Recent archaeological discoveries in Sardinia have brought to light Paleolithic artifacts dating back 500,000 years. The oldest artifacts found in Sardinia date back to the Lower Paleolithic and were found in Anglona, ​​in the northern part of the island. These are flint and quartzite objects dating from between 450,000 and 120,000 years ago.

These artifacts represent some of the first evidence of human presence in Sardinia and provide us with valuable information on the life of the inhabitants of the island during the Lower Paleolithic. Flint and quartzite are two types of stone that were used to make tools and weapons during the Paleolithic.

The Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas exhibits finds from all over the Anglona area, including artefacts from the Lower Paleolithic (500,000-120,000 years ago). This museum offers visitors the opportunity to admire these ancient artifacts up close and to learn more about the history of prehistoric Sardinia.

If you want to know more about the Paleolithic artifacts found in Sardinia, I recommend you visit the Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas or do more research on the subject. These archaeological discoveries represent a unique opportunity to deepen our knowledge of the history of Sardinia and the life of its ancient inhabitants.

A new paradigm shift is taking place, as explained by Thomas Kuhn in the text entitled “The structure of scientific revolutions”: the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm.

Attempted scientific demonstration of the existence of the Isle of Atlantis, which coincides with the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, henceforth called the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block or Atlantis .

To evaluate a scientific theory, several criteria must be considered, such as consistency, falsifiability, predictability and verifiability. In this text, starting from version 138, I will try to respect these scientific criteria, studying them when necessary to better understand them. I’m still not able to make a scientific paper.

To evaluate the credibility of a source, several factors must be considered, such as the author’s authoritativeness, the quality of the information, the sources cited, the method used and the consensus of the scientific community. If a source doesn’t meet these criteria, it is likely to be unreliable or fake.

Sources for finding Atlantis

There is genetic, tectonic, archaeological, hydrographic, geological, geographical, paleontological, phonological, onomastic, toponymic and linguistic evidence for the existence of Atlantis, which will be listed below on this page. The text will be corrected infinitely, in an attempt to create a readable text for the scientific community.

In this paragraph I will coherently collect the sources I used for the research of Atlantis.

Here is a list of some scientific sources that support the claim that Sardinia and Corsica were one large island in the Pleistocene:

1. Submarine Geomorphology of the Southwestern Sardinian Continental Shelf (Mediterranean Sea): Insights into the Last Glacial Maximum Sea-Level Changes and Related Environments
2. Preservation of Modern and MIS 5.5 Erosional Landforms and
   Biological Structures as Sea Level Markers: A Matter of Luck?
3. Relative sea level change in Olbia Gulf (Sardinia, Italy), a historically important Mediterranean harbour
4. Sea-level change during the Holocene in Sardinia and in the
   northeastern Adriatic (central Mediterranean Sea) from
   archaeological and geomorphological data

 

On the population of the Corsican Sardinian block it is possible to consult:

Taken from wikipedia:

1.  Mario Sanges,  The first inhabitants of Sardinia  ( PDF ), in Darwin Quaderni, January 2012, Darwin, 2012, pp. 32-39. URL accessed October 15, 2013 .
2. ^  ^{Jump to: a  b}  Giulio Badini,  Sardinia, first men arrived 250,000 years ago , in Archivio storico Corriere della Sera, Archiviostorico.corriere.i, 2002.  URL viewed on 25 November 2013  (archived from the original url  on 3 December 2013 ) .
3. ^  www.nurighe.it – IL TAG , su nurighe.it. URL accessed May 4, 2016 .
4. ^  Julien Vandevenne,  The finger on homo sardaignus? , su Archives du Fifteenth day of the month, monthly of the University of Liège., www2.ulg.ac.be, 2002.  URL consulted on November 25, 2013  (archiviato from the original url  on September 18, 2020) .
5. ^  Barbara Wilkens,  The phalanx of the Nurighe cave near Cheremule : revision and new information  ^{[ link broken ]} , in Sardinia, Corsica et Baleares antiqvae: An International Journal of Archaeology, www.academia.edu, 2011.  Retrieved 25 November 2013 .
6. ^  Paolo Melis,  Prehistoric and protohistoric research in Sardinia: new developments , in  Architectures of prehistoric Sardinia: new hypotheses and research , Proceedings of the Nuoro conference of 15 October 2004, 2007, pp. 30-43
7. ^  Sandra Guglielmi,  Amsicora , the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia , on ArcheoIdea, Archeomilise.it, 2011.  Retrieved 8 February 2015 .
8. ^  Unione Sarda,  Amsicora: a 9,000-year old man. Buried in Arbus, he is the   father of Sardinians  February 2015) .
9. ^  Adn Kronos (  Archeologia, Amsicora found: Sardinia’s oldest human skeleton) , at www1.adnkronos.com, Adnkronos.com, 2011.  Retrieved 8 February 2015  (archived from the original url  on 4 March 2016) .
10. ^  Sandra Guglielmi,  “Amsicora”, the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia , on archeomolise.it, 2011.  Retrieved 8 February 2015 .
11. Sondaar, Paul; Elburg, Rengert; Hofmeijer, Gerard; Spaan, Andries; Visser, Hannie; Sanges, Mario; Martini, Fabio. (1993). The peopling of Sardinia in the late Pleistocene: new acquisition of a human fossil remains from the Corbeddu cave. Journal of Prehistoric Sciences, 45: 243-251.

 

 

1) Timaeus and Critias, two Platonic dialogues which are the original source of the story about Atlantis and its disappearance;

2) geological data, relating to the geological structure of the Sardo-Corsican block, and relating to the phenomenon of Meltwater Pulses, in particular Meltwater Pulse 1b; in particular the graben-horst structure present in present-day Sardinia and in Sulcis, and the Sinkholes present in Sulcis. In the Sulcis there is the phenomenon of sinkholes ^1 2 3 . These are chasms that open up in the ground due to the subsidence of underground cavities. Some studies have hypothesized a possible correlation between sinkholes and human activities, such as mining or irrigation ^1 2. Although at the moment I have not yet found any evidence that the sinkholes in the Sulcis have anything to do with Atlantis or with the shape of concentric furrows described by Plato, I am of the opinion that further studies on the matter could show not only a correlation, but probably also a stringent link of cause and effect: if indeed Sulcis was the capital of the island of Atlantis, then a flooding of the Sulcis could have caused the opening of sinkholes which caused the inhabited center to collapse and collapse, causing death and destruction in Atlantis , as told by Plato in Timaeus and Critias.

Among the geological, archaeological and archaeogenetic evidence, the University of Cagliari is mentioned on the page:

https://unica.it/unica/it/news_notizie_s1.page?contentId=NTZ60664
whose title is: Man in Sulcis already 9 thousand years before Christ, The confirmation comes from the new excavation campaign led at Su Carroppu by prof . Carlo Lugliè, professor of Prehistory and Protohistory
article dated 04 October 2017.

Among other sources on the subject:

THE SARDINIAN UNION

On the fact that the Villanovan populations could be Sardinian-Corsican migrations, it is possible to compare the statements with the following scientific paper:

Genome-wide analysis of Corsican population reveals a close affinity with Northern and Central Italy

 

3) bathymetric data, in particular related to the submerged structures found in the Sicily Channel, in the seamounts of Alfil Bank, Birsa Bank, Bouri Bank, El Haouaria Bank, in the Sicily-Malta Hyblean carbonate platform flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment.

