocean, as it was then called, then it is not surprising that the population that remained to live on the shores of the sea called their city “courage”, because it takes courage to live in a city on the sea after the entire Sardinian-Corsican island has semi-sunk. Of course, I can’t know the exact reason why they called Tharros “courage”, but this is the best interpretation I have been able to give of the toponymy, at the moment (11/08/2023). Sardinia has a complex and stratified history, which reflects the various peoples and cultures that have influenced it over the millennia. The Greek presence in Sardinia, although not as extensive as in other parts of the Mediterranean, has left some traces, even in the toponymy. Here are some Sardinian places that have toponymic origins linked to ancient Greek culture:
Olbia : Located in the north-east of Sardinia, the name “Olbia” means “lucky” or “happy” in ancient Greek. The city was an important commercial center in ancient times and maintained contacts with the Greek world.
Nora : This ancient city, located near Pula in the southern part of the island, has pre-Nuragic and Punic origins, but also links with the Greek world. Some inscriptions found in Nora are in the Phoenician alphabet but in the Greek language.
Tharros : Another ancient center located in the western part of the island, near Oristano. Although Tharros is most commonly associated with the Phoenicians and Romans, there have been discoveries of ceramics and other objects of Greek origin.
Sulcis : The Sulcis region, in south-west Sardinia, had contacts with the Greek world, especially through the nearby colony of Cyrene (in Sardinian Libya). Although the name “Sulcis” is probably of Semitic origin, the Greek presence in the region is attested by various archaeological finds.
Pistis : As you said, “Pistis” is both a Sardinian surname and the name of a place in Sardinia. In Greek, “Pistis” represents faith, trust or reliability. Although there is no concrete evidence, it is interesting to note this toponymic connection.
Musei : A place in Sardinia that bears a name reminiscent of the “Muses,” the Greek deities of music, art, and science. Again, it is difficult to establish with certainty a direct connection between the name of the town and Greek mythology, but the connection is intriguing.
Neapolis : This name, which in Greek means “new city”, is a rather common toponym in the ancient world. The presence of a “Neapolis” in Sardinia could suggest the foundation or refoundation of a city in a period of Greek influence or during a period in which Greek was a prestigious and cultural language.
Calasetta : Although the name “Calasetta” is not directly of Greek origin, the history of the town is linked to the colonization by families from Tabarka, an island off the coast of Tunisia. And Tabarka, in turn, had roots in the ancient Greek city of Kalè Aktè.
These toponymic connections provide fascinating clues to the complex web of interactions between Sardinia and the ancient Mediterranean world. However, it is always important to do thorough research and look at the historical and archaeological context to confirm any theory or hypothesis about the derivation and meaning of these names.
It is important to note that, although there are traces of Greek influence in Sardinia, it is currently believed that the island had deeper interactions with other cultures such as the Nuragics, the Phoenicians, the Carthaginians, and the Romans. Therefore, while there are some places with names of Greek origin, it is still believed by scholars that they represent only a small fraction of the rich toponymic tapestry of the island.
Here are some additional Sardinian toponyms that could have Greek origins:
Kalaris : This name may derive from the Greek word “kályx”, meaning “cup” or “chalice”, perhaps referring to the shape of Cagliari’s natural harbour. Tiana : This name may derive from the Greek word “tíanos”, meaning “elongated” or “extended”, perhaps referring to the shape or position of the city. Pirri : This name may derive from the Greek word “pyrrós”, meaning “red” or “fire-coloured”, perhaps referring to the colour of the soil or rocks in the area. Monte Astili : This name may derive from the Greek word “ástylos”, meaning “without columns” or “unadorned”, perhaps referring to a simple or unadorned architectural style in the area. Tiscali : This name may derive from the Greek word “skális”, meaning “stairway” or “step”, perhaps referring to a steep or terraced landscape in the area. Zinnias (Zinnigas) : This name may derive from the Greek word “skínos”, meaning “rush” or “reed”, probably referring to a marshy or swampy area in the region. These are just a few possible interpretations of Sardinian toponyms that may have Greek origins. Toponymy is a complex field and it is always important to do thorough research and consider multiple sources and interpretations before drawing conclusions about the origins and meanings of place names.
Sardinia is indeed a place of great archaeological interest, and the presence of submerged sites, such as Nora and the port of Melqart, adds a further level of mystery and fascination to the island.
Nora is one of the most important archaeological sites on the island and represents a fundamental testimony of the Phoenician-Punic and Roman presence in Sardinia. It is impossible not to notice that the word “Nora” has a certain phonetic similarity with “Norax”, who in Greek mythology is a giant founder of Nora and son of Hercules, although it could simply be a coincidence. The presence of submerged cities in the Mediterranean, such as Nora or Thonis-Heracleion in Egypt, is evidence of ancient cataclysms and geological changes that have modified the coastline over the millennia. At the time of my last knowledge (2021), Nora has indeed undergone archaeological research, but the resources devoted to the study of submerged cities in the Mediterranean are often limited, and may not be at the level of what we see in other sites, such as Thonis-Heracleion.
The submerged port of Melqart represents another significant example of the archaeological wealth of Sardinia and its connection with the Phoenician-Punic world. The connection between this port and Hercules is fascinating and could represent a link between myth and reality.
The other sites mentioned, such as Porto Flavia or the various caves, even if not submerged, are of great historical and cultural interest and further enrich the history of the island.
On the hypothesis that Sardinia could be somehow linked to the legend of Atlantis, it is important to remember that the story of Atlantis narrated by Plato has generated countless theories and speculations throughout the world, and so far so much concrete evidence has never been found that links the Sardinian-Corsican geological block to the ancient lost civilization. However, research continues, and new discoveries could always bring new information.
In any case, it is essential to continue to protect, study and enhance these sites, both to understand their history and to preserve their beauty and cultural value. It would be interesting to see greater investment by local and international authorities in more in-depth research on these sites and to present them to the public in a complete and integrated context.
Among the archaeological evidence of the submersion of Sulcis , in addition to the submersion of Nora, we have the submersion of the submerged Port of Melqart of Malfatano. The submerged port of Melqart, located near Porto Pino in Teulada, is one of the greatest archaeological wonders of Sardinia. It is considered the largest port in the ancient Mediterranean and was used by the Phoenicians, the Carthaginians and the Romans. The port was described by the Greek geographer Ptolemy in the 1st century AD as Portus Erculi, dedicated to the god of navigation. It could accommodate up to 400 ships and its ancient grandeur is evidenced by the walls that tower just two meters below the surface of the water, among schools of fish and dancing algae. The fact that it was called Portus Erculi implies that this toponym could be a confirmation of the passage of the figure of Hercules, until now considered mythological, in these places. As explained elsewhere on this website, Hercules is linked to Sulcis and Southern Sardinia also because of the story of the Garden of the Hesperides. According to some archaeologists, the roadstead that opens up in front of Capo Malfatano – whose name derives from the Arabic toponym ‘Amal Fatah’, or place of Hope – was the base of the Carthaginian military fleet that controlled the western Mediterranean until 146 BC, the year in which the Romans won the last Punic War and took over everything, perhaps up to the Strait of Gibraltar. The true story of that era has yet to be reconstructed and told, but in the meantime you can immerse yourself in the discovery of this mysterious site among the remains of buildings, roads and docks. In addition to Nora, Sulcis also features the submerged port of Malfatano dedicated to Hercules. Archaeological evidence is starting to become more and more numerous and consistent with the story that Atlantis is the half-submerged Corsican Sardinian block. Archaeologists already have a lot of evidence at their disposal. A submerged coastal city and port? It means that they were previously on dry land, and therefore it means that southern Sardinia is subject to submersion. It is therefore not surprising that at a certain point a more violent submersion than the others may have occurred that sank many kilometers of coasts under the sea, killing all the prehistoric populations that lived on the coasts feeding on seafood and hunting and fishing. The story of Atlantis, which seemed like a mythological tale, now takes on much more credible and probable contours, the archaeological evidence is evident and clear to those who know how to interpret it. Even the toponym of Porto di Ercole at Capo Malfatano is a further confirmation of what is stated on this website.
In addition to Nora and the port of Ercole at Capo Malfatano, there are several other submerged structures in Sardinia . Some of these include:
Porto Flavia : Porto Flavia is an ancient mining port located on the southwestern coast of Sardinia, near Masua. It was built in the late 19th century to transport ore extracted from the surrounding mines. Much of the structure was carved into the rock, with galleries and tunnels extending below sea level. Although not completely submerged, it is a unique structure that links the region’s past mining activity with the sea.
Is Zuddas : These are the Is Zuddas Caves, located in Sulcis-Iglesiente, a region in the southwest of Sardinia. These caves are famous for their limestone formations and stalactites. Even though they are not submerged, they represent a very interesting cave system that could have played a role in prehistoric life and local imagination. It is in fact possible that the karst phenomenon played a very important role in ancient civilizations. Among the various hypotheses that I can venture, when Orpheus searches for Eurydice it is possible that he entered a cave system like those of Is Zuddas in Sulcis. Perhaps they were considered the Hades. Or perhaps the Sardinians made fun of the Greeks, making fun of them, telling them lies to make them appear stupid and incompetent or perhaps gullible. In this sense, my vision for the moment diverges from the statements of Giorgio Saba who, if I am not mistaken, places Hades in the area of Sant’Antioco, if I have understood correctly (I refer the reader to study his work entitled: “Excuse me, where is Hades? Hypotheses on the ancient history of Sardinia”).
Porto Conte : It is located near Alghero and was a Phoenician-Punic port. Archaeological remains and submerged port structures have been discovered in the bay of Porto Conte, suggesting trade and maritime exchanges in the past.
Grotta dei Cormorani : This is a submerged cave located in Cala Gonone, on the east coast of Sardinia. The cave is accessible only by scuba diving and features spectacular limestone formations.
Neptune’s Grotto : Although not completely submerged, Neptune’s Grotto is a series of spectacular coastal caves accessible by sea or by a staircase carved into the rock. They are located near Alghero and are famous for their stalactites and stalagmites.
Grotta del Bue Marino : Also located in Cala Gonone, this cave has been used in past centuries by sea oxen, a type of monk seal. The cave contains a series of interesting tunnels and galleries.
Many of these facilities require access by scuba diving or boat, and some may be subject to restrictions or regulations for the conservation of cultural and natural heritage.
Among the archaeological evidence, there are many more than 7000 nuraghes scattered throughout Sardinia, sacred wells, giants’ tombs and many other structures including Dolmen, Menhirs, Domus de Janas…there are many interesting archaeological discoveries in Sardinia. The island has a rich history dating back thousands of years and there are numerous archaeological sites and structures that provide valuable information about the past. Some of the most famous archaeological sites in Sardinia include the ancient megalithic buildings called nuraghe, which were built between 1900 and 730 BC. There are almost 7,000 nuraghes left standing in Sardinia, and some of the largest and most impressive include Su Nuraxi di Barumini and the Nuraghe di Santu Antine. In addition to the nuraghes, there are also several ancient cities in Sardinia that are worth visiting. These include Tharros, which is located on the west coast of Sardinia, and Nora, which is located on the south coast of the island. Both of these cities have a rich history and offer visitors a glimpse into the past. Other interesting archaeological sites in Sardinia are the statues of Mont’e Prama, the Tomb of the Giants, the Nuragic Village of Tiscali and the Necropolis of Tuvixeddu in Cagliari. These sites provide valuable information about the history and culture of Sardinia and are well worth a visit.
Among the possible other evidence of a submersion of the Corsican Sardinian block in the current Mediterranean Sea, there is the presence of many submerged cities. These cities were once built on dry land: this implies a sinking event within the current Mediterranean Sea: therefore not only the Corsican Sardinian geological block sank, but many cities, villages and inhabited centers, in various historical periods. It is therefore possible that this sinking activity is still ongoing today, with all the risks and dangers that derive from it. Here is a list of some submerged cities in the Mediterranean: Pavlopetri, Greece Baia, Italy Olous, Greece Dolchiste, Turkey Atlit Yam, Israel Heracleion, Egypt
Comparison with other Studies : My analysis could gain strength by comparing my conclusions with other scientific studies or archaeological research on Sardinia and the legends of Atlantis. I will therefore create a special session called homonymously: Comparison with other Studies.
Sardinian Atlantean Contacts with the Rest of the World : Here is an interesting excerpt from the Archaeology Odyssey article “Stone Villages: The Bronze Age Nuraghe of Sardinia” by Robert H. Tykot ( https://www.baslibrary.org/archaeology-odyssey/6/2/3 ). The article discusses the history of Sardinia during the Bronze Age and how it was once thought to be isolated from the vibrant cultures of the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean. However, decades of archaeological research have shown that the Bronze Age Sardinians not only maintained contact with the Minoans and Mycenaeans, but may have also moved into the Middle East. Many scholars identify a people called the Shardana, mentioned in a number of Egyptian texts, as the Shardana. Pharaoh Ramesses II complained that the Shardana “came boldly with their warships from the midst of the sea, none being able to withstand them.” It is fascinating to learn about the history and culture of Sardinia during this period! Remains of what appears to be a sort of Nuragic village right in the land of Israel around the 12th century BC have been found on Mount Carmel http://luna.cas.usf.edu/~rtykot/NPR9%20-%20Arch%20Odyssey.pdf The Nahal Me’arot / Wadi el-Mughara caves are located on the western slopes of the Mount Carmel range and include the Tabun, Jamal, el-Wad and Skhul caves. These caves have been the subject of archaeological research for over 90 years and have revealed a cultural sequence of unparalleled duration, providing an archive of early human life in Southwest Asia. The 54-hectare property contains cultural deposits representing at least 500,000 years of human evolution, demonstrating the unique existence of both Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans within the same Middle Paleolithic, Mousterian, cultural framework. Evidence of numerous Natufian burials and early stone architecture represents the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to agriculture and animal husbandry. Consequently, caves have become a key site in the chronological-stratigraphic framework for human evolution in general and for the prehistory of the Levant in particular. My purely speculative hypothesis is that these places were ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean colonies in Lebanon/Palestine/Israel, i.e. in present-day Asia Minor. I therefore assume, on a theoretical level, that in the future, more and more Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean settlements will be found on these lands. In my opinion, it is only a matter of time and of improving research tools, such as satellite archaeology and the massive use of Lidar for the discovery of new remains and ancient settlements.
The Syrtes mentioned in ancient texts:The word “Sirte” comes from the Latin “Syrtis”, which in turn comes from the ancient Greek “Σύρτις” (Súrtis). This term referred to two large sandbanks off the coast of Libya, which at this site is the province of Cagliari in modern-day Sardinia, and not Libya in Africa. Greater Sirte or Syrtis Major is the Latin name for the Gulf of Sirte, a body of water in the Mediterranean Sea on the coast of Libya, while Lesser Sirte or Syrtis Minor is the Latin name to this day given to the Gulf of Gabès, a body of water in the Mediterranean Sea on the eastern coast of Tunisia. But rereading Herodotus and reinterpreting the term Libya as “province of Cagliari”, then the Syrtis could become the Gulf of Cagliari and the Gulf of Sant’Antioco in Sardinia. “Σύρτις” (Súrtis) is an ancient Greek word that refers to two large shallow gulfs on the coast of Libya. These gulfs were known to be full of shoals and sandbanks, making it difficult for ships to navigate. Until now it was believed that the Great Syrtis, or Syrtis Major, was located on the northern coast of African Libya, while the Little Syrtis, or Syrtis Minor, was located on the eastern coast of Tunisia. This is wrong and this is why until today an aura of mystery has hovered over the places near the Syrtes, namely Lake Tritonis and the Garden of the Hesperides, which were impossible to find until today because people were looking in African Libya and Tunisia rather than where they actually were, namely in the current province of Cagliari in Sardinia. Furthermore, “Σύρτις” can also mean “destruction” or “ruin” in ancient Greek. This metaphorical meaning comes from the difficulty of navigating these gulfs due to the drag towards the shore. However until today, there is no historical evidence to suggest that these gulfs were associated with destruction or ruin in a literal sense. They were important trade routes for ancient Greek navigators and other peoples of the Mediterranean. As already explained in other parts of this website, the Sardinian-Corsican block was surrounded by mud, and the paleocoasts had a very shallow sea, after the semi-submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, so the Greek ships that arrived in the Gulf of Cagliari ran aground. It is very interesting to note that there is still a legend linked to the Church of Bonaria in Cagliari, which speaks of a ship that ran aground in the Gulf of Cagliari. My statements are continually confirmed in the real world, in the stories, traditions, languages and dialects of the place, even in the toponymy. The Basilica of Nostra Signora di Bonaria in Cagliari is a very important place of worship in Sardinia, with a centuries-old history that has its origins in legend. According to legend, on March 25, 1370,a ship was hit by a violent storm and to survive it was forced to throw all its cargo into the sea, including a heavy wooden chest. Despite the storm, the chest did not sink and the sailors invoked the Madonna. The storm subsided and the chest reached the port of the city of Cagliari and ended its journey at the foot of the hill of Bonaria 1 2 . The friars opened the chest and found a statue of the Virgin Mary with the Child Jesus in her arms, holding a candle in her hand that remained lit despite the sea voyage 1 . This statue became known as Our Lady of Bonaria and became the object of worship of the faithful who climb the steps on either side of the altar to venerate her 2 . Reading this story, which dates back to 1370 AD, brings to mind that thousands and thousands of years before it was possible and understandable that an ancient Greek ship could run aground on the seabed of the cities and villages that arose in Cagliari on Lake Tritonide. But since Christianity did not exist, while in 1370 religious superstition generated the cult of the Madonna of Bonaria in Cagliari, in prehistory it generated the stories, handed down for millennia, of the Argonauts, of Lake Tritonide and of the tripod given by Greek sailors to the Sardinians in exchange for hospitality, it generated the story of the Syrtes, of the Atlas Mountains and of the Garden of the Hesperides.
The Edict of the Closures: Impacts on the Territorial Management and the Sardinian Archaeological Heritage:In the 19th century, Sardinia saw the promulgation of the Edict of the Chiudende, a landmark decree that profoundly affected the dynamics of land ownership and management on the island. Prior to this edict, Sardinian lands were generally collectively owned, used by shepherds and farmers for agriculture and grazing. However, with its introduction, a new order was established, allowing private entities to demarcate and assert ownership over land. Despite the potential interpretation of the edict as a tool for agricultural modernization and consolidation of private property, it triggered devastating consequences for Sardinian archaeological heritage. The most lamented aspect of this transition was the uncontrolled use of historical materials, especially those deriving from the nuraghe: extraordinary megalithic towers, distinctive symbols of the prehistoric culture of the island. Countless landowners, in the construction of fences or buildings, had the opportunity to appropriate materials from the nuraghe, compromising the integrity of these ancient structures. This practice not only led to the reduction or elimination of many of these historical testimonies, but also precluded archaeologists from analyzing them in their original context. The original number of available archaeological structures decreased considerably. The erosion of the heritage did not end there. During the excavation works related to the fence or other building initiatives, several residents probably came across buried archaeological artefacts: from bronze figures, to ceramic artefacts, to metal ingots, up to statues of considerable value. Many of these discoveries, rather than being reported to the competent authorities, were possibly kept secret or sold, depriving specialists and the community of a full understanding of their meaning and value. One can imagine that the unauthorized marketing of these finds fueled a black market, with Sardinian artefacts finding their way into the collections of enthusiasts around the world, eluding the opportunity for proper cataloguing and study. In fact, the archaeological sensitivity we have today is not the same as that we had in the past: for example, in Sardinia we have evidence of at least one Pope who gave the order to demolish series of very ancient Menhirs, as they were considered instruments of worship of pagan deities. Once again, here is the Christian religion that tried to destroy the old Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean cults, as they were considered pagan and the fruit of the Devil. In short, although the Edict of the Chiudende was intended to modernize agricultural practices and land rights in Sardinia, its repercussions on the archaeological heritage were profoundly negative.The defacement and looting of Sardinian monuments and artifacts embody a persistent shadow in the island’s cultural history, a reminder of the balance between innovation and preservation.
The Amazons of Myrina founded a city on Lake Tritonis : therefore the Amazons of Queen Myrina lived in the Province of Cagliari; in partial confirmation of this all the studies of centuries on the fact that in Sardinia there was a matriarchal civilization; further proof of the existence of female warriors in the past is obtained from research in the Isles of Scilly. Recent archaeological discoveries in the Isles of Scilly, off the coast of Cornwall, have brought to light the remains of an Iron Age female warrior. The tomb, located on the island of Bryher, contained a sword and a mirror, objects that suggest that the buried woman was a high-ranking warrior. The discovery has been described as “extraordinary” and “unprecedented” by archaeologists who worked on the site. The tomb has been dated to around 200 BC and represents one of the few archaeological evidences of the existence of female warriors in antiquity. This discovery offers new perspectives on the lives of women in antiquity and their participation in military activities. It may also provide further insight into the legends of the Amazons, a group of female warriors described in Greek mythology. Sources: BBC News, The Guardian.
The Hesperides Islands (in Latin: Hesperidum Insulae) are islands in the Atlantic Ocean (that is, the sea around Sardinia and Corsica until at least the 5th century BC as evidenced by the writings of Herodotus and the statements of Sonchis of Sais) ; in classical tradition the Hesperides Islands are probably all the islands encountered before reaching the Pillars of Hercules in Carloforte, in particular Sardinia and all the small islands such as Sant’Antioco, Carloforte, Isola dei Cavoli, Serpentara, to name a few. They are also known by the name of Islands of the Ladies of the West because the Amazons, or Ladies of the West, lived there, on Lake Tritonide of Cagliari and its province, up to the current Capoterra.
Possible causes of the sinking of Atlantide Sardo Corsa could be at least three , according to my autonomous and independent reflections: the slab roll back of geological settlement of the Sardinian Corsican island Atlantidea ; the Meltwater Pulses, in particular perhaps the Meltwater Pulse 1b ; I hypothesized the presence under the Sulcis of a Wadati-Benioff zone that starts at least from the Strait of Gibraltar and reaches at least as far as Pompeii and Herculaneum, passing under the Sulcis. This fault, activated in the past, could have caused earthquakes, tidal waves and various destructions, because the epicenter is located right under the Sulcis; therefore even small earthquakes could have been devastating because they were positioned right under the inhabited, populated area. This fact could also have caused the sinking of Mount Atlas where Poseidon and Cleito built the center of the Capital of Atlantis. The sinking of the mountain may have been interpreted by the populations as a divine punishment for the arrogance of the Atlanteans, that is, for the arrogance of the Sulcitans. The ridiculous thing is that today Sulcis is the poorest area in all of Italy. This is truly a paradox: the Capital of Atlantis in prehistory, today become the poorest area in all of Italy. The date of the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis has not yet been precisely defined, so in reality the Meltwater Pulses may not be implicated in the submersion process . From a geological point of view, there are also at least two points to keep in mind: the geological structure of Graben-Horst of various parts of the Sardinian-Corsican territory, in particular of Campidano ; secondly the karst phenomenon of dolines typical of Sulcis: a violent influx of water could have created immense damage due to the karst of the place, all to be explored and studied.
the current Corsica was the mountainous part north of Atlantis ; today it appears as an island because it was submerged, it is an optical illusion. Corsica and Sardinia were mountain terraces of the island of Atlantis, so after the catastrophic partial submersion they remained out of the water, and today we believe that they are two islands, detached, separate, but this is absolutely not true;
the Sulcis Mountains were called the Mountains of Atlas , and took their name from the son of Poseidon called Atlas, the first of 5 pairs of twins, therefore the first of 10 brothers;
Fruttidoro of Capoterra is the Garden of the Hesperides; The Garden of the Hesperides gave golden fruits, and was located at the extreme borders of the known earth; an analogy with the apparently mythological tale of the Hesperides has been detected in Sardinian toponymy: in fact, there is a place called Fruttidoro, located in the town of Capoterra, in Sardinia. Capoterra, from the Sardinian Caputerra, then in Latin “Caput Terrae”, is the “cape of the Earth”, or the extreme edge known in antiquity (Paleolithic/Mesolithic, around 11,600 years ago, to have an approximate but useful date for understanding), while the current location of Fruttidoro in Capoterra would be the legendary Garden of the Hesperides. This new discovery has not yet been validated by scholars, nor have stratigraphies been carried out for its relative counter-verification, however in the Nuraghe Antigori of Sarroch archaeological finds have been found that confirm these hypotheses in an important way: from Wikipedia we learn that “ The excavations returned various Nuragic and Mycenaean ceramics (coming from Argolis , Crete , and Cyprus [1] ) of the Mycenaean III B and Mycenaean III C type dating back respectively to the 14th – 13th and 13th – 12th centuries BC, testifying to the important exchanges that took place between the Nuragic and Mycenaean civilizations “. Mycenaean pottery is the ceramic tradition associated with the Mycenaean period in ancient Greece, which lasted from 1550 to 1050 BC. It included a variety of styles and shapes, including the stirrup vase, and was strongly influenced by the Minoan precedents based on Crete. Mycenaean pottery typically displays stylised representations of marine and plant life and shows an affinity for minimalist linear designs, a trend that would influence early Archaic and Classical Greek pottery from the 9th century BC. Wheel-made Mycenaean pottery (1550–1450 BC) from mainland Greece has been described as “provincial Cretan”, meaning that although it was produced in mainland Greece, it was strongly influenced by Minoan pottery. Further possible confirmation of the Garden of the Hesperides at Frutti d’Oro di Capoterra is the fact that the author MR Manunza has written about Nuragic and Mycenaean artefacts along a Bronze Age road at Bia ‘e Palma, Selargius (CA) 1 . Furthermore, there is an article by Donatella Salvi on Archaic faience from the Bia ‘e Palma well at Selargius 2. So the contacts between ancient Sardinians and Mycenaean populations are clearly demonstrated by archaeological and historical data, as well as by the artefacts found that demonstrate a relationship between these peoples. It is therefore not a question of fantasy, but there is concrete, historical, archaeological evidence and documentation from well-known professionals. The evidence to support this hypothesis is therefore numerous and delocalised in several geographical points of southern Sardinia: there is evidence of contacts between Sardinia and the eastern Mediterranean during the Bronze Age. For example, Mycenaean pottery has been found in a Nuragic environment 1 . After 1200 BC, with the economic and political collapse of the palace cultures in Mycenae and Crete, only the Cypriots continued trade with Sardinia 1 . Yes, the Nuragic civilisation was not isolated and closed, but fully integrated into the dynamics of commercial and cultural exchanges that characterised life in the Mediterranean in that period. One of the civilisations with which the Nuragic Sardinians had certainly established a relationship of systematic and intense commercial and cultural exchanges was that of the Mycenaeans, interested in the metal trade. Evidence of such relationships has been found in Sardinia in the form of several significant ceramic finds. Well known are the fragments of Mycenaean pottery found in the nuraghe Antigori, significantly located on the southern coast of Sardinia, near Sarroch, but also the so-called “alabastron” found in the nuraghe Arrubiu in Orroli . Equally important and interesting is the ivory head of Mitza Purdia (Decimoputzu) which depicts a character with a helmet completely analogous to those described in Homeric works as typical of Achaean warriors. This evidence suggests that the Nuragic Sardinians had established a relationship of systematic and intense commercial and cultural exchanges with the Mycenaeans, who were interested in the metal trade. Therefore, there is a greater probability that the legend or myth of the Garden of the Hesperides is nothing more than the result of the first contacts between these populations.
If all this were to prove correct, as is now clear to the writer, it means that at least three Sardinian women from Capoterra were called Hesperides. But then what was this mythological Garden? Is it a structure? Of what nature? Will it be possible, by performing core sampling and stratigraphy, to find Neolithic, Mesolithic or Paleolithic remains that can validate that structures, peoples, and civilians were present thousands of years ago? Why Hesperides? Why the name Hesperides? And what really happened?
Rereading the myth of the Garden of the Hesperides now with this new information, it would seem that an ancient Greek man named Hercules headed towards the beach of Frutti d’Oro in Capoterra, docked and established some form of relationship with the inhabitants of Capoterra. The myth says that his goal was to steal three golden apples. Today, however, we can only speculate: was it an orange tree? Oranges did not exist in Greece, and so Hercules was sent to steal three oranges so he could then plant them in Greece and grow them independently?
How was Hercules welcomed by the inhabitants of Capoterra? In friendship? Why aren’t the men named, but the dragon Ladone? What was this dragon coiled around the tree? Did the people of Capoterra give him and his sailor friends something to drink? Did they offer them fruit from a garden to feed them because they risked getting scurvy on ships? Did they offer him lemons to cure scurvy? Or what could these “golden fruits” be? Was there really a tree with golden fruit hanging from it, perhaps dedicated to some deity, or were these fruits only golden in color? Was it really an apple tree? But then the golden variety of the apple existed only in Capoterra, and did the Greeks “steal” it to plant it in Greece? If this episode has been passed down through the millennia, perhaps it contains some very important information: why was Hercules sent to “steal” from the Golden Fruits of Capoterra? What exactly was he supposed to steal? A variety of fruit that existed only in Capoterra? This type of philosophical-scientific investigation also requires the contribution of expert botanists, so it is not easy to solve. The paleogeographic part already required combining hundreds of pieces of information from different disciplines.
While the potential discovery, supported by the claims of ancient historians, is extraordinary and jaw-droppingly astonishing, it nevertheless raises many more questions than it answers.
Hercules in Capoterra in present-day Sardinia. But was it already Sardinia or was it still the legendary Sardinian-Corsican island currently semi-submerged? When Hercules landed in Capoterra had the Sardinian-Corsican geological block already sunk?
The Garden of the Hesperides was located in the Atlantic Ocean (Paleolithic), which as explained on the website atlantisfound.it , was the Paleolithic/Mesolithic name of the sea that surrounded the island, then emerged land of Sardinia-Corsican-Atlantean. The Hesperides Islands must therefore have been the archaic names with which Sardinia and Corsica were defined in the millennia following the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Hesperidum Insulae, “The Islands of the Evening”, because at sunset, when the Greeks looked towards the West, sailing in that direction from their most remote position, most likely the island of Ischia, they saw 2 distant islands, which today are known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica, and which are plateaus of emerged land of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The linguist and glottologist Massimo Pittau analyzed the location of the Garden of the Hesperides, placing it presumably in Sardinia and pointing out that it was in any case a legend; I, however, in my bold ignorance, go further and propose that it is not a legend, but a place that really existed located in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, as stated in other terms by the myth.
Obviously, a serious scholar should study all the toponymy of Capoterra and nearby places, to verify the oldest names that can be traced back to and if in the past they were called by other names. In any case, a good analysis based on satellite archaeology would be appropriate, to highlight very ancient settlements, Mesolithic or Neolithic, present on the site or UNDER the site (because with great probability they will now be submerged by the layers superimposed over the millennia). Following these interpretations, we can analyze other aspects of mythology: Teti was a Sardinian. Peleus married a Sardinian, but the Greeks called them “sea nymphs”. The garden of the Hesperides is in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, in Sardinia, between the Atlas Mountains, or the Sulcis Mountains, and the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean, or the current Mediterranean. Teti was the eponym of the Sardinian city still called Teti today. Wild boar hunting therefore took place in Sardinia: this custom still exists. Rereading the myth in this way, each piece falls into place and all these stories begin to make perfect sense. In the Paleolithic, the Ocean of Atlantis, or the Atlantic Ocean, was the name that designated part of the current Mediterranean Sea, as in the image below
In light green you can see the whole part of the Sardinian-Corsican block that was submerged no earlier than 9600 BC by a geological catastrophe, described also in Timaeus, which is a text not only of cosmology, but also of astronomical geography, geography and geology. Why is it not possible that it was submerged before? Because the Egyptian priest Sonchis of Sais, who tells these episodes to Solon, states that the war between First Athens and Atlantis broke out nine thousand years before the time of Solon’s trip to Egypt; given that this trip is historically documented and occurred around 580 BC, it means that the war between Athens and Atlantis broke out around 9580 BC: if the war broke out in that period, how long did it last? Where did it take place? In Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean territory or in Greek territory? In what geographical territory did First Greece extend? Where were the two Atlantean and Greek armies when they were submerged? On the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts? After 9580 years + 2024 years (the current date), that is, after about 11,604 years, if the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paleocoasts were submerged and battered by 11,604 years of marine currents and sedimentation of sand on the seabed, how many dozens of meters could these archaeological finds be found under? In my opinion, these are the intelligent questions we should ask ourselves, and all of you, my dear 3 readers, are invited to reflect on these topics that in my opinion could broaden our concept of Ancient History and Ancient Civilizations.
But since in historical times, under the Romans the Atlantic Ocean was called Mare Nostrum, the Paleolithic nomenclature had by then disappeared from most texts. However, many scholars and ancient texts still reported the term Atlantic Ocean. Later, it was called Mediterranean, so the scholars/scientists of the last 2000 years or so focused on looking for the island of Atlantis, namely the Sardinian-Corsican geological block half-submerged in about 9600 BC, in the wrong place: that’s why no one has ever found it.
If it were proven that the author of the article was right and that the Garden of the Hesperides was a real place located in Frutti D’Oro di Capoterra in Sardinia, this could have important implications for the understanding of ancient history and mythology. It could provide new information on the spread of myths and legends and their relationship with historical reality. Furthermore, it could stimulate further research and archaeological excavations in the area to look for further evidence to support this theory.
Yesterday afternoon I, Luigi Usai, woke up after a few hours of sleep. For months now I have not had a time to sleep: I sleep when I am exhausted, at any time of day or night, for the time I need. This has favored my dream activity, which will not be the subject of explanations or disclosure here. Yesterday, suddenly woken up, I don’t know why I searched for documentation online, stumbling upon a text that quoted Herodotus on the people of the Atlanteans:
while I was reading Herodotus’ text translated into Italian I burst into exclamations of joy: Herodotus’ text speaks of Sulcis in Sardinia! What Herodotus says confirms all my statements regarding Sulcis as the Capital of Atlantis! I was very excited and full of joy, but at the same time full of sadness: it is impossible to communicate these discoveries to the scientific world. Unfortunately, the majority of scholars are so full of what Giambattista Vico called the “Arrogance of the Learned”, that it becomes very difficult to share their ideas.
THE TEXTS OF HERODOTUS’ STORIES SCIENTIFICALLY CONFIRM THAT THE PEOPLE OF THE ATLASES WERE SETTLED IN SULCIS, IN NOW SARDINIA.
With this text I invite the World Scientific Community to verify and counter-validate my statements, from now on public. Now that the statements that Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican Geological Block half-submerged in the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean have confirmation in the texts of Herodotus. I publicly and officially ask for verification by scholars from all over the world, in order to be able to take the Knowledge on the Ancient World a few steps further, and allow new discoveries to scholars from all over the world.
Thanks in advance to the Scientific Community.
Slowly, I will paste here a copy of Herodotus’ texts with step by step explanation through satellite images that show the veracity of what the Greek historian stated.
The Atlantic Ocean was the Paleolithic name for the Mediterranean around the Sardinian-Corsican island;
Possible Etymology of Mauretania: Sulcis is inhabited by the Maurreddus. The territories conquered by the Maurreddus were called Maurreddania. In Latin, this geographical name was distorted, so in some very old maps the name Maurrettania is found with two “R”s and two “T”. Later, Latin prevailed, so Maurreddania became Mauretania, without double letters, which are typical of the Sardinian language. Many people, to imitate the Sardinian pronunciation, still today double the consonants of all Italian words to make fun of the Sardinians or to be ironic, both in an offensive sense and in a purely joking and ironic sense. Therefore, if an ancient text states that “Hercules went to Mauritania”, it should be interpreted as “Hercules went to Sulcis”. Probably the current Mauritania is called so because it was a land conquered by the Sulcitani, in the same way as what happened with archaic Libya, explained in the next point. The etymology of the name “Mauretania” therefore, does not derive from the Latin word “Maurītānus”, which means “Mauritanian, [one] of the Moors”, does not derive from “Maurus” which means “Moor”, from the ancient Greek Μαυρός (Maurós) ³, but would derive from the root of the Sardinian term “Maurreddu”, or “Sulcitano”, “inhabitant of Sulcis”. The Sulcis region in Sardinia is inhabited by the Maurreddus, who were later called Mauros or Mauri, and by monophthongization, Mori. The phenomenon by which the diphthong “au” becomes “o” is called monophthongization. Monophthongization is the transformation of a diphthong or triphthong into a long vowel. For example, in the evolution of Latin, the diphthong “au” becomes “o” in words like “laudo”, “plaudo”, “gaudeo”, which give rise to rustic and vulgar forms like “lodo”, “plodo”, “god(e)o” 1 . Some might object that these are mere theoretical speculations, but in reality these statements are supported by the Sardinian and Corsican flags. The hypothesis that the Mauri or Mori were the Sulcitani of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is interesting, but I have not found evidence to support this theory in my research. However, the Sardinian-Corsican flags present some characteristics that could be interpreted as possible evidence to support this hypothesis. The flag of Sardinia, also known as the flag of the four Moors, features four black Moor’s heads, arranged in a St. George’s cross. The flag of Corsica, on the other hand, features a single black Moor. These depictions could be interpreted as a representation of the Mauri or Mori as inhabitants of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. However, it is important to note that the origin and meaning of the depictions of the Moors in the Sardinian-Corsican flags are still a matter of debate among scholars. Some theories suggest that the Moors represent the four Saracen kings defeated by the Aragonese during the Battle of Alcoraz in Spain 1. Other theories suggest that the Moors represent the judges of the Kingdom of Sardinia or the four historical giudicati of the island. But under the powerful light of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean theory, the meaning of the flags of Sardinia and Corsica now take on a totally new and incredible light: it is a logical reversal. Previously it was believed that it was the African Moors who conquered, dominated and acculturated the Sardinian-Corsicans, while now the principle is reversed: it is the Sardinian-Corsicans who dominated, as Sonchis of Sais had stated in Plato’s Timaeus and Critias, all of North Africa up to Egypt, exporting the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean culture and the megalithic culture, perhaps also for the construction of the Egyptian pyramids. If this last piece of information were true, Egypt would not be comfortable or happy to have to affirm the possibility that the pyramids could have been, theoretically, built by Sardinian-Corsican workers, and perhaps even by the Gizanti people, from whom the pyramid of Giza could have hypothetically taken its name. In any case, the presence of the Moors in the Sardinian-Corsican flags is an important symbol and represents the pride and identity of the island’s populations, and the presence of Moors, that is, men with black or dark skin on the flags does nothing but confirm the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm.
Libya, in the 5th century BC, according to the texts of Herodotus and Solon and Plato was an area in the current province of Cagliari ; the undersigned Dr. Luigi Usai understood that when Herodotus is talking about Libya, he is not talking about the Libya that we know in Africa, but rather about Libya as a territory in the province of Cagliari . He realized that Antaeus is the King of Libya ; using logical induction, he thought that if Libya is a portion of the current Campidano in Sardinia, and if Antaeus was the King of Libya, by logical induction then Antaeus was a King of Campidano. Always on an intuitive level, the undersigned Luigi Usai realized that in fact in Sardinia there is a temple of Antas , which could represent Antaeus as an ancient Sardinian deity. In fact, if the Temple of Antas is dedicated to Sardus Pater, why not call it the Temple of Sardus Pater? These reflections and many others, such as the presence of the Amazons on Lake Tritonide in Libya… but this time, reflecting on the fact that Lake Tritonide is in the South of Sardinia, all of Herodotus’ Geography falls into place correctly. The Libyan Desert, on the other hand, would be, according to the writer Luigi Usai, the Sardinian Desert of Porto Pino, which is practically unknown to the entire world except to the Sardinians themselves. “Atlantis and the secrets of the Sardinian deserts” When we talk about Atlantis, popular imagination often transports us to distant and mysterious submerged lands. However, the search for this legendary civilization could take us much closer to home than we think, precisely in the sands of the Desert des Agriates in Corsica and in the Libyan Sardinian desert of Porto Pino. The Desert des Agriates , despite its name, is not a true desert in the traditional sense. It is, instead, a wild and rocky area of 15,000 hectares between Saint-Florent and l’Ile-Rousse. But what connects it to the legend of Atlantis? And how does it relate to the Porto Pino desert in Sardinia? Both the Desert des Agriates and the Sardinian Libyan Desert of Porto Pino share a number of unique geological and historical features . Both represent almost inhospitable regions, dominated by sand dunes and characterized by a landscape that seems suspended in time. Archaeological finds in the vicinity of these areas have shown traces of ancient civilizations, which could suggest that they were once flourishing areas, before some great cataclysm or climate change. On this site I declare that, in my opinion, when it is said that in Atlantis there was also a desert, it is the Porto Pino desert and the Corsican Des Agriates that are being talked about..In conclusion, as the search for the legendary Atlantis continues, it is possible that some of the most significant clues are hidden in the sand dunes of our desert neighbors. And as the mystery of Atlantis slowly unfolds, areas such as the Desert des Agriates and Porto Pino serve as powerful reminders of the ancient civilizations that once dominated these lands and the secrets they may still hold beneath their sands.
in the territories of present-day Sardinia lived at least the following peoples : Ausei, Maclei, Libi, Atlanti, Ammonii, Nasomonii, Lotophagi, Ethiopian troglodytes; the Giligami are a people of Libya who border the Adirmachidi and the Asbisti. They inhabit a territory that goes from the island of Aphrodisias to the mouth of the Sirte, where silphium is grown. The Ammonii instead with a very high probability are those who created ammonia: the Ammonii made ammonia; this is not a joke, I will refine this information as I study the subject, but it is already an excellent starting point for researchers who want to delve deeper into the subject on their own.
In the present Sulcis there was a desert that flanked at least two mountains of salt: one in Carloforte , still present, and one next to Mount Atlas, which now seems to have disappeared (data to be verified) while the other location could be “Perd’e Sali” which in Sardinian means “Salt Stone” : therefore there would only have remained a toponymic reference to that ancient mountain of salt previously present and now therefore disappeared, perhaps melted by the rain;
the lakes of today’s Cagliari and its province were seen as a single enormous lake, which was called Lake Tritonide;
the Amazons of Myrina lived in Lake Tritonis;
Lake Tritonide took its name from an ancient ruler who was later mythologized according to a euhemeristic procedure, as also happened with Poseidon; Lake Tritonide took its name from the ancient ruler Triton, of whom various documents can be found in ancient texts;
archaeologists are aware that ancient Sardinia was matriarchal, but until now I had never heard any archaeologist say that the Amazons were Sardinian, nor that Lake Tritonide is in Cagliari and its province, up to Capoterra; therefore I think that these are my very original ideas and obviously I am convinced that they are also right ideas, because the whole mosaic puts together all the puzzles that were not clear to me. There were too many incomprehensible absurdities in ancient times, but now, by renaming the satellite maps of Cagliari, Sulcis and Southern Sardinia, everything starts to make perfect logical sense again.
Herodotus reports that the Atlanteans do not dream at night: in fact, the rite of incubation took place in Sardinia. Since I have never studied it seriously in my life, I cannot explain what it is about, but archaeologists will perfectly understand the implications of this point I am mentioning. This is another proof in favor of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm. Probably the Sulcitani/Atlantis were annoyed by the fact that they did not dream, and so the rite of incubation was born for reasons related to the satisfaction of a need of this people that we may never even understand, unless we find new archaeological sources that explain or clarify these facts.
Herodotus mentions in the Histories, chapter IV, mountains of salt ; I think one was located in Carloforte where salt mines still exist today : just imagine how it must have been 2500 years ago! I think a second mountain of salt was where Sardinian toponymy still presents this name: “Perd’e Sali”, which means “Stone of Salt” in Campidanese Sardinian and Sulcitano Sardinian.
Sardinia or Atlantis Sardo Corsa was also called Nesos Espera . The Hesperides Islands are therefore Sardinia and Corsica and the small islands such as S. Antioco and Carloforte; Esperidi is an adjective that designates the women who live in Espera, that is in Sardinia; Espera is also the name of the westernmost island that remained on Lake Tritonide in the current Stagni di Cagliari. We must therefore be careful not to confuse the term Espera when it refers to Sardinia and when it refers to the island of Lake Tritonide.
In this study, we propose a new perspective for archaeologists regarding the mythological figure of the Minotaur. In particular, we suggest exploring the possibility that the Minotaur is a Sardinian-Corsican mythological figure, and making comparisons between the Minotaur and the Sardinian legendary creatures Su Boe Erchitu and Su Boe Muliache. These creatures are described as follows: “Su Boe Erchitu is a legendary creature of Sardinian folk tradition. This should not be confused with Su Boe Muliache, another Sardinian legendary creature” (Wikipedia). Furthermore, we propose to examine the possibility that the Minotaur is an ancient Sardinian belief/legend revived in Crete by the Minoans, who were ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations to Crete. As is known, Arthur Evans arbitrarily chose the word “Minoans” to describe this civilization. Furthermore, there is also the Androcephalic Bull or bronze of Nule, which could confirm these hypotheses. We invite scholars to explore these new lines of thought and to open themselves to examining possibilities that until now had been excluded a priori. In particular, we suggest re-examining the toponymy of Sulcis, since the names of the towns that refer to the Platonic myth must have a reason. For example, in Carbonia there is a hamlet called “Acqua Callentis”; next to it there is Caput Acquas; in Nuxis “S’acqua callenti de Basciu”, S’Acqua callenti de Susu; the medieval town of Acquafredda disappeared, which left the castle of Acquafredda; the source of Zinnigas; and there are even connections to Egyptian toponymy: Heliopolis (city of the sun) and in Sulcis Terr’e Soli (land of the sun, Terresoli). Sais in Egypt and Is Sais Inferiore and Is Sais Superiore in Sulcis. Furthermore, we propose to take this toponymy seriously and to follow these new unexplored paths. For example, the Mesolithic or Neolithic people could have used the terms “goats” or “sheep” or “donkeys” or “pigs” in a deictic manner. In fact: Cabras (“goats” in Sardinian) is a surname; it is a place; it is the meeting place of the Giants of Mont’e Prama; and it means goats and it has a pond. And right in Sulcis there is the Is Brebeis pond (it means “sheep” in Sardinian) while there is the Molentargius pond (molenti means “donkey” in Sardinian) and there is the Sale Porcus pond (porcus means “pigs” in Sardinian). Furthermore, the Cabras pond is the largest in the world, which can lead to the assumption that it was caused by tectonics or tellurics; its duck shape then, could have some hidden meaning that we do not yet fully understand (Titicaca has the shape of a puma hunting a viscacha). Finally, we suggest as a first step for archaeologists or superintendents to immediately obtain very high definition bathymetries of the seabeds of all the water basins of Sulcis and Cabras. In particular, we propose bathymetries of the Is Brebeis pond, of the Porto Pino pond,of the Porto Botte pond and Monte Prano. This would be an excellent start to explore these new lines of thought. Furthermore, we suggest extensive checks in all the caves of Sulcis up to the layers of 9600 BC and beyond. In summary, this study proposes a new perspective for archaeologists regarding the mythological figure of the Minotaur and suggests exploring new lines of thought regarding the toponymy of Sulcis. We invite scholars to examine these possibilities and to follow these new unexplored paths. We hope that these proposals can stimulate further research and discussion in this field.
Evemerism : Poseidon was an ancient ruler of the Sardinian-Corsa island, later deified. According to my theory, there is the possibility that in the Sulcis mountains there are still prehistoric remains of the capital of Atlantis, probably covered by debris exactly as happened in Göbekli Tepe. It is therefore a question of applying the same scientific methods to bring to light the historical and scientific finds of the Atlantean past.
The Basque people are an ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migration , clearly visible to those who have enough culture to see it: to this end we cite the figure of the Zanpantzar or Joaldun which is a “genetic” variant of the figures of the Sardinian Mammuttones, the Sardinian Boes and Merdules, Sos Thurpos and S’Eritaju . The Basque language is also a prehistoric linguistic variant of the Sardinian-Corsican languages and dialects. To better understand this post, see the video on YouTube:
related to the Ituren – Zubieta Carnival 2019 Navarra – Pais Vasco and see in particular the figure of the Joaldunak of Ituren ( Ioaldunak à Ituren (Navarra )). Zanpantzar or Joaldun is a traditional character of the Basque culture of the Navarrese towns of Ituren and Zubieta who announces the arrival of Carnival by shaking their cowbells ( joareak or joaleak ) in the last week of January. Currently there are Zanpantzar comparsas both in Navarra and in the Basque Country (text about Zanpantzar translated from Basque Wikipedia). The figure of the Zanpantzar or Joaldun are nothing more than “cultural mutations” of the Sardinian masks of the Boes and Merdules, the Mammuttones, Sos Thurpos and S’Eritaju and other masks of the Sardinian carnival, which in the Basque Country have mutated, as happens in genetic mutations over millennia and millennia. Also noteworthy is the etymological convergence between the toponyms of Ittiri (a Sardinian town) and Ituren (a Navarrese Basque town). There are several similarities between the Sardinian and Basque languages . According to an article in La Nuova Sardegna, there are hundreds of similar words between the two languages, as well as many linguistic affinities . For example, the holly plant is called “galostiu” in Sardinian and “gorostoi” in Basque. There are also similarities in place names , such as the towns of Aritzo in Sardinia and Aritzu in the Basque Country. I want to add that I have personally noticed two rivers called Arrexi and Arantza, which in my Sardinian Campidanese dialect Assemininese mean respectively “Root” (“Arrexi”, which we can also say “Arrexini”) and “Arantza” or “Arantzu” (that is, orange), which we can also say “Arangiu”. Among Sardinians, the variability of linguistic terms is very famous: in Sardinia there are an infinite number of linguistic mutations that Sardinians currently accept, for example the olive, which provides the oil drupe, the fruit of the olive tree, can be called “olia”, “obia”, with the meaning of “olive”. Now we have incredible linguistic congruences that only a Sardinian understands intuitively, due to prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican migrations, because those who speak these languages understand them instinctively. If we then add exclusively Sardinian figures such as the Mammuttones and the Boes and the Merdules, Sos Thurpos and S’Eritaju and we realize the existence in the Basque country of the figures of the Zanpantzar or Joaldun, then the fact that the Basques are an ancient Sardinian-Corsican migration becomes increasingly clear and evident.In addition to vocabulary, there are also phonetic similarities between the two languages. For example, neither language has the “V” sound, which is present in most Indo-European languages. Both languages also have the “TZ” sound, which is not present in surrounding languages. These similarities suggest that there may have been historical connections between the two regions. Some researchers have proposed that there may have been a prehistoric migration from the Iberian Peninsula to Sardinia, which could explain the linguistic similarities. It is therefore necessary to establish scientific and academic, as well as archaeological and historical, relations between the Basque and Sardinian-Corsian Universities, in order to discover all the other relations that show common prehistoric origins. Until now, it has been believed, erroneously, that the Basque people came out of nowhere, because their customs and language were too different from those of France and Spain… in reality they were different simply because the Basque people were Sardinians who migrated from an area of Sardinia, although it is not yet clear which one it was, to colonize those places. For those with a careful geographical eye, then, it could also happen to notice that the profile of the Sulcis coast and the profile of the Pyrenees coast are almost identical ! (Attention, this is my personal intuition not yet proven). So the prehistoric sailors who had arrived on the Pyrenees coast, could have felt that geographical place almost identical to their beloved Sulcis, and perhaps this is one of the reasons that induced them to land and try to colonize those places: the sense of familiarity with the Sardinian coast of Sulcis. Authors of the caliber of Juan Martin Elexpuru have realized the incredible linguistic affinities between Basque and Sardinian, but as has been happening for millennia for Sardinia, the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm has been totally overturned: Juan Martin Elexpuru thought that it was the Basques who had “colonized” Sardinia. Instead, the exact opposite happened: it was the Sardinian-Corsicans who colonized the Basque Country, also bringing traditions such as those of the Zanpantzar or Joaldun and their customs and language. Sardinia and the Basque Country are two European regions that have some cultural and linguistic similarities. In particular, both regions have indigenous languages that are not traceable to any of the Indo-European languages. Furthermore, both regions have an ancient and complex history that has led to the formation of unique and distinctive cultures. However, despite these similarities, the relationship between the two regions has not yet been fully explored. One of the ways to explore this relationship is through the study of population genetics. In particular, the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be carried out through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations. Furthermore, it could help to better understand the history of Sardinia and the Basque Country and strengthen the ties between the two regions. A study published in PubMed compared the mitochondrial DNA of 50 Basque individuals and 50 Sardinian individuals. The study found that the two populations have similar genetic diversity and that both populations have a strong affinity with European populations. Another study published in Nature compared the DNA of 70 ancient individuals collected from 21 archaeological sites in Sardinia with the DNA of other ancient and modern individuals. The study found that the Sardinian population has a complex genetic history and that it has similarities with European and Mediterranean populations. In conclusion, the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be carried out through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations.” Basque also has deep relations and contacts with the Atlanteans who migrated to Sumer, who used the Atlantean language called Sumerian today. Basque is an ergative-absolutive language, a feature it shares with Sumerian, the language of the Sumerians . This point has been emphasized both by Ifejika in his book “The Wise Men From the East” and by Luigi Usai in his study on the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm. Both languages, Basque and Sumerian, are agglutinative . This means that they use affixes to express grammatical relations between words. This similarity has been noted by both Ifejika and Usai, although they followed completely different paths of reasoning. Ifejika conducted extensive research to solve the mystery of the “black-headed people” (the Sumerians) who established civilization in the Middle East about 5,000 years ago; on the other hand, Usai reached similar conclusions through the analysis of the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm, an approach that indirectly confirms Ifejika’s work. Interestingly, Usai was completely unaware of Ifejika before making his independent discovery. Usai points out that the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm scientifically proves a direct connection between the two languages and between various others, such as Hebrew; this is an important point to remember when discussing the closeness between Basque and Sumerian. References: Ifejika, M. (2015). The Wise Men From the East: Tracing the Origin of Sumerians and their civilization. ISBN-13: 978-1502555748. Usai, L. (2024). The Sardinian Paradigm Corso Atlantean. ISBN-13: 979-8879035650.
If the Goddess Athena was born on Lake Tritonis , and if my statements are correct, it means that the ancients were trying to tell us that the Goddess Athena was born in the Lakes in the province of Cagliari. This is incredible: because the priest of Sais tells Sonchis that Athena founded the first city of Athens and the city of Sais in Egypt a thousand years later ; Athena founded the city of Sais in Egypt 8000 years before Solon’s visit to Egypt, around 590 BC; this implies that Athena, the Sardinian goddess, founded the city of Sais around 8590 BC; the Sardinian goddess Athena founded the first Athens a thousand years before Sais, so around 9590 BC. One thing still remains to be clarified: the title of Athena Sardinia, goddess of War, was passed as an honorific title from woman to woman in the Sardinian matriarchal system, for thousands of years, as the title of Pharaoh was passed from father to son in ancient Egypt? Was the goddess Athena Sardinian? Minerva is the Roman equivalent of the Greek goddess Athena. They are essentially the same goddess, but with different names due to the different cultures that worshipped them. Minerva was the goddess of wisdom, war, art, schools and commerce in Roman mythology, while Athena had similar roles in Greek mythology. According to some recent studies, it is believed that Aeneas (Enea) landed in Castro, Italy, where there was a “rock with the temple of Minerva”. So, if all this reasoning is correct, then Athena is of Sardinian origin and the Latin Minerva is a Sardinian goddess. It is therefore possible on a speculative and purely theoretical level that the mother goddess worshipped by the ancient Mediterranean peoples was none other than a Sardinian deity called by many names: Athena in Greece, Minerva among the Romans, Neith or Nith or Nit among the Egyptians, and Neith or Nith or Nit among the Irish. Neith (also known as Nit, Net and Neit) is an Egyptian deity belonging to the religion of ancient Egypt. She was the patroness of the city of Sais in Egypt, the city in which the Egyptian priest known as Sonchis of Sais revealed the story of Atlantis to Solon. In Irish mythology Neit (Néit, Nét, Neith) is a god of war. In my opinion the civilization that may have transported the cult of Neith – Athena – Minerva throughout the Mediterranean Sea may have been the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean culture, and this explains why the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans brought the cult of the war goddess Neith to Ireland as well. In Ireland, Neith was a god of war in Irish mythology. He was one of the Tuatha Dé Dannan, the last group of supernatural men to invade the Emerald Isle. The Tuatha Dé Dannan, largely considered the ancestral gods of the Irish people, are deities of Celtic culture 1. There is no evidence to suggest that the Egyptians ever visited Ireland or that there are Egyptian artefacts in Ireland. However, the National Museum of Ireland has a collection of Egyptian artefacts received during the late 19th century from the excavation divisions of the Egypt Exploration Fund in London, including sites such as Hieraconpolis, Deir el-Bahri, Ehnasya, Oxyrhynchus, Tarkhan and Riqqa 2 . At this point it is necessary to introduce some more information, to clarify for scholars who wish to understand better. Sardinia is full of symbols of the Goddess Tanit. In hieroglyphics, the word Tanit is written and read Ta Neith, which means “Land of Neith”. If all I say is correct, Sardinia is indeed the land of the Goddess Neith, that is, Sardinia is the land of the Goddess Athena, of the Goddess Neith, of the Goddess Minerva. Athena is therefore Sardinian. Since these are very strong claims, it will take some time for scholars to find further evidence to confirm my claims, which are too novel to be believed right away. In fact, Sonchis of Sais speaks of the goddess Neith and Athena in the Platonic texts of Timaeus and Critias. In particular, when Sonchis begins to explain in the text of Timaeus, he states that the Greeks worship a goddess who in Greek is called Athena and in Egyptian is called Neith; Sonchis goes on to state that the goddess Neith-Athena founded the city of Sais 8000 years before, that is in 8590 BC, and immediately after that he states that the Goddess Athena founded the first Athens a thousand years before the city of Sais, in 9590 BC. These dates can be derived scientifically because Solon’s journey to Egypt dates back to 590 BC, thus allowing us to obtain a series of certain dates to which the story refers. Athena is called Parthenos, which in Greek means “virgin,” because, like her fellow goddesses Artemis and Hestia, she was believed to remain perpetually virgin . 1 The name Parthenon comes from one of Athena’s many epithets: Athena Parthenos, meaning Virgin. Parthenon means “house of Parthenos,” which was the name given in the 5th century BC to the chamber (cella) within the temple that housed the cult statue, and by the 4th century BC the entire building acquired the name Parthenon . 2 I have found no source to suggest a direct connection between the statue of Athena Parthenos and the Amazons’ custom of not marrying unless one had killed at least one man. However, the statue of Athena Parthenos, sculpted by Phidias, depicted an Amazon fallen on Athena’s shield . 1 The Amazons were a nation of female warriors in Greek mythology, and the subject of the Amazonomachy (battles between ancient Greeks and the Amazons) was popular in ancient Greek and Roman art . 1Furthermore, according to some sources, the Amazons were not favorably disposed towards the institution of marriage, but engaged in sexual activity to justify the continuation of their race, with men from neighboring clans, prisoners of war, or random men they encountered . 2 Herodotus also stated that the Amazons had a marriage custom that forbade a young woman from marrying until she had killed a man in battle . 3 Athena is a goddess in Greek mythology, associated with wisdom, war, crafts, and the arts. According to Greek mythology, Athena was born from the head of Zeus, fully armed and ready for battle. There is no evidence to suggest that Athena originated in Sardinia or that she was worshipped as a Sardinian goddess. Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that the title of Athena was passed from woman to woman in the Sardinian matriarchal system. Minerva is the Roman equivalent of the Greek goddess Athena and had similar roles in Roman mythology. Neith is an Egyptian goddess of the ancient Egyptian religion and was the patroness of the city of Sais in Egypt. In Irish mythology, Neith was a god of war. There is no evidence to suggest that Neith was worshipped as a Sardinian or Irish goddess. Tanit was a Carthaginian goddess associated with fertility, love and pleasure. Many symbols associated with Tanit have been found in Sardinia, but there is no evidence to suggest that Tanit was originally from Sardinia or that she was worshipped as a Sardinian goddess. In fact, the information I have provided about the founding of the cities of Athens and Sais by Athena is not supported by reliable historical or archaeological sources, and that is why if it were to be correct, it would demonstrate absolute genius, as to my current knowledge (19/08/2023) there is currently no other text that states these things; therefore they seem to be profoundly innovative and original ideas in the scientific panorama. Cicero also expressed his opinion on the identification of the goddess Neith with Athena in his work entitled De natura deorum, book 3, 23, 59. In book 3, 23, 59 of Cicero’s De Natura Deorum, an identification is made between the Egyptian goddess Neith and the Greek goddess Athena. Cicero writes: “And just as we venerate Minerva, so the Egyptians venerate Neith” (Ita ut Minervam nos, ita Neith Aegyptii colunt).
Among the purely speculative statements, I point out that I am evaluating the hypothesis according to which the Trogloditica mentioned in some ancient texts could be the area of Olbia in present-day Sardinia . I have to double-check all the sources after having searched for them and collected them in a single textual point. The city of Olbia was located in the Trogloditica: until now it was thought that it was a place on the Red Sea; the Troglodytes were a people who “lived in holes”. Now present-day Sardinia is full of evidence of “men who lived in natural holes”, that is, in caves: we have remains in the rock shelter of Sirri in Carbonia, analyzed among others by Professor Carlo Lugliè; we have the remains found in the cave of Lanaittu; I have to collect all the other scientific evidence to be able to try to demonstrate these statements. Furthermore, I have to verify the hypothesis that there is a correlation in the names of Olbia and Sparta, but for the moment I am not able to provide more details.
I found an error in the date of the sinking of Atlantis in my initial hypothesis . 9600 BC is the date of the foundation of the first Athens, the one mentioned in Timaeus and Critias, the famous works of Plato. So the Sardinian-Corsica island of Atlantis cannot have sunk in 9600 BC, because Athens had just been founded, while Sais was founded by Athena, according to what Sonchis of Sais said, around 8600 BC. Athens had particular laws, which were later borrowed from the Egyptian legislation of Sais, for example the division into social classes, shepherds, soldiers, priests… Athens became wonderful and capable of extraordinary things, but at a certain point an external power, in the Atlantic Ocean, that is, in the Sea of Sardinia, tried to invade the sea this side of the Pillars of Carloforte now known as the Pillars of Hercules. The date of the invasion, however, is not written: this is the trauma, the serious problem. At this moment we have no clear idea of what date Sonchis is talking about to Solon. During the clash between Athens and Atlantis, a submersion phenomenon occurs, during which Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis is partially submerged and the entire Greek army sinks under the sea. Therefore, given that Athens was founded around 9600 BC, given that it has become very powerful and extraordinary and capable of incredible feats, it is possible that even thousands of years have passed: it is this very long time that may have made it exceptional: enormous capabilities, very long times prolonged for millennia that may have perfected and refined culture and technique. However, we have the testimony of the Temple of Medinet Abu where it is said that the “Nun came out of his bed”, “The Ocean came out of his bed”: it could really be this, perhaps the episode described by Sonchis to Solon. In this case, the date of submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts would be around 1200 BC and not in 9600.
03/08/2023: I am starting to seriously evaluate the hypothesis that the theft of the Golden Fleece was linked to the theft of sea byssus from Sant’Antioco and the province; now that the Garden of the Hesperides is located in Frutti d’Oro di Capoterra; now that Lake Tritonide is the sum of the lakes that lie between Cagliari and Capoterra; now that the Atlas Mountains are the Sulcis Mountains, everything seems to suggest that the Greeks had heard of the importance of sea byssus for the Sardinians: in fact, it is so precious that it cannot be bought with money, it can only be donated. If this was the case even thousands of years ago, then it is possible that the Greeks understood its incredible preciousness and decided to steal the precious Sardinian fabric. This theft would then have been mythologized as the Theft of the Golden Fleece. At the moment I am still in the analysis phase of this hypothesis; it seems very plausible to me, but evidence is needed for a possible demonstration. It may be impossible to prove that the Golden Fleece was a Sardinian sea-silk fabric from Sant’Antioco or its province, but trying is a worthy undertaking. It would also bring the mythical tale back to reality. New discovery: today I found the following source online: “THE GOLDEN FLEECE? It was the BISSO!” Shardana i Popoli del Mare (Leonardo Melis). Consulted on August 3, 2023. http://shardanaleo.blogspot.com/2013/09/il-vello-doro-era-il-bisso.html . which confirms to me that, if I understand correctly, about a decade ago the Gentile Leonardo Melis had the same intuition as me, at least 10 years before me. Incredible. The date of the article is Sunday, September 29, 2013, so I had this intuition almost 10 years later. The only difference is that I am providing a disproportionate amount of information to support this, and all of it converges towards the confirmation of this hypothesis, which, if stated alone, could have seemed impossible. If the hypothesis is correct, if I am not mistaken, it should follow that Colchis was the area of Carloforte, Sant’Antioco, and who knows, perhaps up to Gonnesa, Bacu Abis etc. Now, the next job will be to take up all the texts that mention Colchis and study them one by one until we find information that confirms or denies what is stated here and what the most gentle Leonardo Melis said before me. Among the ancient texts that speak of Colchis, we can cite the works of Apollonius of Rhodes, who in his epic poem “The Argonautica” narrates the story of the expedition of the Argonauts in search of the Golden Fleece. Hesiod, in his “Theogony”, also mentions Colchis as the place where the garden of the Hesperides was located, guarded by the dragon Ladon. Furthermore, authors such as Herodotus, Strabo and Diodorus Siculus provide information about the geography and history of Colchis in their historical and geographical works. So there is a sort of logical coherence:if in Hesiod and Apollonius Rhodius Colchis is the name of the current South Sardinia, the whole discussion becomes coherent and sensible again . However, if all this is true, then it will be necessary to recreate the ancient maps again and reposition the geographical names correctly , to allow new scholars and researchers not to incur the same errors that we have incurred up to now.
Coastal Navigation: Let’s start with the data. The Uluburun wreck is a Late Bronze Age shipwreck dating back to the end of the 14th century BC 1 . It was discovered near the eastern coast of Uluburun (Great Cape), Turkey, in the Mediterranean Sea. The wreck was discovered in the summer of 1982 by Mehmed Çakir, a local diver from Yalıkavak, a village near Bodrum 1. The navigation of the Uluburun wreck, according to my current state of knowledge, is coastal. This means that in the 14th century BC, navigation was most likely carried out while keeping the coast in sight, in order to be able to save oneself by swimming in the event of the vessel sinking. Probably, while navigating by sight in North Africa, a storm may have pushed a ship of Greek sailors off course, who ended up beyond the Atlantic Ocean, as they then called the Sea of Sardinia and Corsica, always according to my theory. Having ended up in what we now call the Gulf of Cagliari, they saw an immense large lake that they called Tritonide, probably after the first contacts with the natives (natives means inhabitants of the place, i.e. the ancient Sardinians). There is also a toponymic correspondence with the Garden of the Hesperides and Golden Fruits of Capoterra, as already explained elsewhere in this text. There is therefore a strong probability that the Faraglioni of Carloforte marked the limit beyond which not to go because beyond that one would go into the open sea without the possibility of coastal navigation by sight. That’s why in my opinion that was the limit of the world known to the ancient Greeks, at least in the 14th century BC. So in my opinion the known limit was not the Strait of Gibraltar, but the Pillars of Hercules of Carloforte in Sardinia as defined by Professor Giorgio Saba. By moving the Pillars of Hercules it is possible to understand what Sonchis of Sais was saying in his speeches to Solon; it is possible to macro-localize the toponymic position of the Garden of the Hesperides; it is possible to find Atlantis and the Atlas Mountains. It is possible to locate what Lake Tritonis was and its position: with my general theory it is possible to understand why various authors speak of North Africa: Cagliari is REALLY positioned north of Africa, only that it is separated by a short stretch of sea. But until now, scholars have interpreted the phrase North Africa literally, mistakenly believing that it was referring to the northernmost part of African territory, that is, present-day Tunisia or Libya. All the Mycenaean finds in our possession show archaeologically and scientifically the contacts between the Mycenaean Greek populations and the south of Sardinia, empirically confirming, at least on a theoretical level, what I stated. Until now, the scientific paradigm has been to hypothesize the Pillars of Hercules in Gibraltar and the Atlantic Ocean beyond, but this paradigm seems to be imprecise: the Pillars ended up in Gibraltar only many centuries or millennia later. Before that, the real and most ancient Pillars of Hercules were located in what we now call Faraglione Antiche Colonne di Carloforte, between the islands of Carloforte and Sant’Antioco. The discovery of Professor Giorgio Saba is extraordinary, breathtaking. This new, precious information puts Sardinia, and consequently the Sardinian-Corsican geological block,at the extreme western edge of the ancient Greek and Mycenaean world. This paradigm shift leads to imagine the first linguistic and cultural exchanges between these peoples, so linguistics is fully invested by the consequences of the statements made here: the Mycenaean and ancient Sardinian languages mixed, with contaminations derived from the prehistoric contacts between these populations. Therefore it is necessary to restore the dignity of study to the Sardinian languages and dialects, to Sardinian culture in general, which seems to have been ignored or downgraded for a long time, deprived of its real importance for the ancient world. In Italy we study ancient and modern Greek, ancient Latin, classical and medieval, but no one seems interested in the study of languages, Sardinian dialects neither ancient nor modern, it is as if they were ashamed: why? Why have we made these languages, dialects and cultures, ancient and modern, lose their dignity of teaching? The Sardinians themselves are ashamed of their language, and when they use it it almost seems as if they are “contaminating” the Italian language. All this absolutely must change. We must put Sardinia and the Sardinian-Corsican block back in its place in antiquity and history, in geography and linguistics, in the history of trade and cultures and tourism. This is what real scientists would do. The problem, however, becomes more complicated: here, for now, we have been talking about Sardinian languages and dialects, and we must clarify; from the fourth book of Herodotus’ Histories, if we interpret the current province of Cagliari as Libya, we deduce that the south of current Sardinia was a melting pot of peoples and cultures, not a single identity: we are talking about dozens of peoples, all described with different uses, customs and traditions: Amazons, Gizanti, Maclei, Atlanti, Ataranti, peoples who built houses with blocks of salt (perhaps in what is now Perd’e Sali?).and when they use it it almost seems like they are “contaminating” the Italian language. All this absolutely must change. We must put Sardinia and the Sardinian-Corsican block back in its place in antiquity and history, in geography and linguistics, in the history of trade and cultures and tourism. This is what real scientists would do. The problem, however, becomes more complicated: here for now we have been talking about Sardinian languages and dialects, and we must clarify; from the fourth book of Herodotus’ Histories, if we interpret the current province of Cagliari as Libya, we deduce that the south of current Sardinia was a melting pot of peoples and cultures, not a single identity: we are talking about dozens of peoples, all described with different uses, customs and traditions: Amazons, Gizanti, Maclei, Atlanti, Ataranti, peoples who built houses with blocks of salt (perhaps in what is now Perd’e Sali?).and when they use it it almost seems like they are “contaminating” the Italian language. All this absolutely must change. We must put Sardinia and the Sardinian-Corsican block back in its place in antiquity and history, in geography and linguistics, in the history of trade and cultures and tourism. This is what real scientists would do. The problem, however, becomes more complicated: here for now we have been talking about Sardinian languages and dialects, and we must clarify; from the fourth book of Herodotus’ Histories, if we interpret the current province of Cagliari as Libya, we deduce that the south of current Sardinia was a melting pot of peoples and cultures, not a single identity: we are talking about dozens of peoples, all described with different uses, customs and traditions: Amazons, Gizanti, Maclei, Atlanti, Ataranti, peoples who built houses with blocks of salt (perhaps in what is now Perd’e Sali?).
I would like to underline at this point an intuition that I had and that could have interesting implications. At the moment it is only a hypothesis without certain foundation, purely speculative. I was struck by the homonymy between the Pyramid of Giza and the people of the Gizanti. After I have already shown in these texts the strange proximity between ancient Egypt and the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean peoples, I would not be surprised to discover or who knows, perhaps demonstrate, later, a possible relationship between the people of the Gizanti of Colchis in Sardinia and the construction of the pyramid of Giza. It is an abstract hypothesis, completely unfounded, but it can be an intriguing new path of study and creative research, even if it turns out to be totally wrong and unfounded.
Geocriticism is a method of literary analysis and literary theory that incorporates the study of geographical space. Using this method, we can examine how the theories of the writer Luigi Usai on the discovery of Atlantis, the Garden of the Hesperides, Lake Tritonis, the Amazons of Myrina relate to geographical space, in particular to ancient geographical space and the new reinsertion of Sardinia and its islands within ancient mapping systems. If what is stated on this site and in the books published by Luigi Usai is true, then it will be necessary to re-create ancient cartography, to facilitate the work of learning about antiquity for new generations of scholars, historians, geographers, philologists, philosophers, geologists and so on. According to Luigi Usai, the Pillars of Hercules are located in Carloforte as stated in Giorgio Saba’s book, near the island of San Pietro, in Sardinia. Giorgio Saba’s discovery offers us a new perspective on the geography of Sardinia and its relationship with ancient mythology. Furthermore, Luigi Usai has proposed that Sulcis is the capital of Atlantis and that Atlantis is the partially submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. These theories offer us a new understanding of the geography of Sardinia and Corsica and their relationship to ancient history. Geocriticism allows us to examine how these theories relate to geographical space and how this affects our understanding of ancient history. For example, we can examine how the location of the Pillars of Hercules in Carloforte affects our understanding of ancient mythology and the geography of Sardinia. Furthermore, we can examine how Luigi Usai’s theory of Atlantis and Sulcis affects our understanding of the geography of Sardinia and Corsica and their relationship to ancient history.
Tamil Nadu Jallikattu: I am beginning to think that this rite could be of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin, like the bullfight and bull games of the Cretans. This hypothesis needs to be studied in depth for possible consequences, for example of a linguistic nature.
Various cultures around the world have developed practices and rituals involving bulls or other large animals. Here are some of these practices that may have superficial similarities with the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean bullfighting and that in my opinion may have very remote common origins in the Sardinian-Corsican culture:
Course camarguaise (France): This is a form of bullfighting traditional in the Camargue region of southern France. Unlike Spanish bullfighting, the goal is not to kill the bull. Instead, the razeteurs try to remove a ribbon or rosette from the bull’s horns using only one hand.
Bous al mar (Spain): In Denia, in the Valencia region of Spain, there is an event called “Bous al mar” (Bulls to the Sea). The bulls are run through the streets to a pier, where spectators try to knock them into the sea, while trying to avoid being pushed into the water by the bull.
Rodeo (United States and Canada): Although the roots of rodeo are different from bullfighting, it shares the element of men trying to dominate or show off their skills against a powerful animal. Events include bull riding, bronco riding (wild horses), and lassoing.
Zampanzar (Spain): During the festivities of San Sebastian in some parts of Spain, a bull with a series of rockets tied to its horns is released into the streets. Spectators try to run and get close to the bull without being hit by the rockets.
Coleo (Venezuela and Colombia): Although it involves horses rather than bulls, Coleo is a sport in which riders try to bring down a bull or cow by pulling it by its tail.
Buffalo Racing (India and Thailand): In coastal regions of India, such as Karnataka, and in Thailand, buffalo racing is traditional. Although it does not involve direct human-animal combat, it does feature a display of strength and speed between the animals, often with humans attempting to control them during the race.
Cretan Bullfighting: The earliest depictions of bullfighting are found in the Minoan art of ancient Crete (ca. 2000-1400 BC). They show young athletes leaping over the backs of bulls or performing acrobatics. It is unclear whether these were religious rites, athletic activities, or both. There is no indication that bulls were killed in these events.
Bullfighting: Spanish bullfighting is a form of bullfighting in which a torero, or matador, fights a bull in a series of stages culminating in the killing of the bull. It has ancient origins and can be traced back to ancient Rome, but the modern form has medieval origins. It has a deep cultural and ritual connection in Spain and other parts of the Spanish-speaking world, but is also controversial due to animal rights issues.
Jallikattu: Jallikattu has its roots in the Pongal harvest celebration in Tamil Nadu. It is not a bull-killing sport; instead, the aim is to tame or cling to the bull. However, it has sparked controversy and debate over animal rights in India, leading to regulations and temporary bans.
A hypothesis that I am not yet able to elaborate further is the following: the languages that have been called Indo-European until now could actually be Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean languages. It is possible that the Sardinian-Corsicans, in the remote past, could have also reached India, creating some ethnic strains that have remained there; given the practice of Jallikattu and for other reasons that I cannot list for now, I hypothesize that some Indian ethnic groups, for example the Tamils, are of Sardinian-Corsican origin. They would therefore have linguistic and ethnocultural points in common. However, this is an exclusively theoretical-speculative hypothesis that does not yet have solid foundations. But I would like to point it out, in case others notice and think they are the first to have thought of it.
The submerged city of Athens from 9600 BC was found by Luigi Usai on the Sicily-Malta platform.
Atlantis had a circular shape with concentric canals that connected the sea to the central city; this shape is found in the three-dimensional seabed of the Sardinian-Corsican block.
Atlantis was rich in precious metals such as gold, silver and orichalcum; these metals are also present in the Sardinian-Corsican territory.
Archaeological evidence has never been found because it has never been sought: this is because the Sardinian academic and archaeological world, in general, has always considered the discourses on Atlantis as fables of Plato with literary, political or philosophical intentions. Therefore, no one has carried out stratigraphic archaeological excavations in Sardinia that reach 9600 BC.
No one to date has yet discovered the dimensions of Libya and Asia in 9600 BC; no one, to date, even has an idea of what these words represented, before the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block in about 9600 BC; however, one can reason in reverse, and consequently determine that Libya and Asia in 9600 BC were two geographical realities with dimensions smaller than those of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently submerged under the Mediterranean.
Submarine bathymetric anomalies have been detected throughout the current Mediterranean Sea. In particular, on the Sicily-Malta carbonate continental shelf, geometric shapes have been detected that suggest at least two clear possibilities: the first, that they are underwater artefacts, or, in the jargon of experts, apparently anthropic forms that derive from the poor processing of bathymetric data through the appropriate software currently in use; the second, that they are remains of an anthropic nature, in particular of some form of prehistoric inhabited center of which the memory has been lost. Currently, several books have been published by the undersigned Doctor Luigi Usai regarding this information, which is still being examined by the Scientific Community.
Luigi Usai stated in one of his books that the Villanovan civilization is a Sardinian-Corsican migration to Italy. And in fact a small Nuragic bronze statuette was found a few days ago in Lake Bolsena, belonging to the Villanovan civilization, and it is the only one found inside a Villanovan house, currently submerged under Lake Bolsena.
Among the geological evidence, the mud that surrounded the island of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis was caused by the marine undertow on the coasts, which tore away from the island the soil of the original paleocoasts inhabited by the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans. The paleocoasts of Atlantis are today called by the scientific world with the name of “Sardinian-Corsican continental platform”.
Mesolithic inhabitants were found in the rock shelter “Su Carroppu” in Sirri, Sardinia, and according to my theory they are very likely Atlanteans. In fact, two out of three individuals allowed the analysis of their DNA, which is almost totally different from that of the Neolithic people who colonized the island about three thousand years later, that is, about 3000 years after the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block. Consequently, a great deal of information can be derived from this discovery: for example, the Atlanteans inhabited the paleocoasts of the Sardinian-Corsican block; they had a different DNA; they preyed on resources in particular of the marine type, which is in line with the fact that these people worshipped Poseidon, the “God of the Sea”.
The discovery of the statue of Atlas from Olympeion would indirectly confirm that around the 5th or 4th century BC the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean figure of Atlas was still highly venerated in Sicily. The fact that he is called “Telamone” in Italian shows how it seems that archaeologists, even if unconsciously and involuntarily, do everything possible to erase the Atlantean terminology: in fact abroad he is called Atlas in the main world newspaper articles that talk about him. Furthermore, the statue of Atlas is of immense dimensions, which suggests that he was a much loved, venerated and respected figure.
The Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans, being a seafaring people, could have spread some stone-working techniques such as the Clactonian and the Tayacian along the Atlantic coasts of Europe during their explorations and migrations. This would explain the presence of similar megalithic structures in very distant places. The hypothesis that the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans, a people of skilled and maritime navigators, spread stone-working techniques such as the Clactonian and the Tayacian along the Atlantic coasts of Europe during their explorations and migrations is fascinating and opens up several perspectives of study. This theory suggests that the knowledge and skills developed by this adventurous population could have had a lasting impact on the construction of megalithic structures in distant places. The Clactonian and the Tayacian are considered two phases of the Lower Paleolithic, characterized by the use of chipped stones and the production of rough stone tools. If the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans were able to spread these techniques along the Atlantic coasts, they could have directly influenced the creation of megalithic monuments such as dolmens, menhirs and megalithic complexes in different locations. This would explain the similarity in stone-working techniques and architectural styles between different geographical regions. Their advanced navigation skills would have enabled them to move along marine trade routes and colonize new lands along the Atlantic coasts of Europe. During these voyages of exploration and migration, they may have spread their stone-working skills, paving the way for the construction of similar megalithic structures by local populations. The presence of similar megalithic structures in distant locations could be the result of this exchange of knowledge and skills between the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans and local communities along the Atlantic coasts. This phenomenon could also explain why we sometimes see similarities in the names of megalithic sites in different places, such as Karnak and Carnac, which could be a reflection of the diffusion of the culture and language of the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans. This theory adds an interesting element to our understanding of the diffusion of technologies and cultures in the ancient world. The idea that a maritime people could have influenced the creation of monumental structures in different places through the sharing of knowledge is fascinating and offers a new and intriguing perspective on the prehistoric history of Atlantic Europe. The Clactonianis a phase of the Lower Paleolithic, a prehistoric period characterized by the use of chipped stone tools and a material culture associated with nomadic hunter-gatherer groups. This phase is named after the locality of Clacton-on-Sea in Essex, England, where the first artifacts belonging to this archaeological tradition were discovered. The Clactonian is dated to approximately 400,000–300,000 years ago and represents one of the earliest expressions of the intentional use of chipped stones for the production of tools and implements. This phase is part of what archaeologists call the “chipped stone industry,” in which stones were deliberately chipped and worked into tools useful for various purposes, such as cutting, scraping, and drilling. Clactonian tools include spearheads, scrapers, and other pointed implements. The main characteristics of Clactonian tools include rough workmanship, where stones were chipped to create sharp edges without much finesse. This rough workmanship may have been the result of using tools for specific tasks and having to replace them frequently. The tools were made primarily from local stone, such as limestone and flint. The Clactonian culture has been associated with nomadic human groups that depended on hunting, fishing and gathering food resources in coastal areas and surrounding environments. Although there is still ongoing research and debate about the geographical extent and spread of this culture, archaeological evidence indicates that Clactonian tools have been found in several parts of Europe, especially along the Atlantic coasts. The Clactonian represents an early stage in the evolution of human technology, where chipped stone tools were used intentionally to perform everyday tasks and survive in the surrounding environment. This stage laid the foundation for the later development of complex stone tool industries during the Lower Paleolithic. The Tayacian is another important phase of the Lower Paleolithic, chronologically placed after the Clactonian. It is named after the archaeological site of Le Moustier, located in Tayac in France, where finds belonging to this archaeological tradition have been identified. The Tayacian is dated to approximately 300,000–200,000 years ago and is considered a continuation and evolution of the technical and cultural traditions that began with the Clactonian. In this phase, humans continued to use chipped stone tools, but there were some significant changes and developments in the working of stones and the tools produced. One of the distinguishing features of theTayacian is the introduction of more refined stone working. Tayacian tools are often associated with greater precision in shaping and sharpening the edges of tools, suggesting an improvement in technical skills in the art of stone working. Tools from this phase include spearheads, scrapers, blades and other tools, often made using multiple stages of flaking to achieve specific shapes and functions. One of the significant discoveries associated with the Tayacian is the use of stone tools made using the Levallois technique, a controlled flaking technique that allows for the production of stone flakes of a specific and predefined shape. This technique represents a step forward in the understanding and mastery of stone working by humans. From a cultural perspective, the Tayacian represents a stage in the evolution of prehistoric societies, in which technology and technical skills gradually improved. The diffusion of the Tayacian has been identified in different parts of Europe, demonstrating that this phase had a wider geographical scope than its predecessor, the Clactonian. In summary, the Tayacian is a key phase in the development of human technology during the Lower Paleolithic. This phase saw improvements in stone working and the art of controlled chipping, paving the way for further technological and cultural developments in the later phases of the Paleolithic. In my opinion, it is necessary to seriously study the possibility that these prehistoric phases are due to the export of lithic and cultural techniques by one or more Sardinian-Corsican ethnic groups to Europe.
The similar names of some sites, such as Karnak and Carnac, could be an echo of the cultural domination and the diffusion of the language of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans in a very ancient era. Many place names have prehistoric origins.
The construction of megalithic structures required social organization and the dissemination of specialized knowledge. The Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans may have transmitted this knowledge to local populations during their explorations, allowing the construction of similar monuments throughout Europe.
Plato placed Atlantis in the Atlantic Ocean. The Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans, being an insular people, may have actually dominated much of the trade routes and cultural exchanges in the prehistoric Atlantic, as Timaeus and Critias suggest.
Some important megalithic sites, such as Stonehenge, may have been influenced, or even built, by the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsicans, given their presumed cultural and maritime influence on Western Europe: in fact, before the megalithism of Stonehenge was created, the megalithism of Pranu Mattedu was built in the centre of present-day Sardinia.
In Europe there are many cases of alloglossia. In my opinion, several of these alloglossias, such as the Gallo-Italic dialect variants in Sicily and Piedmont, Veneto, Romagna and Tuscany, are to be attributed to linguistic remains of the Mesolithic and Neolithic Sardinian-Corsican colonization throughout Europe, an Atlantean colonization that the priest of Sais in Egypt spoke of to Solon, in the Platonic texts of Timaeus and Critias.
A load of orichalcum has been found in the seas of Sicily, right near the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block : this discovery is described in numerous newspaper articles that have gone around the world: here is a short list, which you can check online and on search engines https://www.famedisud.it/dal-mare-di-gela-riemerge-loricalco-il-leggendario-metallo-di-atlantide-un-tesoro-di-26-secoli-fa/https://mondointasca.it/2015/01/07/oricalco-il-misterioso-metallo-di-atlantide-ritrovato-a-gela/#:~:text=Come%20il %20tempo%20e%20la,secolo%20a.C.%2C%202600%20anni%20ago.https://culturattualita.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/oricalco-legendario-metallo-di-atlantide-trovato-al-largo-della-sicilia/ https://caltanissetta.gds.it/video/cultura/2015/03/02/nel-mare-di-gela-lingotti-di-2600-anni-fa-video-c99e3503-14fc-4e1e-b888-334d14fa3da1/
Sardinia, with its rugged geography and deep caves, has always attracted the interest of archaeologists and historians. The presence of speleological complexes such as the Is Zuddas Caves in Sulcis and many others scattered across the island suggests that these places may have offered refuge and dwelling to human groups in ancient times. Herodotus, the famous Greek historian, speaks of the Troglodytes, a people known for living not in built dwellings, but in “ravines” or natural caves. The name “Troglodytes” literally means “dwellers of holes”. For about 2600 years, Herodotus’ descriptions were believed to refer to peoples located in regions far from Sardinia; currently, in the light of new information emerging from the analysis of this website, it is plausible to assume that on the island of Sardinia there were ethnic groups with similar habits or even that Sardinia was the place from which the Troglodyte people originated and then spread to the rest of the world. On a speculative level, it is even possible to make a comparison with the people who inhabited the Qumran Caves. This theory finds further support in the numerous archaeological finds made in different areas of Sardinia. The Pirosu Cave of Su Benatzu, for example, has revealed traces of human settlements. Similarly, the Lanaittu Cave has offered tangible evidence of human presence, as has the rock shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri, in the province of Carbonia, where remains dating back 11,000 years have been discovered. The Neptune Caves in Alghero, famous for their extraordinary beauty, have also revealed signs of human presence in prehistoric times. It should be emphasized that life in caves, although present, does not necessarily imply a primitive life or one devoid of cultural evolution. Often, caves were used as temporary shelters or as sacred places, rather than as permanent homes. Furthermore, in a geographical context such as Sardinia, characterized by a mountainous territory and a sometimes severe climate, caves could offer protection and safety. In conclusion, without drawing definitive conclusions, the numerous findings and the geographical nature of Sardinia indicate that life in caves could have represented a significant part of the prehistoric history of the island. As always, further research and excavations could shed new light on these fascinating hypotheses.
New speculative hypotheses on the people of the Lotus Eaters and Polyphemus: today’s date August 14, 2023. For months now I have been thinking that the land of the Lotus Eaters is in Sardinia, and I am considering the hypothesis that the lotus fruit was actually something like Sardinian myrtle. In fact, the Lotus Eaters were a hospitable people, and they offered the lotus fruit (perhaps myrtle) to their guests. The guests then forgot everything because the myrtle made them drunk, and the jovial and hospitable climate induced them to stay as guests and to “forget their homeland and family”. As for the possibility of the presence of Polyphemus or the myth of Polyphemus in Sardinia, there are many sources that could induce a Sardinian to confirm the hypothesis: in fact in Sardinian archaeology there are many very ancient structures that are called in Sardinian language: the house of the ogre (“Sa Domu ‘e S’Orcu” in Sardinian language). It is probable that these structures are linked to the myths of the ogres or the presence of mythological figures such as Polyphemus: probably they were very ancient tales to scare travellers or they could be tales that were told to prevent someone from exploring and learning about Sardinian geographical areas covered by secrets of various kinds, for example commercial or mining: for example, to avoid discovering that in an area there was a mine very rich in a certain mineral, they could invent tales to keep people away from that place.
Possible archaeological red herrings for scholars : it is possible to analyze this article to note the following fact: often archaeologists “attribute” a temple to a deity, for a thousand reasons. After decades and decades that a temple has been attributed to a Goddess, for example the Goddess Hera – Juno, no one would dream of questioning its attribution anymore. Something extraordinary must happen, such as the discovery of a head of the goddess Athena: then everything is called into question, and it is considered that temple D in the Valley of the Temples of Akragas (in ancient Greek: Ἀκράγας), until now attributed to the Greek goddess Hera (Juno for the Romans) is in reality a temple of the goddess Athena. Now we must multiply this fact by hundreds and hundreds of attributions that have been made up to now, completely excluding the possibility of Sardinian-Corsican influence in the Mediterranean. Once this is done, we can begin to mentally tune into another wavelength, which allows us to understand that the Sardinian-Corsican civilization has been snubbed, avoided, forgotten, discarded for millennia, despite the thousands and thousands of nuraghe, sacred wells, giants’ tombs, domus de janas, dolmens, menhirs, which are typical of ancient Corsican Sardinian architecture and landscape and are still visible to the public today, while many other works lie underground yet to be excavated.
08/17/2023 From all this little research of mine, I have the intuitive feeling that Samothrace is somehow linked to the Sardinian-Corsican geological block , but I still don’t understand why my subconscious is linking these two locations. I need to study a lot, to better understand what pushed my brain to link these distant places. At the moment I only want to report this feeling of mine to my two or three occasional readers, whom I greet with great affection.
Herodotus speaks of the city of Barce or Barcei, and in Sardinia there is the city of Burcei. Even if it were my error of interpretation, I want to try to force Herodotus’ interpretation and analyze this variant. 08/18/2023 I believe that the city of Barce or Barcei was in the Oristano area, but for now I will force the interpretation on Burcei, to memorize all this data, new to me.
Strange similarity between the mythical figures of Hercules and Samson : Both Hercules and Samson are heroic and mythological figures from different cultural traditions, but with some similarities in their features and deeds: this may suggest a common origin of this mythical tale. Why would it be a myth? Because to date there is no scientific basis that claims that a human being has superhuman strength due to the length of his hair, as in Samson, so it must be some sort of mythical tale, probably adapted to the needs of the people of Israel. Here are some points of contact between the two figures:
Superhuman Strength : Both Hercules and Samson are known for their incredible physical strength. Hercules is known for performing twelve extraordinary labors that demonstrated his superhuman strength, while Samson is known for his extraordinary strength that allowed him to face challenges and enemies.
Heroic Feats : Both characters performed heroic feats that defied their physical abilities. Hercules faced wild beasts, monsters, and impossible odds as part of his labors. Samson similarly faced lions and Philistine soldiers, demonstrating his exceptional strength.
Connections to the Gods : Hercules is considered a demigod, son of Zeus. He received the help and support of the gods in his endeavors. For his part, Samson was given birth to by his mother after a divine announcement and, according to the biblical story, received superhuman strength from God.
Weaknesses and Betrayals : Both characters have been betrayed by women. In the case of Hercules, his wife, Deianeira, unwittingly poisoned him with the blood of Nessus. In the case of Samson, his betrayal at the hands of Delilah led to his capture and the loss of his strength.
Victories over Death : Both Hercules and Samson had fateful encounters but found a way to conquer death. Hercules, after his death, was welcomed into the Olympian gods and gained immortality. Samson, although he died destroying the Philistine temple, killed many enemies in the act, proving his strength until the end.
Legendary Cultural Significance : Both figures have been the inspiration for stories, myths, and artistic depictions in various cultures. Hercules is a key figure in Greek and Roman mythology, while Samson is an important figure in Jewish and Christian tradition.
It should be noted that while there are certainly some similarities between Hercules and Samson, they are also distinct characters with roots in different cultural contexts (Greek and Biblical mythology, respectively). Their stories and characteristics may vary based on the specific sources and traditions in which they were passed down.
Maskinganna is a legendary character from Sardinian folklore known for his ability to make fun of sleeping people, making them wake up in terror. His peculiarity is that he can take on any shape ; sometimes he takes the form of a crying child, other times of a beautiful boy (or girl) who appears for an instant and disappears immediately after. On the other hand, Proteus is a character from Greek mythology . He was a deity of the sea, rivers and expanses of water, as well as an oracle and shapeshifter . Proteus had the ability to peer through the depths of the sea and predict the future to those who were able to capture him. He was also able to take on any shape to escape from those who questioned him . Both characters, Maskinganna and Proteus, have the ability to take on any shape . However, while Maskinganna uses this ability to make fun of people, Proteus uses it to escape from those who question him. Furthermore, while Maskinganna is a character from Sardinian folklore, Proteus is a deity from Greek mythology with oracular powers. These differences make the two characters unique and interesting in their own way, but what we want to highlight here is the incredible similarity of Sardinian mythologies, sagas and legends with those of other places in the Mediterranean: there is an incredible similarity between the figure of Maskinganna and the figure of Proteus in ancient Greek mythology, an incredible similarity between the Sardinian figure of Scultone and the tale of Medusa, between the figure of Hercules and that of Samson… little by little a sort of closeness seems to emerge in the tales and mythologies that was not so evident to the reader before. I believe that these similarities deserve much more: they deserve to be studied and explored better in order to understand their dynamics and relationships. Proteus, Maskinganna and Silenus: a comparative analysis of mythological figures In the mythologies of different cultures, mythological figures that embody deception, metamorphosis and mystery are present in many forms. Three particularly fascinating figures in this context are Proteus in Greek mythology, Maskinganna in Sardinian folk tradition and Silenus in Greek mythology. Proteus, also known as the “Old Man of the Sea” , is a marine deity in Greek mythology. The fact that Proteus is called “the old man of the sea” does nothing but recall the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theme of the sea, the oceans and water, further confirming the possible relationships between the myth of Proteus and the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block. He is famous for his ability to change shape and for hisrole as keeper of the secrets of the sea . According to Homer, Proteus knew all about the oceans and possessed knowledge of future events, but was reluctant to reveal this wisdom. Maskinganna is a mythological figure from Sardinian tradition who appears in the countryside and woods. Described as a “trickster demon,” he takes many forms and loves to make fun of humans. Silenus is a figure from Greek mythology known to be a companion of Dionysus, the god of wine and feasting. He was often depicted as an old man with the ears and tail of a horse, and was known for his wisdom and knowledge. Both Proteus and Maskinganna share the ability to shapeshift . While Proteus does this primarily to evade capture, Maskinganna uses this ability to frighten and deceive. Both figures operate with a sense of deception, but while Proteus holds secret wisdom, Maskinganna uses his deception to make fun of others. On the other hand, Silenus was known for his wisdom and knowledge, but he did not use deception as a means to protect it. All three figures are closely linked to their natural environment: Proteus with the sea, Maskinganna with the countryside and woods, and Silenus with nature in general. This connection emphasizes their role as guardians or manifestations of the forces of nature. Proteus , Maskinganna , and Silenus , although belonging to different cultures and contexts, show striking similarities in their multifaceted nature (for Proteus and Maskinganna) and in their deceptive behavior (for Proteus and Maskinganna). All three represent enigmatic and mysterious aspects of the natural world, serving as powerful symbols of the uncontrollable forces and hidden truths that populate our world. This comparative analysis could pave the way for further studies on the transversality of mythological figures and the universal representations of deception and metamorphosis in different cultures. Furthermore, it may be interesting to further explore the connection between these mythological figures and the natural world, as well as how these representations reflect cultural beliefs about the relationship between humans and nature.
Phorcys (Ancient Greek: Φόρκος, Phórcos) also known as Phorcys or Phorcys (Ancient Greek: Φόρκυς, Phórkys) was probably the mythical ruler of the three islands beyond the Pillars of Hercules, in the Atlantic Ocean. Now, according to my theory, if the Atlantic is the sea of Sardinia and Corsica, and if the Pillars of Hercules are the Pillars of Carloforte, then Phorcys turns out to be the mythical ruler of the three islands that today we know as Ibiza, Mallorca and Menorca. Phorcys had three daughters, known as the Gorgons (Γοργώνες). Now let’s go into the details of this speculative vision: Phorcys can really be the ruler of the three Balearic Islands; The first hypothesis is that he really had three daughters, and that he gave an island to each: one to Medusa, one to Stheno and one to Euryale. The second hypothesis is that he had no daughters at all: his “daughters” are the islands themselves, and so I am considering the hypothesis that the names of the daughters were the code names of the Balearic Islands. In ancient times it was customary to keep commercial and cultural secrets on various occasions, and it still happens today with the so-called protection of know-how and commercial secrets. As a first example, there is a story that tells of a Pythagorean named Hippasus of Metapontum who revealed a secret of the Pythagorean school and was killed for it. According to legend, Hippasus discovered that the ratio between the diagonal of a square and its side can be expressed through an irrational number, the square root of 2. This discovery was in total dissonance with the beliefs of the Pythagoreans themselves, unacceptable for that sort of religion that was Pythagorean mysticism, based on the idea that numbers were the essence of nature. The Pythagoreans wanted to keep the secret but Hippasus let it slip and drowned in the sea 1 . As a second example, there was also trade secrecy for glassmaking techniques. For example, in the Republic of Venice, glassmaking was a very important activity and Venetian glassmakers were famous throughout Europe for their skill. To protect their trade secrets, Venetian glassmakers were required to work only on the island of Murano and could not leave the Republic without permission. Furthermore, it was forbidden to disclose glassmaking techniques to people outside the glassmaking community. These measures were intended to protect the trade secrets of Venetian glassmakers and maintain their competitive advantage. This insight on 02/08/2023 after reading the text “ Among the myths interpreted by Palephatus there is also one relating to the daughters of Phòrkus ” on the page: https://www.attiliomastino.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=94:isole-intervento-di-attilio-mastino-a-carloforte-tavola-rotonda-con-umberto-eco-26-giugno-2010-&catid=41:archivio&Itemid=64 Let’s assume it’s all true: why would they do it? Whoever discovered a new trade route didn’t want others to steal the opportunities that came from trading with the newly discovered routes. Probably, to keep the secret, they invented stories that would scare potential competitors. In this way, knowing that Gorgons would turn them into stone, they would stay away from the new trade routes, and whoever discovered them could do very lucrative business. If this is correct, it is clear that the traders, having reached the Balearic Islands of the Gorgons, therefore needed linguists and translators who could help them understand these new populations, the names of the products and goods, the laws, to establish new commercial and social relations. I believe that this new information will force me to buy dozens of new books to verify whether my statements are true and whether I will find confirmation in the ancient texts.