4) Some translations available online of the texts of the Temple of Edfu in Egypt;

5) the videos available online, in particular on Youtube, relating to the theories of Professor Sergio Frau and the geologist Mario Tozzi; these videos have helped and inspired me a lot, greatly enriching my basic culture on issues related to the research of Atlantis;

6) the text by Professor Marco Ciardi, Atlantis A scientific controversy from Colombo to Darwin, Carocci editore, Rome, 1st edition, November 2002; in particular, after studying Ciardi’s text, I understood thatthe texts of Timaeus and Critias contradicted the biblical chronology. An amanuensis writer who had translated these two passages would have asked his superior: “The Bible says that the world originated around 4000 BC: how is it possible that the Sardo-Corsican island dates back to 9600 BC?”. Faced with a moral dilemma that contradicted the Catholic Church, more or less as happened with Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei, and the publication of Descartes’ “Mondo”, probably the only acceptable solution was to undermine the credibility of the text conclusive, so that the date of 9600 was not considered valid or reliable by the known texts. The Romans, for their part, to counter the old name of the Mediterranean Sea, which in the past was called the Atlantic Sea or Atlantic Ocean, called it “Mare Nostrum”:

7) among the sources provided by linguistics and glottology, some videos, in particular present on youtube, on the works of Professor Salvatore Dedola relating to the Sardinian language and toponymy; newspaper articles and web pages dealing with the links between Sardinian, Corsican, Sicilian, Basque, Albanian and Romanian languages ​​and dialects; the works explained in various youtube videos by Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu; the ideas explained in some web pages on the linguistic affinities between the Sardinian languages ​​and that of the Basque population, when treated by Professor Juan Martin Elexpuru. Basically, some scholars have already noticed the linguistic and genetic commonality of other peoples with the Sardinian one, but they had not been able to understand and justify the cause. Some have even understood the reverse meaning,

8) a decisive role was played by my ability to imagine what had happened in the past. It was crucial to understand that if there are submerged structures in the Sicilian Channel, which could also contain the structures called Pillars of Hercules, as stated by Frau, then there are pieces of ancient history, protohistory and prehistory that have not yet been discovered nor clarified by the scientific community. This allowed me a certain strategic advantage over other scientists: the fact of having in hand scientific data not yet formalized by science, which I could use to interpret the past and to try to reconstruct it. For example, on the Sicily-Malta continental shelf there is a rectangular structure of about 8 km x 19.5 km. This structure, which I discovered and made public, does not yet have a name.

 

 

So not only the Corsican Sardinian Atlantis sank, but also the first Athens, which now, according to my interpretation, would be submerged in the submerged Hyblean carbonate platform Sicily Malta, bordered by the Sicily Malta escarpment, recently discovered by the scientific world and still in study and analysis phase.

9) another source I used is the analysis of toponymy. I’m no expert, I had to build my theory assumptions on assumptions. After realizing that Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican block, I wondered where the capital would be. And observing the satellite maps I realized that the Sulcis is made up of geological structures that recall portions of concentric circles, like the capital of Atlantis described by Plato. After re-reading the texts of Timaeus and Critias many times, I casually realized that in Sulcis, a region of present-day Sardinia, there were some toponyms that recall the Platonic story: many geographical localities of Sulcis in Sardinia (towns/towns/fractions /towns/cities) contain names related to the concept of cold water and hot water. However, these geographical locality names are in Sardinian dialect, so a foreign scientist who does not know the Sardinian language and its constellation of dialectal forms could never arrive at my same conclusions. I had the advantage of being born right next to Sulcis, so these toponyms are in my first mother tongue, i.e. Campidanese Sardinian or its very similar variants (the linguistic variant of Sulcitan Sardinian). Much of the toponymy of Sulcis recalls the story of Atlantis: Acqua Callentis (hot water); Acquafredda (cold water); Acquacadda (hot water); S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (the hot water above); S’Acqua Callenti de Basciu (the warm water below); the Castello di Acquafredda (castle of cold water); Furriadroxiu (the place where everything turns upside down); Spistiddatroxiu (the place where you get hurt); Piscinas (the swimming pools)… and who knows how many others. I then became aware that Sardinian toponymy had strong points in common with the Egyptian one: but once again, I’m not an Egyptologist, so building up all this information is an incredibly difficult job. I have just discovered, in recent days (19/03/2023) that some scholars have already noticed this incredible coincidence between Egyptian and Sardinian culture and toponymy on the following web page:

 

 

10) the archaeogenetic research carried out by scholars of various universities, including the University of Cagliari, from which it can be deduced that present-day Sardinia was inhabited even eleven thousand years ago; in particular, a video containing the news entitled “Su Carroppu” , enlightened me a lot in this regard. The Sardinian news program “Su Carroppu” explained online that archaeogenetic traces had been found of a Sardinian population with a genome almost completely different from that of the Neolithic populations that colonized the island about three thousand years later .

The description made during the brief viewing of this newscast enlightened my soul to the awareness that this population of eleven thousand years ago has characteristics that are perfectly congruent with the description of the Atlantean people: this people mainly preyed on marine resources; this population of eleven thousand years ago in Sardinia lived above all in the coastal area; lived in rock shelters or caves; so slowly I became aware that in the Sulcis there are various caves, and this was perfectly consistent with all my Atlantean theory. The caves of Acquacadda; the Is Zuddas caves; the caves of Neptune, located in Alghero in present-day Sardinia.

 

 

 

11) L’anomalia sismica causata dallo slab roll-back che avrebbe provocato l’affondamento del blocco geologico sardo-corso¹².

12) Le anomalie batimetriche che rivelano possibili costruzioni subacquee nel Mediterraneo¹.

13) La guerra tra Atlantide ed Atene finita nel 9600 a.C. descritta da Platone e confermata da alcuni ritrovamenti archeologici³.

 

Aggiornerò le fonti man mano che ricorderò da dove ho attinto per costruire la mia teoria su Atlantide sardo corsa.

ATLANTIDE COME CIVILTA’ ALTAMENTE SVILUPPATA E TECNOLOGICAMENTE AVANZATA.

When Plato describes the Sardo-Corsican Atlantean block as a highly developed and technologically advanced civilization, this sentence must be read in the context in which the Sardo-Corsican Atlantis existed, i.e. before its partial submersion in 9600 BC, i.e. about eleven thousand and six hundred years ago. However, many Plato readers, when they read the phrase “highly developed and technologically advanced”, believe that Plato refers to us who live in 2023 after Christ, so they believe that when we speak of technologically advanced population, they must have laser beams , teleportation, supercomputers equipped with super artificial intelligences… This mistake is made not only by many readers, but also by directors and writers; for example, the Disney animated film called Atlantis – The Lost Empire, shows that the inhabitants of Atlantis would have technologies such as flying motorcycles, with a system that appears to be anti-gravity. The Sardinian Corsican Atlantean theory instead states that the Atlantean population, which populated in particular the paleocoasts of the Sardinian Corsican block, today called by science with the name of “submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental platform”, was technologically advanced compared to the other populations of its time, i.e. those contemporary to her and who lived in the period prior to 11600 (eleven thousand and six hundred) years ago.

To give a clear example: on the wikipedia Chariot_(transport) page, we read that “The first chariot ascertained in Mesopotamian documents therefore dates back to 3000 BC,  found in a bas-relief in  Ur  called the  chariot of felines, in which the chariot made up of solid wheels with three sectors appeared, with integral axle and wheel and a pin fixed to a frame, which in the case of hearses, reached the size of 50 cm by 65 cm”. But in Plato’s descriptions, Atlantis had war chariots even before its submersion in 9600 BC. According to my Sardinian Corsican Atlantean theory, this is what “technologically advanced” means. The Atlanteans were experts in canalization, in making irrigation channels. This was advanced technology, compared to many other peoples, according to Plato, in 9600 BC and even before the sinking.

The Mass Media, unfortunately, and many occultists who have dealt with the Atlantis theme, have unfortunately contributed to inserting chaotic and confusing elements in the search for the submerged island, so even today many people expect that there are futuristic technologies in Atlantis even for us today, but this is simply a logical fallacy of reasoning.

ANALYSIS OF THEORIES ABOUT ATLANTIS THAT CONTRADICT MY THEORY

I cannot ignore the other interpretations of Plato and the historical and geographical evidences that contradict my hypothesis: therefore in this section I will deal precisely with this, that is to analyze the individual theories one by one and try to show the weak and strong points of each re-reading them in the light of my own peculiar interpretation. To do this, I will use the texts of the various authors and try to disassemble them piece by piece. This is not what I would like to do in life, but unfortunately I have to because I want to speed up the process of recognizing my potential discoveries.

 

 

In the Temple of Edfu the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian island, currently semi-submerged, is also called “The Primordial Island”, “Egg Island”, “Trampling Island”, “Combat Island”, “Island of Peace”; it is located in the “Eternal Lake” (the Eternal Lake is now called the Mediterranean Sea). The texts of the Timaeus and the Critias state things very similar to those written in hieroglyphics in the Temple of Edfu, using different words and circumlocutions. Combining this information together, it is possible to obtain new information on the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block.

 

Atlantis is the name given by the Egyptians to the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block when it was dry land, before its submersion/sinking around 9600 BC . It is effectively semi-submerged, as the Platonic historical account of Atlantis narrates, but two plateaus have remained out of the water, and our civilization has given them the name of “Sardinia” and “Corsica” . There was the “elephant species”, as Plato says, in fact there was the Mammuthus Lamarmorae .

The currently semi-submerged Sardo Corso Atlantide was the largest of all the islands; it was located in the center of the current Mediterranean, which was then called the sea of ​​Atlantis, or the Atlantic Ocean, called in later times with many names, among which the Egyptians will use “The Great Green”, “The Eternal Lake” to name a few. It was very heavily forested, and this is still true and valid. The climate was particularly mild, and this is still true today: in fact the sea has functions similar to those of a condenser in an electrical circuit: it dampens the hot climate by partially absorbing it, and mitigates the cold climates by releasing the previously accumulated heat. It was rich in minerals, and this is still true today, so we can imagine what the Sardinian-Corsican block must have been like over 11,600 years ago.
It was ancient for the ancients, and we have an infinite number of proofs: geology teaches us that Sardinian rocks are over half a billion years old. The tower builders lived there, and we know this for sure, so much so that an era has even been defined as “Nuragic”, and studied extensively enough to provide a great deal of valid scientific documentation. It must have been located beyond the Pillars of Hercules, and this too seems to be correct, after the findings I made in El Haouaria Bank and Birsa Bank.

 

The catastrophe mentioned by Plato must have been the geological phenomenon of partial submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, caused by the Slab Roll-Back, by the possible presence of a tectonic fault which passes under the Sulcis and continues, on one side towards Gibraltar and from the other towards Pompeii and Herculaneum, and visible using the satellite and bathymetric map of Google Maps, available free online. Also, the Meltwater Pulses also happened at that time in history. The era in which the Sardinian-Corsican block was called Atlantis was therefore before 9600 BC. The mud caused by marine erosion and currents made it impossible to sail along the island by ship, so the island probably remained unreachable for a few centuries, thus helping to make people forget the power of this warlike ancient people. Atlantis has a north-south orientation, as stated by Plato. The northern part is full of excellent winds for navigation, and in fact between Corsica and Sardinia there is one of the best sailing schools in Europe. The euhemeristic vision was correct: Poseidon was a very ancient ruler of the Sardinian-Corsican island when it was still dry land, then deified.

Why are there no archaeological or historical traces of such an advanced and powerful civilization in the Corsican Sardinian block? Because the population particularly preyed on marine resources, such as the two individuals found at the Su Carroppu rock shelter in Sirri, and to do so they lived on the Atlantean paleocoasts, today called the Sardinian Corsican Continental Platform. Part of the civilization and population that were located on the paleocoasts were submerged and then swept away by about eleven thousand and six hundred years of sea currents, which transformed the paleocoasts into a continental platform that now surrounds the Sardinian geological block. Furthermore, we know from experience that sedimentary deposits stratify over the years: for example, the Roman remains of about two thousand years ago are potentially found under a few meters of sediment and debris. Therefore, strictly speaking, if a scholar wanted to find the sedimentary layers that contain the remains of the Atlantean civilization, he would have to make a stratigraphic study that reaches the stratigraphy of 9600 BC, i.e. the layer of about 11600 years ago.

The rock shelter Su Carroppu has returned the DNA of two individuals out of three, of a population with almost entirely different DNA from the DNA of the population that subsequently colonized the island of Sardinia three thousand years later. Therefore, we can temporarily hypothesize that the two individuals analyzed at Su Carroppu di Sirri are of Atlantean population. From this hypothesis, it can be deduced that the Atlanteans, in addition to plundering marine resources and living in the paleocoasts, lived in caves or in rock shelters. Various very ancient caves are concentrated in Sulcis: the caves of Is Zuddas; the cave of Acquacadda; and other caves that I am currently unable to list, but may slowly be added to this list. Therefore, in order to disprove my theory, it would be enough to carry out stratigraphic analyzes in these caves, to prove that they were not inhabited in 9600 BC or before. Indeed Plato states that the Atlantean catastrophe dates back nine thousand years before Solon’s journey to Sais in Egypt, and this journey took place approximately in 590 BC. From these statements, another very important question can also be answered, given below.

If the Atlantean civilization was as advanced and powerful as Plato says, it should have left traces on the mainland as well, not just on the paleocoasts. And in fact, in my opinion, he left the traces in the caves around the plateau of Atlantis which now emerges from the sea and which has been called, by our civilization, with the name of Sardinia. In fact, remains from about 20,000 years ago were found in the Lanaittu cave, and this is perfectly consistent with the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis theory. Atlantis was also inhabited 20,000 years ago. Indeed, at present it seems that Sardinia was inhabited since at least 300,000 years ago. That’s why Plato says it was “ancient for the ancients”. And this would also be why the priest of the goddess Neith in Sais told Solon that the Greeks were never old, they were young men, and that their mythology was very much like children’s fairy tales. The priest was trying to explain to Solon that the Greeks had lost the memory of what happened between the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis and the first Athens, because the survivors were not literate and could not write and pass on the memory of what happened around 9600 BC .

Tutto quanto affermato è coerente, come deve essere una corretta teoria scientifica. Quindi le tracce degli Atlantidei, dotati di differente dna già classificato dagli studi archeogenetici compiuti dal Dipartimento di Preistoria dell’Università di Cagliari insieme all’Università di Firenze e Ferrara e pubblicati su Scientific Report, devono essere cercate nei ripari sottoroccia di tutta la Sardegna e Corsica e nelle grotte sparse in queste due isole, che in realtà sono altopiani emersi fuori dal mare dell’isola sottostante di Atlantide. Atlantide era uno dei nomi che gli Egizi davano a quest’isola, che nelle mura del tempio di Edfu in Egitto è chiamata anche Isola del Calpestio, Isola della Guerra, Isola della Pace, Isola dell’Uovo etc. Rileggendo e analizzando i testi del tempio di Edfu in questa chiave, è possibile ottenere nuove informazioni su Atlantide e le sue origini, che sembrano radicarsi nella mitologia Egizia.

Come si spiega il fatto che Platone descrive Atlantide come un’isola circolare con un canale navigabile al centro e una serie di anelli concentrici di terra e acqua, mentre il blocco sardo-corso ha una forma irregolare e non presenta queste caratteristiche? Perché la descrizione ad anelli riguarda non tutto il blocco sardo corso atlantideo, ma solo la capitale di Atlantide, l’attuale Sulcis. Come ho precedentemente spiegato, nel Sulcis è presente una struttura quasi circolare, delle dimensioni indicate da Platone, ma dopo undicimila e seicento anni di pioggie, allagamenti, motti tettonici causati dalla struttura a graben-horst del Sulcis, e motti tettonici causati dalla struttura a Sinkholes del Sulcis, hanno fatto si che queste porzioni di terreni, che presentano le strutture antichissime segnalate da Platone, come il Tempio di Poseidone, si sono spostate dalla loro posizione originale. Per cui occorre una seria e rigorosa indagine stratigrafica. Io non sono né archeologo, né stratigrafo, né geologo, non sono quindi in grado di occuparmi in prima persona di questa analisi. Credo però di aver fornito un potenziale importante contributo alla ricerca con tutte queste informazioni.

Ci sono prove di un contatto tra gli Egizi e gli abitanti dell’altopiano atlantideo chiamato Sardegna: esistono infatti almeno circa 300 reperti archeologici che gli studiosi definiscono “egittizzanti”. In questi giorni è stato stretto un accordo siglato dalla Direttrice Luana Toniolo e dal Direttore della fondazione museo delle antichità egizie di Torino, Christian Greco, per lo studio e l’analisi di questi reperti.