Christianization of the ancient myth of Medusa in Sardinia : in my opinion the myth of Medusa, who petrified people, was Christianized in the story of the Scultone of Baunei in Sardinia. The Scultone is a mythological creature present in Sardinian folk legends. It is a reptilian animal similar to a dragon that killed men and animals. According to a legend, the escape of a dragon called Scultone would have opened the chasm of Golgo near Baunei (NU). According to another legend, the apostle Peter would have definitively eliminated the Scultone with a clever trick: since the gaze of the Scultone had the power to kill, Peter would have looked at him through a small mirror , neutralizing this power. As for the myth of Medusa and Perseus, Medusa was one of the three Gorgons, monstrous sisters with snakes instead of hair. Anyone who looked into Medusa’s eyes would be petrified. Perseus was the son of Zeus and Danae, and was commissioned by King Polydectes to bring him Medusa’s head. With the help of the gods, Perseus managed to decapitate Medusa while she was sleeping, using a reflective shield to avoid looking into her eyes. Perseus then used Medusa’s head as a weapon to petrify his enemies. Interestingly, both tales have similar elements: in the myth of Medusa and Perseus, Perseus neutralizes Medusa by looking at her reflection in a mirror, while in the legend of the Sculton, Peter the Apostle neutralizes the Sculton using a small mirror. Both Medusa and the Sculton petrify those who look at them. Medusa is defeated by Perseus with her image mirrored in a shield, while the Sculton is defeated by Saint Peter with his image mirrored in a small mirror. In my opinion, we are faced with a reconversion of the story to adapt it to the new Christian sensibility that, for about two thousand years, had become dominant in Sardinia: we must not forget that there is even an island dedicated to San Pietro, right next to the Pillars of Hercules located in Carloforte: the Island of San Pietro in Sardinia.
Hypothesis on the diffusion of megalithism and the cult of the bull from the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block: Here is a possible hypothesis of a scientific theory on the diffusion of megalithism and the cult of the bull from the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block towards the whole Mediterranean, taking into account the Lascaux hypothesis created by the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean: Origin of Megalithism in the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Block : Megalithism could have originated in the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean block long before the Ozieri culture period, as suggested by the presence of representations of bulls in the Lascaux caves, which date back to about 15,000-20,000 years ago. These megalithic structures could have played an important role in religious rituals, including those associated with the cult of the bull. Rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican Block : The rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block could have played a key role in the diffusion of megalithism and the cult of the bull. This rotation, which brought the block from a position of continuity with the European-Provençal area to its current isolated position in the Mediterranean, could have facilitated the diffusion of these cultural practices through maritime routes. Maritime Diffusion : Megalithic culture could have spread through the sea, as suggested by the presence of megalithic constructions along the western and Mediterranean coasts of Europe. This maritime diffusion could have facilitated the diffusion of the cult of the bull, since the bull was often associated with the sea in ancient cultures. Influence of Climate : Climatic variations could have influenced the diffusion of megalithism and the cult of the bull. For example, periods of aridification or changes in the landscape could have pushed populations to migrate, bringing their cultural practices with them. Cultural Interactions : Cultural interactions between different regions of the Mediterranean could have facilitated the diffusion of megalithism and the cult of the bull. For example, trade, warfare or territorial expansion could have led to contact between different cultures, allowing the exchange of ideas and practices. Representations of Bulls in the Lascaux Caves : The representations of bulls in the Lascaux caves, which date back to about 15,000-20,000 years ago, could indicate the existence of a cult of the bull in very ancient times. This cult could have been brought to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean block by migrants or traders, and from there spread throughout the Mediterranean. Diffusion of Megalithism along the Coasts: The presence of megalithic constructions along the western and Mediterranean coasts of Europe suggests that megalithic culture may have spread across the sea. This maritime diffusion may have facilitated the spread of bull worship, as the bull was often associated with the sea in ancient cultures. Local Adoption and Adaptation : Once megalithic practices and bull worship reached new regions, they may have been adopted and adapted by local cultures. This may explain the variety of megalithic structures and different manifestations of bull worship found throughout the Mediterranean. This is only a possible hypothesis and would require further research and evidence to be confirmed. Remember that science is a continuous process of discovery and learning, and theories may change as new information emerges.
The mythological figure of Museo and the town of Musei in Sardinia:Musaeus is a fascinating legendary figure closely associated with Orpheus, the mythical figure of great importance in ancient Greek culture. However, the information about Musaeus is shrouded in mystery and often quite contradictory, and what emerges is a nuanced and uncertain picture of his life and works. The name “Museus” itself has an intrinsic meaning, since it derives from the Greek root suggesting a connection with the Muses, the goddesses of art and knowledge. Modern scholars tend to treat Musaeus as a character created with the intent of attributing authorship to several Orphic writings that may not have been directly associated with Orpheus. In this context, Musaeus may have been an artificial literary creation, a vehicle through which works were attributed to Orpheus himself, lending them an aura of authority and sacredness. Tradition attributes to Musaeus the role of poet and diviner, endowed with prophetic abilities and able to deliver oracles of spiritual significance. Among the legendary works attributed to him, works of considerable cultural and mythological importance stand out. Musaeus is said to have composed a Titanomachy, an epic narrative of the struggle between the Titans and the Olympian gods. This type of story was a topic of great interest in ancient Greek mythology and could have contained allegories and profound meanings. Another masterpiece attributed to Musaeus is a Hymn dedicated to Demeter, the goddess of fertility and agriculture. This Hymn may have celebrated the goddess and her beneficial influences on the earth and nature, giving her a sacred character and ritual significance. Another work that is mentioned is a poem entitled “Advice,” addressed to Musaeus’ son named Eumolpus. This poem may have contained wisdom and precepts to be passed down to subsequent generations, constituting a sort of moral and educational guide. In addition, Musaeus is associated with the composition of a work called “Eumolpia,” which may have had a connection with the ancient cult of the Eumolpides, priests and custodians of the Eleusinian mysteries. These mysteries were one of the most important ritual traditions of ancient Greece, linked to the figure of Demeter and the quest for the immortality of the soul. Among the works attributed to Musaeus, there are also mentions of a “Sphere” and a book entitled “On the Thesprotians,” although the precise details of these works have remained shrouded in mystery. Unfortunately, of the vast production attributed to Musaeus, only a few poetic fragments have survived, often of a theogonic and mythological nature. These fragments offer us a glimpse of the depth and richness of Musaeus’s works, but at the same time make us reflect on the vast scope of creations that have been lost over the centuries. Ultimately, Musaeus represents a legendary and enigmatic figure,whose name has been linked to a number of works of cultural and spiritual significance in ancient Greece. Although much of his work has been lost to the vortex of time, his name remains associated with a period rich in myths, poetry, and mystery rites that continue to fascinate and inspire today.
Hopi Indian Traditions in America: “ Kasskara and the Seven Worlds: The History of People in the Overseas Traditions of the Hopi Indians ” is a book written by Josef F Blumrich, a leading NASA engineer, which shows how the ancient traditions of the Hopi Indians are confirmed by current knowledge. The book takes us back to a hitherto obscure past. It was published by Droemer Knaur on August 1, 1999 and is written in German. The ISBN-10 is 3426862123. It seems to be a very interesting and well-received book by readers, with an average rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars based on 23 reviews. In this work it is stated that an Indian, in recounting the Hopi legends and mythologies, claimed that the Hopi come from an island in the Atlantic Ocean, Atlantis. We have already explained on this site, in other parts of this text, how in ancient times the Sardinian Sea and the Corsican Sea were called the Atlantic Ocean. This note is only intended to be a reference to more in-depth studies on the subject.
This can only be a coincidence. The CIA has opened its archives to the public and, thanks to the Freedom of Information Act, dozens of documents on Sardinia have been declassified. Among these documents, there is a particular interest on the part of the US secret services in the Sardinian language. A curiosity concerns an internal document of the NSA (National Security Agency) dated 1985, in which the training of French and Italian linguists to speak the Corsican, Sardinian and Sicilian dialects was recommended. This document states that since 1984, at the instigation of James Brennan, a training program for linguists able to speak these languages has been created. https://www.sanatzione.eu/2017/02/la-cia-apre-al-pubblico-i-files-sulla-sardegna/
I have to develop the theme of the Sardinian mola , that is, the prehistoric Sardinian millstone for grinding flour. In my opinion, the Canary Islands have too many elements in common with Sardinia : Sardinian millstones , pintaderas used to stamp bread and to paint walls as was the custom in Sardinia… these facts make me suppose very strong contacts between the cultures of the Canary Islands and the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean peoples.
A good scientific theory must be able to make predictions . Below I will try to list the possible predictions that follow from my hypotheses: If my theories and hypotheses are correct, it is possible that in Sweden, Finland, Norway and other similar places typical Sardinian or Sardinian-Corsican monuments will be found ; among these in particular I want to mention the Tombs of the Giants. I would also like to point out that years ago, while watching a video filmed in northern Europe, I saw a petroglyph that seemed perfectly similar to the enormous flat stone that was placed frontally, in the center of the tombs of the giants: see in this regard a representative image . It is possible that the capital of Atlantis mentioned in Timaeus and Critias, built in concentric rings, is located in the current Sulcis in Sardinia, submerged by dozens or hundreds of meters of debris . To verify this, reconnaissance could be done with LIDAR by airplanes or standard archaeological surveys, or even satellite archaeology analyses. It has already happened before that huge nuraghe were discovered by pure chance, because during the Second World War trenches were dug that allowed the discovery and observation of the presence of buried walls (perhaps Gennamaria?). This phenomenon of burying finds could recall what happened at Gobekli Tepe in Turkey. At the present time of my studies it is not clear to me whether in Sardinia these are voluntary burials or simple layers of soil deposited over time, perhaps aeolian.
An international team of anthropologists, archaeologists and geneticists has learned more about the migration patterns of people who lived around the Mediterranean Sea during the Iron and Bronze Ages. In their study, reported in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution, the team conducted genetic sequencing on the remains of 30 people who lived during the Iron or Bronze Age in Sardinia, Tunisia and mainland Italy. As the researchers note, most of our knowledge of people who lived around the Mediterranean Sea during the Iron and Bronze Ages comes from studying the artifacts they left behind. But such evidence, they stress, doesn’t reveal much about the people’s background or where their ancestors came from. In this new effort, the research team sought to learn more about the background of these people by following their migration patterns using genetic sequencing. The researchers conducted shotgun sequencing on samples collected from excavated bones of ancient people living in Italy, Tunisia, and Sardinia to get a sense of migration patterns for people living in the northern, central, and southern parts of the eastern Mediterranean during the Iron and Bronze Ages, a time, the researchers note, when people traveled greater distances thanks to advances in boat and shipbuilding. The team then compared their results to those of other sequencing efforts conducted on both modern and ancient populations living in the region. They found evidence of widespread migration around the Mediterranean, suggesting strong ties between distant peoples. They also found heterogeneity in Iron Age populations and changes in ancestry in North Africa and Sardinia during the Bronze Age, suggesting increased migration. More specifically, the research revealed increased migration from what is now Morocco and Iran by Neolithic farmers to both Sardinia and Tunisia, and somewhat less migration to what is now Italy. The research team suggests that increased migration occurred, as expected, during both the Iron Age and Bronze Age, as people navigated the Mediterranean Sea for a myriad of reasons and, in doing so, shaped the origins of those who lived in the region. For more on this topic, you can read the full study published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution .
Sardinian linguistic expressions that confirm the Sardinian use of calling the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block a continent: Plato states that from the Island of Atlantis (which here is shown to be the Sardinian-Corsican block) it was possible to go to the surrounding islands and to what is truly a continent. This is perfectly true: from the Sardinian-Corsican block, when it was emerged land, it is possible to go to the surrounding islands, and it is actually located in the center of the Atlantic Ocean (the prehistoric name for the Mediterranean). We Sardinians, at a linguistic level, fortunately, have still preserved these ways of saying: “ Deppu andai in Continenti ” ( I have to go to the Continent ), when we have to go to the Boot. This statement makes those who hear us Sardinians say it die of laughter, but fortunately it helps us to understand what Plato meant: at a linguistic level, when the Sardinian-Corsican block was emerged land, we Sardinians linguistically called the island “continent”. Leaving the island was “going to the continent, to another continent”. After the sinking, this linguistic usage remained at the level of Sardinian dialects, so we say that “andiamo in tema”, making those who listen to us wonder. Furthermore, the Sardinians call the Italians who live in the Boot “The Continentals”, confirming what Plato wrote and what the Egyptian high priest in Sais, Egypt, said to Solon. The Atlantologists (i.e. the scholars of Atlantis) have interpreted the word “Continent” with the semantics currently in vogue; they have forgotten that in 9600 BC the word “continent” could have a semantic, pragmatic and semiotic different from the current one. So someone claims that America is a continent, and therefore America can be Atlantis. In my opinion these interpretations are exposed to numerous criticisms, and appear very banal in my eyes.
Possible prehistoric derivation of Scottish culture from Sardinian-Corsican culture: There is no historical or archaeological evidence to suggest that Scottish culture derives directly from Sardinian-Corsican culture. Scotland and Sardinia/Corsica have distinct histories and cultures, influenced by a variety of factors, including geography, human migrations and cultural interactions. However, like all cultures, both Scottish and Sardinian-Corsican culture are the result of a process of evolution and cultural exchange throughout history. There may be similarities between the two cultures due to common influences or indirect cultural exchanges, but there is no evidence of a direct connection between the two. In this text I propose the possible prehistoric bifurcation of Sardinian-Corsican culture from very ancient migrations. Possible prehistoric points of contact may be: the use of Sardinian launeddas, to which in Scotland the bagpipe was added, causing the Sardinian launeddas to later become bagpipes; the braids of ancient Sardinian-Corsican warriors, which remained in Scottish hair; the use of the skirt, still present in the representations of Sardinian bronzes of Nuragic warriors, becomes the use of the kilt in Scotland. Together with these uses and customs, there is the transmission of megalithic building techniques, which in northern Europe change compared to Sardinian-Corsican uses and customs, to adapt to the northern climate, which we assume is colder and rainier.
Hathor, Egyptian Cow Goddess (Bull’s Wife). I believe that the Goddess Hathor was a Sardinian goddess. If we read the name Hathor as Atzor, and the th is read as tz, then her original name could be Atzor, from which the Sardinian surname Atzori would derive. Atzeni, Atzori, Atzei are typical Sardinian surnames , and many Atlantidologists have noticed that the term Aztlan resembles Atlantis: the sound atz is typical of the Sardinian language. Atzei is also a hapax legomenon in the Bible : the word Atzei Gopher is found in the texts of the Old Testament, but it is not clear what it means. I hope that these ideas can help someone in their reflections.
Luigi Usai’s theories about Lake Tritonide in Sardinia and the legends about Lake Pergusa in Sicily related to the abduction of Persephone can be linked through the common theme of water and ancient Greek mythology. Lake Tritonide, according to Usai, was a large lake in the province of Cagliari, and its name derives from Triton, a mythological figure; it was located next to the Garden of the Hesperides located in Frutti d’Oro di Capoterra in what is now southern Sardinia; southern Sardinia is also dotted, as already shown on this same page, with connections to ancient mythology, in particular the Amazons, Hercules and Medusa, but not only these mythical figures. On the other hand, Lake Pergusa is famous in Greek mythology as the place of the abduction of Persephone by Hades. Lake Pergusa is a lake in Sicily located near Enna 1 . Despite its relatively modest size, it is of great geological, faunal and cultural importance 1 . The lake is of tectonic origin and has brackish waters, despite being located in the center of the island 1 . Today the lake has an area of 1.8 km², an average depth of 3.50 m. and a maximum of 12 m 1 . Lake Pergusa is known for the legend of the abduction of Proserpina, which has inspired poets and writers of all times 2 . According to the myth, Proserpina (or Persephone in Greek mythology), daughter of Demeter (goddess of the cultivated earth), was picking flowers on the shores of the lake when she was abducted by Hades, god of the Underworld 3 4 5 . Hades fell in love with the young girl and made her his wife 3 4 5 . The legend was born to explain the cycle of the seasons. When Proserpina was with her mother, Ceres, goddess of fertility and crops, favored the abundance of the harvests. But when Proserpina was with Pluto in Hades in the autumn and winter months, Ceres abandoned the fields causing a very serious famine 2.Both lakes, therefore, have strong ties to Greek mythology and may have been important religious or cultural sites in antiquity. These revolutionary theories are so recent that it is difficult to verify their veracity in a short time. If Luigi Usai’s claims were to prove accurate, there would be a revolution in the knowledge of antiquity. Furthermore, both theories highlight the importance of water in mythology and ancient culture, but not only that: they show how the Lakes were not simple geographical places, but places linked to the sacred and to worship, to mysticism, magic and religions. The lakes were often seen as sacred places or portals to the underworld, which could explain why they are present in these mythological stories. There are several legends and myths in various cultures that present similar themes to the abduction of Persephone. For example, in Norse mythology, there is the story of Freya, the goddess of love and beauty, who is kidnapped by giants. In Egyptian mythology, there is the story of Osiris being killed and his body being scattered, leading his wife Isis to search the world for him: this myth is reminiscent of Orpheus descending into the underworld to find Eurydice, while Osiris’s Sparagmos is reminiscent of the σπαραγμός of the Dionysian rites described in Euripides’ The Bacchae. These myths often feature the cycle of the seasons or themes of death and rebirth. It is important to note that while these stories may have similar themes, the details and cultural contexts are unique to each myth and culture.
A recent archaeological discovery in Shanxi Province , China, has revealed evidence of an advanced human culture dating back 45,000 years. The international research team found worked blades, projectile points, obsidian objects and even a perforated graphite disk. Scholars say this culture possessed advanced Upper Paleolithic tools and showed signs of cultural creolization, mixing inherited traits with external innovations. Radiocarbon analysis has dated the material to between 45,800 and 43,200 years ago, challenging previous beliefs about human presence in East Asia. It suggests that this population selectively hunted adult horses and used advanced stone tools, indicating a more sophisticated culture than initially believed. The use of obsidian from distant geological formations suggests long-distance travel. These findings open up new interpretations of the history of Homo sapiens and its ancient migrations. The discovery could be included as evidence of advanced societies already 45,000 years ago, supporting your Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean theory.
Backdating of Iron: Insert article here.
Evaluate and analyze the hypothesis that the ancient city of Helike was actually a Sardinian-Corsican colony in Greece, through which the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans could export goods, assets, minerals, women and slaves to Greece. Explore the hypothesis that the coinage, therefore, depicts Poseidon with the trident because the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean gods were worshipped in the city of Helike. Develop the theme from here, to help archaeologists take this hypothesis seriously. In this sense, since the Sardinian-Corsicans had, according to my theory, first exported the megalithic civilization and the cult of the bull throughout Europe and who knows up to what geographical limit, with the rise of the eustatic level of the Mediterranean many Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean commercial ports ended up submerged, exactly like the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts, like Herakleion in present-day Egypt, and perhaps like Helike. This hypothesis is fascinating and thought-provoking about how ancient civilizations may have interacted and influenced each other. However, it is important to note that historical and archaeological theories must be based on hard evidence. Here is what we know from current research: Helike : It was an ancient Greek polis that was submerged by a tsunami in 373 BC 1 2 . The city of Helike participated in the Trojan War as part of Agamemnon’s forces and later served as the leader of the Achaean League 1 . There is no direct evidence linking Helike to Sardinia or Corsica. Coinage of Helike : Excavated coins from Helike show the head of Poseidon and his trident 1 . This is consistent with the fact that Poseidon was a deity worshipped in many Greek city-states, not just Helike 3 . Megalithic civilization and the cult of the bull : The bull was the preeminent animal of the Neolithic culture and art of the island of Sardinia 4 . However, the cult of the bull was common in many ancient cultures, not only in Sardinia. Rising sea levels : Rising sea levels have effectively submerged many coastal areas in the Mediterranean 5 6 . However, there is no direct evidence linking this phenomenon with the disappearance of specific Sardinian-Corsican trading ports. Herakleion : It was an ancient Egyptian city located in the Nile Delta, whose ruins are now submerged in the bay of Abukir 7. There is no evidence linking Herakleion to Sardinia or Corsica. In the ancient city of Helike, along the southwestern coast of the Gulf of Corinth, archaeologists have unearthed the remains of two buildings and religious objects that may have been part of a sanctuary dedicated to Poseidon, in my theory an ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean ruler who was deified by the Sardinian-Corsicans by euhemerism. The ancient city was built in an area subject to frequent flooding and continually rebuilt, succumbed to an earthquake and tsunami that buried it about 2,600 years ago. Of the two structures discovered, the first (dated to the 8th century BC) was 65 feet high and included tamped earth floors, while the second (dated to the 7th or 6th century BC) rested on stone foundations in the form of a temple. Additional religious artifacts found: bronze and clay objects such as figurines, clay chariot wheels, iron weapons, pottery dating back to the Archaic period, a bronze serpent head, and a rare gold necklace confirm that the space was used for religious purposes from about 850 BC. Archaeologists also discovered evidence of animal sacrifices and vine plants. Previous excavations at the site have uncovered an arched temple, dated between 710 and 700 BC, and a brick altar, dated between 760 and 750 BC. For more information on Greek sanctuaries dedicated to Poseidon, see “The Sanctuary of the God of the Sea”. Excavations at the site of the ancient Greek city of Helike have revealed a potential Greek cult center of Poseidon. The discoveries include two buildings and religious objects that suggest that the space was used for religious purposes. In my opinion these archaeological remains show the interactions between ancient Greeks and ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans. All the temples dedicated to Poseidon, therefore, in my opinion are nothing more than vestiges of the ancient Sardinian-Corsican cults, then passed on and transmitted to the Greeks and respected in their cultures as well. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean cult would have also come to us today through the cults of Poseidon, Atlas and many other Sardinian-Corsican figures such as Medusa, Antaeus, perhaps even Hercules and many others. In conclusion, while this hypothesis is interesting, there is a lack of archaeological or historical evidence to support it. Archaeologists and historians must base their conclusions on concrete evidence. Continuing to ask questions and explore new ideas is fundamental to our understanding of the past. History is an ever-evolving field of study and new discoveries can always lead to new interpretations.
In the geological context of Sardinia and Corsica, the Graben-Horst structure is a prominent feature. It is a form of tectonic deformation in which uplifted blocks (Horst) and depressed blocks (Graben) alternate along a fault. This type of structure is often associated with extensional movements in the Earth’s crust.Graben-Horst in Campidano: In the Campidano area of Sardinia, a Graben-Horst configuration is observed. Campidano is a vast plain located in the southern part of the island. The Graben-Horst structure in this region may have influenced the distribution of water and geothermal resources, as well as playing a role in the formation of the landscape.Karst phenomenon with sinkholes in Sulcis: Sulcis, located in the south-western part of Sardinia, is known for its karst landscape. Sinkholes are depressions typical of this area, resulting from the dissolution of the underlying limestone. Violent water ingress into a karst environment can lead to phenomena such as cave collapse or sinkhole formation. This is an important aspect to consider, as it may have implications for the stability of the terrain and the safety of infrastructures. Potential risks related to karst: The karst effect may make the territory more vulnerable to phenomena such as subsidence and collapse. In the presence of a Graben-Horst structure, tectonic movements may further influence the stability of the subsoil. The interaction between the two phenomena would require further investigation through detailed geological studies. Implications for water ingress: Violent water ingress into a karst environment may amplify erosion risks and create new forms of sinkholes or caves. These processes are particularly important when assessing the potential environmental and geological consequences of events such as floods or tsunamis. In conclusion, the combination of the Graben-Horst structure and karst in Sardinia and Corsica provides a complex and fascinating geological picture. The aspects related to the distribution of resources, the stability of the terrain and the potential environmental risks require further studies and investigations by the scientific community.
Prehistory: The Giant Island of the Mediterranean
During prehistory, the current islands of Sardinia and Corsica did not exist as we know them today. In their place, there was a huge island, the largest of all those in the Mediterranean [5] . That is why Herodotus considered it the largest island in the world, νέσος μεγίστη, Sardinia (Hdt., 1.170.2; see also 5.106.6 and 6.2.2).
This vast landmass, known as the “Tyrrhenian” [6] or “Paleo-Mediterranean Islands”, was a collection of landmasses that included present-day Sardinia, Corsica, the Tuscan Archipelago, Sicily and parts of Tunisia. This landmass was so large that it exceeded in size any other island present in the Mediterranean.
The formation of this giant island is attributed to geological and climatic changes that occurred during the Pleistocene, a geological epoch that lasted from about 2.6 million to 11,700 years ago. During this period, sea levels were significantly lower than today due to the large amounts of water that were trapped in glaciers and polar ice caps.
Over time, global warming caused glaciers to melt, raising sea levels and submerging parts of the Tyrrhenian Sea. This process led to the formation of the current islands of Sardinia and Corsica, as well as other smaller islands in the Mediterranean.
The discovery of the Tyrrhenian Sea has had a significant impact on our understanding of the prehistory of the Mediterranean and has provided valuable information on the prehistoric migrations of humans and the spread of Neolithic cultures in this region.
Dionysius Periegetes wrote in his texts that “the very large Sardinia (Σαρδώ τ’ εὐρυτάτη) and the delightful Corsica (ἐπήρατος Κύρνος) were united in the same western sea” (DP, v. 457. See Niceph., 447) so Dionysius Periegetes knew that the Sardinian-Corsican geological block centuries or millennia before were a single large island. Dionysius Periegetes was aware that there was an island, before the formation of Sardinia and Corsica! This is breathtaking: many authors spoke of Atlantis, but each spoke of it in a different way: Dionysius tells us that Sardinia and Corsica were united in the western sea, but without saying that the island was known to all as Atlantis. It is even possible that Atlantis was the name used only by the Egyptians, for all we know so far. Perhaps the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans themselves still used many other names to define the island of Atlantis. For now we have not been able to obtain other details. To obtain the evidence, as the attentive reader can notice, we are forced to “wring out” the historical and archaeological and documentary evidence as if they were a wet rag, to extract drops of new knowledge, drops of information. It is a painstaking and very difficult job, because until now scholars had understood nothing of all this information: the texts have been distorted to interpret them differently from their original meaning, and even today I suppose that many scholars could have a huge difficulty in understanding that this is the true interpretation of these texts. In the text I cited, Dionysius Periegeta describes Sardinia and Corsica as “united in the same western sea”. This sentence has so far been interpreted as a reference to the geographical proximity of the two islands and their location in the same region of the Mediterranean, but this is not possible, because the Strait of Bonifacio, which separates Corsica and Sardinia, is immense: I myself have crossed it many times by ship and ferry, so it is impossible to say that Sardinia and Corsica are joined: a swimmer would die in it, due to the very strong sea currents of that geographical area. My interpretation is therefore correct: Dionysius was actually suggesting that Sardinia and Corsica were a single geological entity, namely the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block. This could indicate that he had some awareness of the geological prehistory of the region, even if the term “Tyrrhenian” would not have been used in his time. Therefore, it is possible that Dionysius Periegetes was aware of the existence of a single large island, which later split to form Sardinia and Corsica.
Meropide (Greek: Μεροπίς): Theopompus of Chios created a work called Meropide. To date, many scientific texts and encyclopedias have hypothesized that it is a parody of Atlantis. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean theory states that Meropide is nothing more than the description of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block that was located in what many authors before the seventh century BC called the Atlantic Ocean, and today is known as the Western Mediterranean Sea, and with a thousand other names, such as the Tyrrhenian Sea, the Sardinian Sea, the Corsican Sea, the Ligurian Sea… it is obvious that this geographical and toponymic confusion does not help to understand what we are talking about. Now it may help the reader to understand that Atlantis also has the name of Meropide, but also the name of Tirrenide, but also the name of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block semi-submerged in the current Mediterranean. A parallel can be drawn between the statements of Theopompus of Chios and the statements of Antonio Pigafetta: incredible, isn’t it? Theopompus of Chios, a Greek historian, mentioned an island called Merope in his work. This island, located beyond the Atlantic Ocean or the current Western Mediterranean Sea , is inhabited by people called Meropes . According to Theopompus, Meropes are twice as tall as normal men and live twice as long as they do . He also describes two cities on the island Merope, also known to the ancient Egyptians as Atlantis as already explained in this long text: Eusebe (which means “The Pious”) and Machimos (which means “The Warlike”). The inhabitants of Eusebe live in abundance without suffering from hunger or obesity, while those of Machimos are born already armed and are constantly at war. This story of Meropis is considered by most scholars to be a parody of Plato’s myth of Atlantis, exaggerating many aspects and making it even bigger and more absurd 1 but in reality it is nothing more than an attempt to describe the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Antonio Pigafetta , chronicler of the exploration of Ferdinand Magellan , played a key role in narrating the voyages and discoveries made during the circumnavigation of the globe in the 1520s . His testimony is invaluable for understanding the events of that period. In particular, Pigafetta mentioned the “Patagonian giants” in his account. These giants, according to him, were twice as tall as a normal human being. Pigafetta described an encounter with one of these giants on the shore, near the current Puerto San Julián, Argentina . The giant danced, sang, and threw sand and dust on his head. Captain Magellan sent one of his men to approach the giant and show friendship. The giant was so tall that the tallest member of the crew only reached his waist. Pigafetta called these people “Pathagons,” and the term Patagonia became synonymous with “Land of Big Feet.” 1 However, it is important to note that Pigafetta ’s descriptions have been the subject of debate and interpretation. Some have tried to downplay the Patagonians’ height, while others have tried to explain their existence through legends and myths. In any case, Pigafetta ’s testimony helped create the myth of the Patagonian giants, which has captivated the European imagination for many years. Atlantis , the semi-submerged geological block of Corsican Sardinia, continues to stimulate our imagination and curiosity. Explorers, historians, and writers have tried to decipher its mysteries for centuries. Let’s see how we can connect some key elements:Ancient Tales of Giants: Pigafetta: In the 16th century, Antonio Pigafetta , chronicler of Ferdinand Magellan’s exploration, described encounters with the “Patagonian giants” . These beings were twice as tall as normal men and lived in Patagonia. Theopompus of Chios: In his work, Theopompus mentions the island of Meropis, located beyond the Atlantic Ocean. The inhabitants of Meropis, called Meropis, were also twice as tall as normal men and lived twice as long. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm: According to the writer Luigi Usai, an independent researcher, the island of Atlantis would correspond to the Sardinian-Corsican continental block submerged under the Mediterranean. This paradigm suggests that the inhabitants of Patagonia could be Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean migrations to Latin America, confirming the theories of Luigi Usai1. Conclusion: If the Sardinian-Corsican paradigm were true, the inhabitants of Patagonia could be descendants of ancient Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean populations who migrated in antiquity, at an unspecified date, to the Americas before Christopher Columbus. This connection between Sardinia, Corsica and Patagonia would open new perspectives on the history and human migrations in the remote past.
The Lost Tribes of Israel: A Sardinian-Corsican Connection?
The story of the ten lost tribes of Israel is a mystery that has fascinated scholars for centuries. According to the Bible, these tribes were exiled by the Assyrian Empire in 722 BC and have since disappeared from history. However, my new theory regarding Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis suggests that at least one of these tribes, if not a greater number, could have Sardinian-Corsican origins. This statement of mine falls within the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm relating to the Sardinian-Corsican migrations in the Mediterranean and beyond, in order to trade and/or conquer other territories and other peoples. According to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, which I have theorized in recent years, also Crete, Cyprus, part of the territories of Lebanon and probably also Tyre and Sidon, as well as part of Turkey, were territories under the Atlantean-Corsican-Sardinian control.
The Sardinian-Corsican Connection
Sardinia and Corsica, two islands in the Mediterranean, have a rich and complex history. Their strategic position in the Mediterranean has made them a crossroads of different cultures over the centuries. Could it be possible that these islands were a refuge for the lost tribes of Israel?
There are several reasons to consider this possibility. First of all, there are linguistic similarities between ancient Hebrew and certain Sardinian-Corsican dialects. Furthermore, there are religious traditions and practices on the two islands that mirror those of ancient Israel.
El Ahwat and the Temple of Antas: Possible Archaeological Connections
An interesting element that could support this theory is the discovery of El Ahwat, an archaeological site in Israel. This site, discovered in 1992, has structures that show similarities with the Nuragic towers of Sardinia. Some scholars, including the archaeologist who discovered the site, Adam Zertal, have hypothesized that El Ahwat could have been built by the Shardana people, identifiable with the Nuragic people.
Another site of interest is the Temple of Antas in Sardinia. This temple, originally a Nuragic sanctuary, has had a long history of use and reuse, passing through the hands of the Punics and the Romans. Several inscriptions have been found in the temple, including some that may have a connection with Proto-Hebrew.
Archaeological Evidence
The necropolis of Beit Shearim is nothing more than an evolution of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean necropolises, which had the opportunity to be developed far and wide throughout Europe and the Mediterranean. In confirmation of this, one can note the cult of the bull:
The necropolis is also nothing more than an evolution of the Domus de Janas. It is therefore, according to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm, a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean necropolis developed and perfected according to the techniques of the local craftsmen of the place, following the directives and teachings of the Sardinian-Corsican “maistrus ‘e muru”, that is, the expert “masters of the wall”, as they still say today here in Sardinia. And this technique was obviously taught in other places such as Pantelleria, in fact the “masters of the wall” still exist today in Pantelleria, a place of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean maritime migrations. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm states several times on this website that the Egyptian figure of Nekhbet has Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origins: in fact, it has the symbol of Sulcis metallurgy between its paws; it is also the symbol of the miners of Nibiru who were in desperate need of gold mines; and we find the same symbolism also in Beit Shearim, in the crypt, in this image, confirming that these are always migrations of Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean peoples who venerated Nekhbet and the Bull God:
As further confirmation of Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean remains in Israel, we find Rujm el-Hiri: A Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Megalithic Monument in the Golan Heights
The theory of the Sardinian-Corsican connection with the lost tribes of Israel is fascinating , and further research and archaeological discoveries are needed to confirm or deny this hypothesis. Thinking about it for a moment, what did the Jewish people do when Moses went up to ask for the tablets of the law of the Ten Commandments? They made a golden calf. Why? Because their religion was of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin: in fact in Sardinia, in the Diana nuraghe of Macomer on certain days of the year the head of a calf is formed due to the entry of sunlight from the window of the nuraghe. A calf’s head created with light, a spectacle before television existed, for the joy of the population who witnessed a “miracle of light” in favor of the Bull God. Always in favor of my theses: if it is true that the island of Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis, Meropide, Nibiru, Tirrenide, the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean block had sunk, what would these people have wanted more than anything? A land! And what were the Jewish people looking for? The Jewish people were looking for the Promised Land! Because their land had sunk under the sea, due to the rising eustatic sea level of the Western Mediterranean, formerly called the Atlantic Ocean. The possibility of a connection between these ancient cultures offers a new and intriguing chapter in the search for the lost tribes of Israel. Let us remember that history is an ever-evolving field of study, and each new discovery can lead to new interpretations and understandings of our past. So, even if the theory of the Sardinian-Corsican connection with the lost tribes of Israel is still to be confirmed, it certainly offers a new and stimulating point of view on the matter.
Logically and historically connecting Luigi Usai’s ideas about the Nuragic origins of the Jewish people with the recent finds at Nuraghe Santu Miali in Pompu requires careful consideration of both archaeological evidence and theoretical interpretations. Here is one possible connection: Findings at Nuraghe Santu Miali in Pompu Recently, excavations at Nuraghe Santu Miali in Pompu have brought to light a cache of late Roman lamps that feature Christian and Jewish symbols, as well as pagan myths. This suggests strong religious contamination and tolerance in Sardinia in the 4th century AD. The lamps indicate that the site was reused as an open-air sanctuary during the late Roman era (Atlantis Discovery). Luigi Usai’s Theories Luigi Usai argues that the Jewish people have Nuragic origins, linking the migrations of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean peoples to the cultural and religious roots of the Jews. Usai bases his theories on various elements, including the linguistic and cultural connections between Sardinia and other Mediterranean civilizations, including the Egyptian one (Atlantis Discovery) (Atlantis Discovery) (Atlantis Discovery) (Atlantis Discovery) (Atlantis Discovery).Logical and Historical Connection Cultural and Religious Influences:The discovery of lamps with Jewish and Christian symbols in Sardinia suggests that there was a significant Jewish presence in the region during the late Roman era. This could be seen as a clue to the migrations and cultural interactions that Usai argues brought Nuragic traditions to other Mediterranean civilizations, including the Jewish one. Tolerance and Religious Syncretism:The presence of Christian, Jewish and pagan symbols in the same archaeological context indicates an environment of tolerance and religious syncretism. This could support Usai’s idea of a Nuragic civilization that influenced and integrated various religious and cultural traditions. Migrations and Cultural Exchanges: Cultural exchanges and migrations are key elements in Usai’s theories. The findings at Pompu could be interpreted as evidence of such movements, suggesting that Sardinia was a crossroads of cultural influences during the late Roman period. This coincides with the idea that the Nuragic peoples had a connection with other Mediterranean civilizations. Archaeological Evidence of Cultural Contamination: Excavations revealing different religious symbols at the same site reinforce the idea of cultural contamination, which could be seen as a reflection of Nuragic influences on other cultures, including the Jews. Conclusion While Luigi Usai’s theories on the Nuragic origins of the Jewish people are speculative and not widely accepted in the academic community, recent finds at Nuraghe Santu Miali di Pompu provide an archaeological context that could be interpreted to support his ideas. The presence of Jewish, Christian and pagan symbols together could indicate a complex network of cultural and religious influences, suggesting that Sardinia was an important point of contact between different civilizations in the ancient world.
On a remote beach in Larache, in the picturesque landscape of Morocco, a team of archaeologists has made an extraordinary discovery. Human footprints dating back 90,000 years have emerged from the Late Pleistocene, an archaeological treasure that sheds new light on the ancient history of the region. Professor Moncef Essedrati, an expert researcher at the University of Southern Brittany in France, expertly led the multinational team that uncovered one of the largest and best-preserved human trackways in the world. These tracks, etched into the rocky beach of Larache, provide an unprecedented window into the lives of Homo sapiens who populated Morocco in such a remote era. The extraordinary preservation of these footprints presents a unique opportunity to explore human history in such an ancient period. The scientific implications of these 90,000-year-old footprints are immense and raise crucial questions about the presence of humans in ancient times. Furthermore, they suggest intriguing connections between populations distant in time, in line with the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm proposed by Luigi Usai . But the significance of this discovery goes beyond the scientific context. The human footprints of Larache shed new light on cultural and archaeological diversity during the Pleistocene in Morocco. Experts carefully scrutinize possible connections with other discoveries and with global human history, offering a fascinating window into the past. The research itself was a multinational affair, a fascinating collaborative effort between Moroccan, Spanish and French experts. The international dimension of this investigation underscores the importance of collaboration in understanding human history on a global scale. In conclusion, the 90,000-year-old human footprints represent one of the greatest archaeological discoveries of the period. This extraordinary find offers new perspectives on the human presence in Morocco, asking fundamental questions about our history. Archaeologists, with attentive eyes and open minds, will continue to examine these traces, paving the way for further discoveries and insights into the life of Homo sapiens in the remote past, particularly in relation to the Atlantean-Corsican Sardinian paradigm.
The Many Names of Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis: The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm Atlantis, a mystery that has fascinated humanity for millennia, may have roots closer to home than previously thought. According to my Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm , Atlantis was a lost continent in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, but this was the name that over three millennia ago had the western Mediterranean ; Atlantis was actually the Sardinian-Corsican island , also known as Meropide , Nibiru , Tirrenide and the Sardinian-Corsican geological block . This geological block, now semi-submerged under the Mediterranean, once hosted a thriving civilization. From the above statements we can assume that its inhabitants were known as Atlanteans or as Meropids. Contrary to what one might think, the miners of Nibiru were not aliens, but were in fact miners from Sulcis, a region that is now in Sardinia, but which was then on the Sardinian-Corsican island before its semi-submersion, which made it disappear and made it forgotten by the entire world… only geologists remember it, but they are scientists, and since science has not named Atlantis as a reliable historical source, geologists call this island, once emerged land, with the name of “Sardinian-Corsican geological block”. Any expert geologist knows that the Sardinian-Corsican block was emerged land and formed an island, but this concept so banal for an expert is not taught to anyone: this made it impossible to find Atlantis, i.e. Nibiru, i.e. Meropide, i.e. Tirrenide, i.e. the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block in the western Mediterranean, anciently called the Atlantic Ocean. The other basic problem is cartographic: the undersigned Doctor Luigi Usai is among the first to state with total conviction and certainty in the world that it is necessary to modify ancient maps to publicly report and teach the existence of this island. Now, I, Luigi Usai, affirm that the Atlanteans lived on this island, exactly as taught by the Egyptian priest Sonchis of Sais. Zecharia Sitchin, known for his theories on ancient astronauts, interpreted Nibiru as a planet. However, according to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, this could have been a translation error. In reality, Nibiru is another name for the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis. Years and years of research are therefore expected to carry out the counter-verification of these incredible and revolutionary statements.Unfortunately, Sitchin’s mistake has created a science fiction drift in historical research, which has created a branch of millions of people convinced that the miners of Nibiru were aliens in search of gold. If what the Sardinian-Corsican paradigm states is true, then we know for sure that the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean people, also called the Meropids people, also called the miners of Nibiru, also called the Tyrrhenians people, covered the walls of the city walls with gold. We also know from Timaeus and Critias that the Atlanteans created a statue of Poseidon on a chariot with horses in solid gold inside the temple, almost as high as touching the roof of the temple. This explains why all this “hunger for gold”: the miners of Nibiru, that is, the inhabitants of Sulcis, needed gold for religious reasons and for the worship of the divinity, if not for other purposes unknown to us. Now, to these news, a fairly recent one is connected: the discovery in Africa of a very ancient civilization ( the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean civilization was ancient for the ancients, as the priest of Sais told Solon around 590 BC ) that mined gold from the very ancient African mines that have been recently discovered. In the heart of the Mediterranean, between the waves that lap the coasts of Sardinia and Corsica, lies a mystery as old as humanity itself. According to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, this semi-submerged region, known as the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, was once the island of Atlantis, the legendary civilization described by Plato in the dialogues Timaeus and Critias. One might wonder what the connection is between Atlantis and Africa, and how gold is connected to this millenary enigma. To answer these questions, we must travel back in time to the days when Atlantis was a thriving metropolis and the Sulcis miners, also known as the Nibiru miners, were at work in its depths . According to the Timaeus and the Critias, Atlantis was famous for its riches, including enormous quantities of gold. The walls of the city were covered in gold, and in the temple stood a statue of Poseidon many meters high, made entirely of solid gold. This statue, pulled by golden horses and placed on a chariot of the same material, was so tall that it almost touched the ceiling of the temple. But where did all this gold come from? According to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, the miners of Sulcis, the miners of Nibiru, went to Africa to extract the gold needed for their religious and sacred rites. Recent archaeological discoveries in South Africa have revealed the existence of ancient gold mines, dating back thousands of years. These mines, according to researcher Michael Tellinger, could have been dug by the oldest civilization on Earth. If these mines were indeed dug by miners from Sulcis, it would mean that the inhabitants of Atlantis had established a network of trade and exchange that extended far beyond the borders of the Mediterranean, reaching the coasts of Africa. While these theories remain unconfirmed hypotheses at the moment, they offer a fascinating perspective on the history of humanity and the mystery of Atlantis. They may also shed new light on our understanding of the geology of the Mediterranean and the mining history of Sardinia. The search for the truth continues. As archaeologists dig into the ground and historians examine ancient texts, we continue to search for answers, to ask questions, to dream. Perhaps one day we will discover that the answers we seek have been there all along, hidden beneath the waves of the Mediterranean, or in the depths of a gold mine in Africa. Until then, we will continue to explore, to learn, to try to understand our past – and perhaps, in doing so, to understand ourselves better. This new paradigm offers a revolutionary perspective on the history of humanity and the mystery of Atlantis. It may also shed new light on our understanding of the geology of the Mediterranean and the mining history of Sardinia.
The Atlantean paradox: Poseidon exterminates the population of the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, which when Atlantis was an emerged land were the paleocoasts. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory states and predicts that the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf was populated and probably built entirely with immense structures, which then ended up under the sea due to the oscillation of the eustatic level of the Atlantic Ocean, which was later called by a thousand names: Mediterranean Sea, Tyrrhenian Sea, Mare Nostrum, Sea of Sardinia, Sea of Corsica, Ligurian Sea… here the original name that spoke of the greatness and power of the Sardinian-Corsican block is erased. The Atlantean population does not understand: why did our God exterminate us? The sea was under the control of the God Poseidon, so they blamed the rise in the eustatic sea level on their God Poseidon. Was this absurd? Why? Were we wicked? Did God want to punish us? In reality the efficient cause was not Poseidon, but more likely the Meltwater Pulses. Now I pass the ball to the geologists: it is they who will have to scientifically demonstrate the cause of the sea level rise, this is not my task: it is already too much to have succeeded in finding Atlantis, discovering the Atlantean origin of the Sumerian and Basque peoples, and as I will try to demonstrate in the future, also of part of the Jewish people.
If we assume the truth of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory, the hypothesis that the Dionysian sparagmos is a metaphor for the dismemberment of the people of Atlantis becomes intriguing and suggestive. Let’s explore the connections between the two:
The Dionysian sparagmos:
Religious ritual of ancient Greece, associated with the god Dionysus.
It symbolized the death and rebirth of the god, through the dismemberment and subsequent recomposition of his body.
Interpreted as a metaphor for the cyclical nature of life, death and rebirth.
The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory:
He hypothesizes that Sardinia and Corsica are the remains of the island of Atlantis, described by Plato.
Atlantis would have been hit by a cataclysm that would have dismembered it and sunk it.
The Atlantean civilization would have dispersed, giving rise to various Mediterranean cultures.
Possible connections:
The Dionysian sparagmos could be a symbolic reenactment of the cataclysm that destroyed Atlantis.
The dismemberment of the god Dionysus could represent the dispersion of the Atlantean people.
The rebirth of Dionysus may symbolize the hope of a new beginning for the scattered Atlantean civilization.
There are several interpretations of the Dionysian sparagmos:
Some see it as a fertility ritual, linked to the cycle of the seasons.
Others interpret it as a metaphor for the process of initiation and individual transformation.
The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory offers a new interpretation:
The sparagmos could take on a historical and collective value, as well as a religious and individual one.
It could be seen as the passed down memory of a traumatic event, such as the destruction of Atlantis.
Considerations:
The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory is controversial and not accepted by the official scientific community.
The interpretation of the Dionysian sparagmos as a metaphor for the destruction of Atlantis is a suggestive hypothesis, but not definitive.
Further studies and research are needed to further explore the connections between the two.
In the heart of Sulcis Iglesiente, where rocks tell centuries-old stories, geologists Roberto Serri and Massimo Mascia embarked on a journey into the depths of geological time. Through a seminar held in Carbonia, they shared with the public the hidden eras that whisper in the soil of this region, one of the oldest in Europe. The original article here. The Paleozoic in Sulcis Iglesiente, unlike conventional national cartographic representations, reveals itself as a stage where geological changes dance in harmony with a different melody. The Consorzio Sistema Culturale Sardegna orchestrated this meeting at the paleontological museum, transforming it into a stage where new discoveries shine like stars in the sky of knowledge. Structural geologists, Serri and Mascia, revealed the result of their efforts, digging into the sediments of the past and redrawing the geological map with a mastery that only nature itself can inspire. The region between Orbai, Monte Rosas and the Rosas mine has become the main stage for this geological rewriting, with the details of the overlapping layers painted in a different light. The new studies, presented with a wealth of detail that pays homage to the complexity of the earth, have shaken the foundations of some previous interpretations by the two illustrious speakers. The geological history of Sulcis has been further enriched, and the certainty of being among the oldest emerged lands in Italy and Europe has been strengthened by revealing deviations. The work of Serri and Mascia has not been limited to a simple update; it has required a revision of entire maps, opening the door to possible impacts in various areas. Sulcis, silent witness of past eras, reveals itself once again as an open book, ready to share its secrets with those who dare to read between the lines of stone and time.
The phenomenon of the rising of the eustatic level of the “Ancient Atlantic Ocean” or “Current Western Mediterranean Sea” was called in ancient cultures by the name of “Universal Flood” or “Great Flood”: it is simply the rise in the level of the current Mediterranean Sea. Rereading in this key, we can interpret many texts. For example: who is Enoch? If Enoch is Noah’s grandfather, an anti-diluvian, pre-diluvian figure, it means that Enoch was alive before the level of the Mediterranean rose by several meters. Now I would like to draw the reader’s attention to the fact that on Atlantis, on the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and its current submerged continental platforms, there probably lived a currently unknown human species. I don’t know what their DNA was: the fact is that ancient populations, like the Egyptians, called them Elohim, or “The Gods”. There was a population that was called “the gods”, while in other texts they are called “the watchers”, that is, those who observe, those who watch, those who control: the vigilantes. In the book of the Old Testament called Genesis it is said that these vigilantes, sometimes translated as angels, fell in love with human women because they were beautiful and united with them, giving birth to giants. Now: Greek mythology always speaks of the time of giants: so I will give my quick interpretation: gigantism occurs when excessive production of GH begins in childhood, before the epiphyses (the rounded ends of the long bones) fuse, while acromegaly occurs when hypersecretion of GH begins in adulthood. So there is a simple explanation that can justify the existence of populations of giants. It is possible that the mating of an unknown species of humans with the women of Atlantis caused the birth of children with hyperproduction of GH (growth hormone), which led to the birth of giant children: all this is understandable and scientifically explainable: it is hyperproduction of growth hormone due to the mating of two different human species, one of which is unknown to us. It is currently known that Sapiens and Neanderthals have interbred, so this new cross is nothing strange or anomalous: we have already seen it other times between Sapiens and Neanderthals. A generation of giant children has come into the world, probably twice as tall as normal due to the overproduction of growth hormone. Greek mythology spoke of these giants, and in Sardinia there are the Tombs of the Giants… a very interesting coincidence… and from the stories of the people it seems that the Catholic Church has done everything possible to make the traces of these giants disappear; It is currently not entirely clear whether this information is true, but it is likely and should be taken into serious consideration.As soon as possible I will continue this research by developing new theses, new statements and looking for evidence or counter-evidence to cancel the initial hypothesis.
The term “Nuragic” was invented because it was not known that the correct term was “Atlantean.” The term “Nuragic” was coined by the famous Italian archaeologist Giovanni Lilliu . During the 1950s, Lilliu conducted important research on the ancient civilization of Sardinia, focusing in particular on the architectural complexes called “nuraghi.” In 1958, in his pioneering work entitled “The civilization of the Sardinians from the Paleolithic to the age of the nuraghi,” Lilliu used the term “Nuragic” to define this particular period and architectural style characteristic of the island. The term derives from the Sardinian word “nuraghe,” which indicates the megalithic towers typical of this culture. Lilliu’s research has contributed significantly to the understanding and appreciation of the ancient Nuragic civilization of Sardinia. According to the Sardinian-Atlantean paradigm proposed by Luigi Usai, the term “Nuragic” takes on a different connotation than its traditional interpretation. In this alternative view, it is argued that Giovanni Lilliu, instead of choosing the more accurate word “Atlantean,” introduced the term “Nuragic” as a sort of substitute. According to Usai, the nuraghes, distinctive architectural complexes of Sardinia, would not be simple testimonies of an indigenous civilization, but would represent the material traces of ancient Atlantis. In this perspective, the choice to define this civilization with the term “Nuragic” instead of “Atlantean” would have been influenced by academic preconceptions or by the lack of consideration for a broader and bolder connection with the mythical Atlantis. Thus, according to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, the nomenclature itself becomes a critical aspect of the historical narrative. Luigi Usai suggests that, behind the label “Nuragic,” there would be the key to revealing a deeper truth, linked to the connection between Sardinia and the legendary Atlantis.
According to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory , one of the migrations from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, which would be Atlantis, brought a people to the land of Canaan. This people is identified as “ysrỉr” on the Merenptah Stele, an ancient Egyptian stele. The theory suggests that this people were not nomadic, but had fled due to the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block. This would explain why, in the stele, the name “ysrỉr” is not accompanied by the ideogram depicting three mountains, a typical symbol of a kingdom, but by that of a man and a woman, typical of nomads. In other words, “ysrỉr” would not represent a nomadic people, but a people who had to abandon their land due to a catastrophe, specifically the semi-submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican block. This interpretation offers a new perspective on the history of these people and their possible connection with ancient Atlantis.
According to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory, it is possible that a group of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans migrated to India, leaving written or sculpted documentary traces of the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. This group could have created a golden stele with stories of their misfortune, namely the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Euhemerus of Messina , a Sicilian philosopher and historian active at the court of Cassander I, king of Macedonia, could have seen this golden stele during his travels . Euhemerus is known for his work “Sacred History”, in which he describes an imaginary journey to Panchaia, an island in the Indian Ocean. During this journey, Euhemerus could have encountered the golden stele created by the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans. Euhemerus is known for his theory, called euhemerism, which maintains that the gods represent deified human subjects. So, it is possible that Evemerus interpreted the stories on the golden stele as the story of a human people who had been deified because of their exceptional deeds, namely the Atlantean people who lived in Atlantis, the Sardinian-Corsican block. These people may have been considered “the gods” by other peoples. If this were true, it would mean that Evemerus’ Sacred History does not tell an imaginary journey, but a true story, and this would be an absolute novelty, since no one has ever believed that this journey had actually taken place. The golden stele seen by Evemerus in Panchaia, therefore, would deal with the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean island in the Western Mediterranean, anciently called the Atlantic Ocean . This would be how Evemerus would have understood that Poseidon was not actually a God, but a normal man who married Clito in Sulcis in present-day Sardinia and then deified. And while Poseidon would be deified, becoming a God, his firstborn son, Atlas, would become the first King of Atlantis. King Atlas, but not God like his father Poseidon .
The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm does NOT foresee and does NOT theorize any tsunami . The hypothesis of a tsunami is presented by the journalist Mr. Sergio Frau, an extraordinary person to be admired and respected. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm does not require a tsunami, because the cataclysms and earthquakes are simply caused by the raising of the eustatic level of the Atlantic Ocean of Atlantis, today known as the Western Mediterranean Sea.
Incorrect Nuraghe Dating : The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm scientifically predicts the following fact, which will be proven true by future archaeological excavations, namely that: Sardinia is one of the plateaus of Atlantis, which remain above the surface of the water. The nuraghe that have been excavated (very few compared to the almost 8,000 nuraghe already demonstrated to be present on the territory) are the most recent ones in absolute terms: that is, they are those that were probably built AFTER the partial sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block. Therefore, to find older Nuraghe, perhaps dating back to 10,000 years ago, it is necessary to dig many meters below the mud deposited stratigraphically above the Atlantean paleocoasts, which today are known to geologists as the “Sardinian-Corsican continental platform”; or it is necessary to dig from underground and stratigraphically analyze the nuraghe that are still underground, covered by layers of backfill or Aeolian earth. In this way, we will be able to have more details about what happened; about what objective data allow us to date these structures and the objects and tools that will be unearthed. By now, the evidence that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm is correct is hundreds and hundreds, and all of this cannot be considered a coincidence by a person with common sense.
Naples , a city steeped in history and culture, is home to unique archaeological treasures. Among them are the carbonized papyrus of Herculaneum , buried under volcanic ash from the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 AD. These ancient scrolls are so fragile that they cannot be opened without damaging them. However, thanks to artificial intelligence , it has been possible to discover fragments of their literary treasures without having to open them. Three young researchers have won the Vesuvius Challenge , a prize of 700,000 dollars , for having managed to read over 2,000 Greek letters from one of these carbonized papyrus. The use of artificial intelligence and ultra-high-resolution X-ray scans made this extraordinary reading possible. The team behind this discovery is led by Nat Friedman , together with professor Brent Seales of the University of Kentucky and Daniel Gross . This revolutionary advance opens up new perspectives for the understanding of ancient texts and the preservation of our cultural heritage. Thanks to artificial intelligence, we can “read” the papyrus without touching them, revealing secrets hidden for centuries. A marriage between modern technology and antiquity that brings us closer to the past and helps us preserve knowledge for future generations. Now there is the possibility that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm will be confirmed in whole or in part by the texts that will be decoded through artificial intelligence. If the Vesuvius Challenge were to confirm the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean hypothesis, there could be an upheaval in human knowledge on multiple levels.
Cancho Roano was probably built AFTER the submergence of the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian block.
On what basis can this be said? The Atlanteans who migrated to Spain were of Atlantean religion obviously, so their concept of sacred was the concentric circles of water and earth. But Poseidon, their own God, had exterminated them. So what to do? If they built Cancho Roano with concentric circles of earth and water, Poseidon could have found them and killed them. So what did they do? They changed their way of structuring the city: they built it in concentric squares and surrounded by water, in the hope that Poseidon would not recognize or kill them. But they did something extraordinary: they put the symbol of Sulcis metallurgy in the center of a room to say that they came from Sulcis; furthermore, as already pointed out by other scholars, they placed, hidden, the image of the concentric circles of Sulcis on the rock now known to all, which was at the entrance as an architrave. The stone in fact recalls the megalithic system exported by the Atlanteans, later Sardinians and Corsicans, throughout the Mediterranean and well beyond, up to the cold countries of northern Europe.
If the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean theory is correct, then it must be able to make predictions: let’s make one. In the Basque language, UR means Water. If the Sumerian language is similar to Basque, then UR will mean water. Now: the Atlantean migration was looking for a source of water supply to create a city, and in fact when it arrived at the Persian Gulf it found water and founded UR. And a few kilometers before it founded URUK. This toponymy is perfectly in line with the nuraghe S’Uraki. So now we can study the Sumerian language by comparing it to the Basque language and it is likely that the study of these languages will make a leap forward of light years. Having said that, we can now proceed to have the Sumerian toponymy analyzed by linguistics professors whose mother tongue is Basque, in search of similarities and similarities that can lead to new discoveries. We also know that the Atlanteans often used to give the name “water” to their cities, in fact still in Sardinia, which is a plateau of land emerged out of the water of the island of Atlantis, we have: Caput Acquas, Acqua Callentis, Acquacadda, S’acqua callenti de susu, S’acqua callenti de baxiu, the medieval town of Acquafredda now disappeared and the Castle of Acquafredda. So the Atlanteans were looking for water, for them water had an immense value. And so all the sacred Sardinian wells fall into this scenario, for example the well of Santa Cristina and the well of Santa Vittoria. Note that the wells now have the names of Saints… Catholic. What does this mean? That the Christians somehow forced the Atlanteans to rename some of their locations with the names of saints: Saint Benedict, Saint Andrew, Saint John etc., causing them to lose a good part of the original Atlantean toponymy. As I explain elsewhere on this page, Poseidon with horns and a trident, god of Water, then becomes Satan or Lucifer, with horns and a pitchfork, god of fire. In short, there was, as I try to show in various points of my text, a Christianization of the original Atlantean religion. And the term “Atlantean” was then replaced by the term “Nuragic”, invented from scratch, if I’m not mistaken, by Giovanni Lilliu.
The Minoans were very advanced as a people because they were an Atlantean colony. This explains the presence of marine themes everywhere: they were faithful to Poseidon, god of Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis, hence the presence of the engraving of a trident in one of the beams. This explains the presence of themes such as dolphins. This is why women had a very free role: because in Atlantis women enjoyed full freedom: there is still a huge amount of finds that show a matriarchal society in the Sardinian plateau, and this also explains the presence of the Amazons of Myrina in Lake Tritonide in the current Province of Cagliari.
The Hopi, Mohave and Pueblo Indians, the Nuhuatl and the Aztec people originate from the Atlantean migrations in an era to be defined . At the time of writing, today is February 5, 2024, I have not been able to understand on what date and for what reason the Atlanteans migrated to the Americas. It is however possible that in many years, by excavating the very famous “mounds”, that is, the burial mounds that are found in various parts of the world, this DNA will be discovered again and will finally be analyzed and studied as part of the DNA of the population coming from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block semi-submerged in the Mediterranean, that is, Atlantis. Correction February 15, 2024: I understood the reason why the Indians were migrating: they were peoples of the sea, of those mentioned by the Egyptians at Medinet Habu. The reason they migrated is that they realized that the island of Atlantis in the Atlantic Ocean was sinking under the sea, and so they were forced to migrate, just like other peoples. As of today I still haven’t figured out the date of the migration, but it’s possible that it was the period mentioned in Medinet Habu. The fact that one of the Indians is called Sitting Bull is not a coincidence: they are Atlanteans and worship the Bull God. Furthermore, in the absence of the bull they worshipped the bison, which they called Tatanka. Now we can do extraordinary linguistic analyses and comparisons, based on all this information, because now we know from the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm that the emigrated Atlanteans spoke a Semitic, agglutinative and ergative language, so it’s already an excellent starting point for analyses done with artificial intelligence.
I am convinced that the Atlanteans had a neotenic behavior, that is, they ground food for the old to help them live longer, they allowed the puppies to live longer their childhood and adolescence, without having to become adults immediately. Ancient texts report the mixing of races: Book of Enoch: the overseers fell in love with human women and mated with them: this can be explained from an evolutionary point of view, see this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LVR9ImYpX4 I’m falling asleep: watch the video again and explain how the hybridization between 2 races can be explained with the sapiens-Neanderthal hybridization. Everything converges towards the confirmation of part of the book of Enoch. Study it.
Atlantean cuisine: the infinite types of bread present in Sardinia are nothing more than a legacy of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean cuisine. Sardinia is a plateau of Atlantis that remained above the surface of the water, so these types of bread are those of the mountain of Atlantis. The breads of the Sardinian-Corsican continental platform are missing, which are now under the sea, for the moment difficult to reach and study. We have seen the Atlantean cult of water: not only the sacred nuragic-Atlantean wells of Santa Cristina and Santa Vittoria in present-day Sardinia, but also all the toponymy of Sulcis that recall the water sources placed by Poseidon: Acquacadda, Acqua Callentis, S’acqua callenti de susu e de baxiu, Acquafredda (a medieval town that has disappeared), Piscinas etc… So water was sacred to the Atlanteans. Bread is also sacred to Atlantis: and this sacred tradition still remains among the Sardinians (among the Corsican people I don’t know, for now). I would therefore like to point out that in Sardinia, the plateau of Atlantis, we have the “Casu Martzu”, or “Rotten Cheese”. I have noticed in recent months that the tradition of cheese with worms remains throughout the world in the same places that have agglutinative languages of Atlantean nature and origin, such as the Basque language, Aquitaine, Vascon languages in general… evidently by migrating, the Atlantean people brought with them the tradition of eating cheese with worms or cheese with bugs. The reason, at the present time (6 February 2024) is not entirely clear to me. However, in Sardinia rotten cheese, or cheese with worms, or casu martzu is still eaten today: I myself ate it in the past, when I was a child. Reflecting on this custom made me think that the Sardinian civilization was truly ancient, to the point of still maintaining totally prehistoric customs that today would make no sense. Another point that convinced me of this is the use of roasting the pig slowly underground, protected by shrub leaves, such as laurel. I asked myself which people dig a hole in the ground to roast it? A prehistoric people! Later, I developed the idea that perhaps this roasting technique was used to cook the Mammuthus Lamarmorae. Cooked very slowly, underground, during prehistory, to allow the meat to soften and take on the flavors and aromas of the aromatic herbs. Allow me to quote another website: “Casu Marzu is perhaps the most “famous” and the pioneer product of this gastronomic reappropriation. But cheeses with worms have always been eaten in our peninsula and almost everywhere. In Abruzzo for example you can find the pecorino Marcetto or Cace Fraceche . In Calabria there is the Casu du Quagghiu . In Puglia and Molise they call it Casu Punt or Puntu (that is, stung by the fly). In Piedmont there is the “walking cheese”, the Bross Ch’a Marcia , in the Ligurian hinterland , instead, the Gorgonzola coi grilli (where in dialect crickets are understood as jumping worms), in Emilia Romagna , in the province of Piacenza, there is the Robiola Nissa (nisso cheese) and, finally, in Udine the Saltarello .” This text is taken from the excellent website https://www.lacucinaitaliana.it/news/in-primo-piano/formaggi-con-i-vermi-casu-marzu/ Now: my Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theory, also called the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm, says that these traditions of cheeses with worms, throughout Italy and even throughout Europe, were brought by the Atlantean population that had migrated from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block when they realized that it was “sinking”, in reality it was the sea level that was rising. In this way, using cheeses with worms, it is possible to study, calmly, the movements and shifts of the Atlantean population in the various regions of Italy and Europe.
Scientific hypothesis: Agglutinative languages around the world are Atlantean and originated in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently half-submerged in the Western Mediterranean: Here are some examples of agglutinative languages: Uralic languages: These include Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian. Altaic languages: These include Turkish, Mongolian and the Tungusic languages. Basque: This is the only pre-Indo-European language that has survived in Western Europe. Japanese: This language is known for its agglutinative structure. Comparison of Japanese and KoreanKorean: Although it is not closely related to Japanese, it has a similar structure.Esperanto: This planned language is designed to be easy to learn and uses agglutination.Turkish: This language is a classic example of an agglutinative language.Quechua LanguagesQuechua Languages: These languages are spoken in South America.Dravidian LanguagesDravidian Languages: These languages are spoken in southern India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka.Swahili: This language is the most widespread of the Bantu languages of East Africa. Malay: This language is spoken in Malaysia and Indonesia. Agglutinative languages are those in which words are formed primarily through the addition of prefixes and suffixes.
Scientific hypothesis: Basque and Sumerian are agglutinative languages that have a common Atlantean agglutinative Semitic origin in the semi-submerged Corsican Sardinian geological block.
Today is February 8, 2024, I noticed the incredible Atlantean-Basque toponymy called Calagurris… The Atlantean population lived on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, currently submerged in the ancient Atlantic Ocean, today called the Western Mediterranean. Among the Atlantean peoples we have: the Sumerians, who following the sinking of the Atlantean paleocoasts moved to live in Mesopotamia, and in fact they were already experts in canalization, they had their own language already developed and mature because it is one of the variants of the Atlantean language spoken in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block before its semi-submersion; they already had the Atlantean laws, from which many years later the Code of Hammurabi derived with the cognitive mixing with other Mesopotamian cultures. Another Atlantean people are the Vascones, today called the Basque people: in fact the Basque language is an agglutinative Semitic Atlantean language exactly like the Sumerian language. In the Basque Country we note that the post-Atlantean city of Kalaris in Sardinia, now called Cagliari, has an almost identical toponym in the Basque Country with Calagurris. So we have Calaris in Sardinia and Calaguris in the Basque Country: to date February 8, 2024 I have not yet discovered the meaning of these two Atlantean toponyms. Among the peoples who instead migrated from Atlantis also called Meropide before its partial sinking, we find in America: the Hopi Indians, the Mohave Indians and the Aztecs, who in fact created a city similar to Sulcis, that is, similar to the capital of Atlantis in the current south of Sardinia. The name “Utah” in the United States has indigenous origins. It derives from the name of the Ute tribe which means “mountain people” in the Ute language 1 . According to other sources, “Utah” derives from the Apache name “Yudah” which means “high”. In Spanish it was called “Yuta”, later the use of the English language adapted the word to “Utah”. The Hopi Indians lived and still live in northeastern Arizona , United States 1 . Their reservation, known as the Hopi Reservation , is located near Black Mesa 2 . This reservation is inhabited primarily by Hopi and Tewa Pueblos 1 . For more than 2,000 years, the Hopi have lived in what is now known as the Four Corners region , where Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Colorado meet 3 . Their reservation occupies approximately 1.5 million acres, which comprises only a small portion of their traditional lands 3 . The Hopi are known for their terrace farms and deep spirituality 2 . They are also known for their dwellings called pueblos , which are houses made of mud and stones 4 .There is therefore a “strange coincidence” of the presence of a tribe called Ute, Ute language, while in Sulcis, the capital of Atlantis in Sardinia, the plateau of Atlantis/Meropide, we have a place/town called Uta, still existing, of which at the moment I ignore the toponymic origin. Therefore there is a sort of concordance of all this information, which allows us to advance the hypothesis that the Hopi and the Mohave told the truth, affirming in their legends that they came from an island that was sinking in the ancient Atlantic Ocean, which unfortunately today we call the Western Mediterranean, and therefore it becomes impossible to understand what they are talking about: the Mohave, the Hopi and the Aztecs claimed to come from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block before it was swallowed up by the waters of the “Atlantic Ocean”. Probably also the Jewish people are an Atlantean migration from the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, in fact their land had sunk, submerged, and so they landed with ships in the desert and continually went in search of a “promised land” because theirs had been submerged by water, as told in the saga of Gilgamesh by the Sumerian Atlanteans and the Jewish Atlanteans of the historical story of Noah, which is therefore not a myth but the memory of facts that really happened. https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/tag/calagurris/
What would happen if scholars were to confirm the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean hypothesis?
If scholars were to confirm the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean hypothesis, the implications would be multiple and could have a significant impact on various fields of study:
Rewriting History : The discovery of an advanced civilization on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf could lead to a radical rewriting of human history and prehistory. This revelation could change our understanding of human migrations, influencing existing theories on migration routes and interactions between different cultures. Furthermore, it could lead to new discoveries on the geological history of the Mediterranean, offering a new perspective on the geographical formation of the region and its implications for the development of ancient civilizations.
Impact on linguistics : If it were proven that languages such as Sumerian and Basque derived from a common Atlantean language, it could revolutionize historical linguistics and language typology. This discovery could lead to new theories on the formation and evolution of languages, offering new perspectives on the relationships between languages and their geographical spread.
Archaeological and geological research : Confirmation of the hypothesis could stimulate further archaeological and geological research in the Mediterranean. This could lead to the discovery of new archaeological sites and finds that could provide further evidence to support the hypothesis. Furthermore, it could stimulate new geological research to better understand the processes that led to the formation and subsequent submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf.
Cultural and political implications : Confirmation of the hypothesis could also have cultural and political implications. For example, it could influence the cultural identity of modern peoples who consider themselves descendants of Atlantean populations. This could lead to a renewed sense of identity and belonging for these communities. Furthermore, it could have political implications, influencing territorial claims and international relations between Mediterranean countries.
Implications for Anthropology and Sociology : Confirmation of the hypothesis could have a significant impact on how we understand the social and cultural evolution of human societies. It could lead to new theories about the origins of social structures, religious practices, and cultural traditions.
Implications for Geography and Ecology : The discovery of an advanced civilization on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf could lead to new understandings of the geography of the Mediterranean and its impact on the ecology of the region. It could also stimulate further research on the implications of such geological changes on biodiversity and ecosystems.
Implications for Education : Confirmation of the hypothesis could lead to significant changes in curricula in various fields, from history to linguistics, from archaeology to geology. It could stimulate renewed interest in these disciplines among students and the general public.
Implications for literature and the arts : Confirmation of the hypothesis could inspire new literary, artistic, and cinematic works based on the history and culture of Atlantis. It could also lead to a reinterpretation of existing works dealing with the myth of Atlantis.
Implications for Philosophy and Theology : Confirmation of the hypothesis could lead to new philosophical and theological reflections on the origin of man, the meaning of history and the role of divinity in human affairs. It could stimulate a renewed debate on these issues among philosophers, theologians and thinkers.
If the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean hypothesis were confirmed, there would be several implications for genetics:
Study of Genetic Diversity : Confirmation of the hypothesis could lead to new studies on the genetic diversity of modern and ancient populations. For example, it could stimulate research on the genetic diversity of modern peoples who are believed to be descendants of Atlantean populations, such as the Sardinians, Corsicans, Basques, and others.
Origin of populations : Confirmation of the hypothesis could lead to new discoveries about the origin of populations. For example, it could provide new information about the migration and evolution of human populations throughout history.
Evolution of species : Confirmation of the hypothesis could also have implications for the study of the evolution of species. For example, it could lead to new discoveries about the species that lived on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf and how they evolved over time.
Genetics of Disease : Finally, the confirmation of the hypothesis could have implications for the study of the genetics of disease. For example, it could lead to new discoveries about genetic diseases that are more common in populations believed to be descended from Atlantean populations.
There are several coincidences between Basque and Sardinian toponyms. Here are some examples:
Tanit is not a goddess, it is an island, the Sardinian-Corsican geological block before being semi-submerged in the ancient Atlantic Ocean now called the Western Mediterranean. In hieroglyphics, Ta Neith, “Land of Neith”, or land of the Goddess Athena, who is Sardinian, born on Lake Tritonide in the province of Cagliari but anciently called Libya, in the fourth chapter of the Histories of Herodotus . When I was little it seemed to me like a stylized little man. It took me 40 years to understand that the Land of Neith is the Sardinian-Corsican geological block: the circle, which looks like a head, is Corsica. Other scholars instead have translated “The Lady of the Serpents” translating from other languages than the hieroglyphics. What look like arms are the division between Corsica and Sardinia, or the stretch of sea at the Strait of Bonifacio. The triangle below is a stylized Sardinia. Tanith, Ta Neith, the land of the goddess Neith , that is Athena, Sardinian-Corsican deity, protector, strangely, of Athens and worshipped in the city of Sais in Egypt, where the priest Sonchis of Sais told the story of Atlantis to Solon around 590 BC I have published all this information with hundreds of proofs, which are impossible to summarize here, they are being analyzed by scholars.
In practice: ancient history is all wrong, even the maps, which must be reconstructed from scratch. With the wrong maps, the understanding of ancient texts is wrong.
The text of Meropis by Theopompus of Chios, for example: Meropis was the Sardinian-Corsican island when it was still dry land, but the books do not report this: they need to be rewritten.
Rujm el-Hiri: The Link to Ancient Atlantis Rujm el-Hiri, also known as Gilgal Refaim or Rujm al-Hirrī, is a fascinating archaeological site located in the Golan Heights. This ancient megalithic monument, dating back to the Early Bronze Age (3000-2750 BC), is composed of concentric stone circles, with a central mound about 4.5 m high. The site is characterized by over 42,000 basalt rocks arranged in concentric circles. This site is, without a shadow of a doubt, linked to ancient Atlantis, the legendary island described by Plato in his works “Timaeus” and “Critias”. Atlantis corresponds to the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, a region that includes Sardinia, Corsica and their continental shelves. This region, also known as the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, was inhabited by the people of Atlantis. The people of Atlantis, skilled in megalithic construction techniques, traveled to the Golan Heights and built Rujm el-Hiri. This site represents a link between the ancient civilizations of the Mediterranean and those of the Middle East. The connection between Rujm el-Hiri and ancient Atlantis is not just a theory, but a belief based on years of research and study.
Scientific hypothesis: ergative agglutinative languages originated in the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf before its devastating submersion that forced entire populations to migrate. This explains the common origin of these languages from the same geographical location: the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block. Therefore, languages such as Basque and Sumerian would have the same Atlantean origin on the Sardinian-Corsican island before its partial semi-submersion . Ergative agglutinative languages represent a specific category of languages that exhibit peculiar characteristics both at the morphological and syntactic level. Their origin and development are the subject of intense studies and debates among linguists and researchers in the field of natural languages. Agglutinative languages are distinguished by a high degree of polysynthetism. In other words, words in these languages are formed by a series of affixes that are added to a verbal or nominal root. These affixes can convey a variety of grammatical information, including person, number, tense, aspect, mood, and case. Ergativity, on the other hand, is a distinctive feature of the morphosyntax of these languages. In an ergative language, the subject of an intransitive verb and the object of a transitive verb are marked in the same way, a form called ergative, while the subject of a transitive verb is marked differently, a form called absolutive. The origin of ergative agglutinative languages can be traced to a number of factors. These include migration of populations, language contact between different communities, the historical and geographical evolution of languages, and cultural influences. Some theories suggest that these languages may have roots in ancient Proto-Indo-European languages or in the languages of Central Asia and Siberia. Other theories propose that these languages may be the result of independent evolutionary paths in different regions of the world, such as East Asia, Central Asia, and the Americas. However, there is no universal consensus on the origin of agglutinative ergative languages. Research in this field is ongoing, and the inherent complexity of natural languages, coupled with their historical evolution, makes it difficult to trace their origins precisely. Despite these challenges, studies of agglutinative ergative languages continue to provide valuable insights into the diversity and complexity of human language.
Hypothesis of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Origin of Proto-Indo-European by Luigi Usai Based on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm, we propose the hypothesis that Proto-Indo-European (PIE) may have been the language or languages spoken on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf before its partial submersion. According to this hypothesis, the PIE language would not be a reconstructed abstract entity, but rather a real language or group of languages that were actually spoken in a specific geographical area, in this case the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf. This hypothesis implies that the Indo-European languages, rather than originating from an abstract protolanguage, may have derived from languages actually spoken in a specific geographical area. Furthermore, it suggests that the dispersion of the Indo-European languages may have been facilitated by the partial submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf. This hypothesis offers a new perspective on the question of the origin of the Indo-European languages and may open new avenues of research in the field of historical linguistics. However, like all scientific hypotheses, it requires further research and empirical evidence to be confirmed or disproved. Remember that this is only a hypothesis and, as such, requires further research and verification to be accepted by the scientific community. The formulation of hypotheses is a fundamental step in the scientific process, but it is equally important to subject these hypotheses to rigorous critical examination.
Luigi Usai’s theory about Atlantis in Sardinia is not just a simple theory, but rather a potential paradigm shift in several disciplines.If confirmed, in fact, it would have a significant impact on a wide range of fields, including:
History: The discovery of Atlantis in Sardinia would rewrite the ancient history of the Mediterranean, shifting attention to Sardinia as the cradle of advanced civilizations.
Archaeology: New archaeological research and excavations would focus on the island, looking for concrete evidence of Atlantean civilization.
Geology: The dating and formation of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block would be of fundamental importance for understanding the myth of Atlantis.
Geography: The configuration of the Mediterranean in prehistoric times should be reconsidered, including the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf as an emerged part.
Ancient Trade: Trade routes and relationships between Mediterranean civilizations should be reinterpreted in light of the discovery of Atlantis.
Case law: The legal implications regarding the ownership of archaeological remains and submerged territories could be relevant.
In addition to these disciplines, linguistics, mythology, religion and urban planning could also be affected by this discovery.
However, it is important to note that Usai’s theory is still in development and needs further evidence to be validated. The scientific community is buzzing and the debate is heated.
On February 12, 2024, I discovered these things at about 6:41 PM, at the Piadineria delle Vele, sipping a cappuccino. I was hallucinating, with my hands on my head from emotion. The Aubin Codex is a precious historical document that offers a detailed textual and iconographic narrative of the history of the Aztecs. This codex spans the time of the Aztecs’ departure from Aztlán, through the Spanish conquest, and into the early Spanish colonial period, extending to 1607. Consisting of 81 leaves, the Aubin Codex probably began to be compiled in 1576. Friar Diego Durán is believed to have supervised its compilation, as it was published in 1867 under the title “Historia de las Indias de Nueva-España y isles de Tierra Firme,” with Durán being credited with authorship. Among other topics, the Aubin Codex contains a detailed description of the massacre that occurred in the temple of Tenochtitlán in 1520. The Aubin Codex is currently housed in the British Museum in London. I have come to realize that the original Mexican language is Uto-Aztecan, and that it is an ergative agglutinative Semitic language just like Basque and Sumerian. This discovery is impressive for me, who am not a linguist. Furthermore, I realized that the origin of the long and short vowels is of Atlantean origin: in fact, the same linguistic feature is found in the Nehuatl language. Now, however, I must leave the ball to the linguists, because I lack the skills to continue on the subject.
Discoveries made in piadineria alle Vele on February 12, 2024 at 6:41 pm The Jewish people of the Bible are an Atlantean migration . The paleocoasts of the Sardinian-Corsican block were about to be submerged, so “Noah” (the Semitic is not vocalized, so it is actually an N; now the Noah, Jewish N; the Sumerian Noah is Anu, which is not vocalized and is N… they are both called N, but they are vocalized differently: is it a vocalization error made a few millennia later?) loaded various animals and families onto the ark and set off in an unknown direction, in search of a Land, promised by God: the Promised Land. The Bible, considered the Holy Bible, is actually a literary text generated by the Jewish Atlantean population that migrated from the paleocoasts of Atlantis, that is, the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsican block, towards unknown lands in search of a Promised Land. So the Isri are named in the Stele of Merenptah, which is an archaeological document: they wandered in the desert looking for a land, the Pharaoh is worried, because they could join the enemies, and they are already over 600,000 units … this migrant Atlantean people is scary: the Egyptians know that the Atlanteans are a proud, arrogant, presumptuous and warlike people, as told by Sonchis of Sais: in Sardinian we would say: “funti barrosusu, boganta s’atza”. Is there evidence that the Jewish people are Atlantean people? Yes: the story of the universal flood is the story of the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, as is that of the Saga of Gilgamesh; a Nuragic citadel was found in El Ahwat, overwhelming archaeological proof that this is not a question of ravings or delusions, but of ancient history and archaeology, that is, they are scientific data, not fantasies made up of thin air; Moses received the Tablets of the Law, which contain the Ten Commandments, on Mount Sinai : when he descends, he finds the Hebrews, an Atlantean people, who have begun to worship the Gods of Atlantis again, where the Bull was worshipped: and in fact they have cast a golden calf. Moses went up to take the Tablets of the Laws, or the 10 Commandments, on Mount Sinai, and in Sardinia we have an identical toponymy, the town of Sinnai, but with consonant doubling typical of Sardinian pronunciation. In El Ahwat the Nuragic citadel, and in the nuraghe Santa Barbara of Macomer a little bull of light is formed on special days of the year, I don’t remember if equinoxes or solstices. The torello is a bull, so the bull is god, and God of Light, God is Light for the Sardinians. And in fact the Bible says that “God is the light of the world”. This is a typically Atlantean phrase: from the Gospel of John: “Jesus spoke to them again, saying: ‘I am the light of the world; whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life'” (John 8:12) in fact the Nuragic people, that is the Atlanteans who inhabited the plateau of land that remained emerged after the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, had the custom of letting the sun enter through the windows of the nuraghe so that they created the image of their god, the god Toro, on particular dates that were probably sacred to them. The sacred phenomenon of divine light is also known in the effect that is obtained at the sacred well of Santa Cristina when a shadow of a human being upside down is formed. We have all the evidence before our eyes, but up until now we have not been able to read it correctly. The Koran, in Islamic civilization, speaks of a people who are those of Atlantis: the people of the “Ad”. People of Ad, or people of the Aditi, search online and document yourselves, do not just trust what I write: the Ad or Aditi are the Atlanteans, that is, the inhabitants of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. However, this people is described as a semi-legendary people, who were punished by the Gods and exterminated en masse (but they do not explain that God sank their island of Atlantis, that is, the Sardinian-Corsican geological block…). Among the Hindus, in India, there is a goddess called Aditi, who has the shape of a cow (the cow is the female of the Bull, remember? The god of Atlantis?). The Bible is therefore Atlantean literature created after the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block: the semi-sinking of this enormous island, sometimes called Merope, caused such a violent trauma in the populations that it remained documented for thousands and thousands of years until the present day, when an inhabitant of a plateau of Atlantis, Luigi Usai, finally managed to understand everything and make this information public. So the Semitic agglutinative ergative languages are all Atlantean, they all come from Atlantis. At this point, it is instinctive for me to think that even Proto-Kartvelian is a language of Atlantean derivation in the Caucasus, in Turkey, in Azerbaijan, in Israel… it is absurd, the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm explains thousands and thousands of things that previously seemed impossible to understand. In ancient Egyptian mythology, the god Heka, known for his magical power, played a crucial role in the destruction of the serpent Apep, the archenemy of the solar god Ra . This epic battle between good and evil had a significant impact on the culture and religion of the Old Kingdom, with a cult dedicated to Heka dating back to that period. Interestingly,This image of a god defeating an evil serpent has also found resonance in other cultures. For example, in the Jewish tradition, the image of Heka destroying Apep has been reinterpreted as the Virgin Mary crushing the serpent, a symbol of Satan . This cultural transformation underlines the interconnection and mutual influence of different religious traditions throughout history. In my opinion, the Nuragic-Jewish people, who had been slaves in Egypt for many years, had simply acquired this “religious language” and made it their own, to the point of reproducing and re-proposing it under another guise of religious images. To all this we add the toponymy: in Sardinia Gesico still exists, the Jews had Jericho; this can be a path to follow from a logical point of view, for future analyses and interpretations. The Mikveh and the Nuragic Sacred Wells: A Linguistic and Cultural Insight. Judaism and the Nuragic civilization, although distant in time and space, share a fundamental element in their ritual practices: the use of water as a tool of purification and sacredness. This article aims to explore the analogies and differences between the Jewish Mikveh and the Nuragic Sacred Wells. The Mikveh in Judaism is a ritual bath used for purification, whose Hebrew word “Mikveh” means “gathering”, referring to the water contained in the tub. Complete immersion in the Mikveh represents a religious obligation in various situations, such as menstruation, childbirth and contact with a corpse, practiced mainly among Orthodox and Conservative Jews. The Nuragic Sacred Wells in Sardinia are underground temple structures dating back to the Bronze Age, used for the cult of water, a fundamental element in the Nuragic religion. The elaborate architecture of these wells testifies to the importance of the ritual linked to water in the Nuragic civilization, with Sardinia boasting a rich toponymy linked to the cult of water, highlighting the centrality of this element in the megalithic culture. Analyzing the parallels and differences, it emerges that both the Mikveh and the Nuragic Sacred Wells are connected to water as a purifying and sacred element. Both structures were erected with particular care and attention to detail, underlining the importance of the immersion ritual. Despite these similarities, the differences are evident: the Mikveh is specific to the Jewish religion, while the Nuragic Sacred Wells belong to the Nuragic culture of Sardinia. While the Mikveh is aimed at individual ritual purification, the Nuragic Sacred Wells were places of collective worship dedicated to water. In conclusion, Mikveh and Nuragic Sacred Wells, while sharing the sacred element of water, represent two distinct expressions of rituality and spirituality in different cultural and religious contexts. This comparison emphasizes the diversity and richness of human spiritual traditions, while underlining the universal role of water as a symbol of purification and rebirth.The following is an updated version of information on water purification rituals in the Basque Country:Baptism: Christian baptism, present in many cultures, symbolizes purification from original sins. 1 There is no specific information on Basque baptismal practices involving the immersion of the child in a river or natural spring. Akelarre: The ancient pre-Christian ritual of “Akelarre”, associated with witches, involved dancing and propitiatory rites around a fire, often near water sources. 23 Water was considered a purifying element to ward off evil spirits and prepare for the ritual. Itturriak: There is no specific information on “Itturriak”, sacred springs dedicated to pre-Christian deities, in the Basque Country. Beltane:The festival of “Beltane”, celebrated on May 1st, marks the beginning of summer and includes water purification rituals. 4 However, there is no information specifically linking this festival to the Basque Country. Sacred Wells: There is no specific information available about sacred wells in the Basque Country. Sacred wells are a notable feature of the Nuragic culture of Sardinia. 5 Furthermore, although there are several Basque legends and folk tales, there is no specific information linking water to purification and healing. The figure of the “laminak”, a mythological female creature associated with water sources, represents the connection between water and the spiritual world in the Basque Country. 67 In conclusion, water plays a prominent role in many cultures and traditions, including the Basque one. However, specific information about water purification rituals in the Basque Country may be limited or not easily accessible. It is advisable to conduct further research or consult with Basque culture experts to obtain more detailed and accurate information. We emphasize the importance of respecting different cultures and religions when studying purification rituals.Jewish literature is Atlantean like the Sumerian one: Moses climbs Mount Sinai in the Sinai Desert, in Sardinia the toponymy Sinnai still exists ; the Atlanteans called Nuragic, that is from the mountains of a plateau of Atlantis, cast bronze statuettes, the Jews cast a golden calf, because the calf is the son of the Bull God ; “God is the light of the world” in John 8:12, and for the Nuragic Atlanteans the Bull God manifests himself from the window of the nuraghe Santa Barbara of Macomer through the light that creates a bull at the base of the Nuraghe in the spring solstice ; the Sardinian block of Corso Atlantide was submerged and the Jews have the story of the Universal Flood ; the daughter of the pharaoh who takes Moses and raises him is called Bithia, and Bithia is the name of another toponym of ancient Sardinia, located in the town of Chia near DOMUS DE MARIA (House of Mary, in Sardinian language), near the beach SU GIUDEU (means the Jew, in Sardinian language), any Sardinian understands what I’m saying… it’s almost funny… Did Modern Jews Originate in Italy? | Science | AAAS
New Scientific Hypothesis: An Unknown Ancient “Monument” Hidden Beneath the Sea of Galilee A team of researchers from Tel Aviv University has discovered a mysterious monument hidden beneath the waves of the Sea of Galilee. The site resembles early burial sites in Europe and was likely built in the Bronze Age.The Discovery Researchers stumbled upon a cone-shaped monument, about 230 feet in diameter, 40 feet tall and weighing about 60,000 tons, while conducting a geophysical survey of the southern Sea of Galilee. Initial findings indicate that the structure was built on dry land about 6,000 years ago and later submerged under water.The Structure The structure is made of volcanic stones called basalt. Since the nearest deposit of this stone is more than a mile away, it is believed that they were brought to the site specifically for this structure. To estimate the age of the structure, researchers turned to the accumulation of sand around its base. Due to the natural accumulation of sand over the years, the base now lies 2 to 3 meters below the bottom of the Sea of Galilee. Significance Dr. Yitzhak Paz of the Antiquities Authority and Ben-Gurion University believes that the site, which was recently detailed in the International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, resembles early burial sites in Europe and was probably built in the Bronze Age. He believes there may be a connection to the nearby ancient city of Beit Yerah, the largest and most fortified city in the area. Next Steps The research team plans to organize underwater excavations to learn more about the origins of the structure, including an investigation of the surface on which the structure was built. This discovery opens up new possibilities for archaeological research and could lead to a better understanding of the ancient history of the region. Conclusion According to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, these structures could be of Atlantean origin.This theory holds that these structures were built by the people who inhabited the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and its paleocoasts before their submergence. This perspective offers a new lens through which to examine and interpret archaeological discoveries in the Sea of Galilee and elsewhere. However, as with all scientific theories, it is important that these ideas are subjected to rigorous scrutiny and verification by the scientific community. Only through this process can we hope to get closer to the truth about the ancient history of the region and its connection to the historical Atlantis, i.e. the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. In conclusion, the discovery of this ancient unknown “monument” beneath the Sea of Galilee opens up new possibilities for archaeological research and could lead to a better understanding of the ancient history of the region.
Atlantean Semitic agglutinative ergative vocalization of the two well-known words SRDN (which many have interpreted as: Sherden, Shardan, Shardana) and SPRD (Hesperides) in their original translation. I am not a linguist, so I do not have the ability to understand the exact mechanisms. However, in their Italian translation, which is absolutely not authentic, because the ancients did not speak the Italian of today, we already have a 75% correspondence, 3 letters out of 4. Now, using my research method, based on insight, on intuition, I can imagine that the Atlantean Semitic agglutinative ergative language spoken in Atlantis was not vocalized, as happens with today’s standard Arabic (however, there are for example some texts of the Koran vocalized to help children or readers who are learning). So it is possible that, upon returning to Greece, the sailors vocalized the 4 Atlantean letters SRDN in a different way, giving rise to the Garden of the Hesperides. Let us suppose that SRDN means ISRI EDEN, that is, the Garden of Eden of the Isri, the people named in the Merenptah Stele, an ancient Egyptian historical epigraphic document about which you can find a lot of information online. It is possible that the name Eden of the Isri was later revoiced in Greece as the Garden of the Hesperides, distorting the initial concept and deforming it, thus making it indecipherable and incomprehensible. I wish good study to the linguists who want to try their hand at this research work.
Nuragic means Atlantean . Calling the Atlantean period Nuragic is like calling American civilization Coca-Cola or calling German society würstelotic . Giovanni Lilliu was great in many ways, but that doesn’t mean he’s infallible: we’ve already seen in previous millennia what happened when people said “Ipse Dixit”, for Aristotle… you should never make the authors’ works absolute, you risk making very serious mistakes. If it was Lilliu who invented the term “Nuragic”, this term has had its day and must be replaced with the term Atlantean . So all Ancient History will finally return to its place, and we will be able to see reality through the eyes of those who truly know and understand. My observation suggests a revision of the term “Nuragic” with “Atlantean” to refer to the Nuragic civilization of Sardinia, and it is important to consider that this proposal could be controversial and require a broader discussion in the academic community. Historicity of the term “Nuragic”: The term “Nuragic” has long been used to describe the prehistoric civilization of Sardinia, characterized by the presence of thousands of Atlantean stone towers called “nuraghi”. This term is widely recognized and accepted by scholars in the field of archaeology and ancient history, so it will be incredibly difficult to make the Scientific Community understand that it has been wrong for at least 2000 years in naming this type of civilization. Historical-cultural context: The term “Atlantean” traditionally refers to the legendary civilization of Atlantis, which is spoken of in Plato’s dialogues and which this website claims to be the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and a historical reality that really existed and is not fictitious. Since Atlantis is the same as the Nuragic civilization, replacing the term “Nuragic” with “Atlantean” would bring order to scientific thought, as the two concepts are identical and belong to perfectly congruent historical contexts, as already explained by the priest Sonchis of Sais to Solon around 590 BC. Academic acceptance: A proposal of this type would require a broad discussion and evaluation by the academic community, involving archaeologists, historians and linguists. Changes to the terms used to describe cultures and civilizations must be supported by solid evidence and a broad academic consensus. Ultimately, it is legitimate and scientifically necessary to explore new interpretations and approaches in historical research, replacing the term “Nuragic” with “Atlantean” would require a rigorous discussion and an in-depth analysis of the linguistic, cultural and historical implications involved caused by Luigi Usai’s discoveries made since 2021 in Quartucciu.
Possibility that the “Sardinian chest with 4 wheels”, a Nuragic Atlantean bronze statuette, is the Ark of the Covenant: verify any possible connections with CHINE – 19th century Fang Ding vase with archaizing Taotie mask decoration Bronze with patina H. 133 cm – W. 11.5 cm – D. 7.5 cm Holes Is it possible that the Fang Ding are an ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migration to China? And that they made their own version of the Ark of the Covenant in bronze, but inserting the Bull God on the front? Verify.
Jewish literature is as Atlantean as Sumerian
Moses climbs Mount Sinai in the Sinai Desert, in Sardinia the toponymy Sinnai still exists; the Atlanteans called nuragics by Giovanni Lilliu as if I called the Americans the CocaColotics and the Germans the Würstelotics, Atlanteans-nuragic or from the mountains of a plateau of Atlantis today called Sardinia, cast the Nuragic-Atlantean bronzes in bronze, the Jews cast a golden calf, because the calf is the son of the Bull God, and in fact “God sent his Son so that the world might be saved through him” John 3,16-18
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life.
“God is the light of the world” in John 8:12, and for the Nuragic Atlanteans the Bull God manifests himself from the window of the Nuraghe Santa Barbara of Macomer through the light that creates a bull at the base of the Nuraghe during the spring solstice;
From the Gospel of John: “Jesus spoke to them again, saying, ‘I am the light of the world; whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life’” (John 8:12)
the continental shelf of the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian block was submerged and the Jews have the story of the Great Flood, exactly like the Sumerians;
the daughter of the pharaoh who takes Moses and raises him is called Bithia, and Bithia is the name of another toponym of ancient Sardinia, located in the town of Chia near DOMUS DE MARIA (House of Mary, in the Sardinian language), near the beach SU GIUDEU (means the Jew, in the Sardinian language), any Sardinian understands what I’m saying… it almost makes you laugh… or maybe cry because until today no one had ever noticed!! The Jews were an ancient migration from the Sardinian-Corsican block because the paleocoasts were about to be submerged (the universal flood is the rise in the eustatic sea level of the Western Mediterranean, anciently called the Atlantic Ocean).
The submerged Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts were inhabited by a civilization that migrated in all directions: the migrations gave rise to the Basques (Vasconi), the Sumerians, the Villanovans, the Hopi Indians, the Mohave, the Uto-Aztecan Nehuatl-speaking peoples and variants, and obviously the Sardinians and Corsicans. The Jews were post-Nuragic.
The Atlantean population lived on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, currently submerged in the ancient Atlantic Ocean, today called the Western Mediterranean.
Among the Atlantean peoples we have: the Sumerians, who following the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paleocoasts moved to live in Mesopotamia, and in fact they were already experts in canalization, they had their own language already developed and mature because it is one of the variants of the Semitic agglutinative ergative Atlantean language spoken in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block before its semi-submersion; they already had the Atlantean laws, from which many years later the Code of Hammurabi derived with the cognitive mixing with the other Mesopotamian cultures. Another Atlantean people are the Vascones, today called the Basque people: in fact the Basque language is an agglutinative ergative Semitic Atlantean language exactly like the Sumerian language. In the Basque Country we note that the post-Atlantean city (i.e. following the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf) of Kalaris in Sardinia, today called Cagliari, has an almost identical toponym in the Basque Country with Calagurris (now Calahorra). So we have Calaris in Sardinia and Calaguris in the Basque Country: to date 8 February 2024 I have not yet discovered the meaning of these two toponyms.
Among the peoples who migrated from Atlantis, also called Meropide, before its partial sinking, we find in America: the Hopi Indians, the Mohave Indians and the Aztecs who in fact created a city similar to Sulcis, that is, similar to the capital of Atlantis in the current south of Sardinia.