 

Platone descriva Atlantide come un’isola più grande della Libia e dell’Asia insieme: questo è possibilissimo, in quanto al momento attuale noi non sappiamo quale fosse la dimensione esatta della Libia e dell’Asia nel 9600 Avanti Cristo. Quindi potremmo procedere con un ragionamento inverso: supponendo che Platone abbia riportato fonti egizie autentiche e veritiere, possiamo dedurne quindi che nel 9600 a.C. la Libia e l’Asia erano due zone geografiche che coprivano un’area geografica inferiore a quella coperta dal blocco geologico sardo-corso attualmente sommerso sotto il Mediterraneo. Inoltre la Libia del 9600 a.C. potrebbe non corrispondere affatto con la libia attuale né con il concetto di “Africa”. Anzi, le scoperte fatte da Luigi Usai in Birsa Bank, El Haouaria Bank, nella Piattaforma continentale carbonatica iblea Sicilia-Malta, fiancheggiata dal Sicily-Malta Escarpment, mostrano vastissimi territori attualmente sconosciuti all’archeologia ed alla storia ufficiale, per cui la Comunità Scientifica deve ancora chiarire di che civiltà scomparse si tratti, se si tratti effettivamente di edifici e città sommerse; quali civiltà siano; perché sono sommerse; quando sono state sommerse, a causa di quali eventi. Insomma, le nuove scoperte sui fondali del Mediterraneo aprono scenari estremamente interessanti ed innovativi.

Come mai non ci siano prove archeologiche concrete della sua esistenza nel blocco sardo-corso? Perché gli archeologi sardi si sono fermati ad analizzare gli strati fino al nuragico; al momento attuale sembrerebbe che nessuno abbia scavato fino agli strati stratigrafici del 9600 avanti Cristo, rendendo quindi impossibile avere le prove archeologiche, che quindi non sono mai state cercate, in quanto il mondo accademico sardo, nella sua quasi totale interezza, credeva che Atlantide fosse frutto della fantasia di Platone, come affermano vari archeologi in moltissimi video e testi pubblicati online, ad esempio al Seminario chiamato “Sa Mesa Archeotunda”.

POSSIBILITA’ DEL RITROVAMENTO DELL’ANTICA ATENE DEL 9600 AVANTI CRISTO

 

Sulla piattaforma continentale sommersa carbonatica Iblea Sicilia-Malta, fiancheggiata dal Sicily-Malta Escarpment, il Dr. Luigi Usai (lo scrivente) ha ritrovato una struttura perfettamente rettangolare su quelle che sembrano essere le paleocoste mesolitiche della Sicilia orientale attualmente sommersa. Ad una più accurata analisi, si è potuto constatare la presenza di strutture dalle forme perfettamente geometriche, che appaiono di natura antropica. Maggiori studi sono necessari per la comprensione; tuttavia, è già possibile consultare le immagini online di questo possibile ritrovamento archeologico.

Video della potenziale scoperta:

 

HYPOTHESIS ON THE FIRST ATHENS SUBMERGED AROUND 9600 BC TOGETHER WITH ATLANTIS

If what Plato said about Atlantis is indeed a historical event, as stated in Timaeus and Critias, then one could speculate that this is the first Athens, submerged in 9600 BC. If this turns out to be true, everything Plato said has an objective confirmation in the real world. Of course it would be very strange for the First Athens to be based in Sicily. The important point to underline is that there seems to be a lot of objective evidence: bathymetry is a science. So bathymetric maps are also part of the tools that can be used by the scientific method. Some scholars have underlined that sometimes “artifacts” appear on the seabed, caused by bad data acquisition. However, after about 20 years in the IT sector, I have sufficient knowledge of the facts to establish that the possibility of these artifacts being erroneous is extremely low, otherwise I would have had to find rectangles in other parts of the world, which has never happened, not even exploring the depths of the world for two years consecutive approx. The submerged rectangle is also present in a point that appears to be the Mesolithic palaeocoast, so it is even more probable that it is a truly existing anthropic structure. Also, the resolution has changed and improved over the past year. If it were an artifact, the new detections should have erased the error and overwritten it with the correct data, but this hasn’t happened yet. not even exploring the seabed around the world for about two consecutive years. The submerged rectangle is also present in a point that appears to be the Mesolithic palaeocoast, so it is even more probable that it is a truly existing anthropic structure. Also, the resolution has changed and improved over the past year. If it were an artifact, the new detections should have erased the error and overwritten it with the correct data, but this hasn’t happened yet. not even exploring the seabed around the world for about two consecutive years. The submerged rectangle is also present in a point that appears to be the Mesolithic palaeocoast, so it is even more probable that it is a truly existing anthropic structure. Also, the resolution has changed and improved over the past year. If it were an artifact, the new detections should have erased the error and overwritten it with the correct data, but this hasn’t happened yet.

    

TOPONYMY AND NAME DAY

In the Sardinian-Corsican block the toponymy, very useful to archaeologists, clearly recalls the sources of hot and cold water placed according to the Platonic story on the Island of Atlantis by Poseidon: there are fractions of villages called “Acquacadda” (hot water , in Sardinian Campidanese ), S’acqua callenti de basciu (The hot water below, in Campidanese Sardinian) and S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (The hot water above, in Campidanese Sardinian dialect), while in the nearby town of Siliqua it is the cold water source of Zinnigas is still present today; in Siliqua the “ Castello d’Acquafredda ” is all that remains of the medieval citadel of Acquafredda. In short, even toponymy recalls the Platonic myth. Furthermore, Solon heard the story in the Egyptian city of Sais , and Sais  is also the name of a geographical fraction near Narcao: localities of lower Is Sais and upper Is Sais of Narcao (SU), in Sulcis in present-day Sardinia; it is also a Sardinian surname . The toponymy reappears in an apparently correct way, and precisely in the same geographical points (Sulcis, in present-day Sardinia) where the toponymy recalls the sources placed by Poseidon. And curiously, still in Sulcis, there is a locality called Piscinas … another toponymy that recalls the theme of water or flooding. While in relation to Egyptian toponymy, we find a place called “Terresoli ” (Land of the Sun, in Campidanese Sardinian dialect) which closely reminds us of Heliopolis (City of the Sun). As the Sulcis “s’esti furriau”, they called a fraction ” Furriadroxiu “; as many people died or were seriously injured, they called it “ Spistiddatroxiu “. In Sardinia we have Olbia , and Olbia also exists in ancient Egypt . At this point it is still difficult to prove, but the town of Sinnai in Sardinia could be related to Sinai in Egypt: this statement remains to be proved, but it no longer seems to be a coincidence: in-depth studies of the sector are needed. Carnac in France is famous for its megaliths, as is Karnak in Egypt. The name of the city is the same, but the phonetics are expressed with different consonant values, where K and C have the same semantic meaning, but different spelling.

We have seen the surname Sais , but the surname Usai is also interesting: the Usai mummy exists in Bologna , which demonstrates the contacts between the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean population and ancient Egypt. In fact, Usai is an exclusively Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean surname: all over the world, anyone called Usai is of Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean origins . So we have the presence of Sardinian-Corsican surnames in Ancient Egypt, and this should make us reflect. Furthermore, an engraving of an Egyptian boat was found in the Necropolis of Montessu in Santadi , in Sulcis. This further confirms the relations between Egypt and Sulcis of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block .Uras is a Sardinian surname and a Sardinian city . Together with the Mummia Usai, in Bologna, there are rooms with small bronzes, and the Nuragic small bronzes are known to all Sardinians . Abis is a Sardinian surname, Abis is a toponym from ancient Egypt. Olbia is a Sardinian city, Olbia is a city in Egypt. Uras is a Sardinian surname, Urasit is a Sardinian locality, and contains the theme of “Uranus”, which could be related to Poseidon. Toponymy and Onomastics, therefore, confirm the Platonic myth and also the relations with the Egyptians. The Egyptian finds are also found in other places in Sardinia, but here, for the moment, we will remain focused on the Atlantean theme.