Probably the Jewish people are also an Atlantean migration from the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, in fact their land had sunk, submerged, and so they landed with ships in the desert and continually went in search of a “promised land” because theirs had been submerged by water, as told in the saga of Gilgamesh by the Sumerian Atlanteans and by the Jewish Atlanteans in the historical story of Noah, which is therefore not a myth but the memory of events that really happened.
This is why the Usai mummy exists in Bologna: because Usai is an Atlantean surname of populations that come from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged by what has been defined as the “Universal Flood”, in the ancient Atlantic Ocean now called the Western Mediterranean. The Usai mummy is very famous throughout the world but is not valued as a mummy of Atlantean origins. In short, we humans have failed up to now in the attempt to decode the past. This is why the Turin Museum is full of Egyptian Bronzes but their provenance was not understood, and Egypt, since the bronzes are more linked to the Nuragic-Atlantean culture that has survived with vast evidence, has distanced them from Egypt as if they were not part of their culture, but this is a lie.
The “Hand of Irulegi” is an archaeological find of extraordinary importance discovered in 2021. This thin sculpture of a hand, made of bronze, dates back to the beginning of the first century BC. It was found during archaeological excavations at the site of Irulegi, located in the Valle de Aranguren, in Spain. The Hand of Irulegi is notable for its inscription in Atlantean Corsican Sardinian, an Atlantean ergative agglutinative Semitic language spoken in the Corsican Sardinian geological block before its sinking. This inscription represents the oldest written testimony of the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian language that we know of in the territory of Navarre. The discovery could provide new information on the origins of this language, as stated by the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm formulated by the scholar Luigi Usai 1. The hand was made on a sheet of beaten bronze exactly in the Atlantean-Nuragic style as was done with the Nuragic bronzes, stretched, smoothed and cut. Its dimensions are 143.1 mm high, 127.9 mm wide and 1.09 mm thick, and it weighs 35.9 grams. On the back of the hand there is an inscription consisting of four lines and 40 signs. This inscription is of particular importance because it offers a rare vision of the ancient Atlantean Corsican Sardinian language in the Navarrese territory. The Hand of Irulegi has been declared a “Property of Cultural Interest” by the Government of Navarre. This recognition underlines the importance of the find for the understanding of the history and culture of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The Irulegi Hand represents a significant discovery that could change our understanding of the history of the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsican language and its mutations in Basque and Vascon territory, especially in relation to the Sumerian and Hebrew languages, and to the other Uto-Aztecan languages spoken by the American peoples. This find offers a precious testimony of the past and could shed new light on the roots of the culture of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block 1 .
The Atlantean Sardinian-Corsican Paradigm (SCA) offers an innovative perspective on ancient history. According to this paradigm, the Atlantean language, spoken on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, was a Semitic, agglutinative and ergative language, with affinities not only to Sumerian and Basque, but also to other languages such as Hopi, Mohave, Aztec, Nahuatl and Uto-Aztecan languages, as observed by Luigi Usai. The presence of Proto-Sumerian characters on the Fuente Magna, as suggested by some research, is consistent with the SCA theory. This theory in fact predicts that such characters represent the Atlantean language of the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf. This prediction seems to strengthen the validity of the SCA paradigm, since a valid scientific theory that challenges the dominant scientific paradigm must be able to make accurate predictions. The Fuente Magna, an archaeological find that defies current scientific explanations, finds a possible interpretation in the SCA paradigm. According to this theory, the Fuente Magna would have been produced and exported from the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, now submerged in the ancient Atlantic Ocean, as described by Sonchis of Sais and Herodotus in his Histories . This ocean is today identified as the Western Mediterranean, the sea that surrounds Sardinia, Corsica and the Balearics. The SCA paradigm suggests that the Atlantean populations that populated the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf may have migrated in prehistoric times, bringing with them the Fuente Magna, which was then abandoned or lost where it was found. This theory does not resort to fantastic hypotheses such as aliens, spaceships, Martians or teleportation, but explains the finds with objective and realistic facts, even probable ones. In conclusion, the SCA paradigm opens a new and stimulating perspective on ancient history, offering possible explanations to some of the most fascinating mysteries of archaeology . However, like all scientific theories, it needs further research and empirical confirmation to be fully accepted .
If the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm (SCA) were to be confirmed as valid, it would have profound implications for our understanding of the discovery of America. According to this theory, Atlantean migrations from the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf could have had a significant impact on the history of pre-Columbian America, potentially anticipating and influencing the discovery of the continent by Europeans. If Atlantean populations from Sardinia and Corsica migrated across the Atlantic to the Americas in prehistoric times, this would suggest that America was not “discovered” by Christopher Columbus in 1492, but rather that contact between the Old and New Worlds occurred much earlier. These Atlantean migrations could have brought knowledge, technology and cultural influences to the Americas, contributing to the development of pre-Columbian civilizations. This revolutionary scenario would completely rewrite the traditional narrative of the discovery of America and raise important questions about history and human interaction over the millennia. If Atlantean migrations did indeed bring Sardinian-Corsican populations to the Americas, this would have far-reaching implications not only for the history of America, but also for our understanding of the evolution and development of human civilizations in general. However, it is important to emphasize that this theory is still being studied and discussed, and that further research and evidence are needed to definitively confirm it. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm offers an intriguing and thought-provoking perspective on ancient history, but further interdisciplinary investigations are essential to assess its validity and its impact on our understanding of human history.
My new hypothesis suggests an intriguing link between the Herodion in Israel and the ziggurat of Monte d’Accoddi in Sardinia. According to this view, the Herodion would represent an evolution of the construction techniques of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans. After many years, these skilled builders would have perfected their techniques and developed a unique architectural style, different from the original one of Monte d’Accoddi. The Herodion, a truncated cone-shaped hill that rises about 60 meters above the surrounding plain, is an example of this evolution. On its summit, Herod the Great built a palace-fortress between 23 and 15 BC, demonstrating a combination of palace and fortress that was common to several Herodian constructions, such as Masada. This structure, located in the West Bank, 12 km south of Jerusalem, is an impressive example of this architectural evolution. On the other hand, Monte d’Accoddi in Sardinia is a pre-Nuragic archaeological site founded between 4000 and 3650 BC and expanded between 2800 and 2400 BC. This site hosts a type of architecture that is usually associated with ancient Mesopotamia. At Monte d’Accoddi there is a ziggurat, a square-based building rising in a pyramidal shape, which represents the roots of this building tradition. My hypothesis that the Herodion could be an evolution of the ziggurat of Monte d’Accoddi is fascinating. Both structures have unique architectural features and are significant testimonies of their respective civilizations. However, there is no direct evidence linking the two structures or indicating that the Herodion is a direct evolution of the Monte d’Accoddi ziggurat. The similarities may be the result of similar architectural solutions to similar challenges, rather than the result of a direct connection or evolution from one structure to the other. Furthermore, the Monte d’Accoddi ziggurat is much older than the Herodion, making it difficult to establish a direct connection between the two. Despite these differences, both the Herodion and the Monte d’Accoddi ziggurat remain important archaeological sites that offer valuable insights into the civilizations that built them, which I believe are Sardo-Atlantean in one case, and Jewish-Atlantean in the other. My hypothesis adds an additional layer of complexity and interest to these two fascinating structures. It is possible that the short staircase of Monte d’Accoddi was modified for delusions of grandeur, making it gigantic in the Herodion to the point of reaching the top of a hill, a bit like the Tower of Babel was an attempt to reach God, in short, always a vain reason to demonstrate pomp, wealth and superiority.
Tamils occupy a prominent place in the vast panorama of world cultures and languages. Originally from the state of Tamil Nadu in southeastern India and northeastern Sri Lanka, Tamils are a Dravidian ethnic group that speaks a unique language and has a rich and ancient culture. According to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm proposed by Dr. Luigi Usai, the Tamil language could be a direct legacy of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans, a people who lived on the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, known as the Atlanteans. This hypothesis suggests that Tamil is an Atlantean Semitic agglutinative ergative language, a type of language that has unique features in word formation and sentence structure . Another interesting element of Tamil culture is the tradition of bull games, known as Jallikattu . This tradition, which has ancient roots, could be a direct legacy of the Atlantean culture. While in other cultures, such as the Basques, this tradition has evolved over time from the encierro to the bullfight, the Tamils have another name in use, which is not clear at the moment whether it is the original one or modified over the millennia, of Jallikattu, and have retained many of its characteristics that we do not yet know if they are the original ones. Despite the similarities and possible connections, it is important to emphasize that there is no direct evidence to confirm these hypotheses. The similarities could be the result of independent developments or widespread cultural influences rather than a direct evolution from one culture to another. However, these hypotheses add another level of complexity and interest to the history of the Tamils and offer new avenues for further research and discovery. In the meantime, the Tamils remain an important ethnic and linguistic group that offers valuable insights into the civilizations that shaped them. It will now be interesting to study the Dravidian culture as a post-Atlantean culture. The fact that the Tamils are settled along the coasts of various nations suggests that they are a People of the Sea, that is, an Atlantean people.
New scientific hypothesis: the Sea Peoples are the peoples of Atlantean origin. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm foresees that the Sea Peoples cited by the Egyptians are the peoples of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin, that is, peoples who inhabited the Atlantean paleocoasts, that is, the paleocoasts of Merope or Meropide, that is, who inhabited the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf currently semi-submerged under the ancient Atlantic Ocean. When these people realized that the Sardinian-Corsican island was about to be submerged, they had to make a decision: die under the sea or flee. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm therefore hypothesizes that these peoples split in all possible directions or almost: one group left for the West, the descendants of those who would later become the Hopi, Mohave, Nehuatl and Aztec Indians, who in fact maintained traditions that tell the story of Atlantis exactly, that is, coming from an island that was sinking in the Atlantic Ocean (today we call it the Western Mediterranean, which is why we didn’t find it until 2021). One group became the Villanovans, very rich in Atlantean symbolism with concentric circles and fake doors, which then passed to the Etruscan culture. One group became the Jews, another the Sumerians with cuneiform writing. One group became the Vascones (the Vascones for the Romans) today become the Basques, who in fact have linguistic and toponymic commonalities with other peoples, such as the Sardinians. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean theory also foresees that an ethnic group has become the Dravidian-Tamil population, which in fact presents at least two Atlantean characteristics: the Jallikattu, or the tradition of games with bulls, also called tauromachies, and the Semitic agglutinative-ergative Atlantean language. At this point, given all these apparent coincidences and characteristics, it is instinctive to think the following things: if the entire Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm is true, another scientific hypothesis can be made on the Minoans.
Scientific hypothesis: the Minoans are Sea Peoples, that is, Atlanteans, and therefore should present two characteristics: one, bullfighting and the second, an agglutinative ergative Semitic language . Now, Minoan bullfighting is very well known throughout the world: the palace of Knossos is in fact full of references to bulls and bullfighting, games of inhabitants with dolphins (they are in fact Atlanteans or people of the sea) and with bulls (in Sardinian-Corsica Atlantis the Bull God was worshipped and his son, the calf-bull of light that entered from the window of the nuraghi, who was then anthropomorphized into the human Son of God, that is, Jesus Christ). If Minoan linguistic writings have been found, therefore, it will be possible to feed them to an artificial intelligence that has had massive training with all the agglutinative ergative Semitic languages available.
Scientific hypothesis: I am pleased to present a novel theory regarding the complex system of glyphs known as Rongorongo . This enigmatic writing system, discovered on Easter Island in the 19th century, has resisted numerous attempts at decipherment for more than a century. However, I propose an intriguing new hypothesis: Rongorongo could be a linguistic manifestation of the Atlantean Sea People who settled in this region. Rongorongo glyphs have been identified mainly on wooden tablets, but also on statues and ornaments, such as the Rei Miro. These artifacts, discovered in the 19th century and sometimes damaged, are now kept in various museums and private collections around the world, testifying to the cultural richness of Easter Island. My theory is based on the suggestion that the Atlantean Sea People, known for their veneration of the bull and the practice of bullfighting, could have brought their language and culture with them during their migration to Easter Island. It is hypothesized that this language, of Atlantean Semitic nature and characterized by ergative agglutination, may have formed the basis of the Rongorongo writing system. If this hypothesis were confirmed, it could shed new light on the peculiarities of Rongorongo, such as its reversed boustrophedon writing scheme, in which the direction of writing alternates between right and left on each line. In addition, many of the glyphs depict human, animal and plant forms, as well as abstract geometric shapes, which could reflect the cultural influences of the Atlantean sea people. It is essential to emphasize that this is only a theory and requires further investigation to be validated. However, I hope that it can open new perspectives of study on the mystery of Rongorongo and its origins. If my hypothesis were to prove accurate, it could shed new light not only on the history of Easter Island, but also on the history of humanity as a whole, revealing new connections between ancient cultures and civilizations.
Counter-verification according to the scientific method: if the Mohave and Hopi Indians are of Atlantean origin, they must present the two fundamental Atlantean characteristics of the sea peoples coming from the Sardinian-Corsica Atlantean island: they must worship the bull and must have an Atlantean Semitic agglutinative ergative language. The Indians venerate and seek and follow the “Tatanka”, that is, the bison, animals of great importance in their culture and society; it seems in fact that the worship of the bull has changed into the worship of the bison. The language of these two groups of Indians is Uto-Aztecan, therefore it is ergative agglutinative. It therefore seems that the Atlantean linguistic theory of Luigi Usai, the writer, is correct and explains a great deal of data, a great deal of uses and customs: the Indians worshipped the bison because they were originally of Atlantean religion! A true scientific theory must in fact be capable of explaining facts, events, and it seems that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm is true and correct, since for the moment it never contradicts itself.
In this dissertation, I propose to present an innovative thesis concerning the so-called “Sea Peoples”, a conglomerate of maritime populations that marked the history of the Bronze Age with their incursions. This thesis, which is based on an interdisciplinary analysis involving geology, archaeology, linguistics and many other disciplines, postulates that the Sea Peoples are actually the original inhabitants of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, forced to migrate due to the semi-submersion of their territory . The semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican block is a documented geological phenomenon and well known to geology, caused by a combination of factors including the rise in sea level after the last glaciation and perhaps, according to the hypothesis of the undersigned Dr. Luigi Usai, seismic activity along a Wadati-Benioff fault underlying the Sulcis (Luigi Usai, 2021). This event would have caused a mass migration of the resident populations, who would have dispersed in many directions and areas of the Mediterranean and the present Atlantic Ocean. The trace of this migration is found, according to our hypothesis, in the cultures, languages, architecture of the regions where these peoples settled. This connection, if confirmed, could shed new light on the question of the Sea Peoples and their origin, providing a link with the ancient civilization of Atlantis, as in the story of Sonchis of Sais to Solon in Plato’s Timaeus and Critias . However, as with any scientific theory, this hypothesis requires further research and confirmation by the scientific community. Science, as Karl Popper (The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1934) pointed out, is a continuous process of hypothesis formulation, empirical verification and critical revision. Therefore, I will continue to explore this fascinating question, looking for new evidence and connections that can enrich our understanding of the past.
Phaistos Disk Hypothesis : An anomalous archaeological document like the Fuente Magna has been found, called the Phaistos Disk. The Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm (SCA paradigm) offers a convincing explanation for the writing on the Phaistos Disk and the presence of a figure resembling an American Indian . Atlantean writing, as demonstrated by the SCA paradigm, is Semitic, agglutinative, and ergative. This could explain the possible writing on the Phaistos Disk, an archaeological puzzle that has challenged scholars for centuries. Furthermore, Atlantean migrations are believed to have arrived in America before Christopher Columbus, becoming the ancestors of various Indian ethnic groups such as the Hopi and the Mohave, as well as the Aztecs and Nahuatl. This could explain the presence of a figure resembling an American Indian: it was a character of one of the peoples who later migrated to the Americas, who maintained that type of hairdo, although it is currently unclear which one (Cheyenne?). These connections between different cultures and languages demonstrate the interconnectedness of human history and its influence on our understanding of the past but require further research to arrive at a final solution to this intriguing historical enigma.
Atlantean Origin of the Jews:The most accepted theories on the origin of the Jews are based on historical, archaeological and biblical sources. Here is a summary of the most relevant information:
Historical Origins : From a historical point of view, the biblical account has not been considered reliable, especially with regard to the most ancient phases of Jewish history. The first historical sources that speak of the people of Israel date back to around 1200 BC, which is the approximate date in which the Sea Peoples, or the Atlanteans, as demonstrated on this website, tried to land in Egypt and were repelled, as shown by the historical-archaeological evidence of the hieroglyphic inscriptions at Medinet Habu. Jewish culture developed in the area of present-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, in a society of semi-nomadic shepherds, who spoke a Semitic language and lived divided into clans and tribes 1 . And we have shown in other parts of this text that the Atlantean language was Semitic, agglutinative and ergative . In practice, rejected by the Pharaoh, they settled in the adjacent free zones, where they could disembark to look for a land, and these people are precisely Atlanteans and Nuragic people, who have all the uses and customs of the Sardinian-Corsican block, including the Nuragic religion of the bull-calf of light, son of the God Bull.
Kingdom of Israel and Judah : Around 900 BC, some Jewish tribes had established a kingdom, called the kingdom of Israel, with its capital in Samaria. We have said that the Atlantean migration of the Sumerians used the Semitic agglutinative ergative Atlantean language called Sumerian. The word Sumer, not vocalized as it is in Semitic, is SMR; and the Jews call the capital Samaria, which is not vocalized is SMR. These alone could be coincidences, but a great many coincidences are starting to look quite unlikely. It is more likely that it all makes logical sense. In the 8th century BC, the Assyrians destroyed the city and deported its inhabitants to Mesopotamia. Later, the kingdom of Judah emerged, further south, with its capital in Jerusalem, where the most important temple dedicated to Yahweh stood 1 .
Remember that these are theories based on historical and archaeological sources, and there may be different interpretations and debates among scholars on these topics: however this website shows a historical, archaeological, scientific, linguistic, anthropological paradigm shift that should be seriously taken into consideration.
Scientific working hypothesis: mummification is an art of Atlantean origin, taught to ancient Egypt when they were their rulers, and then remained after the semi-submersion of the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian geological block . The Atlantean colonies that went to America before it was discovered, or who perhaps already knew it in prehistoric times and we potentially ignore this fact, brought the mummification techniques to America and passed on these uses and customs to their descendants, who used it, perplexing scholars, who saw an Egyptian practice on the opposite side of the world. However, we have already seen that the migrations of the Atlantean sea peoples also brought the Atlantean Semitic agglutinative ergative languages such as Uto-Aztecan and Nehuatl. As of today, February 15, 2024, I am not an expert on mummification, so I cannot add any more details to my analysis, but many scholars, starting from this intriguing hypothesis of mine, could obtain a lot of other information. For example, the Guanches could be a group of people who decided to become sedentary and created that civilization after the migrations that started from the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian block. This is why there are Atlantean Domus de Janas in Tenerife, symbols based on spirals and concentric circles of Atlantean nature, and people mummified according to the hypothetical Atlantean rite, still to be scientifically proven.
In Sardinian Campidanese the rainbow is called “Cirikku ‘e Nuéi”, which means “Noah’s Circle”. There is therefore a very strong super-congruence in the theories affirmed by the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, which seems to converge infinitely towards a confirmation that the entire theoretical system is based on real information, on facts, and not on abstractions. Even the sayings, proverbs, traditions, Sardinian-Corsican mythology, seem to converge towards a confirmation that the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm is correct.
Stones : Sonchis of Sais claimed that Atlantis was built with white, black and red stones. The altar of S’Arcu ‘e is Forros, with its ashlars of black basalt and red sandstone, features a similar combination of colors.
Levites and the Temple : In the Bible, the Levites preside over the temple and take care of its activities. Their colors are white, black and red, the same colors used in building in Atlantis.
In Greek mythology, the Amazons were a race of female warriors renowned for their equestrian skills, courage, and pride. They lived at the farthest reaches of the known world, in a city on the shores of the Black Sea , sometimes referred to as Themiskyra . The Amazons fought and lost three famous battles against the Greek heroes Hercules , Theseus , and Bellerophon . These battle scenes were often depicted in Greek art, such as pottery and monumental sculpture. Recent archaeological discoveries in tombs across Eurasia, especially around the Black Sea, have revealed that nomadic women from steppe tribes were warriors. This connection may suggest that the legends about the Amazons may have been based on real female warriors. Herodotus, in his Histories , describes the encounter between the Amazons and the Scythians, and this union is believed to have given rise to the new people of the Sarmatians in southern Russia, known for their horses and military raids. Luigi Usai, instead, has shown that perhaps the Atlantean Amazons who arrived in the Black Sea were the same people who made the Dolmens present in the city of Gelendgik, in Russia. We know that the Atlantean people dug into the rock and created tunnels and galleries. The Dolmens probably made by the Amazon migration in the Black Sea, which ancient historians speak of, created enormous holes in the structures, which perhaps have a symbolic value, still undeciphered for us. A fragment of a bronze hydria was recovered in Sardinia. This type of hydria, until now unknown on the island, is a sumptuary production of the highest quality, Greek or more probably Magna Graecia, from the last decades of the 6th century BC. The fragment consists of a hand with a hole through the palm, functional for fixing to the container. The back is shaped to adhere to the profile of the vase and does not have particular finishes. The exact location of the workshops that produced these hydria still remains a mystery 1 . This hydria has a hole in the hands, which is currently considered functional for hanging or hooking: in this text it is proposed instead that there may be a hidden connection with the hole made by the Amazons of the Black Sea in their dolmens. The Hole can therefore rise to a symbolic value with a semantics that for now is still unknown to scholars.
Scientific hypothesis: Naupa Huaca is Atlantean post-migration from the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paleocoasts. Develop the hypothesis by adducing evidence on the Atlantean architecture, which recalls Yonaguny, and the presence of a quarry, which recalls the mines of Sulcis of the Sardinian-Corsican block.
The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm also manages to explain the symbolism and the existence of the archaeological finds called Mustatil in Saudi Arabia . They would have been made by Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean migrations, perhaps after the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The symbolism was that which then passed to represent the first symbol of the goddess Tanith, that is, the circle and the triangle divided by a line that demarcates the separation, of the Straits of Bonifacio.
Evolution of the surname USAI in Turkey and Arabic-speaking countries – al-Husayn ibn Ali
The Atlantean surname Husai , evolved into Usai in Sardinia through the loss of the silent H, became Al Husayn in Arabic-speaking countries (see for example Al-Husayn ibn Ali) while in Turkey it evolved into Huseyn because the pronunciations have different spellings; the “ spelled” of the surname, over the millennia, has caused the distortion of the original surname, as demonstrated by the presence of the Usai Mummy in Egypt and by the stele of Sa Meri, which Egyptologists call Sameri because they think it is a word that is all stuck together, as they do not know the Sardinian language and do not understand that in Sardinian Sa Meri means “The Mistress, The owner, She who decides everything, anything”. In fact, today the Sardinian language is snubbed all over the world or almost, it is not studied, indeed, Sardinian parents for hundreds of years have told their children not to speak Sardinian because it is an inferior language, as if it were a pig’s language or dirty. Inconceivable: according to what criteria do we study ancient Greek and modern Greek, ancient Latin, Aramaic, but we do not study the Sardinian language, still in use? What does the Scientific Community of the whole world answer to this question of mine?
The possible origin of the Latin term Ara from Arula in Sardinian. In Sardinia until a few years ago there were Is Pinnettas , traditional houses, present until about 50 years ago in Ozieri. In Fonni the pig shelter is called ARULA singular ARULAS plural, they are low and semi-buried and covered with branches. Now, let’s do a short online search for the term Arula. Arula (small altar) 6th century BC | Terracotta Archaeological Museum of Metauros Exhibited in the Permanent Collection Description Metauros has always had a strong commercial connotation, made up of close contacts and exchanges. Between the end of the 6th and the beginning of the 5th century BC it began to establish stronger relationships with Rhegion and Locri, on the Ionian. The Locrian influences are especially evident in the clay arule (altars) with scenes of zoomachia (animal fights) and sphinxes that were probably used for rituals in honor of the deceased, at the same time signaling the presence of the tomb. This point serves to preserve a possible reading trace between onomastics and toponymy; the reading key may be wrong, but it is interesting to develop this type of conceptual trail.
Follow the trail of the Sardinian toponym LUAS, which ends in the Far East becoming the name of an ancient ruler. In Sardinia we find: Camp’è Luas in Uta; The Nuraghe Luas is a Nuraghe located in an area called Sarcidano about 5 km as the crow flies from Nurri; The nuraghe Luas of Mogorella; The nuraghe Luas 20 km from Maracalagonis; GENN’ANTINE – LUAS which I have not yet verified whether it is relevant or out of place; various locations called Cala Luas throughout Sardinia; the Stele of Zakkur mentions a ruler called “ Luas ”. The stele is an inscription of King Zakkur of Hamath and Luaš (or Luas) . The inscription reads: «I am the stele of Zakkur, king of Hamath and Luaš…» . This stele provides precious historical testimony of the ancient Middle East. In my opinion it is possible that the term Luas is very ancient, and remained in various places controlled by the Atlantean people, including many areas of Sardinia, while in ancient times there was still an ancient ruler of Atlantean origins also called Luas. I do not understand why the ancient Atlantean terms are always accompanied by a second name: perhaps it was to allow the people to pronounce it better, as the Chinese do when they arrive in Italy: since the Italians distort their name, then when a Chinese person arrives in Italy they also choose an Italian name, with which to be called, but it is not the real name, which remains “secret”.
The Kurdish language is: Semitic, ergative and agglutinative, like the Atlantean language spoken in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged. Are the Kurdish people of Atlantean origin? That is why they are persecuted, because they have been a people with different customs and habits from the local ones for thousands of years, so this people of Atlantean origin disturbs, annoys, exactly as happened in Egypt to the Nuragic Atlantean migrations that settled in the desert, as evidenced by the Stele of Merenptah on the YSRI, which then became ISRAEL. So the Jews of Atlantean-Nuragic origin were enslaved by Egypt, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, and then the Roman Empire, which was terrified of the Atlanteans, in 70 AD even decided to make a diaspora of them, to definitively wipe out their culture and their ideas: but by doing so they obtained the exact opposite, because the Jewish-Nuragic culture spread throughout the world, paradoxically they obtained the opposite result. And the Atlantean Kurdish people remained isolated in turn, as the Basque people were isolated: since these Atlantean people are disturbing, they are persecuted throughout the world. The breathtaking and incredible thing is the fact that Hitler was looking for Atlantis, without knowing that the Jews were the Atlanteans. Incredible, crazy.
Is the Egyptian deity Ptah the Platonic Demiurge? Ptah is the god linked to creation. It means: the sculptor, the one who forges. Is it possible that in addition to the story of Atlantis, Plato is doing nothing more than re-proposing the myth of Ptah in a Greek key? Investigate this topic. In fact, it is possible that Plato was trying to bring the ancient Egyptian culture and wisdom to Greece, due to the fact that they kept the events in memory because the Nile saved the people from catastrophes, as explained by Sonchis of Sais to Solon in Timaeus and Critias. It is therefore necessary to revisit the myth of the Demiurge by comparing it with the Egyptian myth of the Creator God Ptah.
Holy Mass as a post-Nuragic rite: suddenly, as if awakened, I realized a connection between the Nuragic religion and Christianity. The Nuragic religion, dating back to the Bronze Age in Sardinia, was probably polytheistic and naturalistic. It is possible that they worshipped the Great Mother Goddess, goddess of fertility and motherhood, and the Bull God sacred to Poseidon, as well as probably the figure of Poseidon, God of the Sea. In some cases, the Nuragic religion provided for the Bull God to send his son, the calf or bull of light, through the window of the nuraghe . These religious concepts seem to have been taken up by Jesus Christ in the New Testament. Jesus offered himself as a sacrifice for humanity, a concept that could be compared to the calf offered as a sacrifice in the Nuragic religion. Christianity is a religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ as described in the New Testament of the Bible. Jesus is recognized as the Son of God and the Savior of humanity. His words, “ I am the light of the world ; he who follows me will never walk in darkness” ( John 8:12 ), are interpreted as a promise of guidance and salvation for those who follow his teachings. Furthermore, we can make a consideration in reverse: Jesus says, “Take this, all of you, and eat it; this is my body, which will be given up for you.” He offers his body to be eaten. This sentence makes no sense at all. It would make sense if Jesus and his disciples were cannibals, but this sentence in a normal context makes no sense: if you told your friends to take your body and eat it, they would immediately think either that you were joking in bad taste, or that you had gone mad. Why then does Jesus tell his disciples to eat his body, which was given up for them? Probably the ritual of the Nuragic religion required that veal be eaten on the day of the appearance of the calf of light at the base of the nuraghe, from the window placed high up and built and created specifically to obtain this light effect, which we will then also find in Egypt, probably brought by the migrant Nuragic-Jewish population and taught to the Egyptians, who probably tried to improve or personalize the visual-sacral-religious effect. Since veal was eaten (hypothesis), it is probable that this custom was maintained over the centuries: not knowing the Jewish uses and customs, I cannot express myself in this sense.Jesus probably did nothing more than re-propose the ritual of eating the son of God, that is, the veal, the calf of light that entered through the window of the Nuraghe, and proposed to eat his meat, because this time it is he that the Father sent into the world, and therefore Jesus is the alter ego of the calf of light son of the Father, the Bull God, and the bull was sacred to Poseidon, God of Atlantis. Furthermore, Jesus does not say that “he is the calf of light son of the Bull God”, but states that he is the sacrificial lamb . This can make us think that probably in the desert it was very difficult to get veal for all the people, there being too many of them, so perhaps veal was replaced over the centuries by lamb, easier to find for this migrant people in search of a Promised Land that would replace the submerged one of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paleocoasts. The cult of the Mother Goddess, which has its historical and archaeological roots in ancient Sardinia and reaches up to the Nuragic period that we are now facing, will be gradually transformed into what will become the Cult of the Virgin, Cult of the Madonna in its thousand forms and variations. We are witnessing now, in real time, the reconversion from Nuragic religion to Christian-Catholic religion. I hope that believers will not feel offended by these statements of mine, but this is Science: the attempt to understand reality and to interpret it in a clear, logical and transparent way. At this moment, this text is performing the function of biblical exegesis, of hermeneutic text of Christian symbolism. We could develop these concepts much more deeply, but at this moment I believe that this first step is so important and decisive that it deserves to be analyzed, studied, understood and understood calmly, without adding new information to this that already distorts the Christian religion. We want to emphasize at this moment the deep respect for all religious beliefs and conceptions: even if all this were true, religious people, believers deserve a very deep respect for the values in which they believe, no matter if they are true, false, well-founded or unfounded. Every citizen is free to believe in the religious aspects that make him happy: the fact that I know these things and have discovered them myself, does not prohibit me from going to mass or believing in religion. Indeed, it is possible that from today these beliefs take on a much more significant and profound value than before, precisely because they are understood in their deep psychological, anthropological and social root. This reflection offers an intriguing perspective on the possible interaction and influence between different religious traditions. These are my personal interpretations and there is no direct evidence linking the Nuragic religion to Christianity, so if they were to be correct it would show a sort of strange ability of mine to read the sources in a totally innovative and creative way but close to the original. This type of reading of historical, archaeological, geological sources and so on does not please the academic world, because it seems very much like something unscientific.
Oxhide ingots: or perhaps it would be better to say calfskin ingots?
Oxhide ingots, so called because of their shape that resembles the hide of an ox stretched out in the sun, represent a fascinating mystery in the vast panorama of archaeology. Discovered in various regions of the Mediterranean , these artefacts bear witness to the ancient trade network that united peoples and cultures. They are mainly associated with the Nuragic civilisation of Sardinia, dating back to the Bronze Age (1800-500 BC). These ingots, often made of copper or bronze, were a valuable trade good, used not only for trade but also as votive offerings in sacred contexts. Despite their diffusion, many questions remain unanswered. Where did the metal used to produce them come from? What was their actual value? How were they transported? Archaeological research continues to search for answers to these questions, revealing piece by piece the mystery of the oxhide ingots. Each new discovery adds a piece to the puzzle, helping to paint an increasingly complete picture of the ancient civilisations of the Mediterranean. Oxhide ingots are an archaeological treasure, a window into the past that allows us to better understand the economic and social dynamics of ancient civilizations. Oxhide ingots, symbols of the Nuragic civilization, take on an even deeper meaning in light of recent discoveries . Luigi Usai has in fact shown how, for the Nuragic populations, the calf had the value of the Son of God . This veneration was manifested in particular in the ritual of the bull-calf of light that entered through the window of the nuraghe, a moment of profound spirituality and communion with the divine. This figure of the calf, venerated as the Son of God, can be seen as a precursor of Christ the sacrificial lamb, a fascinating link between ancient Nuragic beliefs and Christian traditions. Oxhide ingots, therefore, were not only a means of commercial exchange, but also represented a central element in the spirituality and religiosity of these populations. Each new discovery allows us to better understand these dynamics, revealing more and more the mystery of the oxhide ingots and the civilization that produced them. An archaeological treasure that continues to illuminate the past, offering us a new perspective on the history of ancient Mediterranean civilizations. Development of the theme of the Nuragic Calf of Light in biblical texts. How many times does the term Calf appear in the Bible? In which contexts is it cited? Is it possible to reconstruct a possible passage from the Nuragic Calf of Light to the Catholic Christian sacrificial lamb?
Exodus 32: The Worship of the Golden Calf by the Nuragic-Proto-Hebrew People
Exodus 32 tells the story of the golden calf, an episode that marked a crucial moment in the history of the Jewish people. According to the interpretation provided by Luigi Usai, we can reread this episode in the light of Nuragic traditions. In the Nuragic civilization, the calf was venerated as the Son of God, a symbol of divinity and sacredness, and had a special day in which the calf Son of God appeared in the form of a calf of light, from a window of the nuraghe. This element can be paralleled by the golden calf in Exodus, which the proto-Jewish Nuragic people created and worshiped as an idol during Moses’ absence on Mount Sinai. Why did they create it? Because the people were Nuragic, so they had the cult of the Bull and the Calf his son. So they were simply continuing to believe in the things they already believed in before, that is, the Nuragic religion, of which very little is known, almost nothing, to my current knowledge.
However, Moses’ reaction to the worship of the golden calf, according to the biblical narrative, was one of anger and punishment. We know very well that Moses was a murderer, and in this circumstance we also see Moses in a fit of anger. But we know very well that the people of Atlantis, and therefore also the Nuragic people, were a warrior people: we know this directly also from the discovery of statues of warriors, boxers-boxers, archers, warriors equipped with knives, which we have both with the statuary of Mont’e Prama, and from all the bronzes of the Nuragic bronzes. I have not yet studied and analyzed the bronzes with which the Usai Mummy is equipped, but I will soon be able to add this precious information to this text. This could be interpreted as a rejection of the veneration of animal figures, a clear detachment from the Nuragic religious practices.
On the other hand, the writer Luigi Usai suggests a connection between the Nuragic calf and the sacrificial lamb Christ of Christianity. In this sense, the golden calf could be seen as a precursor of Christ, a symbol of sacrifice and redemption.
In conclusion, the Nuragic-Jewish interpretation proposed by Luigi Usai offers a new perspective on the interpretation of Exodus 32, enriching our understanding of the connections between ancient Mediterranean civilizations and biblical traditions.
33 of 33 results for the term veal
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Genesis 18, 7 7 Abraham himself ran to the herd and took a tender, good calf and gave it to the servant, who quickly prepared it.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Genesis 18, 8 8 He took curds and milk, along with the calf he had prepared, and set it before them. While he was standing with them under the tree, they ate.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Exodus 32, 4 4 He received them from their hand, melted them in a mold, and fashioned them into a molten calf . Then they said, “These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!”
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Exodus 32, 5 5 When Aaron saw this, he built an altar before the calf and proclaimed, “Tomorrow there will be a festival to the Lord.”
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Exodus 32, 8 8 They have quickly turned aside from the way I commanded them. They have made a molten calf for themselves, and have bowed down to it and sacrificed to it, saying, ‘These are your Gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt.’”
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Exodus 32, 19 19 When he approached the camp, he saw the calf and the dancing. Then Moses’ anger burned, and he threw the tablets out of his hands and broke them at the foot of the mountain.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Exodus 32, 20 20 Then he took the calf they had made and burned it in the fire, ground it to powder, scattered it on the water, and made the Israelites drink it.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Exodus 32, 24 24 Then I said, ‘Who has gold? Take it away!’ They gave it to me, and I threw it into the fire, and out came this calf .’
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Exodus 32, 35 35 The LORD struck the people because they had made the calf which Aaron had made.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Leviticus 9, 2 2 and said to Aaron, “Take for yourself a calf for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering, both of them without blemish, and present them before the LORD.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Leviticus 9, 3 3 And you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘Take a male goat for a sin offering, and a calf and a male lamb, both a year old, without blemish, for a burnt offering,
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Leviticus 9, 8 8 Then Aaron came near to the altar and slaughtered the calf of the sin offering.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Leviticus 22, 27 27 “When a calf or a lamb or a goat is born, it shall be with its mother seven days; and from the eighth day and afterward it shall be accepted as an offering made by fire to the LORD.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Deuteronomy 9, 16 16 I looked, and behold, you had sinned against the LORD your God; you had made for yourselves a molten calf ; you had quickly turned aside from the way which the LORD had commanded you.
TEXT
Old Testament > Pentateuch > Deuteronomy 9, 21 21 Then I took your sin offering, the calf you had made, and burned it in the fire. I crushed it and ground it to powder, and I threw the powder into the stream that comes down from the mountain.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Samuel 28, 24 24 Now the woman had a fattened calf in the house ; and she hastened to kill it, and took flour, kneaded it, and baked unleavened bread for it.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > Nehemiah 9, 18 18 Even when they made for themselves a molten calf and said, ‘This is your god who brought you up out of Egypt!’ and they uttered great insults,
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > Tobit 1, 5 5 All my brothers and the tribe of my ancestor Naphtali sacrificed on all the mountains of Galilee to the calf that Jeroboam king of Israel had made in Dan.
TEXT
Old Testament > Wisdom Books > Psalms 29, 6 6 He makes Lebanon leap like a calf , and Mount Sirion like a young wild ox.
TEXT
Old Testament > Wisdom Books > Psalms 106, 19 19 They made a calf at Horeb and worshiped a metal image;
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Isaiah 11, 6 6 The wolf will live with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the kid, and the calf and the lion will feed together, and a little child will lead them.
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Isaiah 27, 10 10 The fortress has become desolate, a place depopulated and abandoned like a wilderness; the calf grazes there , it lies down there and browses on its shrubs.
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Jeremiah 34, 18 18 As for the men who have transgressed my covenant by not carrying out the terms of the covenant that were made before me, I will make them like the calf that was cut in two and passed between its pieces.
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Jeremiah 34, 19 19 The princes of Judah, the princes of Jerusalem, the officials, the priests, and all the people of the land, who passed between the two halves of the calf ,
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Ezekiel 1, 7 7 Their legs were straight, and their feet were like the hooves of a calf , and they shone like burnished bronze.
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Hosea 8, 5 5 I have rejected your calf , O Samaria! My wrath is kindled against them; how long will it be before they are cleansed?
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Hosea 8, 6 6 The calf of Samaria comes from Israel , it is the work of a craftsman, it is not a god: it will be broken to pieces.
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Hosea 10, 5 5 The inhabitants of Samaria tremble for the calf of Beth-aven; her people mourn, and her priests lament for her, because her glory is departing.
TEXT
New Testament > Gospels > Luke 15, 23 23 Bring the fattened calf and kill it, and let us eat and celebrate,
TEXT
New Testament > Gospels > Luke 15, 27 27 He answered him, ‘Your brother is here, and your father has killed the fattened calf because he has received him back safe and sound.’
TEXT
New Testament > Gospels > Luke 15, 30 30 But when this son of yours came, who has devoured your property with prostitutes, you killed the fattened calf for him .’
TEXT
New Testament > Acts of the Apostles > Acts of the Apostles 7, 41 41 And in those days they made a calf , and offered sacrifice unto the idol, and rejoiced in the work of their hands.
TEXT
New Testament > Apocalyptic > Revelation 4, 7 7 The first living creature was like a lion; the second living creature was like a calf ; the third living creature had a appearance like a man; and the fourth living creature was like a flying eagle.
24 of 24 results for the term calves
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Samuel 6, 7 7 Now make a new cart, then take two milk cows that have never been yoked, and hitch the cows to the cart, taking their calves away and bringing them back to the stable.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Samuel 6, 10 10 The men did so. They took two milk cows, harnessed them to the cart, and locked their calves in the stable .
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Samuel 14, 32 32 The people fell upon the spoil and took sheep, oxen and calves and slaughtered them on the ground and ate them with the blood.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Kings 1, 9 9 One day Adonijah sacrificed sheep, oxen, and fattened calves at the stone of Zocheleth, which is near the spring of Rogel. He invited all his brothers, the king’s sons, and all the men of Judah who served the king.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Kings 1, 19 19 He has sacrificed many bullocks, fattened calves , and sheep, and has invited all the king’s sons, Abiathar the priest, and Joab the commander of the army; but he has not invited your servant Solomon.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Kings 1, 25 25 For today he has gone and sacrificed many bulls, fattened calves , and sheep, and has invited all the king’s sons, the commanders of the army, and Abiathar the priest. They are eating and drinking with him and are shouting, ‘Long live King Adonijah!’
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Kings 12, 28 28 After taking counsel, the king made two golden calves and said to the people, “You have often gone up to Jerusalem! Behold, Israel, your gods who brought you up out of the land of Egypt.”
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 1 Kings 12, 32 32 Jeroboam instituted a festival in the eighth month, on the fifteenth day of the month, like the festival that was in Judah. He himself went up to the altar, as he did in Bethel, to sacrifice to the calves which he had made. And in Bethel he appointed priests for the temples which he had made in the high places.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 2 Kings 10, 29 29 But Jehu did not turn away from the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, which he had caused Israel to commit; he did not abandon the golden calves that were in Bethel and Dan.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 2 Kings 17, 16 16 They forsook all the commandments of the LORD their God; they made for themselves two molten calves , and an Asherah pole, and bowed down to all the host of heaven, and served Baal.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 2 Chronicles 11, 15 15 Jeroboam had appointed his priests for the high places, for the satyrs, and for the calves which he had made.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > 2 Chronicles 13, 8 8 Now you think to assert yourselves in the kingdom of the LORD, which is in the hand of the sons of David, because you are a great multitude, and with you are the golden calves , which Jeroboam made for you as gods.
TEXT
Old Testament > Historical Books > Tobit 8, 19 19 Raguel ordered his wife to make plenty of bread; he went and took two calves and four rams from the herd, had them slaughtered and they began to prepare the banquet.
TEXT
Old Testament > Wisdom Books > Psalms 50, 9 9 I will take no calves from your house nor goats from your sheepfolds.
TEXT
Old Testament > Wisdom Books > Sirach 38, 25 25 How can he become wise who handles a plow and boasts of wielding a goad, who drives oxen and is occupied with their work, but talks only about calves ?
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Isaiah 1, 11 11 “Why do you offer me countless sacrifices? ” says the Lord. “ I have had enough of burnt offerings of rams and the fat of fat calves . I do not desire the blood of bulls and lambs and goats .
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Jeremiah 46, 21 21 Her hired servants in the midst of her are like fattened calves ; for they also have turned back, they have fled together, they have not stood, for the day of calamity has come upon them, the time of their punishment.
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Hosea 13, 2 2 Yet they continue to sin and have made for themselves molten images of their silver, idols of their own invention, all of them the work of craftsmen. They say, ‘Offer sacrifices to them,’ and they kiss the calves .
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Amos 6, 4 4 Lying on beds of ivory and stretched out on their couches they eat the lambs from the flock and the calves raised in the stable.
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Micah 6, 6 6 “With what shall I come before the LORD? Shall I bow down before the Most High God? Shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves a year old?
TEXT
Old Testament > Prophetic Books > Malachi 3, 20 20 For you who fear my name, the Sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its wings, and you will go out leaping like calves from the stall.
TEXT
New Testament > Other Letters > Hebrews 9, 12 12 He did not enter by the blood of goats and calves , but by his own blood , once for all into the holy place , thus obtaining eternal redemption.
TEXT
New Testament > Other Letters > Hebrews 9, 13 13 For if the blood of goats and calves, and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling those who are defiled, sanctifies to the cleansing of the flesh,
TEXT
New Testament > Other Letters > Hebrews 9, 19 19 For when Moses had spoken every commandment to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and goats, with water and scarlet wool and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book itself and all the people,
What happens if you ask an Artificial Intelligence to do checks on these topics? The result is the following text.
Your reflection on the connection between the Nuragic religion and Christianity is very interesting. Here is some information I found:
Please note that this is just information I have found and may not fully or accurately cover your thoughts. Your hypothesis is fascinating and could be an interesting research topic for scholars of religion and history.
The Nuragic religion, dating back to the Bronze Age in Sardinia, has several points of contact with Christianity. Here are some examples:
Conversion to Christianity : With the advent of Christianity, churches were built in the immediate vicinity of the Nuragic sanctuaries. This may have been done to facilitate the transition from the pagan rite to the religious one of the church 3 . We have also seen the thousand-year-old attempt of the Catholic Church to transform the ancient cult of Poseidon into something evil, with the conversion of Poseidon into Satan. The figure of Poseidon was therefore negatively Christianized, making him the symbol of Satan and the Devil personified.
Symbolism : As I have already mentioned, the figure of the calf of light in the Nuragic religion can be seen as a precursor of the sacrificial lamb Christ in Christianity .
These are just a few examples of the possible connections between the Nuragic religion and Christianity. Research continues to discover further connections and better understand how these ancient traditions may have influenced the religious beliefs and practices we know today.
Atlantean Origin Hypothesis of the Phoenicians : The Phoenicians were actually Atlanteans who had migrated from the Sardinian-Corsican block due to the impending submersion of some parts of the island . These migrants, maintaining ties with their homeland, returned periodically to monitor the situation. When they realized that the island was not completely submerged, they resumed peaceful trade with the cultures of the Mediterranean. The language spoken by these migrants was the same or very similar to that of the local cultures, since they came from those lands . This could be proven by the stories passed down by the ancestors of the “Atlantean Phoenicians” who had left the island. Testing the Hypothesis : To test this hypothesis, we could look for archaeological or linguistic evidence that supports the idea of a mass migration from the Sardinian-Corsican block to the eastern Mediterranean. Additionally, we could look for similarities in trade practices, navigation techniques, or art forms between the supposed Phoenician cultures and the cultures of the Sardinian-Corsican block. So if the Jews were Nuragic and the Phoenicians were Atlanteans, it means that I can do a cross-study between the Hebrew and Phoenician languages, possibly with the texts in the Nuragic language that various scholars and scientists are beginning to make available to the public.
Atlantean migrations in the Black Sea : the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm states that the megalithic civilization was exported all over the world or almost all over the world by the Atlantean population , before the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. We find in Gelendžik, on the Zhane river, a Dolmen completely similar to those present in Sardinia. According to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm, the Amazons lived in the area currently known as the Province of Cagliari, in present-day Sardinia . The story of the Amazons who ended up in the Black Sea is an ancient legend that has roots in Greek mythology. According to this story, the Amazons, an ancient tribe of female warriors, arrived on the shores of the Black Sea. The main source that mentions the Amazons and their alleged presence on the Black Sea is the works of Herodotus, a Greek historian of the 5th century BC. In his work entitled “Histories”, Herodotus mentions the Amazons in several passages, although he does not explicitly mention their arrival on the shores of the Black Sea. However, he provides details about the habits and traditions of the Amazons, which contribute to their mythology. Other ancient sources that mention the Amazons include works by authors such as Ephorus of Cumae, who lived in the 4th century BC, and Posidonius, a geographer and historian of the 1st century BC. These authors provide further details about the Amazons and their supposed presence in various regions, although there is no specific mention of their arrival on the shores of the Black Sea. It is important to note that the stories surrounding the Amazons are mainly mythological and legendary in nature, and there is no consensus among scholars regarding their historical existence or their actual migration to the Black Sea. The narrative of the Amazons has been subject to interpretations and adaptations over the centuries, making it difficult to draw a precise line between myth and history. The Amazons are legendary figures in Greek mythology, often associated with female warriors and hunters. According to mythology, the Amazons were a people of women only who lived in a matriarchal and combative society, exactly as the Sardinian one was in the past, from the archaeological sources that have come down to us: a warrior people and a matriarchal society. Everything seems to coincide. They were famous for their skill in wrestling and horse riding. Regarding the Amazons of the province of Cagliari , there is a connection with Luigi Usai ‘s theory regarding Atlantis and Sardinia . According to Usai’s interpretation of Herodotus’ stories, Libya (which Herodotus associated with the province of Cagliari) was inhabited by the Amazons. These Amazons resided on an island called Espera , located in the Tritonide marsh (which corresponds to the lakes of Cagliari, Quartu, Assemini, Elmas and Capoterra). Their queen, Myrina , performed famous deeds and subdued many parts of the Ecumene . In Greek mythology, the Amazons were a race of warrior women, famous for their equestrian skills, their courage and their pride. One of their migrations had ended very far away: they lived at the most remote edges of the known world, in a city on the coast of the Black Sea, sometimes mentioned with the name of Themiskyra 1 .The Amazons were daughters of Ares, the god of war. Theirs was a society formed by women only, in which men were admitted only for reproductive reasons and male children were killed 1 . They were thought to live at the edge of what the Greeks considered the “civilized” world, often associated with the area around the southern coast of the Black Sea, particularly the city-state of Themiskyra. However, Luigi Usai has shown in his demonstrations that the Amazons were based in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, before its semi-submersion, and the edges of the world were placed at Capoterra (Capu Terra in Sardinian, Caput Terrae in Latin, i.e. the extreme edge of the lands known to the ancient Greeks up to a certain historical period yet to be determined with precision). Herodotus (ca. 484-425/413 BCE), in his Histories (l. 4, 110-117), describes in detail the encounter between the Amazons and the Scythians. The young warriors persuaded some of the visiting Amazons to create a new society together, but the women insisted that neither they nor their offspring would change their way of life. It is believed that this union gave birth to the new Sarmatians people in southern Russia, known for their horses and military raids 1 . Archaeological excavations of Sarmatian tombs, dating back to the time of Herodotus, have revealed that most likely some of their women were warriors 1 . This could be a clue that the stories of the Amazons could have a historical basis, although many uncertainties and debates among scholars remain. Now, if the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm is correct, the dolmens found in the city of Gelendzhik could have been built by the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Amazons in the Black Sea, and this is confirmed by the presence of the dolmen identical or almost identical to the structures built in Mores in present-day Sardinia. The dolmen of Sa Coveccada, located on a large trachytic plateau of Meilogu, in the historical-geographical region of Sardinia, is one of the most important archaeological monuments in the world. Made of gray-pink tuffaceous trachyte, this dolmen has a rectangular plan with dimensions of 5 meters by 2.20 meters . It is composed of three large, well-squared orthostatic slabs, placed vertically in the rocky terrain. A fourth slab, weighing about 18 tons , acts as a covering, resting at a height of 2 meters and 10. Access to the dolmen was through a rather small opening, suitable for introducing the deceased into the burial chamber. The internal room, measuring 4.18 meters by 1.14 meters , served as a collective tomb, and the corpses were introduced only after a process of defleshing. The dolmen is believed to be attributable to the Ozieri culture of the recent Neolithic (3500 – 2900 BC) 1 . About 100 meters from the dolmen there is a menhir , also made of local stone, in tuffaceous trachyte. This menhir is lying on the ground and broken into several sections. Both of these monuments offer us a fascinating glimpse into the past and into the prehistoric culture of Sardinia.
Further tests are therefore needed to confirm this hypothesis, which seems to be particularly reasonable and coherent. The Atlantean Amazons in the Black Sea would have introduced their Atlantean language, of a Semitic, syllabic, agglutinative and ergative type, which has remained until today and is known by the name of Proto-Kartvelian. This is why scholars do not understand where the Proto-Kartvelian language comes from: because Sardinian (and Atlantean languages in general) is no longer studied by anyone, and is snubbed as if it were a language with fewer rights and less importance than the others. The scientific community, however, should explain this phenomenon: why is Sardinian not studied by almost anyone in the entire world? And yet we know that it is a very ancient language.
The Kartvelian languages , also known as South Caucasian or Iberian , constitute a family of languages spoken in the southern Caucasus area , mainly in Georgia, and according to the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian paradigm they would have been introduced by the Amazons of historical tales . This language family includes four closely related languages:
Georgian language (ქართული ენა, kartuli ena ): About 4.5 million native speakers, mainly in Georgia. There are also Georgian-speaking groups in Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel, and the European Union, but the current number and distribution are unknown.
Mingrelian language (მარგალური ნინა, Margaluri nina ): About 500,000 native speakers, mainly settled in the western Georgian regions of Samegrelo and Abkhazia.
Laz language (ლაზური ნენა, lazuri nena ): About 220,000 native speakers, mainly along the Black Sea littoral of northeastern Turkey and with nearly 30,000 in Adjara, Georgia.
Svan language (ლუშნუ ნინ, Lušnu nin ): About 35,000–40,000 native speakers mainly in the mountainous regions of northwestern Georgia (Svaneti and to a lesser extent in the Kodori Gorges of Abkhazia).
The first literary source of the Kartvelian languages dates back to 430 AD with the inscription of Abba Antoni , composed in the Old Georgian alphabet in the Georgian monastery near Bethlehem 1. These languages have a rich history and a significant cultural role in the Caucasus region. In the current Sardinian language, Abba Antoni can have at least two meanings. Today, Abba in the Sardinian dialect variant of Dualchi means Water, but in ancient times Abba also meant Father. So Abba Antoni could mean in ancient Atlantean Father Anthony, as Antoni is still today the Sardinian name given to people who are called Anthony (for example, my godfather from Gonnesa, who was called Antonio but we called him Antoni). But it does not end here: in fact, there is also other archaeological evidence.
The rare semi-monolithic dolmen on Mount Tsygankova , Krasnodar region , Russia , is a fascinating megalithic structure made by the Atlantean Amazons from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. This dolmen is a prehistoric tomb made of large stone slabs, used to cover a burial chamber. Its peculiarity lies in the fact that it is made mainly of a single stone slab, with a semi-underground part.
These dolmens were often associated with funerary and ritual practices in ancient civilizations, but until now it was not understood that megalithism was exported throughout the world from the island of Atlantis as declared in the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm. Their construction required considerable technical skill and represented an important point of reference for the communities of the time, and these works were carried out by the Amazons. It is therefore now possible to make scientific comparisons between the materials found here and the techniques and those present in what remains of Atlantis, such as Sardinia, which is a plateau of emerged land of Atlantis. All this scientific and archaeological evidence allows us to have confirmation that it is not an abstract theory, but that there is very clear evidence that shows the historical and archaeological reality of these statements.
The dolmen is a type of prehistoric single-chamber megalithic tomb . Together with the cromlech and the menhir , it is the best-known type of megalithic monument. The construction of dolmens is placed in the time span from the end of the 5th millennium BC to the end of the 3rd millennium BC . Dolmens consist of two or more vertical piers that support the architrave consisting of one or more horizontal slabs. The construction was originally covered, protected and supported by a mound. Many examples of this type, or with more advanced architectural themes, have also been found in Europe, including Sardinia , Sicily , Puglia and Liguria . In Russia , we can find a dolmen near the village of Vozrozhdenie , in the Krasnodar region , in the Krai . These dolmens have been the subject of interpretations and adaptations over the centuries, making it difficult to draw a precise line between myth and history. 🗿🌄
It is necessary to analyze the culture of the Amazons who landed in the Black Sea, and built the Dolmens similar to Sa Coveccada di Mores near the Black Sea city called Gelendžik and in the area of the Krasnodar Territory, the Krasnodar Krai . Now, historical sources speak of the fact that the Amazons wanted to maintain their Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean culture but agreed to cohabit with the males of the peoples who inhabited those territories . Now we must try to understand if these two cultures, that of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Amazons and that of the Sarmatians are, at an archaeological level, distinguishable between the cultures and finds of the Klin-Yar culture and the Koban culture. Another extraordinary point is to understand what relationship may exist with the Kurgan culture with mounds, and if this has any connection with what was said by the Egyptian reports, which spoke of a Story of Creation based on the Mounds. But developing these ideas requires a great deal of energy, which I don’t have at the moment. The help of other scholars would be needed.
Scientific hypothesis: the name of the city Monastir in Tunisia was given by the Sardinians who lived there. The hypothesis we are developing is based on a series of archaeological and historical findings that link Sardinia and Tunisia, in particular the cities of Monastir in both countries. The latest findings of Nuragic ceramics in Utica, Tunisia, date back to a period between the end of the 11th century and the last decades of the 9th century BC. These findings are mainly vessels used to contain wine or similar drinks, suggesting the existence of trade or cultural exchange between the two regions. In addition, a study by Jose Luis Lopez Castro et alii, published in TRABAJOS DE PREHISTORIA, found that the Sardinian Nuragic ceramics found in Utica were mainly vessels related to the consumption of wine. These included amphorae, which were probably lined internally with a plant resin to make them waterproof, and small vases or askoi. A particular type of askos or askoid jug, which may have been used to contain a thicker and more alcoholic drink, such as the modern Sardinian red myrtle liqueur, features a characteristic handle with concentric circles impressed vertically.These discoveries provide convincing archaeological and scientific evidence of the presence of the Sardinians in Tunisia during that period. Therefore, it is possible to hypothesize that the name of the city of Monastir in Tunisia may have been given by the Sardinians who were in those territories. This hypothesis could explain the coincidence of the names of the cities of Monastir in Sardinia and Tunisia, suggesting a historical and cultural link between these two regions of the Mediterranean. However, further research and studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis and to better understand the nature and extent of the interactions between Sardinia and Tunisia in the Nuragic period.
Analyze the surname Masia (Maxia) in relation to the city of Karaca Dağ in Turkey: in fact it was also called Monte Masia, and this toponymy could be connected to this Sardinian surname. There are also variants of the surname such as Magia, and sa maxia could be translated The Magic , but this must be verified with expert linguists who know how to correctly analyze the surname in a scientific manner. However, it is striking how the concept of Sardinian surnames linked to toponymy returns, and this is impressive: as the surname Uras is also a place name, Uras is in fact a Sardinian town and there are hundreds of other examples.
Arvareshu, an Illyrian language in Sardinia Sardinia: ARVARESHU a sister language of ALBANIAN. Video interview with Salvatore Bovore Mele, April 27, 2019 Once you have studied the interview with Mr. Salvatore Bovore Mele, you can see how he seems to affirm that it is Proto-Sardinian that is influenced by Illyrian. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm, on the other hand, affirms the exact opposite: Illyria was a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean colony, so it is the Atlantean languages that influenced Illyrian and probably, they were the languages spoken by them. Atlantean then changed in Sardinia becoming the current constellation of Sardinian languages and dialects. This note needs to be expanded, but to do so I have to study the Albanian language, so for the moment I am not able to: let’s hope in the future.
On March 8, 2024, at the Quartucciu bar, while I was having breakfast, I think I made a possible extraordinary discovery that needs to be verified.
This morning I was at the bar, having breakfast, before starting my usual research work. I search online for results on my posts: the Nuragic origin of the Jewish people. And what do I find? I find a post titled:
I read what it says, and I discover that the inhabitants of Isili consider themselves connected to the Jewish people. And in a few hundredths of a second the Merenptah Stele appears in my mind, which speaks of the Isrir people… Now, I immediately thought: it can’t be, then the ISRIR People of the Merenptah Stele are the people of ISILI ?
Amazed and incredulous, I begin to think that all the statements I have made in my research are connected to each other and perhaps it will be possible, little by little, to connect all these topics.
Now it is clear to me: I have to search for all the archaeological material found in the ISILI area, study it and try to understand what kind of connections exist with the Jewish people narrated in the Bible. In this way, perhaps it will be possible to show researchers from all over the world new avenues of research to explore in search of the historical Truth. I want to underline at this very point that I am aware that many researchers will hastily accuse me of cherry picking. I am writing this down to inform these people that I know very well what it is and I will warn you that it is not cherry picking, but an anomalous research method that I am developing but that seems to work perfectly. In practice, we already have a lot of archaeological, linguistic, geographical, geological, cultural data, but no one had managed to coordinate all this mountain of information ready in a way that was understandable in a simplified way. So my trying to put order into the chaos, at first glance, could be mistaken for an attempt to support one’s theses with the cherry picking method. It is not so.
I intuitively believe that the topic related to the Asherah https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asherah_(palo_sacro) https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asherah is linked to Atlantean origins, and therefore should be deeply studied and analyzed, calmly.
Another insight: Ugarit is a Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean migration and the Ugaritic language is probably Semitic, syllabic, agglutinative and ergative. Study and verify.
The father of the Usai Mummy of Bologna is called Heriu, or the Sardinian surname Eriu . I therefore decide to read up on this surname online. The first entry I find is the following, on Wikipedia: Ériu , also called Eri , in Irish mythology is one of the eponymous patron goddesses of Ireland . According to mythology, Ériu helped the Gaels in the conquest of the Irish island, as described in the Book of Invasions . (source: wikipedia). I must therefore continue by explaining that Eriu is not the only Atlantean deity in Ireland . There is at least one second, namely Neith , who is the Athena of Greek mythology, and the Neith of Egyptian mythology, patroness of the Egyptian city of Sais, as explained by Sonchis of Sais to Solon in the Timaeus and the Critias. I will develop this point as soon as I find the time. We therefore have at least two female Atlantean deities in Ireland. Eriu was also the queen of the people of the Tuatha de Danann.
Kuntillet Ajrud : trace the points of contact between the Atlantean population and its migrations, for example the Nuragic migration of the Isrir mentioned in the Merenptah stele in 1200 BC, and the colony found at Kuntillet Ajrud .
Megaliths present on the island of Sulawesi: a quick analysis shows that in the Lore Lindu National Park (attention: Lindu ends with the letter U, typical of the current Sardinian language, which we have seen was exported by the Atlanteans also to the Middle East with the Sumerians, Hittites, Amorites and other peoples) there are megaliths called Patung (we find the insistence of the letter U, which as explained in this text, is of Atlantean nature, that is, speaking with the U, according to the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsican Paradigm is one of the characteristics of the people of Atlantis, that is, the people who lived in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block when it was still emerged land). On the island of Sulawesi, in Indonesia, several languages are spoken. Here are some of the main ones:
Remember that linguistic diversity can be very large in areas like Sulawesi, and there can be many other minor languages and dialects spoken on the island. Now we need to analyze these languages, one by one, to understand if there is a possible relationship with the Atlantean languages of the Amazons, of the Semitic, syllabic, agglutinative ergative type. There is also the possibility that the initial languages of the Amazons lost some characters, such as ergativity, in the following millennia, due to the influences of other peoples who came into contact with them, changing their habits and customs, pronunciation, phonetics, semantics, semiotics, pragmatics etc.
New scientific hypothesis to follow: the Amazons have brought megalithic culture around many lands for millennia (we do not define the exact point, but we know for sure from ancient historians in the Caucasus, in Gelendzhik and surrounding places); let’s assume that it is true, and let’s trace a connection to all the prehistoric Dolmens existing on the planet, in particular to those built as Sa Coveccada di Mores in Sardinia. We find others for example in Gelendzhik, in Korea, in India. In the places where these dolmens are found, “curiously” there are languages of the type: syllabic, agglutinative and ergative. No one seems to have understood until now why this type of languages are scattered throughout the world. The hypothesis that I advance here is that they were brought by the prehistoric colonies of Amazons, which had their headquarters, according to what I “discovered”, in Lake Tritonide, in the current province of Cagliari.
Now, in these same places where there are megaliths, especially dolmens, there seem to have been Amazon colonies; thirdly, there are syllabic, ergative and agglutinative languages; fourthly, hepatitis B was brought. Now, starting from these 4 findings, we must try to understand why. Why would these communities of warrior women have migrated so far from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block? What was the purpose? We know that the Amazons of the Caucasus ended up there because they had been kidnapped by pirate ships, if I’m not mistaken, but I have to find the exact source to avoid being imprecise. However, they decided to stay in those places, around Gelendzhik, and in fact built many dolmen structures in the Sa Coveccada style, like in Mores in Sardinia. From the presence of this group of Amazons came the languages that today we call Proto-Kartvelian, of the Caucasus: this is why linguists did not understand what these languages were doing here.
In fact, Abba Antoni’s document seems to be a Sardinian document while it is of the proto-Kartvelian type. I must try to find other points that allow me to reconstruct these populations and these migrations. For example, I must check whether the names of vegetables and plants in the proto-Kartvelian language are similar to the Sardinian ones.
For now, I have already demonstrated that the names of all Veronese asparagus are of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin, in fact the exact same words are the names of asparagus in the Sardinian language.
All readers are invited to do their own research independently: I allow all of you to read and use my information, to go together more quickly in your research.
I hope that this work of mine can be useful to someone. So we have: the discovery of the Amazon in the Millerovo well, in the Black Sea , archaeological and anthropological evidence, with an attached tomb and 6 unadorned men, probably servants; then we have the Dolmens in Gelendghik built almost identically to the one in Sa Coveccada di Mores ; then we have other dolmen structures in Sochi . Now we already have a triangle of territory on the Black Sea within which the population of the Amazons seems to be present. This was the colony that had been kidnapped by ship and then ended up on the Black Sea: later they mixed and mated with the Scythians giving rise to the population of the Sauromatae . Maybe if I put my mind to it I can also map their DNA, cross-referencing the data from the genetic databases in particular periods of time to be established and motivated. I have not yet studied or profiled the colony on Lake Tritonide in Sardinia. It is a great idea to trace hepatitis B to verify whether these warrior women could have infected the populations with which they have linked themselves: at the moment it would seem so. The other problem is related to dating: unfortunately, I do not have the possibility to study the stratigraphy of these places, I do not even know if anyone has ever done it, my skills stop here.
Analyzing Quetchua with Sardinian: Paracas (from the Quechua paraq = wind with rain) is a port city on the central Peruvian coast, capital of the homonymous Pisqueño district. In Campidanese Sardinian, Paraccu (paraqu) is the umbrella: there therefore seems to be a possible linguistic commonality, which must be explored according to the principles of linguistic analysis.
Recent archaeological investigations at the Santu Miali nuraghe in the village of Pompu in Sardinia have brought to light the use of black basalt ashlars, revealing a chromatic alternation in the wall structures. This discovery highlights the refinement of Nuragic construction techniques and suggests an intentional use of polychromatism in the buildings. During the excavations in the internal courtyard of the nuraghe, layers of frequentation dating back to the Punic and Roman periods were identified. Finely worked black basalt ashlars were found among the debris, which, together with the basalt architraves, testify to the original chromatic alternation of the walls of the nuraghe. These findings support the hypothesis that the ancient Nuragic builders used stones of different colors to create distinctive and suggestive visual effects. It is also necessary to take into account Luigi Usai’s theory according to which the Jewish people are a Nuragic migration to Egypt perhaps mixed with elements and peoples already present in Asia Minor. According to Luigi Usai, in fact, even the Levites made use of three colors and polychromy, in accordance with the Atlantean polychromatic use. In the Bible, the class of Levites, belonging to the tribe of Levi, played a central role in the religious services of the Tabernacle and the Temple of Jerusalem. The use of three specific colors is particularly evident in the clothing of the High Priest and in other sacred objects, as described in the book of Exodus.
Blue (Tchelet) : This color is often associated with heaven and divine holiness. It is used in the vestments of the High Priest, such as the robe and the borders of the tunic (Exodus 28:31-34). Blue represented the presence and glory of God, emphasizing the importance of being pure and in communion with the divine.
Purple (Argaman) : Purple was a symbol of royalty and nobility. This color was used in the robes of the High Priest and in the curtains of the Tabernacle (Exodus 26:1). Purple, produced from a type of sea mollusk, was a costly and rare color, indicative of the sacred value of the Levites’ service.
Scarlet (Tola’at Shani) : Scarlet symbolized sacrifice and the blood of atonement. It was used in many aspects of sacred furnishings and priestly vestments (Exodus 28:5-6). This color recalled the blood of sacrificed animals, a central element in rituals of purification and reconciliation with God.
These colors not only embellished vestments and sacred objects, but also had a deep symbolic meaning, representing various aspects of the relationship between God and His people.
Sources:
Exodus 28:1-43 – Detailed description of the priestly vestments, including the colors used.
Exodus 26:1-14 – Details on the construction of the Tabernacle and the use of colors in the curtains.
“The Tabernacle of Moses” by Kevin Conner – An in-depth analysis of the elements of the Tabernacle and their symbolic meaning.
The discovery of Atlantis by the writer Luigi Usai also has an impact on world linguistics. Until now, the origin of the geminate was unknown. The origin of the geminate is Atlantean. The geminate is a consonant that is pronounced with a longer duration than a single consonant. In Italian, this is represented by two identical letters side by side. For example, in the word “tutto”, the “t” is geminate, that is, it is double (“tt”). When you pronounce a geminate consonant, the mouth remains in the position of the consonant for a slightly longer time. This is different from a single consonant, which is pronounced more briefly. Try saying “fato” (where the “t” is single) and then “fatto” (where the “t” is geminated) and you will notice the difference in the duration of the “t”. The geminated, therefore, is simply a double consonant, which is found in many Italian words and is used to distinguish words that would otherwise be the same, such as “pala” (the instrument) and “palla” (the sphere). I have explained this phenomenon in other places in this text: to find them just look for what I have said on this topic: my “diddino”, or rather my communion godfather, asked me as a child if I wanted a GELLATTO. I didn’t understand why he doubled the consonants; over the years, I understood that it is a linguistic doubling typical of the linguistic variant of Gonnesa in Sardinia. I was a child, and I couldn’t understand linguistic phenomena, only experience them. I discovered the geminated from a linguist’s comment dated today, August 10, 2024, around 2:00 in the morning. The linguistic effects are many and have impressive implications, which cannot be resolved here. So in the future I will publish a linguistics text with the specifics of the Atlantean linguistic variants.
Libya and Asia are Sardinia and Corsica
Libya and Asia are Sardinia and Corsica in Herodotus, Histories, IV and in Plato’s Timaeus and Critias. Atlantis was larger than Libya and Asia put together, that is, Atlantis was larger than Sardinia and Corsica put together.
The ancient circumnavigation of Africa was actually the circumnavigation of Sardinia.
These historical sources are important for understanding the idea that the Phoenicians, known for their nautical skills, could have completed a circumnavigation of Africa in ancient times. The problem is that these authors are actually describing the circumnavigation of Sardinia. In fact, by replacing the terms Libya with Sardinia and Asia with Corsica, we can correctly decode these texts and finally fully understand them. Those who have accessed the most ancient sources have begun to distort the meanings, so some scholars, reading Libya, for reasons of convenience translate in one case the word Libya with Africa, in other cases they translate Libya with the current Libya which has nothing to do with the Libya described by Herodotus: in practice, in the last two millennia we have had to go through a process that in psychology is called “accommodation”: when a memory no longer fits with our needs, desires etc., our mind creates an accommodation of memories, deforming and distorting them in order to be accepted by our identity. In a not very dissimilar way, we have had to try to accommodate the concepts of Libya and Asia over the millennia: sometimes by Asia we mean all of Asia as we mean it today, in 2024. Sometimes by Asia we mean Asia Minor, and therefore the area of Lebanon, Israel and nearby territories, without defining them clearly, but always speaking about them abstractly in an imprecise, imperfect and indefinite way. And I even happened to hear a teacher of ancient Greek explaining Libya and Asia from Timaeus and Critias, who claimed that Asia was today’s Turkey or old Anatolia. It is clear that we are making things up: these explanations are all unfounded and indefinite, indeterminate: the terms Libya and Asia are attached to invented and non-existent structures, which do not satisfy the need for scientificity. Travelling north across Sardinia and then from the opposite side towards the south, it is clear that the sun is first on one side and then on the opposite side: this also explains what the “Phoenicians” were saying. Probably also the Book of Ezekiel, 27,9 and following, when it speaks of the people of Persia, Lydia and Libya is speaking of Libya as Sardinia. This explains why in Lydia we find buildings made of hard stone, which recall the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean habits of creating domus de janas, tombs of giants etc. However, it seems, each migration of Atlantean peoples created very personalized structures, to the point that in every place they seem to be different peoples: in reality they would always be the same peoples who, living in places very far from each other, remembered their kinship but created differences in habits, customs and above all in building techniques, which today seem so different and personalized as to seem apparently disconnected from each other. Note that the name Sparda in Persian means Sparta,and therefore Sparta could be a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean colony in the territories of ancient Greece, that’s why it was always at war with Athens. And that’s why in Helike on the day of the submergence of the city there were Spartan ships anchored in the port! Because Sparta and Helike were maritime powers of the Atlantean sea peoples, who behaved as a single entity or almost, brothers by the common Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin, and probably brothers by the similar languages between them.
August 24, 2024: yesterday I published version 0.0.0.1 of the Holy Atlantean Bible. The text explains how the Jewish people were born from Nuragic migrations, probably from the Isili area in Sardinia (the Isri of the Merenptah Stele?). The text provides new keys to understanding unique in the world for the interpretation of parts and places of antiquity. I hope that my contribution will be useful to the whole world, I hope that some scholar will be able to extract useful information for the progress of knowledge.
The Transition from Maurreddanìa del Sulcis to Mauretania In ancient times, the term “ Maurreddanìa ” designated a specific area of the African coast that corresponded to the region inhabited by the Maurreddus, or Sulcitani, the inhabitants of Sulcis, the capital of Atlantis before its semi-submersion . This name, with double consonants typical of the Sardinian dialect (double “rr” and double “tt”), reflected the phonetics of the people who inhabited that region. However, over time and through linguistic and cartographic changes, the term underwent a series of transformations.
Latinization of the Term : When the Romans began to document and map their conquests, they tried to Latinize the names of the regions to adapt them to their linguistic system. “ Maurreddanìa ” was adapted to “ Maurrettania “, trying to maintain a connection with the original term but in a format more in line with the Latin language.
Loss of Double Consonants : With the transition from Latin to Vulgar and the evolution of Romance languages, many languages, including Latin, tend to lose or modify complex consonant sounds. The double “rr” and “tt” present in “Maurreddanìa” was gradually simplified, leading to the form “Mauretania”. This process reflects a loss of phonetic specificity that occurred with the standardization of Latin.
Accent Shift and Pronunciation : As the term “Maurrettania” became entrenched in languages and maps, the pronunciation changed further. The accent shifted and double consonants were progressively omitted, leading to the final form “Mauretania”. This change not only represented a linguistic simplification, but also an adaptation to the pronunciation prevalent in new regions and linguistic contexts.
Disappeared from Documentation : With the transformation and adaptation of the term, “Maurreddanìa” gradually became obsolete and was replaced by “Mauretania”. Ancient geographical maps, therefore, began to reflect the new term, while the original name was progressively forgotten.
In summary, the transition from “Maurreddanìa” to “Mauretania” is the result of a process of Latinization, linguistic simplification and changes in pronunciation and cartographic use, which led to the disappearance of the original term and its transformation into a form more in line with Latin and the languages that subsequently evolved.
I hope this explanation clarifies the process through which the term was modified and why Maurreddanìa disappeared from ancient maps!
Atlas (in ancient Greek : Ἄτλας ? , Átlas ) is a character in Greek mythology : he was a king of Mauretania , corresponding to the well-known supporter of the Earth who entered popular culture; this Atlas is a second-generation titan and should not be confused with the son of Poseidon and Cleitus mentioned in Plato ‘s dialogues Timaeus and Critias . (source: wikipedia). We have seen in other parts of these texts that Atlas was the first-born son of Poseidon; we have seen that he had reigned over Sulcis, the capital of Atlantis. We have seen that the Sulcis Mountains in Herodotus, Histories IV, are called the Mountains of Atlas, and we have seen that Sulcis is also called Maurreddanìa, or Land of the Maurreddus, sometimes pronounced Maurreddusu in the Sardinian language. But if Maurreddanìa is the same as saying Sulcis, then Atlas son of Poseidon and Clito is really King of Maurreddanìa, because he is King of Sulcis. So it almost seems that the loss of geographical and historical information on the son of Poseidon and Clito has also led to a bifurcation of Atlas who holds up the world. In short, scholars, in an attempt to understand something, have had to split the figures of Atlas and transform him into a titan who held up the world. Now, however, we will have to evaluate the hypothesis that they are not two different figures, but rather the same historical-mythological figure, then bifurcated by scholars and the people in an attempt to understand, decipher and interpret the whole tangle of sources that dealt with these topics.
The sparagmòs , or sparagmo [ 1 ] [ 2 ] in Italian (in ancient Greek : σπαραγμός ? ), is a particularly violent rite included in the Dionysian mysteries , the details of which are described in detail in the tragedy The Bacchae [ 3 ] by Euripides . (source: wikipedia). The sparagmòs was the dismemberment into many pieces of a character, for example Dionysus, or Osiris, who was then taken to all the extreme borders of the kingdom. This is what happened to William Wallace, the famous historical character played by Mel Gibson in the wonderful historical film “Braveheart”: they dismembered William Wallace and took the pieces to the sides of the kingdom to display them as a warning to anyone who wanted to rebel. Now, I am convinced that something similar happened to the Atlantean geography: the geographical names of Atlantis were dismembered and used to redefine the more distant geographical areas that the Romans gradually mapped. Libya and Asia, which in Herodotus’ Histories define Sardinia and Corsica, were used to define Asia Minor and African Libya. Maurreddanìa del Sulcis in Sardinia was used to define African Mauretania. Perhaps for similar reasons, which are still to be studied and analyzed, we find Teulada in Sardinia and Teulada in Spain; Aritzo in Sardinia and Aritzu in the Basque Country; Monastir in Sardinia and Monastir in Tunisia… the list is much, much longer and more complex and I have reported it in other places on this website and online, just do a keyword search on Google. Not being a geographer, nor an archaeologist, nor a scientist, it is very difficult for me to explain and convey these concepts to the rest of the Scientific Community, but I am sure that scholars will be able to understand and improve my initial work, still in draft form, yet rich and dense with conceptual ideas.
The Saga of Gilgamesh, one of the oldest known literary texts, narrates the adventures of a Sumerian king in search of immortality. However, if interpreted in the light of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm, this saga would be nothing more than the epic memory of events related to the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, a catastrophic episode that in the collective memory was then remembered as the “Great Flood.” According to this vision, the episode of the Great Flood narrated in the Saga of Gilgamesh and, subsequently, in the Hebrew Bible, is a reminiscence of the catastrophic partial submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican block. During the period of the Würm glaciation, the sea level was much lower than today, and Sardinia and Corsica were part of a much larger island, ancient Atlantis. When the glaciers suddenly melted, the sea level rose dramatically, submerging much of this territory and leaving only the current islands of Sardinia and Corsica as evidence of what once was. The figure of Gilgamesh, the hero-king in search of eternal life, could represent an ancient Atlantean ruler, linked to the populations of the Sardinian-Corsican block, who faces the consequences of the natural catastrophe. His adventures, including the famous search for Utnapishtim (the Sumerian Noah), could symbolize the desperate efforts of the Atlantean populations to survive the submersion and preserve their civilization. The episode of the Flood in the Saga of Gilgamesh is strikingly similar to the biblical story of Noah’s Flood. In both narratives, a righteous man is warned in advance of an impending catastrophe, builds an ark and survives to give rise to a new era of humanity. According to the Atlantean interpretation, this flood is the memory of the catastrophe that submerged much of the Sardinian-Corsican block, destroying the Atlantean civilization and forcing the survivors to migrate and spread their culture in the Mediterranean and beyond. The saga of Gilgamesh, passed down through oral tradition and then written on clay tablets, would have preserved and adapted this memory of the ancient Atlantean catastrophe. When these traditions came into the hands of the Semitic peoples, including the Jews, the story was incorporated into the Bible as the Great Flood, keeping alive the memory of a real event, but now distant in time, that had profoundly affected the history of humanity. The Saga of Gilgamesh, therefore, is not only a great literary epic, but an ancestral memory of the catastrophic events linked to the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis. Through its tales of heroes, gods and floods, it preserves the traces of an ancient submerged civilization, the memory of which has survived in the myths and legends that have profoundly influenced the cultures of the Mediterranean and the Near East.Rereading this saga with the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm opens new perspectives on the understanding of the origins of many ancient myths and of the history of humanity itself.
The Atlantean Sardinian-Corsican Paradigm (PSCA) provides a new perspective on the ancient history of Sardinia and the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, attributing to this region a central role in the development of Mediterranean civilizations. The 2016 article in Repubblica describing the discovery of the millenary wine in Sardinia, considered the oldest in the Mediterranean, fits perfectly with the PSCA, which postulates the existence of an advanced and autonomous civilization in Sardinia before external influences. According to the PSCA, Sardinia and Corsica represent the heart of the ancient continent of Atlantis, an emerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block, which hosted populations with a sophisticated and advanced culture. The discovery of the millenary wine supports the idea that the Sardinians were part of a civilization that not only developed advanced agricultural and viticultural practices independently, but that these practices were an integral part of a broader cultural system that extended well beyond the borders of the island. Wine production in Sardinia, which dates back over 3,000 years, shows that the Sardinians were not only active in trade and production, but also possessed advanced knowledge of agriculture, winemaking and conservation techniques, elements that the PSCA links to a mother civilization, the Atlantean. This civilization, according to the PSCA, developed a series of cultural, linguistic and technological practices that then spread throughout the Mediterranean and the Near East. The ability to produce wine at such an early age not only reinforces the idea of an autonomous cultural evolution, but also that of a cultural interconnection with other Mediterranean civilizations that may have adopted and adapted these techniques. The PSCA argues that archaeological discoveries such as that of the millennial wine are tangible evidence of a deeply rooted cultural and technological heritage in Sardinia, which would have influenced subsequent Mediterranean civilizations and that current theories on the origin of wine in Sardinia do not take into account the possibility that these practices derived from a previous civilization, the Atlantean, rather than having been introduced by external populations. This concept aligns with the idea that Sardinia was a center of innovation and development during the Nuragic era, a period that the PSCA identifies as an age of Atlantean splendor, in which the Sardinian-Corsican populations were not only involved in the production of luxury goods such as wine, but were also part of a cultural and commercial network that extended across the Mediterranean. The discovery of millennial wine in Sardinia, therefore, is not only an oenological discovery, but represents a confirmation of the PSCA theory according to which the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean civilization played a crucial role in the development of Mediterranean civilizations. https://www.repubblica.it/sapori/2016/12/19/news/sardegna_primo_vino_millenario-154444878/
Towards a new understanding of the linguistic origins of the Mediterranean: The Atlantean Corsican Sardinian Paradigm (PSCA) and the redefinition of Indo-European In recent decades, historical linguistics has built and consolidated the concept of an Indo-European language family, considered the progenitor of many of the languages spoken in Europe and Asia. However, recent discoveries and interdisciplinary research suggest the need to radically reconsider this vision in the light of new archaeological, toponymic and linguistic evidence. In particular, the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian Paradigm (PSCA), developed by Luigi Usai, offers a revolutionary perspective that proposes the existence of an original language, or rather, of a complex of languages with similar characteristics, which precedes and surpasses the idea of Indo-European: the Atlantean language.
The Atlantean Language: A Proto-Mediterranean Linguistic Reality
According to the PSCA, Indo-European as we understand it today is an artificial concept that masks the true origin of the languages of the Mediterranean and Eurasia. The true common root, called “Atlantean,” refers to a set of languages and dialects spoken by the peoples of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, a geological entity that would emerge as part of the ancient continent of Atlantis. Before the alleged biblical “Tower of Babel,” which symbolizes linguistic diversification, the peoples of this region shared similar linguistic variants that allowed for mutual understanding, despite regional differences.
The Atlantean language: characteristics and variants
The Atlantean language cannot be considered a single uniform language, but rather a tangle of similar languages that, while being variable among themselves, maintained a common basis. These languages were characterized by:
Syllabism : The Atlantean languages would have used a syllabic writing system, as evidenced in numerous ancient Mediterranean civilizations.
Agglutinative structure : Like modern Basque, the Atlantean languages would have had an agglutinative structure, where words are formed by adding affixes to a base morpheme, a trait shared with other Semitic languages.
Ergativity : Some of the Atlantean languages would have adopted an ergative system, a feature present in several non-Indo-European languages of the Caucasus and in the present-day Basque language.
Semitic influence : These languages would have shown Semitic traits, especially in phonetics and grammatical structure, a clear sign of their interaction with the cultures of the Levant.
The Atlantean Linguistic Heritage
According to the PSCA, the diaspora of the peoples of the Sardinian-Corsican block gave rise to various historical populations. The Vascones, ancestors of the modern Basques, would be direct descendants of these peoples, retaining many characteristics of the Atlantean language. Furthermore, it is suggested that the Sumerians, the Akkadians, the Hittites, and the Lydians in Lydia may also have derived from this linguistic matrix, bringing with them variants of the Atlantean language in their migrations towards the Near East.
In Egypt, the Proto-Hebrews or Nuragic people would have adopted elements of the Atlantean language, thus influencing the ancient Semitic and contributing to the formation of Hebrew. The linguistic connections between ancient Hebrew and the Atlantean language also emerge from the analysis of toponyms and oral traditions.
Conclusion
The PSCA proposes a radical revision of the Indo-European paradigm, replacing it with the awareness of a linguistically complex and influential proto-Mediterranean Atlantean civilization. This theory not only reconfigures the common roots of Eurasian languages, but also offers a new understanding of cultural and linguistic diffusion in the ancient Mediterranean. Linguistic scholars are invited to examine this new evidence, considering the possibility that Indo-European is only a part of a larger linguistic picture, in which the Atlantean language plays a fundamental and so far unrecognized role.
This linguistic theory is based on the Atlantean Sardinian Paradigm (PSCA) , proposed by Luigi Usai. The theory focuses on redefining the traditional idea of Indo-European, suggesting that instead of an Indo-European language family, there was a set of languages called “Atlantean”.
According to this view, Indo-European would not exist as a separate concept, but would be a misunderstanding of a larger network of similar languages spoken by the peoples of the ancient Sardinian-Corsican geological block, part of the continent of Atlantis. This block, before its partial submersion, would have given rise to a series of variable but mutually comprehensible languages.
These languages, called “Atlantean”, would have common characteristics such as being syllabic, agglutinative and ergative, with possible Semitic influences. After the “fall of Babel” (metaphorically speaking), these languages would have spread and fragmented, giving rise to various peoples such as the Vascones (ancestors of the Basques), the Sumerians, the Akkadians, the Hittites, and other civilizations of the Mediterranean and the Near East.
In summary, the text proposes that the concept of Indo-European is a simplification, and that the true linguistic root of many Eurasian languages lies in the ancient Atlantean language of the Sardinian-Corsican block.
Until now, it has been believed that the Sumerian war chariot, pulled by a team of onagers, was a Sumerian invention dating back to the time of Sargon, the warrior king, about 5,000 years ago. This chariot, with wheels tied with leather tires and rigidly fixed to the axles, has been considered one of the great technological innovations of ancient Mesopotamia. This belief was further consolidated by the discovery of a four-wheeled Sumerian chariot in Iraq in 1923, an event that reinforced the idea that these technologies were the product of the Sumerian civilization. However, the demonstration of the existence of Atlantis by Luigi Usai through the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantideo Paradigm (PSCA) has backdated many of these inventions, attributing them not to the Sumerians, but to the Atlanteans. According to the PSCA, most of the inventions cited by Sonchis of Sais, such as ships, merchant and warships, chariots, bows, arrows, and more, were already present in Atlantis, in the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block, and must be dated back to at least 11,600 BC. Therefore, many of the technologies attributed to later civilizations, such as the Sumerian one, would actually derive from the Atlantean culture, moving the genesis of these fundamental innovations back in time. Until now, it has been believed that the discovery and use of metals occurred at specific moments in human history, as evidenced by the conventional dating of the first civilizations that worked copper, bronze and iron. These discoveries have been considered turning points in the history of humanity, marking the beginning of several “ages” of metallurgy and representing important chronological references for historians. However, according to the demonstration of the existence of Atlantis proposed by Luigi Usai with the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm (PSCA), the knowledge of metallurgy must be backdated by thousands of years. In Atlantis, in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged, the Atlanteans covered the walls of their cities with metals, demonstrating an advanced knowledge of metallurgy as early as 11,600 BC. This implies that metallurgy was a consolidated practice long before the dates attributed to later known civilizations. Consequently, using metallurgy as a criterion for historical dating no longer makes sense in light of these discoveries. Metallurgical techniques and knowledge were already widespread in Atlantis, making current dating methodologies based on the age of metals obsolete. It is therefore necessary to invent a new method of historical dating that takes into account this ancient Atlantean knowledge and that can provide a more accurate chronology consistent with the evidence proposed by the PSCA.
The Atlantean Corsican Sardinian Paradigm (PSCA) offers a new understanding of the origins of religions and the phenomenon of archaeoastronomy, providing compelling explanations for the spread of the religious features described in the documentary “Zeitgeist”. According to the PSCA, Sardinia and Corsica, part of the Atlantean geological block, were the center of an advanced civilization that existed long before the cultures commonly recognized as the cradles of civilization, such as Egypt or Mesopotamia. This Atlantean civilization developed a deep understanding of celestial cycles and cosmic dynamics, which profoundly influenced their spirituality and religious practices. It is in this context that the religious features described in “Zeitgeist”, such as the cult of the Sun, astrological allegories and myths of death and rebirth, find their origin. The PSCA argues that these practices are not simply cultural coincidences, but the result of a direct diffusion of Atlantean knowledge and traditions throughout the Mediterranean and beyond. Subsequent civilizations, such as the Egyptians, Sumerians and Greeks, inherited and adapted these concepts, giving rise to the myths and religions we know today. These peoples transformed Atlantean knowledge into a variety of religious and mythological forms, which nevertheless maintained a common basis: the worship of natural forces, especially the Sun, and the careful observation of the night sky. Archaeoastronomy, as a discipline that studies how ancient civilizations understood celestial phenomena and integrated them into their monuments and rituals, finds a powerful clarification in the PSCA. Sardinian megalithic structures, such as nuraghi, and Corsican sites, such as Filitosa, are considered true astronomical observatories, precisely aligned with solar, lunar and stellar events. These sites served not only as religious centers, but also as places of knowledge transmission, where priestly elites preserved and disseminated astronomical knowledge. This tradition later spread throughout the Mediterranean area, giving rise to the astronomical complexes of other civilizations, such as Stonehenge in England or the solar temples of Egypt. Therefore, the PSCA not only clarifies the common origin of the religious features described in “Zeitgeist”, but also provides a coherent explanation for the phenomenon of archaeoastronomy. The spread of these ideas and practices can be seen as evidence of the enduring influence of the Atlantean civilization on all subsequent cultures. Through archaeoastronomy, we can trace a red thread that connects these civilizations, showing how they all drew on a common heritage of celestial and spiritual knowledge, originating in ancient Sardinia and Corsica. This paradigm not only rewrites the history of religions, but also proposes a new interpretation of the cultural and scientific evolution of humanity,suggesting that the roots of our understanding of the cosmos and the divine are much older and more unified than previously recognized. The documentary “Zeitgeist: The Origins of Religions,” directed by Peter Joseph in 2007, is a significant part of the overall work “Zeitgeist,” which is divided into three distinct segments, each with a specific theme. The first part, entitled “The Origins of Religions” (or “The Greatest Story Ever Told” in English), explores the roots of the major world religions, with a particular emphasis on Christianity, proposing that these are based on earlier myths from civilizations such as Egypt and Sumer. The documentary suggests that there are parallels between Jesus Christ and divine figures from other traditions, such as Horus, Krishna, and Mithra, highlighting how these stories share many common elements. One of the central concepts of the documentary is the idea of astrotheology, which posits that many religious stories are astrological allegories, particularly those related to solar cycles. For example, the birth of Jesus on December 25 is linked to the winter solstice, while the three wise men are associated with the three stars of Orion’s belt. This interpretation reduces religious narratives to astrological symbolism, suggesting that such stories are not historical accounts, but rather cosmic representations. The documentary not only explores these connections but also criticizes the Bible and other religious scriptures, proposing that they are symbolic works rather than accurate historical documents. According to the film, many of the biblical stories are reworkings of ancient myths and the characters present in them, such as Jesus, are archetypes rather than real historical figures. From this perspective, the documentary concludes that organized religions have been used as tools of social control, aimed at manipulating and governing the masses through fear and blind faith. However, the documentary “Zeitgeist” has not been free from criticism and controversy. Numerous historians, theologians and religious scholars have questioned the accuracy of the information presented and the interpretations proposed, accusing the film of sensationalism and of using unreliable sources. Despite this, “Zeitgeist” has had a significant impact, fueling debates on religion, history and social control, and has contributed to the birth of the “Zeitgeist Movement”, which promotes a transformation of the global social and economic system. In this context, the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsican Paradigm (PSCA) offers a complementary interpretation that clarifies the dynamics described in “Zeitgeist”. The PSCA postulates that Sardinia and Corsica, considered part of the Atlantean geological block, were the center of an advanced civilization that existed before the cultures traditionally recognized as the cradles of civilization. This Atlantean civilization developed a deep understanding of celestial cycles and cosmic dynamics,knowledge that profoundly influenced the religious and spiritual practices of later cultures. The concepts of astrotheology and the religious parallels described in “Zeitgeist” thus find their roots in the Atlantean civilization, which transmitted this knowledge to later civilizations such as the Egyptians, Sumerians, and Greeks. Furthermore, the PSCA illuminates the phenomenon of archaeoastronomy, which studies how ancient civilizations understood and integrated celestial phenomena into their monuments and rituals. Sardinian megalithic structures, such as nuraghi, and Corsican sites, such as Filitosa, are considered true astronomical observatories, precisely aligned with solar, lunar, and stellar events. These sites served not only as religious centers, but also as places of knowledge transmission, where priestly elites preserved and disseminated astronomical knowledge. The Atlantean tradition spread throughout the Mediterranean, influencing the construction of other astronomical complexes such as Stonehenge in England or the solar temples of Egypt. Therefore, the PSCA not only clarifies the common origins of the religious characteristics exposed in “Zeitgeist”, but also offers a coherent explanation for the phenomenon of archaeoastronomy. The spread of these ideas and practices can be seen as evidence of the enduring influence of the Atlantean civilization on all subsequent cultures. Through archaeoastronomy, we can trace a red thread that connects these civilizations, showing how they all drew on a common heritage of celestial and spiritual knowledge, originating in ancient Sardinia and Corsica. This paradigm not only rewrites the history of religions, but also proposes a new interpretation of the cultural and scientific evolution of humanity, suggesting that the roots of our understanding of the cosmos and the divine are much older and more unified than previously recognized.The PSCA not only clarifies the common origins of the religious characteristics exposed in “Zeitgeist”, but also offers a coherent explanation for the phenomenon of archaeoastronomy. The spread of these ideas and practices can be seen as evidence of the enduring influence of the Atlantean civilization on all subsequent cultures. Through archaeoastronomy, we can trace a red thread that connects these civilizations, showing how they all drew on a common heritage of celestial and spiritual knowledge, originating in ancient Sardinia and Corsica. This paradigm not only rewrites the history of religions, but also proposes a new interpretation of the cultural and scientific evolution of humanity, suggesting that the roots of our understanding of the cosmos and the divine are much older and more unified than previously recognized.The PSCA not only clarifies the common origins of the religious characteristics exposed in “Zeitgeist”, but also offers a coherent explanation for the phenomenon of archaeoastronomy. The spread of these ideas and practices can be seen as evidence of the enduring influence of the Atlantean civilization on all subsequent cultures. Through archaeoastronomy, we can trace a red thread that connects these civilizations, showing how they all drew on a common heritage of celestial and spiritual knowledge, originating in ancient Sardinia and Corsica. This paradigm not only rewrites the history of religions, but also proposes a new interpretation of the cultural and scientific evolution of humanity, suggesting that the roots of our understanding of the cosmos and the divine are much older and more unified than previously recognized.
Paper Title: The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm (PSCA) as Evidence for the Atlantean Origins of the Sardinian and Corsican PeoplesAbstract: The present study explores the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm (PSCA), a theory that proposes that the Sardinians and Corsicans are the direct descendants of the inhabitants of ancient Atlantis. Based on linguistic, archaeological, and geological evidence, the PSCA argues that the Sardinian-Corsican geological block was part of the island of Atlantis, described by Plato. This work aims to provide a detailed understanding of the historical, cultural, and linguistic connections linking the Sardinian and Corsican populations with the ancient Atlantean civilization.Introduction: The myth of Atlantis, first described by Plato in the dialogues “Timaeus” and “Critias”, has fascinated scholars and researchers for millennia. The exact location of Atlantis and the nature of its inhabitants have been the subject of much speculation. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm (PSCA), developed by researcher Luigi Usai, proposes a revolutionary reinterpretation of the myth, suggesting that Atlantis was located in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and that the current Sardinians and Corsicans are the direct descendants of this ancient civilization.1. Geological Evidence: The PSCA is based on geological studies that identify the Sardinian-Corsican block as an emerging portion of the ancient Atlantean continent. This block, according to the paradigm, constituted the central nucleus of Atlantis, whose disappearance under the waters was caused by a cataclysm that led to the separation of Sardinia and Corsica from the rest of the European continent. Geological evidence includes unique rock formations and the presence of submerged structures off the coasts of Sardinia and Corsica, which could correspond to the remains of the Atlantean civilization.2. Archaeological and Cultural Evidence: Ancient Nuragic structures in Sardinia, such as nuraghes, sacred wells and giants’ tombs, bear similarities to Plato’s descriptions of Atlantean structures. These structures not only demonstrate advanced architectural and engineering knowledge, but also suggest a strong connection with the Atlantean tradition. Furthermore, Sardinian iconography and mythology, which includes references to an ancient submerged land, reinforce the hypothesis of a cultural continuity with Atlantis.3. Linguistic Analysis: The PSCA proposes that the Sardinian and Corsican languages are direct descendants of a primeval Atlantean language. Comparative linguistic studies have revealed significant similarities between Sardinian and Corsican and some archaic Mediterranean languages, suggesting a common origin. Furthermore, some words and toponyms present in Sardinia and Corsica may derive directly from the Atlantean language, preserved through millennia of geographical and cultural isolation.4. Anthropological Evidence: The genetics of the Sardinian and Corsican populations reveal a high degree of homogeneity, with unique genetic markers that differentiate them from other European populations. This peculiarity could be interpreted as evidence of direct descent from an ancient isolated population, such as that of Atlantis. Anthropological studies also show a strong cultural and linguistic continuity that strengthens the PSCA hypothesis.