It is difficult to explain in a few words, I will do it in another context: the Sumerians, the Akkadians and the Babylonians , with very high probability, were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations in times that scientists will now have to recalculate on the basis of the new discoveries. It will be difficult and wonderful, having to go over all the texts all over again and try to figure it out. However, I can give you some insights: there are probably links between the Sardinian surname Cadelanu , Candelanu and Kandalanu, a Neo-Babylonian king ; between the village of Sarroch in Sardinia and Dur- Sharrukinof Nineveh; these discoveries open the door to a new type of approach with the Sumerian and Mesopotamian culture in general.
Atlantis was bigger than Libya and Asia put together: now, by inverse procedure, we can deduce the size of these two geographical realities in about 9600 BC. The people who boldly advanced and wanted to conquer all the peoples who lived beyond the Pillars of Hercules, therefore, were the Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans who inhabited the Sardinian-Corsican geological block when it was still dry land, before the submersion in about 9600 BC. The whole of Sulcis (Sulcis is a geographical area of ​​lower Sardinia, west of Cagliari) is very rich in Atlantean toponymy: Acquacadda ,Acquafredda (city that disappeared in the Middle Ages), Acquafredda Castle , S’Acqua Callenti de Susu , S’Acqua Callenti de Baxiu , Acqua Callentis (another fraction that means Hot Water ), over three thousand and two hundred Sardinian toponyms just by looking for the portion of the word ” funt” (“funti” or “fonti” means “source” in at least one of the Sardinian variants). It is possible to cross-check my statements with Google Maps and with the Sardinian database of regional toponyms, as well as in the ways you deem appropriate.

In fact, Plato narrates that the island of Atlantis was rich in water. And in fact the world famous Sardinian linguist Salvatore Dedola (a super genius that you absolutely have to study in depth, together with Bartolomeo Porcheddu, another extraordinary scholar ) shows that Sassari, Thatari (Sardinian name of Sassari) and Serramanna, to give just one example, mean “Rich in Waters”. Toponymy and onomastics confirm the Platonic myth. It will be necessary to open sectoral studies to bring new information to those collected and demonstrated so far, and it is necessary that they be done by professionals in the sector.

SARDINIAN Oddities CORSO ATLANTIDEE

Regarding the Gadirica area, it is possible that it was not the name of Gadir (Cádiz), but of a homonymous geographical area of ​​the Sardinian-Corsican block, now submerged. Why would it have the same name as Gadir? For the same reason that Teulada in Sardinia has the equivalent Teulada in Spain ; Pula has a Pula in Dalmatia ; Aritzo in Sardinia corresponds to Aritzu in Spain ; Monastir in Sardinia corresponds to Monastir in Tunisia , Alguier (Alghero) corresponds to Algiers in Algeria , the fraction Su Vaticanu of Santadi corresponds to the Vatican in Rome , Pompu in Sardinia corresponds to Pompeii , Bari corresponds to Bari Sardo, and I could go on and on, but I risk boring you. For this reason, Gadir della Gadirica, in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, would correspond with Gadir (ie Cadiz) .

 

PLATONIC MEASUREMENTS

Prendendo la diagonale maggiore che seca il blocco sardo-corso-atlantideo, si ottiene che misura 555 Kilometri circa; questa misura appare, calcolata in stadi, nelle misure fornite da Crizia per descrivere l’isola. Se si esclude “la fascia dei monti che cadono direttamente sul mare” (ossia i monti ora presenti in Corsica e il lato destro della Sardegna come il Gennargentu), misurando il perimetro di forma rettangolare del territorio rimanente attualmente semisommerso, esso è maggiore di 10.000 stadi esattamente come affermato da Platone. E’ possibile quindi che la Comunità Scientifica proceda alle misurazioni indipendenti per verificare la veridicità di queste affermazioni.

 

IL TIMEO NON PARLA SOLO DI ASTRONOMIA, MA ANCHE DI GEOLOGIA

Riassumendo per chiarezza: i sacerdoti della città di Sais in Egitto stavano cercando, a modo loro, di spiegare a Solone un evento geologico di sommersione del blocco geologico sardo-corso al centro del Mediterraneo, mare che nel 9600 a.C. era chiamato Oceano Atlantico o Mare Atlantico (prendeva il nome dall’isola di Atlantide, la più grande tra tutte prima che finisse semisommersa). Atlantide era quindi anche più grande della Sicilia, che adesso, dopo il suo affondamento, risulta essere l’isola più grande, e non la Sardegna.

Dunque il periodo dell’affondamento sarebbe intorno, approssimativamente, al 9600 a.C., diversamente dall’ipotesi dell’Atlantide sardo nuragica, che è palesemente errata anche per i motivi   elencati in altre sedi dagli archeologi sardi.

Le analisi stratigrafiche devono scendere nel terreno fino a trovare i resti di 11.600 anni fa circa, per poter trovare i resti della “capitale” di Atlantide o della sua popolazione, ed è anche chiarissimo il motivo per il quale non si trovano corpi dei deceduti atlantidei negli strati del nuragico.

 

COLONNE D’ERCOLE NEL CANALE DI SICILIA: NUOVI RITROVAMENTI ARCHEOLOGICI

Frau (2002), che ringrazio di cuore per i suoi contributi straordinari alla disciplina, pone le Colonne d’Ercole tra Sicilia e Tunisia. In effetti, esiste la possibilità che queste siano state ritrovate. Infatti, la Comunità Scientifica di tutto il mondo è in fase di analisi della recentissima scoperta di quelle che appaiono come strutture di natura antropica collocate proprio nel Canale di Sicilia, ritrovate tramite analisi batimetriche del Sistema Emodnet dell’Unione Europea, in Birsa Bank e El Haouaria Bank, esattamente tra Sicilia e Tunisia, ed a breve distanza da Pantelleria. E’ stato fatto un secondo ritrovamento anomalo dal punto di vista batimetrico, di an apparently rectangular structure in the Sicily-Malta continental carbonate platform , flanked by the Sicily-Malta Continental Escarpment (Sicily-Malta Escarpment for geologists) .

 

 

 

The scientific world has not yet expressed itself on the matter ; it is not even known whether studies are being carried out on this matter. 5 computerized and independent bathymetric systems were used, programmed and managed autonomously, which returned the same results, which suggests that these structures really exist on the seabed. The cost of a shipment, however, is prohibitive for a single individual, and it will be necessary to wait for the intervention of third parties.

 

THE MUD AROUND THE ISLAND OF ATLANTIS

Why then was all around the submerged Corsican Sardinian island full of mud that prevented navigation ? Because the sea currents, after the sinking of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, began to tear away layers of soil that emerged from the surface as Sardinia does now, creating over the millennia what geologists today call the Sardinian “continental platform”. run . As the sea currents “washed” away layers of soil, destroying all the inhabited centers and structures that had been built before 9600 BC on the Sardinian-Corsican coastal strips, the water was clouded by muddy materials, and this is clear and obvious to thought and reflection.

 

GENETICS

In Atlantis “there lived the oldest ones”, and we all know of the Corsican Sardinian centenarians , to the point that the Sardinian genetic code has not only been and is studied all over the world, but has even been stolen (see the theft of 25,000 test tubes with 17 suspects, following the theft of the DNA test tubes of the Sardinians which according to the press took place at the Genos Park of Perdasdefogu in August 2016). That the Sardinian-Corsican block is ancient for the ancients is obvious to educated scholars: just mention the discovery of a fragment of carapace of Arthropleura armata of the Carboniferous of Iglesias (PAS Museum – EA Martel of Carbonia) , but anyone interested can inquire at a paleontologist, above all the extraordinary Daniel Zoboli.It is therefore obvious that the learned Egyptians were able, from many details, to understand the antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican block , which they called Atlantis .

 

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE

The Temple of Horus in Edfu, Egypt: reinterpretation of the texts based on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm

In Egypt, in the city of Edfu , there is a temple entirely covered in hieroglyphs. There are various translations, difficult to make also because of the content: in fact, the majority of these texts tell of the origin of civilization, of the origin of the world .

The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm helps in deciphering these texts, helping to clarify the meaning of most of them; to understand better, however, it is necessary to provide the reader with some basic information which will then allow him to understand almost the entire text.