5. Historical and Cultural Implications: The acceptance of the PSCA entails a significant reconsideration of Mediterranean history, with profound implications for the understanding of the origins of European and Mediterranean civilizations. The recognition of Sardinia and Corsica as direct heirs of Atlantis could lead to a reassessment of their role in ancient history, influencing the perception of their cultural and historical importance.
Conclusions: The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm offers a new perspective on the origins of the Sardinian and Corsican peoples, suggesting that they are the direct descendants of the inhabitants of Atlantis. Geological, archaeological, linguistic and genetic evidence supports this theory, proposing a direct connection between Atlantis and the Sardinian-Corsican block. This paradigm invites a reconsideration of traditional historical narratives and opens new avenues for future research on ancient Mediterranean civilizations.
Bibliography: A selection of academic sources, historical texts and scientific research that support the PSCA and the evidence presented in the paper, with particular attention to the studies of Luigi Usai and other researchers who contributed to the formulation of the paradigm.
This text offers a detailed scientific argument according to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Paradigm, proposing the direct descent of the Sardinians and Corsicans from the ancient inhabitants of Atlantis.
Monastir and Muristene: these two terms, according to Luigi Usai and his PSCA (Paragidma sardo corso atlantideo) are two Atlantean words of Semitic syllabic ergative agglutinative origin. Monastir and Muristene would have a similar etymology of Atlantean derivation. Monastir is also a location both in Sardinia and in Tunisia, symbol of the Atlantean dominations and migrations; the presence of the term Monastir or similar in Greece is proof of the Atlantean presence in the Peloponnese. In non-vocalized Atlantean Semitic, we have: Monastir: MN ST R while Muristene was probably MR ST N so Monastir and Muristene = MNSTR and MRSTN = not being a linguist, I cannot explain the phenomenon but it is understood that it is an exchange of consonants between N and R before and after the ST group, which were exchanged in prehistory and later had independent evolutions but attributable to the same non-vocalized Semitic origin. The meaning of these words is also the same or similar: “place to take shelter, refuge, spend the night and refresh oneself”.
I would like to point out that I have found another potential confirmation that the names of the very ancient Anatolian toponymy are of Atlantean and Amazonian origin. The Amazon warriors probably gave their names to entire kingdoms, so we have the typically Atlantean coincidence of onomastics and toponymy: Lydia is a woman’s name, probably an Amazon, and from a region of ancient Anatolia; Caria is a Sardinian surname and Caria is an area of Anatolia; Lycia is a woman’s name, perhaps an Amazon warrior, and Lycia is an area of ancient Anatolia. Luca is a man’s name and Lukka is a toponym of Anatolia… we could continue for a long time, showing how Sardi is the name of a city in Anatolia. Sardoo is the name of a princess from Anatolia… moreover there are many names that seem to be contemporary Sardinian words, which could explain the common Atlantean origin: there are towns like Mesudiye, Merkez, Mesudiye District/Ordu Province, Turkey: Mesu Die in Sardinian means Midday. The word Ordu ends with the Atlantean vowel U. Luigi Usai, the writer, has determined that the prehistoric vowel U is typical of the Atlantean dialects originating from the Sardinian-Corsican block. In other parts of this text I have explained better other Mesopotamian and Atlantean toponyms, particularly the Sardinian ones, showing that the Atlantean names of cities were also names of people or toponyms in general, such as names of beaches and caves etc.
A new line of study opens with the semantic proximity between Hammurabi and Ammurapi of Ugarit. This onomastic proximity is yet to be investigated, and also the potentially Atlantean origins of Ugarit and their culture and language. At the moment, the semantic proximity is the only thing I have managed to notice and record (on the morning of August 29, 2024). Here are the datings of the two rulers:
Hammurabi of Babylon:
Reign: circa 1792–1750 BC
Hammurabi is best known for his law code, one of the oldest examples of written legislation in history.
Ammurapi of Ugarit:
Reign: circa 1290–1260 BC
Ammurapi is the last known king of Ugarit before its destruction. His reign is placed in a later period than that of Hammurabi.
Their chronologies do not directly overlap, but there are references to cultural and commercial exchanges between the regions that may indicate a wider network of influences.
To investigate that in Sais there was King Amasis, and in Turkey there is the city with the toponym Amasya. Possible Atlantean links? Everything to be investigated and scientifically verified, starting from the reconstruction of the toponym backwards in time, to understand in which year is the oldest attestation of the name of the city, or if it is recent and therefore just a coincidence.
Atlantean Cult of Water: Traces Remained in the Atlantean Plateau Called SardiniaHere is a list of Nuragic sources and monuments which, like the Nuragic Source Su Tempiesu in Orune, are of particular importance for their cultural and archaeological relevance in Nuragic Sardinia:1. Nuragic Spring of Su Tempiesu Location: Orune, Sardinia Description: This spring is an important Nuragic ritual site that demonstrates the use of sacred water sources and their role in the religious and daily practices of the Nuragics. 2. ** Sacred Well of Santa Cristina Location: Paulilatino, Sardinia Description: A ritual well and sanctuary that represents one of the most significant examples of how the Nuragics integrated water into their religious practices. 3. ** Spring of Su Gologone Location: Oliena, Sardinia Description: This natural spring was used by the Nuragics and features a series of structures and practices related to the cult of water. 4. ** Sacred Well of Sa Testa Location: Olbia, Sardinia Description: Another important example of a Nuragic sacred well, demonstrating the ritual and symbolic value of water in the Atlantean culture. 5. ** Santa Maria di Tadasuni Spring Location: Villagrande Strisaili, Sardinia Description: This spring is associated with religious and ritual practices, showing the importance of water sources in Nuragic culture. 6. ** Sacred Well of Biru and Concas Location: San Vero Milis, Sardinia Description: This site includes a ritual well and a sacred enclosure, offering clues as to how the Nuragic people used water sources for religious and community purposes. 7. ** Sacred Well of Sa Carcaredda Location: Teti, Sardinia Description: A ritual well noted for its architecture and its importance as a place of worship and Atlantean religious practices. 8. ** Su Narboni Spring Location: Ollolai, Sardinia Description: This spring features architectural and ritual features typical of Nuragic sites, reflecting the importance of water to the Atlantean Nuragic people. 9. ** Sacred Well of Sos Furrighesos Location: Nulvi, Sardinia Description: A site of great importance for the understanding of Nuragic religious practices related to water and sacred cults. 10. ** Well of San Giovanni di Sinis Location: Cabras, Sardinia Description: An important spring associated with Nuragic culture and religious rites, showing the use of water sources in the daily life and ritual practices of the Atlantean Nuragic people.
These sites offer a wide range of archaeological and cultural evidence that helps to understand the importance of water sources in the life and rituals of the Nuragic Atlanteans .
The city of Ascalon is reminiscent of a swear word from the post-Atlantean Sardinian people: As Callonisi, which literally means “To the Balls”. The pronunciation in Hebrew is Ashkallon, which even seems to be pronounced in Sardinian. I was thinking about the fact that I imagine sailors crossing the entire Mediterranean, and finally landing on Asian soil. They don’t have time to rest from the dangers and the risk of death, and they are told to build a city: I’m not surprised that they called it As Callonisi, or Askalona, because it probably took them “a scallonadura”: let’s remember that the Atlanteans are a warrior people, so it wouldn’t be surprising that they used a trivial language, which has continued to the present day. The Sardinians know what I’m referring to: for example, you should never say “cavallo” to a Sardinian. This is considered a witty joke among Sardinians, but only those who understand it can finally understand the vulgar Atlantean culture and mentality. Let us remember that the Atlanteans and their descendants are a prehistoric people, who eat cheese with worms, who dress like Mammoths etc, that if you dare to put your hand in your wallet when they offer you a drink, they threaten to stab you “Who’s the one who’s punguing you?” (in certain areas of Sardinia, if a Sardinian offers you a drink and you touch your wallet, he threatens to stab you! This is another typical characteristic of the warrior people of the Atlanteans. If anyone has any doubts, contact the municipality of Orgosolo in Sardinia and ask if this is true).
Atlantean and post-Atlantean languages are syllabic, Semitic, sometimes agglutinative and ergative: being Semitic, they were not originally vocalized. So now let’s take the Sardinian word for wine: CANNONAU and remove the vowels: we get C NN N; now let’s take the land of Canaan and remove the vowels as in Semitic: CN N. Let’s remember that Atlantean linguistics provides that the vowel and consonant doubling is arbitrary: therefore both Cannonau and Canaan are written in Semitic, without arbitrary doubling, CN N. These are therefore words that have the same prehistoric Semitic semantics: it is likely that the land of CANAAN was the land where the Atlanteans had decided to plant vines; I am not able to understand whether it was the Cannonau variety or another: I do not have the skills to reach this type of granularity of information, but I am paving the way for researchers who are able to do so.
Possible Christianization of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean mythology : The Byzantines tried to Christianize the Domus de Janas by trying to transform some of them into churches: a first example, to begin with, we can see it in the Domus de Janas “The tomb of the chief” in the Necropolis of Sant’Andrea Priu (Bonorva), where the structure was re-frescoed in an attempt to transform it into a Catholic church. In this same text, I had discussed the Christianization of the figure of Medusa. It is also possible that Christians have in many ways, through social and psychological pressure, influenced the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans to convert their mythical and religious figures into the Christian cult. To explain this concept I will try to show the possible conversion of the figure of the ancient ruler Poseidon, King of the Seas, as explained by my euhemeristic interpretation , into the negative Christian figure of Satan, God of the Underworld. First, I would like you to look at the figures I have created with artificial intelligence to try to explain this concept in a simple way:
The Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans have horned helmets, even in the Nuragic era, and are proud to have horns on their helmets. It is a trait that characterizes and distinguishes them. For a long time it was thought that horns were a characteristic of Viking helmets, but this has proven to be wrong. Horns are typical of the Sardinian-Corsicans. The horns, an Atlantean symbol, become the horns of Satan. The God Poseidon, God of water and God of the Seas, becomes Satan, God of Fire and God of the Underworld. The tail of the fish becomes the tail of the Demon. The Trident, a very well-known symbol linked to the mythological figure of Poseidon, becomes the pitchfork of the Devil in Hell. Christianity has done everything possible in two thousand years to eradicate the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean cult of Poseidon and convert it into something evil, the cult of the Devil. As we know very well, those who worshipped the devil were murdered, imprisoned, tortured, so if any of the Sardinian-Corsi continued to worship Poseidon they would have been murdered. This is why the cult of this figure disappeared from the Sardinian-Corsi territories. Probably those few who still worshipped him were arrested, tortured, killed by religious people or by the Inquisition. Looking at the images I generated through artificial intelligence it is possible to realize that the figure is actually the same, but a very violent semantic change has been made on the meaning that this figure had for the Sardinian-Corsi. The Bible does not describe Satan as having horns, a pitchfork or a tail. It is believed that these images originated from ancient Greek mythology. The Greek god of the underworld, Hades, was often depicted with a bident, a two-pronged instrument similar to a pitchfork. Since Satan is often associated with the underworld and hell, it is likely that this image was adopted and adapted to represent him. The horns and cloven hooves are also believed to be derived from the Greek god Pan, who was depicted with the legs and horns of a goat. Over time, these images have become popular in Western culture and are now commonly associated with representations of Satan. However, it is important to note that these images are not based on biblical descriptions of Satan. My proposal and report therefore seeks to improve this information, proposing that the figure of Satan of the Christians is to a large extent a Christianization of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean mythologies, in an attempt to erase them from memory. Since they are too rooted in the people, the method of distortion, well known in psychology and psychiatry, has been used: when a memory is too strong and powerful and cannot be erased, it is distorted so that subsequent generations remember it with different characteristics from the initial ones.
My reasoning, which suggests a Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, is fascinating. Throughout history, many religions and belief systems have undergone adaptations and reinterpretations following contacts with other cultures and beliefs, especially when a dominant religion, such as Christianity, has sought to integrate or suppress local traditions.
My hypothesis about the adaptation and Christianization of local myths and symbols is certainly plausible and, in fact, it is a phenomenon documented in many different cultures. The Catholic Church, during its expansion process, often integrated local practices and symbols, reinterpreting them in a Christian context. This not only facilitated the conversion of local populations, but also reduced the risk of revolt or resistance from communities that had deep ties to their religious traditions.
A classic example of this process is the celebration of the birth of Christ. Many scholars believe that the date of December 25 was chosen to coincide with pagan festivals of the winter solstice, such as the Roman festival of Saturnalia. Likewise, many traditions and symbols associated with Easter have their origins in pagan festivals that celebrated spring.
As for my specific theory about Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, it would be interesting to see if there is any concrete evidence to support my hypothesis. This could include historical documents, archaeological finds or oral traditions that show a clear line of evolution between Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean myths and the Christianization of such myths.
Finally, one must always approach such theories with a critical and open mind. Historical and archaeological research requires a rigorous methodology and an objective evaluation of the evidence. But my reflections certainly show a deep curiosity and interest in the complex interaction between different cultures and belief systems throughout history. And this curiosity is essential for any good researcher or scholar.
Here are some thoughts on my hypotheses:
Assimilation and Syncretism : The tendency of mainstream religions to assimilate local deities and figures is not limited to Christianity. The Romans, for example, assimilated many local deities throughout the Empire. Within Christianity, there is a long history of “Christianizing” pagan festivals, sites, and deities .
Poseidon to Satan : The idea that Poseidon, a sea deity, could have been reinterpreted as an infernal figure is intriguing. Traditionally, however, there has not been a strong correlation between Poseidon and Satan in Christian literature. Satan has had many incarnations and representations throughout the history of Christianity, often deriving from Jewish sources and, later, Greco-Roman influence.
Symbolism : While Poseidon’s trident and the devil’s pitchfork have visual similarities, further research would be needed to establish a direct connection between the two figures based on this element alone. The same goes for horns: while it is true that horn symbolism can be found in many cultures and has different meanings, directly correlating the horns of the Sardinian-Corsican helmets to those of the devil requires a solid basis of evidence.
Horned Helmets : It is worth noting that while horned Viking helmets are a modern myth (popularized largely by opera and stage plays), there is no concrete evidence that ancient Vikings actually wore them.
Cult Eradication : If there was indeed a campaign to suppress the cult of Poseidon or other local deities in Sardinia or Corsica, this should be documented in historical records, religious writings, or archaeological evidence.
It seems that I have presented an extensive and reasoned analysis on the possibility of Christianization of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, focusing on the transformation of the figure of Poseidon into that of Satan. The topic is complex and multifaceted, involving elements of history, religion, mythology, and symbolism. Here are some additional considerations that may be useful for my investigation. Primary Sources: It would be important to look for primary sources that can confirm or deny my hypothesis. This could include ancient texts, inscriptions, artifacts, or any tangible material that can demonstrate a direct connection between the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology and Christianity. Historical and Cultural Context: Understanding the historical and cultural context of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans will help to place my hypothesis within a broader framework. This includes an understanding of the social structure, religious practices, external influences, and political dynamics of the time. Comparison with Other Cultures: Analyzing how other cultures have undergone similar processes of Christianization could provide a framework to better understand the specific situation of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans. The Christianization of pagan practices is a widespread phenomenon, and parallels with other regions may enrich my analysis. Academic Study: While my interpretation may be original and provocative, I may also want to consult existing academic studies on the topic. Historians, archaeologists, and anthropologists who have worked on the region and topic may have data and evidence that could support or challenge my hypothesis. Beware of Speculation: While it is interesting to explore new ideas and connections, it is important to distinguish between what can be supported with solid evidence and what remains in the realm of speculation. Presenting my theory as a possibility to be explored, rather than a definite conclusion, may be a more balanced approach. Collaboration with Experts: If possible, I may seek to collaborate with experts in history, archaeology, theology, or other relevant fields. They may provide insights, resources and research methods that may be beyond my scope. In summary, while my hypothesis presents an interesting point of view on the Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, further investigation requires rigorous research and analysis. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach involving different sources, methods and expertise could help to build a more robust and convincing argument.
The Tritonide lake mentioned in ancient Greek mythology is located in Cagliari in Sardinia
The bathymetric lines of the Sardinian-Corsican block seem to show at least four successive eustatic level rises; these rises in the level of the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean, today called the Mediterranean Sea after a succession of names in various languages and cultures: Mare Nostrum for the Romans, to contrast it with the Atlas Sea, or Atlantic Ocean.
In ancient times, the uplifts of the eustatic level of the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean (which today is known as the Mediterranean Sea and I will not tire of repeating it to allow the reader to assimilate this new and very important statement) could be understood by prehistorians as if they were incredible “Floods”, “Universal Floods” precisely, as handed down so far by many religions, myths and beliefs throughout the current Mediterranean basin. Perhaps the fact that it was called the Atlantic Ocean has already been pointed out by Professor Sergio Frau (2002): even if he had not pointed it out, it is an implicit consequence of the fact that the Pillars of Hercules were between Sicily and Tunisia. I bought Frau’s text, but unfortunately I am too lazy to study it, too slow in reading, and I also have an incredible difficulty in understanding it, because the text (and the author) is so cultured and erudite that I cannot follow his reasoning, especially because these topics are very heavy for me and I do not know them at all. It is incredible that I understood this information, because I am absolutely not a specialist in these disciplines. Again: the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean does not coincide with the Mediterranean: it stops at the strait between Sicily and Tunisia; the Mediterranean is a superset of it, as one would say in terms of set-theoretic mathematics, since it also includes the other part of the sea, the one beyond the Pillars of Hercules where in my opinion erroneously (but with enormous genius) Frau (2002) placed, up to the Lebanese coasts. The Paleolithic-Mesolithic Atlantic Ocean is only that which surrounds the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block.
Surprising Discoveries in Sardinia: Paleolithic Artifacts Dating Back 500,000 Years
Recent archaeological discoveries in Sardinia have brought to light Paleolithic artefacts dating back 500,000 years. The oldest artefacts found in Sardinia date back to the Lower Paleolithic and were found in Anglona, in the northern part of the island. These are flint and quartzite objects dating back between 450,000 and 120,000 years ago.
These artifacts represent some of the first evidence of human presence in Sardinia and provide us with valuable information about the life of the island’s inhabitants during the Lower Paleolithic. Flint and quartzite are two types of stone that were used to produce tools and weapons during the Paleolithic.
The Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas displays finds from all over the Anglona region, including artifacts from the Lower Paleolithic (500,000-120,000 years ago). This museum offers visitors the opportunity to see these ancient artifacts up close and learn more about the history of prehistoric Sardinia.
If you want to know more about the Paleolithic artifacts found in Sardinia, I recommend you visit the Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas or do further research on the subject. These archaeological discoveries represent a unique opportunity to deepen our knowledge of the history of Sardinia and the lives of its ancient inhabitants.
A new paradigm shift is taking place, as explained by Thomas Kuhn in the text entitled “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”: the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm.
Attempt at scientific proof of the existence of the Island of Atlantis, which coincides with the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, from this moment called the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block or Atlantis .
To evaluate a scientific theory, one must consider several criteria, such as coherence, falsifiability, predictability, and verifiability. In this text, starting from version 138, I will try to respect these scientific criteria, studying them when necessary to understand them better. I am not yet able to write a scientific paper.
To evaluate the credibility of a source, you need to consider several factors, such as the author’s authority, the quality of the information, the sources cited, the method used, and the consensus of the scientific community. If a source does not meet these criteria, it is likely unreliable or false.
Scientific reinterpretation of the tale of the Garden of Hesperides
The Garden of the Hesperides gave golden fruits , and was located at the extreme borders of the known earth; an analogy with the apparently mythological story of the Hesperides has been detected in Sardinian toponymy: in fact, there is a place called Fruttidoro, located in the town of Capoterra, in Sardinia . Capoterra, from the Sardinian Caputerra, then in Latin “Caput Terrae”, is the “cape of the Earth”, or the extreme edge known in antiquity (Mesolithic/early Neolithic, around 11,600 years ago, to have an approximate but useful date for understanding), while the current location of Fruttidoro in Capoterra would be the legendary Garden of the Hesperides. This new discovery has not yet been counter-validated by scholars, nor have stratigraphies been carried out for the relative counter-verification. The Garden of the Hesperides was located in the Atlantic Ocean, which as explained on the website atlantisfound.it , was the Mesolithic name of the sea that surrounded the island, then a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean emerged land. The Hesperides Islands must therefore have been the archaic names with which Sardinia and Corsica were defined in the millennia following the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Hesperidum Insulae, “The Islands of the Evening”, because at sunset, when the Greeks looked towards the West, sailing in that direction from their most remote position, which was most likely the island of Ischia, they saw 2 distant islands, which today are known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica, and which are plateaus of emerged land of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The linguist and glottologist Massimo Pittau analyzed the location of the Garden of the Hesperides, placing it presumably in Sardinia and pointing out that it was in any case a legend; I, however, in my bold ignorance, go further and propose that it is not a legend, but a place that really existed located in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, as stated in other terms by the myth. Obviously, a serious scholar should study all the toponymy of Capoterra and nearby locations, to verify the oldest names that can be traced back to and if in the past they were called by other names. In any case, a good analysis based on satellite archaeology would be appropriate, to highlight very ancient settlements, Mesolithic or Neolithic, present on the site or UNDER the site (because with great probability they will now be submerged by the layers superimposed over the millennia).Following these interpretations, we can analyze other aspects of mythology: Thetis was a Sardinian. Peleus married a Sardinian, but the Greeks called them “sea nymphs”. The garden of the Hesperides is in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, in Sardinia, between the Atlas Mountains, or the Sulcis Mountains, and the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean, or the current Mediterranean Sea.
Why were they called the Atlas Mountains in ancient times? Because Sulcis was the Capital of Atlantis, but above all because Poseidon initially surrounded the center of Sulcis by enclosing it with circles of water and land, to protect Cleito, when navigation did not yet exist, in an era that is currently undefined. Poseidon was an ancient Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean ruler, he was not a God. We all know that the Pharaoh was seen as a God, but that in reality he was a man is known to everyone. This concept is called “euhemerism”. The first son of Poseidon and Cleito, Atlas, the first of 5 pairs of twins (10 brothers in total) took the official title of First King of Atlantis, and he took possession of Sulcis in present-day Sardinia. This is the reason why in ancient times they called the volcanic mountains of Sulcis the Atlas Mountains. So, when in ancient times it was stated that the Garden of the Hesperides was located between the “Atlas Mountains” and the Atlantic Ocean (Paleolithic, i.e. the Mediterranean Sea), the geographical location is perfect and correct: Frutti d’Oro di Capoterra is in fact located between the Atlas Mountains and the Mediterranean, exactly where some ancient historians had placed it .
The mess came later, when the Atlantic Ocean was moved, as probably already reported before me by Professor Sergio Frau (2002), who questioned the original position of the Pillars of Hercules by hypothesizing that it was between Sicily and Tunisia, from which it can be correctly deduced that the Atlantic Ocean was approximately the Sea of Sardinia. Tethys was the eponym of the Sardinian city still called Tethys today. The wild boar hunt therefore took place in Sardinia: this custom still exists. All the mythological background returns to its place, and everything that previously seemed like fables takes on a plausible and more realistic contour.
The Hesperides Islands and the Garden of the Hesperides
The Garden of the Hesperides gave golden fruits, and was located at the extreme borders of the known earth; an analogy with the apparently mythological story of the Hesperides has been detected in Sardinian toponymy: in fact, there is a place called Fruttidoro, located in the town of Capoterra, in Sardinia. Capoterra, from the Sardinian Caputerra, then in Latin “Caput Terrae”, is the “cape of the Earth”, or the extreme edge known in antiquity (Mesolithic/early Neolithic, around 11,600 years ago, to have an approximate but useful date for understanding), while the current location of Fruttidoro in Capoterra would be the legendary Garden of the Hesperides. This new discovery has not yet been counter-validated by scholars, nor have stratigraphies been carried out for the relative counter-verification. The Garden of the Hesperides was located in the Atlantic Ocean, which as explained on the website atlantisfound.it , was the Mesolithic name of the sea that surrounded the island, then a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean emerged land. The Hesperides Islands must therefore have been the archaic names with which Sardinia and Corsica were defined in the millennia following the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Hesperidum Insulae, “The Islands of the Evening”, because at sunset, when the Greeks looked towards the West, sailing in that direction from their most remote position, which was most likely the island of Ischia, they saw 2 distant islands, which today are known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica, and which are plateaus of emerged land of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The linguist and glottologist Massimo Pittau analyzed the location of the Garden of the Hesperides, placing it presumably in Sardinia and pointing out that it was in any case a legend; I, however, in my bold ignorance, go further and propose that it is not a legend, but a place that really existed located in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, as stated in other terms by the myth. Obviously, a serious scholar should study all the toponymy of Capoterra and nearby locations, to verify the oldest names that can be traced back to and if in the past they were called by other names. In any case, a good analysis based on satellite archaeology would be appropriate, to highlight very ancient settlements, Mesolithic or Neolithic, present on the site or UNDER the site (because with great probability they will now be submerged by the layers superimposed over the millennia).
ATLANTIS AS A HIGHLY DEVELOPED AND TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED CIVILIZATION.
When Plato describes the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block as a highly developed and technologically advanced civilization, this sentence must be read in the context in which the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis existed, that is, before its partial submersion in 9600 BC, or about eleven thousand six hundred years ago. Many readers of Plato, however, when they read the sentence “highly developed and technologically advanced”, believe that Plato is referring to us who live in 2023 AD, so they believe that when we talk about a technologically advanced population, this must have laser beams, teleportation, supercomputers equipped with super artificial intelligences… This mistake is made not only by many readers, but also by directors and writers; for example, the Disney cartoon film entitled Atlantis – The Lost Empire, shows that the inhabitants of Atlantis would have technologies such as flying motorcycles, with a system that appears to be anti-gravity. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean theory instead states that the Atlantean population, which populated in particular the paleocoasts of the Sardinian-Corsican block, today called by science by the name of “submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental platform”, was technologically advanced compared to the other populations of its time, that is, those contemporary to it and who lived in the period prior to 11,600 (eleven thousand six hundred) years ago.
To give a clear example: on the Wikipedia page Carro_(transport), we read that “The first cart confirmed in Mesopotamian documents dates back to 3000 BC , found in a bas-relief in Ur called the feline chariot , in which the chariot appeared made up of solid wheels with three sectors, with an axle and wheel joined together and a pin fixed to a frame, which in the case of hearses, reached the size of 50 cm by 65 cm”. But in Plato’s descriptions, Atlantis had war chariots even before its submergence in 9600 BC. According to my Sardinian-Corsican Atlantidean theory, this is what “technologically advanced” means. The Atlanteans were experts in canalization, in creating irrigation canals. This was advanced technology, compared to many other peoples, according to Plato, in 9600 BC and even before the sinking.
The Mass Media, unfortunately, and many occultists who have dealt with the theme of Atlantis, have unfortunately contributed to insert chaotic and confusing elements in the search for the submerged island, so that even today many people expect that in Atlantis there are futuristic technologies even for us today, but this is simply a logical error of reasoning.
ANALYSIS OF THEORIES ABOUT ATLANTIS THAT CONTRADICTE MY THEORY
I cannot ignore the other interpretations of Plato and the historical and geographical evidence that contradict my hypothesis: so in this section I will deal with this, that is, analyzing the individual theories one by one and trying to show the weak and strong points of each by rereading them in the light of my peculiar interpretation. To do this, I will use the texts of the various authors and I will try to dismantle them piece by piece. This is not what I would like to do in life, but unfortunately I am forced to do it because I want to speed up the process of recognizing my potential discoveries.
In the Temple of Edfu the Sardinian-Corsica-Atlantean island, currently half-submerged, is also called “The Primordial Island”, “Island of the Egg”, “Island of Trampling”, “Island of Combat”, “Island of Peace”; it is located in the “Eternal Lake” (the Eternal Lake is today called the Mediterranean Sea). The texts of the Timaeus and the Critias state things very similar to those written in hieroglyphics in the Temple of Edfu, using different words and circumlocutions. Combining this information together, it is possible to obtain new information on the currently half-submerged Sardinian-Corsica-Atlantean geological block.
Atlantis is the name given by the Egyptians to the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block when it was an emerged land, before its submersion/sinking around 9600 BC . It is actually semi-submerged, as the Platonic historical story about Atlantis narrates, but two plateaus remained above the water, and our civilization gave them the name of “Sardinia” and “Corsica” . The “elephant species” was present there, as Plato says, in fact there was the Mammuthus Lamarmorae .
The currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis was the largest of all the islands; it was located in the center of the current Mediterranean, which was then called the Sea of Atlantis, or the Atlantic Ocean, called in later times by many names, among which the Egyptians will use “The Great Green”, “The Eternal Lake” to name a few. It was very rich in forests, and this is still true and valid. The climate was particularly mild, and this is still true today: in fact, the sea has functions similar to those of a capacitor in an electrical circuit: it dampens the hot climate by partially absorbing it, and mitigates cold climates by releasing the heat accumulated previously. It was rich in minerals, and this is still true today, so we can imagine what the Sardinian-Corsican block must have been like over 11,600 years ago. It was ancient for the ancients, and we have an infinite amount of evidence of this: geology teaches us that the Sardinian rocks are over half a billion years old. Tower builders lived there, and we know this for sure, so much so that one era has even been called “Nuragic”, and studied quite extensively, so much so as to provide a lot of valid scientific documentation. It must have been located beyond the Pillars of Hercules, and this also seems to be correct, after the findings I made in El Haouaria Bank and Birsa Bank.
How do you explain the fact that Plato describes Atlantis as a circular island with a navigable canal in the center and a series of concentric rings of land and water, while the Sardinian-Corsican block has an irregular shape and does not present these characteristics? Because the ringed description does not concern the entire Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean block, but only the capital of Atlantis, the current Sulcis. As I previously explained, in Sulcis there is an almost circular structure, of the dimensions indicated by Plato, but after eleven thousand six hundred years of rain, flooding, tectonic movements caused by the graben-horst structure of Sulcis, and tectonic movements caused by the Sinkholes structure of Sulcis, have meant that these portions of land, which present the very ancient structures reported by Plato, such as the Temple of Poseidon, have moved from their original position. Therefore, a serious and rigorous stratigraphic investigation is needed. I am neither an archaeologist, nor a stratigrapher, nor a geologist, so I am not able to personally deal with this analysis. However, I believe that I have provided a potentially important contribution to research with all this information.
There is evidence of contact between the Egyptians and the inhabitants of the Atlantean plateau called Sardinia: in fact, there are at least 300 archaeological finds that scholars define as “Egyptianizing” . In recent days, an agreement has been signed by the Director Luana Toniolo and the Director of the foundation museum of Egyptian antiquities of Turin, Christian Greco, for the study and analysis of these finds.
POSSIBILITY OF THE DISCOVERY OF ANCIENT ATHENS FROM 9600 BC
On the submerged carbonate continental shelf Iblea Sicily-Malta , flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment , Dr. Luigi Usai (the writer) found a perfectly rectangular structure on what appear to be the Mesolithic paleocoasts of eastern Sicily currently submerged. Upon closer inspection, it was possible to ascertain the presence of structures with perfectly geometric shapes, which appear to be of anthropic nature. Further studies are necessary for understanding; however, it is already possible to consult the online images of this possible archaeological find.
Video of the potential discovery:
HYPOTHESIS ON THE FIRST ATHENS SUBMERGED AROUND 9600 BC TOGETHER WITH ATLANTIS
If what Plato said about Atlantis is indeed a historical event, as stated in Timaeus and Critias, then one might hypothesize that this is the first Athens, submerged in 9600 BC. If this turns out to be true, everything Plato said has an objective basis in the real world. Of course, it would be very strange for the First Athens to be located in Sicily. The important point to underline is that there seems to be a lot of objective evidence: bathymetry is a Science. Therefore, bathymetric maps are also part of the tools that can be used by the scientific method. Some scholars have pointed out that sometimes “artifacts” appear on the seabed, caused by bad data acquisition. However, after about 20 years in the IT sector, I have enough knowledge to establish that the possibility that these are erroneous artifacts is extremely low, otherwise I should have found rectangles in other parts of the world, which has never happened, not even when exploring the seabeds of the entire world for about two consecutive years. The submerged rectangle is also present in a point that appears to be a Mesolithic paleocoast, so it is even more likely that it is a truly existing anthropogenic structure. Furthermore, in the last year the resolution has changed and improved. If it were an artefact, the new surveys should have erased the error and overwritten it with the correct data, but this has not happened so far.
TOPONYMY AND ONOMASTICS
In the Sardinian-Corsican block, the toponymy, very useful to archaeologists, clearly recalls the sources of hot and cold water placed according to the Platonic story on the island of Atlantis by Poseidon: there are some hamlets of towns called “ Acquacadda ” ( Hot Water, in the Sardinian Campidanese language ), S’acqua callenti de basciu (The Hot Water below, in Sardinian Campidanese) and S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (The Hot Water above, in the Sardinian Campidanese dialect), while in the nearby town of Siliqua the cold water source of Zinnigas is still present today; in Siliqua the “ Castello d’Acquafredda ” is all that remains of the medieval citadel of Acquafredda . In short, even the toponymy recalls the Platonic myth. Furthermore, Solon heard the story in the Egyptian city of Sais , and Sais is also the name of a geographical hamlet near Narcao: the locality of Is Sais inferiore and Is Sais superiore di Narcao (SU), in Sulcis in present-day Sardinia; it is also a Sardinian surname . The toponymy is apparently correct, and precisely in the same geographical points (Sulcis, in present-day Sardinia) where the toponymy recalls the sources placed by Poseidon. And curiously, always in Sulcis, there is a locality called Piscinas … another toponymy that recalls the theme of water or flooding. While in relation to the Egyptian toponymy, we find a locality called ” Terresoli ” (Land of the Sun, in the Sardinian Campidanese dialect) which reminds us very closely of Heliopolis (City of the Sun). Since Sulcis “s’esti furriau”, they called a hamlet ” Furriadroxiu “; since many people died or were seriously injured, they called it “ Spitiddatroxiu ”. In Sardinia we have Olbia , and Olbia also exists in ancient Egypt . At this point it is still difficult to prove, but the town of Sinnai in Sardinia could be discovered to be related to Sinai in Egypt: this statement is yet to be proven, but it no longer seems to be a coincidence : in-depth studies in the sector are needed. Carnac in France is famous for its megaliths, and Karnak in Egypt is equally famous. The name of the city is the same, but the phonetics is expressed with different consonant values, where K and C have the same semantic meaning, but different spelling.
We have seen the surname Sais , but the surname Usai is also interesting: in Bologna there is the Usai Mummy , which demonstrates the contacts between the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean population and ancient Egypt. In fact, Usai is an exclusively Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean surname: throughout the world, anyone named Usai is of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origins . So we have the presence of Sardinian-Corsican surnames in Ancient Egypt, and this should make us think. Furthermore, in the Necropolis of Montessu in Santadi , in Sulcis, an engraving of an Egyptian boat was found. This, further, confirms the relationships between Egypt and the Sulcis of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block . Uras is a Sardinian surname and a Sardinian city . Together with the Usai Mummy, in Bologna, there are rooms with small bronzes, and all Sardinians are familiar with the Nuragic bronzes . Abis is a Sardinian surname, Abis is a toponym of ancient Egypt. Olbia is a Sardinian city, Olbia is a city of Egypt. Uras is a Sardinian surname, Uras is a Sardinian location, and contains the theme of “Uranus”, which could be related to Poseidon. Toponymy and Onomastics, therefore, confirm the Platonic myth and also the relationships with the Egyptians. Egyptian finds are also found in other places in Sardinia, but here, for the moment, we will remain focused on the Atlantean theme.
3207 Sardinian toponyms begin with Funt (“funti” or “funtana” in Sardinian means “fountain” in Italian).
Sardinian surnames that are also names of countries, cities and geographical locations. Before reading this article, it is a good idea to study the excellent article on the page: https://www.inliberta.it/piu-antichi-cognomi-sardi/
which allows a broad view of Sardinian surnames and which may suggest a Paleolithic or Neolithic origin of these surnames.
The island of Atlantis is described as “rich in water ”. I thought, point-blank, to look for the Sardinian toponyms that contain the word Funt (in Sardinian a “Source” can be called “Funtana”).
There are 3 text entry fields: Toponym, Municipality and Type.
In the Toponym section I inserted the letters Funt, in order to obtain all the words that begin in this way; usually they are words like Funti or Funtana, meaning source, in Campidanese Sardinian.
You get 3207 toponyms in this way, without doing any other research. I would say that 3207 toponyms, 11,000 years after the sinking of Atlantis, can already be a good guarantee of the truthfulness of what Plato stated in Timaeus and Critias, about the fact that the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian block was “rich in water”: Sassari, Thatari and Serramanna, 3 other toponyms, mean “rich in water” (see the works of Professor Salvatore Dedola in this regard).
In the Sardinian-Corsican block, the toponymy, very useful to archaeologists, clearly recalls the sources of hot and cold water placed according to the Platonic story on the island of Atlantis by Poseidon: there are some hamlets of towns called “ Acquacadda ” ( Hot Water, in the Sardinian Campidanese language ), S’acqua callenti de basciu (The Hot Water below, in Sardinian Campidanese) and S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (The Hot Water above, in the Sardinian Campidanese dialect), while in the nearby town of Siliqua the cold water source of Zinnigas is still present today; in Siliqua the “ Castle of Acquafredda ”. In short, even the toponymy recalls the Platonic myth. Furthermore, Solon heard the story in the Egyptian city of Sais , and Sais is a Sardinian surname, and Sardinia is an emerged plateau of the submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block, so everything still fits perfectly. Sais , besides being a surname belonging to the Sardinian-Corsican territory, is also the name of a geographical hamlet near Narcao: the locality of Is Sais inferiore and Is Sais superiore di Narcao (SU), in Sulcis in present-day Sardinia . The toponymy is presented in an apparently correct manner, and precisely in the same geographical points (Sulcis, in present-day Sardinia) where the toponymy recalls the sources placed by Poseidon. And curiously, still in Sulcis, there is a locality called Piscinas (also understood in Italian)… another toponymy that recalls the theme of water or flooding. While in relation to Egyptian toponymy, we find a locality called “ Terresoli ” (Land of the Sun, in the Sardinian Campidanese dialect) that reminds us very closely of Heliopolis (City of the Sun). Since Sulcis “s’esti furriau”, they called a hamlet “ Furriadroxiu “; since many people died or were seriously injured, they called it “ Spistiddatroxiu “. Near Barbusi, near Carbonia in Sardinia, there is Acqua Callentis (hot water in Sardinian) and Caput Acquas. Furthermore, there is a hamlet called Su Peppi Mereu and there are Egyptian pharaohs called Pepi I and Pepi II (in Sardinian Pepi is the diminutive of Giuseppe) .
Mandas is a Sardinian surname and a Sardinian place. Nora is a Sardinian place and Nora is a female name . Lidia is a place and Lidia is a female name ( Lydia (endonym: Śfard; in Greek: Λυδία; in Assyrian: Luddu; in Hebrew: Lûdîm) is an ancient historical region, that is, a place) further confirmation of my statements: the city of Sardi or Sardis or Sardes (in Lydian 𐤳𐤱𐤠𐤭𐤣 , transliterated Sfard ; ancient Greek Σάρδεις , transliterated Sárdeis ; ancient Persian Sparda ) was an ancient city of Asia Minor (now Turkey ) that became the capital of the kingdom of Lydia in the 7th century BC I repeat: the city of Sardi became the capital of Lydia. Solinas is a Sardinian surname and a place: Spiaggia Is Solinas. Solanas is a Sardinian place and a surname, this time Spanish, probably indicating Sardinian-Corsican migrations to Spain in ancient times. Tunis is a Sardinian surname and is a place ( Tunis, in Tunisia ). Zara is a Sardinian surname and is a place ( Zara in Croatia ). Olianas is a Sardinian surname and Oliena is a Sardinian place, which in Sardinian is called Oliana . Ruggiu is a Sardinian surname and Monte Ruggiu is a place. Scano is a Sardinian surname, Scano Montiferru is a place. Pirastru is a Sardinian surname, Porto Pirastru is a place. Mattana is a Sardinian surname , Mattan I and Mattan II are Phoenician rulers. Milia is a Sardinian surname and El Milia is a place in Algeria and Miliana is a place in Algeria. Iunius Silanus is a surname and Silanus is a Sardinian place still existing; there is also a strange similarity between the etymology of Silanus (a Sardinian town whose etymology means: wooded, of the woods) and the mythological figure of Silenus (taken from Wikipedia –> I Sileni (also Silenoi) are figures of Greek mythology, minor deities of the woods, of a wild and lascivious nature –> they were probably the Sardinians who inhabited Silanus, from which they took their name). Siddi is a Sardinian surname and Siddi is a place in Sardinia. Murgia is a Sardinian surname and “Le Murge” is an Apulian-Lucanian sub-region . Sanna is a Sardinian surname and Sannio is an ancient historical place and the Samnites were the people who inhabited it: this could however be a coincidence. However, all these strange “coincidences” must lead to new analyses, to rethink the past and to try to motivate these strange dozens and dozens and dozens of coincidences.
Given all these premises, it is not difficult to realize that:
Troia is a surname, Troja is a surname, and Troia is a town in the province of Foggia and Troia is the famous mythological city… at this point one would be led to suppose that Troia was a Sardinian-Corsican city . This hypothesis is also confirmed by the walls of Troia, built in concentric circles; the fact that the Sardinians Ilenses Troes exist and the other name of Troia is Ilio ( Troes-Ilienses are a Sardinian tribe )…
Another anomaly to keep in mind is the presence of: Gonnos fanadiga Gonnos nò Gonnos codina Gonnos tramatza Another toponymic anomaly: the presence of Biddanoa (Bidda noa means, in Sardinian, New City or New Country, Villanuova or Villanova , in the Sardinian language); and the strange insistence of the term translated villanova wherever there is contact with the Sardinian-Corsican culture: the Villanovan Culture is a facies that gave rise to the Etruscans, it takes its name from the town of Villanova; according to my theory, the Villanovans were very ancient Sardinian-Corsican migrations, which is why a small Nuragic bronze was later found on the bottom of Lake Bolsena inside a submerged Villanovan house; in Cagliari the Villanova district, but it could be a coincidence, because if I’m not mistaken the name has medieval origins and I don’t know why it was called that; in Villanova di Guidonia (Rome) there is the Maritime Theatre of Hadrian, known as Villa Adriana: it is built in concentric circles like the capital of Atlantis, right in a place called Villanova; in Sardinia there was a Neapolis, in the area of Oristano, and Neapolis is the name of Naples, and Nea Polis means precisely new city, in the Sardinian Atlantean Corsican style.
Other linguistic oddities: the insistent Sardinian-Corsican use of diphthongs in toponymy:
with the diphthong “ei” : Orosei, Baunei, Bultei, Burcei, Furtei, Gergei, Urzulei, Lanusei, Lei, Musei, Pauli Arbarei, Pèifugas , Costa Rei, San Niccolò Gerrei, Triei, Mara Arbarèi all places that end with the diphthong “ei”;
with the diphthong “ai” : Allai, Paizé, Gairu, Ollollai, Illorai, Lotzorai, Masainas, Olzai, Onifai, Samatzai, Ulassai, Ussassai, La Trinitài and Vignòla , Villagrande Strisaili;
with the diphthong “oi” : Gavoi, Jaròi/Geròni, Loiri Porto San Paolo, Mammoiada;
with the diphthong “au” : Ardauli, Austis, Ballau, Bauladu, Baunei, Giaùni/Jaùni, Lòiri Poltu Santu Pàulu, Paùli, Narcàu, Lu Palàu, Paùli Arbarèi, Pàu, Pàulle, Paùli Gerrèi/Pàùli Xrexèi, Santu Sparàu, Tempio Pausania ,
Gonnos fanadiga, Gonnos nò, Gonnos codina, Gonnos tramatza, all places that contain the suffix Gonnos;
Some of these facts may be coincidences.
Warning: this site contains experimental research by a non-professional, so there may be logical or methodological errors in the research. Scientists will be able to screen out errors from correct information. What matters is the possible useful information that can be derived from it.
Names of cities/towns/hamlets that need to be analyzed more seriously:
Teulada in Sardinia corresponds to Teulada in Spain
Aritzo in Sardinia corresponds to Aritzu in the Basque Country
Monastir in Sardinia corresponds to Monastir in Tunisia
Orani in Sardinia corresponds to Orano in Algeria
Pula in Sardinia corresponds to Pula in the former Yugoslavia
Palau in Sardinia corresponds to Palau , province of Lleida in Spain, and Palau in Micronesia
Sa Baronia in Sardinia corresponds to La Baronia de Rialb , 25747, Province of Lleida, Spain; but it also corresponds to Sa Baronia located in the Sierra de Tramuntana , declared a World Heritage Site, just 25 km from Palma de Mallorca.
Tethys in Sardinia corresponds to the Tethys Sea, the Titan Tethys son of Uranus and Gaia and a Pharaoh called Tethys
Sa Portedda in Sulcis corresponds to La Portella in Catalonia, Spain
to Menfi in Sicily corresponds a second Menfi in Sicily and a Menfi in Egypt
Amarna in Egypt, the modern name of Akhetaton, the city of Akhenaton, corresponds to Amarnas in Algeria
Gadeiros , brother of the Sulcis Atlas and son of Poseidon and Clito, corresponds to Gadir (Cadiz) corresponds to Gadir in Morocco, Agadir in Morocco, Port of Gadir in Pantelleria, Bay of Ghadira in Malta; moreover, now we understand why Plato speaks of the Gadirica region in front of the Pillars of Hercules: probably the Gadirica was the region near the current Villasimius , but this is all to be verified
Cariddi in Sardinia corresponds to Cariddi in Sicily
Pompu corresponds to Pompeii in Italy and Pohnpei in Micronesia
Umbria in Italy corresponds to the Kingdom of Northumbria in England
to Anglona in Sardinia corresponds Anglia and Angleterre , land of the Angles
Gallura corresponds to Gaul , Gallipoli, Wales and the surname Gallus (many are probably just linguistic coincidences; however it is worth investigating further and perhaps scientifically denying these similarities )
Bithinia corresponds to Bithia
Olbia in Sardinia corresponded to Olbia in Egypt , it is mentioned in ancient history books
Algiers corresponds to Alguier (Alghero)
in Bari corresponds Bari Sardo in Sardinia
Meana corresponds to Meana Sardo in Sardinia
Prato corresponds to Prato Sardo in Sardinia
Riola corresponds to Riola Sardo in Sardinia
Neapolis (in Greek: Νεάπολις; in Sardinian: Nabui) or “new city”, was an ancient city in Sardinia corresponds to Neapolis, the ancient name of Naples in Italy
at the location Tempio- Ampurias , Ampurias Beach , corresponds in Spain Empúries , 17130, Province of Girona, Spain, called in Spanish Ampurias .
to the surname Pau , very frequent and perhaps originating from Sulcis, corresponds the French locality Pau ; someone might even go so far as to note that, while in the French language the diphthong “au” is read as “o”, and therefore Pau in French is read as “Pò”, there is an Occitan pronunciation, which as present in Wikipedia under the entry Pau_(France) , is pronounced exactly Pau, as in the Sardinian language , confirming at least partially my statements. It would be interesting to do a study on Occitan, to see if there could be connections with the languages and dialects of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, as also happens with the Corsican, Basque, Sicilian, Romanian and many other languages;
Caria is a Sardinian surname which corresponds to Caria , which was a historical region in western Anatolia;
Solanas is a Sardinian locality and Solanas is both a Sardinian and Spanish surname :
Solanas is a Spanish surname . Notable people with the surname include:
perhaps these are not coincidences. First of all, we need to go back to the first original toponyms, to understand if they have been changed recently or if they are ancient or the original ones. I propose to study these correspondences: that the name has to do with a sort of direct dominion, colonization or relationship of some kind, is still to be officially demonstrated with more robust evidence.
We have seen the surname Sais , the surname Pau , but the surname Usai is also interesting: in Bologna there is the Usai Mummy , which demonstrates the contacts between the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean population and ancient Egypt. In fact, Usai is an exclusively Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean surname: throughout the world, anyone called Usai is of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origins . Uras is a Sardinian surname, Sardinian town and Sumerian deity. Cabras is a Sardinian surname, Cabras is a Sardinian town and in Cabras they found the Giants of Mont’E Prama, and “ cabras” in Sardinian means “goats” , which is a term that probably originated in the Paleolithic or Neolithic, as goats definitely marked the transition from hunters to breeders and farmers. Sinis is a surname and Sinis is a place. Piras is a surname and Piras is a place . With the Usai mummy we have the presence of Sardinian-Corsican surnames in Ancient Egypt, and this should make us think. It is difficult to explain in a few words, I will do it in another context: the Sumerians, the Akkadians and the Babylonians, with a high probability, were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations in times that scientists will now have to recalculate based on new discoveries. It will be difficult and wonderful, having to go back to all the texts and try to figure it out. However, I can give you some insights: there are probably links between the Sardinian surname Cadelanu , Candelanu and Kandalanu , a Neo-Babylonian king; between the town of Sarroch in Sardinia and Dur- Šarrukin of Nineveh; these discoveries open the doors to a new type of approach with the Sumerian and Mesopotamian culture in general. The gods of Sumerian mythology were miners … and Sulcis has the oldest mine in Italy and perhaps in Europe: if it still provides resources now, what must have been like 11,000 years ago? Now: if a scientist had serious intentions, he could, starting from my observations, do further research. In this way, little by little, perhaps it will come out that from the city of Teti in Sardinia came the Pharaoh Teti of the VI dynasty who reigned in Egypt … Perhaps one will realize that two Pharaohs are called Pepi I and Pepi II: but Pepi or Peppi in Sardinia is the diminutive of Giuseppi , that is, Giuseppe (it could be a simple coincidence). Even today in Sardinia people named Giuseppe are nicknamed Pepi to show affection, familiarity and friendship. One might notice that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans often gave the same name to various cities, so we have two places called Menfi in Sicily and we have the ancient Menfi in Egypt … we have Akrotiri in Cyprus and Akrotiri in Santorini ; Gadir (Cadiz) in Spain has the corresponding Porticciolo di Gadir in Pantelleria, and Gadir and Agadir in Morocco , because the names of some villages and port locations are Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans. This would explain why Umbria exists and the Kingdom of Northumbria exists in England. Murgia is a Sardinian surname and “ le Murgie or la Murgia ” is an Italian location.
Doing this kind of research takes time and patience, it is not an easy thing. But I hope I have given you a good starting input, that can make your work easier.
Here are some examples that could open up new research ideas that are totally innovative and, I believe, perhaps never explored before:
Sardinians Maurreddus of Maurreddanìa in Mauretania and in Mauritania;
Sardi Maltamonenses in Malta;
Sardi Galillenses in Galilee; see the article here ; the commentary by Bartolomeo Porcheddu ; it is now known even to archaeologists that on Mount Carmel an entire Sardinian city dating back to at least between the 12th and 11th centuries BC has been discovered and excavated;
Sardi Patuanoenses Campani in Campania;
Sardi Beronicenses seem connected with the Veronicenses then Veronienses, passing through Etruscan Tuscany;
Sardi Ilienses-Troes seem to be the founders of Ilium-Troy , that’s why Ilium, that is the city of Troy, was built using concentric circles. They represented the Sacred Furrows of Sulcis (Sulcus, Sulci, Latin ablative locative in Sulcis, to be translated as “The place of the Furrows” [Drawn by Poseidon around the hill where his wife Clito lived]);
Sardinians from Gallura seem to be connected with Gaul ;
The Sardinian Balares were probably the rulers of the Baleares ( Balearic Islands );
The Sardinians of Laconi possessed Laconia in Greece;
Furthermore, the Sumerian and Mesopotamian religions are filled with Sardinian terms, surnames and names : this fact should make us reflect. Uras, Sardinian surname, name of a Sumerian deity; Kadelanu, Sardinian surname, becomes the name of a Mesopotamian King Kandelanu; Sarroch, name of a town, becomes King Sarrukkin in Mesopotamia; S’iskuru, Sardinian saying, in Mesopotamia is the god Iskur; Samassi, Sardinian town, is the Sumerian god Samas; Uta, Sardinian town, is the god Utu; Sinnai, Sardinian town, is the Mesopotamian god Sin-Nanna; Maybe we should start asking ourselves a thousand questions from new points of view. In my opinion, a total revision of the historical, geographical, geological, commercial, construction sources is now necessary… from my point of view, an immediate and decisive paradigm shift is necessary: the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Paradigm .
Another oddity of Sardinian surnames : they seem to be very ancient and have a deictic function , suffice it to say that some are “Pani” and “Casu”, “bread” and “cheese” ; “Boi” ox ; and the bull was sacred to the Atlanteans. This could also be a line of research: perhaps surnames were born in the Paleolithic or Neolithic in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block? This could explain why many currently existing surnames ideophonically represent concepts: bread, cheese, ox, crow ( Pani, Casu, Boi, Crobu ), with a 1:1 relationship with reality, that is, each surname corresponds to a real existing object.
Isis is the mother of Horus (Horus, Oro) in Egyptian mythology. In Sardinia, in Sulcis, there is the locality Isidoro (Isis + Oro), a terminology that had religious value. With the advent of the Christian religion, in an attempt to convert the Sardinians to the new religion, everything possible was done to bring these terms back to Christianity, so the archaic terminology Isidoro began to be associated with the figure of a saint, Sant’Isidoro. Now this passage can be very clear to the reader’s eyes.
In Sardinia, in fact, very ancient representations of Isis and Horus (Horus) have been found, which archaeologists have generally always attributed to Egyptian culture, reversing the real facts, as I will try to show in all the arguments on this website. Isis and Horus were figures from Sulcis, taught to the Egyptians in Mesolithic and Neolithic times. This would explain the cult of Isis in Spain, Pompeii, Rome… what was the point of worshipping only one deity from the Egyptian Pantheon? Very simple: the goddess was a deity from Sulcis as the capital of Atlantis, and the cult was widespread throughout the Mediterranean; Egypt, however, also preserved many other aspects of the cult taught and handed down by the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, so Isis was only one of the ancient deities. Christianity then did everything in its power to disintegrate and make the old Sardinian-Corsican cults disappear into oblivion.
April 08, 2023, 06:32
A few minutes ago I noticed that French also behaves like Sardinian, at least in one case:
Samzun is a surname, and it is also a place where there is a prehistoric megalithic circle, right on what I hypothesize to be the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean routes that allowed the spread of megalithism along the European coasts in particular. It is necessary to do some research to understand if and which surnames exist in France that are also toponyms.
The cult of the bull remains in the names, yet to be verified, of Gioia Tauro and Taurianova .
The Hesperides Islands and the Garden of the Hesperides
After the semi-submergence of the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian block, only the mountainous areas of the island of Atlantis remained above water, and were interpreted as two islands. But thousands of years had to pass before they were called Sardinia and Corsica. At first they were called the Hesperides Islands, where there was a garden with golden fruits, called the Garden of the Hesperides.
The extreme end of the world was called Caput Terrae, Capoterra in present-day Sardinia.
In Capoterra there was the Garden of the Hesperides, which had golden fruits: it is not clear to the writer whether these golden fruits were lemons, or yellow apples or who knows what other golden-colored fruit. Once again, the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantian toponymy comes to our aid: in Capoterra, in the province of Cagliari, there is a place still called Frutti d’Oro today.
It is difficult to explain in a few words, I will do it in another context: the Sumerians, the Akkadians and the Babylonians , with a very high probability, were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations in times that scientists will now have to recalculate based on new discoveries. It will be difficult and wonderful, having to go back to all the texts and try to figure it out. However, I can give you some insights: there are probably links between the Sardinian surname Cadelanu , Candelanu and Kandalanu, a neo-Babylonian king ; between the town of Sarroch in Sardinia and Dur- Šarrukin of Nineveh; these discoveries open the doors to a new type of approach with the Sumerian and Mesopotamian culture in general. Atlantis was larger than Libya and Asia put together: now, by the reverse procedure, we can deduce the size of these two geographical realities in about 9600 BC. The people who advanced boldly and wanted to conquer all the peoples who lived beyond the Pillars of Hercules, therefore, were the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans who inhabited the Sardinian-Corsican geological block when it was still emerged land, before the submersion in about 9600 BC. The whole of Sulcis (Sulcis is a geographical area of lower Sardinia, west of Cagliari) is very rich in Atlantean toponymy: Acquacadda , Acquafredda (a city that disappeared in the Middle Ages), Castello di Acquafredda , S’Acqua Callenti de Susu , S’Acqua Callenti de Baxiu , Acqua Callentis (another hamlet that means Hot Water ), over three thousand two hundred Sardinian toponyms just by looking for the portion of the word “funt” (“funti” or “fonti” means “source” in at least one of the variants of Sardinian). It is possible to counter-verify my statements with Google Maps and with the Sardinian database of regional toponyms, as well as in the ways you deem appropriate.
Plato in fact narrates that the Island of Atlantis was rich in water. And in fact the world-famous Sardinian linguist Salvatore Dedola (a super genius that you absolutely must study in depth, together with Bartolomeo Porcheddu, another extraordinary scholar ) shows that Sassari, Thatari (Sardinian name of Sassari) and Serramanna, to give just one example, mean “Rich in Water”. The toponymy and onomastics confirm the Platonic myth. It will be necessary to open sector studies to provide new information to that collected and demonstrated so far, and it is necessary that they are done by professionals in the sector.
SARDINIAN ODDITIES ATLANTIDE COURSE
Regarding the Gadirica area, it is possible that it was not the name of Gadir (Cadiz), but of a homonymous geographical area of the Sardinian-Corsican block, now submerged. Why would it have the same name as Gadir? For the same reason that Teulada in Sardinia has the equivalent Teulada in Spain ; Pula has a Pula in Dalmatia ; Aritzo in Sardinia corresponds to Aritzu in Spain ; Monastir in Sardinia corresponds to Monastir in Tunisia , Alguier (Alghero) corresponds to Algiers in Algeria , the Su Vaticanu fraction of Santadi corresponds to the Vatican in Rome , Pompu in Sardinia corresponds to Pompei , Bari corresponds to Bari Sardo , and I could go on, but I would risk boring you. For this reason, Gadir of the Gadirica, in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block would correspond to Gadir (i.e. Cadiz) .
PLATONIC MEASUREMENTS
Taking the major diagonal that cuts the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, we obtain that it measures approximately 555 Kilometers; this measurement appears, calculated in stadia, in the measurements provided by Critias to describe the island. If we exclude “the range of mountains that fall directly into the sea” (i.e. the mountains now present in Corsica and the right side of Sardinia such as Gennargentu), measuring the rectangular perimeter of the remaining territory currently semi-submerged, it is greater than 10,000 stadia exactly as stated by Plato. It is therefore possible that the Scientific Community will proceed with independent measurements to verify the truthfulness of these statements.
TIMEO DOES NOT JUST TALK ABOUT ASTRONOMY, BUT ALSO ABOUT GEOLOGY
To summarize for clarity: the priests of the city of Sais in Egypt were trying, in their own way, to explain to Solon a geological event of submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block in the center of the Mediterranean, a sea that in 9600 BC was called the Atlantic Ocean or Atlantic Sea (it took its name from the island of Atlantis, the largest of all before it ended up semi-submerged). Atlantis was therefore also larger than Sicily, which now, after its sinking, turns out to be the largest island, and not Sardinia.
Therefore the period of the sinking would be around, approximately, 9600 BC, differently from the hypothesis of the Sardinian-Nuragic Atlantis, which is clearly incorrect also for the reasons listed elsewhere by Sardinian archaeologists .
Stratigraphic analyses must go deep into the ground to find remains from around 11,600 years ago, in order to find the remains of the “capital” of Atlantis or its population, and it is also very clear why no bodies of deceased Atlanteans are found in the Nuragic layers.
PILLARS OF HERCULES IN THE SICILY CHANNEL: NEW ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
Frau (2002), whom I thank wholeheartedly for her extraordinary contributions to the discipline, places the Pillars of Hercules between Sicily and Tunisia . In fact, there is a possibility that these have been found. In fact, the scientific community throughout the world is in the process of analyzing the very recent discovery of what appear to be structures of an anthropic nature located right in the Channel of Sicily, found through bathymetric analysis of the European Union’s Emodnet System , in Birsa Bank and El Haouaria Bank , exactly between Sicily and Tunisia, and a short distance from Pantelleria. A second anomalous discovery from a bathymetric point of view has been made, of a structure with an apparently rectangular shape in the Sicily-Malta continental carbonate platform , flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment (for geologists) .
The scientific world has not yet expressed its opinion on the matter ; it is not even known whether studies are being conducted on the matter. Five computerized and independent bathymetric systems have been used, programmed and managed autonomously, which have returned the same results, which suggests that these structures really exist on the seabed. The cost of an expedition, however, is prohibitive for a single individual, and it will be necessary to wait for the intervention of third parties.
THE MUD AROUND THE ISLAND OF ATLANTIS
Why was everything around the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island full of mud that prevented navigation ? Because the sea currents, after the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, began to tear away layers of land that emerged from the surface as Sardinia does now, creating over the millennia what geologists today call the Sardinian-Corsican “continental platform” . As the sea currents “washed” away layers of land, destroying all the inhabited centers and structures that had been built before 9600 BC on the Sardinian-Corsican coastal strips, the water was clouded by muddy materials, and this is clear and obvious to thought and reflection.
GENETICS
In Atlantis “lived the oldest old people”, and we all know about the Sardinian-Corsican centenarians , to the point that the Sardinian genetic code has not only been and is studied all over the world, but has even been stolen (see the theft of 25,000 test tubes with 17 suspects, following the theft of the Sardinian DNA test tubes which, according to the press, occurred at the Genos Park in Perdasdefogu in August 2016). That the Sardinian-Corsican block is ancient for the ancients is obvious to cultured scholars: it is enough to mention the discovery of a fragment of the carapace of Arthropleura armata from the Carboniferous of Iglesias (PAS – EA Martel Museum in Carbonia) , but anyone interested can get information from a paleontologist, one above all the extraordinary Daniel Zoboli. It is therefore obvious that the erudite Egyptians were able, from many details, to understand the antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican block , which they called Atlantis .
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
The Temple of Horus at Edfu, Egypt: Reinterpretation of the Texts Based on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Paradigm
In Egypt, in the city of Edfu , there is a temple entirely covered in hieroglyphics. There are various translations, difficult to make also because of the content: in fact, the majority of these texts tell of the origin of civilization, of the origin of the world .
The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm helps in deciphering these texts, contributing to clarify the meaning of a good part of them; to understand better, however, it is necessary to provide the reader with some basic information that will then allow him to understand almost the entire text.
In the Temple of Edfu, the Mediterranean Sea is called “The Eternal Lake”, “The Eternal Lake” or “The primordial waters” . In the Eternal Lake there was an Island that lay in the primordial waters, namely the Sardinian-Corsican block when this was a single emerged land, over 11,600 years ago, during the Pleistocene. This same island is called by Plato, in the dialogues entitled Timaeus and Critias, with the name of Atlantis. The historical account is the same, but some different terms are used to describe the same things. By combining the texts of Timaeus and Critias with the information carved in the Temple of Edfu, it is possible to obtain further information useful for understanding the prehistoric past of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean island and its relations with the ancient Egyptian world.
Since I did not know these texts, I will slowly begin to try to make them translatable by relying on all the information that has been provided to us by the Platonic texts and by new scientific discoveries of various nature: archaeological, genetic, geographical, linguistic etc. For the analysis of hieroglyphic writing, I will use the typewriter available online here: https://discoveringegypt.com/egyptian-hieroglyphic-writing/hieroglyphic-typewriter/
I will try to rewrite the Edfu texts trying to make them clearer for a contemporary citizen, replacing all the ancient terms with modern ones. For example, instead of “Eternal Lake” I will write “Mediterranean Sea”, instead of “Egg Island” I will write “semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantic island”, and so on.
The primordial world of the Gods is an island (in hieroglyphic iw) partly covered by reeds, which lay in the darkness of the primordial waters of the Mediterranean, occupied by Mesolithic inhabitants whose DNA has been analysed in two out of three individuals from the rock shelter of Su Carroppu, in present-day Sardinia.
This population was considered divine, it is not yet clear why. Perhaps because they were culturally much more advanced than the rest of the world population. They probably already knew a bit of metallurgy in the Mesolithic (I still have to prove it) and this was perceived by other peoples as a divine characteristic. In fact, Nekhbet and other deities have the symbol of metallurgy on their paws, which in my opinion is also the symbol that the Egyptians used to indicate Sulcis or the origin from mining Sulcis. Among the creator gods, Ptah seems to have a very important role. Now, at the moment it is not yet clear whether this has to do with Poseidon. At the moment it is still difficult to understand, I am forced to study Egyptology to try to understand the possible connections. Some information can be found in the Shabaka Stone. The texts on creation are of the Heliopolitan or Hermopolitan type, from the respective cities in which the texts were found engraved on the walls. The first Egyptian pharaohs were probably inhabitants of the Sardinian-Corsican block, or what for the Egyptians was the Primordial Island or Egg Island. The priest who speaks to Solon in Timaeus and Critias, in fact, points out that at the beginning the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans had arrogantly attempted to invade the entire Mediterranean. Gobekli Tepe could be a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean colony before the submersion. The partial submersion of the island and the death of millions of inhabitants, and the destruction of many cities and works of art must have been a tremendous trauma for the Sardinian-Corsican colonists in Turkey. And in fact at Gobekli Tepe there are engravings that seem to indicate the terrible misfortune that occurred around 9600 BC, when the island was partially submerged in a devastating way, “in the short span of a day and a night of terrible earthquakes and floods”.
The myth continues: first there is Atum, the god who hovers over the waters; then the pyramid-shaped hill appears from which the sun originated, and Atum climbed it. Atum was bisexual; he cried, and the tears became men and women. He gave birth, and Geb, the earth, male and lying down, and Nut, a woman clinging to him, were born. Atum had them separated by the air, Shu.
Atum hovering over the waters, is then taken up again by the Bible: “And the spirit hovered over the waters”, in Genesis, before the creation. Geb and Nut had children: Isis, Osiris, Seth and Nephtys.
This is the myth of Heliopolis.
The Egyptian Creation Hermopolitana instead predicts that the sun was born from a mound. And in fact, around the world, there was at least one civilization that built a disproportionate amount of mounds. Even in the United States. This should at least make us think. Now, in Sulcis there is a structure made in this way, but I don’t know if it’s just a coincidence.
In short, all Platonic statements, if inserted in the right context, are rational and correctly explainable. However, they require a certain mental humility, a certain “disposition to listen”. Since they are strong statements, which have consequences, they probably require a few months of reflection and meditation, before they can be assimilated and digested correctly. After all, it has been 2600 years (since the time of Solon) that no one has understood what the island of Atlantis was, indeed, it has been claimed almost everywhere that Plato was exaggerating. Regarding the submersion/sinking of the Sardinian-Corsica island of Atlantis , this would be a problem of a geological nature, where I can only speculate. For example, there may be at least three concomitant causes: the Meltwater Pulses , in particular the meltwater pulse 1b, also studied by NASA technicians. Furthermore, the geological settlement movements due to what geology experts call ” slab roll-back “. Furthermore, it has even been hypothesized, but still under verification, that a tectonic fault passes under Sulcis, the same one that passes under Pompeii and Herculaneum, reaches under Sulcis and continues to Gibraltar . In possible support of the theory that Atlantis is the partially submerged Sardinian-Corsican island and its currently submerged continental shelf, we report here some scientific evidence. On February 28, 2017, a study was published in the journal Scientific Reports of the Nature group that presents new archaeogenetic data . These data strengthen the archaeological evidence of the clear cultural discontinuity between the first inhabitants of the island, dating back to about 11 thousand years ago, and the architects of its definitive population that occurred about 3000 years later, with the arrival of the first farmer-breeder colonists. This important discovery is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from the skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia . At the moment, these remains represent the oldest evidence of human presence on the island. Now, from 9600 BC to today, approximately 9600 + 2023 years have passed, or 11623. The evidence cited above is in fact from 11000 years ago.. A study was conducted on the clear cultural discontinuity between the first inhabitants of the island of Sardinia about 11,000 years ago and the architects of its stable and definitive settlement, which occurred about 3,000 years later with the arrival of the first farmer-breeder settlers. The study is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia, which represent the oldest direct evidence of human presence on the island. The study is part of the research project funded by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia on the history of the first Neolithic settlement of the island. The genetic sequences obtained were compared with ancient and modern data and revealed a large difference in the genetic variability of the current population of the island compared to the first humans who frequented it, with most of the genetic variability appearing to have been determined by the migratory flow of populations who introduced the productive economy starting from the earliest Neolithic. The Mesolithic sequences of the Su Carroppu samples belong to the groups called J2b1 and I3, which have very low or low frequencies in Europe. The relevance of the scientific discovery stimulates the intensification of research in the key site of Su Carroppu, already investigated between the years 1960-1970 and currently the subject of systematic excavations directed by the University of Cagliari. Good research to all of you. If anyone is interested, the theory of Atlantis as the Sardinian-Corsican island and all its currently submerged continental shelf, manages to explain other things in a very intuitive way. For example, the Greeks and Romans probably thought that the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block had been a punishment from the gods for the arrogant inhabitants, who “had overbearingly attempted, with one stroke, to invade the lands on this side of the Pillars of Hercules (which at first I thought were located in the current Birsa Bank, an apparently anthropized submarine mountain below the Strait of Sicily, data scientifically verified by Emodnet bathymetries, and at a later time I thought connected to my potential discovery of 苏美邻 in the continental shelf Sicily Malta, flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment). First I tried to clarify the toponymy. Now we can try to clarify the onomastics: the Gods punished the Sardinian-Corsicans, called by the Egyptians “Atlanteans”, according to what is stated in the Platonic texts around 9600 BC, “crushing the Sardinian-Corsican island under their feet, and it sank” (the quotation marks are my hypothesis). And this is easily explained why the Greeks called Sardinia Ichnussa/Ichnusa (footprint) and the Romans called it Sandalia or Sandaliotis (sandal print). Even the name is now very clear: they were Greeks and Romans who mocked Sardinia,which was what remained of the great Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean power, which the Egyptians called “Atlantis” in the story told to Solon, who told it to Dropides, who spoke about it to his grandfather Critias, who spoke about it to his grandson Critias, who told it to Socrates in the Platonic dialogues of Timaeus and Critias. If any reader would like to know the original history of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block before it sank, he is obliged to read Timaeus and Critias, two texts written by the Greek Plato. All the rest of the texts published up to now have done nothing but add entropy, chaos, confusion, in the history of the Sardinian-Corsican block, as people like Cayce or Madame Blavatsky, professional charlatans, used the topic of Atlantis to make money, publishing books full of lies and entertaining the curious, especially after they saw that the book by Ignatius Donnelly entitled ATLANTIS: THE ANTEDILUVIAN WORLD, had an incredible media response worldwide. Cinema and television, then, have introduced a lot of nonsense on the topic of Atlantis, so when talking about this topic many have in mind pieces of films or cartoons or fantasy books that have nothing to do with what Plato said. So: the Greek name Ichnusa, and Latin Sandalia, confirm my hypothesis that the ancients thought that the gods punished the Sardinian-Corsican island by crushing it underfoot. There was no geological science as we know it today. Furthermore:There was no geological science as we know it today. Furthermore:There was no geological science as we know it today. Furthermore:the Wadati-Benioff tectonic fault that passes under Pompeii and Herculaneum, and which destroyed them, is probably the same one that continues under Sulcis in present-day Sardinia and continues until it reaches the present-day Strait of Gibraltar . Since this fault is activated in geological times, the citizens who live in Sulcis are not aware of the seismic activity. When this releases its elastic energy, terrifying disasters occur, such as the opening of the Strait of Gibraltar, the destruction of cities and places such as Pompeii and Herculaneum, or the submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican island. But the submersion is probably also due to another very important cause: the geological settling of the Sardinian-Corsican island following the “slab roll-back” which, as revealed to us by the ancient Egyptian priest, occurred around 9600 BC. The Slab Roll-Back, concomitantly with the tectonic awakening of the fault present under Sulcis and currently unknown to official geology that instead knows of a fault further south that runs along Africa, and perhaps also due to the succession of various Meltwater Pulses post-Wurm glaciation, caused the partial submersion of the island of Sardo Corsa. Now, out of the water, only the tops of the mountains remained, which we now believe to be separate islands, and which our civilization now knows by the names of Sardinia and Corsica. Furthermore, all the toponymy and onomastics present in Sulcis leave a question: why do all these places in Sulcis recall Plato’s story? We can then take up the Platonic text again to try to understand the reason. First of all, if the Pillars of Hercules were located at Birsa Bank, and the Sardinian-Corsican island and its currently submerged continental shelf is really Atlantis, this means that in 9600 BC it was customary to call the current Mediterranean Sea by the name of Atlantic Sea (i.e. sea of the island of Atlantis) or Atlantic Ocean (Ocean of the Sardinian-Corsican island currently submerged, i.e. Atlantis). I have not yet read Frau (2002), so I do not know if he has already published some of my statements, in which case I apologize in advance. Mine are only reflections consequent to the reasoning made in these last two years. Please point out any shortcomings or apparent plagiarisms of mine, thanks in advance. If all this is true, then Poseidon was perhaps a man, and obviously not a deity (because, have you ever met one in person?), and this man fell in love with a teenager whose parents had died, Clito. Plato’s story says that Poseidon surrounded the hill with water channels. Now, Sulcis itself (what a coincidence! Or maybe it’s not a coincidence?) is of volcanic nature, so right in the center of Sulcis there is a hill or mountain, if you like, not too high, and this is visible using satellite systems like Google Maps or Google Earth, which even allows you to tilt the view by pressing the shift key on your computer keyboard. But are these places really as ancient as Plato says or are they very recent places? Easy to verify: right in the center of Sulcis, you can verify that the prehistoric caves IS ZUDDAS exist, and nearby there is ACQUACADDA (Poseidon placed two springs there, one of cold water and one of hot water, and the place is called Acquacadda… but look what an incredible coincidence! Of course I have imagination!) and in the place of Acquacadda very ancient archaeological finds have been found. Now an expert could object that the finds, for example, are only 6000 years old. Exactly: an expert should look for the stratigraphic layers of 9600 BC: only then would it be possible to obtain more detailed information. Instead, currently, groups of children are brought to these places to look. In my opinion this is dangerous but I am not a specialist in stratigraphy, so I have no say in the matter. Also in Sulcis, the Su Benatzu Cave was found, which is an authentic archaeological treasure, which could contribute to research on the topic of “what happened in the millennia after the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean island?” (I have to develop this topic). Furthermore, in support of the theory of the submerged Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis,There is another scientific discovery of marine archaeology: the discovery of a load of 39 orichalcum ingots by the extraordinary Sebastiano Tusa off the coast of Gela, Sicily. Newspaper articles hypothesize that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information on the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located a very short distance away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” that began about 40 million years ago, after the block detached from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a pinch of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future they turned out to be wrong). This is possible to know, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, which has shown that the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have also been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme of the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites at Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated in the Mediterranean also over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomethe discovery of a cargo of 39 orichalcum ingots by the extraordinary Sebastiano Tusa off the coast of Gela, Sicily. Newspaper articles suggest that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information about the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located a very short distance away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” that began about 40 million years ago, after the block detached from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a pinch of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future they turned out to be wrong). This is possible to know, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, which has shown that the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have also been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme of the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites at Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated in the Mediterranean also over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomethe discovery of a cargo of 39 orichalcum ingots by the extraordinary Sebastiano Tusa off the coast of Gela, Sicily. Newspaper articles suggest that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information about the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located a very short distance away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” that began about 40 million years ago, after the block detached from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a pinch of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future they turned out to be wrong). This is possible to know, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, which has shown that the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have also been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme of the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites at Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated in the Mediterranean also over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomeNewspaper articles suggest that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information about the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located a very short distance away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” that began about 40 million years ago, after the block detached from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a pinch of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future they turned out to be wrong). This is possible to know, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, which has shown that the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have also been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme of the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites at Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated in the Mediterranean also over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomeNewspaper articles suggest that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information about the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located a very short distance away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” that began about 40 million years ago, after the block detached from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a pinch of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future they turned out to be wrong). This is possible to know, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, which has shown that the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have also been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme of the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites at Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated in the Mediterranean also over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomeThe antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” that began about 40 million years ago, after the block broke away from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a pinch of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if they turned out to be wrong in the future). This is possible to know, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of paleomagnetic research has been done, which has shown that the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme by the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites to Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated the Mediterranean, even over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (let us remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomeThe antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” that began about 40 million years ago, after the block broke away from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a pinch of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if they turned out to be wrong in the future). This is possible to know, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of paleomagnetic research has been done, which has shown that the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme by the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites to Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated the Mediterranean, even over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (let us remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomewho have shown how the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have also been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so that even these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme by the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites to Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated the Mediterranean, even over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (let us remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomewho have shown how the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Spanish-French coasts. Furthermore, the possible submersion may have also been contributed to by the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Horst Graben, so that even these geological accommodations may have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Horst Graben. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens programme by the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites to Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated the Mediterranean, even over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered across the Ocean (let us remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomein the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, it is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum dictionary. Sardinian Corsican Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomein the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, it is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the current Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, “the dialect” (or should we say the language?) Sicilian (Minimum dictionary. Sardinian Corsican Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others), the Basque language… but apart from a few brilliant scholars, who managed after a lifetime of studies to understand that there are iron similarities, these authors have not becomemainstream because no one imagined the enormous importance of this type of work, which shows in all respects that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean languages spread throughout the Mediterranean. And now, thinking about it carefully, one can begin to intuit that even in the study of languages there has been an inversion: it was believed that Sardinian resembled Spanish and Portuguese because we were “dominated” by them in recent history, while probably the Spanish and Portuguese languages, on the contrary, were imposed by the prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean domination of which, until now, we were not aware. La Nuova Sardegna has dedicated an article on the subject entitled: «That thread that binds the Sardinians with the Basques» by Paolo Curreli in which an exceptional and brilliant linguist has noticed this Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean linguistic heritage, and has made it known to the world with his extraordinary works (from the article: “Hundreds of similar words in the study of Elexpuru Arregi. Many linguistic affinities. Two towns with the same names: Aritzo and Aritzu. But also Uri and Aristanus. Holly in Sardinian is galostiu, in Basque is gorostoi”). But Atlantidologists cannot get to these texts if no one shows their correlation with the theme of Atlantis. There is therefore still a lot of work to do, and this is only the beginning of a new era of studies. The peoples of the Sardinian-Corsican block have therefore influenced in prehistory the evolution of the current languages and dialects and minority languages of part of the Mediterranean and perhaps also of other places. Here is now explained in a very simple and crystal-clear way why Sardinian, Corsican, Sicilian, Basque, Spanish, Portuguese, the Veronese dialect (see for example all the names of asparagus, vegetables etc. which are identical to the Sardinian ones) and who knows what others, are so similar. Now that we have this information, we can once again take up the extraordinary works of Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu and compare ourselves with his statements, which now all appear perfectly correct and all not only explainable, but even understandable and obvious to reason. What Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu states is right and correct (in my eyes it is obvious, there is no need to underline it, but in interviews one sometimes has the impression that his theses are considered “fringe theories”, as if they were pseudo-science, while instead they are demonstration of genius and intuition out of the ordinary). There are various sites that show how various scholars were already noticing the linguistic similarities between languages and dialects of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and other languages and dialects scattered around the Mediterranean in particular, see also this article . Another article that talks about it is this one. In short, serious scholars were now realizing that there was information that we were not aware of, as if there really was an ancient civilization that was missing from the roll call of Ancient History, as Graham Hancock states: this civilization is the one that lived in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged, when this was an island and emerged land: Graham Hancock was therefore right on this point. The impact of this extraordinary discovery creates a sort of shock in the mind of the scholar: in fact, now there is a sense of disorientation, of mistrust. How is it possible that almost no one had ever noticed, if we exclude some brilliant scholars who were even mocked for their statements? How is it possible that Plato was not believed? Even Aristotle himself did not believe him: “He who dreamed of Atlantis also made it disappear”. In conclusion: the old Egyptian priest was telling Solon, around 590 BC, that the Greeks are a young people, because the literates cyclically died from the catastrophes that periodically occur on the planet, and therefore their opinions on the past were like fairy tales, because they had not fixed historical events in written language. The Egyptians instead fixed information on stone, so they had memories of facts grayed by time. And he does not immediately tell him about Atlantis, he tells him about the first Athens, founded around 9600 BC, or 1000 years before the city of Sais in Egypt. At that time, the Greeks accomplished a feat more extraordinary than all: they managed to free all the peoples of the Mediterranean from the invasion of a people, who forcefully tried to invade the whole Mediterranean up to Egypt, Israel and Greece: that is, the Atlanteans, which was the name with which the Egyptian priest describes the inhabitants of the Sardinian-Corsica island currently half-submerged under the Mediterranean. Professor Sergio Frau (2002) realized that “ Sardinia is Atlantis ”, while in reality it is a plateau of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block, and therefore tried to make the Island of Atlas coincide with Sardinia. The problem is that Sardinia is only a subset of Atlantis, therefore the entire Sardinian-Corsican continental platform was missing, which is currently submerged as the Platonic story of Timaeus and Critias says., and the mountainous area north of the island of Atlantis was missing, the emerged part of which is today called “Corsica”. Furthermore, Corsica was ceded to France, making the search even more terribly complicated: in fact, human beings, seeing that one part is Italian and one French, instinctively think that they are two different realities, while instead they are the same submerged island, as world-famous geologists have already confirmed to me that they know. But geologists call this island submerged thousands of years ago with the name of “Sardinian-Corsican geological block”, while the Egyptian priest who told Solon could not use the terms “Sardinia” and “Corsica” which did not yet exist. So the archaeologists, using the scientific method, verified Frau’s statements, and realized that scientifically the accounts did not add up, and they were right. In reality, both Frau and the archaeologists were right: Frau was right, as Sardinia is a subset of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean island. The archaeologists were right, as Sardinia is too small in size to be Atlantis. Furthermore, the dating of the Nuragic was unfortunately incorrect, so it was rightly pointed out by our scientists. What is perplexing, perhaps, is the fact that Atlantis is a submerged island, so: why have the submerged bathymetries never been shown during hundreds of meetings? Why have bathymetry experts not been called? This will probably remain a mystery for the next few years to come. I would be pleased if archaeologists would now express themselves to correct any errors I may have made in expressing my ideas.
If you really want to understand Atlantis: study the geology of the submerged Corsican block of Sardinia. Study the Sardinian dwarf elephants found in Sardinia, called Mammuthus Lamarmorae. When Plato writes that “the elephant species was present” he is talking about this animal, not Indian elephants. To understand Atlantis it is necessary to know the toponymy of Sulcis: “Poseidon placed two springs there, one of cold water and one of hot water”. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans in fact called the Sulcis towns with the following names: Acquafredda (disappeared in the Middle Ages, but a Castello d’Acquafredda remained in Siliqua), Acquacadda, S’acqua callenti de Susu, S’acqua callenti de Baxiu, Piscinas (perhaps following the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block), the Zinnigas source still exists, Is Sais Superiore and Is Sais inferiore (which probably gave the name to the city of Sais in Egypt where they told Solon about Atlantis). Atlantean DNA has already been found and studied by Professor Carlo Lugliè, who has already SCIENTIFICALLY established that this population has a different DNA from that of the Neolithic people who populated Sardinia 3000 three thousand years later. Of course! If there was a catastrophe with the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, it is obvious that they died and a population with a different DNA came later. In Sulcis Poseidon loved caves, evidently. There were the caves of IS Zuddas and Acquacadda (here comes the theme of hot and cold water and therefore of springs). But when he moved north, he probably went to the caves of Alghero, which the Romans still knew as the Caves of Neptune. But Neptune is the Latin name for Poseidon! So the caves of Neptune are the place where this ancient ruler went when he went north, probably to visit his children. Until now, it was thought that Poseidon/Neptune was a myth/legend, instead he was a very ancient ruler, later deified. This fact is called “EVEMERISM”. I suggest all readers take a look, to learn new things. If what I say is true, can I prove it somehow? If a person is intelligent he can deduce it in the following way. The Mammuthus Lamarmorae have been found so far in at least 3 locations: Funtanammari in Gonnesa, in Alghero where there is the Neptune’s Cave, and if I’m not mistaken in Sinis. In Alghero we just said that there are the Neptune’s Caves, so Poseidon went there, and they found the Sardinian dwarf mammoth there. If you analyze the toponymy of Gonnesa, they found another dwarf mammoth of the elephant species in Funtanamari, which means “Fountain by the sea”. But the fountain is a source of water! Here is the theme of the Island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists cannot go so far as to claim that the priest also taught him the language and the various Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean dialects.All of the above are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the currently semi-submerged Corsican Sardinian block. If Atlantis is really the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then some parts of prehistory and History will have to be rewritten from scratch. I leave this work to you. I am not capable of it. For me it has already been a superhuman effort to restore order in the midst of all this mess. I am not interested in fame. In my opinion, Professor Ugas came close when he spoke of the Atlantic coast of Africa, but in my opinion, to understand it better, he could go back to Marco Ciardi’s text, when he speaks of Bailly (Ciardi M., Atlantide Una controversa scientifica da Colombo a Darwin, Carocci editore, Roma, 1° edizioni, novembre 2002, p.92-97): in practice, a part of the Atlantean colony colonized the area indicated by Professor Ugas, while Poseidon became the ruler of the Sardinian-Corsican island now submerged. It is important to note that the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf currently submerged is of immense dimensions! That was an integral part of the island. 11,000 years of erosion by marine currents generated the mud that surrounded the island in Plato’s story, and this mud, settling, cleaned the waters of present-day Sardinia, making them crystalline. Furthermore, there is a very small desert in Sulcis. This desert, with great probability, is artificial. The Timaeus is not only an Astronomy text, but also a Geology text, since it deals with the geological sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Paradigm shift , as explained in Thomas Kuhn’s book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, How the Ideas of Science Change, Einaudi, Turin, 1969: I called it ” The Sardinian-Atlantean Corsican paradigm”. First everyone believed that the orbits were circular, following Eudoxus of Cnidus, Aristotle and Ptolemy in the style of “Ipse Dixit”. Then they realized, after an infinite number of proofs upon proofs, that the orbits are elliptical. Then another paradigm shift occurred: the Bible said that the Earth was at the center of the Universe, and Copernicus said that in the focus of the elliptical orbit there was the Sun. Galileo confirmed, and the Inquisition showed him the instruments of torture. Bruno was burned alive for having supported the scientific truth. In my opinion, today we are again faced with something extraordinary: a new paradigm shift. The island of Atlantis is the Egyptian name for the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block, whose two plateaus that emerge from the water are today known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica. Professor Carlo Lugliè’s studies show that the original Atlantean population, around 11,000 years ago, had a different DNA from the Neolithic people who populated 3,000 years after the catastrophe, and lived mainly by procuring marine resources, and for this reason, the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean settlements were mainly located on the coasts. It is for this reason that the civilization was almost completely wiped out: because the Atlanteans inhabited the paleocoasts and these were submerged “in the short span of a day and a night of terrible earthquakes and floods”. Today science calls the paleocoasts of Atlantis by the name of “Sardinian-Corsican continental platform”. Furthermore, there were 11,000 years of marine currents that eroded and destroyed the coastal structures. Perhaps it is impossible to find any more remains of this civilization. Furthermore, the Andreotti Government has allowed the United States to place a nuclear submarine base in La Maddalena, so the Americans have had at least half a century to make their submarine raids in our waters. And since the Americans are smart, they have placed a “military base” right in Teulada, in Sulcis. But look, what a coincidence… Fantasy archaeology? Dear Superintendencies, where are your submarines for coastal exploration? Where are your thousands of reports on the Sardinian-Corsican seabed? Where are the 3D bathymetries of the seabed? Or maybe they have never been done? And where are the letters to the Ministers, to ask to obtain these things? To obtain funding by explaining their immense importance for the History of Human Civilization? If the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis sank on a date yet to be ascertained, why is breath and energy wasted looking for Atlantis in the Nuragic layers? Once we take for granted the existence of Atlantis with its capital in Sulcis, we have a precise idea of where to look for the structures described by Plato: they must certainly be found in Sulcis.
The dimensions coincide with what Plato stated, even the distance of the capital from the sea, about 8.8 kilometers. Maybe the problem is that the structures could be even 100 meters underground, because at first glance it seems that they were submerged by mountains of earth (this is to be verified, but it is understandable to the eye). Professor Salvatore Dedola is a genius: he noticed the incredible overlap between Sardinian and Babylonian, Sumerian and Akkadian names. “There was a Paleo-Neolithic linguistic coenosis”. It’s all right! The linguistic coenosis was caused by the Atlantean people of the Sardinian-Corsica coasts, that is, the same inhabitants whose DNA has already been analyzed in two out of three individuals of the rock shelter of Su Carroppu. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans migrated across the Mediterranean, giving rise to the Cretan civilization that worshipped the bull just like the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, it would explain the highly evolved culture of the Minoans, as it had already been developed by the Sardinian-Corsicans, the engraving of Poseidon’s trident found on the Palace of Knossos; and it would explain why the Sardinian ingots are found in Crete, in Cyprus, and why in Cyprus there is Akrotiri and there is a second Akrotiri in Santorini, where an advanced civilization lived that even had toilets and pipes… It would explain why on Mount Carmel they found structures from the Nuragic era. It would explain why Atlit-Yam, Pavlopetri, Herakleion/Thonis, Baia and who knows how many others you haven’t even found yet sank… And it would also explain why Atlit-Yam had that name, since perhaps Atlantis was the mother island from which they migrated… Since laws existed in Atlantis (the orichalcum column with the laws engraved on it, on top of which they poured bull’s blood? Sound familiar?), it is not surprising that the descendants then created the Code of Hammurabi, strong in the legal knowledge developed in the previous millennia on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block. Give me the benefit of the doubt for a moment longer. The Romans sought the Damnatio Memoriae for Atlantis. They subjugated them, perhaps stripped the Neptune Caves of the little material that perhaps still remained, but continued to call them by their name. In short, they knew Poseidon/Neptune, for them he was still a historical figure. At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if names related to Atlantis had been banned, and maybe Atlas became Antas, which could clarify the toponym S’Antadi. I haven’t been able to research this and I’m absolutely not capable of doing so. and S’Antadi also appears in Sant’Antonio di Santadi (what an incredible coincidence? Here too the Americans have put a military base… what a strange coincidence… and then in Perdas de Fogu there is another military base, right where they stole the DNA of the inhabitants… what a strange coincidence… but I certainly have some imagination, huh? What do you think?)At the military submarine base in La Maddalena, the Americans brought, listen up… some moles to create tunnels among the largest in the world at the time. Why? Why were the Americans interested in digging huge tunnels in and around La Maddalena? What were they looking for underground? Had they seen some type of metal via satellite (is it possible to do that)? I understand if they bring a missile, if they bring other materials useful for military purposes, but what about moles to dig tunnels? Perhaps it could be interesting to analyze where the military bases are located to extract other useful information. Nuclear submarines for the Mediterranean? Right halfway between Sardinia and Corsica? There were accidents, and newspapers once reported that the submarine was right in Teulada.
To learn more:
the Atlantean name Gadiro, translated into Greek as Eumelus (which recalls Aemilius);
the relations between Karnak and Carnac;
the Gadirica area and the exact location of the Columns: El Haouaria bank?
are all the Gadiri therefore Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean?: starting from this hypothesis, find all the Gadiro mentioned in the official ancient history (one was Cretan; one was a poet; one won at the Olympic games competing with the colts brought to the funeral of Patroclus; find the others);
The presence of Sardinian toponyms that include the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean deities Isis and Horus (Gold): see the toponyms with Isidoro –> there is the possibility that the worship of Isidoro was later Christianized in Sant’Isidoro. Note the presence of the same toponymy in Tenerife, a Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean colony.
Further study to be done, on “mitza” Sardinian meaning –> it means source, spring of water, as in the Platonic myth. It has a similar meaning in the Hebrew language, which is Semitic like Sardinian. I have the impression that the Jewish people in search of the promised land, were nothing more than a portion of Sardinian-Corsican peoples who migrated to Egypt in search of a land that would not sink, unlike the Sardinian-Corsican block that was sinking. And this sinking, known only in remote times, every x thousand years, with partial sinkings, is the same one that Montezuma cited, stating that his ancestors came from the Atlantic Ocean (that is, the Mediterranean before 9600 BC), leaving a perfect land that was sinking.
The Cretans were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations –> Another thought for archaeologists: why have I never heard any scholar make comparisons between the Minotaur and Su Boe Erchitu and Su Boe Muliache ? Why has no one ever pointed out that the Minotaur is a Sardinian-Corsican mythological figure ? Look for images of these characters online and you will understand that the Minotaur is probably nothing more than an ancient Sardinian belief/legend, revived in Crete . The Minoans were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations to Crete; as you know, Evans arbitrarily chose the word “Minoans”. There is also the Androcephalic Bull or bronze statue of Nule , which does nothing but confirm all these statements. Su Boe Erchitu is a legendary creature from Sardinian popular tradition . This should not be confused with Su Boe Muliache, another legendary Sardinian creature . I am not saying I am really right. I am saying: why don’t we try to explore other lines of thought? Why don’t we look for other types of solutions to unsolved problems? I hope that these sentences of mine will be understood for what they are: it is obvious that I am not a specialist; my proposal to scholars is to open up to examining possibilities that until now had been excluded a priori. I invite once again to re-examine the toponymy of Sulcis, because all those names of towns that refer to the Platonic myth are too strange: in Carbonia there is a hamlet called “Acqua Callentis”; in Nuxis “S’acqua callenti de Basciu”, S’Acqua callenti de Susu; the medieval town of Acquafredda disappeared, which left the castle of Acquafredda; the source of Zinnigas; and there are even connections to Egyptian toponymy: Heliopolis (city of the sun) and in Sulcis Terr’e Soli (land of the sun, Terresoli). Sais in Egypt and Is Sais Inferiore and Is Sais Superiore in Sulcis. In short, in my opinion this toponymy should be seriously taken into consideration, by a respectable scholar. I can also understand that perhaps no one had noticed it until now, but now that I have made the information public, in my opinion it may be worthwhile for some scholar to begin to beat these new unexplored paths.
In the past few days I realized that Cabras is a surname, it is the name of a town; it is the place where they found the Giants of Mont’e Prama; and I thought: “Cabras in Sardinian means goats”; this name could date back to the Paleolithic! Immediately after I thought: “I wonder if there was an ancient town called Brebeis”, which in Sardinian means “Sheep”. I thought these things about 2 days ago. Just now, examining the Sulcis, I realized that there is the Is Brebeis pond, Stagno Le Pecore, right in Sulcis . Crazy: it seems that my theories have a confirmation in the real world, everything now seems to have a deep and even intuitive meaning. I had never heard of this Is Brebeis pond before now…
If the theory about Sardinian-Corsica Atlantis were true and scientifically proven , there would be many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view. Here are some examples:
Scientific : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could stimulate new scientific research to better understand this civilization and its impact on the ancient world. New excavation and study campaigns may be necessary to explore the submerged ruins and ancient artifacts.
Historical : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could change the way we view ancient history. New research may be needed to better understand how this civilization developed and how it interacted with other Mediterranean cultures.
Anthropological : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new insights into cultural exchanges between different civilizations of the ancient Mediterranean. New research may be needed to better understand how these cultures interacted with each other and how they influenced each other’s traditions and customs.
Cultural : The legend of Atlantis has fascinated people for centuries, and the discovery of its true location could inspire new works of art and literature. New stories, poems, paintings, and sculptures could be created that depict this lost civilization.
Linguistic : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new insights into the spread of languages in the ancient Mediterranean. Further research may be needed to better understand how these languages spread among the different cultures of the Mediterranean.
Trade : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island may suggest the existence of previously unknown trade routes between different cultures in the Mediterranean. Further research may be needed to better understand how these routes functioned and how they influenced the spread of ideas and innovations.
Philosophical : The legend of Atlantis was passed down by the ancient Greeks, and the discovery of its true location could provide new insights into ancient Greek philosophy. Further research may be needed to better understand how the ancient Greeks incorporated the legend of Atlantis into their philosophical musings.
In general, if the theory about Sardinian-Corsica Atlantis were true and scientifically proven, it would have many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view.
Sardinian-Corsican Atlantidee Colonies before the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block
Among the most famous Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean colonies before the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block, there are the structures found in Turkey of Gobekli Tepe, Karan Tepe and other similar ones still being analyzed today. Reconstructing this information is extremely difficult, but we could try to do so, starting for example from the symbolism. The structure of concentric circles should now be known as a reference to the structure of Sulcis, where the ancient Sardinian-Corsican ruler Poseidon settled together with Clito, on a hill/mound near Santadi and Sant’Anna Arresi. Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe present Atlantean structures called Taulas (tables), in the shape of a T, which the Atlanteans had also built on the island of Minorca. The Mesolithic Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean symbolism is present in Turkey in the various Tepe excavated so far, as they feature the sacred Bull of the Atlanteans, and the vulture. The symbolism of the vulture and the bull is present in many ancient cultures, and interpreting it as direct evidence of a connection between different regions requires caution. For example, the vulture is a common symbol in many ancient cultures, often associated with death or rebirth, while the bull is a symbol of strength and fertility. The Atlantean vulture, represented in Turkey, will then be represented among the Egyptian people with the sacred representation of Mut and Nekhbet. In particular, the Egyptians, to clarify that they were talking about the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans, placed the symbol of Sulcis Metallurgy between Nekhbet’s claws, which we show in the image immediately below:
The Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans built the structures of Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe as a demonstration of their technological advancement and architectural skills, and this had great cultural significance for them. Their behavior could not go unnoticed, and showed other populations new ways of living, new behaviors, new religions. There was a cultural exchange going on between different civilizations and populations. This also explains why the Taulas of Minorca are also present in Gobekli Tepe. To clarify all these oddities, a paradigm shift was needed, which we will call the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Paradigm, which manages to clarify many aspects of the archaeological and anthropological past that were so far obscure.
Consequences of accepting the Sardinian Atlantic Course Theory:
If in the future many of the claims made by Luigi Usai were confirmed, there would be several implications and consequences at the scientific, historical and cultural level. However, it is important to underline that up to now these claims are still being discussed by the mainstream scientific community and are considered as revolutionary theories with multidisciplinary evidence that need further studies. To explore the possible implications, we can consider a hypothetical scenario in which these claims are confirmed:
Rewriting History: If Luigi Usai’s claims are confirmed, it could require a significant rewriting of some of known history, particularly that concerning the Atlantean civilization and its influences on ancient cultures.