In the Temple of Edfu, the Mediterranean Sea is called “The Eternal Lake”, “The Eternal Lake” or “The primordial waters” . In the Eternal Lake there was an island that lay in the primordial waters, i.e. the Sardo-Corsican block when this was a single land above sea level, over 11,600 years ago, during the Pleistocene. This same island is called by Plato, in the dialogues entitled Timaeus and Critias, with the name of Atlantis. The historical account is the same, but a few different terms are used to describe the same things. By combining the texts of Timaeus and Critias with the information carved in the Temple of Edfu, it is possible to obtain further information useful for understanding the prehistoric past of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean island and its relations with the ancient Egyptian world.

Edfu texts can be viewed at this address:
https://books.google.it/books?id=7sdRAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=it#v=onepage&q=%22the%20island%20of%20creation%22&f=false

Since I didn’t know these texts, I will slowly begin to try to make them translatable by relying on all the information that has been provided to us by the Platonic texts and by new scientific discoveries of various kinds: archaeological, genetic, geographical, linguistic, etc.
For hieroglyphic writing analysis, I will make use of the typewriter available online here:
https://discoveringegypt.com/egyptian-hieroglyphic-writing/hieroglyphic-typewriter/

Cercherò di riscrivere i testi di Edfu provando a renderli più chiari per un cittadino contemporaneo, sostituendo tutti i termini antichi con quelli moderni. Ad esempio, al posto di “Lago Eterno” scriverò “Mar Mediterraneo”, al posto di “Isola dell’Uovo” scriverò “isola semisommersa sardo-corso-atlantidea”, e così via.

Il mondo primordiale degli Dei è un’isola (in geroglifico iw) coperta in parte da canne, che giaceva nel buio delle acque primordiali del Mediterraneo, occupata dagli abitanti mesolitici il cui DNA è stato analizzato in due individui su tre del riparo sotto roccia di Su Carroppu, nell’attuale Sardegna.

Questa popolazione era considerata divina, non è ancora chiaro il motivo. Forse perché erano culturalmente molto più avanti del resto della popolazione mondiale. Probabilmente conoscevano già un po’ di metallurgia nel mesolitico (devo ancora dimostrarlo) e questo era percepito dagli altri popoli come una caratteristica divina. Infatti, Nekhbet e altre divinità presentano nelle zampe il simbolo della metallurgia, che a mio avviso è anche il simbolo che gli Egizi usavano per indicare il Sulcis o la provenienza dal Sulcis minerario. Tra gli dei creatori, sembra che Ptah abbia un ruolo molto importante. Ora, al momento non è ancora chiaro se questo abbia a che fare con Poseidone. Allo stato attuale è ancora difficile da capire, sono costretto a studiare egittologia per tentare di capire i possibili collegamenti. Qualche informazione può essere ritrovata nella Pietra di Shabaka. I testi sulla creazione sono di tipo Heliopolitano o Hermopolitano, dalle rispettive città nei quali i testi sono stati trovati incisi sulle pareti. I primi faraoni egizi erano probabilmente abitanti del blocco sardocorso, ossia di quella che per gli Egizi era l’Isola Primordiale o Isola Uovo. Il sacerdote che parla a Solone in Timeo e Crizia, infatti, segnala che all’inizio i sardocorsoatlantidei avevano tentato arrogantemente di invadere tutto il Mediterraneo. Gobekli Tepe potrebbe essere una colonia sardocorso atlantidea prima della sommersione. La sommersione parziale dell’isola e la morte di milioni di abitanti, e la distruzione di molte città e opere d’arte deve essere stato un tremendo trauma per i coloni sardocorsi in Turchia. E infatti a Gobekli Tepe sono presenti incisioni che sembrano proprio segnalare la tremenda sventura accaduta intorno al 9600 a.C., quando l’isola venne parzialmente sommersa in modo devastante, “nel breve volgere di un giorno e una notte di terribili terremoti e diluvi”.

The myth continues: first is Atum, the god who hovers over the waters; then the pyramid-shaped hill appears from which the sun originated, and Atum climbed it. Atum was bisexual; he cried, and the tears became men and women. He gave birth, and Geb, the earth, male and lying down, and Nut, a woman clinging to him, were born. Atum made them separate from the air, Shu.

Atum hovering over the waters, is then taken up by the bible: “And the spirit hovered over the waters”, in Genesis, before creation. Geb and Nut had children: Isis, Osiris, Seth and Nephthys.

This is the myth of Heliopolis.

The Hermopolitan Egyptian Creation instead provides that the sun was born from a mound. And indeed, around the world, there has been at least one civilization that has built a disproportionate amount of burial mounds. Even in the US. This should at least make you think. Now, in Sulcis there is a structure made in this way, but I don’t know if it’s just a coincidence.

 

 

 

 

GEOGRAPHY

Plato affirms that from the Isle of Atlantis (which here proves to be the Corsican Sardinian block) it was possible to go to the surrounding islands and to what is truly the continent. This is perfectly true: from the Sardinian-Corsican block, when it was dry land, it is possible to go to the surrounding islands, and it is really located in the center of the Atlantic Ocean (the Mesolithic name for the Mediterranean).
We Sardinians on a linguistic level, fortunately, have still kept these ways of saying: ” Deppu andai in Continenti ” ( I have to go to the Continent), when we have to go to the Boot. This statement makes those who hear us Sardinians die laughing, but fortunately it helps us understand what Plato meant: linguistically, when the Sardinian-Corsican block was dry land, we Sardinians linguistically called the island “continent”. Leaving the island was “going to the continent, to another continent”. After the sinking, this linguistic use remained at the level of Sardinian dialects, so we say that “we are going to the continent”, astounding those who listen to us. Furthermore, the Sardinians call the Italians who live in the boot “The Continentals”, confirming what was written by Plato and said by the Egyptian high priest in Sais, Egypt, to Solon. Atlantologists (that is, scholars of Atlantis) up to now have interpreted the word “Continent” with the semantics currently in vogue; they have forgotten that in 9600 BC the word “continent” could have a semantic, pragmatic and semiotic different from the current one. So someone claims that America is a continent, and therefore America can be Atlantis. In my opinion these interpretations show the side to many criticisms, and appear very trivial in my eyes.

 

In short, all Platonic statements, if placed in the right context, are rational and explainable correctly. However, they require a certain mental humility, a certain “willingness to listen”. Since they are strong affirmations, which have consequences, they probably need a few months of reflection and meditation before they can be properly assimilated and digested. Incidentally, it’s been 2600 years (from the time of Solon) that no one understood what the island of Atlantis was, indeed, it was stated almost everywhere that Plato was exaggerating. With regards to the submersion/sinking of the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian island , this would be a geological problem, where I can only speculate. For example, there may be at least three concurrent causes: Meltwater Pulses, in particular the meltwater pulse 1b, also studied by NASA technicians. In addition, geological settlement movements due to what geological experts call ” slab roll-back “. Furthermore, it has even been hypothesized, but still being verified, that a tectonic fault passes under the Sulcis, the same one that passes under Pompeii and Herculaneum, arrives under the Sulcis and continues up to Gibraltar . In possible support of the thesis that Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican island partially submerged and its continental shelf currently submerged, we report here some scientific evidence.  On February 28, 2017, a study was published in the journal Scientific Reports of the Nature group which presents new archaeogenetic data. These data reinforce the archaeological evidence of the clear cultural discontinuity between the first inhabitants of the island, dating back to about 11,000 years ago, and the architects of its definitive population which occurred about 3,000 years later, with the arrival of the first farmers-breeders. . This important discovery is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from the skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia . At present, these remains represent the oldest evidence of human presence on the island. Now, from 9600 BC to today about 9600 + 2023 years have passed, i.e. 11623. The evidence cited above is precisely from 11000 years ago. A study was conducted on the clear cultural discontinuity between the first visitors to the island of Sardinia around 11,000 years ago and the architects of its stable and definitive population, which took place around 3,000 years later with the arrival of the first farmers-breeders. The study is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from the skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia, which represent the oldest direct evidence of human presence on the island. The study is part of the research project funded by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia on the history of the first Neolithic population of the island. The genetic sequences obtained were compared with ancient and modern data and revealed a large difference in the genetic variability of the current population of the island compared to the first humans who frequented it, with most of the genetic variability appearing to have been determined by the migratory flow of populations who introduced the productive economy starting from the most ancient Neolithic. The Mesolithic sequences of the Su Carroppu samples belong to the groups named J2b1 and I3, which have very low or low frequencies in Europe. The relevance of the scientific discovery stimulated the intensification of research in the key site of Su Carroppu, already investigated between the years 1960-1970 and currently the subject of systematic excavations directed by the University of Cagliari. Happy searching to all of you. If anyone is interested, the theory of Atlantis as the Sardinian-Corsican island and all of its continental shelf currently submerged, can also explain other things in a very intuitive way. For example, the Greeks and Romans probably thought that the submersion of the Corsican Sardinian geological block had been a punishment from the gods for the arrogant inhabitants, who “overbearingly attempted, in one fell swoop, to invade the lands on this side of the Colonne D’ Hercules (perhaps located in the current Birsa Bank, an apparently anthropized seamount below the Strait of Sicily, data scientifically verified through Emodnet bathymetries). First I tried to clarify the toponymy. Now we can try to clarify the onomastics: the Gods punished the Sardinian-Corsicans, called by the Egyptians “Atlanteans”, according to what was stated in the Platonic texts around 9600 BC, “crushing the Sardinian-Corsican island underfoot, and it sank” (the quotation mark is my hypothesis). And this is easily explained why the Greeks called Sardinia Ichnusa (footprint) and the Romans called it Sandalia (sandal imprint). Even the name is now very clear: they were Greeks and Romans who mocked Sardinia, which was what remained of the great Sardinian-Corsican power, which the Egyptians called “Atlantis” in the story given to Solon, who told it to Dropides, who spoke of it to grandpa Critias, who told him to grandson Critias, who told Socrates in the Platonic dialogues of Timaeus and Critias. If any reader wants to know the original history of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, before it sank around 9600 BC, he is obliged to read Timaeus and Critias, two texts written by the Greek Plato. All the rest of the texts published to date have done nothing but add entropy, chaos, confusion to the history of the Sardinian-Corsican block, as characters like Cayce or Madame Blavatsky, professional charlatans, used the Atlantis argument to money, publishing books full of lies and entertaining the curious, especially after they saw that Ignatius Donnelly’s book, entitled ATLANTIS: THE ANTEDILUVIAN WORLD, had had an incredible worldwide media coverage. Furthermore, cinema and television have introduced a lot of nonsense on the subject of Atlantis, so when we talk about this topic many have in mind pieces of films or cartoons or fantasy books that have nothing to do with it. what Plato said. Hence: the Greek name Ichnusa, and Latin Sandalia, confirm my hypothesis that the ancients thought that the gods punished the Sardinian-Corsican island by crushing it underfoot. There was still no geological science as we understand it today. Furthermore:the Wadati-Benioff tectonic fault that passes under Pompeii and Herculaneum, and which destroyed them, is probably the same that continues as far as the Sulcis in present-day Sardinia and continues until it reaches the current Strait of Gibraltar. Since this fault is activated in geological times, the citizens who live in the Sulcis are not aware of the seismic activity. When this releases its elastic energy, frightening disasters occur, such as the opening of the Strait of Gibraltar, the destruction of cities and places such as Pompeii and Herculaneum, or the submersion of the Sardo-Corsa island. But the submersion is probably also due to another very important cause: the geological settlement of the Sardinian-Corsican island following the “slab roll-back” which, as revealed to us by the ancient Egyptian priest, took place around 9600 BC. The Slab Roll-Back, concomitantly with the tectonic awakening of the fault present under the Sulcis and currently unknown to the official geology which instead knows a fault further south along Africa, and perhaps also due to the succession of various Meltwater Pulses after the Wurm glaciation, they caused the partial submersion of the Sardo Corsa island. Now,out of the water, only the tops of the mountains remained, which we now believe are separate islands, and which our civilization now knows by the names of Sardinia and Corsica. Furthermore, all the toponymy and onomastics present in Sulcis leave one question: why do all these Sulcis places recall Plato’s story? We will then be able to pick up the Platonic text again to try to understand why. First of all, if the Pillars of Hercules were located at Birsa Bank, and the Sardinian-Corsican island and its currently submerged continental shelf is really Atlantis, this means that in 9600 BC it was customary to call the current Mediterranean Sea with the name of Sea Atlantic (i.e. sea of ​​the island of Atlantis) or Atlantic Ocean (Ocean of the currently submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, i.e. Atlantis). I haven’t read Frau (2002) yet, so I don’t know if he has already published some of my statements, in which case I apologize in advance. Mine are only reflections resulting from the reasoning made in the last two years. Please let me know of any shortcomings or apparent plagiarism, thanks in advance. If all of this is true, then Poseidon was perhaps a man, and obviously not a deity (why, have you ever met one in person?), and this man fell in love with a teenage girl whose parents had died, Clito. The Platonic account states that Poseidon surrounded the hill with water channels. Now, just the Sulcis (but look what a coincidence! Or maybe it’s not a coincidence?) is volcanic in nature, so right in the center of the Sulcis there is a hill or mountain, if you like, not too high, and this is visible using satellite systems such as Google Maps or Google Earth, which even allows you to tilt the view by pressing the shift key on the computer keyboard. But are these places really ancient as Plato says or are they very recent places? Easy to verify: right in the center of Sulcis, you can verify that there are prehistoric IS ZUDDAS caves, and nearby there is ACQUACADDA (Poseidon put two sources there, one of cold water and one of hot water, and the locality is called Acquacadda …but look what an incredible coincidence!Of course I have imagination!) and very ancient archaeological finds have been found in the locality of Acquacadda. Now an expert might argue that the finds, for example, are only 6,000 years old. Note: an expert should look for the stratigraphic layers of 9600 BC: only then would it be possible to obtain more detailed information. Instead, currently, in these places groups of children are brought to watch. In my opinion this is dangerous but I’m not a stratigraphy specialist so I have no say in the matter. Also in Sulcis, the Su Benatzu cave was found, which is an authentic archaeological treasure, which could contribute to research on the topic “what happened in the millennia after the sinking of the Sardinian-Corso-Atlantean island?” (I have to develop this topic). Furthermore, in support of the theory of the submerged Sardinian-Corsa Atlantis, there is another scientific discovery of marine archeology: the discovery of a load of 39 ingots of orichalcum by the extraordinary Sebastiano Tusa off the coast of Gela, in Sicily. Newspaper articles speculate that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information about the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located a very short distance away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” which began about 40 million years ago, after the detachment of the from the present coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a grain of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if they turn out to be incorrect in the future). This is possible to know, as stated by the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi, because a great deal of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, which showed how the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Hispanic-French coasts. Furthermore, the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia has various types of Graben Horst may have also contributed to the possible submersion, so that these geological adjustments may also have contributed to important and significant telluric displacements for the Sardinian-Corso-Atlanteans people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Graben Horst. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens program by the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites at Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we have to verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated the Mediterranean also over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered on the Ocean (let us remember that we have already shown that Oceanus, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Mediterranean Sea, and not the current Atlantic Ocean ). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were linguistic influences as well? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages ​​and the Corsican language, Sicilian “dialect” (or should we say the language?) (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Siciliano. Correspondenze nel Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others),mainstream as no one imagined the enormous importance of this type of work, which shows to all intents and purposes that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean languages ​​have spread throughout the Mediterranean. And now, thinking about it, we can begin to understand that even in the study of languages ​​there has been an inversion: it was believed that Sardinian resembles Spanish and Portuguese because we have been “dominated” by them in recent history, while probably the Spanish and Portuguese languages, in reverse, were imposed by the prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean dominion of which, until now, we were not aware.New Sardinia has dedicated an article about it entitled: «That thread that binds Sardinians to Basques» by Paolo Curreli  in which an exceptional and ingenious linguist became aware of this Sardinian Corsican Atlantean linguistic heritage, and made it known to the world with his extraordinary works (from the article: “Hundreds of similar words in the study of Elexpuru Arregi. Many linguistic affinities . Two towns with the same names: Aritzo and Aritzu. But also Uri and Aristanus. The holly in Sardinian, galostiu, in Basque is gorostoi”). But Atlantidologists cannot arrive at these texts if no one shows their correlation with the theme of Atlantis. There is therefore still a lot of work to do, and this is just the beginning of a new era of studies. The peoples of the Corsican Sardinian block therefore influenced in prehistoric times the evolution of the current languages ​​and dialects and minority languages ​​of part of the Mediterranean and perhaps also of other places. Here is now explained in a very simple and crystalline way why the Sardinian, the Corsican, the Sicilian, the Basque, the Spanish, the Portuguese, the Veronese dialect (see for example all the names of asparagus, vegetables, etc. which are identical to those Sardinians) and who knows which others are so similar. Now that we have this information, we can resume the overtime work of theProfessor Bartolomeo Porcheddu   and confront your statements, which are now all perfectly correct and all not only explainable, but even understandable and obvious to reason. What Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu says is right and correct (in my eyes it is obvious, there is not even need to underline it, but in the interviews we sometimes get the impression that your theses are considered “fringe theories”, as if they were pseudo -science, while instead they are a demonstration of genius and intuition out of the ordinary). There are various sites that show how by now various scholars were already realizing the linguistic similarities between languages ​​and dialects of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and other languages ​​and dialects scattered around the Mediterranean in particular article. Yet another articlethat talks about it is this. In short, by now serious scholars were realizing that there was information we were not aware of, as if there really was an ancient civilization that was missing from the appeal of Ancient History, as Graham Hancock states: this civilization is the one that lived in the Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged, when this was an island and dry land: Graham Hancock was therefore right on this point. The impact of this extraordinary discovery creates a sort of shock in the scholar’s mind: in fact, now there is a sense of dephasing, of distrust. How is it possible that hardly anyone had ever noticed, if we exclude some brilliant scholars who have even been laughed at for their statements? How is it possible that Plato was not believed? Even Aristotle himself did not believe him: “He who dreamed of Atlantis also made it disappear”. In conclusion: the old Egyptian priest was telling Solon, around 590 BC, that the Greeks are a young people, as the men of letters cyclically died from the catastrophes that periodically occur on the planet, and therefore their opinions on the past were like fairy tales, because they had not fixed historical events in written language. The Egyptians, on the other hand, fixed information on stone, so they had memories of facts that had faded over time. And he doesn’t immediately tell him about Atlantis, he tells him about the first Athens, founded in about 9600 BC, that is 1000 years before the city of Sais in Egypt. At that time, the Greeks accomplished a most extraordinary feat of all: they managed to free all the peoples of the Mediterranean from the invasion of one people,