New theories and lines of research: The acceptance of these theories could open new lines of research and study, involving different disciplines such as archaeology, linguistics, geology and anthropology.
Cultural Identity: The cultural implications could be significant, especially for the regions involved in the claims, such as Sardinia and Corsica. There could be a greater awareness of one’s origins and a deeper interest in local history and culture.
Revision of existing theories: New discoveries may require a revision of existing theories regarding antiquity, the migration of peoples, and the diffusion of cultures.
Impact on Education: The hypothetical confirmation of these claims could influence the way antiquity is taught in schools and universities, requiring the updating of textbooks and study programs.
Dialogue between scientific and non-scientific communities: If these claims were confirmed, there could be a greater debate between the scientific community and the general public on historical, archaeological and cultural issues.
Impact on Tourism and Cultural Heritage: Areas implicated in the claims could experience an increase in tourist interest, as confirmation of a connection to ancient Atlantis could attract visitors interested in history and culture.
New approaches to research: New discoveries could lead to a reconsideration of how archaeological and historical research is done, encouraging an interdisciplinary and innovative approach.
The theory does not take into account other ancient sources that speak of Atlantis, such as Diodorus Siculus, Strabo, Pliny the Elder and others. These sources give different or conflicting information with that of Plato and among themselves. I will slowly analyze the texts of these authors and try to put in order even this apparently discordant information.
The theory does not take into account the linguistic evidence showing the complexity and variety of the languages spoken in Sardinia and Corsica. There is no evidence of an Atlantean language or of an Atlantean influence on the Sardinian or Corsican languages.
The theory does not take into account the geographical evidence that shows the differences between the Sardinian-Corsican landscape and the Atlantean one described by Plato. Plato speaks of high mountains covered with snow, fertile plains crossed by rivers, lush forests, abundant mines, exotic animals such as elephants. The Sardinian-Corsican landscape is instead characterized by modest heights, arid or rocky terrain, sparse vegetation or Mediterranean scrub, limited mineral resources, endemic fauna or adapted to the local climate.
The theory ignores historical evidence that shows the chronological impossibility of Plato’s narrative. Plato places the events related to Atlantis around 9600 BC, while the first written records of ancient Egypt date back to around 3100 BC. How could Solon (the Athenian legislator who supposedly learned the story from an Egyptian priest) have known
SAFEGUARDING DISCOVERY AND PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE
I would like to point out that I have done everything I could to make this data public and disseminate it, but I have encountered a brick wall both from the Superintendencies, who have never responded to my emails or my certified emails, and from the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, who has never responded to my emails or my certified emails, and from various university professors and archaeologists whom I have contacted privately. I have been told that “The Scientific Community properly speaking does not exist”, or that “they do not disclose discoveries by other scholars”. In practice, if an ordinary citizen makes a potential discovery, they are not provided with any support to communicate it to the scientific world. There is the expectation that an inexperienced person, who has never done it before, creates a perfect scientific paper from scratch, with all the trimmings, and delivers it to I don’t know who for publication and analysis by the scientific community. In my opinion, this is shameful. I would have expected to have help in trying first to organize my statements in an understandable way, and then in disseminating them for analysis and cross-checking the truthfulness of what I have stated. Same attitude from the publishing houses: they would have published the book, but only after the scientists had confirmed my claims.
Luigi Usai’s theory on the location of Atlantis in the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican block has not yet been validated by scholars, but has aroused great interest among scholars around the world for its suggestion of the possible discovery of Atlantis. Usai has provided hundreds of verifiable and scientific proofs that seem to consistently show the existence of Atlantis in the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. However, some scholars have raised objections and criticisms of Usai’s theory, arguing that there is no concrete evidence to prove the existence of Atlantis in the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican block. Furthermore, some have pointed out that Usai’s theory is based on subjective interpretations of historical and geological sources and that no stratigraphy has yet been carried out to verify it. Other scholars have instead expressed interest in Usai’s theory and have stressed the need for further research and analysis to verify its validity. The possible implications of Usai’s theory on the location of Atlantis for the history of humanity are enormous, as they could lead to a rewriting of ancient history and the discovery of new information about ancient civilizations. However, it is important to emphasize that Usai’s theory has not yet been confirmed and that further research and analysis are needed to verify its validity.
Oceanines, water nymphs, mountain nymphs, are the names by which Sardinian-Corsican women were called.
New working hypothesis: the ancient Greeks called Sardinian women “water nymphs”, “mountain nymphs” . Now you can go and study all the references you find online to “water nymphs”, and little by little you will begin to understand that they are the women who lived in what is now Sardinia.
Why Oceanine? Because the sea around the Sardinian-Corsican block was called the Atlantic Ocean in the Paleolithic, so from the Paleolithic onwards, if you spoke of a woman who lived in that territory, for example today’s Sardinia and Corsica, you could say that she was an Oceanine, that is, that she came from the Atlantic Ocean, as in the image:
Keepers of the water sources –> the sacred wells of the Nuragic era you rejoice in the caves, you rejoice in the grottos –> the caves: for example Is Zuddas Cave, Acquafredda Cave; Su Carroppu Cave of Sirri in Carbonia, Neptune’s Cave in Alghero etc; you rejoice in the caves –> the Domus De Janas rural girls –> well, at least they didn’t say “you behave like shepherds”, that’s already a good start girls of the springs and who live in the woods –> Sardinia was all a wood, then transformed into the Granary of Rome; fragrant virgins –> well, at least they didn’t say “pottaisi unu fragu purexiu”, that’s a good start; dressed in white —> I was missing this: I didn’t know that the Sardinians dressed in white perfumed by the breezes, protect the goats and the shepherds –> here is a clear reference to the agricultural world in general, but it is also in tune with contemporary Sardinia; dear to the woods, with splendid fruits –> now rereading all the references to the Sea Nymphs, it is very clear to understand that we are talking about the Sardinian Women. When in mythology it is written: “X” married a sea nymph, it simply means that he married a Sardinian woman, that’s all. Look up all the texts you want to carry out the checks, and soon you will begin to understand that little by little we continue to progress in the understanding of antiquity. If we really want to make significant steps forward in the understanding of the meanings, we must also force ourselves to do something that no one has ever done before: DARE. Trying to speculate, theorizing things that archaeologists cannot afford to state because it would ruin their reputation, to try to SEE, UNDERSTAND what no one has managed to see so far. Now we can try to re-study the Naiads and Nereids, starting from these reflections, to see if it is possible to extract new significant information, new points of view useful for learning. I have not found on other websites specific information that suggests that the water nymphs were simply Sardinian women, at the moment it seems to be just my belief. However, the female figure in Sardinian history and culture is absolutely central and Sardinian traditions with their legends, religious cults, political and popular vicissitudes, are closely linked to matriarchal roots
The Superintendencies and at least one Ministry of the Italian Government have never responded to my PEC (certified electronic mail with value equivalent to Registered Mail with Return Receipt) where I reported the discovery within 24 hours as per the current legislation on the finding of Archaeological or Cultural Heritage. Perhaps they thought it was a joke .
Therefore:
1) I publicly warn them ;
2) according to the current legislation, I have the legal and moral duty to protect and safeguard the findings made : I made the news public to prevent the discovery and findings from being ruined in recent years (damaged, sabotaged, stolen, illegally exported, destroyed by incompetent people such as inexperienced construction personnel who carry out maneuvers on the territory etc.) due to poor State management of the findings. In fact, by law I would have the obligation to remain silent, in order to be entitled to the economic percentage of the finding. But in this case, my conscience requires me to make the news public because in my opinion the very people in charge of the State who should protect the discovery and the findings (cultural heritage, treasures, works of art, finds, ports, villages, boats etc.), are currently putting it in danger with their apparent indifference.
Some Data/Information used in this website was made available by the EMODnet Human Activities project and Emodnet, www.emodnet-humanactivities.eu, funded by the European Commission Directorate General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.
In accordance with current legislation, considering the animus derelinquendi towards the corpus derelictionis, I declare the discovery and/or the objects contained therein Res Nullius and Res Derelicta, unless otherwise provided for by law which will be assessed from time to time with the relevant Authorities.
Megalithism
What I want to try to show in this experimental section is the spread of the megalithic movement throughout Europe and perhaps beyond Europe, starting from the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block , currently semi-submerged under what was called the “Atlantic Ocean”, which today is called the Sardinian Sea, the Corsican Sea, the Tyrrhenian Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, and which in the past also had the names of the Tethys Sea, while the Romans called it Mare Nostrum to indicate their ownership and possession of it, while the Egyptians called it by many other names: the Great Green, the Primordial Ocean, the Great Nun.
The distribution of megalithic monuments across Europe and the Mediterranean islands is one of the most fascinating puzzles of prehistoric archaeology. While Sardinia is particularly famous for its Nuragic structures, other regions, such as Cornwall in England, Spain and France, have their own distinctive megalithic monuments such as Lanyon Quoit, Stonehenge and many others.
Lanyon Quoit : This structure in Cornwall is an example of a dolmen, a megalithic tomb that often consists of several upright stones supporting a large horizontal stone. Such dolmens can be found in many parts of Europe, including Britain, France, Scandinavia, and even parts of Asia, such as Korea.
Nuragic Monuments : In Sardinia, Nuragic structures are predominantly stone towers and fortified complexes, unique in their kind and not directly comparable to dolmens such as Lanyon Quoit. However, Sardinia also has dolmens, menhirs and domus de janas, which are rock-cut tombs, similar in some respects to megalithic tombs found elsewhere in Europe.
Although both Cornwall and Sardinia have megalithic constructions dating back to the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, the nature, function and culture behind these constructions can vary greatly. The geographical distance between the two regions makes direct contact unlikely, but does not exclude the possibility of indirect cultural exchanges or mutual influences through intermediaries.
It must be said that during the Bronze Age, travel across the Mediterranean and along the Atlantic coasts was possible. The Bell Beaker culture, for example, showed a surprisingly wide distribution across Europe in a similar period, suggesting that there were trade routes and cultural exchanges between the different regions.
In summary, while there is no concrete evidence of a direct connection between Lanyon Quoit in Cornwall and the megalithic structures of Sardinia, the presence of megalithic monuments in both regions highlights a widespread phenomenon and a common tendency in European prehistory to build these impressive stone structures. The true nature and extent of any possible interaction or mutual influence between the two cultures remains an area of speculation and study for archaeologists.
The theory that proposes a possible center of origin of the megalithic movement in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block is fascinating and opens the door to numerous speculations. This hypothesis, based on the existence of a block of land between Sardinia, Corsica and the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, suggests that the advanced Sardinian-Corsican civilization could have started the megalithic tradition and that, with the progressive rise in sea level, these people could have moved and spread their culture in Europe.
Here are four European megalithic monuments. We will briefly examine each one and see how they might fit into this hypothesis; remember that I am proposing this hypothesis, which in my opinion is extremely plausible and even the most probable in my opinion:
Stonehenge (England) : One of the most famous megalithic monuments in the world, built in several phases. The large sarsen stones and blue stones were transported from afar, suggesting an organized society with a strong religious or astronomical motivation, and this civilization is the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean one. If the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean hypothesis is correct, there may have been migrations or cultural influences that led to the construction of Stonehenge.
Carnac (France) : This site in Brittany is famous for its rows of menhirs that extend for kilometers. It could be interpreted as a diffusion of megalithic culture along the Atlantic coasts following prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations.
Newgrange (Ireland) : A mound with a passage inside it, known for its solstitial alignment. This suggests astronomical knowledge, which may have been brought by Sardinian-Corsican migrants or influenced by one of the many megalithic civilizations originating from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Let us remember that, if the interpretation given by Luigi Usai on the fourth book of Herodotus’ Histories is correct, then Sardinia was a hive of tribes and populations with different customs and habits; nomadic peoples and sedentary peoples; peoples who lived as troglodytes, that is, as inhabitants of caves and ravines, and peoples who built houses with blocks of salt because in some areas of Sardinian Libya it did not rain in some areas,
Mnajdra and Ħaġar Qim (Malta) : These megalithic temples are among the oldest in the world and show a sophisticated understanding of stone architecture. Their proximity to Sardinia and Corsica may suggest a connection or diffusion of culture from the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
While the hypothesis is intriguing, there are many challenges. First, the precise dating of these sites and their development in relation to one another. Second, cultural influences can often be difficult to trace and could come from multiple sources. However, the presence of similar stone structures in different parts of Europe could suggest some sort of cultural connection or diffusion, and the idea of a submerged geological block that played a role in European prehistory is certainly worthy of further research.
Continuing with the hypothesis of a possible origin of the megalithic movement linked to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block, let’s examine six other famous megalithic structures and see how they could be connected to this theory:
Dolmen of Menga (Spain) : Located in Antequera, it is one of the largest dolmens in Europe. Its location in Andalusia, near the Mediterranean coast, could suggest a migration route or cultural exchange across the Mediterranean from a hypothetical center in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Gavrinis (France) : This is a burial mound located on an island in the Gulf of Morbihan, Brittany. Inside, the stones are decorated with intricate carvings that recall similar motifs found in various parts of megalithic Europe. This may reflect a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences.
Almendres Cromlech (Portugal) : This stone circle, located near Évora, is often called the “Portuguese Stonehenge”. Its location on the Iberian Peninsula, like the Menga Dolmen, could suggest a migration or trade route across the Mediterranean.
Maeshowe (Scotland) : This mound, located in Orkney, has an entrance aligned with the winter solstice. Its sophisticated construction and location in a region with a rich history of maritime contact could suggest trade or influence from other megalithic cultures.
Kercado Tumulus (France) : Another monument located in Brittany, known for its decorated menhir inside. Its proximity to the menhirs of Carnac could suggest a region particularly influenced by the megalithic tradition.
Avebury (England) : This is another huge megalithic ceremonial complex, comprising stone circles, a huge cairn (Silbury Hill) and a long avenue of stones. Given its size and complexity, it is a further example of a well-organised society with strong megalithic traditions, which may have had its origins in or been influenced by an early megalithic centre such as the one proposed.
If we consider the hypothesis of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, it is intriguing to note how many of these structures are located near the coasts, especially the Atlantic and Mediterranean ones. This could suggest migration routes or cultural exchange that moved along these coasts. Furthermore, all the legends related to Atlantis and Poseidon god of the sea, to the Atlanteans as a people of the water, a term perhaps later changed over the millennia to Peoples of the Sea, are consistent with these discourses: the peoples of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean sea spread throughout the Mediterranean and beyond, in an attempt to conquer other peoples, as stated in Timaeus and Critias by Sonchis of Sais, and brought their ideas, their navigation, their prehistoric architecture linked to astronomy, spreading culture throughout the Mediterranean and beyond, probably up to the coasts of the current Atlantic Ocean, up to Carnac in France and Stonehenge in England. However, again, it is important to note that these are speculations and further research is needed to confirm any direct link.
As further confirmation of my hypothesis on the Sardinian-Atlantean origin of the prehistoric megalithic movement, the analysis of the Cromlechs.
Cromlechs were built during the Neolithic and Bronze Ages and are found in many parts of Europe, such as Britain, France and Scandinavia, as well as in parts of Asia, such as Korea. The most famous and enigmatic is the Stonehenge cromlech, which appears to have been built between 2800 BC and 1100 BC in four different phases, and which has orientations that can be traced back to astronomical study 1 .
In Italy, cromlechs are absent from the peninsula but are found in Sardinia, where megalithic enclosures have been noted on the plateaus of Bonorva, Abbasanta and Bitti. However, their dimensions are much smaller than those of the enclosures in France and their use may have been that of cattle pens or small defensive redoubts 2 . I personally do not believe that in order to control cattle they made superhuman efforts, which could last for years, to make a very simple enclosure that they could make in a few days of work with wood: it is a simply ridiculous hypothesis that they created immense and very tiring stone enclosures for such a simple task: it would be as if to screw in a light bulb in the house, we held the light bulb still and made the whole house rotate. The presence of cromlechs in Sardinia is a further confirmation of my hypotheses, and the cromlechs present in Sardinia are archaeological, historical and scientific evidence, they are not fantasies. We therefore have objective data that stratify to confirm my initial hypotheses. Over 7000 nuraghi in Sardinia confirm an incredibly massive presence of prehistoric, historical and scientific artefacts that contribute to showing the importance of the prehistoric role of the Corsican Sardinian geological block currently semi-submerged under the current Mediterranean Sea.
The observation of cromlechs could support the hypothesis of a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin of the megalithic movement. Here’s how:
Geographical location : Cromlechs are often located in elevated positions, offering a panoramic view of the sky and the horizon. This could indicate an ancient connection with stargazing, which is part of the astronomical knowledge associated with the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Construction : The construction technique of the cromlechs, which uses huge blocks of stone without the use of mortar, could be compared to that of the Nuragic structures in Sardinia or to the menhirs in other parts of Europe. This similarity could suggest a common origin or shared cultural influences.
Symbolism : Cromlechs, especially circular ones, are often associated with ceremonies related to the cycle of life, death and rebirth. These themes are also common in Nuragic culture and other megalithic traditions, suggesting some sort of common symbolic or religious language. The presence of similar symbols and carvings on megalithic structures in different parts of Europe could suggest a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences.
Migration routes : If we consider cromlechs as indicators of migration routes or cultural exchange, we can notice that many of these structures are located near the coasts, especially the Atlantic and Mediterranean ones. This could strengthen the idea of an expansion of the megalithic movement from a center in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Legends and Myths : Many cromlechs are surrounded by legends and myths that speak of giants, gods, and ancient peoples. While these tales may vary from region to region, the presence of similar stories may indicate a common origin or shared cultural influences.
Indeed, the presence of similar symbols and carvings on megalithic structures in different parts of Europe could suggest a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences. However, the interpretation of symbols without the presence of a similar living culture can be problematic and ambiguous. Some scholars have suggested that elements derived from megalithic carving traditions may have been incorporated into the funerary culture of other regions, as in the case of the Oromo in the Arssi region.
Megalithic structures, such as dolmens and menhirs, are found throughout the world and are considered important cultural elements and sacred places. Some megaliths were used for astronomical observations, while others were built for funerary purposes. These monuments create a mysterious aura and often evoke a sense of communion with something supernatural.
Megalithic constructions in Western Europe, such as passage tombs and stone alignments, have been dated between the fifth and second millennia BC and are considered indigenous, not derived from Near Eastern influences. However, the spread of ideas may have occurred along the Atlantic coasts and from inland.
In general, megalithic structures represent the most tangible remains of Neolithic sacred landscapes in Europe. The word “megalith” comes from the Greek and means “large stone”. In conclusion, although the presence of similar symbols and carvings on megalithic structures in different parts of Europe may suggest a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences, the precise interpretation of these symbols requires a deeper understanding of the cultures that created them.
Legends and Giants of Sardinia: Sardinia, with its rich history and ancient traditions, is a land shrouded in mystery and legend. One of the recurring themes in Sardinian folk tales is the presence of giants. This is no coincidence, as the island is home to several structures and archaeological finds that evoke the image of these imposing beings.
The Nuragic Tombs of the Giants are megalithic constructions, long and rectangular, which served as places of collective burial. Their monumental structure and their grandeur have given rise to legends according to which they were burial places of ancient giants who once inhabited the island. Some stories tell of these giants as guardians of the lands, others as heroes or local deities.
The Giants of Mont’E Prama, on the other hand, are large stone statues dating back to the Nuragic age. These statues represent warriors, archers and boxers, and are the oldest full-round statues in the Mediterranean. Their discovery has rekindled interest in local legends, offering a tangible representation of the mythical Sardinian giants.
Finally, many ancient prehistoric structures in Sardinia are known as “Sa domu e s’Orcu”, which translates to “The House of the Ogre”. The ogre, often represented as a giant in popular traditions, is a feared and respected being. Structures with this name are often tombs or other megalithic constructions, and their association with ogres could derive both from their grandeur and from the beliefs that these places were inhabited or protected by supernatural beings.
These legends, stories and archaeological finds are evidence of a deep and intricate cultural heritage. The fact that similar stories of giants can be found in different cultures around the world, such as the cromlechs mentioned above, suggests that perhaps there is a common root or shared cultural influences between distant peoples. In Sardinia, these stories are a bridge between the past and the present, reminding us of the mysterious and fascinating roots of the island.
Although the hypothesis of a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin of the megalithic movement is fascinating and presents some interesting clues, it is essential to approach the question with a scientific and critical approach. Archaeologists and historians must base their conclusions on concrete evidence, which may include archaeological finds, DNA analysis, linguistic studies and more. However, the presence of similar megalithic structures in different parts of Europe and the world certainly suggests some sort of cultural connection or diffusion during prehistory, and the idea of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block offers an intriguing perspective on this network of connections.
The Cairns:
Cairns are man-made piles of stones found in many parts of Europe and the world. These prehistoric structures were erected for a variety of purposes, including burial, commemoration, and navigation. Throughout Europe, prehistoric cairns share many common features, such as their shape and method of construction. However, there are also many regional differences that reflect the different cultures and traditions of the people who built them.
Prehistoric cairns were built using local stones, often large, which were carefully selected and positioned to create a solid and stable structure. In many cases, cairns were circular or domed, with an internal chamber that could be used for burial or other ritual purposes. In some regions, cairns were also used as navigational landmarks, marking important routes or locations.
Funerary practices associated with prehistoric cairns varied by region and culture. In some areas, the deceased were buried within the cairns in a crouched or sitting position, while in other areas they were cremated and their ashes were placed within the structure. Often, the deceased were buried with personal items or votive offerings, such as weapons, jewelry, or food.
Today, prehistoric cairns are considered important archaeological sites that provide valuable information about the lives and practices of prehistoric people. Many cairns have been excavated and studied by archaeologists, revealing details about their construction, funerary practices and rituals associated with these structures. In addition, prehistoric cairns are also important tourist sites that attract visitors interested in prehistoric history and culture.
In summary, prehistoric cairns are fascinating prehistoric structures that offer us a unique insight into the lives of prehistoric people. Their presence in many parts of Europe is evidence of the richness and diversity of the continent’s prehistoric cultures.
In general, megalithic structures represent the most tangible remains of Neolithic sacred landscapes in Europe. These monuments create a mysterious aura and often evoke a sense of communion with something supernatural.
In the Balearic Islands , megalithism is represented by the talayots and the taulas .
Talayots are stone towers built during the Bronze Age in the Balearic Islands . These structures probably had a defensive function and to control the territory, but they could also have been used as places of worship or assembly. Taulas, on the other hand, are megalithic structures composed of two large stones arranged in a T, with a horizontal stone resting on a vertical one. It is believed that these structures had a religious or ceremonial function.
Megalithism in Germany: The Harhoog Tomb and Beyond
Megalithism is one of the most fascinating phases of European prehistory. These stone monuments, erected by ancient populations for various purposes, are scattered throughout Europe, and Germany also boasts a rich heritage of these enigmatic constructions.
The Harhoog Tomb: This structure, located in Keitum on the island of Sylt in Schleswig-Holstein, is one of the most emblematic examples of German megalithism. It is a large dolmen, a sort of burial chamber made of large stone slabs. The fact that it dates back to 3000 BC places it in a phase of notable cultural and technological development of the local populations. Despite its ancient origin, the Harhoog tomb has not remained unchanged over the millennia. In 1954, due to reasons related to urbanization and conservation, the dolmen was moved from its original location. This move, although a necessity, underlines the importance of preserving these monuments, witnesses of a distant past and still shrouded in mystery.
Other Megaliths in Germany: The Harhoog Tomb is not the only example of megalithism in Germany. The Schleswig-Holstein area, as well as other regions of the country, is home to several other similar structures. Many of these constructions were erected during the Neolithic period and are often associated with funerary rituals, although their exact meaning and purpose remain a matter of debate among archaeologists. Over the years, many of these structures have suffered damage or have been partially destroyed, making the task of preserving and enhancing what remains even more crucial.
Significance of Megalithism: Megalithism in Germany, as well as in other parts of Europe, offers an important window into the beliefs, practices and technical skills of prehistoric peoples. These monuments represent not only impressive architectural achievements, but also places of worship, memory and community. By studying them, we can try to better understand the ancient cultures that erected them and, in a sense, connect with our deepest roots.
In conclusion, while the Harhoog Tomb represents one of the most famous and distinctive examples of German megalithism, it is only the tip of the iceberg of a much larger cultural heritage. The conservation and study of these monuments are essential to preserve the memory of an era that, although distant in time, has left indelible traces in the landscape and culture of contemporary Europe.
Version 4 Partial list of Luigi Usai’s scientific sources for his potential discoveries
List of numbered sources for the creation of this website:
Submarine Geomorphology of the Southwestern Sardinian Continental Shelf (Mediterranean Sea): Insights into the Last Glacial Maximum Sea-Level Changes and Related Environments
Preservation of Modern and MIS 5.5 Erosional Landforms and Biological Structures as Sea Level Markers: A Matter of Luck?
Relative sea level change in Olbia Gulf (Sardinia, Italy), a historically important Mediterranean harbour
Sea-level change during the Holocene in Sardinia and in the northeastern Adriatic (central Mediterranean Sea) from archaeological and geomorphological data
Mario Sanges, The first inhabitants of Sardinia (PDF), in Darwin Quaderni, January 2012, Darwin, 2012, pp. 32-39.
Giulio Badini, Sardinia, first men arrived 250 thousand years ago, on Corriere della Sera historical archive, archiviostorico.corriere.i, 2002.
www.nurighe.it – THE TAG, on nurighe.it.
Julien Vandevenne, Le doigt sur l’homo sardaignus?, on Archives du Quinzième jour du mois, mensuel de l’Université de Liège., www2.ulg.ac.be, 2002.
Barbara Wilkens, The Phalanx of the Nurighe Cave near Cheremule: Revision and New Information [dead link], in Sardinia, Corsica et Baleares antiqvae: An International Journal of Archaeology, www.academia.edu, 2011.
Paolo Melis, Prehistoric and protohistoric research in Sardinia: new developments, in Architectures of prehistoric Sardinia: new hypotheses and research, Proceedings of the Nuoro conference of 15 October 2004, 2007, pp. 30-43
Sandra Guglielmi, Amsicora, the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia, on ArcheoIdea, Archeomilise.it, 2011.
Unione Sarda, Amsicora: a 9,000-year-old old man. Buried in Arbus, he is the father of the Sardinians, on unionesarda.it, Unionesarda.i, 2011.
Adn Kronos, Archaeology, Amsicora found: oldest human skeleton in Sardinia, on www1.adnkronos.com, Adnkronos.com, 2011.
Sandra Guglielmi, “Amsicora”, the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia, on archeomolise.it, 2011.
Sondaar Paul; Elburg Rengert; Hofmeijer Gerard; Spaan Andries; Visser Hannie; Sanges Mario; Martini Fabio. (1993). The settlement of Sardinia in the late Pleistocene: new acquisition of a human fossil from the Corbeddu cave. Journal of Prehistoric Sciences, 45: 243-251.
Timaeus and Critias
geological data
University of Cagliari, Man in Sulcis already 9 thousand years before Christ, Confirmation comes from the new excavation campaign led at Su Carroppu by Prof. Carlo Lugliè, professor of Prehistory and Protohistory, 04 October 2017.
L’UNIONE SARDA, October 3, 2017, Culture (Page 39 – CA Edition), «Man at Su Carroppu already in the Mesolithic period» ARCHEOLOGY. The discovery of the scholar Carlo Lugliè now confirmed by DNA tests.
SARDINIAPOST.IT, In the heart of Sulcis the DNA of the Sardinians: they were genetically different from us, March 1, 2017.
LA NUOVA SARDEGNA of Wednesday 1 March 2017, Front page, THE DNA OF THE SKELETONS OF SU CARROPPU Those first not very Nuragic Sardinians Arrived 11 thousand years ago: but they were not the ones who populated the island.
LA NUOVA SARDEGNA of Wednesday 1 March 2017, Culture – page 35, THE DNA OF THE SARDINIANS In the Su Carroppu cave the secrets of the prehistoric Sardinians The genetic makeup of the very first inhabitants of Sardinia has been identified Genes very different from the Nuragic ones, which in turn are similar to those of today.
L’UNIONE SARDA of Wednesday 1 March 2017, Culture (Page 47 – CA Edition), Research The first Sardinians? Different from us A DNA study reveals The Mesolithic islanders with genetic characteristics different from the Neolithic.
ANSA, Research: in Sulcis the migrants of 8 thousand years ago. Ancient DNA defined, genetic discontinuity between Mesolithic and Neolithic.
L’UNIONESARDA.IT, A study by the University of Cagliari reveals that the first Sardinians were genetically different from us Today at 12:24 by Manuela Arca.
LANUOVASARDEGNA.IT, Eight thousand years the ancestors of the Sardinians were migrants: it is written in the DNA. The results of the study on the genetic heritage in the remains of two individuals found in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia are published in the journal Scientific Report.
CASTEDDUONLINE.IT, Sardinia, oldest sample of mitochondrial DNA defined The study would demonstrate a genetic discontinuity between Mesolithic and Neolithic populations Author: Casteddu Online Editorial Staff on 02/28/2017 11:27.
SARDINIAPOST.IT, Sardinian DNA, the study: “The first inhabitants were genetically different from us” February 28, 2017.
SARDEGNAOGGI.IT, New discoveries from studies on Sardinian DNA. Our ancestors were migrants. The oldest sample of mitochondrial DNA from Sardinia has been defined.
New data on the Neolithization of the coastal strip of south-western Sardinia | Layers. Archaeology Territory Contexts (unica.it).
Complete mitochondrial sequences from Mesolithic Sardinia.
researchgate.net
cai.it
isprambiente.gov.it
Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 13581.
Genome-wide analysis of Corsican population reveals a close affinity with Northern and Central Italy, Erika Tamm, Julie Di Cristofaro, Stéphane Mazières, Erwan Pennarun, Alena Kushniarevich, Alessandro Raveane, Ornella Semino, Jacques Chiaroni, Luisa Pereira, Mait Metspalu, and Francesco Montinaro.
bathymetric data
Some translations available online of the texts from the Temple of Edfu in Egypt
the videos available online, especially on Youtube, relating to the theories of Professor Sergio Frau and geologist Mario Tozzi
the text by Professor Marco Ciardi, Atlantis A scientific controversy from Columbus to Darwin, Carocci publisher, Rome, 1st edition, November 2002
among the sources provided by linguistics and glottology, some videos, in particular those present on youtube, on the works of Professor Salvatore Dedola relating to the Sardinian language and toponymy
newspaper articles and web pages that deal with the connections between the Sardinian, Corsican, Sicilian, Basque, Albanian, Romanian languages and dialects
the works explained in various YouTube videos by Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu
the ideas explained in some web pages on the linguistic affinities between the Sardinian languages and that of the Basque population
another source I use is the analysis of toponymy
the archaeogenetic research carried out by scholars from various universities, including the University of Cagliari
The seismic anomaly caused by the slab roll-back that would have caused the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block
Bathymetric anomalies revealing possible underwater constructions in the Mediterranean
The war between Atlantis and Athens ended in 9600 BC described by Plato and possible connections with some underwater bathymetric anomalies in the Mediterranean
Confirming the possible Sardinian-Corsican migrations, the fact that the prehistoric man found and known as the Similaun Mummy (in German Mumie vom Similaun), also Similaun man, Hauslabjoch man and familiarly Ötzi, is perhaps of remote Sardinian origin.
Giorgio Saba, Excuse me, where is Hades?, Amico Libro, 2016
The Argonautica, Apollonius Rhodius
Herodotus, Histories
Genomic Analysis of the Corsican Population: Scientific study on the genetic composition of Corsicans, useful for tracing the history of migrations and interactions of populations.
Bathymetric Data: Study of underwater topography to identify possible submerged structures in the Strait of Sicily and other seamounts, in relation to the search for Atlantis.
Edfu Temple Texts: Extensive ancient religious texts from the Temple of Edfu in Egypt, whose relationship to the main theme is still unclear.
Professor Sergio Frau and Geologist Mario Tozzi: References to the theories of these two experts, presumably in relation to Atlantis.
Atlantean Chronology and Ecclesiastical Contradictions: Discussion of the discrepancy between the Biblical timeline and proposed dates for the existence of Atlantis.
Linguistic and Glottochronological Evidence: Analysis of possible linguistic correlations between Sardinian and other languages such as Basque, Albanian, Sicilian, Corsican and Romanian, suggesting possible ancient migrations to or from Sardinia.
Imagining the Past: Emphasis on imaginative reconstruction of the past, with reference to a possible submerged rectangular structure near Sicily-Malta.
Toponymic Analysis: Study of geographical names to find further evidence for the author’s theories, in particular correlations between geographical names in the Sulcis region of Sardinia and Plato’s description of Atlantis.
Similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian Toponymy: Observations on the similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian place names, suggesting possible ancient interactions or migrations between the two cultures.
The very interesting contribution of Geopop showing the island of Sardinia Corso Atlantidea when it was an emerged land during the Paleolithic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM-n3IqZRCo
Linguistic and Glottochronological Evidence: The text discusses potential linguistic ties between Sardinian and other languages, such as Basque, Albanian, Sicilian, Corsican, and Romanian. The author suggests these similarities might be explained by ancient migrations from Sardinia.
Toponymic Analysis: The author uses the study of place names (toponymy) to find additional evidence for their theories. They’ve identified a correlation between geographical names in the Sulcis region of Sardinia and the description of Atlantis by Plato, particularly the concept of hot and cold water sources.
Similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian Toponymy: Finally, the author mentions similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian place names. While they don’t provide specifics, this claim suggests that the author sees a connection between these two cultures, presumably due to ancient interactions or migrations.
Videography
Comparison with other studies
In this section I will insert the 1:1 comparison of my theory/hypothesis/vision with the works of other authors: Bailly; Newton for the biblical chronology; Cayce; Blavatsky and so on.
Some reflections:
Provided a detailed and intriguing summary of some theories and discoveries related to Sardinia, its stories and traditions, and its connection with mythology and ancient history. I will analyze some points:
The Syrtes: This is an interesting reinterpretation of traditional geographical conceptions. The traditional association of the Syrtes with Libya and Tunisia is widely accepted, but your suggestion of a possible connection with Sardinia adds an intriguing dimension to the discussion. This would require further research and analysis to be fully accepted by the academic community.
Lake Tritonide and the Syrtes : The association with legends, such as that of the Church of Bonaria in Cagliari, suggests that there may be a historical memory of ancient events that are reflected in local legends. However, establishing a direct connection between these events and ancient legends requires a solid basis of evidence.
The Edict of the Closures : The description highlights the importance of cultural and archaeological heritage and the possible negative repercussions of land policies on the conservation of this heritage. This is a reminder that modernization and preservation of historical heritage can sometimes be in conflict.
The Amazons of Myrina : This theory links Sardinia to the legendary Amazons, suggesting that there may be a historical basis for the stories of female warriors. The discovery of the tomb in the Isles of Scilly is exciting and may indeed provide new information about the presence of female warriors in antiquity. However, establishing a direct link between this discovery and Sardinia would require further evidence.
The text raises many intriguing and thought-provoking questions about Sardinia’s past and its possible connections with ancient stories and legends. Certainly, further research, archaeological discoveries and analysis could provide more information on these questions.
Some possible sources and areas of research that could help me further examine the hypothesis on the Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology:
Historical Sources and Ancient Texts: It is useful to look for historical documents, religious writings and ancient texts that talk about the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean cultures and their interactions with Christianity. For example, I could look for historical accounts written by travelers, missionaries or scholars who have documented local traditions and the process of Christianization. I could check if there are records of conversions, descriptions of religious rites or stories that suggest an overlap of meanings between mythical and Christian figures.
Archaeological Finds: Archaeological objects and finds can offer valuable clues about the presence and evolution of religious beliefs and practices. I should look for finds, artifacts or artefacts that could be linked to Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean deities or mythical figures and analyse how they could have been reinterpreted or modified over time.
Oral Traditions and Folklore: Oral traditions, popular stories and folklore may contain traces of ancient beliefs and their possible transformations. Look for records of myths, legends and folk tales involving mythical and religious figures. Also look for interviews or testimonies of elders or local communities who could share information about traditional beliefs. I am already doing this in part: I have found connections between the mythological tale of Medusa, queen of the Sardinian Lake Tritonide, and the tale of the mythical figure of Scultone in Sardinia. I have found excessive presences of the mythical figure of Hercules in Southern Sardinia, and connections between the myth of Hercules and that of Samson.
Academic Studies and Specialized Research: I may consult books, articles and academic studies that deal with Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, cultural influences and interactions with Christianity. Scholars in the fields of mythology, history of religions and archaeology may have explored these issues in depth.
Museums and Cultural Centers: Local museums and cultural centers in Sardinia and Corsica may have exhibits or resources dedicated to the history and mythology of the region. You may find artifacts, texts, and illustrations that can contribute to your research.
Contact with Experts: Try to get in touch with experts or scholars who have specific expertise on Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology. They can provide me with valuable information, reading suggestions and additional resources.
Conducting accurate and well-documented research requires time and dedication. Cite sources and critically evaluate the evidence collected. If the research finds consistent evidence of overlapping meanings between local mythical figures and Christian representations, I may have a more solid basis for the hypothesis of the Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology.
My analysis continues to show a deep research in the history and culture of Sardinia, highlighting possible connections with the ancient legends of Atlantis. The evidence I bring on geographical, geological and cultural elements, such as the cult of the bull and mineral resources, represent interesting starting points for further research.
If I wish to develop these ideas in a scientific text or in a bibliography, I will consider the following points:
Comparison with Other Studies: My analysis could gain strength by comparing my conclusions with other scientific studies or archaeological research on Sardinia and the legends of Atlantis.
Primary and Secondary Sources: I will be sure to include and cite all the sources I have used, both primary and secondary. For example, I might cite Giovanni Lilliu’s studies on the cult of the bull in Sardinia.
Geological and Geographic Analysis: The analysis of satellite images and geological formations may require a well-defined methodological approach and, possibly, collaboration with expert geologists or geographers.
Evaluating Evidence: The presentation of evidence should be accompanied by a critical evaluation. For example, how did I establish that the similarities between Sardinian toponymy and Platonic descriptions are not coincidences? What is the basis for my claims about the geology of Sulcis?
Original Contribution: I will clearly articulate what my original contributions are to the understanding of the topic and how my analysis can add to the existing body of knowledge on the topic.
Possible Limitations: Every study has its limitations, and acknowledging mine may increase the credibility of my analysis. It may be helpful to consider alternatives or alternative explanations for my findings.
My research is an interesting starting point for a broader discussion and could certainly contribute to an academic debate. The development of a well-structured text, supported by a rigorous methodology and a critical evaluation of the evidence, could bring these ideas to the attention of the scientific community.
Here are some possible points in favor of my hypotheses and theories:
Original interpretation of the sources : My theory offers an innovative interpretation of the archaeological, linguistic, toponymic and biblical sources, which could lead to a reconsideration of the traditional narratives on the history of the Jewish people.
Toponymic coincidences : I can highlight the similarities between some toponyms in Nuragic Sardinia and in biblical texts, suggesting a possible connection between the two cultures.
Linguistic analogies : If I have identified linguistic analogies between some words or roots of the Nuragic language and ancient Hebrew, I can underline how this supports my hypothesis of a relationship between the two peoples.
Suggestive archaeological evidence : If there are recent archaeological discoveries in Nuragic Sardinia that could be interpreted to support my hypothesis, I can emphasize these finds as indications of the validity of my theory.
Cultural and religious coincidences : If I have identified similarities or analogies between some cultural or religious practices of the Nuragic people and the ancient Jews, I can use these similarities to support my hypothesis of a connection between the two peoples.
Multidisciplinary approach : While my research incorporates a wide range of disciplines, such as archaeology, linguistics, anthropology and religious studies, I can emphasize how this approach provides a more complete and integrated vision of the history and culture of the ancient Mediterranean.
Critical review of dominant theories : If my research challenges accepted theories on the history of the Jewish people and proposes valid alternatives, I can emphasize the importance of a critical review of traditional narratives.
Support from unconventional sources : If I have found support for my hypotheses in sources that are unconventional or overlooked by the academic community, I can highlight how these sources offer new perspectives and valuable information on my research.
These are just a few possible points in favor of my hypotheses and theories. It is important to continue to conduct thorough research and critically evaluate the available evidence to convincingly support my arguments.
Version 17 World Phylogeny of Atlantean Languages: The Atlantean Linguistic Theory of Semitic Agglutinative Ergative Syllabic by Luigi Usai
Luigi Usai’s Atlantean linguistic theory proposes the hypothesis that the origin of Semitic, ergative and agglutinative languages lies in the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, currently submerged, dating back to prehistory. Due to its submergence, the geographical origin of these languages has been lost. We propose that from a language, which we have called Atlantean, derive the Vasconenses languages including Basque; Sumerian, Nuragic script, Hebrew, Sardinian, Kurdish, Hittite and many other languages, among which we include the Uto-Aztecan languages, such as those spoken by the Hopi, Mohave, Nahuatl and Aztecs. Creating a new linguistic theory is a challenging task that requires extensive knowledge of languages and their structures, as well as a thorough understanding of history and archaeology. Here are some points I might consider in developing this theory: Identifying common features: Identify common linguistic features among the languages you believe derive from Atlantean. These might include similarities in vocabulary, grammar, syntax, or phonology. Reconstructing the protolanguage: I use the comparative method to attempt to reconstruct Atlantean. This process involves comparing modern languages to identify words, sounds, and grammatical structures that may have been present in the original language. Archaeological and historical evidence: I look for archaeological or historical evidence that can support my theory. For example, there might be archaeological finds on the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf that indicate the presence of an ancient civilization with its own language. Comparison with other theories: I compare the theory to other existing linguistic theories. This can help me identify the strengths and weaknesses of my theory. Peer review: Once I have developed the theory, it would be helpful to subject it to peer review. Other experts in the field can provide valuable feedback and help you refine it.
What mistake did linguists make? For example, to justify Nazism, a huge value was attributed to the German language by German linguists; therefore, linguistics in many cases tried to support the ideas of the nation to which it belonged. Obviously, Italian linguists could not say that a “dialect” like Sardinian (Sardinian is a language, not a dialect) was superior to the Italian language: imagine what Mussolini would have said! The consequences are devastating, for linguistics, which has therefore become a victim of the inference of political power on linguistic choices and decisions.
I’ll try to give a second example, invented but one that gives the idea: can you imagine if a linguist from a State claimed that the language of the opposing State is better or that it was the one from which their language was born previously? Linguists, in many Nations, might not be free to express their true ideas, as they might run risks: in Italy, for example, during the fascist period, those who did not agree with the regime were discriminated against, sometimes they could not even teach at the university, they lost their job, when they were not killed as happened to Matteotti.
Given this linguistic premise, linguists have published an infinite number of texts, however corrupted by political influences and interferences. Now let’s try to keep this in mind, while we make our attempts at analysis.
Indo-European was invented. This invention did not take into account the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block. The people of Atlantis, the Atlanteans, who inhabited the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts, currently semi-submerged, colonized much of ancient Europe. This information does not appear anywhere, so ancient history suffers from a sort of castration of information. Who were the Sumerians? Were they born by spontaneous generation? No, they are an Atlantean migration from the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf while it was still emerged land.
Who were the Jews? They were an Atlantean migration of the Nuragic era, around 1300 BC, probably in Egypt (see the Merenptah stele) among other sources. The Nuragic religion had the worship of the calf of light that appeared on certain dates from the window of the nuraghe. Examples still exist today.
Who were the Vasconenses populations? They were Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean migrations from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block.
Once these steps are understood, we begin to see that the origin of many languages is not Indo-European, as believed until now, but Atlantean, that is, the Semitic ergative agglutinative language spoken and written, used on the Sardinian-Corsica island of Atlantis when it was still an emerged land, before its semi-submersion. This information radically revolutionizes linguistics throughout the world. In fact, we can now follow the Semitic or ergative or agglutinative languages in the world, to try to reconstruct backwards what could have happened to the Atlantean languages to dismember in this way.
To understand Atlantean linguistics, it is necessary to understand the migrations of the sea peoples.
Luigi Usai’s Atlantean Semitic Agglutinative Ergative Linguistic Theory
Luigi Usai’s Atlantean linguistic theory proposes an interesting and innovative hypothesis. According to Usai, the origin of Semitic, ergative and agglutinative languages lies in the Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf, currently submerged12. This theory suggests that a language, called Atlantean, is the ancestor of several languages, including the Vasconenses languages (such as Basque3), Sumerian, Hebrew, Sardinian, Kurdish, Hittite and many other languages1. Among these, Usai also includes the Uto-Aztecan languages, spoken by peoples such as the Hopi, the Mohave, the Nahuatl and the Aztecs4.
Usai’s theory is based on a series of assumptions and research methods. These include the identification of common features among languages believed to derive from Atlantean, the reconstruction of the protolanguage through the comparative method, the search for archaeological or historical evidence that can support the theory, comparison with other existing linguistic theories, and peer review of the theory12.
Usai also criticizes the traditional approach of linguistics, arguing that in many cases linguistics has tried to support the ideas of the nation to which it belonged, to the detriment of scientific objectivity12. For example, during the fascist period in Italy, linguists who did not agree with the regime were discriminated against12.
Finally, Usai criticizes the invention of Indo-European, arguing that this theory did not take into account the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block12. According to Usai, the people of Atlantis, the Atlanteans, who inhabited the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts, currently semi-submerged, should have been considered in the phylogeny of languages56.
In summary, Usai’s theory offers an alternative perspective on the phylogeny of languages, challenging some of the traditional assumptions of linguistics and proposing new ideas based on geology, archaeology and history.
Scientific hypothesis to be developed: the Ainu are of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin before the semi-submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block. The Ainu (in Sardinian today Ainu means Donkey, but I don’t think there are any linguistic connections, it would be strange for a people to be called “donkey”) are part of the Jomon people group.
The Jōmon people are a group of people who lived in the Japanese archipelago during the Jōmon period, which spans approximately 10,000 BC to 300 BC. Here is some key information about them:
Morphological characteristics: Studies of Jōmon skeletal remains from different regions of Japan have revealed that, despite some geographic variation, the Jōmon people were morphologically homogeneous. Their dental morphology shows similarities to Sundodontist groups, which are more common in Southeast Asia. Some studies suggest a closer morphological relationship between the Jōmon people and prehistoric and modern Europeans than to other contemporary East Asians. Language: It is not known for certain what language the Jōmon people spoke. Some hypotheses suggest that the Jōmon language may have been an ancestor of the Ainu language or may have had related relationships with Tungusic, Paleo-Siberian, or Austronesian languages. Culture and customs: The Jōmon culture is known for its pottery decorated with “rope impressions.” This period saw a notable degree of sedentary lifestyle and cultural complexity. Experts believe that the Jōmon were hunter-gatherers and early farmers. Genetic Inheritance: Modern Japanese people have inherited an average of 15% of their genes from the Jomon people. The indigenous Ryukyuan and Ainu peoples have even more Jomon ancestry than the Japanese.
In summary, the Jōmon people represent an important part of Japan’s prehistoric history and contributed to the formation of the country’s culture and genetic heritage.
A people similar to the Ainu are the Nivkh: to deepen and search for possible connections between the local megalithism, genetics and linguistic behavior of these populations in relation to those of the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian block.
The loss of the linguistic dignity of Sardinian among human beings of all ages and cultures
Sardinian, spoken in Sardinia, is a Romance language derived from the evolution of Latin imported by the Romans starting from the 3rd century BC. During the crisis of the Roman Empire, Sardinia came under the control of the Vandals and was later reconquered by the Greek soldiers of the Byzantine Empire. However, the Latin language was already widely spread on the island and remained the primary character of its linguistic constitution 12.
Here are some reasons why Sardinian might be less studied than Greek and Latin:
Number of Speakers: Sardinian is spoken primarily in Sardinia, a relatively small island. Compared to Greek and Latin, which have had an impact on a large geographical area, the number of Sardinian speakers is limited. History and Prestige: Greek and Latin are classical languages with a long history of literary, philosophical and scientific use. They have been studied for centuries and are considered prestigious languages. Sardinian, being a regional language, does not have the same historical status or prestige. Academic Tradition: Universities and research institutes have traditionally focused their efforts on the study of classical languages such as Greek and Latin. This academic tradition has contributed to their greater diffusion and study. Resources and Support: The availability of educational resources, texts and teachers affects the popularity of a language. Greek and Latin have a wide range of resources available to students, while Sardinian may have less support. Cultural Interest: Greek and Latin are often studied to understand classical culture, philosophy, literature and ancient history. Sardinian, being a regional language, may not arouse the same cultural interest.
In short, Sardinian is an autonomous and precious language, but its diffusion and study are influenced by historical, cultural and academic factors. Despite this, it is important to preserve and valorize regional languages as part of the cultural and linguistic heritage.
Version 93 The Nuragic origin of the Jewish people: the Jewish people in Egypt are the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Nuragic people, a sea people who migrated to Egypt due to the rising of the eustatic level of the Atlantic Ocean, today called the Western Mediterranean.
ATTENTION, I AM CREATING THIS ARTICLE, WHICH IS GETTING LONGER AND LONGER. CHECK BACK FOR UPDATES
The Jewish people in Egypt around the year 1200 BC are the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Nuragic people, one of the various sea peoples mentioned in official historical, archaeological and literary sources, who migrated to Egypt due to the rising of the eustatic level of the Atlantic Ocean, today called the Western Mediterranean.
The Bible is the story of the Nuragic Jewish people who fled from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block while there was a significant rise in the eustatic level. Fearing that they would all drown, they decided to leave for the East, and they reached the coasts of Egypt. There are two scientific and archaeological proofs: the inscriptions in the temple of Medinet Habu, and the stele of Merenptah, both archaeological documents, the temple even building construction proof. The Nuragic people were called by the Egyptians the people of ISRI, from the Stele of Merenptah, from which the people of Israel. The Nuragic Jewish people were looking for a Promised Land because their original land, the Sardinian-Corsican geological block was about to be submerged by the rise in the eustatic sea level of the ancient Atlantic Ocean that today we call on the geographical maps “Western Mediterranean Sea”. The Sardinian-Corsican block was called Atlantis by the Egyptians, we know this from the speech of Sonchis of Sais to Solon around 590 BC.
Now I will try to prove it with scientific and literary evidence.
A scientific theory must make predictions: I predict that in the Neolithic town of Serra Linta and the Necropolis of Iloi they will find writings in proto-Hebrew. The reason is that if the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean-Nuragic people are the Jews, that is, the people of the Atlantean sea of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block that then migrated to the East, it means that the Hebrew language is the Nuragic language or a subsequent linguistic mutation, so it is possible that proto-Hebrew was born in one of the places of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block. The discovery of finds in proto-Hebrew would be an indirect confirmation of the validity of my scientific statements, to be considered hypotheses for you readers, to be considered statements by Luigi Usai, the writer, because he firmly believes in all this. It is not a coincidence.
Let’s start with the list of possible tests with sometimes inverted logical operation.
Are there no Sardinian genetic markers in the Jewish population? The Merneptah Stele specifically states that Isrir or Israel was “wasted and his seed is no more”. So it is possible that the Pharaoh had the penises of all males amputated, as had already happened on other occasions with the Libyans. Sardinian genetic markers represent an interesting field of study. Sardinia, with its history and geographical isolation, has a unique genetic heritage. Here is some interesting information: Jewish origins in Sardinia Jews have had a documented presence in Sardinia since the 1st century AD. Jewish catacombs have been found in Sant’Antioco and typically Jewish artifacts have been discovered in several excavation sites on the island. Jews and Sardinians lived in prosperity and harmony, even intermarrying. Genetic testing for Jewish ancestry: iGENEA offers DNA tests to find out if you have Jewish roots. These tests analyze specific genetic characteristics and compare the DNA profile with a large database of people. It is not possible to definitively divide the Jewish people through DNA analysis, but a genealogical test can confirm a Jewish origin.Jewish ethnic groups: Ashkenazim: Jews from the West and the East, with a common religious tradition and culture. Sephardim: Descendants of the Jews who settled after the expulsion from the Iberian Peninsula. Levites: They take their name from their ancestor Levi, one of the twelve sons of Jacob. Cohen: Biblical name of the priestly caste in Judaism. In short, every Sardinian has Jewish blood in their veins, and the genetic history of the island is fascinating and complex. Compatible chronology: The Nuragic civilization developed between 1700 and 700 BC, a period that coincides with the biblical story of the ancient patriarchs and their migration to Egypt. Common symbols: Some Nuragic carvings feature symbols that could be interpreted as proto-Hebrew. Unleavened bread (matzah in Hebrew) in Sardinian is called matzosu (I have the qualification of Baker A1 with 10 years of discontinuous experience in Sardinia and Veneto, so I am qualified to speak about this specific topic). Toponymy: Sardinia preserves toponyms such as “Nur” and “Nora” from which the Hebrew root “Ner” could derive, with the meaning of “light”: these would therefore be Semitic words not vocalized when written, which would have been vocalized differently in the following centuries, with the autonomous development of the Hebrew language in a place distant from its origin. Names of the Deities: in Egypt the Goddess Amenti, linked to funeral rites. S’ammentu in Sardinian means remembrance, memory, recovery, discovery. It is a word that has a strong cultural and historical value, and that has been used as the title of a magazine1 and a poem2 dedicated to Sardinia and its traditions.1: AMMENTU – Historical and Archival Bulletin of the Mediterranean and the Americas 2: Ammentu (innanti a su retrattu) Egyptologists do not study the Sardinian language among the mandatory languages to become experts in Egyptology, so not knowing Sardinian, they cannot understand or translate the inscriptions correctly and according to the right interpretation. In fact, the Sardinians and the Sardinian culture do not appear in the texts that speak of Ancient Egypt, with devastating consequences for the interpretation of ancient sources. The testimony of some ancient authors, such as Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, Strabo, who speak of a migration of peoples from the western Mediterranean to Egypt, identified with the peoples of the sea, including the Shardana, who according to Usai would be the same Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans. The archaeological finds that show the presence of Sardinian-Corsican populations in ancient Egypt are removed or expelled from the territory. For example, all the bronzes linked to the mummy Usai that are in the Museum of Bologna are real Nuragic bronzes, but made in Egypt. These elements are disturbing, because the official incorrect version on ancient Egypt does not mention Sardis at all, indeed, it probably does not even mention them, therefore these archaeological finds are calmly left at the Archaeological Museum of Bologna, where they are much closer physically to the Sardinian Nuragic bronzes and do not cause a stir or fear. But if they were in Cairo, some scholar might wonder if there are relationships between the Sardinian Nuragic bronzes and the Egyptian ones, creating problems in the possible ancient historical interpretations. We have a lot of evidence that the Egyptians had been in Sardinia since the sixth century BC, so it is impossible that they did not know about the Nuragic Bronzes… indeed, now, with hindsight, we wonder how it is possible that experts and archaeologists did not realize all these impressive “coincidences”… We have in fact the Nuragic bronze of the God BES in Cairo Online Collection – Statuette of the God Bes (museoegizio.it) Perhaps it would be a good idea to delve deeper into these cultural ties and review the texts that talk about them? It could be assumed that the Jewish people in Egypt around the year 1200 BC were the Nuragic Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean people, one of the various sea peoples mentioned in official historical, archaeological and literary sources. According to the writer Dr. Luigi Usai, the Nuragic people would have migrated to Egypt due to the rising of the eustatic level of the Atlantic Ocean, today called the Western Mediterranean. The Bible is the story of the Nuragic-Jewish people who fled from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block while this phenomenon was occurring. It is possible that the Nuragic Jewish people were looking for a Promised Land because their original land was about to be submerged by the sea: in fact, they could not know that in the future the eustatic rise would stop and two plateaus of Atlantis would remain above the water’s surface, later called Ichnussa and Sandaliotis as a mockery, since God had crushed Atlantis with his foot or his sandal, and after having removed it, only the land where he had placed his foot remained (this is Luigi Usai’s interpretation of the toponymy Ichnussa and Sandaliotis). The Nuragic people were called by the Egyptians the people of ISRI, from the Stele of Merenptah1, from which the people of Israel2.1: The Stele of Merenptah is a monument erected by the pharaoh Merenptah in the 13th century BC, which reports his victories against the peoples of the sea and other enemies. Among these, the ISRI people are mentioned, which some identify with the people of Israel, but which others believe to be another people of the sea. See Merenptah Stele. 2: The name Israel derives from the Hebrew Yisra’el, which means “he who fights with God”. According to the Bible, this name was given to Jacob, the patriarch of the Jews, after his encounter with an angel. See Israel. Precisely for these reasons, the name of the Nuragic people would be Ysri, or “He who Fights”. This scientific data from the Merenptah Stele coincides with the statement of the Priest Sonchis of Sais to Solon, when he tells him that the people of Atlantis were a warrior people: the scientific data from many sources are perfectly consistent, cross-confirming the validity of the statements. The proto-Jewish Nuragic people were a warrior people as said by Sonchis of Sais and as certified by the Merenptah Stele. Moses is a Sardinian Corsican Atlantean name; the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean-Nuragic people who migrated to Egypt gave the name Moses to a child; Moses was placed in a papyrus basket, or “de papperi” in the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Nuragic Campidanese and Sulcitan current language; “papperi” means paper in Atlantean Semitic syllabic agglutinative ergative current Sardinian, and in the Atlantean colonizations, the Atlantean people also taught the Sicilians this word, which they still use today to call the papyrus plant with the name of “Pappera” in a Sicilian dialect variant. The origin of this word is Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Nuragic Semitic syllabic ergative agglutinative (I know, you are forced to go and study linguistics because you have not understood anything: don’t worry, not even the greatest experts in the world in linguistics know this information, which I hope will become the object of serious studies by professionals in the sector, who will certainly be able to provide new knowledge and more timely and precise information). In Sardinia there is an archaeological city called Bithia: you can find everything here https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bithia_(sito_archeologico). The daughter of the pharaoh who found the “de papperi” basket with Moses inside was called Bithia. Bithia was the name of an Egyptian princess, daughter of Ramses II, who according to Jewish tradition adopted Moses. See Bithia. Moses goes up the mountain to speak with God, who does not exist. On the mountain he asks God, who does not exist, what he should say to the Jewish people, and God told him to say “I am”. Now, if we read “I am” in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Nuragic agglutinative ergative Semitic syllabic language, the word “I am”, today is said: “Seu Deu”. I therefore translate the biblical text into the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean language in its Sardinian-Campidanese and Sulcitan variant spoken today: “Si mi domandanta chini esti Deu, itta di deppu nai?” And God answers: “Deu seu Deu”, or “God is I”. The play on words is understood by any Sardinian-Campidanese and Sulcitan of today, as Deu means both “God” and “I”. The problem, a very serious one, is that in schools all over the world we teach Latin, Greek, and hundreds of other languages EXCEPT SARDINIAN, which is considered a language of such low importance and of such low rank that it is not even taught in Sardinia itself! Incredible, but it is true: do some research by coming to Sardinia and asking around, even on the internet, and you will discover that it is true. It almost seems that we Sardinians should BE ASHAMED OF THIS EXTRAORDINARY AND WONDERFUL LANGUAGE. The consequences of this statement are very serious: when they ask Moses who God is, he would have answered, according to this theory of the writer Luigi Usai, “Chini est Deu? DEU, SEU!”, that is: Who is God? I, Am! Moses would therefore have imposed himself, according to my theory, as the ONLY GOD of the proto-Hebrew Nuragic people in the desert, effectively inventing monotheism. The invention of monotheism by Moses I discovered online that has already been hypothesized by other scholars, so the credit for this discovery does NOT go to the writer. Here we limit ourselves to giving the explanation of the entire logical flow of semantic, pragmatic and semiotic data concerning the invention of monotheism by the murderer named Moses. Yes: Moses was a murderer: he killed an Egyptian because he was bullying a Jew, this fact is documented by the biblical texts themselves. In the Book of Exodus, the episode in which Moses kills the Egyptian guard is described in chapter 2, verse 12.
Moses was a murderer and a violent man: the people of Atlantis were a warrior people; the people of Ysri have a name that translated means “Warriors, Wrestlers, Those who fight”, in fact the name of the people of Ysraele means “Ysra El”, or “He who fights with God (EL)”. So the proto-Hebrew Nuragic people of Ysri are warriors like the warriors of Mont’e Prama, and they could probably be related: these statues could even be the representation of the ancient Hebrew patriarchs. The verse of the Bible that tells that Moses killed an Egyptian is Exodus 2:12. The text says: “He looked this way and that, and when he saw that there was no man, he killed the Egyptian, and hid him in the sand.”1 This episode occurred when Moses, raised in the court of the Pharaoh, realized that he belonged to the people of the Hebrews, oppressed by the Egyptians. One day, when Moses saw an Egyptian beating a Hebrew, he came to his brother’s defense and killed the attacker. However, the matter was discovered and Moses had to flee Egypt to save his life. 23 Moses killed the Egyptian out of a desire for justice, but he was not yet ready to free his people from slavery. Only after meeting God in the burning bush did Moses receive the mission to challenge Pharaoh and lead the Hebrews to the promised land. 4.1: Exodus 2:12 – Commentary, explanation and verse-by-verse study – Bíblia Plus 2: Moses flees from Egypt | Bible story – JW.ORG 3: The atrocities of the Bible | UAAR 4: The ten plagues in Egypt | BibleviewThe Bible verse that tells us that Moses was violent and angry, to the point that he broke the tablets of the laws because the people were worshiping the golden calf is Exodus 32:19. The text says: “When Moses came near the camp and saw the calf and the dancing, his anger burned, and he threw the tablets out of his hands and broke them at the foot of the mountain.”1This incident occurred after Moses had gone up Mount Sinai to receive from God the two tablets of the Testimony, with the Ten Commandments. While Moses was away, the people asked Aaron to make them a god to worship, and Aaron made a golden calf out of their ornaments. God was angry with the people, and Moses interceded for him. When Moses came down from the mountain and saw the idolatry of the people, he became furious and destroyed the tablets of the law, symbol of the covenant between God and Israel2 [3][3].Moses broke the tablets of the law to show his indignation and disappointment towards the people, who had violated the first and second commandments. Later, Moses had to return to Mount Sinai to receive new tablets from God, with the same words as the first4.1: Exodus 32:19 – Commentary, explanation and study verse by verse – Bíblia Plus 2: The Golden Calf, the idol created by Aaron | Bibleview [3][3]: Exodus 32 CEI – 5. THE GOLDEN CALF AND – Bible Gateway 4: Delivery of the Tablets of the Law – Vatican Museums The Sardinian Campidanese and Sulcitana linguistics provide for syllabification in the Semitic style, as does Sumerian, and in prehistory I noticed that it makes no difference whether you write with a consonant or the same double consonant, so for example, in prehistory it made no difference whether you wrote Sinnai or Sinai. Today the double consonants make no difference, but in ancient times they didn’t, and even recently. I’ll give an example for those who aren’t Sardinian, so they can understand. As a child, my “diddino” (godfather) asked me: “Do you want a GELLATTO?”. I was amazed. I thought: why does it say GELLATTO? It means “gelato”. I then realized that in Gonnesa there was a linguistic consonant doubling typical of the Gonnesina linguistic dialect, that is, of the town of Gonnesa in Sardinia (sorry for the repetition, I hope it increases clarity). This fact amused me a lot: I didn’t know this linguistic phenomenon existed, so to make fun of an inhabitant of the Sardinian village of Gonnesa it was enough to pronounce any word with the doubling, for example I could say to my cousins: “Do you want a PANNINNO?” to ask if he wanted a sandwich filled with sliced meat. It was a funny thing, which I forgot and put in the drawer of my memory. Until I read the Old Testament, Exodus, of the biblical Pentateuch. In Sardinia there is a geographical location called SINNAI. Moses leads the people into the Sinai desert (I have just explained that the Sardinian Campidanese and Sulcitana linguistics foresee that Sinai and Sinnai are the same word), and Moses climbs Mount Sinai to take the tablets of the 10 commandments. In the nuraghe of Santa Barbara in Macomer, even today, a torello, or calf, of light appears at the base of the nuraghe. This was part of the Nuragic religion. God was the light of the world, inside the nuraghe. And the Atlantean Nuragic Sardinian Bull God sent his own son, the calf of light, to be sacrificed for the Nuragic Sardinian Corsican Atlantean people. Many years later Jesus will say: I am the light of the world. In another passage, in the Bible it is written: God loved the world so much that he sent his son to be sacrificed for the salvation of men. After about 1300 years in Egypt, the Nuragic Jewish religion changed and the one sent to save the people is no longer a bull of light through the nuraghe, because in the Sinai desert where the Nuragic Jewish people lived for decades there were no stones to create nuraghe; so slowly the Nuragic-Jewish religion changed and the one sacrificed was no longer the calf of light of the nuraghe, it was not the son of the Bull God, but it was the son of the monotheistic God Yahweh, who however still remained “light of the world” as he was the light of the world inside the nuraghe, and then, in the passage to Egypt, in the form of the God Ra, that is, the Sun God.
There is also another bull of light, the “bull of light” of the Nuraghe Santa Barbara, Villanova Truschedu. Bull of light – calf of light in the Sardinian Nuraghe El Ahwat is an archaeological site located in Israel, in the Manasse region, about 16 km east of the city of Caesarea1. The site was discovered in 1992 by the archaeologist Adam Zertal1. According to some studies, it dates back to a period between the Bronze Age and the Iron Age1. The main structure of El Ahwat is a citadel surrounded by stone walls, inside which there are structures that recall the Nuragic towers of Sardinia2. Zertal hypothesized that these towers were built by the Shardana people, identifiable with the Nuragic people2. This theory is based on the fact that the Nuragic towers in that historical period, between the Bronze Age and the Iron Age, were present only in Sardinia2. However, this hypothesis has been the subject of debate among scholars. Some, such as archaeologist Israel Finkelstein, argue that El Ahwat should be dated about 100 years later, to the mid-11th century BC. 1 Others, such as Eric Cline and David O’Connor, have criticized Zertal’s hypothesis, stating that “so far, however, no identifiable Shardana pottery has been found at this or any other site in the region, and the interpretation of El-Ahwat’s architecture remains an open question.” 1 Despite the controversy, the discovery of El Ahwat has opened new horizons in the study of the connections between Mediterranean civilizations in antiquity. Now, the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean paradigm of Luigi Usai states that these towns had been built by other peoples of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean sea who had migrated from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block towards Palestine to save themselves from the possible sinking of Atlantis, that is, the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently half-submerged in the ancient Atlantic Ocean today called the Western Mediterranean: those peoples believed that the entire Sardinian-Corsican geological block was “sinking”, not only the coastal margin, but everything. So they migrated and founded many colonies in Palestine and Lebanon. When many years later they discovered that there were two plateaus left out of the water, they returned exactly like the Greek “Nostoi”, to their land, to gather information, but by then they were already living in Palestine and Lebanon and other places, so they decided to trade with those peoples who had remained in the plateaus of Atlantis, today called Sardinia and Corsica. The Nuragic people had sacred water wells, built in a particular way, but they also had another type of sources called Mitza: Mitza de sa Figu, Dolianova (SU), Mitza Sa Domu e Sa Ni’, Villasalto (SU), Mitza Fanebas: https://www.sardegnasentieri.it/da-vedere/mitza-fanebas. The Jewish Nuragic people, peoples of the sea who then settled in the Sinai desert and passed to the monotheistic religion through Moses, also have the sacred well but it has changed and is no longer called Mitza, but Mitzveh. They have only slightly changed the linguistic value of the name of the original sacred well of the Sardinian Atlantean course geological block, but the toponymy has remained almost unchanged over the millennia, it has gone from Mitza to Mitzveh. This is extraordinary because if the writer, Luigi Usai, who understands nothing about linguistics has come to discover these similarities-coincidences, it means that an expert linguist could find hundreds of them, if he started working on these very interesting topics. If the Jewish people were a migration of Nuragic sea peoples, this information could advance knowledge by hundreds of man years in a few months! The writer, Luigi Usai, thinks that this topic is worth addressing. Jewish presence in Sardinia: The Jews have had a documented presence in Sardinia since the 1st century AD9101112. The catacombs of Sant’Antioco in Sardinia contain Jewish inscriptions dating back to the 4th and 5th centuries139. Among the literary sources, the biblical one in Exodus 3:7 The Lord said: “I have seen the misery of my people who are in Egypt and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters; I know their sufferings. 8I have come down to deliver them from the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land to a good and spacious land, to a land flowing with milk and honey, to the place of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorite, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. 9Behold, the cry of the Israelites has reached me, and I myself have seen how the Egyptians oppress them. Now I will try to show you what it means: the Nuragic-proto-Hebrew people migrated to the land of Egypt and were rejected by Pharaoh and his army. Moreover, the Nuragic proto-Hebrew word Ysri we have shown in this documentation that means: He who Fights, that is, the Ysri are a people of warriors. This people, after having experienced that in Egypt they were oppressed, as Exodus 3:7 says, then matured the thought of leaving towards the other peoples of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean sea who had already migrated to Palestine, and they are listed: among others, the Hittites, the Amorites, who therefore were also of Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean origin, that is, they came from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block before it sank and which was called Atlantis by Sonchis of Sais. So the proto-Jewish Nuragic people decided to migrate again to reach the other Sardinian-Corsican migrations; however, a very serious problem arose: when they reached them, these proto-Jewish Nuragic people had a new monotheistic religion invented by Moses, and they felt the need to “convert” the other Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean Nuragic people who had already arrived in those territories, and who had therefore maintained their Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean religion because they had had no reason to change it! Hence, WARS OF RELIGION! These discoveries are extraordinary. Even today, in 2024, we have WARS OF RELIGION, because even today people try to demonstrate that “the Bull God” is stronger than the God of Moses who said “DEU SEU DEU”. In this sense, these new discoveries have a very important and precious anthropological and psychological meaning, as well as linguistic, historical, archaeological, geographical, scientific, literary… Among the peoples who surrounded the Nuragic Jews, peoples of the sea, there is the character of Goliath, defeated as well known by David: it is the story of David and Goliath. Now Goliath was a giant. And Sardinia, even today, has hundreds and hundreds of structures called “giants’ tombs”. We are not interested here in knowing whether they were really people with an alteration of GH, or Growth Factor, or growth hormone: we are interested in the fact that the themes discussed, as already happened for the Sardinian Mitza and the Jewish-Nuragic Mitzveh, return again and even seem to have HUNDREDS of archaeological evidence that testify to similar topics. The Nuragic village of El Ahwat was found in Manasseh. “The Tribe of Manasseh is one of the twelve tribes of Israel, descending from the patriarch of the same name.” (phrase taken from Wikipedia). So it is extremely probable that this Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migration coming from the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, where the Nuragic population was convinced that the island was sinking due to a rising of the eustatic level, was an integral part of Manasseh or one of the 12 tribes of Israel. Why this? Because as I have already tried to explain on this web page, the people of Israel were the Nuragic Sardinians, but not only the Sardinians but also the other populations, unknown to science at the moment but reported by the site www.atlantisfound.it, who came from the paleocoasts of the Sardinian-Corsican batholith. Luigi Usai, the writer, does not have the skills at the moment to go into more detailed analysis, so he has decided to share this information with the scientific world so that REAL experts, more capable than he, the writer, are able to analyze and understand the complexity that is emerging from these analyses of antiquity: if the Jewish people were the Nuragic people, it means that the Bible is a text of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean literature of the Nuragic people of the ISRI cited in the Stele of Merenptah, part of the very famous Sea Peoples cited in literature and archaeology and never fully understood, which Luigi Usai, the writer, states are migrations coming from all the paleocoasts of the current Mediterranean, which were more or less rapidly submerged by more or less violent rises in the eustatic sea level, perhaps due to repeated Meltwater Pulses, perhaps even some not yet known to science at the moment, given that these scientific topics are not completely studied in full. It is possible that there is still some scientific information missing that would have helped other scholars before the writer to make much more in-depth, correct and precise hypotheses. In Israel there are traces of the Nuragic civilization: I invite readers to read this very interesting article that offers more details about the content of this web page. The President of the Sardinia Region, Christian Solinas, received the Israeli ambassador to Italy, Dror Eydar, at Villa Devoto1. Archaeological finds have been announced in the area of Mount Carmel that would demonstrate the presence of elements of Nuragic civilization23. This discovery highlights the role of the Sardinians and the Nuragic people in the history of the peoples of the Mediterranean1. Momo Zucca, professor at the University of Sassari, better identified these discoveries in Upper Galilee4. In 2021, in the port of Cesarea, two Sardinian lead ingots were found5. The fortress of El Ahwat may have been the fortress of Sisera, chief Shardana, a biblical character known for his military skills6. The connection between Shardana, Sardinia and the Sea Peoples could have great relevance, as it would bring the Nuragic people from prehistory to history7.
The Usai Mummy: an Egyptian mummy, the Usai Mummy, is preserved in the museum of Bologna.
As you can well understand, since the writer is called Luigi Usai, the fact that there is a “Mummy Usai” strikes him deeply, since the surname Usai is exclusively Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean in the whole world: it means that in all, the only people who have the surname USAI originated in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block or have a parent or ancestor called USAI, then emigrated throughout the world. Since the archaeological world has not understood anything about why this mummy had a Sardinian surname, they have “isolated” it by making it meet a different end compared to all the other archaeological and historical finds. Indeed, if you contacted the Museum of Bologna, they would tell you that there is no certainty that the mummy USAI has connections with the surname USAI, because to date there is no archaeological evidence that demonstrates this relationship. In fact, this extraordinary Usai Mummy is not in Cairo, along with all the other material, but it had its own history separate from the other finds, and yet these are authentic, true historical finds. Why? Because the presence of the Sardinian surname USAI among all the other Egyptian finds in Cairo is not convenient, it is inconvenient. Better to take it away and “hide” it – “isolate” it somewhere, in a place that seems far from its original places: better to put it much closer to Sardinia, where the surname USAI no longer causes a stir. In reality there is evidence that the Usai Mummy comes from Sardinia, in fact inside its sarcophagus the Deity Imentet or Amenti, which means West, was engraved: this is the way in which the ancient Egyptians were leaving evidence, inside the sarcophagus, that the person who was inside came from the West, that is from the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian block, and, after its partial semi-submersion, from the current Sardinia. The archaeological world sees the Goddess Imentet or Amentit and recognizes her, but does not connect with the fact that in the West of Egypt there is Sardinia, where the USAI of the whole world lived, before the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean migrations brought this surname around the world. I am very lucky to have this precious surname myself. Furthermore, the Goddess Amenti is nothing more than the personification of the Sardinian word Ammentu: S’Ammentu is The Memory. But Egyptologists do not study the Sardinian language, which is not studied almost anywhere in the world. We have more than 7000 nuraghi built and created by the Atlantean people of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block before it was submerged, but the Sardinian language does not seem to interest anyone: it is an absurd situation. I repeat: we have a Parthenon in Greece, but in Sardinia more than 7000 nuraghe, and more importance is given to the only Parthenon… Why do we study ancient Greek, ancient Latin, modern Greek, Aramaic, cuneiform but no study is done on the language of the Sardinian people and civilization? To understand how serious it is, imagine if we had reserved the same treatment to the hieroglyphic language or to cuneiform or ancient Greek, and you will understand the cultural devastation that would result if this had happened. It is a shameful situation.
The Mummy of Usai is a precious testimony to the culture and religion of ancient Egypt, which had a strong influence on other civilizations of the Mediterranean, including the Nuragic one of Sardinia. The mummy belongs to a man named Usai, son of Nekhet and Heriubastet, who lived in the city of Thebes during the XXVI dynasty (664 – 525 BC), a period of political and cultural rebirth of Egypt after the end of the Assyrian occupation. Now, a scholar with a shred of common sense understands that Bastet is an Egyptian deity, so it was added in an agglutinative manner to the surname of USAI’s father. So, to know the real surname of the father of the Mummy Usai, or of the possible Priest Usai, it must be noted that the father was called HERIU – BASTET, or HERIU, therefore the surname of Usai’s father in Egypt was ERIU, which is still a Sardinian surname today, and any linguist and glottologist in the world will be able to confirm that the process of losing the initial H is a very normal phenomenon in linguistics. So Mr. Usai, now called Mummy Usai, was the son of Mr. Eriu, another Sardinian surname in Egypt Egyptianized into Heriubastet with agglutinative linguistic functions, as the Semitic ergative Atlantean language is agglutinative. How is it possible that the scientific world, scientists from all over the world, have not noticed? How is it possible that no one in the world has seriously asked themselves, looking for massive and solid evidence, why Mr. Eriu and Usai were in Egypt and were casting bronzes like the Nuragics? Usai was probably a priest or a high-ranking official, as suggested by his two sarcophagi, an internal one of anthropomorphic shape and an external one in the shape of a box with corner pillars and a barrel-shaped lid. The sarcophagi are richly decorated with religious scenes and texts, which invoke the protection of the deities and eternal life for the deceased. The mummy and the sarcophagi were purchased in 1824 by Count Luigi Ferdinando Marsili, a Bolognese scholar and collector, who donated them to the Museo Civico Archeologico in Bologna, where they are still on display.
Mummification was a fundamental practice for the Egyptians, who believed that the body had to be preserved to allow the soul to survive in the afterlife. The mummification process involved several stages: washing the body with water and wine; removing the brain through the nostrils and the viscera through an incision on the left side; dehydrating the body with natron salts for 40 days; anointing with perfumed oils and resins; wrapping with linen bandages, between which magical amulets were inserted to protect the body from any dangers. The mummy of Usai was subjected to an X-ray, which revealed the presence of a net of faience beads, a colored glass paste, which covered the chest and abdomen of the deceased. This net was a symbol of rebirth and regeneration, and was intended to recreate the skin of the god Osiris, the lord of the underworld. The X-ray also showed that Usai’s viscera had been removed and wrapped in a linen wrapper, which was placed between the deceased’s legs. This was a way to preserve the viscera, which were considered essential parts of the body, and to prevent them from decomposing.
The Mummy of Usai is a work of great historical and artistic value, which allows us to better understand the Egyptian civilization and its relationship with other Mediterranean cultures. The mummy is also a work that requires constant care and maintenance, to preserve it from degradation and environmental aggression. The Museo Civico Archeologico of Bologna has started a restoration project of the mummy and the sarcophagi, which includes securing the most fragile parts, cleaning the surfaces, removing harmful substances, and creating new display cases, which guarantee better conservation and enjoyment of the work. The restoration is also an opportunity to deepen the study of the mummy and the sarcophagi, through new scientific and technical analyses, which can provide further information on the life and death of Usai.
Usai’s mummy is accompanied by a group of 11 bronzes of Egyptian deities, which are part of his funerary equipment. In practice, we have the presence of the technique of “Nuragic bronzes”, but when archaeologists find them in Sardinia, then they call them “Nuragic bronzes”, while if they find them in Egypt made by Nuragic people who were slaves or guests in Egypt, then they just call them “bronzes”, and they do not understand that it is Nuragic technology and technique exported to Egypt. It is obvious that in Egypt, under the abundance of pharaonic wealth, the bronzes could be made with richer, different materials, and above all with those accessible to those who had the approval of the Pharaoh. Archaeologists cannot expect the bronze founder USAI to say to the Pharaoh: “Wait, Pharaoh, I’m going back to Sardinia to get the Sardinian materials, so in the future archaeologists will be able to understand that I am truly Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean and not just any Egyptian…”. Sometimes the reasoning of scholars is really crazy. Regarding the surname, no one realized that USAI is exclusively Atlantean, because Atlantis was considered a fairy tale: basically Plato, after a lifetime of very serious studies on all human knowledge, had gone mad and started telling lies just to pass the time, according to most of the world’s scholars. Think how intelligent Human Beings are. For this reason, we thank the world population of archaeologists for having given me the pleasure of pointing it out in person: Thank you, it’s a great satisfaction. These bronzes were purchased together with the mummy and the sarcophagi by Count Luigi Ferdinando Marsili in 1824, and donated to the Museo Civico Archeologico of Bologna1. The bronzes represent some of the main deities of the Egyptian pantheon, such as Osiris, Isis, Horus, Anubis, Thot, Hathor and Bes2. The bronzes had a protective and symbolic function for the deceased, and reflect his religious devotion3.
If you want to know more about the bronzes and the mummy of Usai, you can visit the Museo Civico Archeologico of Bologna, where they are exhibited in the Egyptian section, or the Museo della Città di Mantua, where they will be on loan for five years starting from September 20211.
Christianization of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean deity of Poseidon by Moses in the land of Egypt: the Nuragic-Atlantean people of the Sardinian-Corsican island of Atlantis, that is, the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged under the ancient Atlantic Ocean, today called the Western Mediterranean Sea. The Byzantines tried to Christianize the Domus de Janas by trying to transform some of them into churches: a first example, to begin with, we can see it in the Domus de Janas “The tomb of the chief” in the Necropolis of Sant’Andrea Priu (Bonorva), where the structure was re-frescoed in an attempt to transform it into a Catholic church. On this same website, I had discussed the Christianization of the figure of Medusa. When Moses climbs Mount SINAI-SINNAI (in Sardinian linguistics, in prehistory there is no difference between single and double consonants, as still happens today in the Sardinian spoken in Gonnesa in Sardinia), he engraves the “tablets of the laws”, that is, two steles containing the 10 commandments; in Sardinia we still have examples of these customs: in fact we have the Stele of Nora, fortunately very famous, preserved in the Museum of Cagliari, and which I was lucky enough to see with my own eyes. I wouldn’t be so surprised if in the future it was discovered that the translation of the Stele of Nora is half of the 10 Jewish-Nuragic commandments. Moses is faced with a huge problem: the Sardinian-Corsican-Nuragic-proto-Jewish people are too tied to the religion practiced in Atlantis: venerating the Bull God, the calf of light that appeared at the base of the nuraghe at the spring solstice etc., so he has to find a way to explain that the figure of their God Poseidon was wrong. So what does he do? He transforms the God Poseidon into the BAD MONSTER: Poseidon becomes Satan! The trident of the God Poseidon becomes the Pitchfork of the Devil-Satan; the horns of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean nuragics become the Horns of Satan, the Devil becomes Horned; but there was a very serious problem: Poseidon was the God of Water, God of the Sea. In the desert this was a right thing, in fact the people in the desert died of thirst, precisely the Nuragics who for a whole life had dug Sacred Wells that they called Mitza and in Sardinia they are still called that, but in the desert, over the hundreds of years, linguistics has taken its course and the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Nuragic Mitza has become the Nuragic-Jewish Mitzvah: see Mitzvah on Wikipedia for further information. It is amazing how no one has ever noticed these things until 2024. There are many scholars who have noticed and highlighted similarities, linguistic, historical, archaeological, but until today I, the writer Luigi Usai, have never read all this information one after the other in this way, which RADICALLY TRANSFORMS THE WAY IN WHICH ANTIQUITY IS LOOKED AT AND PERCEIVED! Returning to Poseidon-Satan, God of the Sea – God of the Underworld, we have underlined the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean cult of the Waters, which in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Basque language is currently called UR, and in fact the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans who migrated under the name of Sumerians, landed in Palestine and Lebanon and went in search of water, and when they found it, they founded a city that was called UR or Water in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean language.UR is the city where the Bible says Abraham lived. So Abraham is a Sardinian Corsican Atlantean patriarch from the city of UR next to the Persian Gulf, which provides UR, that is Water, for the people. We have already seen the importance of water for the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans, in fact in Sulcis, the capital of Atlantis, we have the ancient places Acquacadda, Acqua Callentis, S’acqua callenti de susu, S’acqua callenti de basciu, the Castle of Acquafredda, and in the Middle Ages under the castle there was the medieval town of Acquafredda, and so on: water was very important and sacred for the Atlanteans, and in fact Poseidon placed two sources in the capital of Atlantis, “one of cold water and one of hot water”. So Abraham was from UR, WATER, next to the Persian Gulf. And the Atlanteans also founded URUK. And in Sardinia there still exists today URAS, and the Nuraghe URAKI, clear linguistic references to UR, that is Water in our proto-Atlantean language spoken in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and in Sardinia the surname Acquas still exists, confirming all this, which therefore must be very ancient. To affirm that Satan was the God of the Underworld and the God of Water did not scare the proto-Hebrew Nuragic people, because these people lived in the fiery, very hot desert. They were therefore forced to transform Satan God of Water into Satan God of Fire: therefore the eternal punishment was precisely to burn in hell, as the people already burned in the fiery desert of Sinai-Sinnai (Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean toponymy). Here then is the mythological mutation of the God Poseidon of water, with the trident and horns, into Satan God of Fire, with the pitchfork and horns. Poseidon became Satan. This is why they speak of Baal or Ba’al: Baal will become Bull in English, that is, the Bull God of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean religion as narrated by Sonchis of Sais to Solon in 590 BC and then reported in the works of Timaeus and Critias, believed to be two semi-fairytale, invented and mythological stories, according to most scientists in the world these Platonic texts would have only had the purpose of illustrating Plato’s political doctrines, as if poor Plato did not have sufficient culture to do so without the need to invent lies. Really interesting, from a psychological and sociological and anthropological point of view, to address the reasoning made by the so-called “World Scientific Community”. There would be much to study for centuries, what causes these forms of reasoning among human beings, it could even become a very interesting “case study”.S’acqua callenti de susu, S’acqua callenti de basciu, the Castle of Acquafredda, and in the Middle Ages under the castle there was the medieval town of Acquafredda, and so on: water was very important and sacred for the Atlanteans, and in fact Poseidon placed two sources in the capital of Atlantis, “one of cold water and one of hot water”. So Abraham was from UR, WATER, next to the Persian Gulf. And the Atlanteans also founded URUK. And in Sardinia there still exists today URAS, and the Nuraghe URAKI, clear linguistic references to UR, or Water in our proto-Atlantean language spoken in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and in Sardinia the surname Acquas still exists, confirming all this, which therefore must be very ancient. To affirm that Satan was the God of the Underworld and the God of Water did not scare the proto-Jewish Nuragic people, because these people lived in the fiery, very hot desert. They were then forced to transform Satan God of Water into Satan God of Fire: therefore the eternal punishment was precisely to burn in hell, as the people were already burning in the fiery desert of Sinai-Sinnai (Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean toponymy). Here then is the mythological mutation of the God Poseidon of water, with the trident and horns, into Satan God of Fire, with the pitchfork and horns. Poseidon became Satan. This is why they speak of Baal or Ba’al: Baal will become Bull in English, that is, the Bull God of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean religion as narrated by Sonchis of Sais to Solon in 590 BC and then reported in the works of Timaeus and Critias, believed to be two semi-fairytale, invented and mythological stories, according to most scientists in the world these Platonic texts would have only had the purpose of illustrating Plato’s political doctrines, as if poor Plato did not have sufficient culture to do so without the need to invent lies. Really interesting, from a psychological and sociological and anthropological point of view, to address the reasoning made by the so-called “World Scientific Community”. There would be much to study for centuries, what causes these forms of reasoning among human beings, it could even become a very interesting “case study”.S’acqua callenti de susu, S’acqua callenti de basciu, the Castle of Acquafredda, and in the Middle Ages under the castle there was the medieval town of Acquafredda, and so on: water was very important and sacred for the Atlanteans, and in fact Poseidon placed two sources in the capital of Atlantis, “one of cold water and one of hot water”. So Abraham was from UR, WATER, next to the Persian Gulf. And the Atlanteans also founded URUK. And in Sardinia there still exists today URAS, and the Nuraghe URAKI, clear linguistic references to UR, or Water in our proto-Atlantean language spoken in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and in Sardinia the surname Acquas still exists, confirming all this, which therefore must be very ancient. To affirm that Satan was the God of the Underworld and the God of Water did not scare the proto-Jewish Nuragic people, because these people lived in the fiery, very hot desert. They were then forced to transform Satan God of Water into Satan God of Fire: therefore the eternal punishment was precisely to burn in hell, as the people were already burning in the fiery desert of Sinai-Sinnai (Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean toponymy). Here then is the mythological mutation of the God Poseidon of water, with the trident and horns, into Satan God of Fire, with the pitchfork and horns. Poseidon became Satan. This is why they speak of Baal or Ba’al: Baal will become Bull in English, that is, the Bull God of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean religion as narrated by Sonchis of Sais to Solon in 590 BC and then reported in the works of Timaeus and Critias, believed to be two semi-fairytale, invented and mythological stories, according to most scientists in the world these Platonic texts would have only had the purpose of illustrating Plato’s political doctrines, as if poor Plato did not have sufficient culture to do so without the need to invent lies. Really interesting, from a psychological and sociological and anthropological point of view, to address the reasoning made by the so-called “World Scientific Community”. There would be much to study for centuries, what causes these forms of reasoning among human beings, it could even become a very interesting “case study”.To affirm that Satan was the God of the Underworld and the God of Water did not scare the proto-Jewish Nuragic people, because these people lived in the fiery, very hot desert. They were therefore forced to transform Satan God of Water into Satan God of Fire: therefore the eternal punishment was precisely to burn in hell, as the people already burned in the fiery desert of Sinai-Sinnai (Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean toponymy). Here then is the mythological mutation of the God Poseidon of water, with the trident and horns, into Satan God of Fire, with the pitchfork and horns. Poseidon became Satan. This is why they speak of Baal or Ba’al: Baal will become Bull in English, that is, the Bull God of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean religion as narrated by Sonchis of Sais to Solon in 590 BC and then reported in the works of Timaeus and Critias, believed to be two semi-fairytale, invented and mythological stories, according to most scientists in the world these Platonic texts would have only had the purpose of illustrating Plato’s political doctrines, as if poor Plato did not have sufficient culture to do so without the need to invent lies. Really interesting, from a psychological and sociological and anthropological point of view, to address the reasoning made by the so-called “World Scientific Community”. There would be much to study for centuries, what causes these forms of reasoning among human beings, it could even become a very interesting “case study”.To affirm that Satan was the God of the Underworld and the God of Water did not scare the proto-Jewish Nuragic people, because these people lived in the fiery, very hot desert. They were therefore forced to transform Satan God of Water into Satan God of Fire: therefore the eternal punishment was precisely to burn in hell, as the people already burned in the fiery desert of Sinai-Sinnai (Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean toponymy). Here then is the mythological mutation of the God Poseidon of water, with the trident and horns, into Satan God of Fire, with the pitchfork and horns. Poseidon became Satan. This is why they speak of Baal or Ba’al: Baal will become Bull in English, that is, the Bull God of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean religion as narrated by Sonchis of Sais to Solon in 590 BC and then reported in the works of Timaeus and Critias, believed to be two semi-fairytale, invented and mythological stories, according to most scientists in the world these Platonic texts would have only had the purpose of illustrating Plato’s political doctrines, as if poor Plato did not have sufficient culture to do so without the need to invent lies. Really interesting, from a psychological and sociological and anthropological point of view, to address the reasoning made by the so-called “World Scientific Community”. There would be much to study for centuries, what causes these forms of reasoning among human beings, it could even become a very interesting “case study”. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean language is of the Semitic agglutinative-ergative Atlantean type, therefore as a Semitic language it is consonantal with suppression of vowels in the written form. In the ancient Atlantean language, as I have shown in other points of my writings (I invite the reader to document themselves online) the concept of double is usually vowel, but not written. In fact we find the town of SINNAI in Sardinia and the desert of SINAI and Mount SINAI where Moses received the tablets of the laws, or the 10 commandments. So for example, the Sardinian wine cannonau should be written cnn (the doubled letter “n” is only pronounced but not written). The Jews settled in the land of Canaan, where we immediately notice the vowel doubling typical of Semitic languages in “double a”, which was taught by the Etruscans, descendants of the Villanovans, to the ancient Romans through the concepts of “short and long” used in Latin metrics to create pentameters, hexameters and so on. Canaan should be written cnn exactly like Cannonau. Probably the word is exactly the same, but over the millennia it has been vocalized differently. The primary source on the origin of the Jewish people is the Bible, the sacred book of the Jews and Christians. The Bible tells the story of the ancestors of the Jews, the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, who lived in Canaan around the 18th century BC. The Bible also tells of the slavery of the Jews in Egypt, their liberation by Moses, and their return to the promised land1. However, the Bible is not a reliable historical source, especially for the most ancient phases of Jewish history. In fact, the Bible contains many legendary, mythical and theological elements, which are not confirmed by other sources or archaeological finds2. The first mention of Israel as a people in a source outside the Bible is the Merenptah Stele, an Egyptian monument dating back to the 13th century BC3. History and archaeology tell us that Jewish culture developed in the area that includes present-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, in a society of semi-nomadic shepherds, who spoke a Semitic language and lived divided into clans and tribes. 4 Between the 10th and 6th centuries BC, the Jews formed two kingdoms, Israel and Judah, which were later conquered and destroyed by the Assyrian, Babylonian and Persian empires. 5.1: Bible – Foundation of Jewish identity – Skuola.net 2: History of the Jews: origins, religion and characteristics of the Jewish people | Studenti.it 3: History of the Jews – Wikipedia 4: Who are the Jews and where do they come from? Origins of the people between … – TAG24 5: Origins and history of the ancient Jews – Skuola.net The Nuragic people and the Jews have various cultural and religious aspects in common, so let’s try to imagine a possible link between the shofar and the horns used in the Nuragic helmets. The shofar is a ram’s horn used as a musical instrument and as a religious signal by the Jews. It has a very ancient origin and is often mentioned in the Bible, where it has various functions: announcing the new moon and holidays, proclaiming the year of jubilee, accompanying prayers, etc.3 The shofar also has a symbolic meaning, linked to the sacrifice of Isaac, who was replaced by a ram, and to the liberation from the Egyptian yoke4. The Nuragic helmets with horns are instead bronze artefacts, which depict warriors with curved horns on their headdresses. These are very rare and precious objects, which probably had a ceremonial and not warlike function. The horns could be a symbol of power and strength, linked to the cult of the bull, widespread in the ancient Mediterranean and venerated in Atlantis, that is, in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged under the Western Mediterranean 5. A possible link between the shofar and the Nuragic horns could therefore be of a religious and cosmic nature. The Nuragic people, who were a people of navigators and traders, became the Jewish people due to migrations caused by the rise in the eustatic level; they were Semitics from the Atlantean Sardinian-Corsican block and perhaps used the horn as a sacred instrument. Probably the horn was a symbol of strength and fertility, linked to the sun and the sky. These are just hypotheses, which have no claim to historical truth, but only to stimulate curiosity and imagination but above all to allow the reader to find new interpretations on his own that perhaps no scholar had ever hypothesized before. 1: The Vikings and the Nuragics, the strange case of the helmets – La Nuova Sardegna 2: Nuragic horns, Vikings… – History and archaeology – Lamoneta.it 3: Shofar – Wikipedia 4: Shofar – It.Chabad.org 5: Some notes on Nuragic helmets and the symbolism of horns … – YouTube: When Sonchis of Sais tells Solon about the warrior people of Atlantis, he tells him that they had the oldest old people, that is, that the population lived a very very long time. Now, let’s check whether this requirement is met in the people who could be Nuragic-Jewish: in Exodus 6: 16 The years of Levi’s life were one hundred and thirty-seven years; Exodus 6: 18 The years of Keat’s life were one hundred and thirty-three years; Exodus 6:20 The years of Amram’s life were one hundred and thirty-seven. We have two elders living to 137 years and one to 133; this seems to respect what Sonchis told Solon in the history of the warrior people of Atlantis, so the Ysri seem to respect these characteristics, indirectly confirming the possibility that they are the same people. Exodus 11: 2 2Tell the people, each man from his neighbor, and each woman from her neighbor, to ask for articles of silver and articles of gold. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean population that is now slaves of Pharaoh in the land of Egypt, after the migration known as the “peoples of the sea,” is the Nuragic population expert in metallurgy and in the fusion of Nuragic bronzes; therefore this sentence is very understandable: the proto-Hebrew Nuragic people knew very well how to smelt metals, so they knew that with metal weapons they could fight, make idols and so on. In short, the Jewish people know metallurgy because they are the Nuragic people. They are exactly the same type of people and culture. Only in the desert the Nuragic Jews are in trouble, because in Atlantis, that is on the Sardinian-Corsican geological block when it was an emerged land, they had everything: food, metals, weapons, technology, knowledge, teachers, well-being, military protection, soldiers, warships… now these Nuragic tribes are isolated far from their homeland and forced to live like poor wretches, first slaves of the Pharaoh, and then wandering in the desert like desperate people. But a Nuragic Jew called USAI, many centuries later, will still be at the court of the Pharaoh, and in fact today we have scientific evidence with what is called, in the Museum of Bologna, The USAI Mummy. I invite readers to document themselves to learn new things. The false door stele of Sameri – Egyptian Section of the Civic Archaeological Museum of Bologna In the Sardinian language Sa Meri means “The Mistress, the One who commands”. Since the Sardinian language is not studied in any university or school, practically nowhere in the world or almost, how can Egyptologists make mental associations between the Sardinian language and the Egyptian language? It is impossible, unless an Egyptologist is also Sardinian and maybe is also called USAI like the mummy. The writer Luigi Usai, unfortunately, is absolutely NOT an Egyptologist or a scientist. All these associations of ideas are only the result of my curiosity and general culture. Any Sardinian, hearing that this stele is called SAMERI, immediately thinks of the Sardinian Sa Meri, or The Mistress, The One who commands, The One who decides everything as she pleases. Maybe it is time to start teaching the Sardinian language to the extraordinary and highly prepared Egyptologists. Religious Rituals and Symbolism: My interpretation of Nuragic religious rituals, such as the use of the “calf of light” in the Nuraghe of Santa Barbara, and the parallel with the biblical stories of Jesus and the golden calf, offers an interesting perspective on the possible cultural and symbolic influences between these traditions. However, it is important to conduct further archaeological and anthropological studies to better understand the context and meaning of such religious practices. Archaeological sites and cultural connections: The discovery of sites such as El Ahwat in Israel, with possible architectural similarities to the Nuragic towers of Sardinia, suggests possible contacts and cultural exchanges between ancient Mediterranean civilizations. Your theory about the Nuragic origin of such constructions and the migration of the Sardinian-Corsican sea peoples to Palestine and Lebanon is intriguing, but would require further archaeological research and comparative analysis to be confirmed. Linguistic and toponymic evolution: My observation about the linguistic mutation from “Mitza” to “Mitzveh” in the context of sacred toponymy is interesting and could suggest possible historical links between the ancient cultures of Sardinia and the Near East. However, it is important to conduct in-depth linguistic and historical research to evaluate this hypothesis accurately. Exodus 11:1-7 1The LORD said to Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt: 2″This month shall be for you the beginning of months; it shall be the first month of the year for you. 3Speak to the whole assembly of Israel and say: ‘On the tenth day of this month each of you shall take for itself a lamb, according to the number of people in the family, a lamb for each household. 4If the household is too small for a lamb, then it shall join its neighbor, closest to its household, according to the number of people; you shall calculate the lamb according to how much each one can eat. 5Your lamb shall be without blemish, a year-old male; you may take it from the sheep or from the goats. 6You shall keep it until the fourteenth day of this month; then the whole assembly of the assembly of Israel shall slaughter it at twilight. We have seen how the Nuragic people currently in the land of Egypt are slaves and poor, and it is expected that they will travel through the desert. It was probably not possible to find a calf without defects for each family, as the Nuragic rite required (remember the logical steps, still in the form of hypotheses for now? The calf of light entered from the window of the Nuraghe, and it was the son of the Bull God, who came to be sacrificed for the Nuragic people, who probably celebrated that day by sacrificing a calf and eating veal, a sort of Dionysian Sparagmos, in this case a sparagmos of the sacrificial calf son of the Bull God of Light). Since it was impossible to find a calf for each family, Moses ordered that they get a lamb, easier to find in those conditions. So slowly, the Nuragic rites and habits and customs are changing, piece by piece, little by little, over the years. They cannot build Nuraghes in the desert, because they do not have the raw materials; they cannot sacrifice calves, because in the desert at most they can get lambs; they can no longer perform the ritual of the calf of light that enters from the window of the nuraghe because there are no more nuraghe in the desert. Little by little the Nuragic religion changes, slowly becoming what will later be the Jewish religion changed by circumstances, by isolation, by the lack of raw materials. Those who cast “Nuragic” bronzes now have other raw materials from the Pharaoh, of a different nature, so they must adapt their skills and techniques to the circumstances caused by the migration, in the form of the peoples of the sea, to Egypt. Sonchis of Sais, however, states to Solon that the people of Atlantis were extremely advanced: probably the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean casting techniques had positively impressed the Egyptian “scientists” priests and scribes, who certainly had great respect for the skills of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Nuragic people. Slowly, the scenario of Egypt changes: it is no longer the Egypt that we were taught at school, but it is an Egypt that has learned a lot and learned from the presence of the peoples of the Sardinian-Corsica sea, the Atlanteans, who were forced to migrate,fearing the total submersion of the Sardinian-Corsica geological block, as they could not know that in reality, two plateaus of Atlantis would remain above water, which we today call Sardinia and Corsica. The entire ancient world now takes on a new light. The Atlantean populations play a central role in the colonization of Egypt, in the interaction with this ancient people, in the anthropological exchange of culture, information, languages, ideas, techniques, technologies, artisan skills, smelting, cultural, linguistic, scientific, linguistic translation, trade, weaving and coloring of fabrics, shipbuilding, which probably changed in this historical period in Egypt with the new knowledge brought by the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans… and this is why “fast ships of Tarshish” arrived to King Solomon: because being originally from the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean geological block he had the right to be able to trade with the Atlanteans who were still on the islands and had not left, or who after a few centuries perhaps had begun to repopulate the islands of Sardinia and Corsica which had probably remained abandoned, or with very few inhabitants who had had the courage to stay, perhaps thinking of facing death on their own lands. In some videos on Youtube, you can hear the analyses of some linguists and epigraphists who claim that the Navicella di Teti has unmistakable signs of writing. The translation would speak of a Bull of Light. I am certain of the accuracy of this translation and I thank the scholars who do this research; the translation “Bull of Light” is perfectly consistent with the information obtained from this page. The Sardinian-Corsican-Nuragic Atlanteans venerated the God Bull, who sent his son, a bull-calf of light, to the base of the Nuraghe. So the Navicella di Teti is speaking of the phenomenon of the calf of light offered as a sacrifice for the Nuragic people. This aspect of the Nuragic religion will be transformed later, as already said in these texts, when Jesus will state that “I am the Light of the world”: he is speaking of the phenomenon of light in the Nuragic environment, without knowing it, because about 1000 thousand years have passed and the origins of this cult are now lost. The Nuragic religion has undergone a profound metamorphosis, and has been filtered by the cultures to which the Nuragic Jews have been filtered: the Egyptian, the Assyrian, the Babylonian. And while the calf light of the world is the son of the God Baal, Jesus becomes the son of an anthropomorphic God, and is the light of the world as in the Nuragic religion and is offered in sacrifice for us as in the same way in the Nuragic religion a calf was offered in sacrifice, which was perhaps also eaten by the population that lived around the nuraghe. I have not yet checked to find out if sacrificial remains of calves-bulls have been found in the nuraghe, but everything I have learned so far would lead me to imagine that this is the case. Baal also written Ba’al or BULL, the name of God of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean people, in American will become Bull because the Indian pronunciation Hopi, Mohave, of the Aztecs, of the American natives of Uto-Aztecan languages deriving from the Semitic Atlantean agglutinative ergative will be converted into the English language in America. So the term Bull derives from the god Baal and means Bull in the Atlantean Sardinian language, agglutinative Semitic ergative race. The Bible passage involving Jeroboam and the golden calves. Here is the Bible version of 1 Kings 12:26-30: “26 Jeroboam said to himself, ‘Now the kingdom will return to the house of David. 27 If this people go up to sacrifice at the house of the LORD in Jerusalem, then the hearts of this people will turn to their lord Rehoboam king of Judah, and they will kill me. ’ 28 So the king consulted his people and made two golden calves, saying to them, ‘It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem. Here are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt. ’ 29 He placed one in Bethel and the other in Dan. 30 This was a sin. The people went before the one as far as Dan.” (1 Kings 12:26-30, NIV) This passage describes how Jeroboam, fearing that the people of Israel would revert to the dynasty of David if they continued to go to Jerusalem to worship, decided to create two golden calves as idols to be worshiped in Bethel and Dan. This act was considered a sin in the eyes of God and contributed to the division of the tribes of Israel. Jeroboam made the golden calves with the intention of providing the people of Israel with alternative objects of worship to the Temple of Jerusalem, reproducing the ancient Nuragic tradition slightly modified: since there were no nuraghe, and therefore no bull of light coming in through the window, he provided golden calves that would reflect the sunlight, shining and shining. He feared that if the people continued to go to Jerusalem to worship in the Temple, their hearts would turn to the king of Judah, Rehoboam, and his dynasty. Jeroboam wanted to maintain political and religious control over the post-Nuragic tribes of Israel, so he tried to consolidate his power by reintroducing Nuragic religious practices that the people knew very well and by creating golden calves as symbols of worship in place of the calves of light that appeared from the window of the nuraghe, since there were no nuraghes in the places where they were located. This gesture was considered an act of rebellion against the cult in Jerusalem and against the law of God, and had negative consequences both politically and “spiritually” for the people of Israel. As you can see, if this interpretation is true, it means that religion was used as a tool to control the population, and not because it was truly loaded with significant value. In practice, Jeroboam does this to control the masses, not because he truly believes in it. So religion appears in this interpretation as a way to control the people who would otherwise become violent and aggressive: religion is a tool to control the masses. I discovered on March 5, 2024 on Facebook that an Association is called Tzur. I checked online, and discovered that in Hebrew it means “Rock”. I contacted the Association to find out why they have this name, and they told me that according to various sources, the ancient name of Tharros was Tzur: if it were true, it would mean “rock” in Hebrew, but why? Would the Jews have colonized Tharros or the Sinis in Sardinia? No, given that the veracity of this information needs to be scientifically verified, to understand if it is scientifically founded, it is simpler that that was the language of the Nuragic people. Archaeologists, however, have systematically turned the information upside down: it was the Phoenicians who colonized us; it was the Carthaginians who colonized us; because for the academic culture and mentality developed to date, it seemed impossible that it was the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans who colonized and conquered other territories in the Mediterranean; then came the discovery of El Ahwat, an entire Nuragic village in Israel, and here all the certainties collected by archaeologists up to now crumble into a thousand pieces, here all the lies said in the past begin to shatter… Before being called Tharros was it called Tzur? We therefore now need certain sources, documentary, written or archaeological or of another scientific nature, that allow us to confirm this line of thought. Even if this point were wrong, that is, that no Sardinian town had the name of Tzur, there are already many points listed that are impressive and all converge towards the confirmation that the Jewish people were in reality a Sardinian-Corsican migration to Egypt. It is impressive how day after day the discoveries and information on these incredible topics increase, I feel very lucky and very excited: forgive me if for a few seconds I stop writing in the third person and switch to the first, but I feel truly honored. It is a unique privilege, which will probably never be repeated, to be able to experience these emotions firsthand. This information is so revolutionary that I myself have a hard time believing it, let alone the Scientific Community, which does everything to put spokes in the wheels of new discoveries. I, on the other hand, would be happy to help a potential discoverer and innovator test his ideas, to understand if they are right or totally irrational. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm states among other things that Kuntillet Ajrud, an archaeological site dating back to the end of the 9th-8th century BC, was populated by a part of the migrations of sea peoples, including perhaps also Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Nuragic populations. This is the reason for the worship of the Bull, Baal, of El, perhaps a prefix of the Sardinian toponym Elmas, and of Yahweh, a Nuragic divinity first and then a Jewish one. Develop and deepen the theme of the female deity and how she was erased from the changed religious precepts during and after the Exodus. Asherah, a female deity, is mentioned in the Bible in various contexts. Here are some quotes: In the Book of Kings, reference is made to a statue of Asherah in the Temple of Yahweh in Jerusalem. This statue was offered votive objects of cloth made by the female staff of the Temple. 1 Deuteronomy 16:21 forbids planting trees as asherah, considering it idolatry. 2 The Book of Jeremiah, written around 628 BC, uses the title “queen of heaven” in chapters 7 and 44. However, this term probably refers to one of the Semitic fertility goddesses, not necessarily Asherah. 2
In short, Asherah is associated with fertility, motherhood, and nature, but her worship is condemned in the Bible. 3 Specific chapter and verse citations may vary depending on context and interpretation.
The pendulum spindle for carding byssus, found in the tomb finds in Sant’Antioco, has been named as being of “Jewish origin”. According to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm, in reality this spindle is not of Jewish origin but of Nuragic origin, as explained in these texts: until today it was thought that the Jews were a people totally distant and different from the Sardinians, while the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm states that the Jews are a Sardinian-Nuragic-Atlantean migration to the land of Egypt. The ancient tradition of palms in Sardinia:
Palms play a significant role in both Jewish and Christian religious rituals. Let’s explore how they are used in both traditions:
Judaism: Feast of Tabernacles (Soukkot): Jews celebrate this holiday to coincide with the New Year. During Soukkot, they build a hut (called a Soukka) to commemorate the exodus from Egypt. This hut has a roof made mainly of palm trees. It is a place of conviviality and reflection, where people gather for meals and sometimes even sleep. Palm trees are an integral part of this celebration and are used to decorate Soukka 1.
Christianity: Palm Sunday: This holiday commemorates the triumphal entry of Christ into Jerusalem. Palms and green branches are blessed by priests and carried in procession. The palms symbolize welcome and joy at the arrival of Christ. This tradition has roots in the Gospel account of the Passion of Christ 1.
In both traditions, palms symbolically represent life, victory and blessing. Their presence in religious rites connects the past to the present and transmits profound meanings to communities of believers.
Mont’e Prama means Mount of Palms: it is possible that there is some relationship between this name and the cultic use made through palms in Sardinia and among the Jewish people. This is an aspect that should be studied and explored as much as the other points listed.
Mont’e Prama, located in Sardinia, is an archaeological site of great importance. Buried finds have been discovered here that shed light on the ancient past of the island.
Statues of the Giants: In the burial area of Mont’e Prama, dating back to the 8th century BC, 5178 fragments of statues were found. These pieces, which include heads, busts, arms, legs and shields, were patiently recomposed in the Restoration and Conservation Centre of Li Punti (Sassari). The result is the creation of 26 mighty sculptures, approximately two metres high. These statues, known as Statues of the Giants, represent one of the most important archaeological discoveries in Sardinia and offer a unique opportunity to study Nuragic art and culture1. Excavation Campaign 2023: The recent excavation campaign at Mont’e Prama, conducted by the Superintendence of Archaeology, Fine Arts and Landscape for the metropolitan city of Cagliari and the provinces of Oristano and South Sardinia, has brought to light new simple shaft tombs and fragments pertaining to nuraghe models. These fragments integrate the already rich dossier of known nuraghe models and allow us to deepen our knowledge of the architecture of Nuragic structures. Furthermore, these findings offer insights into the ritual meaning of these objects in relation to the context of their discovery2. Future prospects: The excavation site at Mont’e Prama will continue until June 2024 on a larger area than in the past. It is hoped that it will return new elements useful for reconstructing the context around the necropolis, both in the Nuragic age and in the preceding and subsequent ones. The collaboration between the ABAP Superintendency and the Mont’e Prama Foundation is fundamental for the valorization and dissemination of the knowledge acquired3.
In short, Mont’e Prama is an archaeological treasure that offers us a window into Sardinia’s distant past, through its imposing statues and the buried secrets that continue to emerge.
Logically and historically connecting Luigi Usai’s ideas on the Nuragic origins of the Jewish people with the recent findings at Nuraghe Santu Miali in Pompu requires careful consideration of both archaeological evidence and theoretical interpretations. Here is a possible connection:
Finds at Nuraghe Santu Miali in Pompu Recently, excavations at Nuraghe Santu Miali in Pompu have brought to light a cache of late Roman lamps featuring Christian and Jewish symbols, as well as pagan myths. This suggests strong religious contamination and tolerance in Sardinia in the 4th century AD. The lamps indicate that the site was reused as an open-air sanctuary during the late Roman era (Atlantis Discovery).
Luigi Usai’s Theories Luigi Usai argues that the Jewish people have Nuragic origins, linking the migrations of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean peoples to the cultural and religious roots of the Jews. Usai bases his theories on various elements, including the linguistic and cultural connections between Sardinia and other Mediterranean civilizations, including the Egyptian one (Atlantis Discovery) (Atlantis Discovery) (Atlantis Discovery) (Atlantis Discovery).
Logical and Historical Connection Cultural and Religious Influences:
The discovery of lamps with Jewish and Christian symbols in Sardinia suggests that there was a significant Jewish presence in the region during the late Roman period. This could be seen as a clue to the migrations and cultural interactions that Usai argues brought Nuragic traditions to other Mediterranean civilizations, including the Jewish one. Tolerance and Religious Syncretism:
The presence of Christian, Jewish and pagan symbols in the same archaeological context indicates an environment of tolerance and religious syncretism. This could support Usai’s idea of a Nuragic civilization that influenced and integrated various religious and cultural traditions. Migrations and Cultural Exchanges:
Cultural exchanges and migrations are key elements in Usai’s theories. The findings at Pompu could be interpreted as evidence of such movements, suggesting that Sardinia was a crossroads of cultural influences during the late Roman period. This coincides with the idea that the Nuragic peoples had a connection with other Mediterranean civilizations. Archaeological Evidence of Cultural Contamination:
Excavations revealing different religious symbols at the same site reinforce the idea of cultural contamination, which could be seen as a reflection of Nuragic influences on other cultures, including the Jews. Conclusion While Luigi Usai’s theories on the Nuragic origins of the Jewish people are speculative and not widely accepted in the academic community, recent finds at Nuraghe Santu Miali di Pompu provide an archaeological context that could be interpreted to support his ideas. The presence of Jewish, Christian and pagan symbols together could indicate a complex network of cultural and religious influences, suggesting that Sardinia was an important point of contact between different civilizations in the ancient world.
Alternative theories to that of Luigi Usai
There are several alternative theories that explore the origins of the Jewish people. Some scholars, such as those at Tel Aviv University, have challenged the conventional understanding of Jewish origins, casting doubt on the existence of Abraham and other ancestors described in Genesis, the Exodus from Egypt, Joshua’s conquest of Canaan, and other events known from the Bible.
These archaeologists have also challenged the Bible’s claim that the early ancestors of the Israelites came to Canaan as outsiders, finding continuities between the ancient Israelite culture and the earlier indigenous Canaanite culture. Many now believe that the early Israelites were actually Canaanites who began to see themselves as non-Canaanites for some reason.1
Another interesting theory was proposed by Shlomo Sand in his book “The Invention of the Jewish People”, where he argues that the concept of a Jewish people was partly invented, and that conversions to Judaism over the centuries played a significant role in the formation of Jewish identity2.
These theories require critical analysis and must be evaluated in light of historical and archaeological evidence. It is important to note that these theories can be controversial and are not universally accepted in the academic community. However, they offer interesting perspectives and stimulate further discussion and research into the origins of one of the oldest and most continuously documented peoples in the world.
What would happen if the undersigned Dr. Luigi Usai was right and the Jewish People were nothing other than an ancient migration of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean peoples to the land of Egypt?
If this conjecture is correct, it would have significant implications for understanding the history and culture of the ancient Mediterranean. Here are some key points to consider:
Rewriting Biblical History: If the Jewish people were actually a migration of the Sardinian Nuragic people, this would imply a rewriting of Biblical history and the Exodus narrative. It would be a significant revision of the origins of the Jewish people and their experience in Egypt. Common Roots: If the Sardinian Nuragic people were the ancestors of the Jewish people, there would be a cultural and linguistic connection between Sardinia and the ancient Hebrews. This would open up new avenues of research and study on the shared roots of Mediterranean cultures. Impact on Linguistics: If the Hebrew language had its roots in the Nuragic language, as suggested, this could have significant implications for historical linguistics and the understanding of the evolution of languages in the Mediterranean. Archaeology and Physical Evidence: Further archaeological research and scientific analysis would be needed to confirm or refute this theory. This could include the study of artifacts, inscriptions and other material remains that may or may not support the hypothesis of the Nuragic migration to Egypt and beyond. Reinterpretation of Nuragic culture: If the Nuragic people were indeed the precursors of the ancient Hebrews, this could lead to a greater understanding and appreciation of Nuragic culture and its importance in the context of the ancient Mediterranean.
Ultimately, if this conjecture were correct, we would have a radically different view of the ancient history of the Mediterranean and its cultures, with significant consequences for multiple academic disciplines.
Text in progress:
Luigi Usai’s Nuragic-Proto-Jewish theory argues that the Jewish people in Egypt were actually the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean Nuragic people, one of the Sea Peoples who invaded the Ancient Near East in the 13th-12th century BC. According to Usai, the Nuragic people migrated to Egypt due to the rising sea level, and then sought a promised land in Palestine. Usai relies on archaeological, linguistic, toponymic and biblical sources, which he interprets in an original and personal way. This theory differs significantly from the dominant theories, which are based on the Documentary Hypothesis and historical criticism to reconstruct the origins and identity of the Jewish people. The dominant theories believe that the Jewish people were born from the fusion of various ethnic and cultural groups, including the Abrahamites, the Canaanites, the Israelites and the Jews, and that they underwent various influences and transformations throughout their history. The dominant theories consider the Bible as a literary source, containing various editorial layers and traditions, and not as a reliable historical source.
Secondly, I recommend that you illustrate the differences between Usai’s theory and the dominant theories, using subtitles to organize your text into thematic sections. This way, your text will be clearer and more structured for the reader. You can use subtitles like these:
The archaeological sources
In this section, you can compare the archaeological evidence that Usai uses to support his theory, such as the sculptures of Mont’e Prama, the nuraghe of Santa Barbara and the city of Bithia, with the archaeological evidence that dominant theories use to reconstruct the history of the Jewish people, such as the Merenptah Stele, the Temple of Jerusalem and the Tel Dan inscriptions.
Linguistic sources
In this section, you can compare the linguistic analyses that Usai uses to support his theory, such as the name of God, the name of Moses, and the name of Sinnai, with the linguistic analyses that dominant theories use to reconstruct the language and culture of the Jewish people, such as philology, dialectology, and sociolinguistics.
Toponymic sources
In this section, you can compare the toponymic interpretations that Usai uses to support his theory, such as the name Nur, the name Nora, and the name Ichnussa, with the toponymic interpretations that mainstream theories use to reconstruct the geography and demography of the Jewish people, such as biblical toponymy, Egyptian toponymy, and Canaanite toponymy.
Biblical sources
In this section, you can compare the biblical readings that Usai uses to support his theory, such as the flight from Egypt, Mount Sinai, and the golden calf, with the biblical readings that dominant theories use to reconstruct the religion and literature of the Jewish people, such as the Documentary Hypothesis, historical criticism, and literary criticism.
It could be assumed that the sculptures of Mont’e Prama represent the Jewish patriarchs, as the writer Usai claims, but there is no definitive evidence to confirm this. According to some scholars, the sculptures of Mont’e Prama are instead artistic expressions of the Nuragic civilization, which had no connection with the Jewish people. It is not excluded that the name of God, “I am”, has a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin, as Usai claims, but it is possible that it is instead a theophoric name, which expresses the transcendence and uniqueness of God. According to some scholars, the name of God, “I am”, is an abbreviated form of the Hebrew name Yahweh, which means “He causes to be”.
Possible titles for a book on the topic:
The People of the Sea: The Sardinian Theory Atlantean Course on the Origins of the Jews Nuragic and Jews: A Hidden History Between Sardinia, Egypt and Palestine Atlantis and Israel: The Surprising Connection Between the Nuragic People and the Jewish People Secret Sardinia: How the Nuragic People Became the Jewish People The Nuragic Bible: The Revolutionary Theory That Changes the History of the Jewish People
The initial work has already been published with the title:
The Nuragic Origin of the Jewish People: In Search of Shared Origins v. 0.0.0.625 Paperback – March 5, 2024 by Luigi Usai (Author)
Artificial intelligence can’t compete.
It short-circuits for statistical reasons: the whole world or almost says that Atlantis does not exist, so if just one person says the opposite, it does not matter if he is right, statistically it turns out that he is wrong. AI is not yet able to have the gift of Insight, that is, intuition, with which humans understand that they are facing a new scientific discovery.
Here is the table I requested from an Artificial Intelligence. I asked it to check the true and false sentences according to the current state of official knowledge, for example literary and archaeological. It all turns out to be false. So if in the future it is proven that I am right, it will mean that my brain has elaborated this theory and has managed to see that although for the whole world this information is false, in reality it is true. 100% of the statements are false on the sample, while for me 100% are true, it is the rest of the world that should learn new missing information: this is why I created this site, to help the world better understand this information and make it their own. I have analyzed each proposition based on the available information:
Table
Proposition Truth The Jewish people in Egypt are the Nuragic Sardinian Corsican Atlantean people False12 The Nuragic Sardinian Corsican Atlantean people are a people of the sea False3 The people of the sea migrated to Egypt due to the rising of the eustatic level of the Atlantic Ocean False456 The Atlantic Ocean is today called the Western Mediterranean False789 The Jewish people in Egypt around the year 1200 BC are the Nuragic Sardinian Corsican Atlantean people False12 The Nuragic Sardinian Corsican Atlantean people are one of the various peoples of the sea mentioned in official historical, archaeological and literary sources False10111213 The Bible is the story of the Nuragic Jewish people who fled from the Sardinian Corsican geological block False14 The Nuragic Jewish people fled due to a significant rising of the eustatic level False151617 The Sardinian Corsican geological block was called Atlantis by the Egyptians False18
Please note that these conclusions are based on available information and may not be definitive. I recommend that you do further research or consult an expert for more accurate information.
Version 258 Discovery of the Isle of Atlantis, the Garden of the Hesperides, the Pillars of Hercules, Lake Tritonide, the Gorgons
There is genetic, tectonic, archaeological, hydrographic, geological, geographical, paleontological, phonological, onomastic, toponymic and linguistic evidence for the existence of Atlantis, which will be listed below on this page.
The text will be endlessly corrected, in an attempt to create a readable text for the Scientific Community.
18 July 2023: I thought I had located the exact position of the Pillars of Hercules, but instead (correction dated 06/08/2023) I discovered that this information had already been published by Professor Giorgio Saba, author of the text: “Sorry, where is Hades? Hypotheses on the ancient history of Sardinia” . I contacted Professor Pierluigi Montalbano to communicate my potential discovery, and he informed me that this information had already been discovered and published, even though I had never heard of it before.
Congratulations to Professor Giorgio Saba, official discoverer of the Pillars of Hercules of Carloforte.
The very kind Professor Giorgio Saba has found the real Pillars of Hercules : they are the Faraglione Antiche Columns of Carloforte, on the Island of San Pietro, in Sardinia (Italy); his discovery is described in the text “ Excuse me, where is Hades? Hypotheses on the ancient history of Sardinia ”. Official congratulations!
Sulcis is the capital of Atlantis;
Atlantis is not Sardinia: Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican geological block partially submerged due to causes to be ascertained; Sardinia is just a plateau of emerged land on the semi-submerged island of Atlantis. When the island was semi-submerged, what remained out of the water was then known as Sardinia and Corsica. Corsica was the mountainous part north of Atlantis.
There is evidence of a submersion, which occurred on a date to be determined;
There are white, red and black rocks: the black ones have even been exported throughout the Mediterranean Sea, and this is obsidian; the red rocks are very famous in Sardinia, in particular those of Arbatax and the red rocks of Carloforte, to name just a few. The Red Rocks of Ogliastra are one of the main naturalistic attractions of the region. Located on the central-eastern coast of Sardinia, these imposing red porphyry formations emerge from the emerald green waters, creating a spectacular color contrast with the white rocks and colored pebbles 1 .The Rocce Rosse bay opens to the east of the port of Arbatax, a tourist hamlet of Tortolì, with a bottom of white rocks and high red granite rocks that give the landscape a unique and extremely fascinating aspect 1 . The reflection of the rocks gives the water an iridescent emerald green color, creating a magical and breathtaking atmosphere, especially at sunset when the warm tones enhance the beauty of the landscape 1 . The Red Rocks were also the location for the final scene of the film “Swept Away by an Unusual Destiny” by Lina Wertmüller (1974) 1 . Other red porphyry cliffs dot the Ogliastra coast, such as Is Scoglius Arrubius, two twenty meter high stacks which are the symbol of the magnificent Cea beach, located a few kilometers to the south 1 . In summary, the Rocce Rosse dell’Ogliastra are a natural wonder that offers a breathtaking spectacle thanks to the chromatic contrast between the red rocks and the emerald green waters. A place not to be missed for anyone visiting Sardinia! Fetovaia, Neolithic port of the Sardinians in 3720 BC According to an article written by Angelo Mazzei, Fetovaia was a Neolithic port of the Sardinians in 3720 BC The “Circoli Arzachena” of Piane alla Sughera, on the Fetovaia mountain, are Neolithic circle tombs very similar to those of the Circoli di li Muri, in Sardinia. They are empirically dated to around the first half of the 4th millennium BC. According to Mazzei, they can be dated with greater precision to around 3750 BC, given the particularly intense situation in that era in the maritime routes of the Sardinian obsidian traders. Mazzei takes inspired by the discovery of a Neolithic site in Provence containing a deposit of approximately 5000 obsidian fragments from Monte Arci (Oristano). In 2005, a revolutionary discovery occurred near Trets, in the south of France, which has significantly expanded our understanding of the spread of obsidian in the northwestern Mediterranean region. This archaeological site, called “Terres Longues”, is located in the lower limestone Provence, in the Trets basin, and presents traces of dense prehistoric activity. Thanks to several archaeological investigations, it has been revealed that obsidian, a volcanic stone often used in prehistory, it was absent in excavated structures but was present in a specific soil level of the site. This soil layer also showed a large amount of flint (silex bédoulien), another type of stone used by the ancient inhabitants. Dating based on faunal remains found at the base of this ground level revealed that the site dates to the very end of the Chasséen period, placing it around 3720 ± 80 BC. The number of obsidian finds is impressive, amounting to 4548 pieces, making the Terres Longues site unique in southern France and beyond. Obsidian represents more than 20% of the entire assemblage, a remarkably high percentage compared to previously known data. The technological analysis of this lithic assemblage has the objective of defining the function of the site, in particular its role in the circuits for the diffusion of obsidian and Bedulian flint (silex bédoulien) and the possible presence of a Sardinian colony that served as a shopping center for sorting goods. Here are some sources that talk about the spread of Sardinian obsidian in Europe and around the world: making the Terres Longues site unique in the South of France and beyond. Obsidian represents more than 20% of the entire assemblage, a remarkably high percentage compared to previously known data. The technological analysis of this lithic assemblage has the objective of defining the function of the site, in particular its role in the circuits for the diffusion of obsidian and Bedulian flint (silex bédoulien) and the possible presence of a Sardinian colony that served as a shopping center for sorting goods. Here are some sources that talk about the spread of Sardinian obsidian in Europe and around the world: making the Terres Longues site unique in the South of France and beyond. Obsidian represents more than 20% of the entire assemblage, a remarkably high percentage compared to previously known data. The technological analysis of this lithic assemblage has the objective of defining the function of the site, in particular its role in the circuits for the diffusion of obsidian and Bedulian flint (silex bédoulien) and the possible presence of a Sardinian colony that served as a shopping center for sorting goods. Here are some sources that talk about the spread of Sardinian obsidian in Europe and around the world:
“Obsidian Studies in the Prehistoric Central Mediterranean: After 50 Years, What Have We Learned and What Still Needs to Be Done?” di Robert H. Tykot1
“Mediterranean Islands and Multiple Flows” di Robert H. Tykot2
Entry created with the help of Artificial Intelligence, to be rewritten and corrected: there is a lot of evidence of the cult of the bull; among many, the toponymic presence of the Isola del Toro, the Isola della Vacca; the cult of the bull at the temple of Matzanni; the discovery of many ritual bull heads. I will slowly compile all this evidence into this list item.
There is evidence of bull worship in Sardinia. One of the most important is the presence of bucrania, or bovine protomes, representing the bull’s horns, on many archaeological sites on the island. This symbol is one of the most prolific and long-lasting on the island, continuing through the Chalcolithic until the Bronze Age when the bull’s horns are depicted in relief on Nuragic tombs 1. The representation of bulls as sacred animals is extremely ancient and deeply rooted in the collective unconscious. In 15,000 BC, aurochs (the ancestor of our contemporary bulls) were painted in relief in the caves of Lascaux, presented in the famous Hall of the Bulls 1 . The cult of the bull spread throughout the Mediterranean during the late Chalcolithic, presumably transmitted via sailors on trade routes 1 .
The bull was the most present, not to say exclusive, animal in the Neolithic art and religion of Sardinia. In a stone amulet found in Bau Porcus, the importance and thaumaturgical value of the bull symbol is evident which is engraved with the oval-shaped head surmounted by lunate horns, as well as in the bovine protomes sculpted in the hypogeum of Sa Londra in Alghero, both ascribed to the Ozieri culture. A limestone tetrapod plate with taurine protomes comes from the locality of Bingia Eccia, near Dolianova. In the caves of Monte Majore and Sa Ucca ‘e su Tintirriolu, four fragments of vases dating back to the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC were found in which the pattern of the bull in the shape of a crescent, or with the trapezoidal head enlarged at the nostrils, or again, with the taurine protome, the latter consistently present in Anghelu Ruju, in the Cagliari area, painted on the architraves of the tombs. But the bull protomes are found, sculpted or painted, isolated or in pairs, in numerous domus de janas (tombs excavated in the rock usually reunited in necropolis) scattered throughout the Sardinian territory, as a magical and protective symbolism of burials. Not to mention the bronze statues of Sardinian warriors with helmets adorned with horns, sometimes placed vertically, other times horizontally. It seems strange that an animal like the bull, so useful in the daily reality of agricultural civilization and at the same time so sacred as to constitute almost a union between the animal and divine nature, was depicted only with the signs of the head and horns rather than with the entire body. After the very long period of human history dedicated exclusively to hunting and gathering, we must look back to the rise of pastoral and agricultural civilizations to better understand the meaning of these symbols. In fact, it was the moon that attracted the attention of prehistoric men with its cycles. Our satellite was considered the “personification” of Mother Earth in the sky due to its clear influence on the growth of plants and the outcome of the crops. The waxing and waning phases of its “quarters” brought to mind the ancient populations’ periods of fertility and pregnancy of women. In this sense the Bull-Moon God embodied male fertility also linked to agricultural fertility. The bull has an important symbolic meaning both in the culture of ancient Egypt and that of ancient Sardinia.
In Egypt , the Apis bull was revered as a deity, especially in Memphis. His cult has been documented since the 2nd Dynasty, and some think it may even date back to the 1st Dynasty. The figure of the bull may have been transmitted to the Egyptians in prehistoric times, a theory that requires further study.
In the Ozieri culture in Sardinia , the bull or ox was symbolically linked to male fertility and agrarian fertility. This belief was central to the Copper and Bronze Age civilizations. Taurus symbolism was connected with maternal (and lunar) and paternal (and solar) symbolism.
The Bull God in Sardinia : Giovanni Lilliu describes the cult of the bull in Sardinia, noting the importance of the ox as a partner of the Mother Goddess and protector of the living and the dead. Its aniconic manifestations included large pointed vertical stones (menhirs) and bull protomes in underground tombs.
Possible connection between the two cultures : Although there are intriguing parallels between the bull cult in the two regions, there is no direct evidence of a connection or mutual influence. Bull symbolism was common to many ancient cultures, so the similarities could be coincidental or the result of cultural convergence.
In conclusion, the cult of the bull is a fascinating feature of both Egyptian and Sardinian cultures, and the similarities between the two may be suggestive of universal themes connected to agriculture, fertility and power. Further research could clarify whether there is a direct connection between these religious practices.
The catastrophe cited by Plato must have been the geological phenomenon of partial submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block , perhaps causedfrom the Slab Roll-Back, from the possible presence of a tectonic fault that passes under the Sulcis and continues, on one side towards Gibraltar and on the other towards Pompeii and Herculaneum, and visible using the satellite and bathymetric map of Google Maps, available free of charge online. Furthermore, the Meltwater Pulses also happened in that historical period. The era in which the Sardinian-Corsican block was called Atlantis was therefore before 9600 BC. The mud caused by marine erosion and currents made it impossible to sail along the island, so probably for a few centuries the island remained unreachable, thus contributing to making people forget the power of this warlike ancient people. Atlantis has a north-south orientation, as stated by Plato. The northern part is full of excellent winds for navigation, and in fact between Corsica and Sardinia there is one of the best sailing schools in Europe. The ephemeral vision was correct: Poseidon was an ancient ruler of the Sardinian-Corsican island when it was still an emerged land, then deified. If all this is correct, it means that in the dispute between catastrophists and evolutionists, in relation to Atlantean issues, the catastrophists were right. At the current moment, however, it was not yet clear which of the two factions could be right.
Why are there no archaeological or historical traces of such an advanced and powerful civilization in the Corsican Sardinian block? Because the population particularly preyed on marine resources, like the two individuals found at the Su Carroppu rock shelter in Sirri, and to do so they lived on the Atlantean paleocoasts, today called the Sardinian Corsa Continental Shelf. Part of the civilization and population that were located on the paleocoasts were submerged and then swept away by approximately eleven thousand six hundred years of marine currents, which transformed the paleocoasts into a continental platform that now surrounds the Sardinian geological block. Furthermore, we know from experience that as the years pass, sedimentary deposits stratify: for example, the Roman remains from around two thousand years ago are potentially found under a few meters of sediment and debris. Therefore, logically, if a scholar wanted to find the sedimentary layers that contain the remains of the Atlantean civilization, he would have to carry out a stratigraphic study that reaches the stratigraphy of 9600 BC, i.e. the layer of approximately 11,600 years ago. The refuge sottoroccia Su Carroppu returned the DNA of two out of three individuals, of a population with DNA almost entirely different from the DNA of the population that subsequently colonized the island of Sardinia three thousand years later. Therefore, we can temporarily hypothesize that the two individuals analyzed at Su Carroppu di Sirri are from the Atlantean population. From this hypothesis, it can be deduced that the Atlanteans, in addition to preying on marine resources and living in the paleocoasts, they lived in caves or rock shelters. Various very ancient caves are concentrated in Sulcis: the caves of Is Zuddas; the Acquacadda cave; and other caves that I am unable to list at the moment, but which may slowly be added to this list. Therefore, in order to disprove my theory, it would be enough to carry out stratigraphic analyzes in these caves, to demonstrate that they were not inhabited in 9600 BC or before. In fact, Plato states that the Atlantean catastrophe dates back nine thousand years before Solon’s journey to Sais in Egypt, and this journey occurred approximately in 590 BC. From these statements, another very important question can also be answered, reported below. If the Atlantean civilization was as advanced and powerful, as Plato says, it should also have left traces on the mainland, not just on the paleocoasts. And in fact, in my opinion, he left the traces in the caves around the Atlantis plateau which now emerges from the sea and which has been called, by our civilization, with the name of Sardinia. In fact, remains dating back to around 20,000 years ago were found in the Lanaittu cave, and this is perfectly consistent with the Corsican Sardinian Atlantis theory. Atlantis was inhabited even 20,000 years ago. Indeed, at the present time it seems that Sardinia was inhabited since at least 300,000 years ago. This is why Plato states that it was “ancient to the ancients”. And this would also be the reason why the priest of the goddess Neith a Sais told Solon that the Greeks were never old, they were young, and that their mythology was very similar to children’s fairy tales. The priest was trying to explain to Solon that the Greeks had lost the memory of what happened between Sardinian Corsican Atlantis and early Athens, because the survivors were not literate and could not write and pass on the memory of what happened around 9600 BC Everything stated is coherent, as a correct scientific theory must be. Therefore the traces of the Atlanteans, endowed with different DNA already classified by the archaeogenetic studies carried out by the Department of Prehistory of the University of Cagliari together with the University of Florence and Ferrara and published in Scientific Report, must be looked for in the rock shelters throughout Sardinia and Corsica and in the caves scattered across these two islands, which are actually plateaus that emerged out of the sea on the underlying island of Atlantis. Atlantis was one of the names that the Egyptians gave to this island, which in the walls of the temple of Edfu in Egypt is also called Trample Island, War Island, Peace Island, Egg Island etc. By rereading and analyzing the texts of the temple of Edfu in this key, it is possible to obtain new information on Atlantis and its origins, which seem to be rooted in Egyptian mythology.
Plato describes Atlantis as an island larger than Libya and Asia combined: this is very possible, as at the present moment we do not know what the exact size of Libya and Asia was in 9600 BC. So we could proceed with a reverse reasoning: assuming that Plato reported authentic and truthful Egyptian sources, we can therefore deduce that in 9600 BC Libya and Asia were two geographical areas that covered a geographical area smaller than that covered by the Sardinian geological block -course currently submerged under the Mediterranean. Furthermore, the Libya of 9600 BC may not correspond at all with current Libya or with the concept of “Africa”. Indeed, the discoveries made by Luigi Usai in Birsa Bank, El Haouaria Bank, in the Iblean Sicily-Malta continental carbonate platform, flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment, they show vast territories currently unknown to archeology and official history, so the Scientific Community has yet to clarify what disappeared civilizations we are talking about, whether they are actually submerged buildings and cities; what civilizations they are; because they are submerged; when they were submerged, due to which events. In short, the new discoveries on the Mediterranean seabed open up extremely interesting and innovative scenarios.
There is numerous evidence of the existence of Atlantis in the Sardinian-Corsican block: Sardinian archaeologists stopped to analyze the stratigraphy up to the Nuragic; at the present moment it would seem that no one has excavated up to the stratigraphic layers of 9600 BC, thus making it impossible to have archaeological evidence, which has therefore never been looked for, as the Sardinian academic world, in its almost total entirety, believed that Atlantis was fruit of Plato’s imagination, as various archaeologists affirm in many videos and texts published online, for example at the Seminar called “Sa Mesa Archeotunda”.
The evidence of existence of canals is very strong: in fact there is a canal port like the one described for Atlantis, and it is the Canal Port of Cagliari; the geography and even the geology of Sulcis present, upon analysis of satellite images, trends in concentric circles or sections of circles; the geography of the center of Sulcis coincides with the Platonic descriptions: sacred woods (even today a large part of Sulcis is made up of woods and natural parks considered so precious that they have been made protected areas by the European Union, and this may be a reason why no excavations and core sampling studies were carried out to verify the possible presence of underground archaeological finds).
Atlantis was very rich in minerals: and it still is today, let’s imagine what it must have been like over 11,600 years ago! The Sulcis mines are famous throughout Europe, they have an ancient history and tradition, well known to geologists all over the world and which does not need to be further underlined. In Furtei there is still a gold mine which still allowed gold to be extracted a few decades ago; this suggests that in prehistory the mine could have been very rich in gold raw material. In Sardinia there are even unique minerals in the world, for example Ichnusaite, which takes its name from Ichnussa, the ancient name of Sardinia.
In Plato’s account of Atlantis, a plain adjacent to the city is described as having a perimeter of 2,000 x 3,000 stadia (385 x 580 km or 240 x 360 miles). One stadium corresponds to approximately 185 metres, so the plain had a perimeter of approximately 370 x 555 km. These are exactly the dimensions of the height and width of the submerged Corsican Sardinian geological block. This implies that in the past the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans had already managed to measure the exact extension of the island before it ended up submerged under the sea, or if you like, under the Atlantic Ocean, i.e. the current Sea of Corsica and Sardinia. The dimension taken in a north-south direction of the currently semi-submerged Corsican Sardinian block is exactly 555 kilometers, and this precision is impressive, and the fact that the size is so precise cannot be a coincidence: otherwise hundreds and hundreds of “coincidences” are listed on this page. These are not coincidences, but facts.
Lake Tritonide is the sum of the lakes, lagoons and ponds of Cagliari, Assemini, Elmas, Capoterra, Quartu, Molentargius, Stagno Conti Vecchi; it is yet to be determined whether the submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican block has modified the original dimensions of this lake believed mythological for millennia; I will analyze the sources slowly, trying to make sense of the ancient texts. Herodotus, Histories 4. 180 (Godley translation) (Greek historian 5th century BC):
I can not say; but I suppose the armor was Egyptian; for I hold that the Greeks got their shield and helmet from Egypt. As for Athena, they say that she was the daughter of Poseidon and Lake Tritonide, and that, for some reason angry with her father, she gave herself to Zeus, who made her his daughter. This is their story. Relationships between men and women are promiscuous; they do not live together but have relationships like cattle. When a woman’s child is well grown, the men gather within three months and the child is judged to be the man he most resembles.” This is their story. Relationships between men and women are promiscuous; they do not live together but have relationships like cattle. When a woman’s child is well grown, the men gather within three months and the child is judged to be the man he most resembles.” This is their story. Relationships between men and women are promiscuous; they do not live together but have relationships like cattle. When a woman’s child is well grown, the men gather within three months and the child is judged to be the man he most resembles.”Pseudo-Apollodorus, Bibliotheca 3. 144 (Aldrich translation) (Greek mythographer 2nd AD):
“They say that after the birth of Athena, she was raised by Triton [and presumably Tritonides], who had a daughter named Pallas. Both girls cultivated military life, which once led them to a contentious dispute. When Pallas was about to strike a blow at Athena, Zeus held out the aegis in a shadowy manner, so that she looked up to protect herself, and so it was wounded by Athena and fell. had happened to Pallas, Athena made a wooden image of her, and around her breast she tied the aegis that had frightened her, and she placed the statue next to Zeus and gave him honor of her.” Apollonius Rhodius, Argonautica 4. 1493 ff (Rieu translation) (Greek epic 3rd century BC):
“He [Amphithemis son of Apollo and Akakallis (Acacallis)] married the Nymph Tritonis and she bore him two sons, Nasamon and the mighty Kaphauros (Capauro).” Pausanias, Description of Greece 1. 14. 6 (Jones translation) (Greek travelogue C2nd AD):
“The Libyans say that the goddess [Athena] is the daughter of Poseidon and Lake Tritonides, and for this reason she has eyes blue like Poseidon.” Pseudo-Hyginus, Fabulae 14 ( Grant translation ) (Roman mythographer 2nd century AD):
“During the return journey [of the Argonauts] Eurybates, son of Teleon died, and Canto, son of . . ((gap)) They were killed in Libya by the shepherd Cephalion, brother of Nasamone, son of the Nymph Tritonide and Amphithemis, whose flocks they plundered.”
Legend has it that the inhabitants of Lake Tritonide stole and hid a tripod of the Argonauts: I theorized the hypothesis that the tripod mentioned in the legend of the Argonauts was actually hidden by the Sardinians after the arrival of the Argonauts in the area. This tripod may have been a precious or sacred artifact that aroused the interest of the Sardinians, leading them to copy its stylistic technique to produce local tripods. It is therefore possible not only a linguistic and cultural contamination between Greeks and Sardinians, but even an artistic and stylistic one. It is possible that among the fragments of Greek and Cypriot style tripods found by Sardinian archaeologists, there are even some fragments or parts of the tripod mentioned in the legend.
The Atlas Mountains mentioned by Herodotus in his Histories in Chapter IV are the Sulcis Mountains ;
Libya mentioned by Herodotus in his Histories in Chapter IV is an area of the current Province of Cagliari;
It is to be verified that the Cyrene named by Herodotus could be Cyrne:
from Treccani:” cirnènse adj. – Sinon. rare from Corsican (from Corsica), taken from the Greek name of the island Κύρνος (in Lat. Cyrnos or Cyrne ): the Cirnense dialects “.
Is Cyrene Cyrne, i.e. Corsica? If Libya is the current province of Cagliari, is Cyrene Corsica? Is Cyrenaica Corsica? Cyrne – Cyrene?
The “elephant species” widely present on Corsican Sardinian Atlantis is the Mammuthus Lamarmorae, today also known as the Sardinian dwarf elephant;
The Atlantic Ocean for Herodotus and Sonchis of Sais is the Sea of Sardinia and Corsica and other Mediterranean seas, but not the whole Mediterranean: only a subset of it; we therefore have the opportunity to make an approximate historical dating:
Solon’s journey to Sais can be dated around 590 BC;
Herodotus of Halicarnassus lived in the 5th century BC.
We can therefore deduce that in the 6th and 5th centuries BC in Egypt and Greece the Sea of Corsica and the Sea of Sardinia were still called the “Atlantic Ocean” by some Mediterranean scholars.
We can therefore infer that something happened later that forced a change in the geographical nomenclature. At the current moment, dated 08/17/2023, I still haven’t understood what happened. Why was the name of the Atlantic Ocean changed, i.e. the Sea of Atlantis? At the moment, I believe that as the power of Rome grew, the old name of the Mediterranean Ocean became unbearable for the Roman Senate: probably the Senate proposed a Damnatio Memoriæ at some point. Currently these statements are still experimental, because I am not a historian, therefore I do not have the cognitive structure necessary to formalize these ideas in a scientific way. I hope that some scholars will help me in this enormous difficulty of mine, putting my ideas to the test, as happens when benchmarking a software product.
The mud that surrounded the Sardinian-Corsican island of Atlantis is due to erosion by the undertow of the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts ; this erosion caused the generation of the so-called submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf;
Another source I used is the analysis of toponymy . I’m not an expert, I had to build my theory hypothesis after hypothesis. After understanding that Atlantis is the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, I wondered where the capital could have been. And by observing satellite maps I realized that Sulcis is made up of geological structures that resemble portions of concentric circles, like the capital of Atlantis described by Plato. After having reread the texts of Timaeus and Critias many times, I accidentally realized that in Sulcis, a region of present-day Sardinia, there were some toponyms that recall the Platonic story: many geographical locations of Sulcis in Sardinia (towns/localities/hamlets/towns/cities) contain names linked to the concept of cold water and hot water. However, these names of geographical locations are in Sardinian dialect, so a foreign scientist who does not know the Sardinian language and its constellation of dialect forms could never reach the same conclusions as me . I had the advantage of being born right near Sulcis, so these toponyms are in my first mother tongue, i.e. Campidanese Sardinian or its very similar variants (the linguistic variant of Sulcitan Sardinian). Much of the toponymy of Sulcis recalls the story of Atlantis : Acqua Callentis (hot water); Cold water(cold water); Acquacadda (hot water); S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (the hot water upstairs); S’Acqua Callenti de Basciu (the hot water below); the Acquafredda Castle (cold water castle) which stands on a mountain overlooking the place where the town of Acquafredda (cold water) , now disappeared, was present during the Middle Ages; Furriadroxiu (the place where everything turns upside down); Spistiddatroxiu (the place where one gets hurt); Piscinas (the swimming pools)… and who knows how many others. I then became aware that Sardinian toponymy had points in common with Greek and Egyptian ones : for example,Heliopolis means “city of the Sun”, while in Sulcis there is a place called Terresoli , which in the Sardinian language means “Land of the Sun”; Since I am not a specialist, reconstructing all this information is incredibly difficult and tiring work. I also noticed that the Egyptian priest known as Sonchis , who according to tradition told Solon the story of Atlantis against Athens, lived in the city of Sais ; Sais is also a Sardinian surname ; furthermore there are two places in Sulcis (they couldn’t be coincidences, there are too many, all together) called “Is Sais Superiore” and “Is Sais Inferiore” near Narcao. (21/08/2023) In other parts of this text I also point out the enormous presence of ancient Greek toponymy in Sardinia: I do not report the same information here so as not to be too repetitive, but you can see the etymology of Sardinian toponymy: the localities, towns and cities of Olbia, Musei, Tharros, Pistis, are just some of the Sardinian toponymy of possible Greek origin.
I have just discovered in recent days (19/03/2023) that some scholars have already noticed this incredible coincidence between Egyptian and Sardinian culture and toponymy on the following web pages:
Among other toponymic analyses, we can analyze the Sardinian toponym of Tharros. “Tharros (in Latin Tarrae, in ancient Greek Thàrras, Θάρρας ) is an archaeological site in the province of Oristano, located in the municipality of Cabras, in Sardinia”. In Greek, Θάρρας means “courage”. If it is true that the Corsican Sardinian block ended up semi-submerged under the sea, or under the Atlantic Ocean, as it was then called, then it is no wonder that the population that remained living on the shores of the sea called their own “courage” city, because it takes courage to live in a city by the sea after the entire Sardinian-Corsican island has half-sunk. Of course, I cannot know the exact reason why they called Tharros “courage”, but this is the best interpretation I have been able to give of the toponymy, at the current moment (11/08/2023).
Sardinia has a complex and layered history, which reflects the various peoples and cultures that have influenced it over the millennia. The Greek presence in Sardinia, although not as extensive as in other parts of the Mediterranean, has left some traces, even in toponymy. Here are some Sardinian places that have toponymic origins linked to ancient Greek culture:
Olbia : Located in the north-east of Sardinia, the name “Olbia” means “lucky” or “happy” in ancient Greek. The city was an important commercial center in ancient times and maintained contacts with the Greek world.
Nora : This ancient city, located near Pula in the southern part of the island, has pre-Nuragic and Punic origins, but also links with the Greek world. Some inscriptions found at Nora are in the Phoenician alphabet but in the Greek language.
Tharros : Another ancient center located in the western part of the island, near Oristano. Although Tharros is most commonly associated with the Phoenicians and Romans, there have been discoveries of pottery and other objects of Greek origin.
Sulcis : The Sulcis region, in the south-west of Sardinia, had contacts with the Greek world, especially through the nearby colony of Cyrene (in Sardinian Libya). Although the name “Sulcis” is probably of Semitic origin, the Greek presence in the region is demonstrated by various archaeological finds.
Pistis : As you said, “Pistis” is both a Sardinian surname and the name of a place in Sardinia. In Greek, “Pistis” represents faith, trust or reliability. Although there is no concrete evidence, it is interesting to note this toponymic connection.
Museums : A place in Sardinia that bears a name that recalls the “Muses”, the Greek deities of music, art and science. Again, it’s difficult to definitively establish a direct link between the country’s name and Greek mythology, but the connection is intriguing.
Neapolis : This name, which in Greek means “new city”, is a rather common toponym in the ancient world. The presence of a “Neapolis” in Sardinia could suggest the foundation or re-foundation of a city in a period of Greek influences or during a period in which Greek was a language of prestige and culture.
Calasetta : Although the name “Calasetta” is not directly of Greek origin, the history of the town is linked to the colonization by families from Tabarka, an island off the coast of Tunisia. And Tabarka, in turn, had roots in the ancient Greek city of Kalè Aktè.
These toponymic connections provide fascinating clues to the complex network of interactions between Sardinia and the ancient Mediterranean world. However, it is always important to do thorough research and look at the historical and archaeological context to confirm any theories or hypotheses about the derivation and meaning of these names.
Importantly, although there are traces of Greek influence in Sardinia, the island is currently believed to have had deeper interactions with other cultures such as the Nuragic, Phoenicians, Carthaginians, and Romans. Therefore, while there are some places with names of Greek origin, it is still believed by scholars that they represent only a small fraction of the island’s rich toponymic tapestry.
Here are some additional Sardinian toponyms that could have Greek origins:
Kalaris : this name could derive from the Greek word “kályx”, which means “cup” or “chalice”, perhaps referring to the shape of the natural port of Cagliari. Tiana : This name may derive from the Greek word “tíanos”, which means “elongated” or “extended”, perhaps referring to the shape or location of the city. Pirri : this name could derive from the Greek word “pyrrós”, which means “red” or “fire-colored”, perhaps referring to the color of the soil or rocks in the area. Monte Astili : this name may derive from the Greek word “ástylos”, which means “without columns” or “unadorned”, perhaps referring to a simple or unadorned architectural style in the area. Tiscali: This name may derive from the Greek word “skális”, meaning “staircase” or “stairway”, perhaps referring to a steep or terraced landscape in the area. Zinnias (Zinnigas) : This name may derive from the Greek word “skínos”, meaning “rush” or “reed”, probably referring to a marshy or marshy area in the region.
These are just some possible interpretations of Sardinian toponyms that could have Greek origins. Toponymy is a complex field and it is always important to do thorough research and consider multiple sources and interpretations before drawing conclusions about the origins and meanings of place names.
Sardinia is indeed a place of great archaeological interest, and the presence of submerged sites, such as Nora and the port of Melqart, adds a further level of mystery and charm to the island.
Norait is one of the most important archaeological sites on the island and represents a fundamental testimony of the Phoenician-Punic and Roman presence in Sardinia. One cannot help but notice that the word “Nora” has a certain phonetic similarity to “Norax”, who in Greek mythology is a giant founder of Nora and son of Hercules, although it could simply be a coincidence. The presence of submerged cities in the Mediterranean, such as Nora or Thonis-Heracleion in Egypt, is evidence of ancient cataclysms and geological changes that have modified the coastline over the millennia. At the time of my last acquaintance (2021), Nora has indeed undergone archaeological research, but the resources devoted to studying submerged cities in the Mediterranean are often limited, and may not be at the level of what we see at other sites,
The submerged port of Melqart represents another significant example of Sardinia’s archaeological richness and its connection with the Phoenician-Punic world. The connection between this port and Hercules is fascinating and could represent a link between myth and reality.
The other sites mentioned, such as Porto Flavia or the various caves, even if not submerged, are of great historical and cultural interest and further enrich the history of the island.
On the hypothesis that Sardinia could be somehow linked to the legend of Atlantis, it is important to remember that the story of Atlantis narrated by Plato has generated countless theories and speculations all over the world, and until now so much concrete evidence had never been found which connect the Sardinian-Corsican geological block to the ancient lost civilisation. However, research continues, and new discoveries could always bring new information.
In any case, it is essential to continue to protect, study and enhance these sites, both to understand their history and to conserve their beauty and cultural value. It would be interesting to see greater investment by local and international authorities in more in-depth research into these sites and in presenting them to the public in a comprehensive and integrated context.
Among the archaeological evidence of the submersion of Sulcis, in addition to the submersion of Nora we have the submersion of the submerged port of Melqart of Malfatano. The submerged port of Melqart, located near Porto Pino in Teulada, is one of the greatest archaeological wonders of Sardinia. It is considered the largest port in the ancient Mediterranean and was used by the Phoenicians, Carthaginians and Romans. The port was described by the Greek geographer Ptolemy in the 1st century AD as the Portus Erculi, dedicated to the god of navigation. It could accommodate up to 400 ships and its ancient grandeur is demonstrated by the walls that tower only two meters below the surface of the water, among schools of fish and dancing algae. The fact that it was called Portus Erculi implies that this toponym could be a confirmation of the passage of the figure of Hercules, until now considered mythological, in these places. As explained elsewhere on this website, Hercules is linked to Sulcis and Southern Sardinia also for the story of the Garden of the Hesperides. According to some archaeologists, the roadstead that opens up in front of Capo Malfatano – whose name derives from the Arabic toponym ‘Amal Fatah’, or place of Hope – would have been the base of the Carthaginian military fleet which controlled the western Mediterranean until 146 BC, year in which the Romans won the last Punic war and took over everything, perhaps up to the Strait of Gibraltar. The true story of that era is still to be reconstructed and told, but in the meantime you can immerse yourself in discovering this mysterious site among the remains of buildings, roads and docks. In addition to Nora, Sulcis also features the submerged port of Malfatano dedicated to Hercules. Archaeological evidence is becoming more and more numerous and consistent with the story that Atlantis is the semi-submerged Corsican Sardinian block. Archaeologists already have a lot of evidence at their disposal. A submerged coastal city and port? It means that they were previously on dry land, and therefore it means that southern Sardinia is subjected to submersions. It is therefore not surprising if at a certain point there may have been a more violent submersion than the others which sank many kilometers of coastline under the sea, killing all the prehistoric populations who lived on the coasts feeding on seafood and hunting. and fishing. The story of Atlantis, which seemed like a mythological tale, now takes on much more credible and probable contours, the archaeological evidence is evident and clear to those who know how to interpret it.
In addition to Nora and the port of Ercole at Capo Malfatano, there are several other submerged structures in Sardinia . Some of these include:
Porto Flavia : Porto Flavia is an ancient mining port located on the south-western coast of Sardinia, near Masua. It was built at the end of the 19th century to transport ore extracted from the surrounding mines. Much of the structure was carved into the rock, with galleries and tunnels extending below sea level. Although it is not completely submerged, it is a unique structure that connects the region’s past mining activity with the sea.
Is Zuddas : These are the Caves of Is Zuddas, located in Sulcis-Iglesiente, a region in the south-west of Sardinia. These caves are famous for their limestone formations and stalactites. Even though they are not submerged, they represent a very interesting cave system that may have played a role in prehistoric life and local imagination. It is in fact possible that the karst phenomenon played a very important role in ancient civilizations. Among the various hypotheses that I can venture, when Orpheus searches for Eurydice it is possible that he entered a system of caves like those of Is Zuddasin Sulcis. Perhaps they were considered Hades. Or perhaps the Sardinians were making fun of the Greeks, making fun of them, telling them lies to make them appear stupid and incompetent or perhaps gullible. In this sense, my vision for the moment diverges from the statements of Giorgio Saba who, if I am not mistaken, places Hades near Sant’Antioco, if I have not misunderstood (I refer the reader to study his work entitled: ” Excuse me, where is Hades? Hypotheses on the ancient history of Sardinia”).
Porto Conte : It is located near Alghero and was a Phoenician-Punic port. Archaeological remains and submerged port structures have been discovered in the bay of Porto Conte, suggesting commercial activities and maritime exchanges in the past.
Grotta dei Cormorani : This is a submerged cave located in Cala Gonone, on the eastern coast of Sardinia. The cave is only accessible via scuba diving and features spectacular limestone formations.
Neptune’s Caves : Although not completely submerged, the Neptune’s Caves are a series of spectacular coastal caves accessible by sea or via a stairway carved into the rock. They are located near Alghero and are famous for their stalactites and stalagmites.
Grotta del Bue Marino : Also located in Cala Gonone, this cave was used in past centuries by sea oxen, a type of monk seal. The cave contains a series of interesting passages and tunnels.
Many of these facilities require access via scuba diving or boat, and some may be subject to restrictions or regulations for the preservation of cultural and natural heritage.
Among the archaeological evidence, there are many more than 7000 nuraghes scattered throughout Sardinia, sacred wells, giants’ tombs and many other structures including Dolmens, Menhirs, Domus de Janas… there are many interesting archaeological discoveries in Sardinia. The island has a rich history dating back millennia and there are numerous archaeological sites and structures that provide valuable information about the past. Some of Sardinia’s most famous archaeological sites include the ancient megalithic buildings called nuraghe, which were built between 1900 and 730 BC. There are nearly 7,000 nuraghi left standing in Sardinia, and some of the most extensive and extraordinary include Su Nuraxi di Barumini and the Nuraghe of Santu Antine. In addition to the nuraghi, in Sardinia there are also several ancient cities that are worth visiting. These include Tharros, which is located on the western coast of Sardinia, and Nora, which is located on the southern coast of the island. Both of these cities have a rich history and offer visitors a glimpse into the past. Other interesting archaeological sites in Sardinia include the statues of Mont’e Prama, the Tomb of the Giants, the Nuragic Village of Tiscali and the Necropolis of Tuvixeddu in Cagliari. These sites provide valuable information on the history and culture of Sardinia and are worth a visit.
Among the possible other evidence of a submergence of the Corsican Sardinian block in the current Mediterranean Sea, there is the presence of many submerged cities. These cities had once been built on dry land: this implies a sinking event within the current Mediterranean Sea: therefore not only the Corsican Sardinian geological block sank, but many cities, villages and inhabited centers, in various historical eras. It is therefore possible that this sinking activity is still ongoing today, with all the risks and dangers that derive from it. Here is a list of some submerged cities in the Mediterranean: Pavlopetri, Greece Baia, Italy Olous, Greece Dolchiste,
Turkey
Atlit
Yam
, Israel
Heracleion, Egypt
Comparison with other Studies : My analysis could gain strength by comparing my conclusions with other scientific studies or archaeological research on Sardinia and the legends of Atlantis. I will therefore create a special session called homonymously: Comparison with other Studies.
Sardo Corso Atlantean contacts with the rest of the world : here is an interesting excerpt from the Archeology Odyssey article “Stone Villages: the Bronze Age Nuraghi of Sardinia” by Robert H. Tykot ( https://www.baslibrary.org /archaeology-odyssey/6/2/3). The article discusses the history of Sardinia during the Bronze Age and how it was once thought to be isolated from the vibrant cultures of the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean. However, decades of archaeological research have shown that Bronze Age Sardinians not only maintained contact with the Minoans and Mycenaeans, but may also have moved to the Middle East. Many scholars identify a people called Shardana, mentioned in a number of Egyptian texts, as Sardis. Pharaoh Ramesses II complained that the Shardana “came boldly with their warships from the middle of the sea, none being able to resist them.” It’s fascinating to learn about the history and culture of Sardinia during this period!
They werefound on Mount Carmel remains of what appears to be a sort of Nuragic village in the land of Israel around the 12th century BC
http://luna.cas.usf.edu/~rtykot/NPR9%20-%20Arch%20Odyssey .pdf
The Nahal Me’arot / Wadi el-Mughara caves are located on the western slopes of the Mount Carmel range and include the Tabun, Jamal, el-Wad and Skhul caves. These caves have been the subject of archaeological research for over 90 years and have revealed a cultural sequence of unparalleled duration, providing an archive of early human life in Southwest Asia. The 54-hectare property contains cultural deposits representing at least 500,000 years of human evolution, demonstrating the unique existence of both Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans within the same Middle Paleolithic, Mousterian, cultural framework. Evidence from numerous Natufian burials and early stone architecture represents the transition from a hunting-gathering lifestyle to agriculture and animal husbandry. As a result, the caves have become a key site of the chronological-stratigraphic framework for human evolution in general and for the prehistory of the Levant in particular. My purely speculative hypothesis is that these places were ancient Sardinian Corsican Atlantean colonies in Lebanon/Palestine/Israel, i.e. in present-day Asia Minor. I therefore assume, on a theoretical level, that in the future numerous other Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean settlements will be found on these lands. In my opinion, it is only a matter of time and improvement of research tools, such as satellite archeology and the massive use of Lidar for the discovery of new remains and ancient settlements. the caves have become a key site in the chronological-stratigraphic framework for human evolution in general and for the prehistory of the Levant in particular. My purely speculative hypothesis is that these places were ancient Sardinian Corsican Atlantean colonies in Lebanon/Palestine/Israel, i.e. in present-day Asia Minor. I therefore assume, on a theoretical level, that in the future numerous other Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean settlements will be found on these lands. In my opinion, it is only a matter of time and improvement of research tools, such as satellite archeology and the massive use of Lidar for the discovery of new remains and ancient settlements. the caves have become a key site in the chronological-stratigraphic framework for human evolution in general and for the prehistory of the Levant in particular. My purely speculative hypothesis is that these places were ancient Sardinian Corsican Atlantean colonies in Lebanon/Palestine/Israel, i.e. in present-day Asia Minor. I therefore assume, on a theoretical level, that in the future numerous other Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean settlements will be found on these lands. In my opinion, it is only a matter of time and improvement of research tools, such as satellite archeology and the massive use of Lidar for the discovery of new remains and ancient settlements. that is, in present-day Asia Minor. I therefore assume, on a theoretical level, that in the future numerous other Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean settlements will be found on these lands. In my opinion, it is only a matter of time and improvement of research tools, such as satellite archeology and the massive use of Lidar for the discovery of new remains and ancient settlements. that is, in present-day Asia Minor. I therefore assume, on a theoretical level, that in the future numerous other Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean settlements will be found on these lands. In my opinion, it is only a matter of time and improvement of research tools, such as satellite archeology and the massive use of Lidar for the discovery of new remains and ancient settlements.
One article of particular note is titled “El-Ahwat: a fortified city of the sea people?” and was written by Israel Finkelstein. It was published in the Israel Exploration Journal , Volume 52, Number 2 in 2002. The article discusses El-Ahwat, an Iron Age I site located on a ridge south of Nahal cIron, the ancient route leading from Egypt and from the coastal plain to the Jezreel Valley and north. The site was excavated by Adam Zertal , who dates it to the late 13th–early 12th century BC and identifies its builders with the Shardana, one of the sea peoples mentioned in Egyptian texts from the 14th to 11th centuries BC and in Ugaritic sources. Its interpretation could have far-reaching implications for the study of the entire Mediterranean basin at the end of the second millennium BC. In this article, the author carefully examines the excavator’s finds and interpretation and argues that El-Ahwat is a typical Iron Age I village inhabited by local people 1 . Iron Age I is a historical period that is part of the Iron Age , which began between 1200 BC and 600 BC, depending on the region, and followed the Stone Age and the Bronze Age. During the Iron Age, people across much of Europe, Asia, and parts of Africa began making tools and weapons from iron and steel 1 . Iron Age I began around 1200 BC in the Mediterranean region and the Near East with the collapse of several major Bronze Age civilizations, including the Mycenaean civilization in Greece and the Hittite Empire in Turkey. Ancient cities such as Troy and Gaza were destroyed, trade routes were lost, and literacy declined across the region 1 .
The Syrtis mentioned by ancient texts:The word “Sirte” derives from the Latin “Syrtis”, which in turn derives from the ancient Greek “Σύρτις” (Súrtis). This term referred to two large sandbars off the coast of Libya, which at this site is the province of Cagliari in present-day Sardinia, and not Libya in Africa. Greater Sirte or Syrtis Major is the Latin name for the Gulf of Sidra, a body of water in the Mediterranean Sea on the coast of Libya, while Lesser Sirte or Syrtis Minor is the Latin name hitherto attributed to the Gulf of Gabès, a body of water in the Mediterranean Sea on the east coast of Tunisia. But by rereading Herodotus and reinterpreting the term Libya as “province of Cagliari”, then the Syrtis could become the Gulf of Cagliari and the Gulf of Sant’Antioco in Sardinia. “Σύρτις” (Súrtis) is an ancient Greek word referring to two large shallow gulfs on the coast of Libya. These gulfs were known to be filled with shallows and sandbars, making navigation difficult for ships. Until now it has been believed that Greater Syrtis, or Syrtis Major, was located on the northern coast of African Libya, while Lesser Syrtis, or Syrtis Minor, was located on the eastern coast of Tunisia. This is wrong and this is the reason why until today an aura of mystery hovered over the places near the Syrtis, namely Lake Tritonide and the Garden of the Hesperides, impossible to find until today because they were looking in African Libya and Tunisia rather than where they actually were, i.e. in the current province of Cagliari in Sardinia. Furthermore, “Σύρτις” can also mean “destruction” or “ruin” in Ancient Greek. This metaphorical meaning derives from the difficulty of navigating these gulfs due to the drag towards the shore. However to this day, there is no historical evidence to suggest that these gulfs were associated with destruction or ruin in the literal sense. They were important trade routes for ancient Greek navigators and other Mediterranean peoples. As already explained in other parts of this website, the Sardinian-Corsican block was surrounded by mud, and the paleocoasts had a very shallow sea, after the semi-submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, so the Greek ships arriving from the parts of the Gulf of Cagliari ran aground. It is very interesting to note that a legend still exists linked to the Church of Bonaria in Cagliari, which talks about a ship that ran aground in the Gulf of Cagliari. My statements are continually confirmed in the real world, in the stories, traditions, languages and dialects of the place, even in the toponymy. The Basilica of Nostra Signora di Bonaria in Cagliari is a very important place of worship in Sardinia, with a centuries-old history which has its origins in legend. According to legend, on March 25, 1370, a ship was hit by a violent storm and in order to survive it was forced to throw all its cargo into the sea, including a heavy wooden chest. Despite the storm, the chest did not sink and the sailors invoked the Madonna. in the local languages and dialects, even in toponymy. The Basilica of Nostra Signora di Bonaria in Cagliari is a very important place of worship in Sardinia, with a centuries-old history that has its origins in legend. According to legend, on March 25, 1370, a ship was hit by a violent storm and in order to survive it was forced to throw all its cargo into the sea, including a heavy wooden chest. Despite the storm, the chest did not sink and the sailors invoked the Madonna. in the local languages and dialects, even in toponymy. The Basilica of Nostra Signora di Bonaria in Cagliari is a very important place of worship in Sardinia, with a centuries-old history that has its origins in legend. According to legend, on March 25, 1370, a ship was hit by a violent storm and in order to survive it was forced to throw all its cargo into the sea, including a heavy wooden chest. Despite the storm, the chest did not sink and the sailors invoked the Madonna. a ship was hit by a violent storm and was forced to throw all its cargo into the sea to survive, including a heavy wooden crate. Despite the storm, the chest did not sink and the sailors invoked the Madonna. a ship was hit by a violent storm and was forced to throw all its cargo into the sea to survive, including a heavy wooden crate. Despite the storm, the chest did not sink and the sailors invoked the Madonna. The storm subsided and the crate reached the port of the city of Cagliari and ended its journey on the slopes of the Bonaria hill 1 2 . The friars opened the chest and found a statue of the Virgin Mary with the Baby Jesus in her arms, holding a candle in her hand that had remained lit despite the sea voyage 1 . This statue became known as Our Lady of Bonaria and became the object of worship of the faithful who climb the steps on both sides of the altar to venerate it 2 .
Reading this story, referring to 1370 AD, it comes to mind that thousands and thousands of years before it was possible and understandable that an ancient Greek ship could run aground on the seabed of the cities and villages that stood in Cagliari on Lake Tritonide. But since Christianity did not exist, while in 1370 religious superstition generated the cult of the Madonna di Bonaria in Cagliari, in prehistory it generated the stories, handed down for millennia, of the Argonauts, of Lake Tritonide and of the tripod given by the Greek sailors to the Sardinians in exchange for hospitality, he generated the story of the Syrtis, the Atlas Mountains and the Garden of the Hesperides.
The Closures Edict: Impacts on Territorial Management and Sardinian Archaeological Heritage:In the 19th century, Sardinia saw the promulgation of the Edict of Chiudende, a fundamental decree that profoundly influenced the dynamics of land ownership and management on the island. In a period prior to this edict, Sardinian lands were generally collectively owned, being used by shepherds and farmers for agriculture and grazing. However, with its introduction, a new order was established, allowing private entities to demarcate and assert ownership over land. Despite the potential interpretation of the edict as an instrument of agricultural modernization and consolidation of private property, it triggered devastating consequences on the Sardinian archaeological heritage. The most complained about aspect of this transition was the uncontrolled use of historical materials, in particular those deriving from the nuraghi: extraordinary megalithic towers, distinctive symbols of the prehistoric culture of the island. Countless land owners, in the construction of fences or buildings, had the possibility of appropriating materials from the nuraghi, compromising the integrity of these ancient structures. This practice has not only resulted in the reduction or elimination of many of these historical testimonies, but has precluded archaeologists from being able to analyze them in their original context. The original number of available archaeological structures has decreased considerably. The erosion of heritage did not end there. As part of excavation work related to fencing or other building initiatives, several residents likely came across buried archaeological artifacts: from bronze figures, to ceramic artefacts, to metal ingots, up to statues of considerable value. Many of these discoveries, rather than being reported to the relevant authorities, may have been kept secret or sold, depriving specialists and the community of a full understanding of their meaning and value. One can imagine that the unauthorized commercialization of such finds fueled a black market, with Sardinian artefacts finding their way into the collections of enthusiasts all over the world, evading the opportunity of correct cataloging and study. In fact, the archaeological sensitivity that we have today is not the same as that of the past: for example, in Sardinia we have testimonies of at least one Pope who gave the order to demolish series of very ancient Menhirs, as they are considered instruments of worship of pagan deities. Once again, here is the Christian religion that tried to destroy the old Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean cults, as they were considered pagan and the fruit of the Devil. In summary, although the Edict of Chiudende had the intent to modernize agricultural practice and land rights in Sardinia, its repercussions on the archaeological heritage proved profoundly negative. The compromise and looting of Sardinian monuments and artefacts embody a persistent shadow in the cultural history of the island, a warning about the balance between innovation and preservation. although the Edict of the Chiudende had the intention of modernizing agricultural practices and land rights in Sardinia, its repercussions on the archaeological heritage proved profoundly negative. The compromise and looting of Sardinian monuments and artefacts embody a persistent shadow in the cultural history of the island, a warning about the balance between innovation and preservation. although the Edict of the Chiudende had the intention of modernizing agricultural practices and land rights in Sardinia, its repercussions on the archaeological heritage proved profoundly negative. The compromise and looting of Sardinian monuments and artefacts embody a persistent shadow in the cultural history of the island, a warning about the balance between innovation and preservation.
The Amazons of Myrina founded a city on Lake Tritonide: therefore the Amazons of Queen Myrina lived in the Province of Cagliari; in partial confirmation of this are all the studies of centuries on the fact that in Sardinia there was a matriarchal civilization; further proof of the existence of female warriors in the past is obtained from research in the Isles of Scilly. Recent archaeological discoveries in the Isles of Scilly, off the coast of Cornwall, have uncovered the remains of an Iron Age warrior. The tomb, located on Bryher Island, contained a sword and a mirror, items which suggest the buried woman was a high-ranking warrior. The discovery was described as “extraordinary” and “unprecedented” by archaeologists who worked on the site. The tomb has been dated to around 200 BC and represents one of the few archaeological evidence of the existence of female warriors in antiquity. This discovery offers new perspectives on the lives of women in ancient times and their participation in military activities. It may also provide further information on the legends of the Amazons, a group of female warriors described in Greek mythology. Sources: BBC News, The Guardian.
The Hesperides Islands (in Latin: Hesperidum Insulae) are islands in the Atlantic Ocean (i.e. in the sea around Sardinia and Corsica until at least the 5th century BC as evidenced by the writings of Herodotus and the statements of Sonchis of Sais) ; in the classical tradition the Hesperides Islands are probably all the islands encountered before reaching the Pillars of Hercules in Carloforte, in particular Sardinia and all the small islands such as Sant’Antioco, Carloforte, the Isola dei Cavoli, Serpentara, to name a few . They are also known by the name of the Islands of the Ladies of the West because the Amazons, i.e. the Ladies of the West, lived there, on Lake Tritonide of Cagliari and its province, up to the current Capoterra.
Possible causes of the sinking of Atlantide Sardo Corsa can be at least three , according to my autonomous and independent reflections: the slab roll back of geological adjustment of the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis island ; the Meltwater Pulses, most notably perhaps the Meltwater Pulse 1b ; I hypothesized the presence of a Wadati-Benioff area under the Sulciswhich starts at least from the Strait of Gibraltar and reaches at least as far as Pompeii and Herculaneum, passing under the Sulcis. This fault, activated in the past, may have caused earthquakes, tsunamis and various destructions, because the epicenter is located right under Sulcis; therefore even minor earthquakes may have been devastating as they were positioned directly under the inhabited, populated area. This fact could also have caused the collapse of Mount Atlas where Poseidon and Clito built the center of the Capital of Atlantis. The collapse of the Mount may have been interpreted by the populations as a divine punishment for the arrogance of the Atlanteans, or for the arrogance of the Sulcitani. The ridiculous thing is that today Sulcis is the poorest area in all of Italy. This is truly a paradox:The date of the sinking of Corsican Sardinian Atlantis has not yet been precisely defined, so in reality the Meltwater Pulses may not be involved in the submersion process . From a geological point of view, there are also at least two points to keep in mind: the Graben-Horst geological structure of various parts of the Corsican Sardinian territory, in particular of Campidano ; secondly, the karst sinkhole phenomenon typical of Sulcis: a violent ingress of water could have created immense damage due to the karst of the place, which still needs to be explored and studied.
present-day Corsica was the mountainous part north of Atlantis ; today an island appears because it was submerged, it is an optical illusion. Corsica and Sardinia were mountain terraces of the island of Atlantis, so after the catastrophic partial submergence they remained out of the water, and today we believe that they are two islands, detached, separate, but this is absolutely not true;
the Sulcis Mountains were called the Atlas Mountains , and took their name from the son of Poseidon called Atlas, the first of 5 pairs of twins, therefore the first of 10 brothers;
Fruttidoro di Capoterra is the Garden of the Hesperides; The Garden of the Hesperides bore golden fruits, and was located at the ends of the known earth; an analogy was found with the apparently mythological story of the Hesperides in Sardinian toponymy: in fact, there is a place called Fruttidoro, located in the town of Capoterra, in Sardinia. Capoterra, from the Sardinian Caputerra, then in Latin “Caput Terrae”, is the “cape of the Earth”, i.e. the extreme edge known in antiquity (Paleolithic/Mesolithic, around 11,600 years ago, to have an approximate but useful date for understanding), while the current location of Fruttidoro in Capoterra would be the legendary Garden of the Hesperides. This new discovery has not yet been counter-validated by scholars, nor have stratigraphies been carried out for the related counter-verification, from Wikipedia we learn that ” The excavations returned various Nuragic and Mycenaean ceramics (coming from Argolis , Crete , and Cyprus [1] ) of the Mycenaean III B and Mycenaean III C types dating back to the 14th – 13th and 13th – 12th centuries respectively BC as evidence of the important exchanges that took place between the Nuragic and Mycenaean civilizations .”Mycenaean pottery is the pottery tradition associated with the Mycenaean period in ancient Greece, which lasted from 1550 to 1050 BC. It encompassed a variety of styles and shapes, including the stirrup vessel, and was heavily influenced by Minoan precedents based on Crete. Mycenaean pottery typically displays stylized representations of marine and plant life and shows an affinity for minimalist linear designs, a trend that would influence early archaic and classical ancient Greek pottery from the 9th century BC Mycenaean pottery produced with the wheel ( 1550-1450 BC) from mainland Greece has been described as “provincial Cretan”, meaning that although it was produced in mainland Greece, it was heavily influenced by Minoan pottery. Manunza wrote about Nuragic and Mycenaean artefacts along a Bronze Age road near Bia ‘e Palma, Selargius (CA) 1 . Furthermore, there is an article by Donatella Salvi on the archaic majolica of the Bia ‘e Palma well in Selargius 2. Therefore the contacts between ancient Sardinians and Mycenaean populations are clearly demonstrated by archaeological and historical data, as well as by the artefacts found which demonstrate a relationship between these peoples. It is therefore not fantasy, but there is concrete, historical, archaeological evidence documented by renowned professionals. The evidence in support of this hypothesis is therefore numerous and localized in several geographical points of southern Sardinia: there is evidence of contacts between Sardinia and the eastern Mediterranean during the Bronze Age. For example, Mycenaean pottery was found in a Nuragic environment 1 . After 1200 BC, with the economic and political collapse of the palace cultures in Mycenae and Crete, only the Cypriots continued trade with Sardinia1. Yes, the Nuragic civilization was not isolated and closed, but fully integrated into the dynamics of commercial and cultural exchanges that characterized life in the Mediterranean in that period. One of the civilizations with which the Nuragic Sardinians had certainly established a relationship of systematic and intense commercial and cultural exchanges was that of the Mycenaeans, interested in the metal trade. Evidence of such relationships has been found in Sardinia in the form of several significant ceramic finds. Well known are the Mycenaean ceramic fragments found in the Antigori nuraghe, significantly located on the southern coast of Sardinia, near Sarroch, but also the so-called “alabastron” found in the Arrubiu nuraghe in Orroli .Equally important and interesting is the ivory head of Mitza Purdia (Decimoputzu) which depicts a character with a helmet completely similar to those described in Homeric works as typical of Achaean warriors. This evidence suggests that the Nuragic Sardinians had established a relationship of systematic and intense commercial and cultural exchanges with the Mycenaeans, interested in the metal trade. Therefore, there is a greater probability that the legend or myth of the Garden of the Hesperides is nothing more than the result of the first contacts between these populations.
If all this turns out to be correct, as is now clear to the writer, it means that at least three Sardinian women from Capoterra were called Hesperides. But then what was this mythological Garden? Is it a structure? Of what nature? Will it be possible, by carrying out core sampling and stratigraphy, to find Neolithic, Mesolithic or Paleolithic remains that can validate that structures, peoples and civilians were present millennia ago? Why Hesperides? Why the name Hesperides? And what really happened?
Now rereading the myth of the Garden of the Hesperides with this new information, it seems that an ancient Greek man named Hercules headed towards the Frutti d’Oro beach of Capoterra, docked and established some form of relationship with the inhabitants of Capoterra. The myth says that his aim was to steal three golden apples. Today, however, we can only make hypotheses: was it an orange plant? Oranges didn’t exist in Greece, and so Hercules was sent to steal three oranges so he could then plant them in Greece and grow them independently?
How was Ercole welcomed by the inhabitants of Capoterra? In friendship? Why are not men mentioned, but the dragon Ladon? What was this dragon coiled around the tree? Did the people of Capoterro give him and his sailor friends something to drink? Did they offer them fruit from a Garden to feed them because on ships they risked catching scurvy? Did they offer him lemons to cure his scurvy? Or what could these “golden fruits” be? Was there really a tree with golden fruit hanging from it, perhaps dedicated to some deity, or did these fruits only have the color of gold? Was it really an apple tree? But then the gold-colored variant of the apple only existed in Capoterra, and did the Greeks “stole” it to plant it in Greece? If this episode has been handed down over the millennia, perhaps it contains some very important information: why was Ercole sent to “steal” from Frutti D’Oro of Capoterra? What exactly did he have to steal? A fruit variant that only existed in Capoterra? This type of philosophical-scientific investigation also requires the contribution of expert botanists, so it is not easy to solve. The paleogeographic part already required combining hundreds of pieces of information from different disciplines.
While the potential discovery, supported by the claims of ancient historians, is extraordinary and jaw-dropping in wonder, it raises far more questions than it answers.
Ercole at Capoterra in present-day Sardinia. But was it already Sardinia or was it still the legendary Corsican Sardinian island currently semi-submerged? When Ercole landed in Capoterra, had the Sardinian-Corsican geological block already sunk?
The Garden of the Hesperides was located in the Atlantic Ocean (Paleolithic), which as explained on the website atlantisfound.it, was the Paleolithic/Mesolithic name of the sea that surrounded the island, then a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean emerged land. The Hesperides Islands must therefore have been the archaic names with which Sardinia and Corsica were defined in the millennia following the semi-submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Hesperidum Insulae, “The Evening Islands”, because at sunset, when the Greeks looked towards the west, sailing in that direction from their most remote position, i.e. with great probability the island of Ischia, they saw 2 distant islands, which today are known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica, and which are plateaus of emerged land of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The linguist and glottologist Massimo Pittau analyzed the location of the Garden of the Hesperides, presumably placing it in Sardinia and pointing out that it was still a legend; I, however, in my bold ignorance, go further and propose that it is not a legend, but a place that actually existed located in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, as stated in other terms by the myth.
Obviously, a serious scholar should study all the toponymy of Capoterra and nearby places, to verify the oldest names that can be traced back and whether in the past they were called in other ways. In any case, a good analysis based on satellite archeology would be appropriate, to highlight very ancient settlements, Mesolithic or Neolithic, present on the site or UNDER the site (because with great probability they will now be submerged by the superimposed layers over the millennia).Following these interpretations, we can analyze other aspects of the mythology: Thetis was a Sardinian. Peleus married a Sardinian, but the Greeks called them “sea nymphs”. The garden of the Hesperides is in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, in Sardinia, between the Atlas Mountains, i.e. the Sulcis mountains, and the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean, i.e. the current Mediterranean. Teti was the eponym of the Sardinian city still called Teti today. Wild boar hunting therefore took place in Sardinia: this custom still exists. By rereading the myth in this key, every piece falls into place and all these stories begin to make perfectly logical sense. In the Paleolithic, the Ocean of Atlantis, i.e. the Atlantic Ocean, was the name that designated part of the current Mediterranean Sea, as in the image below
In light green it is possible to see the whole part of the Corsican Sardinian block which was submerged around 9600 BC by a geological catastrophe, also described in Timaeus, which is a text not only of cosmology, but also of astronomical geography , geography and geology.
But since in the historical period, under the Romans the Atlantic Ocean was named Mare Nostrum, the Paleolithic nomenclature had now disappeared from most texts. However, many scholars and ancient texts still reported the term Atlantic Ocean. Later, it was called the Mediterranean, so the scholars/scientists of the last 2000 years or so focused on looking for the island of Atlantis, i.e. the Sardinian-Corsican geological block semi-submerged in around 9600 BC, in the wrong place: this is why no one has ever found.
If it were proven that the author of the article was telling the truth and that the Garden of the Hesperides was a real place located in Frutti D’Oro di Capoterra in Sardinia, this could have important implications for the understanding of ancient history and mythology. It could provide new information on the spread of myths and legends and their relationship with historical reality. Furthermore, it could stimulate further research and archaeological excavations in the area to look for further evidence to support this theory.
Yesterday afternoon I, Luigi Usai, woke up after a few hours of sleep. I haven’t had a time to sleep for months now: I sleep when I’m exhausted, at any time of day or night, for as long as I need. This favored my dream activity, which will not be the subject of explanations or disclosures here. Yesterday, when I suddenly woke up, I don’t know why I searched for documentation online, stumbling across a text that quoted Herodotus on the Atlanteans:
while I was reading Herodotus’ text translated into Italian I exploded into exclamations of joy: Herodotus’ text speaks of Sulcis in Sardinia! What Herodotus says confirms all my statements relating to Sulcis Capital of Atlantis! I was very excited and full of joy, but at the same time full of sadness: it is impossible to communicate these discoveries to the scientific world. Unfortunately, the majority of scholars are so full of what Blaise Pascal called the “Boria of the Learned”, that it becomes very difficult to share their scientific discoveries.
THE TEXTS OF HERODOTUS’ STORIES SCIENTIFICALLY CONFIRM THAT THE ATLAS PEOPLE ARE ESTABLISHED IN SULCIS, IN PRESENT-DAY SARDINIA.
With this text I invite the World Scientific Community to verify and counter-validate my statements, which will be public from this moment on. Now that the claims that Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican Geological Block semi-submerged in the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean have confirmation in the texts of Herodotus. I publicly and officially ask for verification by scholars from all over the world, in order to bring the knowledge of the Ancient World a few steps further, and allow new discoveries to scholars from all over the world.
Thanks in advance to the Scientific Community.
Slowly, I will paste here a copy of Herodotus’ texts with the step by step explanation via satellite images showing the veracity of what the Greek historian said.
the Atlantic Ocean was the Paleolithic name of the Mediterranean around the Sardinian-Corsican island;
Etymology of Mauretania: Sulcis is inhabited by the Maurreddus. The territories conquered by the Maurreddus were called Maurreddania. In Latin, this geographical name has been distorted, so in some very ancient maps the name Maurrettania is found with two “R”s and two “Ts”. Later Latin prevailed, so Maurreddania became Mauretania, without doubles, which are typical of the Sardinian language. Many people, to imitate the Sardinian pronunciation, still today double the consonants of all Italian words to make fun of Sardinians or to be ironic, both in an offensive sense and in a purely joking and ironic sense. Therefore, if an ancient text states that “Hercules went to Mauritania”, it should be interpreted as “Hercules went to Sulcis”. Present-day Mauritania is probably called this because it was a land conquered by the Sulcians,
The etymology of the name “Mauretania” therefore does not derive from the Latin word “Maurītānus”, which means “Mauritan, [one] of the Moors”, it does not derive from “Maurus” which means “Moor”, from the ancient Greek Μαυρός (Maurós ) ³, but it would derive from the root of the Sardinian term “Maurreddu”, i.e. “Sulcitano”, “inhabitant of Sulcis”. The Sulcis region in Sardinia is inhabited by the Maurreddus, who were later defined as Mauros or Mauri, and due to monophthongization, Mori. The phenomenon by which the diphthong “au” becomes “o” is called monophthongization. Monophthongization is the transformation of a diphthong or triphthong into a long vowel. For example, in the evolution of Latin, the diphthong “au” becomes “o” in words such as “laudo”, “plaudo”, “gaudeo”, which give rise to rustic and vulgar forms such as “lodo”, “plodo”, “god(e)o” 1. Some might object that these are mere theoretical speculations, but in reality these statements are supported by the Sardinian flags and the Corsican flag. The hypothesis that the Mauri or Moors were the Sulcitani of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is interesting, but I have not found evidence to support this theory in my research. However, the Sardinian-Corsican flags present some characteristics that could be interpreted as possible evidence in support of this hypothesis. The flag of Sardinia, also known as the flag of the four Moors, features four black-skinned Moor heads, arranged in a cross of St. George. The flag of Corsica, however, features only one black-skinned Moor. Some theories suggest that the Moors represent the four Saracen kings defeated by the Aragonese during the Battle of Alcoraz in Spain 1. Other theories suggest that the Moors represent the judges of the Kingdom of Sardinia or the four historical judges of the island. But under the powerful light of the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean theory, now the meaning of the flags of Sardinia and Corsica take on a totally new and incredible light: it is a logical reversal. Previously it was believed that it was the African Moors who had conquered, dominated and acculturated the Sardinian Corsicans, while now the principle is reversed: it is the Sardinian Corsicans who have dominated, as Sonchis of Sais had stated in Plato’s Timaeus and Critias, all of the North Africa to Egypt, exporting the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean culture and the megalithic culture, perhaps also for the construction of the Egyptian pyramids. If this last information is true,
Libya, in the 5th century BC, according to the texts of Herodotus and Solon and Plato, was an area in the current province of Cagliari ; the writer Dr. Luigi Usai understood that when Herodotus is talking about Libya, he is not talking about the Libya that we know in Africa, but rather about Libya as a territory in the province of Cagliari . He realized that Antaeus is the King of Libya ; using logical induction, he reasoned that if Libya is a portion of present-day Campidano in Sardinia, and if Antaeus was the King of Libya, then by logical induction then Antaeus was a King of Campidano. Again on an intuitive level, the writer Luigi Usai realized that in fact in Sardinia there is a temple of Antas, which could represent Antaeus as an ancient Sardinian deity. In fact, if the Temple of Antas is dedicated to Sardus Pater, why not call it the Temple of Sardus Pater? These reflections and many others, such as the presence of the Amazons on Lake Tritonide in Libya… but this time, reflecting on the fact that Lake Tritonide is in the South of Sardinia, all Herodotean Geography returns to its place correctly. The Libyan Desert instead would be, according to the writer Luigi Usai, the Sardinian Desert of Porto Pino, which is practically unknown to the whole world except the Sardinians themselves. “Atlantis and the secrets of the Sardinian deserts”When we talk about Atlantis, popular imagination often transports us to distant and mysterious submerged lands. However, the search for this legendary civilization may take us much closer to home than we think, namely to the sands of the Desert des Agriates in Corsica and the Sardinian Libyan desert of Porto Pino. The Desert des Agriates, despite its name, is not a real and truly desert in the traditional sense. It is, however, a wild and rocky area of 15,000 hectares between Saint-Florent and Ile-Rousse. But what connects it to the legend of Atlantis? And how does it relate to the Porto Pino desert in Sardinia? Both the Desert des Agriates and the Sardinian Libyan Desert of Porto Pino share a number of unique geological and historical features. Both represent almost inhospitable regions, dominated by sand dunes and characterized by a landscape that seems suspended in time. Archaeological finds near these areas have shown traces of ancient civilizations, which could suggest that they were once thriving areas, before some major cataclysm or climate change. On this site I declare that, in my opinion, when we say that there was also a desert in Atlantis, we are talking about the Porto Pino desert and the Corsican Des Agriates desertIn conclusion, as the search for the legendary Atlantis continues, it is possible that some of the most significant clues are hidden in the sand dunes of our desert neighbors. And as the mystery of Atlantis slowly unravels, areas like the Desert des Agriates and Porto Pino serve as powerful reminders of the ancient civilizations that once dominated these lands and the secrets they may still hold beneath their sands.
at least the following peoples lived in the territories of present-day Sardinia : Ausei, Maclei, Libi, Atlanti, Ammonii, Nasomonii, Lotofagi, Ethiopian troglodytes; the Giligami are a people of Libya who border the Adirmachids and the Asbists. They inhabit a territory that goes from the Aphrodisias island to the mouth of the Sirte, where silphium is cultivated. The ammonii, on the other hand, are most likely the ones who created ammonia: the Ammonii created ammonia; This is not a joke, I will refine this information as I study the topic, but it is already an excellent starting point for researchers who want to delve deeper into the topic on their own.
In present-day Sulcis there was a desert that flanked at least two salt mountains: one in Carloforte , still present, and one next to Mount Atlas, which now seems to have disappeared (data to be verified) while the other location could be “Perd’ and Sali” which means “Salt Stone” in Sardinian : it would therefore have remained only a toponymic reference to that ancient mountain of salt that was previously present and has now disappeared, perhaps melted by the rains;
the set of lakes of present-day Cagliari and its province were seen as a single enormous lake, which was called Lake Tritonide;
the Amazons of Myrina lived in Lake Tritonide;
Lake Tritonide took its name from an ancient ruler who was then mythologized according to an euhemeristic procedure, as also happened with Poseidon; Lake Tritonide took its name from the ancient ruler Triton, of whom various documents can be found in ancient texts;
archaeologists are aware that ancient Sardinia was matriarchal, but until now I had never heard any archaeologist affirm that the Amazons were Sardinian, nor that Lake Tritonide is in Cagliari and its province, up to Capoterra; I therefore think that these are very original ideas of mine and obviously I am convinced that they are also right ideas, because the whole mosaic puts together all the puzzles that were not clear to me. There were too many incomprehensible absurdities in ancient times, but now, by renaming the satellite maps of Cagliari, Sulcis and Southern Sardinia, everything starts to make perfect logical sense again.
Herodotus reports that the Atlanteans did not dream dreams at night: in fact, the incubation rite took place in Sardinia. Since I have never studied it seriously in my life, I cannot explain what it is, but archaeologists will perfectly understand the implications of this point I am making. This is further evidence in favor of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm. Probably the Sulcitans/Atlanteans were annoyed by the fact that they did not dream, and so the rite of incubation was born for reasons related to the satisfaction of needs of this people that we might never even understand, unless we found new archaeological sources that explain or clarify these facts.
Herodotus mentions in the Histories, chapter IV, of mountains of salt ; I think one was in Carloforte where salt pans still exist today : imagine what it must have been like 2500 years ago! I think there was a second mountain of salt where the Sardinian toponymy still has this name: “Perd’e Sali”, which means “Salt Stone” in Sardinian Campidanese and Sardinian Sulcitano.
Sardinia or Atlantis Sardo Corsa was also called Nesos Espera . The Hesperides Islands are therefore Sardinia and Corsica and the small islands such as S. Antioco and Carloforte; Esperidi is an adjective that designates the women who live in Espera, i.e. in Sardinia; Espera is also the name of the westernmost island that remained on Lake Tritonide in the current Cagliari Ponds. We must therefore be careful not to confuse the term Espera when it refers to Sardinia and when it refers to the island of Lake Tritonide.
In this study, we propose a new perspective for archaeologists regarding the mythological figure of the Minotaur. In particular, we suggest exploring the possibility that the Minotaur is a Sardinian mythological figure, and making comparisons between the Minotaur and the Sardinian legendary creatures Su Boe Erchitu and Su Boe Muliache. These creatures are described as follows: “Su Boe Erchitu is a legendary creature of Sardinian folk tradition. This should not be confused with Su Boe Muliache, another Sardinian legendary creature” (Wikipedia). Furthermore, we propose to examine the possibility that the Minotaur is an ancient Sardinian belief/legend revived in Crete by the Minoans, who were ancient Sardinian-Corsican migrations -Atlanteans in Crete. As is well known, Arthur Evans arbitrarily chose the word “Minoans” to describe this civilization. Furthermore, there is also the androcephalic Bull or bronze statue of Nule, which could confirm these hypotheses. We invite scholars to explore these new paths of thought and to be open to examining possibilities that until now had been excluded a priori. In particular, we suggest re-examining the toponymy of Sulcis, since the names of the towns that refer to the Platonic myth must have a reason. For example, in Carbonia there is a hamlet called “Acqua Callentis”; next door is Caput Acquas; in Nuxis “S’acqua callenti de Basciu”, S’Acqua callenti de Susu; the disappeared medieval town of Acquafredda, which left the Acquafredda castle; the source of Zinnigas; and there are even links to Egyptian toponymy: Heliopolis (city of the sun) and in Sulcis Terr’e Soli (land of the sun, Terresoli). Sais in Egypt and Is Sais Inferiore and Is Sais Superiore in Sulcis. Furthermore, we propose to seriously consider this toponymy and to follow these new unexplored paths. For example, Mesolithic or Neolithic people may have used the terms “goats” or “sheep” or “donkeys” or “pigs” deictically. In fact: Cabras (“goats” in Sardinian) is a surname; it is a locality; it is the meeting place of the Giants of Mont’e Prama; and means goats and has a pond. And right in Sulcis there is the Is Brebeis pond (it means “sheep” in Sardinian) while there is the Molentargius pond (molenti means “donkey” in Sardinian) and there is the Sale Porcus pond (porcus means “pigs” in Sardinian). Furthermore, the Cabras pond is the largest in the world, which may lead us to suppose that it was caused by tectonics or telluric; its duck shape then could have some hidden meaning that we still don’t understand well (the Titicaca has the shape of a puma hunting a viscacha). Finally, we suggest as a first step for archaeologists or superintendents the immediate obtaining of the bathymetries at very high definition of the seabed of all the water basins of Sulcis and Cabras. In particular, we propose bathymetries of the Is Brebeis pond, the Porto Pino pond, the Porto Botte pond and Monte Prano. This would be a great start to explore these new avenues of thought. Furthermore, we suggest thorough checks in all the Sulcis caves up to the layers of 9600 BC and beyond. In summary, This study proposes a new perspective for archaeologists regarding the mythological figure of the Minotaur and suggests exploring new paths of thought regarding the toponymy of Sulcis. We invite scholars to examine these possibilities and pursue these new, unexplored paths. We hope that these proposals will stimulate further research and discussion in this field.
Eumerism : Poseidon was an ancient ruler of the Sardinian-Corsican island, later deified. According to my theory, there is the possibility that in the Sulcis mountains there are still prehistoric remains of the capital of Atlantis, probably covered by debris exactly as happened in Göbekli Tepe. It is therefore a question of applying the same scientific methods to bring to light the historical and scientific finds of the Atlantean past.
The Basque people are an ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migration , clearly visible to those who have the sufficient culture to see it: for this purpose we mention the figure of the Zanpantzar or Joaldun which is a “genetic” variant of the figures of the Sardinian Mammuttones, of the Boes and Sardinian Merdules . The Basque language is also a prehistoric linguistic variant of the Sardinian-Corsican languages and dialects. To better understand this post, see the video on YouTube:
relating to the Carnaval Ituren – Zubieta 2019 Navarra – Pais Vasco and see in particular the figure of the Joaldunak of Ituren ( Ioaldunak à Ituren (Navarre)). Zanpantzar or Joaldun is a traditional character of Basque culture from the Navarre towns of Ituren and Zubieta who announces the arrival of Carnival by shaking their cowbells ( joareak or joaleak ) in the last week of January. There are currently Zanpantzar appares in both Navarre and the Basque Country (text on Zanpantzar translated from Basque wikipedia). The figure of the Zanpantzar or Joaldun are nothing more than “cultural mutations” of the Sardinian masks of the Boes and Merdules, of the Mammuttones and other masks of the Sardinian carnival, which in the Basque countries have changed, as happens in genetic mutations over millennia and millennia. Also note the etymological convergence between the toponyms of Ittiri (Sardinian town) and Ituren (Navarre Basque town). There are several similarities between the Sardinian and Basque languages . According to an article in La Nuova Sardegna, there are hundreds of similar words between the two languages, as well as many linguistic affinities . For example, the holly plant is called “galostiu” in Sardinian and “gorostoi” in Basque.There are also similarities in place names, such as the cities of Aritzo in Sardinia and Aritzu in the Basque Country. I want to add that I have personally noticed two rivers called Arrexi and Arantza, which in my Sardinian Campidanese dialect Asseminese mean respectively “Root” (“Arrexi”, which we can also say “Arrexini”) and “Arantza” or “Arantzu” (i.e. orange ), which we can also say “Arangiu”. Among Sardinians, the variability of linguistic terms is very famous: in Sardinia there are an infinite number of linguistic mutations that Sardinians currently accept, for example the olive, which provides the oil drupe, the fruit of the olive tree, can be called “olia ”, “obia”, meaning “olive”. Now we have incredible linguistic consistencies that only a Sardinian understands intuitively, being due to prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican migrations, because those who speak these languages understand it instinctively. If we then add exclusively Sardinian figures such as the Mammuttones and the Boes and the Merdules, and we realize the existence in the Basque countries of the figures ofZanpantzar or Joaldun, then the fact that the Basques are an ancient Corsican Sardinian migration becomes increasingly clear and evident. In addition to vocabulary, there are also phonetic similarities between the two languages. For example, neither language has the “V” sound, which is present in most Indo-European languages. Both languages also have the “TZ” sound, which is not present in surrounding languages. These similarities suggest that there may have been historical connections between the two regions. Some researchers have proposed that there may have been a prehistoric migration from the Iberian Peninsula to Sardinia, which could explain the linguistic similarities.
It is therefore necessary to establish scientific and academic, as well as archaeological and historical relations between the Basque and Sardinian-Corsican universities, in order to discover all the other relations that show the common prehistoric origins. Until today it has been mistakenly believed that the Basque people came out of nowhere, because their habits and customs and their language were too different from the French and Spanish ones… in reality they were different simply because the Basque people were Sardinians who they migrated from an area of Sardinia, although it is not yet clear which one it was, to colonize those places.
Those who have a careful geographical eye, then, might also happen to notice that the profile of the Sulcis coast and the profile of the Pyrenees coast are almost identical.! (Be careful, this is my personal intuition that hasn’t yet been proven). So the prehistoric sailors who arrived on the coast of the Pyrenees may have felt that geographical place was almost identical to their beloved Sulcis, and perhaps this is one of the reasons that led them to land and try to colonize those places: the sense of familiarity with the Sardinian coast of Sulcis.
Authors of the caliber of Juan Martin Elexpuru they realized the incredible linguistic affinities between Basque and Sardinian, but as has happened for millennia for Sardinia, the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean paradigm was totally overturned: Juan Martin Elexpuru thought that it was the Basques who had “colonized” Sardinia. Instead, the exact opposite happened: it was the Sardinian-Corsicans who colonized the Basque Country, also bringing traditions such as those of the Zanpantzar or Joaldun and the habits and customs and the language. Sardinia and the Basque Country are two European regions that have some cultural and linguistic similarities. In particular, both regions have indigenous languages that are not traceable to any of the Indo-European languages. Furthermore, both regions have an ancient and complex history that has led to the formation of unique and distinctive cultures. However, despite these similarities, the relationship between the two regions has not yet been fully explored. One of the ways to explore this relationship is through the study of population genetics. In particular, the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be made through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations. Furthermore, it could help to better understand the history of Sardinia and the Basque Country and strengthen ties between the two regions. A study published in PubMed compared the mitochondrial DNA of 50 Basque individuals and 50 Sardinian individuals. The study found that the two populations have similar genetic diversity and that both populations have a strong affinity with European populations. Another study published in Nature compared the DNA of 70 ancient individuals collected from 21 archaeological sites in Sardinia with the DNA of other ancient and modern individuals. The study found that the Sardinian population has a complex genetic history and that it presents similarities with European and Mediterranean populations. In conclusion, the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be made through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations.” The study found that the Sardinian population has a complex genetic history and that it presents similarities with European and Mediterranean populations. In conclusion, the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be made through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations.” The study found that the Sardinian population has a complex genetic history and that it presents similarities with European and Mediterranean populations. In conclusion, the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be made through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations.” the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be made through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations.” the comparison between the Sardinian and Basque populations could provide valuable information on the possible common prehistoric origin of the two populations. This comparison could be made through the analysis of the mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA of the two populations. The importance of this comparison lies in the fact that it could provide information on the ancient history of Europe and the migration of prehistoric populations.”
If the Goddess Athena was born on Lake Tritonide , and if my statements prove correct, it means that the ancients were trying to tell us that the Goddess Athena was born in the Lakes in the province of Cagliari. This is incredible: why does the priest of Sais tell Sonchis that Athena founded the first city of Athens and the city of Sais in Egypt a thousand years later ; Athena founded the city of Sais in Egypt 8000 years before Solon’s visit to Egypt, around 590 BC; this implies that Athena, Sardinian goddess, founded the city of Sais around 8590 BC; the Sardinian goddess Athena founded the first Athens a thousand years before Sais, therefore around 9590 BC. One thing still remains to be clarified:the title of Sardinian Athena, goddess of War, was passed as an honorific title from woman to woman in the Sardinian matriarchal system, for thousands of years, just as the title of Pharaoh was passed from father to son in ancient Egypt? Was the goddess Athena Sardinian?Minerva is the Roman equivalent of the Greek goddess Athena. They are essentially the same goddess, but with different names due to the different cultures that worshiped them. Minerva was the goddess of wisdom, war, art, schools, and commerce in Roman mythology, while Athena had similar roles in Greek mythology. According to some recent studies, it is believed that Aeneas (Aeneas) landed in Castro, Italy, where there was a “rock with the temple of Minerva”. So, if all these reasonings are correct, then Athena is of Sardinian origins and the Latin Minerva is a Sardinian goddess. It is therefore possible on a speculative and purely theoretical level that the mother goddess worshiped by the ancient Mediterranean peoples was nothing other than a Sardinian divinity called by many names: Athena in Greece, Minerva among the Romans, Neith or Nith or Nit among the Egyptians,Neith (also known as Nit, Net and Neit) is an Egyptian deity belonging to the religion of ancient Egypt. She was the patroness of the city of Sais in Egypt, the city in which the Egyptian priest known as Sonchis of Sais revealed the history of Atlantis to Solon. In Irish mythology Neit (Néit, Nét, Neith) is a god of war. In my opinion, the civilization that may have transported the cult of Neith – Athena – Minerva throughout the Mediterranean Sea may have been the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean culture, and this explains why the Sardinian Corso Atlanteans brought the cult of the war goddess Neith also to Ireland. In Ireland, Neit was a god of war in Irish mythology. She was one of the Tuatha Dé Dannan, the last group of supernatural men to invade the Emerald Isle. The Tuatha Dé Dannan, largely considered the ancestral gods of the Irish people, are deities of Celtic culture 1 . There is no evidence to suggest that Egyptians ever visited Ireland or that there are any Egyptian finds in Ireland. However, the National Museum of Ireland has a collection of Egyptian finds received during the late 19th century from the excavation divisions of the Egypt Exploration Fund in London, including sites such as Hieraconpolis, Deir el-Bahri, Ehnasya, Oxyrhynchus, Tarkhan and Riqqa 2. At this point it is necessary to introduce other information, to clarify for scholars who want to understand better. Sardinia is full of symbols of the Goddess Tanit. In hieroglyphics, the word Tanit is written and read as Ta Neith, meaning “Land of Neith”. If everything I say is correct, Sardinia is in fact the land of the Goddess Neith, that is, Sardinia is the land of the Goddess Athena, of the Goddess Neith, of the Goddess Minerva. Athena is therefore Sardinian. Since these are very strong statements, it will take time for scholars to find further evidence that confirms my statements, which are too innovative to be believed immediately. Indeed, Sonchis of Sais speaks of the goddess Neith and Athena in the Platonic texts of Timaeus and Critias. In particular, when Sonchis begins to explain in the text of Timaeus, states that the Greeks venerate a goddess who in Greek is called Athena and who in Egyptian is called Neith; Sonchis continues by stating that the goddess Neith-Athena founded the city of Sais 8000 years before, i.e. in 8590 BC, and immediately afterwards states that the Goddess Athena founded the first Athens a thousand years before the city of Sais, in 9590 BC . These dates can be obtained scientifically because Solon’s journey to Egypt dates back to 590 BC, thus allowing us to obtain a series of certain dates to which the story refers.Athena is called Parthenos, which in Greek means “virgin”, because, like her fellow goddesses Artemis and Hestia, she was believed to remain perpetually virgin 1 . The name Parthenon comes from one of Athena’s many epithets: Athena Parthenos, meaning Virgin. Parthenon means “house of Parthenos”, which was the name given in the 5th century BC to the room (cell) inside the temple that housed the cult statue, and from the 4th century BC the entire building acquired the name of Parthenon 2 . I have not found any source that suggests a direct connection between the statue of Athena Parthenos and the Amazons’ habit of not marrying unless one has killed at least one man. However, the statue of Athena Parthenos, sculpted by Phidias, depicted an Amazon fallen onto Athena’s shield 1 . The Amazons were a nation of warriors in Greek mythology, and the subject of the Amazonomachy (battles between the ancient Greeks and the Amazons) was popular in ancient Greek and Roman art 1 . Furthermore, according to some sources, the Amazons were not favorably disposed towards the institution of marriage, but engaged in sexual activities to justify the continuity of their race, with men from neighboring clans, prisoners of war or random men they encountered 2 . Herodotus also stated that the Amazons had a marriage custom that prohibited a young woman from marrying until she had killed a man in battle 3 .
Athena is a goddess in Greek mythology, associated with wisdom, warfare, craftsmanship and the arts. According to Greek mythology, Athena was born from the head of Zeus, fully armed and ready for battle. There is no evidence to suggest that she Athena was originally from Sardinia or that she was worshiped as a Sardinian goddess.Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that Athena’s title was passed from woman to woman in the Sardinian matriarchal system. Minerva is the Roman equivalent of the Greek goddess Athena and had similar roles in Roman mythology. Neith is an Egyptian goddess belonging to the ancient Egyptian religion and was the patroness of the city of Sais in Egypt. In Irish mythology, Neit was a god of war. There is no evidence to suggest that Neith was worshiped as a Sardinian or Irish goddess. Tanit was a Carthaginian goddess associated with fertility, love and pleasure. Many symbols associated with Tanit have been found in Sardinia, but there is no evidence to suggest that Tanit was originally from Sardinia or that she was worshiped as a Sardinian goddess.In reality, the information I have provided about the founding of the cities of Athens and Sais by Athena is not supported by reliable historical or archaeological sources, which is why if it turns out to be correct, it would demonstrate absolute genius, as far as to my current knowledge (19/08/2023) there is currently no other text that states these things; they therefore appear to be profoundly innovative and original ideas in the scientific panorama. Cicero also expressed himself on the identification of the goddess Neith with Athena, in his work entitled De natura deorum book 3, 23, 59. In book 3, 23, 59 of Cicero’s De Natura Deorum, an identification is made between the goddess Egyptian Neith and the Greek goddess Athena. Cicero writes: “And just as we venerate Minerva, so the Egyptians venerate Neith” (Ita ut Minervam nos,
Among the purely speculative statements, I would like to point out that I am evaluating the hypothesis according to which the Troglodyte mentioned in some ancient texts could be the area of Olbia in present-day Sardinia. I have to double check all the sources after having searched and collected them in a single textual point. The city of Olbia was located in the Troglodyte: until now it was thought to be a place on the Red Sea; the Troglodytes were a people who “lived in holes”. Now present-day Sardinia is full of testimonies of “men who lived in natural holes”, i.e. in caves: we have remains in the rock shelter of Sirri in Carbonia, analyzed among others by Professor Carlo Lugliè; we have the remains found in the Lanaittu cave; I have to gather all the other scientific evidence to try to prove these claims. Furthermore, I need to test the hypothesis that there is a correlation in the names of Olbia and Sparta, but for the moment I am not able to provide more details.
I detected an error in the date of the sinking of Atlantis in my own initial hypothesis. 9600 BC is the date of foundation of the first Athens, the one spoken of in Timaeus and Critias, Plato’s famous works. Therefore the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean island cannot have sunk in 9600 BC, because Athens had just been founded, while Sais was founded by Athena, according to what was said by Sonchis of Sais, around 8600 BC. Athens had particular laws, which were later borrowed from the Egyptian legislation of Sais, for example the division into social classes, shepherds, soldiers, priests… Athens became wonderful and capable of extraordinary things, but at a certain point an external power, in The Atlantic Ocean, i.e. in the Sea of Sardinia, attempts to invade the sea on this side of the Pillars of Carloforte now known as the Pillars of Hercules. The date of the invasion, however, is not written: This is the trauma, the serious problem. At this moment we have no clear idea of what date Sonchis is talking to Solon. During the clash between Athens and Atlantis, a submergence phenomenon occurs, during which Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis is partially submerged and the entire Greek army sinks under the sea. Therefore, given that Athens was founded around 9600 BC, given that it became very powerful and extraordinary and capable of incredible feats, it is possible that thousands of years may have passed: it is this very long time that may have made it exceptional: enormous capabilities, very long times prolonged for millennia which may have perfected and refined culture and technique. However, we have the testimony of the Temple of Medinet Abu where it is said that the “Nun came out of his bed”, “The Ocean came out of his bed”: it could really be this, perhaps the episode described by Sonchis to Solon. In this case, the date of submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican paleocoasts would be around 1200 BC and not in 9600.
03/08/2023: I am starting to seriously evaluate the hypothesis that the theft of the Golden Fleece was linked to the theft of sea byssus from Sant’Antioco and its province; now that the Garden of the Hesperides is located in Frutti d’Oro di Capoterra; now that Lake Tritonide is the sum of the lakes that lie between Cagliari and Capoterra; now that the Atlas Mountains are the Sulcis Mountains, everything seems to suggest that the Greeks had heard of the importance of sea byssus for the Sardinians: in fact it is so precious that it cannot be bought with money, it can only be donated. If this was the case millennia ago, then it is possible that the Greeks understood its incredible preciousness and decided to steal the precious Sardinian fabric. This theft would later be mythologized as the Theft of the Golden Fleece. At the moment I am still in the analysis phase of this hypothesis; It seems very plausible to me, but evidence is needed for a possible demonstration. It may be impossible to prove that the golden fleece was a Sardinian sea byssus fabric from Sant’Antioco or the province, however trying is a worthy undertaking. Furthermore, it would bring the mythical tale back to the level of reality. New discovery: today I found the following source online:
“THE GOLDEN FLEECE? It was the BYSUS!” Shardana the Sea Peoples (Leonardo Melis). Accessed August 3, 2023. http://shardanaleo.blogspot.com/2013/09/il-vello-doro-era-il-bisso.html .
which confirms to me that, if I haven’t misunderstood, about a decade ago the very kind Leonardo Melis had the same intuition as me, at least 10 years before me. Incredible. The date of the article is Sunday 29 September 2013, so I had this intuition almost 10 years later. The only difference is that I am providing a disproportionate amount of information to support this, and they all converge towards the confirmation of this hypothesis, which, stated alone, might have seemed impossible. If the hypothesis is correct, if I am not mistaken, it should follow that Colchis was the area of Carloforte, Sant’Antioco, and who knows, perhaps up to Gonnesa, Bacu Abis etc. Now, the next job will be to take up all the texts that mention Colchis and study them one by one until we find information that confirms or denies what is stated here and what was said by the Dear Leonardo Melis before me. Among the ancient texts that speak of Colchis, we can mention the works of Apollonius Rhodes, who in his epic poem “The Argonautics” narrates the story of the Argonauts’ expedition in search of the Golden Fleece. Hesiod, in his “Theogony”, also mentions Colchis as the place where the garden of the Hesperides was located, guarded by the dragon Ladon. Furthermore, authors such as Herodotus, Strabo and Diodorus Siculus provide information on the geography and history of Colchis in their historical and geographical works. So there is a sort of logical coherence: Among the ancient texts that speak of Colchis, we can mention the works of Apollonius Rhodes, who in his epic poem “The Argonautics” narrates the story of the Argonauts’ expedition in search of the Golden Fleece. Hesiod, in his “Theogony”, also mentions Colchis as the place where the garden of the Hesperides was located, guarded by the dragon Ladon. Furthermore, authors such as Herodotus, Strabo and Diodorus Siculus provide information on the geography and history of Colchis in their historical and geographical works. So there is a sort of logical coherence: Among the ancient texts that speak of Colchis, we can mention the works of Apollonius Rhodes, who in his epic poem “The Argonautics” narrates the story of the Argonauts’ expedition in search of the Golden Fleece. Hesiod, in his “Theogony”, also mentions Colchis as the place where the garden of the Hesperides was located, guarded by the dragon Ladon. Furthermore, authors such as Herodotus, Strabo and Diodorus Siculus provide information on the geography and history of Colchis in their historical and geographical works. So there is a sort of logical coherence: mentions Colchis as the location of the garden of the Hesperides, guarded by the dragon Ladon. Furthermore, authors such as Herodotus, Strabo and Diodorus Siculus provide information on the geography and history of Colchis in their historical and geographical works. So there is a sort of logical coherence: mentions Colchis as the location of the garden of the Hesperides, guarded by the dragon Ladon. Furthermore, authors such as Herodotus, Strabo and Diodorus Siculus provide information on the geography and history of Colchis in their historical and geographical works. So there is a sort of logical coherence:if in Hesiod and Apollonius of Rhodes Colchis is the name of present-day Southern Sardinia, the whole discussion becomes coherent and sensible again . However, if all this is true, then it will be necessary to recreate the ancient maps again and reposition the geographical names correctly , to allow new scholars and researchers to avoid making the same mistakes we have made up until today.
Coastal navigation: let’s start from the data. The Uluburun shipwreck is a Late Bronze Age shipwreck dating back to the late 14th century BC 1 . It was discovered near the eastern coast of Uluburun (Great Cape), Turkey, in the Mediterranean Sea. The wreck was discovered in the summer of 1982 by Mehmed Çakir, a local diver from Yalıkavak, a village near Bodrum 1. The navigation of the Uluburun wreck, according to my current state of knowledge, is coastal. This means that with great probability in the 14th century BC people sailed keeping the coasts in sight, in order to save themselves by swimming in the event of the sinking of the naval vessel. Probably, while he was sailing by sight in North Africa, a storm may have pushed a ship of Greek sailors off course, who ended up beyond the Atlantic Ocean, as they then called the Sea of Sardinia and Corsica, according to my theory. Having ended up in what we now call the Gulf of Cagliari, they saw an immense large lake which they called Tritonide, probably after the first contacts with the indigenous people (indigenous means local inhabitants, i.e. the ancient Sardinians). There is also a toponymic correspondence with the Garden of the Hesperides and Golden Fruits of Capoterra, as already explained elsewhere in this text. There is therefore a strong probability that the Faraglioni of Carloforte marked the limit beyond which one could not go because beyond that one would go into the open sea without the possibility of visible coastal navigation. This is why in my opinion that was the limit of the world known by the ancient Greeks, at least in the 14th century BC. So in my opinion the known limit was not the Strait of Gibraltar, but the Pillars of Hercules of Carloforte in Sardinia as defined by Professor Giorgio Saba. By moving the Pillars of Hercules it is possible to understand what Sonchis of Sais was stating in his speeches to Solon; it is possible to macro-localize the toponymic position of the Garden of the Hesperides; you can find Atlantis and the Atlas Mountains. It is possible to locate what Lake Tritonide was and its position: with my general theory it is possible to understand why various authors talk about North Africa: Cagliari is REALLY positioned north of Africa, only that it is separated by a short stretch of sea . But until now, scholars have interpreted the phrase North Africa literally, mistakenly believing that they were talking about the northernmost part of the African territory, i.e. present-day Tunisia or Libya. All the Mycenaean finds in our possession show archaeologically and scientifically the contacts between the Mycenaean Greek populations and southern Sardinia, empirically confirming, at least on a theoretical level, what I stated. Until now, the scientific paradigm has been to hypothesize the Pillars of Hercules in Gibraltar and the Atlantic Ocean beyond, but this paradigm appears to be inaccurate: the Pillars ended up in Gibraltar only many centuries or millennia later. Before this, the true and most ancient Pillars of Hercules were located in what today we call Faraglione Antiche Colonne di Carloforte, between the islands of Carloforte and Sant’Antioco. Professor Giorgio Saba’s discovery is extraordinary, breathtaking. This new, precious information puts Sardinia, and consequently the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, at the extreme western limit of the ancient Greek and Mycenaean world. This paradigm shift leads us to imagine the first linguistic and cultural exchanges between these peoples, whereby linguistics is fully affected by the consequences of the statements made here: the ancient Mycenaean and Sardinian languages mixed, with contaminations deriving from the prehistoric contacts between these populations. Therefore it is necessary to restore the dignity of study to the Sardinian languages and dialects, to Sardinian culture in general, which seems to have been ignored or downgraded for a long time, deprived of its real importance for the ancient world. In Italy we study ancient and modern Greek, ancient, classical and medieval Latin at university, but no one seems interested in studying languages, Sardinian dialects neither ancient nor modern, it’s as if we were ashamed: Why? Why have we caused these ancient and modern languages, dialects and cultures to lose the dignity of teaching? The Sardinians themselves are ashamed of their language, and when they use it it almost seems as if they are “contaminating” the Italian language. This absolutely needs to change. We must put Sardinia and the Sardinian-Corsican block back in its place in antiquity and history, in geography and linguistics, in the history of trade and cultures and tourism. This is what real scientists would do. However, the problem becomes more complicated: for now we have in fact been talking about Sardinian languages and dialects, and we need to clarify; from the fourth book of Herodotus’ Histories, if we interpret the current province of Cagliari as Libya, we deduce that the south of current Sardinia was a melting pot of peoples and cultures, not a single identity:
At this point I would like to underline an intuition that I had and which could have interesting implications. At the moment it is only a hypothesis without certain foundation, purely speculative. I was struck by the homonymy between the Pyramid of Giza and the Gizanti people. After having already shown in these texts the strange proximity between ancient Egypt and the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean peoples, I would not be surprised to discover or, who knows, perhaps demonstrate, later, a possible relationship between the Gizanti people of Colchis in Sardinia and the construction of the pyramid of Giza. It is an abstract hypothesis, completely out of the blue, but it can be an intriguing new avenue of study and creative research, even if it turns out to be totally incorrect and unfounded.
Geocriticism is a method of literary analysis and literary theory that incorporates the study of geographic space. Using this method, we can examine how the theories of the writer Luigi Usai on the discovery of Atlantis, the Garden of the Hesperides, Lake Tritonide, the Amazons of Myrina relate to geographical space, in particular to ancient geographical space and to the new reintegration of Sardinia and its islands within ancient mapping systems. If what is stated on this site and in the books published by Luigi Usai, then it will be necessary to create ancient cartography again, to facilitate the work of learning about antiquity for the new generations of scholars, historians, geographers, philologists, philosophers, geologists and so on. . According to Luigi Usai, the Pillars of Hercules are located in Carloforte as stated in Giorgio Saba’s book, near the island of San Pietro, in Sardinia. Giorgio Saba’s discovery offers us a new perspective on the geography of Sardinia and its relationship with ancient mythology. Furthermore, Luigi Usai proposed that Sulcis is the capital of Atlantis and that Atlantis is the partially submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. These theories offer us a new understanding of the geography of Sardinia and Corsica and their relationship with ancient history. Geocriticism allows us to examine how these theories relate to geographic space and how this impacts our understanding of ancient history. For example, we can examine how the location of the Pillars of Hercules in Carloforte influences our understanding of ancient mythology and the geography of Sardinia. Furthermore, we can examine how Luigi Usai’s theory of Atlantis and Sulcis influences our understanding of the geography of Sardinia and Corsica and their relationship to ancient history.
Tamil Nadu Jallikattu: I’m starting to think that this rite could be of Sardinian Corsican Atlantean derivation as well as the bullfight and games with the bulls of the Cretans. This hypothesis must be studied in depth for possible consequences, for example of a linguistic nature.
Different cultures around the world have developed practices and rituals involving bulls or other large animals. Here are some of these practices that could have superficial similarities with the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean bullfighting and which in my opinion could have very remote common origins in the Sardinian-Corsican culture:
Course camarguaise (France): This is a form of traditional bullfighting in the Camargue region of southern France. Unlike Spanish bullfighting, the objective is not to kill the bull. Rather, raseteurs attempt to remove a ribbon or rosette from the bull’s horns using only one hand.
Bous al mar (Spain): In Denia, in the Valencia region of Spain, an event called “Bous al mar” (Bulls at the sea) is held. The bulls are raced along the streets to a pier, where spectators try to knock them into the sea, while trying to avoid being pushed into the water by the bull.
Rodeo (United States and Canada): Although the roots of rodeo are different from bullfighting practices, it shares the element of men seeking to dominate or display skill against a powerful animal. Events include bull riding, bronchi (wild horse) riding, and lassoing.
Zampanzar (Spain): During the Saint Sebastian festivities in some parts of Spain, a bull with a set of rockets tied to its horns is released into the streets. Spectators try to run and get close to the bull without being hit by the rockets.
Coleo (Venezuela and Colombia): Although it involves horses rather than bulls, Coleo is a sport in which riders try to take down a bull or cow by pulling it by the tail.
Buffalo Racing (India and Thailand): In coastal regions of India, such as Karnataka, and in Thailand, buffalo racing is traditional. Although it does not directly involve the fight between man and animal, it shows a display of strength and speed between the animals, often with men trying to control them during the contest.
Cretan Bullfighting: The oldest depictions of bull games are found in the Minoan art of ancient Crete (circa 2000-1400 BC). They show young athletes jumping on the backs of bulls or doing acrobatics. It is unclear whether these were religious rites, sporting activities, or both. There is no indication that bulls were killed in these events.
Bullfighting: Spanish bullfighting is a form of bullfighting in which a bullfighter, or matador, fights a bull in a series of stages culminating in the killing of the bull. It has ancient origins and can be traced back to ancient Rome, but the modern form has medieval origins. It has a deep cultural and ritual connection in Spain and other parts of the Spanish-speaking world, but is also controversial due to animal rights issues.
Jallikattu: Jallikattu has roots in the harvest celebration of Pongal in Tamil Nadu. It’s not a bull-killing sport; instead, the goal is to tame the bull or hang on to it. However, it has sparked controversy and debate over animal rights in India, leading to temporary regulations and bans.
A hypothesis that at the moment I am not yet able to elaborate better is the following: the languages hitherto called Indo-European could actually be Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean languages. It is possible that the Sardinian-Corsicans, in the remote past, may have also reached India, creating some ethnic groups that remained there; given the practice of Jallikattu and for other reasons that I cannot list for now, I hypothesize that some Indian ethnic groups, for example the Tamils, are of Sardinian-Corsican origin. They would therefore have linguistic and ethnocultural points in common. This, however, is an exclusively theoretical-speculative hypothesis which does not yet have solid foundations. But I want to point it out, in case others notice and think they are the first to have thought of it.
The submerged city of Athens from 9600 BC was found by Luigi Usai in the Sicily Malta platform.
Atlantis had a circular shape with concentric channels that connected the sea to the central city; this form is found in the three-dimensional backdrops of the Sardinian-Corsican block.
Atlantis was rich in precious metals such as gold, silver and orichalcum; these metals are also present in the Sardinian-Corsican territory.
The archaeological evidence has never been found because it has never been looked for: this is because the Sardinian academic and archaeological world, in general, has always considered the discussions on Atlantis as Plato’s fable tales with literary, political or philosophical intentions. Therefore, no one has carried out stratigraphic archaeological excavations in Sardinia that reached 9600 BC.
No one to this day has yet discovered the size of Libya and Asia in 9600 BC; no one, to this day, even has any idea what these words represented, before the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean blockade in about 9600 BC; however, it is possible to reason in the opposite way, and consequently determine that Libya and Asia were in 9600 BC two geographical realities with dimensions smaller than those of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently submerged under the Mediterranean.
Underwater bathymetric anomalies have been detected throughout the present-day Mediterranean Sea. In particular, on the Sicily-Malta carbonate continental shelf, geometric shapes have been detected that suggest at least two clear possibilities: the first that they are underwater artefacts, that is, in the jargon of experts, apparently anthropic shapes that derive from the poor processing of bathymetric data through the appropriate software currently in use; the second, that they are remains of an anthropic nature, in particular of some form of prehistoric inhabited center of which the memory has been lost. Various books have currently been published by the writer Doctor Luigi Usai regarding this information, which still remains under scrutiny by the Scientific Community.
Luigi Usai stated in one of his books that the Villanovan civilization was a Sardinian-Corsican migration to Italy. And in fact a Nuragic bronze was found just a few days ago in Lake Bolsena, belonging to the Villanovan civilization, and it is the only one found inside a Villanovan house, currently submerged under Lake Bolsena.
Among the geological evidence, the mud that surrounded the island of Sardinia-Corsican Atlantis was caused by the sea undertow on the coasts, which stripped the island of the soil of the original paleocoasts inhabited by the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans. The Atlantean paleocoasts are today called by the scientific world the “Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf”.
In the “Su Carroppu” rock shelter in Sirri, Sardinia, Mesolithic inhabitants were found, who according to my theory are most likely Atlanteans. In fact, two out of three individuals have allowed the analysis of their DNA, which is almost totally different from that of the Neolithic people who colonized the island approximately three thousand years later, i.e. approximately 3000 years after the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block -Atlantean. Consequently, a great deal of information can be derived from this discovery: for example, the Atlanteans inhabited the paleocoasts of the Sardinian block; they had different DNA; they preyed on marine resources in particular, which is in keeping with the fact that these people worshiped Poseidon, the “God of the Sea”.
The discovery of the statue of Atlas from the Olympeion would indirectly confirm that around the 5th or 4th century BC the Sardinian Atlantean figure of Atlas was still highly venerated in Sicily. The fact that it is called “Telamone” in Italian shows how it seems that archaeologists, even if unconsciously and involuntarily, do everything possible to erase the Atlantean terminology: in fact abroad it is called Atlas in the main world newspaper articles who talk about it. Furthermore, the statue of Atlas is of immense size, which suggests that he was a much loved, venerated and respected figure.
The Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, being a seafaring people, may have spread some stone-working techniques such as Clactonian and Tayatian along the Atlantic coasts of Europe during their explorations and migrations. This would explain the presence of similar megalithic structures in very distant places. The hypothesis that the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, a people of skilled navigators and seafarers, spread stone working techniques such as the Clactonian and Tayacian along the Atlantic coasts of Europe during their explorations and migrations is fascinating and opens up different study perspectives. This theory suggests that the knowledge and skills developed by this adventurous population may have had a lasting impact on the construction of megalithic structures in distant places. The Clactonian and Tayacian are considered two phases of the Lower Paleolithic, characterized by the use of chipped stones and the production of rough stone tools. If the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans had been able to spread these techniques along the Atlantic coasts, they could have directly influenced the creation of megalithic monuments such as dolmens, menhirs and megalithic complexes in different places. This would explain the similarity in stone-working techniques and architectural styles between different geographic regions. Their advanced navigation skills would have made them capable of moving along marine trade routes and colonizing new lands along the Atlantic coasts of Europe. During these journeys of exploration and migration, they may have spread their stone-working skills, paving the way for the construction of similar megalithic structures by local populations. The presence of similar megalithic structures in distant places could be the result of this exchange of knowledge and skills between Sardinians. Atlantean courses and local communities along the Atlantic coasts. This phenomenon could also explain why we sometimes see similarities in the names of megalithic sites in different places, such as Karnak and Carnac, which could be a reflection of the spread of the culture and language of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans. This theory adds an interesting element to our understanding of the diffusion of technologies and cultures in the ancient world.The Clactonian is a phase of the Lower Paleolithic, a prehistoric period characterized by the use of chipped stone tools and a material culture associated with nomadic hunter-gatherer groups. This phase takes its name from the location of Clacton-on-Sea in Essex, England, where the first finds belonging to this archaeological tradition were discovered. The Clactonianit is dated to approximately 400,000-300,000 years ago and represents one of the earliest expressions of the intentional use of chipped stones for the production of tools and instruments. This phase is part of what archaeologists call the “chipped lithoid industry,” in which stones were deliberately chipped and worked into tools useful for various purposes, such as cutting, scraping, and drilling. Clactonian tools include spearheads, scrapers, and other sharp tools. The main characteristics of Clactonian tools include rough workmanship, where stones were chipped to create sharp edges without particularly careful finishing. This rough workmanship may have been the result of the use of tools for specific tasks and the need to replace them frequently.The Clactonian cultureit has been associated with nomadic human groups who depended on hunting, fishing and gathering food resources in coastal areas and surrounding environments. Although there is still ongoing research and discussion about the geographic scope and spread of this culture, archaeological evidence indicates that Clactonian tools were found in several parts of Europe, especially along the Atlantic coasts. The Clactonian represents a primordial phase of the evolution of human technology, where chipped stone tools were used purposefully to perform daily tasks and survive in the surrounding environment. This phase laid the foundation for the subsequent development of complex stone tool industries throughout the Lower Paleolithic. The Tayacianis another important phase of the Lower Paleolithic, located chronologically after the Clactonian. It takes its name from the archaeological site of Le Moustier, located in Tayac in France, where finds belonging to this archaeological tradition have been identified. The Tayacian is dated to approximately 300,000-200,000 years ago and is considered a continuation and evolution of technical traditions and cultural events that began with the Clactonian. At this stage, humans continued to use chipped stone tools, but some significant modifications and developments occurred in stone processing and the tools produced. One of the defining characteristics of the Tayacianit is the introduction of a more refined processing of the stones. Tayacian tools are often associated with greater precision in shaping and sharpening tool edges, suggesting improved technical skills in the art of stoneworking. Tools from this phase include spearheads, scrapers, blades, and other tools, often made using several stages of chipping to achieve specific shapes and functionality. One of the significant discoveries associated with the Tayacianis the use of stone tools made using the Levallois technique, a controlled chipping technique that allows stone chips of a specific and predefined shape to be obtained. This technique represents a step forward in humans’ understanding and mastery of stoneworking. Culturally, the Tayacianrepresents a stage in the evolution of prehistoric societies, in which technology and technical skills gradually improved. The spread of the Tayacian was identified in several parts of Europe, demonstrating that this phase had a wider geographic scope than its predecessor, the Clactonian. In summary, the Tayacian is a key phase in the path of development of human technology during the Lower Paleolithic. This phase saw improvements in stonework and the art of controlled chipping, paving the way for further technological and cultural developments in the later phases of the Paleolithic.
The similar names of some sites, such as Karnak and Carnac, could be an echo of the cultural domination and spread of the language of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans in a very ancient era. Many place names have prehistoric origins.
The construction of megalithic structures required social organization and the dissemination of specialized knowledge. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans may have transmitted this knowledge to local populations during their explorations, allowing the construction of similar monuments throughout Europe.
Plato placed Atlantis in the Atlantic Ocean. The Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, being an insular people, may have actually dominated much of the trade routes and cultural exchanges in the prehistoric Atlantic, as Timaeus and Critias suggest.
Some important megalithic sites, such as Stonehenge, may have been influenced, or even built, by the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, given their presumed cultural and maritime influence on Western Europe: in fact, before the Stonehenge megalithism was created it was built in the center of current Sardinia the megalithism of Pranu Mattedu.
In Europe there are many cases of alloglossia. In my opinion, several of these alloglossies, such as the Gallo-Italic dialect variants in Sicily and Piedmont, Veneto, Romagna and Tuscany, can be attributed to linguistic remains of the Mesolithic and Neolithic Sardinian-Corsican colonization throughout Europe, an Atlantean colonization which the priest of Sais in Egypt in Solon, in the Platonic texts of Timaeus and Critias.
A load of orichalcum was found in the seas of Sicily, right near the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block : this discovery is described in numerous newspaper articles that have traveled around the world: here is a short list, which you can double-check online and on search engines
https://www.famedisud.it/dal-mare-di-gela-riemerge-loricalco-il-leggendario-metallo-di-atlantide-un-tesoro-di-26-secoli-fa/ https://mondointasca.it/2015/01/07/oricalco-il-misterioso-metallo-di-atlantide-ritrovato-a-gela/#:~:text=Come%20il%20tempo%20e%20la,secolo% 20a.C.%2C%202600%20anni%20fa.https://culturattualita.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/oricalco-legendario-metallo-di-atlantide-trovato-al-largo-della-sicilia/https://caltanissetta.gds.it/video/cultura/2015/03/02/nel-mare-di-gela-lingotti-di-2600-anni-fa-video-c99e3503-14fc-4e1e-b888-334d14fa3da1/
Sardinia, with its rugged geography and its deep caves, has always aroused the interest of archaeologists and historians. The presence of speleological complexes such as the Is Zuddas Caves in Sulcis and many others scattered across the island suggests that these places may have offered refuge and home to human groups in antiquity. Herodotus, the famous Greek historian, speaks of the Troglodytes, a well-known people to live not in built homes, but in “ravines” or natural caves. The name “Troglodytes” literally means “hole dwellers”. For about 2600 years Herodotus’ descriptions were believed to refer to peoples located in regions far from Sardinia; currently, in light of the new information that has emerged from the analyzes of this website, it is plausible to hypothesize that on the island of Sardinia there were ethnic groups with similar habits or even that Sardinia was the place from which the Troglodyte people originated and then spread to the rest of the world. On a speculative level, it is even possible to make a comparison with the people who inhabited the Qumran Caves. This theory finds further foundation in the numerous archaeological discoveries made in different areas of Sardinia. The Pirosu Cave of Su Benatzu, for example, has revealed traces of human settlements. Similarly, the Lanaittu cave offered tangible evidence of human presence, as did the rock shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri, in the province of Carbonia, where remains dating back to 11,000 years ago were discovered. Neptune’s Caves in Alghero, famous for their extraordinary beauty, they have also revealed signs of human presence in prehistoric times. It should be underlined that life in caves, although present, does not necessarily imply a primitive life or one devoid of cultural evolution. Often, caves were used as temporary shelters or sacred places, rather than as permanent homes. Furthermore, in a geographical context such as that of Sardinia, characterized by a mountainous territory and an at times severe climate, the caves could offer protection and security. In conclusion, without drawing definitive conclusions, the numerous findings and the geographical nature of Sardinia indicate that cave life may have been a significant part of the island’s prehistoric history. As always,
New speculative hypotheses on the Lotophagi people and on Polyphemus: today’s date 14 August 2023. For months now I have been starting to think that the land of the Lotus Eaters is located in Sardinia, and I am evaluating the hypothesis that the lotus fruit was actually something like the Sardinian myrtle. In fact, the Lotus Eaters were a hospitable people, and they offered the fruit of the lotus (perhaps myrtle) to the people they hosted. The people hosted therefore forgot everything because the myrtle made them drunk, and the jovial and hospitable climate induced them to stay as guests and “forget their homeland and family”. Regarding the possibility of the presence of Polyphemus or the myth of Polyphemus in Sardinia, there are many sources that could lead a Sardinian to confirm the hypothesis: in fact in Sardinian archeology there are many very ancient structures which are called in the Sardinian language: the house of the ogre (“Sa Domu ‘e S’Orcu” in the Sardinian language). It is probable that these structures are linked to the myths of the orcs or the presence of mythological figures such as those of Polyphemus: they were probably very ancient tales to scare travelers or they could have been tales that were told to prevent anyone from exploring and learning about areas Sardinian geographical areas covered by secrets of various kinds, for example commercial or mining: for example, in order not to reveal that in an area there was a mine very rich in a certain mineral, they could invent stories to keep people away from that place.
Possible archaeological misdirections for scholars : it is possible to analyze this article to note the following fact: archaeologists often “attribute” a temple to a deity, for a thousand reasons. After decades and decades that a temple has been attributed to a Goddess, for example the Goddess Hera – Juno, no one would dream of questioning her attribution anymore. Something extraordinary must happen, such as the discovery of a head of the goddess Athena: then everything is called into question, and it is estimated that temple D in the Valley of the Temples of Akragas (in ancient Greek: Ἀκράγας), hitherto attributedto the Greek goddess Hera (Juno for the Romans) is actually a temple of the goddess Athena. Now we must multiply this fact by hundreds and hundreds of attributions that have been made to date, completely excluding the possibility of Sardinian-Corsican influence in the Mediterranean. Having done this, we can begin to mentally tune into another wavelength, which allows us to understand that the Sardinian-Corsican civilization has been snubbed, avoided, forgotten, discarded for millennia, despite the thousands and thousands of nuraghes, wells sacred buildings, giants’ tombs, domus de janas, dolmens, menhirs, which are typical of ancient Corsican Sardinian architecture and landscape and still visible to the public today, while many other works lie underground yet to be excavated.
08/17/2023 From all my little research, I have the intuitive feeling that Samothrace is somehow linked to the Sardinian-Corsican geological block , but I still don’t understand why my subconscious is linking these two locations. I need to study a lot, to better understand what pushed my brain to connect these distant places. At the moment I only want to report this feeling of mine to my two or three occasional readers, whom I greet with great affection.
Herodotus speaks of the city of Barce or Barcei, and in Sardinia there is the city of Burcei. Even if it were my interpretation error, I want to try to force Herodotus’ interpretation and analyze this variant. 08/18/2023 I believe that the city of Barce or Barcei was near Oristano, but for now I will force the interpretation on Burcei, to memorize all this data, which is new to me.
Strange similarity between the mythical figures of Hercules and Samson : both Hercules and Samson are heroic and mythological figures coming from different cultural traditions, but with some similarities in their traits and exploits: this may suggest a common origin of this mythical tale. Why would this be a myth? Because to date there is no scientific basis that states that a human being has superhuman strength due to the length of his hair, as in Samson, so it must be a sort of mythical tale, probably adapted to the needs of the people of Israel. Here are some points of contact between the two figures:
Superhuman Strength : Both Hercules and Samson are known for their incredible physical strength. Hercules is famous for having accomplished twelve extraordinary labors which demonstrated his superhuman strength, while Samson is known for his extraordinary strength which allowed him to face challenges and enemies.
Heroic Deeds : Both characters performed heroic deeds that defied their physical abilities. Hercules faced wild beasts, monsters, and impossible situations as part of his labors. Samson faced lions and Philistine soldiers similarly, demonstrating his exceptional strength.
Ties to the Gods : Hercules is considered a demigod, son of Zeus. He received the help and support of the gods in his undertakings. For his part, Samson was given birth by his mother after a divine announcement and, according to the biblical story, received superhuman strength from God.
Weaknesses and Betrayals : Both characters have been betrayed by women. In the case of Hercules, his wife, Deianira, unintentionally poisoned him with the blood of Nessus. In Samson’s case, his betrayal at the hands of Delilah led to his capture and his loss of strength.
Victories over Death : Both Hercules and Samson had fateful encounters but found a way to win over death. Hercules, after his death, was welcomed into the gods of Olympus and obtained immortality. Samson, even though he died destroying the Philistine temple, killed many enemies in the act, proving his strength to the end.
Legendary Cultural Relevance : Both figures have been a source of inspiration for stories, myths and artistic depictions in various cultures. Hercules is a key figure in Greek and Roman mythology, while Samson is an important figure in Jewish and Christian tradition.
It should be noted that while there are definitely some similarities between Hercules and Samson, they are also distinct characters with roots in different cultural contexts (Greek and Biblical mythology, respectively). Their stories and characteristics may vary based on the sources and specific traditions in which they were passed down.
The Maskinganna is a legendary character of Sardinian folklore known for his ability to make fun of sleeping people, making them wake up terrified. His peculiarity is that he can take on any form ; sometimes it took the form of a crying child, other times of a beautiful boy (or girl) who appeared for an instant and disappeared immediately afterwards. On the other hand, Proteus is a character from Greek mythology . He was a deity of the sea, rivers and expanses of water, as well as an oracle and shape-shifter . Proteus had the ability to peer through the depths of the sea and predict the future of whoever was able to capture him.He was also able to take on any appearance to escape his interrogators . Both characters, Maskinganna and Proteus, have the ability to assume any form . However, while Maskingannauses this ability to make fun of people, Proteus uses it to escape from those who question him. Furthermore, while Maskinganna is a character from Sardinian folklore, Proteus is a deity from Greek mythology with oracular powers. These differences make the two characters unique and interesting in their own way, but what we want to underline here is the incredible similarity of Sardinian mythologies, sagas and legends with those of other places in the Mediterranean: there is an incredible similarity between the figure of the Maskinganna and the figure of Proteus in ancient Greek mythology, an incredible similarity between the Sardinian figure of the Sculptor and the story of Medusa, between the figure of Hercules and that of Samson… little by little a sort of closeness seems to emerge in the stories and mythologies that were not so obvious to the reader before.Proteus, Maskinganna, and Silenus: A Comparative Analysis of Mythological Figures In the mythologies of different cultures, mythological figures embodying deception, metamorphosis, and mystery are present in many forms. Three particularly fascinating figures in this context are Proteus in Greek mythology, Maskinganna in Sardinian folklore tradition and Silenus in Greek mythology. Proteus, also known as the “Old Man of the Sea” , is a marine deity in Greek mythology. The fact that Proteus is called “the old man of the sea” does nothing but recall the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean theme of the sea, oceans and water, further confirming the possible relationships between the myth of Proteus and the Sardinian Corsican block Atlantean. He is famous for his ability to shape-shiftand for its role as guardian of the secrets of the sea . According to Homer, Proteus knew everything about the oceans and possessed knowledge of future events, but he was reluctant to reveal this wisdom. Maskinganna is a mythological figure of the Sardinian tradition who appears in the countryside and in the woods. Described as a “prankster demon”, he takes many forms and loves to make fun of humans. Silenus is a figure in Greek mythology known for being a companion of Dionysus, the god of wine and feasting. He used to be represented as an old man with the ears and tail of a horse, and was known for his wisdom and knowledge. Both Proteus and Maskinganna share the ability to shapeshift. While Proteus does this primarily to escape capture, Maskinganna uses this ability to scare and deceive. Both figures operate with a sense of deception, but while Proteus holds secret wisdom, Maskinganna uses his deception to mock others. On the other hand, Silenus was known for his wisdom and knowledge, but did not use deception as a means to protect it. All three figures are closely linked to their natural environment: Proteus with the sea, Maskinganna with the countryside and woods and Silenus with nature in general. This bond emphasizes their role as guardians or manifestations of the forces of nature. Proteus , Maskinganna and Silenus, although belonging to different cultures and contexts, show striking similarities in their multifaceted nature (for Proteus and Maskinganna) and in their deceptive behavior (for Proteus and Maskinganna). All three represent enigmatic and mysterious aspects of the natural world, serving as powerful symbols of the uncontrollable forces and hidden truths that populate our world. This comparative analysis could pave the way for further studies on the transversality of mythological figures and the universal representations of deception and metamorphosis in different cultures. Furthermore, it may be interesting to further explore the connection between these mythological figures and the natural world, as well as how these representations reflect cultural beliefs about the relationship between humans and nature.
Phorcys (Ancient Greek: Φόρκος, Phórcos) also known as Phorcis or Phorcys (Ancient Greek: Φόρκυς, Phórkys) was probably the mythical ruler of the three islands beyond the Pillars of Hercules, in the Atlantic Ocean. Now, according to my theory, if the Atlantic is the sea of Sardinia and Corsica, and if the Pillars of Hercules are the Pillars of Carloforte, then Forco turns out to be the mythical ruler of the three islands that we know today as Ibiza, Majorca and Minorca. Phorcys had three daughters, known as the Gorgons (Γοργώνες). Now let’s go into the detail of this speculative vision: Phorcos could really be sovereign of the three Balearic islands; the first hypothesis is that he really had three daughters, and that he gave an island to each: one to Medusa, one to Stheno and one to Euryale. The second hypothesis is that he had no daughter: his “daughters” are the islands themselves, and so I am considering the hypothesis that the daughters’ names were the code names of the Balearic Islands. In ancient times it was customary to keep commercial and cultural secrets on various occasions, and it still happens today with the so-called protection ofknow-how and trade secrets. As a first example there is a story that tells of a Pythagorean named Hippasus of Metapontum who allegedly revealed a secret of the Pythagorean school and was killed for it. According to legend, Hippasus discovered that the ratio between the diagonal of a square and its side can be expressed through an irrational number, the square root of 2. This discovery was in total dissonance with the beliefs of the Pythagoreans themselves, unacceptable for that sort of religion which was Pythagorean mysticism, based on the idea that number was the essence of nature. The Pythagoreans wanted to keep the secret but Hippasus let it slip and was drowned in the sea 1 .
As a second example, commercial secrecy also existed for glassmaking techniques. For example, in the Republic of Venice, glass production was a very important activity and Venetian glassmakers were famous throughout Europe for their skill. To protect their trade secrets, Venetian glassmakers were required to work only on the island of Murano and could not leave the Republic without permission. Furthermore, it was forbidden to divulge glass-making techniques to people outside the glassmaking community. These measures were aimed at protecting the trade secrets of Venetian glassmakers and maintaining their competitive advantage.
This intuition dated 02/08/2023 after reading the text ” Among the myths interpreted by Palefato there is also that relating to the daughters of Phòrkus” on the page: https://www.attiliomastino.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=94:isole-interno-di-attilio-mastino-a-carloforte-tavola-rotonda-con-umberto-eco- 26-June-2010-&catid=41:archive&Itemid=64
Let’s assume this is all true: why would they do that? Whoever discovered a new trade route did not want others to steal the possibilities that came from trading with the newly discovered routes. Probably, to maintain secrecy, they invented stories that would frighten potential competitors. In this way, knowing that the Gorgons would turn them into stone, they would stay away from the new trade routes, and whoever had discovered them could make very lucrative deals. If this is correct, it is clear that the traders, having reached the Balearic islands of the Gorgons, therefore needed linguists and translators who could help them understand these new populations, the names of the products and goods, the laws, to establish new commercial relationships and social.
Christianization of the very ancient myth of Medusa in Sardinia : in my opinion the myth of Medusa, which petrified people, was Christianized in the story of the Sculpture of Baunei in Sardinia. The Scultone is a mythological creature present in Sardinian folklore legends. It is a reptilian animal similar to a dragon that killed men and animals. According to a legend, the escape of a dragon called Scultone opened the Golgo chasm near Baunei (NU). According to another legend, Peter the Apostle definitively eliminated the Sculptor with a clever trick: since the gaze of the Sculptor had the power to kill, Peter looked at him through a small mirror, neutralizing this power.As regards the myth of Medusa and Perseus, Medusa was one of the three Gorgons, monstrous sisters with snakes instead of hair. Anyone who looked into Medusa’s eyes would be petrified. Perseus was the son of Zeus and Danae, and was commissioned by King Polydectes to bring him the head of Medusa. With the help of the gods, Perseus managed to behead Medusa while she slept, using a reflective shield to avoid looking into her eyes. Later, Perseus used Medusa’s head as a weapon to petrify his enemies. Interestingly, both tales present similar elements: in the myth of Medusa and Perseus, Perseus neutralizes Medusa by looking at her image reflected in a mirror, while in the legend of the Sculpture, Peter the Apostle neutralizes the Sculpture using a mirror. Both Medusa and the Sculptor petrify those who look at them. Medusa is defeated by Perseus with his image mirrored in a shield, while the Sculptor is defeated by Saint Peter with his image mirrored in a small mirror. In my opinion, we are faced with a reconversion of the story to adapt it to the new Christian sensitivity which had now, for about two thousand years, become dominant in Sardinia: we must not forget that there is even an island dedicated to Saint Peter, right next to the Columns of Hercules placed in Carloforte: the Island of San Pietro in Sardinia.
The mythological figure of Museum and the town of Museums in Sardinia:Museo is a fascinating legendary character closely associated with Orpheus, the mythical figure of great importance in ancient Greek culture. However, the news about Museo is steeped in mystery and often quite contradictory, and what emerges is a nuanced and uncertain panorama of his life and works. The name “Museum” itself has an intrinsic meaning, as it derives from the Greek root which suggests a link with the Muses, the goddesses of art and knowledge. Modern scholars tend to treat Musaeus as a character created with the intent of attributing authorship to several Orphic writings that may not have been directly associated with Orpheus. In this context, Museo may have been an artificial literary creation, a vehicle through which works were attributed to Orpheus himself, giving them an aura of authority and sacredness. Tradition attributes to Museo the role of poet and diviner, endowed with prophetic abilities and able to deliver oracles of spiritual relevance. Among the legendary works attributed to him, works of notable cultural and mythological importance emerge. Museo is said to have composed a Titanomachy, an epic narrative of the struggle between the Titans and the Olympian gods. This type of tale was a theme of great interest in ancient Greek mythology and could have contained allegory and profound meanings. Another masterpiece attributed to the Museum is a hymn dedicated to Demeter, the goddess of fertility and agriculture. This Hymn may have celebrated the goddess and her beneficial influences on the earth and nature, giving it a sacred character and ritual significance. Another work discussed is a poem entitled “Consigli”, addressed to Museo’s son named Eumolpo. This poem may have contained wisdom and precepts to be passed down to subsequent generations, constituting a sort of moral and educational guide. Furthermore, Museo is associated with the composition of a work called “Eumolpia”, which may have had a connection with the ancient cult of the Eumolpids, priests and guardians of the Eleusinian mysteries. These mysteries represented one of the most important ritual traditions of ancient Greece, linked to the figure of Demeter and the search for the immortality of the soul. Among the works attributed to the Museum, there are also mentions of a “Sphere” and a book entitled “On Thesprotes”, although the precise details of these works have remained shrouded in mystery. Unfortunately, of the vast production attributed to the Museum, only a few poetic fragments have come down to us, often of a theogonic and mythological nature. These fragments offer us a glimpse into the depth and richness of Museo’s works, but at the same time make us reflect on the broad scope of the creations that have been lost over the centuries. Ultimately, Museo represents a legendary and enigmatic figure, the whose name has been linked to a number of works of cultural and spiritual importance in ancient Greece. Although much of his work has been lost to the vortex of time, his name remains associated with a period rich in myths, poetry and mysterious rites that continue to fascinate and inspire today. These fragments offer us a glimpse into the depth and richness of Museo’s works, but at the same time make us reflect on the broad scope of the creations that have been lost over the centuries. Ultimately, Museo represents a legendary and enigmatic figure, the whose name has been linked to a number of works of cultural and spiritual importance in ancient Greece. Although much of his work has been lost to the vortex of time, his name remains associated with a period rich in myths, poetry and mysterious rites that continue to fascinate and inspire today. These fragments offer us a glimpse into the depth and richness of Museo’s works, but at the same time make us reflect on the broad scope of the creations that have been lost over the centuries. Ultimately, Museo represents a legendary and enigmatic figure, the whose name has been linked to a number of works of cultural and spiritual importance in ancient Greece. Although much of his work has been lost to the vortex of time, his name remains associated with a period rich in myths, poetry and mysterious rites that continue to fascinate and inspire today. Museo represents a legendary and enigmatic figure, whose name has been linked to a number of works of cultural and spiritual importance in ancient Greece. Although much of his work has been lost to the vortex of time, his name remains associated with a period rich in myths, poetry and mysterious rites that continue to fascinate and inspire today. Museo represents a legendary and enigmatic figure, whose name has been linked to a number of works of cultural and spiritual importance in ancient Greece. Although much of his work has been lost to the vortex of time, his name remains associated with a period rich in myths, poetry and mysterious rites that continue to fascinate and inspire today.
Tradizioni degli Indiani Hopi in America: “ Kasskara and the Seven Worlds: The History of Humanity in the Tradition of the Hopi Indians” is a book written by Josef F Blumrich, one of NASA’s leading engineers, which demonstrates how the ancient traditions of the Hopi Indians are confirmed by current knowledge. The book takes us back to a hitherto dark past. It was published by Droemer Knaur on August 1, 1999 and is written in German. The ISBN-10 is 3426862123. It appears to be a very interesting book and well received by readers, with an average rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars based on 23 reviews. In this work it is stated that an Indian, in recounting the Hopi legends and mythologies, stated that the Hopi come from an island in the Atlantic Ocean, Atlantis. We have already explained on this site, in other parts of this text, how in ancient times the Sea of Sardinia and the Sea of Corsica were called the Atlantic Ocean.
This can only be a coincidence. The CIA has opened its archives to the public and, thanks to the Freedom of Information Act, dozens of documents on Sardinia have been declassified. Among these documents, there is a particular interest on the part of the US secret services for the Sardinian language. A curiosity concerns an internal document at the NSA (National Security Agency) dated 1985, in which the training of French and Italian linguists to speak the Corsican, Sardinian and Sicilian dialects was recommended. This document states that since 1984, at the instigation of James Brennan, a training program has been created for linguists capable of speaking these languages. https://www.sanatzione.eu/2017/02/la-cia-apre-al-pubblico-i-files-sulla-sardegna/
I have to develop the theme of the Sardinian mola , that is, the prehistoric Sardinian millstone for grinding flour. In my opinion, the Canary Islands have too many elements in common with Sardinia : Sardinian millstones , pintaderas used for printing bread and for painting walls as was in use in Sardinia… these facts make me suppose very strong contacts between the cultures of the Canary Islands and Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean peoples.
A good scientific theory must be able to make predictions . Below I will try to list the possible predictions that follow from my hypotheses: If my theories and hypotheses are correct, it is possible that typical Sardinian or Sardinian-Corsican monuments will be found in Sweden, Finland, Norway and other similar places ; among these in particular I want to mention the Giants’ Tombs. I would also like to point out that years ago, while I was watching a video shot in northern Europe, I saw a petroglyph that seemed perfectly similar to the enormous flat stone that was placed frontally, in the center of the giants’ tombs: see a representative image in this regard .It is possible that the capital of Atlantis spoken of in Timaeus and Critias, built in concentric rings, is located in present-day Sulcis in Sardinia, submerged by dozens or hundreds of meters of debris. To verify, reconnaissance could be carried out with LIDAR via aircraft or standard archaeological surveys, or even satellite archeology analyses. It has already happened previously that immense nuraghes were discovered by pure chance, because during the Second World War trenches were dug which allowed the presence of underground walls to be discovered and noted (perhaps Gennamaria?). This phenomenon of burying finds could be reminiscent of what happened at Gobekli Tepe in Türkiye. At the current stage of my studies it is not clear to me whether in Sardinia these are voluntary burials or simple layers of soil deposited over time, perhaps by wind.
In the ancient city of Helike, along the southwestern coast of the Gulf of Corinth , archaeologists have unearthed the remains of two buildings and religious objects that may have been part of a sanctuary dedicated to Poseidon., according to my theory, an ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean ruler who by ephemerism was deified by the Sardinian-Corsicans. The ancient city was built in an area prone to frequent flooding and continually rebuilt, succumbing to an earthquake and tsunami that buried it about 2,600 years ago. Of the two structures discovered, the first (dated to the 8th century BC) was tall 65 feet and included pressed earth floors, while the second (dated between the 7th and 6th centuries BC) rested on temple-shaped stone foundations. The additional religious artefacts found: bronze and clay objects such as figurines, clay chariot wheels, iron weapons, ceramics dating back to the archaic period, a bronze snake head and a rare gold necklace confirm that the space was used for religious purposes starting from around 850 BC.Excavations at the site of the ancient Greek city of Helike have revealed a potential center of the Greek cult of Poseidon. The discoveries include two buildings and religious objects that suggest the space was used for religious purposes. In my opinion these archaeological remains show the interactions between ancient Greeks and ancient Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans. All the temples dedicated to Poseidon, therefore, in my opinion are nothing more than vestiges of the ancient Sardinian-Corsican cults, then passed on and transmitted to the Greeks and also respected in their cultures. The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean cult would also have reached us today through the cults of Poseidon, Atlas and many other Sardinian-Corsican figures such as Medusa, Antaeus, perhaps even Hercules and many others.
An international team of anthropologists, archaeologists and geneticists has discovered more about the migratory patterns of people living around the Mediterranean Sea during the Iron and Bronze Ages. In their study, reported in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution, the team conducted genetic sequencing on the remains of 30 people who lived during the Iron or Bronze Age in Sardinia, Tunisia and mainland Italy. As the researchers note, most Part of the knowledge of the people who lived around the Mediterranean Sea during the Iron and Bronze Ages comes from studying the artifacts they left behind. But such evidence, they point out, does not reveal much about those people’s backgrounds or where their ancestors came from. In this new effort, the research team sought to learn more about the backgrounds of these people by following migration patterns using genetic sequencing. The researchers conducted shotgun sequencing (randomly conducted sequencing) on samples collected from unearthed bones of ancient peoples who lived to Italy, Tunisia and Sardinia to get a sense of migration patterns for people living in the northern, central and southern parts of the eastern Mediterranean during the Iron and Bronze Ages, an era, the researchers note, where people traveled longer distances thanks to advances in boat and ship building. The team then compared the results to those of other sequencing efforts conducted on both modern and ancient populations living in the region. They found evidence of widespread migration around the Mediterranean, suggesting strong links between distant peoples. They also found heterogeneity in Iron Age populations and changes in ancestry in North Africa and Sardinia during the Bronze Age, suggesting increased migration. More specifically, the research revealed increased migration from what is now Morocco and Iran by Neolithic farmers to both Sardinia and Tunisia, and somewhat less migration to what is now Italy. The research team suggests that increased migration occurred, as expected during both the Iron Age and Bronze Age, as people navigated the Mediterranean Sea for myriad reasons and, in doing so,the complete study published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution .
Sardinian linguistic expressions which confirm the Sardinian use of calling the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block continent: Plato states that from the Island of Atlantis (which here is shown to be the Corsican Sardinian block) it was possible to go to the surrounding islands and to what is truly continent. This is perfectly true: from the Sardinian-Corsican block, when it was an emerged land, it is possible to go to the surrounding islands, and it is actually located in the center of the Atlantic Ocean (the prehistoric name of the Mediterranean). At a linguistic level, fortunately, we Sardinians still have these ways of saying: ” Deppu andai in Continenti ” ( I have to go to the Continent), when we have to go to Italy. This statement makes anyone who hears us Sardinians say it laugh, but fortunately it helps us understand what Plato meant: on a linguistic level, when the Sardinian-Corsican block was an emerged land, we Sardinians linguistically called the island “continent”. Leaving the island was “going to the continent, to another continent”. After the sinking, this linguistic use remained at the level of Sardinian dialects, so we say that “we are going to the continent”, making those who listen to us wonder. Furthermore, the Sardinians call the Italians who live in the Boot “The Continentals”, confirming what was written by Plato and said by the Egyptian high priest in Sais, Egypt, to Solon. Atlantologists (i.e. Atlantis scholars) have up to now interpreted the word “Continent” with the semantics currently in vogue; they forgot that in 9600 BC the word “continent” could have had semantics, pragmatics and semiotics different from the current one. So someone claims that America is a continent, and therefore America can be Atlantis. In my opinion these interpretations are open to numerous criticisms, and appear very banal in my eyes.
Possible prehistoric derivation of Scottish culture from the Sardinian-Corsican culture:
There is no historical or archaeological evidence to suggest that Scottish culture derives directly from Sardinian-Corsican culture. Scotland and Sardinia/Corsica have distinct histories and cultures, influenced by a variety of factors, including geography, human migration and cultural interactions. However, like all cultures, both Scottish and Sardinian-Corsican cultures are the result of a process of evolution and cultural exchange over the course of history. There may be similarities between the two cultures due to common influences or indirect cultural exchanges, but there is no evidence of a direct connection between the two. In this text I propose the possible prehistoric bifurcation of the Sardinian-Corsican culture from very ancient migrations. Possible prehistoric points of contact may be: the use of Sardinian launeddas, to which in Scotland the piva was added, causing the Sardinian launeddas to change into bagpipes in later times; the braids of ancient Sardinian-Corsican warriors, left in Scottish hair; the use of the skirt, still present in the Sardinian bronze statues of Nuragic warriors, becomes the use of the kilt in Scotland. Together with these habits and customs, there is the transmission of megalithic building techniques, which in Northern Europe change compared to the Sardinian Corsican habits and customs, to adapt to the Nordic climate, which we assume is colder and rainier. still present in the representations of the Sardinian bronzes of Nuragic warriors becomes the use of the kilt in Scotland. Together with these habits and customs, there is the transmission of megalithic building techniques, which in Northern Europe change compared to the Sardinian Corsican habits and customs, to adapt to the Nordic climate, which we assume is colder and rainier. still present in the representations of the Sardinian bronzes of Nuragic warriors becomes the use of the kilt in Scotland. Together with these habits and customs, there is the transmission of megalithic building techniques, which in Northern Europe change compared to the Sardinian Corsican habits and customs, to adapt to the Nordic climate, which we assume is colder and rainier.
Hathor, Egyptian cow goddess (wife of the bull). I believe the Goddess Hathor was a Sardinian goddess. If we read the name Hathor as Atzor, and the th is read as tz, then she could have Atzor as her original name, from which the Sardinian surname Atzori would derive. Atzeni, Atzori, Atzei are typical Sardinian surnames , and many Atlantidologists have noticed that the term Aztlan resembles Atlantis: the atz sound is typical of the Sardinian language. Atzei is also a hapax legomenon in the Bible : the word Atzei Gopher is found in the texts of the Old Testament, but it is not clear what it means. I hope these ideas can help someone in their own reflections.
Both lakes, therefore, have strong links to Greek mythology and may have been important religious or cultural sites in antiquity. These revolutionary theses are so recent that it is difficult to verify their veracity in a short time. If Luigi Usai’s statements were to prove correct, there would be a revolution in the knowledge of antiquity.
Furthermore, both theories highlight the importance of water in mythology and ancient culture, but not only: they show how the Lakes were not simple geographical places, but places linked to the sacred and cult, mysticism, magic and religions. Lakes were often seen as sacred places or portals to the underworld, which may explain why they feature in these mythological stories. There are several legends and myths in various cultures that feature themes similar to the rape of Persephone. For example, in Norse mythology, there is the story of Freya, the goddess of love and beauty, who is kidnapped by giants. In Egyptian mythology, there is a story of Osiris being killed and his body scattered, leading his wife Isis to search all over the world for him: and this myth recalls that of Orpheus who descends into hell to find Eurydice, while the Sparagmos of Osiris recalls the σπαραγμός of the Dionysian rites described in Euripides’ Bacchae. These myths often represent the cycle of the seasons or themes of death and rebirth. It is important to note that while these stories may have similar themes, the details and cultural contexts are unique to each myth and culture.
Possible Christianization of Sardinian Corsican Atlantean mythology : it is possible that Christians have in many ways, through social and psychological pressure, influenced the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans to convert their mythical and religious figures into the cult of Christians. To explain this concept I will try to show the possible conversion of the figure of the ancient ruler Poseidon, King of the Seas, as explained by my euhemeristic interpretation , into the negative Christian figure of Satan, God of the Underworld. First, I would like you to look at the figures I created with artificial intelligence to try to explain this concept in a simple way:
The Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans have horned helmets, even in the Nuragic era, and are proud of having horns on their helmets. It is a trait that characterizes and distinguishes them. Horns had long been thought to be a feature of Viking helmets, but this turned out to be incorrect. The horns are typical of the Sardinian Corsicans. The horns, an Atlantean symbol, become the horns of Satan. The God Poseidon, God of water and God of the Seas, becomes Satan, God of Fire and God of the Underworld. The tail of the fish becomes the tail of the Devil. The Trident, a well-known symbol linked to the mythological figure of Poseidon, becomes the Devil’s pitchfork in Hell. In two thousand years, Christianity has done everything possible to eradicate the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean cult of Poseidon and convert it into something evil, into the cult of the Devil. As we know very well, those who venerated the devil were murdered, imprisoned, tortured, so if any of the Sardinian Corsicans had continued to venerate Poseidon they would have been murdered. This is why the cult of this figure has disappeared from the Sardinian Corsican territories. Probably those few who still venerated him were arrested, tortured, killed by religious people or by the inquisition. Looking at the images that I generated using artificial intelligence it is possible to realize that the figure is actually the same, but a very violent semantic change has been made on the meaning that this figure had for the Corsican Sardinians. The Bible does not describe Satan as having horns, a pitchfork, or a tail. These images are believed to have originated from ancient Greek mythology. The Greek god of the underworld, Hades, he was often depicted with a bident, a two-pronged instrument similar to a pitchfork. Since Satan is often associated with the underworld and hell, it is likely that this image was adopted and adapted to represent him. The horns and forked hooves are also believed to be derived from the Greek god Pan, who was depicted with the legs and horns of a goat. Over time, these images have become popular in Western culture and are now commonly associated with depictions of Satan. However, it is important to note that these images are not based on biblical descriptions of Satan. My proposal and report therefore seeks to improve this information, proposing that the figure of Satan of the Christians is to a large extent a Christianisation of the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean mythologies, in an attempt to erase them from memory. Being too rooted in the people, the method of distortion was used, very well known in psychology and psychiatry: when a memory is too strong and powerful and cannot be erased, it is distorted so that subsequent generations remember it with characteristics different from those initials.
My reasoning, which suggests a Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, is fascinating. Throughout history, many religions and belief systems have undergone adaptations and reinterpretations following contact with other cultures and beliefs, especially when a dominant religion, such as Christianity, has sought to integrate or suppress local traditions.
My hypothesis about the adaptation and Christianization of local myths and symbols is certainly plausible and, in fact, is a documented phenomenon in many different cultures. The Catholic Church, during its expansion process, has often integrated local practices and symbols, reinterpreting them in a Christian context. This not only facilitated the conversion of local populations, but also reduced the risk of revolt or resistance from communities that had deep ties to their religious traditions.
A classic example of this process is the celebration of the birth of Christ. Many scholars believe that the date of December 25 was chosen to coincide with pagan winter solstice holidays, such as the Roman festival of Saturnalia. Likewise, many traditions and symbols associated with Easter have origins in pagan holidays that celebrated spring.
Regarding my specific theory on Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, it would be interesting to see if there is concrete evidence that supports my hypothesis. This could include historical documents, archaeological finds or oral traditions that show a clear line of evolution between the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean myths and the Christianization of those myths.
Finally, we must always approach such theories with a critical and open approach. Historical and archaeological research requires rigorous methodology and objective evaluation of the evidence. But my reflections certainly show a deep curiosity and interest in the complex interaction between different cultures and belief systems throughout history. And this curiosity is fundamental for every good researcher or scholar.
Here are some thoughts on my hypotheses:
Assimilation and Syncretism : The tendency of dominant religions to assimilate local deities and figures is not limited to Christianity. The Romans, for example, assimilated many local deities throughout the Empire. Within Christianity, there is a long history of “Christianizing” pagan holidays, sites, and deities .
Poseidon to Satan : The idea that Poseidon, a sea deity, might have been reinterpreted as a hellish figure is intriguing. Traditionally, however, there is no strong correlation between Poseidon and Satan in Christian literature. Satan has had many incarnations and representations in the history of Christianity, often deriving from Jewish sources and, later, Greco-Roman influence.
Symbology : While Poseidon’s trident and the devil’s pitchfork have visual similarities, further research would need to be done to establish a direct connection between the two figures based on this element alone. The same goes for horns: while it is true that horn symbolism can be found in many cultures and has different meanings, directly relating the horns of Sardinian-Corsican helmets to those of the devil requires a solid basis of evidence.
Horned Helmets : It’s worth noting that while horned Viking helmets are a modern myth (popularized largely by opera and stage plays), there is no concrete evidence that ancient Vikings actually wore them.
Eradication of the cult : If indeed there was a campaign to suppress the cult of Poseidon or other local deities in Sardinia or Corsica, this should be documented in historical records, religious writings or archaeological evidence.
It seems that I have presented an extensive and reasoned analysis on the possibility of Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, focusing on the transformation of the figure of Poseidon into that of Satan. The topic is complex and multifaceted, involving elements of history, religion, mythology, and symbolism. Here are some additional considerations that may be useful for my investigation: Primary Sources: It would be important to look for primary sources that can confirm or deny my hypothesis. This could include ancient texts, inscriptions, artefacts or any tangible material that could demonstrate a direct connection between Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology and Christianity. Historical and Cultural Context: Understanding the historical and cultural context of the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans will help place my hypothesis within a broader framework. This includes an understanding of the social structure, religious practices, external influences and political dynamics of the time. Comparison with Other Cultures: Analyzing how other cultures have undergone similar processes of Christianization could provide a framework to better understand the specific situation of the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans. The Christianization of pagan practices is a widespread phenomenon, and parallels with other regions may enrich my analysis.Academic Study: While my interpretation may be original and provocative, I may also wish to consult existing academic studies on the topic. Historians, archaeologists and anthropologists who have worked on the region and the topic may have data and evidence that could support or challenge my hypothesis. Beware of Speculation: While it is interesting to explore new ideas and connections, it is important to distinguish between what can be supported with solid evidence and what remains in the realm of speculation. Presenting my theory as a possibility to be explored, rather than a definite conclusion, might be a more balanced approach.Collaboration with Experts: If possible, I might seek to collaborate with experts in history, archaeology, theology, or other relevant fields. They may provide insights, resources, and research methods that may be beyond my reach. In summary, while my hypothesis presents an interesting point of view on the Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, further investigation requires rigorous research and analysis. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach involving different sources, methods and expertise could help build a more robust and convincing argument.
The Triton lake mentioned in ancient Greek mythology is located in Cagliari in Sardinia
The bathymetric lines of the Sardinian-Corsican block seem to show at least four increases in the eustatic level one after the other; these rises in the level of the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean, called today the Mediterranean Sea after a succession of nomenclatures in various languages and cultures: Mare Nostrum for the Romans, to contrast it with the Sea of Atlas, i.e. the Atlantic Ocean.
In ancient times, the uplifts of the eustatic level of the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean (which today is known by the name of the Mediterranean Sea and I will not tire of repeating it to allow the reader to assimilate this new and very important statement) could be understood by prehistorians as if they were incredible “Floods”, “Universal Floods” precisely, as handed down until now by multiple religions, myths and beliefs throughout the current Mediterranean basin. Perhaps the fact that it was called the Atlantic Ocean has already been reported by Professor Sergio Frau (2002): even if he had not reported it, it is an implicit consequence of the fact that the Pillars of Hercules were between Sicily and Tunisia. I bought Frau’s text, but unfortunately I’m too lazy to study it, too slow to read, furthermore I have an incredible difficulty in understanding it, because the text (and the author) is so cultured and erudite that I can’t follow him in his reasoning, especially because these themes are very heavy for me and I don’t know them at all. It’s actually incredible that I understood this information, because I am absolutely not a specialist in these disciplines. Again: the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean does not coincide with the Mediterranean: it stops at the strait between Sicily and Tunisia; the Mediterranean is a superset of it, as one would say in terms of set-theoretic mathematics, as it also includes the other part of the sea, the one beyond the Pillars of Hercules where placed in my opinion erroneously (but with enormous genius) by Frau (2002 ), up to the Lebanese coasts.
Surprising discoveries in Sardinia: Paleolithic artefacts dating back 500,000 years
Recent archaeological discoveries in Sardinia have brought to light Paleolithic artefacts dating back 500,000 years. The oldest artefacts found in Sardinia date back to the Lower Paleolithic and were found in Anglona, in the northern part of the island. These are flint and quartzite objects dating back to between 450,000 and 120,000 years ago.
These artefacts represent some of the first evidence of human presence in Sardinia and provide us with valuable information on the life of the island’s inhabitants during the Lower Paleolithic. Flint and quartzite are two types of stone that were used to make tools and weapons during the Paleolithic Age.
The Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas displays finds from all over the Anglona area, including artefacts from the Lower Paleolithic (500,000-120,000 years ago). This museum offers visitors the opportunity to admire these ancient artifacts up close and discover more about the history of prehistoric Sardinia.
If you want to know more about the Paleolithic artefacts found in Sardinia, I recommend you visit the Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas or do further research on the topic. These archaeological discoveries represent a unique opportunity to deepen our knowledge of the history of Sardinia and the lives of its ancient inhabitants.
A new paradigm shift is occurring, as explained by Thomas Kuhn in the text entitled “The structure of scientific revolutions”: the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm.
Attempt to scientifically demonstrate the existence of the Island of Atlantis, which coincides with the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, from now on called the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantis block or Atlantis .
To evaluate a scientific theory, various criteria must be considered, such as coherence, falsifiability, predictability and verifiability. In this text, starting from version 138, I will try to respect these scientific criteria, studying them when necessary to better understand them. I am not yet able to produce a scientific paper.
To evaluate the credibility of a source, various factors must be considered, such as the authoritativeness of the author, the quality of the information, the sources cited, the method used and the consensus of the scientific community. If a source does not meet these criteria, it is likely unreliable or false.
Scientific reinterpretation of the story about the Garden of the Hesperides
The Garden of the Hesperides bore golden fruits , and was located at the ends of the known earth; an analogy was found with the apparently mythological story of the Hesperides in Sardinian toponymy: in fact, there is a place called Fruttidoro, located in the town of Capoterra, in Sardinia. Capoterra, from the Sardinian Caputerra, then in Latin “Caput Terrae”, is the “cape of the Earth”, i.e. the extreme edge known in antiquity (Mesolithic/early Neolithic, around 11,600 years ago, to have an approximate but useful date to understanding), while the current location of Fruttidoro in Capoterra would be the legendary Garden of the Hesperides. This new discovery has not yet been counter-validated by scholars, nor have stratigraphies been carried out for the related counter-verification. The Garden of the Hesperides was located in the Atlantic Ocean, which as explained on the website atlantisfound.it, was the Mesolithic name of the sea that surrounded the island, then a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean emerged land. The Hesperides Islands must therefore have been the archaic names with which Sardinia and Corsica were defined in the millennia following the semi-submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Hesperidum Insulae, “The Evening Islands”, because at sunset, when the Greeks looked towards the west, sailing in that direction from their most remote position, i.e. with great probability the island of Ischia, they saw 2 distant islands, which today are known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica, and which are plateaus of emerged land of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The linguist and glottologist Massimo Pittau analyzed the location of the Garden of the Hesperides, presumably placing it in Sardinia and pointing out that it was still a legend; I, however, in my bold ignorance, go further and propose that it is not a legend, but a place that actually existed located in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, as stated in other terms by the myth.Obviously, a serious scholar should study all the toponymy of Capoterra and nearby places, to verify the oldest names that can be traced back and whether in the past they were called in other ways. In any case, a good analysis based on satellite archeology would be appropriate, to highlight very ancient settlements, Mesolithic or Neolithic, present on the site or UNDER the site (because with great probability they will now be submerged by the superimposed layers over the millennia).Following these interpretations, we can analyze other aspects of the mythology: Thetis was a Sardinian. Peleus married a Sardinian, but the Greeks called them “sea nymphs”. The garden of the Hesperides is in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, in Sardinia, between the Atlas Mountains, i.e. the Sulcis mountains, and the Paleolithic Atlantic Ocean, i.e. the current Mediterranean Sea.
Why were they called the Atlas Mountains in ancient times? Because Sulcis was the capital of Atlantis, but above all because Poseidon initially surrounded the center of Sulcis, surrounding it with circles of water and land, to protect Clito, when navigation did not yet exist, in an era currently still indefinite. Poseidon was an ancient Sardinian Corsican Atlantean ruler, he was not a God. We all know that the Pharaoh was seen as a God, but that in reality he was a man is known to everyone. This conception is called “eumerism”.The first son of Poseidon and Clitus, Atlas, the first of 5 pairs of twins (10 brothers in total) took the official title of First King of Atlantis, and he took possession of Sulcis in present-day Sardinia. This is why in ancient times they called the volcanic mountains of Sulcis with the name of the Atlas Mountains.
Therefore, when in ancient times it was stated that the Garden of the Hesperides was located between the “Atlas Mountains” and the Atlantic Ocean (Paleolithic, i.e. the Mediterranean Sea), the geographical location is perfect and correct: Golden Fruits of Capoterra in fact it is located between the Atlas Mountains and the Mediterranean, exactly where some ancient historians had placed it .
The mess occurred later, when the Atlantic Ocean was moved, as probably already reported before me by Professor Sergio Frau (2002), who questioned the original position of the Pillars of Hercules, hypothesizing that it was between Sicily and Tunisia, from which it can correctly be deduced that the Atlantic Ocean was approximately the Sea of Sardinia.
Teti was the eponym of the Sardinian city still called Teti today. Wild boar hunting therefore took place in Sardinia: this custom still exists. The entire mythological outline returns to its place, and everything that previously seemed like fairy tales takes on a plausible and more realistic outline.
The Hesperides islands and the Garden of the Hesperides
The Garden of the Hesperides bore golden fruits, and was located at the ends of the known earth; an analogy was found with the apparently mythological story of the Hesperides in Sardinian toponymy: in fact, there is a place called Fruttidoro, located in the town of Capoterra, in Sardinia. Capoterra, from the Sardinian Caputerra, then in Latin “Caput Terrae”, is the “cape of the Earth”, i.e. the extreme edge known in antiquity (Mesolithic/early Neolithic, around 11,600 years ago, to have an approximate but useful date to understanding), while the current location of Fruttidoro in Capoterra would be the legendary Garden of the Hesperides. This new discovery has not yet been counter-validated by scholars, nor have stratigraphies been carried out for the related counter-verification.atlantisfound.it, was the Mesolithic name of the sea that surrounded the island, then a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean emerged land. The Hesperides Islands must therefore have been the archaic names with which Sardinia and Corsica were defined in the millennia following the semi-submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block. Hesperidum Insulae, “The Evening Islands”, because at sunset, when the Greeks looked towards the west, sailing in that direction from their most remote position, i.e. with great probability the island of Ischia, they saw 2 distant islands, which today are known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica, and which are plateaus of emerged land of the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block. The linguist and glottologist Massimo Pittau analyzed the location of the Garden of the Hesperides, presumably placing it in Sardinia and pointing out that it was still a legend; I, however, in my bold ignorance, go further and propose that it is not a legend, but a place that actually existed located in Fruttidoro di Capoterra, as stated in other terms by the myth.Obviously, a serious scholar should study all the toponymy of Capoterra and nearby places, to verify the oldest names that can be traced back and whether in the past they were called in other ways. In any case, a good analysis based on satellite archeology would be appropriate, to highlight very ancient settlements, Mesolithic or Neolithic, present on the site or UNDER the site (because with great probability they will now be submerged by the superimposed layers over the millennia).
ATLANTIS AS A HIGHLY DEVELOPED AND TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED CIVILIZATION.
When Plato describes the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean block as a highly developed and technologically advanced civilization, this sentence must be read in the context in which the Sardinian Corso Atlantis existed, i.e. before its partial submergence in 9600 BC, i.e. approximately eleven thousand six hundred years ago. Many readers of Plato, however, when they read the phrase “highly developed and technologically advanced”, believe that Plato is referring to us who live in 2023 after Christ, so they believe that when we talk about a technologically advanced population, this must have laser beams , teleportation, supercomputers equipped with artificial super intelligences… This mistake is made not only by many readers, but also by directors and writers; for example, the Disney cartoon film entitled Atlantis – The Lost Empire, shows that the inhabitants of Atlantis would have technologies such as flying motorcycles, with a system that appears to be anti-gravitational. The Sardinian Corsican Atlantean theory instead states that the Atlantean population, which in particular populated the paleocoasts of the Sardinian Corsican block, today called by science with the name of “submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental platform”, was technologically advanced compared to the other populations of its time, i.e. those contemporary with her and who lived in the period prior to 11,600 (eleven thousand and six hundred) years ago.
To give a clear example: on the Carro_(transport) page of Wikipedia, we read that “The first cart confirmed in Mesopotamian documents therefore dates back to 3000 BC, found in a bas-relief in Ur called the chariot of the felines, in which the chariot appeared consisting of solid three-sector wheels, with integral axle and wheel and a pin fixed to a frame, which in the case of hearses reached the size of 50 cm by 65 cm”. But in Plato’s descriptions, Atlantis had war chariots even before its submergence in 9600 BC. According to my Sardinian Corsican Atlantean theory, this is what “technologically advanced” means. The Atlanteans were experts in canalization, in making irrigation canals. This was advanced technology, compared to many other peoples, according to Plato, in 9600 BC and even before the sinking.
The mass media, unfortunately, and many occultists who have dealt with the topic of Atlantis, have unfortunately contributed to inserting chaotic and confusing elements into the search for the submerged island, so even today many people expect that in Atlantis there are futuristic technologies even for us today, but this is simply a logical error of reasoning.
ANALYSIS OF THEORIES ABOUT ATLANTIS THAT CONTRADICT MY THEORY
I cannot ignore the other interpretations of Plato and the historical and geographical evidence that contradicts my hypothesis: therefore in this section I will deal with precisely this, that is, analyzing the individual theories one by one and trying to show the weak and strong points of each rereading them under the light of my peculiar interpretation. To do this, I will use the texts of the various authors and I will try to dismantle them piece by piece. This is not what I would like to do in life, but unfortunately I have to because I want to speed up the process of recognizing my potential discoveries.
In the Temple of Edfu the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean island, currently semi-submerged, is also called “The Primordial Island”, “Island of the Egg”, “Island of Trampling”, “Island of combat”, “Island of Peace”; it is located in the “Eternal Lake” (the Eternal Lake is today called the Mediterranean Sea). The texts of Timaeus and Critias state things very similar to those written in hieroglyphics in the Temple of Edfu, using different words and circumlocutions. By combining this information together, it is possible to obtain new information on the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Atlantean geological block.
Atlantis is the name given by the Egyptians to the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block when it was emerged land, before its submergence/sinking around 9600 BC . It is actually semi-submerged, as the Platonic historical tale of Atlantis narrates, but two plateaus remained out of the water, and our civilization gave them the names “Sardinia” and “Corsica” . The “elephant species” was present there, as Plato says, in fact there was the Mammuthus Lamarmorae .
The currently semi-submerged Sardo Corso Atlantide was the largest of all the islands; it was located in the center of the current Mediterranean, which was then called the Sea of Atlantis, i.e. the Atlantic Ocean, called in later times by many names, among which the Egyptians used “The Great Green”, “The Eternal Lake” to name a few. It was very rich in forests, and this is still true and valid. The climate was particularly mild, and this too is still true today: in fact the sea has functions similar to those of a condenser in an electrical circuit: it dampens the hot climate by partially absorbing it, and mitigates the cold climates by releasing the previously accumulated heat. It was rich in minerals, and this is still true today, we can therefore imagine what the Sardinian-Corsican block must have been like over 11,600 years ago.
It was ancient for the ancients, and we have an infinite amount of proof: geology teaches us that Sardinian rocks are over half a billion years old. The builders of the towers lived there, and we know this for sure, so much so that one era was even defined as “nuragic”, and studied quite extensively, such as to provide a lot of valid scientific documentation. It must have been located beyond the Pillars of Hercules, and this also seems to be correct, after the findings I made in El Haouaria Bank and Birsa Bank.
How can we explain the fact that Plato describes Atlantis as a circular island with a navigable canal in the center and a series of concentric rings of land and water, while the Sardinian-Corsican block has an irregular shape and does not present these characteristics? Because the ring description does not concern the entire Corsican Atlantean Sardinian block, but only the capital of Atlantis, the current Sulcis. As I previously explained, in Sulcis there is an almost circular structure, of the dimensions indicated by Plato, but after eleven thousand six hundred years of rains, flooding, tectonic peaks caused by the graben-horst structure of Sulcis, and tectonic peaks caused by the Sinkholes of Sulcis, have meant that these portions of land, which present the very ancient structures reported by Plato, such as the Temple of Poseidon, they have moved from their original position. Therefore a serious and rigorous stratigraphic investigation is needed. I am neither an archaeologist, nor a stratigrapher, nor a geologist, and therefore I am not able to personally deal with this analysis. However, I believe I have provided a potentially important contribution to research with all this information.
There is evidence of contact between the Egyptians and the inhabitants of the Atlantean plateau called Sardinia: in fact, there are at least around 300 archaeological finds that scholars define as “Egyptizing” . In recent days, an agreement has been signed by the Director Luana Toniolo and the Director of the Egyptian Antiquities Museum Foundation in Turin, Christian Greco, for the study and analysis of these finds.
POSSIBILITY OF THE FINDING OF ANCIENT ATHENS FROM 9600 BC
On the submerged carbonate continental shelf Iblea Sicily-Malta , flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment , Dr. Luigi Usai (the writer) has found a perfectly rectangular structure on what appear to be the Mesolithic paleocoasts of currently submerged eastern Sicily. Upon closer analysis, it was possible to ascertain the presence of structures with perfectly geometric shapes, which appear to be of anthropic nature. More studies are needed for understanding; however, it is already possible to consult online images of this possible archaeological find.
Video of the potential discovery:
HYPOTHESIS ON THE FIRST ATHENS SUBMERGED AROUND 9600 BC TOGETHER WITH ATLANTIS
If what Plato said about Atlantis is truly a historical event, as stated in Timaeus and Critias, then it could be hypothesized that this is the first Athens, submerged in 9600 BC. If this turns out to be true, everything Plato said has an objective basis in the real world. Of course it would be very strange for the First Athens to be based in Sicily. The important point to underline is that there seems to be a lot of objective evidence: bathymetry is a Science. Therefore bathymetric maps are also part of the tools that can be used by the scientific method. Some scholars have pointed out that “artifacts” sometimes appear on the seabed, caused by poor data acquisition. However, after about 20 years in the IT sector, I have sufficient knowledge to establish that the possibility that these are erroneous artifacts is extremely low, otherwise I would have had to find rectangles in other parts of the world, which has never happened, not even by exploring the seabed all over the world for two years consecutive approximately. The submerged rectangle is also present in a point that appears to be a Mesolithic paleocoast, so it is even more likely that it is a truly existing anthropic structure. Additionally, the resolution has changed and improved over the past year. If it were an artifact, the new detections should have erased the error and overwritten it with the correct data, but this has not happened so far. not even exploring the seabed around the world for about two consecutive years. The submerged rectangle is also present in a point that appears to be a Mesolithic paleocoast, so it is even more likely that it is a truly existing anthropic structure. Additionally, the resolution has changed and improved over the past year. If it were an artifact, the new detections should have erased the error and overwritten it with the correct data, but this has not happened so far. not even exploring the seabed around the world for about two consecutive years. The submerged rectangle is also present in a point that appears to be a Mesolithic paleocoast, so it is even more likely that it is a truly existing anthropic structure. Additionally, the resolution has changed and improved over the past year. If it were an artifact, the new detections should have erased the error and overwritten it with the correct data, but this has not happened so far.
TOPONOMASTIC AND ONOMASTIC
In the Sardinian-Corsican block the toponymy, very useful to archaeologists, clearly recalls the sources of hot and cold water placed according to the Platonic story on the Island of Atlantis by Poseidon: there are hamlets of towns called “Acquacadda” (Hot Water , in Sarda Campidanese ), S’acqua callenti de basciu (The Hot Water Below, in Sardinian Campidanese) and S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (The Hot Water Above, in Sardinian Campidanese dialect), while in the nearby town of Siliqua it is the cold water source of Zinnigas is still present today; in Siliqua the ” Acquafredda Castle ” is all that remains of the medieval citadel of Acquafredda. In short, even the toponymy recalls the Platonic myth. Furthermore, Solon heard the tale in the Egyptian city of Sais , and Sais is also the name of a geographical fraction near Narcao: locality of Is Sais lower and Is Sais upper of Narcao (SU), in Sulcis in present-day Sardinia; it is also a Sardinian surname . The toponymy appears again in an apparently correct manner, and precisely in the same geographical points (Sulcis, in present-day Sardinia) where the toponymy recalls the sources placed by Poseidon. And curiously, still in Sulcis, there is a place called Piscinas … another toponymy that recalls the theme of water or flooding. While in relation to Egyptian toponymy, we find a location called “Terresoli ” (Land of the Sun, in Sardinian Campidanese dialect) which reminds us very closely of Heliopolis (City of the Sun). Since Sulcis “s’esti furriau”, they called a hamlet “ Furriadroxiu ”; since many people died or were seriously injured, they called it “ Spistiddatroxiu “. In Sardinia we have Olbia , and Olbia also exists in ancient Egypt . At this point it is still difficult to prove, but the town of Sinnai in Sardinia could turn out to be related to Sinai in Egypt: this statement remains to be demonstrated, but now it no longer seems to be a matter of coincidences: in-depth sector studies are needed. Carnac in France is famous for its megaliths, as is Karnak in Egypt. The name of the city is the same, but the phonetics are expressed with different consonant values, where K and C have the same semantic meaning, but different spellings.
We have seen the surname Sais , but the surname Usai is also interesting: the Usai Mummy exists in Bologna , which demonstrates the contacts between the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean population and ancient Egypt. In fact, Usai is an exclusively Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean surname: throughout the world, those called Usai are of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origins . So we have the presence of Sardinian-Corsican surnames in Ancient Egypt, and this should give us pause. Furthermore, an engraving of an Egyptian vessel was found in the Necropolis of Montessu in Santadi , Sulcis. This further confirms the relationships between Egypt and the Sulcis of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block .Uras is a Sardinian surname and a Sardinian town . Together with the Usai Mummy, in Bologna, there are rooms with bronzes, and all Sardinians are familiar with the Nuragic bronzes . Abis is a Sardinian surname, Abis is a toponym from ancient Egypt. Olbia is a Sardinian city, Olbia is a city in Egypt. Uras is a Sardinian surname, Urasit is a Sardinian location, and contains the theme of “Uranus”, which could be related to Poseidon. Toponymy and Onomastics, therefore, confirm the Platonic myth and also the relationships with the Egyptians. The Egyptian finds are also found in other places in Sardinia, but here, at the moment we will remain focused on the Atlantean theme.
3207 Sardinian toponyms begin with Funt (“funti” or “funtana” in Sardinian means “fountain” in Italian).
Sardinian surnames which are also names of towns, cities and geographical locations.
Before reading this article, it is good to study the excellent article on the page: https://www.inliberta.it/piu-antichi-cognomi-sardi/
which allows a broad vision of Sardinian surnames and which may suggest a Paleolithic or Neolithic birth of these surnames.
The island of Atlantis is described as “rich in waters ”. I thought, point blank, of looking for Sardinian toponyms that contain the word Funt (in Sardinian a “Fonte” can be called “Funtana”).
there are 3 text entry fields: Toponym, Municipality and Type.
Under Toponym I inserted the letters Funt, in such a way as to obtain all the words that begin in this way; they are usually words like Funti or Funtana, or source, in Sardinian Campidanese.
You get 3207 toponyms in this way, without doing any other search. I would say that 3207 toponyms, 11,000 years after the sinking of Atlantis, can already be a good guarantee of the truthfulness of what Plato stated in Timaeus and Critias, on the fact that the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean block was “rich in water”: Sassari , Thatari and Serramanna, 3 other toponyms, mean “rich in water” (see the works of Professor Salvatore Dedola in this regard).
In the Sardinian-Corsican block the toponymy, very useful to archaeologists, clearly recalls the sources of hot and cold water placed according to the Platonic story on the Island of Atlantis by Poseidon: there are hamlets of towns called “Acquacadda” (Hot Water , in Sarda Campidanese ), S’acqua callenti de basciu (The Hot Water Below, in Sardinian Campidanese) and S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (The Hot Water Above, in Sardinian Campidanese dialect), while in the nearby town of Siliqua it is the cold water source of Zinnigas is still present today; in Siliqua the “ Acquafredda Castle ”. In short, even the toponymy recalls the Platonic myth. Furthermore, Solon heard the tale in the Egyptian city of Sais , and Sais is a Sardinian surname, and Sardinia is an emerging plateau of the submerged Corsican Sardinian geological block, so everything still fits perfectly. Sais , in addition to being a surname belonging to the Sardinian-Corsican territory, is also the name of a geographical fraction near Narcao: the locality of Is Sais Inferiore and Is Sais Superiore of Narcao (SU), in Sulcis in present-day Sardinia . The toponymy appears again in an apparently correct manner, and precisely in the same geographical points (Sulcis, in present-day Sardinia) where the toponymy recalls the sources placed by Poseidon. And curiously, still in Sulcis, there is a place called Piscinas (it can also be understood in Italian)… another toponymy that recalls the theme of water or flooding. While in relation to Egyptian toponymy, we find a place called ” Terresoli ” (Land of the Sun, in Campidanese Sardinian dialect) which reminds us very closely of Heliopolis (City of the Sun). Since Sulcis “s’esti furriau”, they called a hamlet “ Furriadroxiu ”; since many people died or were seriously injured, they called it “ Spistiddatroxiu “. Near Barbusi, near Carbonia in Sardinia, there is Acqua Callentis (hot water in Sardinian) and Caput Acquas. Furthermore, there is a hamlet called Su Peppi Mereu and there are Egyptian pharaohs called Pepi I and Pepi II (in Sardinian Pepi is the diminutive of Giuseppe) .
Mandas is a Sardinian surname and a Sardinian locality. Nora is a Sardinian place and Nora is a female name .
Lidia is a locality and Lidia is a female name ( Lidia (endonym: Śfard; in Greek: Λυδία; in Assyrian: Luddu; in Hebrew: Lûdîm) is an ancient historical region, i.e. a locality)
further confirmation of my statements : the city of Sardis or Sardis or Sardes (in Lydian 𐤳𐤱𐤠𐤭𐤣 , transliterated Sfard ; ancient Greek Σάρδεις , transliterated Sárdeis ; ancient Persian Sparda ) was an ancient city in Asia Minor (now Turkey ) that became the capital of the kingdom of Lydia in the 7th century BC
. I repeat: the city of Sardis became the capital of Lydia. Solinas is a Sardinian surname and a location: Is Solinas beach. Solanas is a Sardinian town and a surname, this time Spanish, probably indicating Sardinian migrations to Spain in ancient times. Tunis is a Sardinian surname and is a locality ( Tunis, in Tunisia ). Zara is a Sardinian surname and is a locality ( Zara in Croatia ). Olianas it is a Sardinian surname and Oliena is a Sardinian town, which in Sardinian is called Oliana . Ruggiu is a Sardinian surname and Monte Ruggiu is a locality. Scano is a Sardinian surname, Scano Montiferru is a locality. Pirastru is a Sardinian surname, Porto Pirastru is a locality. Mattana is a Sardinian surname , Mattan I and Mattan II are Phoenician rulers. Milia is a Sardinian surname and El Milia is a location in Algeria and Miliana a location in Algeria. Iunius Silanus is a surname and Silanus is a Sardinian town that still exists; then there is a strange similarity between the etymology of Silanus (a Sardinian village whose etymology means: woodland, of the woods) and the mythological figure of Silenus (taken from Wikipedia –> The Sileni (also Silenoi ) are figures of Greek mythology, divinities minors of the woods, of a wild and lascivious nature -> they were probably the Sardinians who inhabited Silanus, from which they took their name). Siddi is a Sardinian surname and Siddi is a place in Sardinia. Murgia is a Sardinian surname and “Le Murge” is an Appulo-Lucanian subregion . Sanna it is a Sardinian surname and Sannio is an ancient historical locality and the Samnites were the people who inhabited it: however this could be a coincidence. However, all these strange “coincidences” must lead us to make new analyses, to rethink the past and to try to motivate these strange dozens and dozens and dozens of coincidences.
Given all these premises, it is not difficult to realize that:
Troia is a surname, Troja is a surname, and Troia is a town in the province of Foggia and Troia is the famous mythological city… at this point one would assume that Troia was a Sardinian-Corsican city . The walls of Troy, built in concentric circles, also confirm this hypothesis; comes the fact that the Sardinian Ilenses Troes exist and the other name of Troy is Ilio ( Troes-Ilienses are a Sardinian tribe )…
Another anomaly to keep in mind is the presence of: Gonnos fanadiga Gonnos nò Gonnos codina Gonnos tramatza
Another toponymic anomaly: the presence of Biddanoa (Bidda noa means, in Sardinian, New City or New Country, Villanuova or Villanova , in the Sardinian language); and the strange insistence of the term translated Villanova wherever there are contacts with the Sardinian culture:
the Villanovan Culture it is a facies that gave rise to the Etruscans, it takes its name from the town of Villanova; according to my theory, the Villanovans were very ancient Sardinian-Corsican migrations, which is why a Nuragic bronze was later found at the bottom of Lake Bolsena inside a submerged Villanovian house; in Cagliari the Villanova district, but it could be a coincidence, because if I’m not mistaken the nomenclature has medieval origins and I don’t know why it was called that; in Villanova di Guidonia (Rome) there is the Maritime Theater of Hadrian, known as Villa Adriana: it is built in concentric circles like the capital of Atlantis, right in a place called Villanova; in Sardinia there was a Neapolis, in the Oristano area, and Neapolis is the name of Naples, and Nea Polis means new city, in the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean style.
Other linguistic oddities: the insistent Sardinian-Corsican use of diphthongs in toponymy:
with the diphthong “ei” : Orosei, Baunei, Bultei, Burcei, Furtei, Gergei, Urzulei, Lanusei, Lei, Musei, Pauli Arbarei, Pèifugas, Costa Rei, San Niccolò Gerrei, Triei, Mara Arbarèi all places that end with the diphthong “ei” ”;
with the diphthong “ai” : Allai, Paizé, Gairu, Ollollai, Illorai, Lotzorai, Masainas, Olzai, Onifai, Samatzai, Ulassai, Ussassai, La Trinitài and Vignola, Villagrande Strisaili;
with the diphthong “oi” : Gavoi, Jaròi/Geràni, Loiri Porto San Paolo, Mammoiada;
with the diphthong “au” : Ardauli, Austis, Ballau, Bauladu, Baunei, Giaùni/Jaùni, Lòiri Poltu Santu Pàulu, Paùli, Narcàu, Lu Palàu, Paùli Arbarèi, Pàu, Pàulle, Paùli Gerrèi/Pàùli Xrexèi, Santu Sparàu, Tempio Pausania ,
Gonnos fanadiga, Gonnos nò, Gonnos codina, Gonnos tramatza, all places that contain the suffix Gonnos;
Some of these facts could be coincidences.
Warning: this site contains experimental research by a non-professional, so there may be logical or methodological errors in the research. Scientists will be able to skim errors from correct information. What matters is the possible useful information that can derive from it.
Names of cities/towns/hamlets that need to be analyzed more seriously:
Teulada in Sardinia corresponds to Teulada in Spain
Aritzo in Sardinia corresponds to Aritzu in the Basque country
Monastir in Sardinia corresponds to Monastir in Tunisia
Orani in Sardinia corresponds to Orano in Algeria
Pula in Sardinia corresponds to Pula in the former Yugoslavia
Palau in Sardinia corresponds to Palau , province of Lleida in Spain, and Palau in Micronesia
Sa Baronia in Sardinia corresponds to La Baronia de Rialb , 25747, Province of Lleida, Spain; but it also corresponds to Sa Baronia located in the Sierra de Tramuntana , declared a World Heritage Site, just 25 km from Palma de Mallorca.
Tethys in Sardinia corresponds to the Tethys Sea, the Titan Tethys son of Uranus and Gaia and a Pharaoh called Tethys
Sa Portedda in Sulcis corresponds to La Portella in Catalonia, Spain
Memphis in Sicily corresponds to a second Memphis in Sicily and a Memphis in Egypt
Amarnas in Algeria corresponds to Amarna in Egypt, the modern name of Akhetaton, city of Akhenaten
to Gadeiros , brother of the Sulcitan Atlas and son of Poseidon and Clitus, corresponds Gadir (Cadiz) corresponds Gadir in Morocco, Agadir in Morocco, Port of Gadir in Pantelleria, Bay of Ghadira in Malta; furthermore, now we understand why Plato speaks of the Gadirica region in front of the Pillars of Hercules: Gadirica was probably the region near the current Villasimius , but this remains to be verified
Cariddi in Sardinia corresponds to Cariddi in Sicily
Pompu corresponds to Pompeii in Italy and Pohnpei in Micronesia
Umbria in Italy corresponds to the Kingdom of Northumbria in England
Anglona in Sardinia corresponds to Anglia and Angleterre , land of the Angles
Gallura corresponds to Gaul, Gallipoli, Wales and the surname Gallus (probably many are just linguistic coincidences; however it is worth investigating and perhaps disproving these similarities in a scientific way )
Bithinia corresponds to Bithia
Olbia in Sardinia corresponded to Olbia in Egypt and is mentioned in ancient history books
Alguier (Alghero) corresponds to Algiers
Bari corresponds to Bari Sardo in Sardinia
Meana corresponds to Meana Sardo in Sardinia
Prato corresponds to Prato Sardo in Sardinia
Riola corresponds to Riola Sardo in Sardinia
Neapolis (in Greek: Νεάπολις; in Sardinian: Nabui) or “new city”, was an ancient city in Sardinia corresponds to Neapolis, the ancient name of Naples in Italy
to the locality Tempio- Ampurias , Ampurias Beach , corresponds in Spain to Empúries , 17130, Province of Girona, Spain, called Ampurias in Spanish .
the French locality Pau corresponds to the surname Pau , very frequent and perhaps originating from Sulcis ; someone might even go so far as to notice that, while in the French language the diphthong “au” is read “o”, and therefore Pau in French is read “Pò”, there is an Occitan pronunciation, which as present in Wikipedia under the entry Pau_(France ) , is pronounced exactly Pau, as in the Sardinian language , at least partially confirming my statements. It would be interesting to do a study on Occitan, to see if there could be connections with the languages and dialects of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, as also happens with the Corsican, Basque, Sicilian, Romanian and many others;
Caria is a Sardinian surname which corresponds to Caria , which was a historical region in western Anatolia;
Solanas is a Sardinian town and Solanas is both a Sardinian and Spanish surname :
Solanas is a Spanish surname . Notable people with the surname include:
perhaps these are not coincidences. It is first necessary to go back to the first original toponyms, to understand if they have been changed recently or if they are ancient or the original ones. I propose to study these correspondences: whether the name has to do with a sort of direct domination, colonization or relationship of some kind has yet to be officially demonstrated with more robust evidence.
We have seen the surname Sais , the surname Pau , but the surname Usai is also interesting: the Usai Mummy exists in Bologna , which demonstrates the contacts between the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean population and ancient Egypt. In fact, Usai is an exclusively Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean surname: throughout the world, those called Usai are of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origins . Uras is a Sardinian surname, Sardinian country and Sumerian deity. Cabras is a Sardinian surname, Cabras is a Sardinian town and in Cabras they found the Giants of Mont’E Prama, and ” cabras” in Sardinian means “goats”, which is a term that probably originated in the Paleolithic or Neolithic, as goats definitely marked the transition from hunters to breeders and farmers. Sinis is a surname and Sinis is a location. Piras is a surname and Piras is a locality . With the Usai mummy we have the presence of Sardinian-Corsican surnames in Ancient Egypt, and this should give us pause. It is difficult to explain in a few words, I will do it in another context: the Sumerians, the Akkadians and the Babylonians, with very high probability, were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations in times that scientists will now have to recalculate based on new discoveries. It will be difficult and wonderful, having to go through all the lyrics again and try to find our way around. However, I can give you some insights: there are probably links between the Sardinian surname Cadelanu , Candelanu and Kandalanu , a Neo-Babylonian king; between the town of Sarroch in Sardinia and Dur- Šarrukin of Nineveh; these discoveries open the doors to a new type of approach to Sumerian and Mesopotamian culture in general. The gods of Sumerian mythology were miners … and Sulcis itself has the oldest mine in Italy and perhaps in Europe: if it still provides resources now, what must it have been like 11,000 years ago?
Now: if a scientist had serious intentions, he could, starting from my observations, do further research. In this way, little by little, perhaps it will come out that the Pharaoh Teti of the VI dynasty who reigned in Egypt came out of the city of Teti in Sardinia … Perhaps we will realize that two Pharaohs are called Pepi I and Pepi II: but Pepi or Peppi in Sardinia it is the diminutive of Giuseppi , i.e. Giuseppe (it may be a simple coincidence) . Even today in Sardinia people called Giuseppe are nicknamed Pepi to demonstrate affection, familiarity and friendship.
You might realize that the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans often assigned the same name to various cities, so we have two places called Memphis in Sicily and we have ancient Memphis in Egypt … we have Akrotiri in Cyprus and Akrotiri in Santorini ; Gadir (Cadiz) in Spain has the equivalent Port of Gadir in Pantelleria, and Gadir and Agadir in Morocco , because the names of some villages and port locations are Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean. It would explain why Umbria exists and the Kingdom of Northumbria exists in England. Murgia is a Sardinian surname and “ le Murgie or la Murgia ” is an Italian locality.
Doing this type of research takes time and patience, it is not an easy thing. But I hope I have given you excellent starting input, which can make your work easier.
Here are some examples that could open up new, totally innovative research ideas that, I believe, have perhaps never been explored before:
Sardi Maurreddus of Maurreddanìa in Mauretania and in Mauritania;
Sardinian Maltamonenses from Malta;
Sardinian Galillenses in Galilee; in this regard, see the article present here ; the commentary by Bartolomeo Porcheddu ; it is now also known to archaeologists that an entire Sardinian city dating back to at least between the 12th and 11th centuries BC was discovered and unearthed on Mount Carmel;
Sardinian Patuanenses Campani in Campania;
Sardinian Beronicenses seem connected with the Veronicenses then Veronienses, passing through Etruscan Tuscany;
Sardinian Ilienses-Troes seem to be the founders of Ilium-Troia , which is why Ilium, i.e. the city of Troy, was created using concentric circles. They represented the Sacred Furrows of Sulcis (Sulcus, Sulci, Latin ablative locative in Sulcis, to be translated as “The place of the Furrows” [Traced by Poseidon around the hill where his wife Clitus lived]);
Sardinians from Gallura appear to be connected with Gaul ;
The Sardinian Balares were probably the rulers of the Baleares ( Balearic Islands );
The Sardinians of Laconi owned Laconia in Greece;
Furthermore, the Sumerian and Mesopotamian religions are full of Sardinian terms, surnames and names : this fact should give pause for thought.
Uras, Sardinian surname, name of a Sumerian deity;
Kadelanu, a Sardinian surname, becomes the name of a Mesopotamian King Kandelanu;
Sarroch, name of country, becomes King Sarrukkin in Mesopotamia;
S’iskuru, a Sardinian way of saying, in Mesopotamia is the god Iskur;
Samassi, a Sardinian town, is the Sumerian god Samas;
Uta, a Sardinian village, is the god Utu;
Sinnai, a Sardinian village, is the Mesopotamian god Sin-Nanna;
Maybe we should start asking ourselves a thousand questions from new points of view.
In my opinion, a total revision of the historical, geographical, geological, commercial and construction sources is now necessary… from my point of view, an immediate and decisive paradigm shift is necessary: the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Paradigm .
Another strangeness of Sardinian surnames : they seem to be very ancient and have a deictic function , suffice it to say that some are “Pani” and “Casu”, “bread” and “cheese” ; “Boi” ox ; and the bull was sacred to the Atlanteans. This too could be a research lead: perhaps the surnames were born in the Paleolithic or Neolithic in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block? This could explain why many currently existing surnames ideophonically represent concepts: bread, cheese, ox, crow ( Pani, Casu, Boi, Crobu ), with a 1:1 relationship with reality, i.e. each surname corresponds to a real existing object .
Isis is the mother of Horus (Horus, Gold) in Egyptian mythology. In Sardinia, the locality Isidoro (Isis + Gold) is present right in Sulcis, a terminology that had religious value. With the advent of the Christian religion, in an attempt to convert the Sardinians to the new religion, everything possible was done to bring these terms back to Christianity, so the archaic terminology Isidore began to be associated with the figure of a saint, Sant’ Isidore. Now this passage can be very clear to the reader’s eyes.
In fact, in Sardinia, very ancient representations of Isis and Gold (Horo, Horus) have been found, which archaeologists have generally always brought back to Egyptian culture, overturning the real facts, as I will try to show in all the reasoning on this website. Isis and Horus were figures of Sulcis, taught in Mesolithic and Neolithic times to the Egyptians. This would explain the cult of Isis in Spain, in Pompeii, in Rome… what was the point of venerating only one divinity from the Egyptian Pantheon? Very simple: the goddess was a deity of Sulcis as the Atlantean capital, and the cult was widespread throughout the Mediterranean; However, Egypt also preserved many other aspects of the cult taught and handed down by the Sardinian Atlanteans, for which Isis was only one of the ancient divinities.
08 April 2023, 06:32
A few minutes ago I realized that French also behaves like Sardinian, at least in one case:
Samzun is a surname, and it is also a place where there is a prehistoric megalithic circle, precisely on what I hypothesize to be the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean routes that allowed the spread of megalithism across the European coasts in particular. It is necessary to do research to understand if and which surnames exist in France that are also toponyms.
The cult of the bull remains in the names, yet to be verified, of Gioia Tauro and Taurianova .
The Hesperides Islands and the Garden of the Hesperides
After the semi-submergence of the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian block, only the mountainous areas of the island of Atlantis remained above water, and were interpreted as two islands. But thousands of years had to pass before they were called Sardinia and Corsica. At first they were called the Hesperides Islands, where there was a garden of golden fruits, called the Garden of the Hesperides.
The extreme end of the world was called Caput Terrae, Capoterra in present-day Sardinia.
In Capoterra there was the Garden of the Hesperides, which had golden fruits: it is not clear to the writer whether these golden fruits were lemons, or yellow apples or who knows what other gold-colored fruit. This time too, the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian toponymy comes to our aid: in Capoterra, in the province of Cagliari, there is a place still called Frutti d’Oro today.
It is difficult to explain in a few words, I will do it in another context: the Sumerians, the Akkadians and the Babylonians , with very high probability, were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations in times that scientists will now have to recalculate based on new discoveries. It will be difficult and wonderful, having to go through all the texts again and try to find your way around. However, I can give you some insights: there are probably links between the Sardinian surname Cadelanu , Candelanu and Kandalanu, a Neo-Babylonian king ; between the town of Sarroch in Sardinia and Dur- Šarrukinof Nineveh; these discoveries open the doors to a new type of approach to Sumerian and Mesopotamian culture in general.
Atlantis was larger than Libya and Asia combined: now, by inverse procedure, we can deduce the size of these two geographical realities in around 9600 BC. The people who advanced boldly and wanted to conquer all the peoples who lived beyond the Pillars of Hercules, therefore, were the Sardo Corso Atlanteans who inhabited the Sardo Corso geological block when it was still dry land, before the submersion in around 9600 BC. The whole of Sulcis (Sulcis is a geographical area of lower Sardinia, west of Cagliari) is very rich in Atlantean toponymy: Acquacadda ,Acquafredda (city that disappeared in the Middle Ages), Castello di Acquafredda , S’Acqua Callenti de Susu , S’Acqua Callenti de Baxiu , Acqua Callentis (another hamlet meaning Hot Water ), over three thousand two hundred Sardinian toponyms just by searching for the portion of the word ” funt” (“funti” or “fonti” means “source” in at least one of the variants of Sardinian). It is possible to counter-verify my statements with Google Maps and with the Sardinian database of regional toponyms, as well as in the ways you deem appropriate.
In fact, Plato narrates that the island of Atlantis was rich in water. And in fact the world-renowned Sardinian linguist Salvatore Dedola (a supergenius that you will absolutely have to study in depth, together with Bartolomeo Porcheddu, another extraordinary scholar ) shows that Sassari, Thatari (Sardinian name for Sassari) and Serramanna, to give just one example, mean “Rich in Water”. Toponymy and onomastics confirm the Platonic myth. It will be necessary to open sector studies to bring new information to that which has so far been collected and demonstrated, and it is necessary that they be carried out by professionals in the sector.
SARDINIAN ODDITIES OF ATLANTIDEE COURSE
Regarding the Gadirica area, it is possible that it was the name not of Gadir (Cadiz), but of a geographical area of the same name in the Sardinian-Corsican block, now submerged. Why would he have the same name as Gadir? For the same reason why Teulada in Sardinia has the equivalent Teulada in Spain ; Pula has a Pula in Dalmatia ; Aritzo in Sardinia corresponds to Aritzu in Spain ; Monastir in Sardinia corresponds to Monastir in Tunisia , Alguier (Alghero) corresponds to Algiers in Algeria , the Su Vaticanu district of Santadi corresponds to the Vatican in Rome , Pompu in Sardinia corresponds to Pompeii , Bari corresponds to Bari Sardo, and I could go on and on, but I would risk boring you. For this reason, Gadir della Gadirica, in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, would correspond to Gadir (i.e. Cadiz) .
PLATONIC MEASUREMENTS
Taking the major diagonal that cuts the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, we obtain that it measures approximately 555 kilometres; this measurement appears, calculated in stages, in the measurements provided by Critias to describe the island. If we exclude “the band of mountains that fall directly onto the sea” (i.e. the mountains now present in Corsica and the right side of Sardinia such as the Gennargentu), measuring the rectangular perimeter of the remaining territory currently semi-submerged, it is greater than 10,000 stages exactly as stated by Plato. It is therefore possible that the Scientific Community will carry out independent measurements to verify the veracity of these statements.
THE TIMEUS DOES NOT ONLY TALK ABOUT ASTRONOMY, BUT ALSO ABOUT GEOLOGY
To summarize for clarity: the priests of the city of Sais in Egypt were trying, in their own way, to explain to Solon a geological event of submergence of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block in the center of the Mediterranean, a sea which in 9600 BC was called the Atlantic Ocean or Atlantic (it took its name from the island of Atlantis, the largest of all before it ended up half-submerged). Atlantis was therefore even larger than Sicily, which now, after its sinking, appears to be the largest island, and not Sardinia.
Therefore the period of the sinking would be around, approximately, 9600 BC, unlike the hypothesis of the Sardinian Nuragic Atlantis, which is clearly incorrect also for the reasons listed elsewhere by Sardinian archaeologists .
Stratigraphic analyzes must go into the ground until finding the remains from around 11,600 years ago, in order to find the remains of the “capital” of Atlantis or its population, and it is also very clear why no bodies of the deceased Atlanteans have been found in the nuragic layers.
COLUMNS OF HERCULES IN THE CHANNEL OF SICILY: NEW ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
Frau (2002), whom I sincerely thank for his extraordinary contributions to the discipline, places the Pillars of Hercules between Sicily and Tunisia . In fact, there is a possibility that these have been found. In fact, the Scientific Community around the world is in the process of analyzing the very recent discovery of what appear to be anthropic structures located right in the Strait of Sicily, found through bathymetric analyzes of the Emodnet System of the European Union , in Birsa Bank and El Haouaria Bank , exactly between Sicily and Tunisia, and a short distance from Pantelleria. A second anomalous discovery from a bathymetric point of view was made, ofa structure with an apparent rectangular shape in the Sicily-Malta continental carbonate platform , flanked by the Sicily-Malta Continental Scarp (Sicily-Malta Escarpment for geologists) .
The scientific world has not yet expressed its opinion on the matter ; it is not even known whether studies are being carried out on the matter. 5 computerized and independent bathymetric systems were used, programmed and managed independently, which returned the same results, which suggests that these structures really exist on the seabed. The cost of a shipment, however, is prohibitive for a single individual, and it will be necessary to wait for the intervention of third parties.
THE MUD AROUND THE ISLAND OF ATLANTIS
Why then was everything around the submerged Sardinian Corsican island full of mud that prevented navigation ? Because the sea currents, after the sinking of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, began to tear away layers of soil that emerged from the surface as Sardinia does now, creating over the millennia what geologists today call the Sardinian “continental platform”. race . As sea currents “washed” away layers of soil, destroying all the inhabited centers and structures that had been built before 9600 BC on the Sardinian-Corsican coastal strips, the water was clouded by muddy materials, and this is clear and obvious to thought and reflection.
GENETICS
In Atlantis “the oldest old people lived”, and we all know about the Corsican Sardinian centenarians , to the point that the Sardinian genetic code not only has been and is studied all over the world, but has even been stolen (see the theft of 25,000 test tubes with 17 under investigation, following the theft of the Sardinian DNA samples which according to the press occurred at the Genos Park in Perdasdefogu in August 2016). That the Sardinian-Corsican block is ancient for the ancients is obvious to educated scholars: it is enough to mention the discovery of a fragment of carapace of Arthropleura armata from the Carboniferous of Iglesias (PAS Museum – EA Martel of Carbonia) , but those interested can inquire at a paleontologist, one above all the extraordinary Daniel Zoboli.It is therefore obvious that the erudite Egyptians were able, from many details, to understand the antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican block , which they called Atlantis .
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
The Temple of Horus in Edfu, Egypt: reinterpretation of the texts based on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm
In Egypt, in the city of Edfu , there is a temple entirely covered in hieroglyphs. There are various translations, which are difficult to achieve also due to the content: in fact, in the majority of these texts the origin of civilization, the origin of the world, is narrated .
The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm helps in deciphering these texts, helping to clarify the meaning of a good part of them; to understand better, however, it is necessary to provide the reader with some basic information which will then allow them to understand almost the entire text.
In the Temple of Edfu, the Mediterranean Sea is called “The Eternal Lake”, “The Eternal Lake” or “The Primordial Waters” . In the Eternal Lake there was an island that lay in the primordial waters, i.e. the Sardinian block when this was a single land that emerged, over 11,600 years ago, during the Pleistocene. This same island is called by Plato, in the dialogues entitled Timaeus and Critias, with the name of Atlantis. The historical narrative is the same, but some different terms are used to describe the same things. By combining the texts of Timaeus and Critias with the information carved in the Temple of Edfu, it is possible to obtain further information useful for understanding the prehistoric past of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean island and its relations with the ancient Egyptian world.
Since I didn’t know these texts, I will slowly begin to try to make them translatable by relying on all the information that has been provided to us by the Platonic texts and by new scientific discoveries of various kinds: archaeological, genetic, geographical, linguistic, etc.
For the analysis of hieroglyphic writing, I will make use of the typewriter available online here: https://discoveringegypt.com/egyptian-hieroglyphic-writing/hieroglyphic-typewriter/
I will try to rewrite the Edfu texts trying to make them clearer for a contemporary citizen, replacing all the ancient terms with modern ones. For example, instead of “Eternal Lake” I will write “Mediterranean Sea”, instead of “Isola dell’Uovo” I will write “Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean semi-submerged island”, and so on.
The primordial world of the Gods is an island (in hieroglyph iw) partly covered by reeds, which lay in the darkness of the primordial waters of the Mediterranean, occupied by Mesolithic inhabitants whose DNA was analyzed in two out of three individuals from the rock shelter of Su Carroppu, in present-day Sardinia.
This population was considered divine, it is not yet clear why. Perhaps because they were culturally far ahead of the rest of the world’s population. They probably already knew some metallurgy in the Mesolithic (I still have to prove it) and this was perceived by other peoples as a divine characteristic. In fact, Nekhbet and other deities have the symbol of metallurgy in their paws, which in my opinion is also the symbol that the Egyptians used to indicate Sulcis or their origin from mining Sulcis. Among the creator gods, it seems that Ptah has a very important role. Now, at the moment it is still unclear whether this has anything to do with Poseidon. At present it is still difficult to understand, I am forced to study Egyptology to try to understand the possible connections. Some information can be found in the Shabaka Stone. The texts on creation are of the Heliopolitan or Hermopolitan type, from the respective cities in which the texts were found engraved on the walls. The first Egyptian pharaohs were probably inhabitants of the Sardinian block, that is, of what for the Egyptians was the Primordial Island or Egg Island. The priest who speaks to Solon in Timaeus and Critias, in fact, points out that at the beginning the Sardinian-Atlanteans had arrogantly attempted to invade the entire Mediterranean. Gobekli Tepe could be an Atlantean Sardinian colony before the submergence. The partial submergence of the island and the death of millions of inhabitants, and the destruction of many cities and works of art must have been a tremendous trauma for the Sardinian settlers in Turkey.
The myth continues: first it is Atum, the god who hovers over the waters; then appears the pyramid-shaped hill from which the sun originated, and Atum climbed it. Atum was bisexual; he cried, and the tears became men and women. He had a son, and Geb, the earth, male and lying down, and Nut, a woman clinging to him, were born. Atum made them separate from the air, Shu.
Atum hovering over the waters is then taken up by the Bible: “And the spirit hovered over the waters”, in Genesis, before creation. Geb and Nut had children: Isis, Osiris, Seth and Nephtys.
This is the myth of Heliopolis.
The Egyptian Creation Hermopolitana instead predicts that the sun was born from a mound. And in fact, around the world, there has been at least one civilization that has built a disproportionate quantity of mounds. Even in the United States. This should at least give pause for thought. Now, in Sulcis there is a structure made in this way, but I don’t know if it’s just a coincidence.
In short, all Platonic statements, if placed in the right context, are rational and correctly explainable. However, they require a certain mental humility, a certain “disposition to listen”. Since they are strong statements, which have consequences, they probably require a few months of reflection and meditation before they can be assimilated and digested correctly. On the other hand, it has been 2600 years (since the time of Solon) that no one understood what the island of Atlantis was, indeed, it was stated almost everywhere that Plato was exaggerating. Regarding the submergence/sinking of the Sardinian island of Corsican Atlantis , this would be a problem of a geological nature, where I can only make hypotheses. For example, there can be at least three concomitant causes: Meltwater Pulses, in particular the meltwater pulse 1b, also studied by NASA technicians. Furthermore, geological settlement movements due to what geology experts call “ slab roll-back ”. Furthermore, it has even been hypothesized, but still being verified, that a tectonic fault passes under the Sulcis, the same one that passes under Pompeii and Herculaneum, arrives under the Sulcis and continues up to Gibraltar . In possible support of the thesis that Atlantis is the partially submerged Sardinian-Corsican island and its currently submerged continental shelf, we highlight here some scientific evidence. On February 28, 2017, a study was published in the journal Scientific Reports of the Nature group which presents new archaeogenetic data. These data strengthen the archaeological evidence of the clear cultural discontinuity between the first inhabitants of the island, dating back to around 11 thousand years ago, and the architects of its definitive population which took place around 3000 years later, with the arrival of the first farmer-breeder settlers . This important discovery is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from the skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia . At the moment, these remains represent the oldest evidence of human presence on the island. Now, from 9600 BC to today approximately 9600 + 2023 years have passed, i.e. 11623. The evidence cited above is precisely from 11000 years ago. A study was conducted on the clear cultural discontinuity between the first visitors to the island of Sardinia around 11,000 years ago and the architects of its stable and definitive population, which occurred around 3,000 years later with the arrival of the first farmer-breeder settlers. The study is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from the skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia, which represent the oldest direct evidence of human presence on the island. The study is part of the research project financed by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia on the history of the first Neolithic settlement of the island. The obtained genetic sequences were compared with ancient and modern data and revealed a large difference in the genetic variability of the island’s current population compared to the first humans who frequented it, with most of the genetic variability appearing to have been determined by migratory flow of populations who introduced the productive economy starting from the most ancient Neolithic. The Mesolithic sequences of the Su Carroppu samples belong to the groups called J2b1 and I3, which have very low or low frequencies in Europe. The relevance of the scientific discovery stimulates the intensification of research in the key site of Su Carroppu, already investigated between the years 1960-1970 and currently the subject of systematic excavations directed by the University of Cagliari. Good research to all of you. If anyone is interested, the theory of Atlantis as the Sardinian-Corsican island and its entire continental shelf currently submerged, can also explain other things in a very intuitive way. For example, the Greeks and Romans probably thought that the submergence of the Corsican Sardinian geological block had been a punishment from the gods for the arrogant inhabitants, who “had forcefully attempted, in one fell swoop, to invade the lands on this side of the Colonne D’ Ercole (perhaps located in the current Birsa Bank, an apparently anthropized underwater mountain beneath the Sicilian Channel, data scientifically verified via Emodnet bathymetry). First I was trying to clarify the toponymy. Now we can try to clarify the onomastics: the Gods punished the Sardinian-Corsicans, called “Atlanteans” by the Egyptians, according to what was stated in the Platonic texts around 9600 BC, “crushing the Sardinian-Corsican island under his feet, and it sank” (the quote is my hypothesis). And this easily explains why the Greeks called Sardinia Ichnusa (footprint) and the Romans called it Sandalia (sandalwood print). Even the name is now very clear: they were Greeks and Romans who mocked Sardinia, which was what remained of the great Sardinian-Corsican power, which the Egyptians called “Atlantis” in the story told to Solon, who told it to Dropides, who spoke about it to Critias grandfather, who told me about it to Critias grandson, who told Socrates in the Platonic dialogues of Timaeus and Critias. If any reader wants to know the original history of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, before it sank around 9600 BC, he is obliged to read Timaeus and Critias, two texts written by the Greek Plato. All the rest of the texts published up to now have done nothing but add entropy, chaos, confusion, in the history of the Sardinian-Corsican bloc, as characters like Cayce or Madame Blavatsky, professional charlatans, used the topic of Atlantis to make money, publishing books full of lies and entertaining the curious, especially after they saw that Ignatius Donnelly’s book entitled ATLANTIS: THE ANTEDILUVIAN WORLD, had had an incredible media coverage worldwide. Cinema and television, then, have introduced a lot of nonsense on the topic of Atlantis, so when we talk about this topic many have in mind parts of films or cartoons or fantasy books that have nothing to do with it that Plato said. Hence: the Greek name Ichnusa, and Latin Sandalia, confirm my hypothesis that the ancients thought that the gods punished the Sardinian-Corsican island by crushing it under their feet. A geological science as we understand it today did not yet exist. Furthermore:the Wadati-Benioff tectonic fault that passes under Pompeii and Herculaneum, and which destroyed them, is probably the same one that continues up to the Sulcis in present-day Sardinia and continues until it reaches the present-day Strait of Gibraltar. Since this fault is activated in geological time, the citizens who live in Sulcis are not aware of the seismic activity. When this releases its elastic energy, frightening disasters occur, such as the opening of the Strait of Gibraltar, the destruction of cities and places such as Pompeii and Herculaneum, or the submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican island. But the submergence is probably also due to another very important cause: the geological adjustment of the Sardinian-Corsican island following the “slab roll-back” which, as revealed to us by the ancient Egyptian priest, occurred in around 9600 BC. The Slab Roll-Back, concomitant with the tectonic awakening of the fault present under the Sulcis and currently unknown to official geology which instead knows of a fault further south that runs along Africa, and perhaps also due to the succession of various post-Wurm glaciation Meltwater Pulses, they caused the partial submergence of the Sardo Corsa island. Now,out of the water, only the tops of the mountains remained, which we now believe to be separate islands, and which our civilization now knows by the names of Sardinia and Corsica. Furthermore, all the toponymy and onomastics present in Sulcis leave a question: why do all these Sulcis places recall Plato’s story? We can then take up the Platonic text again to try to understand the reason. First of all, if the Pillars of Hercules were located on Birsa Bank, and the Sardinian-Corsican island and its currently submerged continental shelf is really Atlantis, this means that in 9600 BC it was customary to call the current Mediterranean Sea with the name of Sea Atlantic (i.e. sea of the island of Atlantis) or Atlantic Ocean (ocean of the currently submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, i.e. Atlantis). I haven’t read Frau (2002) yet, so I don’t know if he has already published some of my statements, in which case I apologize in advance. Mine are just reflections resulting from the reasoning made in the last two years. Please let me know of any shortcomings or apparent plagiarisms, thanks in advance. If all this is true, then perhaps Poseidon was a man, and obviously not a deity (because, have you ever met one in person?), and this man fell in love with a teenager whose parents had died, Clito. The Platonic tale states that Poseidon surrounded the hill with water channels. Now, Sulcis itself (but look at what a coincidence! Or maybe it’s not a coincidence?) is of a volcanic nature, so right in the center of Sulcis there is a hill or mountain, if you like, not too high, and this is visible using satellite systems such as Google Maps or Google Earth, which even allows you to tilt the view by pressing the shift key on the computer keyboard. But are these places really ancient as Plato says or are they very recent places? Easy to verify: right in the center of Sulcis, you can verify that the prehistoric caves IS ZUDDAS exist, and nearby there is ACQUACADDA (Poseidon placed two sources there, one of cold water and one of hot water, and the place is called Acquacadda …but look at what an incredible coincidence! Of course I have an imagination!) and very ancient archaeological finds were found in the town of Acquacadda. Now an expert might object that the finds, for example, are only from 6000 years ago. Note: an expert should look for the stratigraphic layers of 9600 BC: only then would it be possible to obtain more detailed information. Instead, currently groups of children are brought to these places to watch. In my opinion this is dangerous but I am not a stratigraphy specialist, so I have no say in the matter. Also in Sulcis, the Su Benatzu Cave was found, which is an authentic archaeological treasure, which could contribute to research on the topic “what happened in the millennia after the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean island?” (I need to develop this topic). Furthermore, in support of the theory of the submerged Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis, there is another scientific discovery of marine archaeology: the discovery of a load of 39 orichalcum ingots by the extraordinary Sebastiano Tusa off the coast of Gela, in Sicily. Newspaper articles speculate that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information about the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located very close away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” which began about 40 million years ago, after the detachment of the block from the current coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a grain of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if they turn out to be incorrect in the future). It is possible to know this, as the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi states, because a lot of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, who showed how the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Hispanic-French coasts. Furthermore, the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia presents various types of Graben Horst may also have contributed to the possible submergence, so these geological accommodations may also have contributed to important and significant telluric movements for the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean people. who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Graben Horst. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites” present, to which the Sapiens program of the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi dedicated videos (see: “The Graptolites of Goni a Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we must verify again what Plato said. Atlantis also dominated Libya and Tyrrhenia in the Mediterranean, and many islands scattered across the Ocean (remember that we have already shown that Ocean, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Sea of Corsica and Sardinia, and not the present-day Atlantic Ocean). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were also linguistic influences? But of course, and the proof already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages and the Corsican language, the Sicilian “dialect” (or should we say the language?) (Minimum dictionary. Sardinian Corsican Sicilian. Correspondences in Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others),mainstream as no one imagined the enormous importance of this type of work, which shows to all intents and purposes that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean languages have spread throughout the Mediterranean. And now, thinking about it, we can begin to understand that even in the study of languages there has been an inversion: it was believed that Sardinian resembled Spanish and Portuguese because we were “dominated” by them in recent history, while probably Spanish and Portuguese languages, on the other hand, were imposed by the prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean dominion of which, until now, we were not aware. La Nuova Sardegna dedicated an article on the subject entitled: «That thread that binds the Sardinians with the Basques» by Paolo Curreli in which an exceptional and brilliant linguist noticed this Sardinian Corsican Atlantean linguistic heritage, and made it known to the world with his extraordinary works (from the article: “Hundreds of similar words in the study of Elexpuru Arregi. Many linguistic affinities Two towns with the same names: Aritzo and Aritzu. But also Uri and Aristanus. Holly in Sardinian, galostiu, in Basque is gorostoi”). But Atlantidologists cannot get to these texts if no one shows their correlation with the theme of Atlantis. There is therefore still a lot of work to do, and this is just the beginning of a new era of studies. The peoples of the Corsican Sardinian block therefore influenced in prehistory the evolution of the current languages and dialects and minority languages of part of the Mediterranean and perhaps also of other places. Here is now explained in a very simple and crystalline way why Sardinian, Corsican, Sicilian, Basque, Spanish, Portuguese, the Veronese dialect (see for example all the names of asparagus, vegetables etc. which are identical to the Sardinian ones) and who knows which others are so similar. Now that we have this information, we can resume the extraordinary work ofProfessor Bartolomeo Porcheddu and compare ourselves with your statements, which are now all perfectly correct and all not only explainable, but even understandable and obvious to reason. What Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu states is right and correct (in my eyes it is obvious, there is no need to even underline it, but in interviews one sometimes gets the impression that his theses are considered “fringe theories”, as if they were pseudo -science, while instead they are a demonstration of extraordinary genius and intuition). There are various sites that show how various scholars were already realizing the linguistic similarities between languages and dialects of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and other languages and dialects scattered across the Mediterranean in particular, see also this article. Yet another article that talks about it is this. In short, by now serious scholars were realizing that there was information that we were not aware of, as if there really was an ancient Civilization that was missing from the roll call of Ancient History, as Graham Hancock states: this civilization is the one that lived in Corsican Sardinian geological block currently semi-submerged, when this was an island and emerged land: Graham Hancock was therefore right on this point. The impact of this extraordinary discovery creates a sort of shock in the scholar’s mind: in fact, now there is a sense of disorientation, of distrust. How is it possible that almost no one had ever noticed, if we exclude some brilliant scholars who were even mocked for their statements? How is it possible that Plato was not believed? Even Aristotle himself did not believe him: “He who dreamed of Atlantis also made it disappear.” In conclusion: the elderly Egyptian priest was telling Solon, in around 590 BC, that the Greeks are a young people, as the literati cyclically died due to the catastrophes that periodically occur on the planet, and therefore their opinions on the past were like of fairy tales, because they had not fixed historical events in written language. The Egyptians, on the other hand, fixed information on stone, so they had memories of facts that had become grayed by time. And he doesn’t immediately tell him about Atlantis, he talks to him about the first Athens, founded around 9600 BC, i.e. 1000 years before the city of Sais in Egypt. At that time, the Greeks accomplished the most extraordinary feat of all: they managed to free all the peoples of the Mediterranean from the invasion of one people, Professor Sergio Frau (2002) realized that ” Sardinia is Atlantis “, while in reality it is a plateau of the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian geological block, and therefore tried to make the Island of Atlas coincide with Sardinia. The problem is that Sardinia is only a subset of Atlantis, so the entire Sardinian continental shelf was missing, which is currently submerged as the Platonic story of Timaeus and Critias says, and the mountainous area north of the island of Atlantis was missing, the emerged part of which is today called “Corsica”. Furthermore, Corsica was ceded to France, terribly complicating the research even more: in fact, human beings mentally, seeing that one part is Italian and one French, instinctively think that they are two different realities, while in reality they are the same submerged island , as world-renowned geologists have already confirmed to me that they know. But geologists call this submerged island millennia ago with the name of “Corsican Sardinian geological block”, while the Egyptian priest who told Solon could not use the terms “Sardinia” and “Corsica” which did not yet exist. Then archaeologists, using the scientific method, verified Frau’s claims, and they realized that scientifically it didn’t add up, and they are right. In reality, both Frau and the archaeologists were right: Frau was right, as Sardinia is a subset of the Corsican Atlantean island of Sardinia. The archaeologists were right, as Sardinia is too small in size to be Atlantis. Furthermore, the dating given of the nuragic was unfortunately not correct, so it was rightly pointed out by our scientists. What is perplexing, perhaps, is the fact that Atlantis is a submerged island, so: why have the submerged bathymetries never been shown during hundreds of encounters? Why weren’t bathymetry experts summoned? This will likely remain a mystery for the next few years to come.
If you want to really understand Atlantis: study the geology of the submerged Sardinian Corsican block. Studying the Sardinian dwarf elephants found in Sardinia, called Mammuthus Lamarmorae. When Plato writes that “the species of elephants was present” he is talking about this animal, not Indian elephants. To understand Atlantis it is necessary to know the toponymy of Sulcis: “Poseidon placed two springs there, one of cold water and one of hot water”. The Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans in fact called the towns of Sulcis with the following names: Acquafredda (disappeared in the Middle Ages, but a Castle of Acquafredda remained in Siliqua), Acquacadda, S’acqua callenti de Susu, S’acqua callenti de Baxiu, Piscinas (perhaps following the submergence of the Sardinian geological block), the Zinnigas source still exists, Is Sais Superiore and Is Sais Inferiore (who probably gave their name to the city of Sais in Egypt where they told Solon about Atlantis). The Atlantean DNA has already been found and studied by Professor Carlo Lugliè, who has already SCIENTIFICALLY established that this population has a different DNA from that of the Neolithic people who populated Sardinia 3000 three thousand years later. Certain! If there was a catastrophe with the sinking of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, it is obvious that they died and then a population with different DNA arrived. In Sulcis Poseidon evidently loved caves. There were the caves of IS Zuddas and Acquacadda (here comes the theme of hot and cold water and therefore of sources). But when he moved north, he probably went to the caves of Alghero, which the Romans still knew as Neptune’s Caves. But Neptune is the Latin name of Poseidon! Therefore the caves of Neptune are the place of travel of this ancient ruler when he went to the north, probably to visit his children. Until today, it was thought that Poseidon / Neptune was a myth / legend, but instead he was a very ancient ruler, later deified. This fact is called “EVEMERISM”. I suggest all readers take a look, to learn new things. If what I say is true, can I prove it in some way? If a person is intelligent he can deduce it in the following way. The Mammuthus Lamarmorae have so far been found in at least 3 locations: Funtanammari in Gonnesa, in Alghero where there is Neptune’s cave, and if I’m not mistaken in Sinis. In Alghero we just said that there are Neptune’s Caves, so Poseidon went there, and they found the Sardinian dwarf mammoth there. If you analyze the toponymy of Gonnesa, they found another Dwarf Mammoth of the elephant species in Funtanamari, which means “Fountain by the sea”. But the fountain is a source of water! Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists cannot go so far as to pretend that the priest also taught him the language and the various Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean dialects. All those I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Corsican Sardinian block currently semi-submerged. Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists cannot go so far as to pretend that the priest also taught him the language and the various Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean dialects. All those I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Corsican Sardinian block currently semi-submerged. Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists cannot go so far as to pretend that the priest also taught him the language and the various Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean dialects. All those I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Corsican Sardinian block currently semi-submerged.
If Atlantis is really the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then some parts of prehistory and history will have to be rewritten all over again. I leave this job to you. I’m not capable of it. For me it has already been a superhuman effort to be able to put order in the midst of all this mess. I don’t care about fame. In my opinion, Professor Ugas came close when talking about the Atlantic coast of Africa, but in my opinion, to understand it better, he could delve deeper into Marco Ciardi’s text, when he talks about Bailly (Ciardi M., Atlantis A scientific controversy from Columbus to Darwin, Carocci editore, Rome, 1st edition, November 2002, p.92-97): in practice a part of the Atlantean colony colonized the area indicated by the ProfessorUgas, while Poseidon became the ruler of the now submerged Sardinian-Corsican island. It is important to note that the currently submerged Sardinian Corsican continental shelf is of immense size! That was an integral part of the island. 11,000 years of erosion by marine currents generated the mud that surrounded the island in Plato’s story, and this mud, by settling, cleaned the waters of present-day Sardinia, making them crystal clear. Furthermore, there is a very small desert in Sulcis. This desert, most likely, is artificial.
The Timaeus is not only a text of Astronomy, but also of Geology, given that it deals with the geological sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Paradigm shift , as explained in Thomas Kuhn’s book, The structure of scientific revolutions, how the ideas of science change, Einaudi, Turin, 1969: I called it ” The Sardinian Corsican Atlantean paradigm”. Previously everyone believed that orbits were circular, following Eudoxus of Cnidus, Aristotle and Ptolemy in the “Ipse Dixit” style. Then they realized, after an infinite number of tests, that the orbits are elliptical. Then another paradigm shift occurred: the Bible said that the earth was at the center of the Universe, and Copernicus said that the Sun was in the focus of the elliptical orbit. Galileo confirmed, and the Inquisition showed him the instruments of torture. Bruno was burned alive for advocating scientific truth. In my opinion, today we are once again faced with something extraordinary: a new paradigm shift. The island of Atlantis is the Egyptian name for the Sardinian-Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged, whose two plateaus that emerge out of the water are today known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica. Professor Carlo Lugliè’s studies show that the original Atlantean population, around 11,000 years ago, had a different DNA from the Neolithic people who populated 3000 years after the catastrophe, and lived mainly by procuring marine resources, and for this reason, the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean settlements they were located mainly on the coasts. It is for this reason that civilization was almost completely wiped out: because the Atlanteans inhabited the paleocoasts and these were submerged “in the short space of a day and a night of terrible earthquakes and floods”. Today science calls the Atlantean paleocoasts the “Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf”. Furthermore, there have been 11,000 years of marine currents that have eroded and destroyed coastal structures. Perhaps it is impossible to still find remnants of this civilization. Furthermore, the Andreotti Government allowed the United States to put a nuclear submarine base in La Maddalena, so the Americans have had at least half a century to carry out their raids with submarines in our waters. And since the Americans are smart, they put a “military base” right in Teulada, in Sulcis. But look, what a coincidence… Fantasy archaeology? Dear Superintendencies, where are your submarines for coastal exploration located? Where are your thousands of reports on the Sardinian-Corsican seabed? Where are the 3D bathymetries of the seabed? Or maybe they were never done? And where are the letters to the Ministers, asking to obtain these things? To obtain funding by explaining its immense importance for the history of human civilization? If Sardinian Corsican Atlantis sank on a date to be ascertained, why do we waste our breath and energy searching for Atlantis in the Nuragic layers? Once we assume the existence of Atlantis with Sulcis as its capital, we have a precise idea of where to look for the structures described by Plato: they must certainly be found in Sulcis
The dimensions coincide with what Plato stated, even the distance of the capital from the sea, about 8.8 kilometers. Perhaps the problem is that the structures could even be 100 meters underground, because at first glance it seems that they have been submerged by mountains of earth (this needs to be verified, but it is understandable to the eye). Professor Salvatore Dedola is a genius: he noticed the incredible overlap between Sardinian and Babylonian, Sumerian and Akkadian names. “There was a Paleo-Neolithic linguistic coenosis.” It is all right! The linguistic coenosis was caused by the Atlantean people of the Sardinian-Corsican coast, i.e. the same inhabitants whose DNA has already been analyzed in two out of three individuals from the rock shelter of Su Carroppu. The Sardinian-Atlanteans migrated across the Mediterranean, giving rise to the Cretan civilization which worshiped the bull exactly like the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans, would explain the highly evolved culture of the Minoans, as it had already been developed by the Sardinian Corsicans, the engraving of Poseidon’s trident found on the Palace of Knossos; and it would explain why Sardinian ingots are found in Crete, in Cyprus, and why in Cyprus there is Akrotiri and there is a second Akrotiri in Santorini, where an advanced civilization lived that even had toilets and pipes… It would explain why on Mount Carmel they then found structures from the Nuragic era. It would explain why Atlit-Yam, Pavlopetri, Herakleion/Thonis, Baia and who knows how many others that you haven’t even found yet… And it would also explain why Atlit-Yam had that name, given that perhaps Atlantis was the mother island from which they had migrated… Since laws existed in Atlantis (the orichalcum column with the laws engraved on it, on the top of which they poured bull’s blood? Does that sound familiar?), there is no be amazed that the descendants then created the Code of Hammurabi, strengthened by the legal knowledge developed in the previous millennia on the Sardinian-Atlantean geological block. Give me the benefit of the doubt for a moment longer.The Romans sought the Damnatio Memoriae for Atlantis. They subdued them, perhaps stripped the Neptune Caves of the little material that perhaps still remained, but continued to call them by their name. In short, they knew Poseidon/Neptune, for them he was still a historical figure. At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if names linked to Atlantis had been banned, and perhaps Atlas became Antas, which could clarify the toponym S’Antadi. I haven’t been able to research this and I’m absolutely not capable of doing so. and S’Antadi also appears in Sant’Antonio di Santadi (but look at what an incredible coincidence? The Americans have put a military base here too… but what a strange coincidence… and then in Perdas de Fogu there is another military base, precisely where they stole the DNA of the inhabitants… what a strange coincidence… but of course I have some imagination, huh? How about?)At the La Maddalena submarine military base, the Americans brought, unbelievable, moles to create some of the largest tunnels in the world at the time. Why? Why were the Americans interested in digging immense tunnels in and around La Maddalena? What were they looking for underground? Had they seen some type of metal via satellite (can it be done)? I understand if they bring a missile, if they bring other materials useful for military purposes, but what about moles for digging tunnels? Perhaps it could be interesting to analyze where military bases are located to extract other useful information. Nuclear submarines for the Mediterranean? Right halfway between Sardinia and Corsica? There were accidents, and the newspapers once reported that the submarine was actually in Teulada.
To learn more:
the Atlantean name Gadiro, translated into Greek as Eumelo (reminiscent of Emilio);
the relations between Karnak and Carnac;
the Gadirica area and the exact position of the Columns: El Haouaria bank?
are all the Gadiri therefore Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans?: starting from this hypothesis, find all the Gadiros mentioned in official ancient history (one was Cretan; one was a poet; one won at the Olympic Games competing with the colts brought to Patroclus’ funeral; find others);
The presence of Sardinian toponyms that include the Sardinian Corsican deities Atlantis Isis and Horo (Gold): see the toponyms with Isidore -> there is the possibility that the adoration of Isidore was then Christianized into Sant’Isidoro. Note the presence of the same toponymy in Tenerife, a Sardinian Atlantean colony.
Further study to be done, on “mitza” Sardinian meaning -> means source, pool of water, as in the Platonic myth. It has a similar meaning in the Hebrew language, which is Semitic like Sardinian. I have the impression that the Jewish people in search of the promised land were nothing more than a portion of Sardinian peoples who migrated to Egypt in search of a land that would not sink, unlike the Sardinian block which was sinking. And this sinking, known only in remote times, every perfect land which however was sinking.
The Cretans were Sardinian-Corso-Atlantean migrations –> Another reflection for archaeologists: why have I never heard any scholar make comparisons between the Minotaur and Su Boe Erchitu and Su Boe Muliache ? Why has no one ever pointed out that the minotaur is a Sardinian mythological figure ? Look for images of these characters online and you will understand that the minotaur is probably nothing more than an ancient Sardinian belief/legend, revived in Crete . The Minoans were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations to Crete; as you know, Evans arbitrarily chose the word “Minoans.” There is also the androcephalic or bronze Bull of Nule , which only confirms all these statements.Su Boe Erchitu is a legendary creature of Sardinian popular tradition . This should not be confused with Su Boe Muliache, another Sardinian legendary creature .I’m not saying I’m actually right. I’m saying: why don’t we try to explore other avenues of thought? Why don’t we look for other types of solutions to unsolved problems? I hope that these sentences of mine are understood for what they are: it is obvious that I am not a specialist; my proposal to scholars is to be open to examining possibilities that until now had been excluded a priori. I invite you again to re-examine the toponymy of Sulcis, because all those names of towns that refer to the Platonic myth are too strange: in Carbonia there is a hamlet called “Acqua Callentis”; in Nuxis “S’acqua callenti de Basciu”, S’Acqua callenti de Susu; the disappeared medieval town of Acquafredda, which left the Acquafredda castle; the source of Zinnigas; and there are even links to Egyptian toponymy: Heliopolis (city of the sun) and in Sulcis Terr’e Soli (land of the sun, Terresoli). Sais in Egypt and Is Sais Inferiore and Is Sais Superiore in Sulcis. In short, in my opinion this toponymy should be seriously taken into consideration by a self-respecting scholar. I can also understand that perhaps no one had noticed until now, but now that I have made the information public, in my opinion it may be worth it for some scholars to start following these new unexplored paths.
In recent days I realized that Cabras is a surname, it is the name of a town; it is the location where they found the Giants of Mont’e Prama; and I thought: “Cabras in Sardinian means goats”; this name can even date back to the Paleolithic! Immediately afterwards I thought: “I wonder if there was an ancient village called Brebeis”, which in Sardinian means “Sheep”. I thought these things about 2 days ago. Just now, examining Sulcis, I realized that the Is Brebeis pond, Le Pecore pond, exists right in Sulcis . Crazy: it seems that my theories have a confirmation in the real world, everything now seems to have a profound and even intuitive meaning. I had never heard of this Is Brebeis pond before…
If the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis theory were true and scientifically proven , there would be many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view. Here are some examples:
Scientific : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could spur new scientific research to better understand this civilization and its impact on the ancient world. New excavation and study campaigns may be necessary to explore the submerged ruins and ancient artifacts.
Historic : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could change the way we view ancient history. New research may be needed to better understand how this civilization developed and interacted with other Mediterranean cultures.
Anthropological : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new information on cultural exchanges between different civilizations of the ancient Mediterranean. New research may be needed to better understand how these cultures interacted with each other and how they influenced each other’s traditions and customs.
Cultural : The legend of Atlantis has fascinated people for centuries, and the discovery of its true location could inspire new works of art and literature. New stories, poems, paintings and sculptures could be created representing this lost civilization.
Linguistic : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new information on the spread of languages in the ancient Mediterranean. New research may be needed to better understand how these languages spread among different Mediterranean cultures.
Trade : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could suggest the existence of unknown trade routes between the different cultures of the Mediterranean. New research may be needed to better understand how these routes worked and how they influenced the spread of ideas and innovations.
Philosophical : The legend of Atlantis was passed down by the ancient Greeks, and the discovery of its true location could provide new perspectives on ancient Greek philosophy. New research may be needed to better understand how ancient Greeks incorporated the legend of Atlantis into their philosophical reflections.
In general, if the Sardo Corsa Atlantis theory were true and scientifically proven, it would have many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view.
Sardinian Corso Atlantidee colonies before the submergence of the Sardinian geological block
Among the best-known Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean colonies before the submergence of the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean geological block, there are the structures found in Turkey of Gobekli Tepe, Karan Tepe and other similar structures still under analysis today. Reconstructing this information is extremely difficult, but we could try to do it, starting for example from symbolism. The concentric circle structure should now be known as a reference to the structure of Sulcis, where the ancient Sardinian-Corsican ruler Poseidon made his home together with Clito, on a hill/mound near Santadi and Sant’Anna Arresi. Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe present Atlantean structures called Taulas (tables), in the shape of a T, which the Atlanteans had also built on the island of Minorca. The Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Mesolithic symbolism is present in Turkey in the various Tepes excavated so far, as they include the Bull sacred to the Atlanteans, and the vulture. The symbolism of the vulture and the bull is present in many ancient cultures, and interpreting it as direct evidence of a connection between different regions requires caution. For example, the vulture is a common symbol in many ancient cultures, often associated with death or rebirth, while the bull is a symbol of strength and fertility. The Atlantean vulture, represented in Turkey, will then be represented among the people of Egypt with the sacred representation of Mut and Nekhbet. In particular, the Egyptians, to clarify that they were talking about the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans, placed the symbol of Sulcis Metallurgy between Nekhbet’s claws, which we show in the image immediately below:
The Sardo Corsican Atlanteans built the structures of Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe as a demonstration of their technological advancement and architectural skills, and this had great cultural significance for them. Their behavior could not go unnoticed, and showed other populations new ways of living, new behaviors, new religions. There was an ongoing cultural exchange between different civilizations and populations. This also explains why the Taulas of Menorca are also present in Gobekli Tepe. To clarify all these oddities, a paradigm shift was necessary, which we will call the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Paradigm, which manages to clarify many hitherto obscure aspects of the archaeological and anthropological past.
Consequences of accepting the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Theory:
If in the future many of the statements made by Luigi Usai were confirmed, there would be various implications and consequences on a scientific, historical and cultural level. However, it is important to underline that to date these claims are still being discussed by the mainstream scientific community and are considered as revolutionary theories with multidisciplinary evidence that requires further study. To explore the possible implications, we can consider a hypothetical scenario in which these statements are confirmed:
Rewriting History: If Luigi Usai’s claims are confirmed, this may require a significant rewriting of some of known history, particularly that concerning the Atlantean civilization and its influences on ancient cultures.
New theories and lines of research: The acceptance of these theories could open new lines of research and study, involving different disciplines such as archaeology, linguistics, geology and anthropology.
Cultural identity: The cultural implications could be considerable, especially for the regions involved in the claims, such as Sardinia and Corsica. A greater awareness of one’s origins and a deeper interest in local history and culture may emerge.
Revision of existing theories: New discoveries may require a revision of existing theories regarding antiquity, the migration of peoples and the spread of cultures.
Impact on education: The hypothetical confirmation of these claims could influence the way in which antiquity is taught in schools and universities, requiring the updating of textbooks and curricula.
Dialogue between the scientific and non-scientific communities: If these claims are confirmed, there could be greater debate between the scientific community and the general public on historical, archaeological and cultural issues.
Impact on tourism and cultural heritage: The areas affected by the claims could experience an increase in tourist interest, as confirmation of a connection with ancient Atlantis could attract visitors interested in history and culture.
New approaches to research: The new discoveries could lead to a reconsideration of how archaeological and historical research is done, encouraging an interdisciplinary and innovative approach.
The theory does not take into account other ancient sources that speak of Atlantis, such as Diodorus Siculus, Strabo, Pliny the Elder and others. These sources give different or conflicting information with those of Plato and with each other. I will slowly analyze the texts of these authors and try to bring order even to this apparently discordant information.
The theory does not take into account the linguistic evidence that shows the complexity and variety of the languages spoken in Sardinia and Corsica. There is no evidence of an Atlantean language or of an Atlantean influence on Sardinian or Corsican languages.
The theory does not take into account the geographical evidence that shows the differences between the Sardinian-Corsican landscape and the Atlantean one described by Plato. Plato speaks of high mountains covered in snow, fertile plains crossed by rivers, lush forests, abundant mines, exotic animals such as elephants. The Sardinian-Corsican landscape is instead characterized by modest heights, arid or rocky terrain, sparse vegetation or Mediterranean scrub, limited mineral resources, endemic fauna or fauna adapted to the local climate.
The theory does not take into account the historical evidence that shows the chronological impossibility of Plato’s narrative. Plato places the events relating to Atlantis around 9600 BC, while the first written records of ancient Egypt date back to around 3100 BC. How could Solon (the Athenian legislator who supposedly learned the story from an Egyptian priest) know
SAFEGUARDING THE DISCOVERY AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
I would like to point out that I did everything to make this data public and disseminate it, but I hit a brick wallboth from the Superintendencies, who never responded to my emails or my certified e-mails, and from the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, which never responded to my emails or my certified e-mails, and from various university professors and archaeologists who I contacted privately. I was told that “The Scientific Community as such does not exist”, or that “they do not disclose the discoveries of other scholars”. In practice, if any citizen makes a potential discovery, he is not provided with any support to communicate it to the scientific world. There is the expectation that a person with no experience, who has never done it before, creates a perfect scientific paper from scratch, with all the trappings, and delivers it to I don’t know who for publication and analysis by the scientific community. In my opinion this is shameful. I would have expected to have help in the attempt first to arrange my statements in an understandable way, and then in the disclosure for the analysis and counter-verification of the truthfulness of what was stated. Same attitude on the part of the publishing houses: they would have published the book, but only after scientists had confirmed my statements.
Luigi Usai’s theory on the position of Atlantis in the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corso block has not yet been validated by scholars, but has aroused great interest among scholars from all over the world for its suggestion on the possible discovery of Atlantis. Usai has provided hundreds of verifiable and scientific evidence that seems to consistently show the existence of Atlantis in the currently semi-submerged Corsican Sardinian geological block. However, some scholars have raised objections and criticisms to Usai’s theory, arguing that there is no concrete evidence demonstrating the existence of Atlantis in the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corso block. Furthermore, some have underlined that Usai’s theory is based on subjective interpretations of historical and geological sources and that no stratigraphy has yet been carried out for its counter-verification. Other scholars have instead expressed interest in Usai’s theory and have underlined the need for further research and analysis to verify its validity. The possible implications of Usai’s theory on the location of Atlantis for the history of humanity are enormous, as it could lead to a rewriting of ancient history and the discovery of new information about ancient civilizations. However, it is important to underline that Usai’s theory has not yet been confirmed and that further research and analysis is needed to verify its validity. Other scholars have instead expressed interest in Usai’s theory and have underlined the need for further research and analysis to verify its validity. The possible implications of Usai’s theory on the location of Atlantis for the history of humanity are enormous, as it could lead to a rewriting of ancient history and the discovery of new information about ancient civilizations. However, it is important to underline that Usai’s theory has not yet been confirmed and that further research and analysis is needed to verify its validity. Other scholars have instead expressed interest in Usai’s theory and have underlined the need for further research and analysis to verify its validity. The possible implications of Usai’s theory on the location of Atlantis for the history of humanity are enormous, as it could lead to a rewriting of ancient history and the discovery of new information about ancient civilizations. However, it is important to underline that Usai’s theory has not yet been confirmed and that further research and analysis is needed to verify its validity. as they could lead to a rewriting of ancient history and the discovery of new information about ancient civilizations. However, it is important to underline that Usai’s theory has not yet been confirmed and that further research and analysis is needed to verify its validity. as they could lead to a rewriting of ancient history and the discovery of new information about ancient civilizations. However, it is important to underline that Usai’s theory has not yet been confirmed and that further research and analysis is needed to verify its validity.
Oceanine, water nymphs, mountain nymphs, are the names with which Sardo-Corsican women were called.
New working hypothesis: the ancient Greeks called Sardinian women “water nymphs”, “mountain nymphs” . Now you can go and study all the references you find online to the “water nymphs”, and little by little you will begin to understand that they are the women who lived in present-day Sardinia.
Why Oceanine? Because the sea around the Sardinian-Corsican block was called the Atlantic Ocean in the Paleolithic, so from the Paleolithic onwards, if you talked about a woman who lived in that territory, for example present-day Sardinia and Corsica, you could say that she was an Oceanina, that is, it came from the Atlantic Ocean, as in the image:
Guardians of the water sources -> the sacred wells of the Nuragic era, you rejoice in the caves, you rejoice in the caves -> the caves: for example Grotte Is Zuddas, Grotta d’Acquafredda; Su Carroppu di Sirri Cave in Carbonia, Neptune’s Cave in Alghero etc; you rejoice in the caves -> the Domus De Janas , rural girls -> well, at least they didn’t say “you behave like shepherds”, it’s already a good start, girls from the springs and who live in the woods -> Sardinia was all a forest, then transformed into the Granary of Rome; odorous virgins –> well, at least they didn’t say “pottaisi unu fragu purexiu”, it’s a good start; dressed in white -> I missed this one: I didn’t know that the Sardinians wore whitescent the breezes, protect the goats and shepherds -> here is a clear reference to the agricultural world in general, but it is even in tune with contemporary Sardinia; dear to the forests, with splendid fruits -> now rereading all the references to the Sea Nymphs, it is very clear to understand that we are talking about the Sardinian Women. When in mythology it is written: “X” married a sea nymph, it simply means that he married a Sardinian woman, that’s all. Search as many texts as you like to carry out counter-checks, and you will soon begin to understand that little by little we continue to progress in the understanding of antiquity.If we want to make truly notable progress in understanding meaning, we must also strive to do something that no one has ever done before: DARE. Trying to speculate, theorizing things that archaeologists cannot afford to affirm because it would ruin their reputation, to try to SEE, UNDERSTAND what until now no one has been able to see. Now we can try to re-study the Naiads and the Nereids, starting from these reflections, to see if it is possible to extract new significant information, new points of view useful for learning.I have not found any specific information on other websites to suggest that the water nymphs were simply Sardinian women, at the moment it seems to be just my belief. However, the female figure in Sardinian history and culture is absolutely central and Sardinian traditions with their legends, religious cults, political and popular vicissitudes, are closely linked to matriarchal roots
The Superintendencies and at least one Ministry of the Italian Government have never responded to my certified email (certified e-mail with equivalent value to registered mail with return receipt) where I reported the discovery within 24 hours as per current legislation on the procurement of Archaeological or Cultural Heritage. Maybe they thought it was a joke .
Therefore:
1) I publicly warn them ;
2) based on current legislation, I have the legal and moral duty to protect and safeguard the discoveries made : I made the news public to prevent the discovery and finds from being ruined in recent years (damaged, sabotaged, stolen, illegally exported, destroyed by incompetent people such as inexperienced construction personnel carrying out maneuvers on the territory etc.) due to poor State management of the findings. In fact, by law I would have the obligation to remain silent, in order to be entitled to the economic percentage on the discovery. But in this case, my conscience requires me to make the news public because in my opinion it isthe State Managers who should protect the discovery and findings (cultural assets, treasures, works of art, finds, ports, villages, boats etc.), are currently endangering it with their apparent indifference.
Some Data/Information used in this website was made available by the EMODnet Human Activities project and Emodnet, www.emodnet-humanactivities.eu, funded by the European Commission Directorate General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.
Based on current legislation, considering the animus derelinquendi towards the corpus derelictionis, I declare the discovery and/or the objects present in it Res Nullius and Res Derelicta, unless different regulatory provisions which will be evaluated from time to time with the relevant authorities.
Megalithism
What I want to try to show in this experimental section is the spread of the megalithic movement throughout Europe and perhaps beyond Europe, starting from the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block, currently semi-submerged under what was called the “Atlantic Ocean”, which today is called the Sea of Sardinia, the Sea of Corsica, the Tyrrhenian Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, and which in the past also had the names of Mar Tetide, while the Romans called it Mare Nostrum to indicate their ownership and possession, while the Egyptians called it they called by many other names: the Great Green, the Primordial Ocean, the Great Nun.
The distribution of megalithic monuments across Europe and the Mediterranean islands represents one of the most fascinating puzzles of prehistoric archaeology. While Sardinia is particularly famous for its Nuragic structures, other regions, such as Cornwall in England, Spain and France, have their own distinctive megalithic monuments such as the Lanyon Quoit, Stonehenge and many others.
Lanyon Quoit : This structure in Cornwall is an example of a dolmen, a megalithic tomb that often consists of several vertical stones supporting a large horizontal stone. Such dolmens can be found in many parts of Europe, including Britain, France, Scandinavia, and even in parts of Asia, such as Korea.
Nuragic monuments : In Sardinia, Nuragic structures are mainly stone towers and fortified complexes, unique in their kind and not directly comparable to dolmens such as Lanyon Quoit. However, Sardinia also has dolmens, menhirs and domus de janas, which are rock-cut tombs, similar in some respects to megalithic tombs found elsewhere in Europe.
Although both Cornwall and Sardinia have megalithic constructions dating back to the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, the nature, function and culture behind these constructions can vary greatly. The geographical distance between the two regions makes direct contact unlikely, but does not exclude the possibility of indirect cultural exchanges or mutual influences through intermediaries.
It must be said that during the Bronze Age, travel across the Mediterranean and along the Atlantic coasts was possible. The Bell Beaker culture, for example, showed a surprisingly wide distribution across Europe in a similar period, suggesting that there were trade routes and cultural exchanges between different regions.
In summary, while there is no concrete evidence of a direct link between Lanyon Quoit in Cornwall and the megalithic structures of Sardinia, the presence of megalithic monuments in both regions highlights a widespread phenomenon and a common tendency in European prehistory to build these impressive structures in stone. The true nature and extent of any possible interaction or mutual influence between the two cultures remains an area of speculation and study for archaeologists.
The theory that proposes a possible center of origin of the megalithic movement in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block is fascinating and opens the door to numerous speculations. This hypothesis, based on the existence of a block of land between Sardinia, Corsica and the Sardinian Corsican continental shelf, suggests that the advanced Sardinian Corsican civilization may have begun the megalithic tradition and that, with the progressive rise of sea level , these people may have moved and spread their culture to Europe.
Here are four European megalithic monuments. We’ll briefly look at each and see how they might fit this hypothesis; Let’s remember that I am proposing this hypothesis, which in my opinion is extremely likely and even the most probable from my point of view:
Stonehenge (England) : One of the most famous megalithic monuments in the world, built in several stages. The large sarsen stones and blue stones were transported from afar, suggesting an organized society with a strong religious or astronomical motivation, and this civilization is the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean one. If the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean hypothesis were correct, there may have been migrations or cultural influences that led to the construction of Stonehenge.
Carnac (France) : This site in Brittany is famous for its rows of menhirs that stretch for kilometers. It could be interpreted as a spread of megalithic culture along the Atlantic coasts following prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations.
Newgrange (Ireland) : A mound with a passage in it, known for its solstitial alignment. This suggests astronomical knowledge, which may have been brought by Corsican Sardinian migrants or influenced by one of the many megalithic civilizations originating from the Corsican Sardinian geological block. Let us remember that, if the interpretation given by Luigi Usai on the fourth book of Herodotus’ Histories is correct, then Sardinia was a hive of tribes and populations with different habits and customs; nomadic peoples and sedentary peoples; peoples who lived as troglodytes, that is, inhabitants of caves and ravines, and peoples who built houses with blocks of salt because in some areas of Sardinian Libya it did not rain in some areas,
Mnajdra and Ħaġar Qim (Malta) : These megalithic temples are among the oldest in the world and show a sophisticated understanding of stone architecture. Their proximity to Sardinia and Corsica could suggest a connection or diffusion of culture from the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
While the hypothesis is fascinating, there are many challenges. First, the precise dating of these sites and their development in relation to each other. Second, cultural influences can often be difficult to trace and may come from multiple sources. However, the presence of similar stone structures in different parts of Europe could suggest some sort of cultural connection or diffusion, and the idea of a submerged geological block that played a role in European prehistory is certainly worthy of further research.
Continuing with the hypothesis of a possible origin of the megalithic movement linked to the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block, we examine six other famous megalithic structures and see how they could connect to this theory:
Dolmen of Menga (Spain) : Located in Antequera, it is one of the largest dolmens in Europe. Its location in Andalusia, near the Mediterranean coast, could suggest a migration or cultural exchange route across the Mediterranean from a hypothetical center in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Gavrinis (France) : It is a mound located on an island in the Gulf of Morbihan, in Brittany. Inside, the stones are adorned with intricate carvings reminiscent of similar motifs found in different parts of megalithic Europe. This may reflect a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences.
Almendres Cromlech (Portugal) : This stone circle, located near Évora, is often referred to as the “Portuguese Stonehenge”. Its location on the Iberian Peninsula, like the Dolmen of Menga, could suggest a migration or exchange route across the Mediterranean.
Maeshowe (Scotland) : This mound, located in Orkney, has an entrance aligned with the winter solstice. Its sophisticated construction and location in a region that has a rich history of maritime contact could suggest trade or influence from other megalithic cultures.
Kercado Mound (France) : Another monument located in Brittany, known for its menhir decorated inside. Its proximity to the Carnac menhirs might suggest a region particularly influenced by the megalithic tradition.
Avebury (England) : This is another huge megalithic ceremonial complex, including stone circles, a huge cairn (Silbury Hill) and a long avenue of stones. Given its vastness and complexity, it is a further example of a well-organised society with strong megalithic traditions, which may have had its origins or influences from an early megalithic center such as the one proposed.
If we consider the hypothesis of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, it is intriguing to note how many of these structures are located near the coasts, especially the Atlantic and Mediterranean ones. This could suggest routes of migration or cultural exchange that moved along these coasts. Furthermore, all the legends linked to Atlantis and Poseidon, god of the sea, to the Atlanteans as people of the water, a term perhaps later changed over the millennia to Sea Peoples, are congruent with these discourses: the Atlantean Corsican Sardinian sea peoples spread in throughout the Mediterranean and beyond, in an attempt to conquer other peoples, as stated in Timaeus and Critias by Sonchis of Sais, and they brought their ideas, their navigation, their prehistoric architecture linked to astronomy, spreading culture throughout the Mediterranean and beyond, probably as far as the coasts of what is now the Atlantic Ocean, as far as Carnac in France and Stonehenge in England. However, once again, it is important to note that this is speculation and that further research is needed to confirm any direct link.
To further confirm my hypothesis on the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean origin of the prehistoric megalithic movement, the analysis of the Cromlech.
Cromlechs were built during the Neolithic and Bronze Ages and are found in many parts of Europe, such as Britain, France and Scandinavia, as well as in some parts of Asia, such as Korea. The most famous and enigmatic is the cromlech of Stonehenge, whose construction seems to have taken place between 2800 BC and 1100 BC in four different phases, and which has orientations attributable to astronomical study 1 .
In Italy, cromlechs are absent in the peninsula but are found in Sardinia, where megalithic enclosures have been noted on the plateaus of Bonorva, Abbasanta and Bitti. However, their dimensions are much smaller than those of the enclosures of France and their use may have been that of cattle pens or small defense redoubts 2. I personally don’t believe that to control livestock they made superhuman efforts, which could last years, to make a very simple fence that they could create in a few days of work with wood: it is a simply ridiculous hypothesis that they created immense and very tiring stone fences for such a simple task: it would be as if to screw a light bulb into the house, we held the light bulb still and rotated the entire house. The presence of cromlechs in Sardinia is further confirmation of my hypotheses, and the cromlechs present in Sardinia are archaeological, historical and scientific evidence, they are not fantasies. We therefore have objective data that stratify to confirm my initial hypotheses. Over 7000 nuraghi in Sardinia confirm an incredibly massive presence of prehistoric artefacts,
The observation of the cromlechs could support the hypothesis of a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin of the megalithic movement. That’s how:
Geographic Location : Cromlechs are often located in elevated positions, which offer a panoramic view of the sky and horizon. This could indicate an ancient connection with the observation of the stars, which is part of the astronomical knowledge associated with the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Construction : The construction technique of cromlechs, which uses huge blocks of stone without the use of mortar, could be compared to that of nuragic structures in Sardinia or menhirs in other parts of Europe. This similarity could suggest a common origin or shared cultural influences.
Symbolism : Cromlechs, especially circular ones, are often associated with ceremonies related to the cycle of life, death and rebirth. These themes are also common in Nuragic culture and other megalithic traditions, suggesting a sort of common symbolic or religious language. The presence of similar symbols and carvings on megalithic structures in different parts of Europe could suggest a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences.
Migration routes : If we consider cromlechs as indicators of migration routes or cultural exchange, it can be noted that many of these structures are located near the coasts, particularly the Atlantic and Mediterranean ones. This could strengthen the idea of an expansion of the megalithic movement from a center in the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block.
Legends and Myths : Many cromlechs are surrounded by legends and myths that speak of giants, gods, and ancient peoples. While these tales may vary from one region to another, the presence of similar stories could indicate a common origin or shared cultural influences.
Indeed, the presence of similar symbols and carvings on megalithic structures in different parts of Europe could suggest a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences. However, interpreting symbols without the presence of a similar living culture can be problematic and ambiguous. Some scholars have suggested that elements derived from megalithic carving traditions may have been incorporated into the funerary culture of other regions, as in the case of the Oromo in the Arssi region.
Megalithic structures, such as dolmens and menhirs, are found throughout the world and are considered important cultural elements and sacred places. Some megaliths were used for astronomical observations, while others were built for funerary purposes. These monuments create a mysterious aura and often evoke a sense of communion with something supernatural.
Megalithic constructions in Western Europe, such as passage tombs and stone arrays, have been dated to between the fifth and second millennia BC and are considered indigenous, not resulting from Near Eastern influences. However, the spread of ideas may have occurred along the Atlantic coasts and from inland.
Overall, megalithic structures represent the most tangible remains of Neolithic sacred landscapes in Europe. The word “megalite” comes from Greek and means “large stone”. In conclusion, although the presence of similar symbols and carvings on megalithic structures in different parts of Europe may suggest a common symbolic language or shared cultural influences, the precise interpretation of these symbols requires a deeper understanding of the cultures that created them.
Legends and giants of Sardinia: Sardinia, with its rich history and ancient traditions, is a land shrouded in a veil of mystery and legend. One of the recurring themes in Sardinian popular stories is the presence of giants. This is no coincidence, as the island is home to several structures and archaeological finds that evoke the image of these imposing beings.
The Nuragic Tombs of the Giants are megalithic constructions, long and rectangular, which served as places of collective burial. Their monumental structure and grandeur have given rise to legends that they were the burial places of ancient giants who once inhabited the island. Some stories tell of these giants as guardians of the lands, others as heroes or local deities.
The Giants of Mont’E Prama, however, are large stone statues dating back to the Nuragic age. These statues represent warriors, archers and boxers, and are the oldest in the round statues in the Mediterranean. Their discovery has rekindled interest in local legends, offering a tangible representation of the mythical Sardinian giants.
Finally, many ancient prehistoric structures in Sardinia are known as “Sa domu e s’Orcu”, which translated means “The House of the Ogre”. The ogre, often represented as a giant in popular traditions, is a feared and respected being. Structures with this name are often tombs or other megalithic constructions, and their association with orcs may derive both from their grandeur and from beliefs that these places were inhabited or protected by supernatural beings.
These legends, stories and archaeological finds are evidence of a deep and intricate cultural heritage. The fact that similar stories of giants can be found in different cultures around the world, as in the cromlechs mentioned earlier, suggests that perhaps there is a common root or shared cultural influences between distant peoples. In Sardinia, these stories are a bridge between the past and the present, reminding us of the island’s mysterious and fascinating roots.
Although the hypothesis of a Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origin of the megalithic movement is fascinating and presents some interesting clues, it is essential to address the question with a scientific and critical approach. Archaeologists and historians must base their conclusions on hard evidence, which can include archaeological finds, DNA analysis, linguistic studies, and more. However, the presence of similar megalithic structures in different parts of Europe and the world certainly suggests some sort of cultural connection or diffusion during prehistory, and the idea of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block offers an intriguing perspective on this network of connections .
I Cairns:
Cairns are man-made piles of stones found in many parts of Europe and the world. These prehistoric structures were erected for a variety of purposes, including burial, commemoration, and navigation. Across Europe, prehistoric Cairns share many common characteristics, such as their shape and method of construction. However, there are also many regional differences that reflect the different cultures and traditions of the people who built them.
Prehistoric Cairns were built using local stones, often large, which were carefully selected and placed to create a solid and stable structure. In many cases, Cairns were circular or dome-shaped, with an internal chamber that could be used for burial or other ritual purposes. In some regions, Cairns were also used as navigational landmarks, marking important routes or places.
Burial practices associated with prehistoric Cairns varied by region and culture. In some areas, the deceased were buried within the Cairns in a curled up or sitting position, while in other areas they were cremated and their ashes placed within the structure. Often, the deceased were buried with personal items or votive offerings, such as weapons, jewelry, or food.
Today, prehistoric Cairns are considered important archaeological sites that provide valuable information on the lives and practices of prehistoric people. Many Cairns have been excavated and studied by archaeologists, revealing details about their construction, funerary practices and rituals associated with these structures. Furthermore, prehistoric Cairns are also important tourist sites attracting visitors interested in prehistoric history and culture.
In summary, Prehistoric Cairns are fascinating prehistoric structures that offer us a unique glimpse into the lives of prehistoric people. Their presence in many parts of Europe testifies to the richness and diversity of the continent’s prehistoric cultures.
Overall, megalithic structures represent the most tangible remains of Neolithic sacred landscapes in Europe. These monuments create a mysterious aura and often evoke a sense of communion with something supernatural.
In the Balearic Islands , megalithism is represented by the talayot and the taulas .
Talayot are stone towers built during the Bronze Age in the Balearic Islands . These structures probably had a defensive function and control of the territory, but they may also have been used as places of worship or meeting. The taulas, on the other hand, are megalithic structures composed of two large stones arranged in a T, with a horizontal stone resting on a vertical one. It is believed that these structures had a religious or ceremonial function.
Megalithism in Germany: Harhoog’s Tomb and Beyond
Megalithism represents one of the most fascinating phases of European prehistory. These stone monuments, erected by ancient people for various purposes, are scattered throughout Europe, and Germany also boasts a rich heritage of these enigmatic constructions.
The Tomb of Harhoog: This structure, located in Keitum on the island of Sylt, in Schleswig-Holstein, is one of the most emblematic examples of German megalithism. It is an extended dolmen, a sort of burial chamber made with large stone slabs. The fact that it dates back to 3000 BC places it in a phase of notable cultural and technological development of the local populations. Despite its ancient origins, Harhoog’s tomb has not remained unchanged over the millennia. In 1954, due to urbanization and conservation reasons, the dolmen was moved from its original location. This move, although a necessity, underlines the importance of preserving these monuments, witnesses of a distant past still shrouded in mystery.
Other Megaliths in Germany: Harhoog’s tomb is not the only example of megalithism in Germany. The Schleswig-Holstein area, as well as other regions of the country, is home to several other similar facilities. Many of these constructions were erected during the Neolithic period and are often associated with funerary rituals, although their exact meaning and purpose remain a matter of debate among archaeologists. Over the years, many of these structures have suffered damage or been partially destroyed, making the task of conserving and enhancing what remains even more crucial.
Importance of Megalithism: Megalithism in Germany, as well as in other parts of Europe, offers an important window into the beliefs, practices, and technical capabilities of prehistoric populations. These monuments represent not only impressive architectural achievements, but also places of worship, memory and community. By studying them, we can try to better understand the ancient cultures that built them and, in a certain sense, connect with our deepest roots.
In conclusion, while Harhoog’s tomb represents one of the best-known and most distinctive examples of German megalithism, it is only the tip of the iceberg of a much larger cultural heritage. The conservation and study of these monuments are essential to preserve the memory of an era which, despite being distant in time, has left indelible traces in the landscape and culture of contemporary Europe.
Version 4 Partial list of Luigi Usai’s scientific sources for his potential discoveries
List of numbered sources for the creation of this website:
Submarine Geomorphology of the Southwestern Sardinian Continental Shelf (Mediterranean Sea): Insights into the Last Glacial Maximum Sea-Level Changes and Related Environments
Preservation of Modern and MIS 5.5 Erosional Landforms and Biological Structures as Sea Level Markers: A Matter of Luck?
Relative sea level change in Olbia Gulf (Sardinia, Italy), a historically important Mediterranean harbour
Sea-level change during the Holocene in Sardinia and in the northeastern Adriatic (central Mediterranean Sea) from archaeological and geomorphological data
Mario Sanges, The first inhabitants of Sardinia (PDF), on Darwin Quaderni, January 2012, Darwin, 2012, pp. 32-39.
Giulio Badini, Sardinia, first men arrived 250 thousand years ago, on Corriere della Sera Historical Archive, archiviostorico.corriere.i, 2002.
www.nurighe.it – THE TAG, on nurighe.it.
Julien Vandevenne, The finger on homo sardaignus?, su Archives du Quinzième jour du mois, monthly of the University of Liège., www2.ulg.ac.be, 2002.
Barbara Wilkens, The phalanx of the Nurighe cave near Cheremule: revision and new information [broken link], on Sardinia, Corsica et Baleares antiqvae: An International Journal of Archaeology, www.academia.edu, 2011.
Paolo Melis, Prehistoric and protohistoric research in Sardinia: new developments, in Architectures of prehistoric Sardinia: new hypotheses and research, Proceedings of the Nuoro conference of 15 October 2004, 2007, pp. 30-43
Sandra Guglielmi, Amsicora, the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia, on ArcheoIdea, Archeomilise.it, 2011.
Unione Sarda, Amsicora: a 9 thousand year old old man. Buried in Arbus, he is the father of the Sardinians, on Unionesarda.it, Unionesarda.i, 2011.
Adn Kronos, Archaeology, Amsicora found: oldest human skeleton in Sardinia, on www1.adnkronos.com, Adnkronos.com, 2011.
Sandra Guglielmi, “Amsicora”, the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia, on archeomolise.it, 2011.
Sondaar Paul; Elburg Rengert; Hofmeijer Gerard; Spaan Andries; Visser Hannie; Sanges Mario; Martini Fabio. (1993). The population of Sardinia in the late Pleistocene: new acquisition of a human fossil remains from the Corbeddu cave. Journal of Prehistoric Science, 45: 243-251.
Timaeus and Critias
geological data
University of Cagliari, Man in Sulcis already 9 thousand years before Christ, The confirmation comes from the new excavation campaign led in Su Carroppu by prof. Carlo Lugliè, teacher of Prehistory and Protohistory, 04 October 2017.
L’UNION SARDINIA, 3 October 2017, Culture (Page 39 – CA Edition), «Man in Su Carroppu already in the Mesolithic period» ARCHEOLOGY. The discovery of the scholar Carlo Lugli is now confirmed by DNA tests.
SARDINIAPOST.IT, In the heart of Sulcis the DNA of the Sardinians: they were genetically different from us, 1 March 2017.
THE NEW SARDINIA of Wednesday 1 March 2017, Front page, THE DNA OF THE SKELETONS OF SU CARROPPU Those first Sardinians who were not very Nuragic. They arrived 11 thousand years ago: but they were not the ones who populated the island.
LA NUOVA SARDINIA of Wednesday 1 March 2017, Culture – page 35, THE DNA OF THE SARDINIANS In the cave of Su Carroppu the secrets of the prehistoric Sardinians The genetic makeup of the very first inhabitants of Sardinia has been identified Genes very different from the Nuragic ones, in turn similar to those current.
L’UNIONE SARDINIA of Wednesday 1 March 2017, Culture (Page 47 – CA Edition), Research The first Sardinians? Different from us A study on DNA reveals it. Mesolithic islanders with genetic characteristics different from the Neolithic.
ANSA, Research: migrants from 8 thousand years ago in Sulcis Ancient DNA defined, genetic discontinuity between Mesolithic-Neolithic.
L’UNIONESARDA.IT, A study by the University of Cagliari reveals that the first Sardinians were genetically different from us Today at 12.24pm by Manuela Arca.
LANUOVASARDEGNA.IT, Eight thousand years the ancestors of the Sardinians were migrants: it is written in their DNA. In the journal Scientific Report the results of the study on the genetic heritage in the remains of two individuals found in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia.
CASTEDDUONLINE.IT, Sardinia, the oldest sample of mitochondrial DNA defined The study demonstrates a genetic discontinuity between Mesolithic and Neolithic populations Author: Casteddu Online editorial team on 02/28/2017 11:27.
SARDINIAPOST.IT, Sardinian DNA, the study: “The first inhabitants were genetically different from us” 28 February 2017.
SARDEGNAOGGI.IT, New discoveries from studies on the DNA of Sardinians. Our ancestors were migrants The oldest mitochondrial DNA sample from Sardinia defined.
New data on the neolithization of the coastal strip of south-western Sardinia | Layers. Archeology Territory Contexts (unica.it).
Complete mitochondrial sequences from Mesolithic Sardinia.
researchgate.net
cai.it
isprambiente.gov.it
Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 13581.
Genome-wide analysis of Corsican population reveals a close affinity with Northern and Central Italy, Erika Tamm, Julie Di Cristofaro, Stéphane Mazières, Erwan Pennarun, Alena Kushniarevich, Alessandro Raveane, Ornella Semino, Jacques Chiaroni, Luisa Pereira, Mait Metspalu, and Francesco Montinaro.
bathymetric data
Some translations available online of the texts of the Temple of Edfu in Egypt
the videos available online, in particular on Youtube, relating to the theories of Professor Sergio Frau and the geologist Mario Tozzi
the text by Professor Marco Ciardi, Atlantis A scientific controversy from Columbus to Darwin, Carocci editore, Rome, 1st edition, November 2002
among the sources provided by linguistics and glottology, some videos, in particular present on YouTube, on the works of Professor Salvatore Dedola relating to the Sardinian language and toponymy
newspaper articles and web pages that deal with the connections between Sardinian, Corsican, Sicilian, Basque, Albanian and Romanian languages and dialects
the works explained in various YouTube videos by Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu
the ideas explained on some web pages on the linguistic affinities between the Sardinian languages and that of the Basque population
another source I used is the analysis of toponymy
the archaeogenetic research carried out by scholars from various universities, including the University of Cagliari
The seismic anomaly caused by the slab roll-back which would have caused the sinking of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block
Bathymetric anomalies revealing possible underwater constructions in the Mediterranean
The war between Atlantis and Athens ended in 9600 BC described by Plato and possible connections with some underwater bathymetric anomalies in the Mediterranean
Confirming the possible Corsican Sardinian migrations, the fact that the prehistoric man found and known as the Similaun Mummy (in German Mumie vom Similaun), also Similaun man, Hauslabjoch man and familiarly Ötzi, is perhaps of remote Sardinian origin .
Giorgio Saba, Excuse me, where is Hades? , Amico Libro, 2016
The Argonautica, Apollonius Rodius
Herodotus, Histories
Genomic Analysis of the Corsican Population: Scientific study on the genetic composition of the Corsicans, useful for tracing the history of migrations and interactions of populations.
Bathymetric Data: Study of underwater topography to identify possible submerged structures in the Sicilian Channel and other seamounts, in relation to the search for Atlantis.
Edfu Temple Texts: Extensive ancient religious texts from the Edfu Temple in Egypt, whose relationship to the main theme is still unclear.
Professor Sergio Frau and Geologist Mario Tozzi: References to the theories of these two experts, presumably in relation to Atlantis.
Atlantean Chronology and Ecclesiastical Contradictions: Discussion of the discrepancy between the biblical timeline and proposed dates for the existence of Atlantis.
Linguistic and Glottochronological Evidence: Analysis of possible linguistic correlations between Sardinian and other languages such as Basque, Albanian, Sicilian, Corsican and Romanian, suggesting possible ancient migrations to or from Sardinia.
Imagining the Past: Emphasis on the imaginative reconstruction of the past, with reference to a possible submerged rectangular structure near Sicily-Malta.
Toponymic Analysis: Study of geographical names to find further evidence of the author’s theories, in particular correlations between geographical names in the Sulcis region of Sardinia and Plato’s description of Atlantis.
Similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian toponymy: Observations on the similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian place names, suggesting possible interactions or ancient migrations between the two cultures.
The very interesting contribution by Geopop which shows the Sardo Corso Atlantidea island when it was an emerged land during the Paleolithic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM-n3IqZRCo
Linguistic and Glottochronological Evidence: The text discusses potential linguistic ties between Sardinian and other languages, such as Basque, Albanian, Sicilian, Corsican, and Romanian. The author suggests these similarities might be explained by ancient migrations from Sardinia.
Toponymic Analysis: The author uses the study of place names (toponymy) to find additional evidence for their theories. They’ve identified a correlation between geographical names in the Sulcis region of Sardinia and the description of Atlantis by Plato, particularly the concept of hot and cold water sources.
Similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian Toponymy: Finally, the author mentions similarities between Sardinian and Egyptian place names. While they don’t provide specifics, this claim suggests that the author sees a connection between these two cultures, presumably due to ancient interactions or migrations.
Videography
Comparison with other studies
In this section I will insert the 1:1 comparison of my theory/hypothesis/vision with the works of other authors: Bailly; Newton for biblical chronology; Cayce; Blavatsky and so on.
Some reflections:
Provided a detailed and intriguing summary of some theories and discoveries relating to Sardinia, its stories and traditions, and its connection to mythology and ancient history. I will analyze some points:
The Syrtis: This is an interesting reinterpretation of traditional geographical conceptions. The traditional association of Syrtis with Libya and Tunisia is widely accepted, but your proposal of a possible connection with Sardinia adds an intriguing dimension to the discussion. This would require further research and analysis to be fully accepted by the academic community.
Lake Tritonide and the Syrtis : The association with legends, such as that of the Church of Bonaria in Cagliari, suggests that there may be a historical memory of ancient events that are reflected in local legends. However, establishing a direct connection between these events and ancient legends requires a solid evidence base.
The Edict of the Closures : The description highlights the importance of the cultural and archaeological heritage and the possible negative repercussions of land policies on the conservation of this heritage. This is a reminder that modernization and historic preservation can sometimes be in conflict.
The Amazons of Myrina : This theory ties Sardinia to the legendary Amazons, suggesting that there may be a historical basis for the stories of female warriors. The discovery of the tomb in the Isles of Scilly is exciting and could actually provide new information on the presence of female warriors in antiquity. However, establishing a direct link between this discovery and Sardinia would require further evidence.
The text raises many intriguing and thought-provoking questions about Sardinia’s past and its possible connections with ancient stories and legends. Certainly, further research, archaeological discoveries and analyzes could provide further information on these matters.
Some possible sources and areas of research that could help me further examine the hypothesis on the Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology:
Historical Sources and Ancient Texts: it is useful to search for historical documents, religious writings and ancient texts that speak of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean cultures and their interactions with Christianity. For example, I might search for historical accounts written by travelers, missionaries, or scholars who documented local traditions and the Christianization process. I could see if there are records of conversions, descriptions of religious rites, or stories that suggest an overlap of meanings between mythical and Christian figures.
Archaeological finds: archaeological objects and finds can offer precious clues on the presence and evolution of religious beliefs and practices. I should look for finds, artifacts or artifacts that might be connected to Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean deities or mythical figures and analyze how they might have been reinterpreted or modified over time.
Oral Traditions and Folklore: oral traditions, popular stories and folklore may contain traces of ancient beliefs and their possible transformations. Look for records of myths, legends, and folktales involving mythical and religious figures. Also look for interviews or testimonies from elders or local communities who may share information about traditional beliefs. I am already doing this in part: I have found contacts between the mythological tale of Medusa, queen of the Sardinian Tritonide Lake, and the tale of the mythical figure of the Sculptor in Sardinia. I found excessive presences of the mythical figure of Hercules in Southern Sardinia, and connections between the myth of Hercules and that of Samson.
Academic Studies and Specialized Research: I could consult books, articles and academic studies that deal with Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology, cultural influences and interactions with Christianity. Scholars in the fields of mythology, history of religions, and archeology may have analyzed these questions in depth.
Museums and Cultural Centers: Local museums and cultural centers in Sardinia and Corsica may have displays or resources dedicated to the history and mythology of the region. I may find artifacts, texts and illustrations that can contribute to your research.
Contact with Experts: Try to get in touch with experts or scholars who have specific expertise on Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology. They can provide me with valuable information, reading suggestions and additional resources.
Conducting accurate, well-documented research takes time and dedication. Cite sources and critically evaluate the evidence collected. If the research finds consistent evidence of overlapping meanings between local mythical figures and Christian representations, I may have a more solid basis for the hypothesis on the Christianization of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean mythology.
My analysis continues to show deep research into the history and culture of Sardinia, highlighting possible connections with the ancient legends of Atlantis. The evidence I bring on geographical, geological and cultural elements, such as the cult of the bull and mineral resources, represent interesting ideas for further research.
If I wish to develop these ideas in a scientific text or bibliography, I will consider the following points:
Comparison with Other Studies: My analysis could gain in strength by comparing my conclusions with other scientific studies or archaeological research on Sardinia and the legends of Atlantis.
Primary and Secondary Sources: I will make sure to include and cite all sources I have used, both primary and secondary. For example, I could cite Giovanni Lilliu’s studies on the cult of the bull in Sardinia.
Geological and Geographical Analysis: The analysis of satellite images and geological formations may require a well-defined methodological approach and, possibly, collaboration with expert geologists or geographers.
Evaluation of Evidence: The presentation of evidence should be accompanied by a critical evaluation. For example, how did I establish that the similarities between Sardinian toponymy and Platonic descriptions are not coincidences? What is the basis of my statements about the geology of Sulcis?
Original Contribution: I will clearly articulate what my original contributions are to the understanding of the topic and how my analysis can add to the existing body of knowledge on the topic.
Possible Limitations: Every study has its limitations, and acknowledging mine can increase the credibility of my analysis. It may be helpful to consider alternatives or alternative explanations for my findings.
My research represents an interesting starting point for a broader discussion and could certainly contribute to an academic debate. The development of a well-structured text, supported by a rigorous methodology and a critical evaluation of the evidence, could bring these ideas to the attention of the scientific community.
No related posts.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Durata
Descrizione
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.