There are other discoveries to support the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis thesis, but searching for the material takes time and sacrifice. I will do my best to provide as much evidence as possible to all of you readers, archaeologists, journalists and scientists. It is important that all possible evidence is presented in order to be able to show you that these are not mere coincidences. A coincidence would be normal. Four as well. But when we bring 40+ coincidences to support, then maybe it’s not coincidences but potential evidence.
Prof. Sergio Frau (2002) realized that “ Sardinia is Atlantis“, mentre in realtà è un altopiano del blocco geologico sardo corso atlantideo, e ha quindi cercato di fare collimare l’Isola di Atlante con la Sardegna. Il problema è che la Sardegna è solo un sottoinsieme di Atlantide, quindi mancava tutta la piattaforma continentale sardocorsa, che attualmente è sommersa come dice il racconto platonico di Timeo e Crizia, e mancava all’appello la zona montuosa a nord dell’isola di Atlantide, la cui parte emersa è oggi chiamata “Corsica”. Inoltre, la Corsica è stata ceduta alla Francia complicando terribilmente ancora di più la ricerca: infatti gli esseri umani mentalmente, vedendo che una parte è italiana e una francese, istintivamente pensano che si tratti di due realtà differenti, mentre invece sono la stessa isola sommersa, come geologi di fama mondiale mi hanno già confermato di sapere. Ma i geologi chiamano questa isola sommersa millenni fa col nome di “blocco geologico sardo corso”, mentre il sacerdote egizio che ha narrato a Solone non poteva usare i termini “sardegna” e “corsica” che ancora non esistevano. Quindi gli archeologi, usando il metodo scientifico, hanno verificato le affermazioni di Frau, e si sono accorti che scientificamente i conti non tornavano, e hanno ragione. In realtà, avevano ragione sia Frau sia gli archeologi: Frau aveva ragione, in quanto la Sardegna è un sottoinsieme dell’Isola sardo corso atlantidea. Gli archeologi avevano ragione, in quanto la Sardegna è troppo piccola di dimensioni per essere Atlantide. Inoltre, la datazione data del nuragico purtroppo non era corretta, quindi giustamente veniva fatto osservare dai nostri scienziati. Ciò che lascia perplessi, magari, è il fatto che Atlantide è un’Isola sommersa, per cui: perché non sono mai state fatte vedere le batimetrie sommerse durante centinaia di incontri? Perché non si sono convocati degli esperti di batimetria? Questo probabilmente resterà un mistero per i prossimi anni a venire.  Mi farebbe piacere se ora gli archeologi  si esprimessero per correggere eventuali errori da me commessi nell’esprimere le mie idee. With this message I want to underline my profound esteem for all the scholars, archaeologists, geologists, researchers, journalists such as Sergio Frau and Graham Hancock, who have contributed to the worldwide search for truth. You all have my praise and my respect. Thank you for the work you have done and still do. World scientific research can only progress if every single citizen can give his contribution, even when he says nonsense: because a mistake in research doesn’t kill anyone, as long as the research then continues. And the important thing is that we stop tearing each other apart between scientists and researchers: our aim can be the serene search for truth, with serene dialogue. It is not serious if a citizen mistranslates the original Greek text. “We mustn’t hit him for this”: let’s try to focus on dialogue, discussion, and let’s stop waging war between factions of thought. “I don’t agree with what you say but I would give my life for you to say it” (phrase not by Voltaire, but by Evelyn Beatrice Hall). I await the response of the researchers to my statements on the currently semi-submerged Sardinian Corsican Atlantis.

If you really want to understand Atlantis: study the geology of the submerged Corsican Sardinian block. Studying the Sardinian dwarf elephants found in Sardinia, called Mammuthus Lamarmorae. When Plato writes that “the species of elephants was present” he is talking about this animal, not the Indian elephants. To understand Atlantis it is necessary to know the toponymy of Sulcis: “Poseidon put two springs there, one of cold water and one of hot water”. In fact, the Corsican Atlantean Sardinians called the towns of Sulcis with the following names: Acquafredda (which disappeared in the Middle Ages, but a Castle of Acquafredda remained in Siliqua), Acquacadda, S’acqua callenti de Susu, S’acqua callenti de Baxiu, Piscinas (perhaps following the submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block), the source of Zinnigas still exists, Upper Is Sais and Lower Is Sais (which probably gave their name to the city of Sais in Egypt where they told Solon of Atlantis). The Atlantean DNA has already been found and studied by Professor Carlo Lugliè, who has already SCIENTIFICALLY established that this population has a different DNA from that of the Neolithic people who populated Sardinia 3000 three thousand years later. Certain! If there was a catastrophe with the sinking of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, it is obvious that they died and a population with different DNA came later. In Sulcis Poseidon obviously loved caves. There were the caves of IS Zuddas and Acquacadda (here the theme of hot and cold water returns and therefore of the sources). But when he moved north, he probably went to the caves of Alghero, which the Romans still knew as Neptune’s Caves. But Neptune is the Latin name of Poseidon! So the caves of Neptune are the transfer location of this ancient ruler when he went to the north, probably to visit his sons. Until today, Poseidon / Neptune was thought to be a myth / legend, but he was a very ancient ruler, later deified. This fact is called “EVEMERISM”. I suggest to all readers that you take a look, to learn new things. If what I say is true, can I prove it somehow? If a person is intelligent he can deduce it in the following way. The Mammuthus Lamarmorae have so far been found in at least 3 locations: Funtanammari in Gonnesa, in Alghero where there is Neptune’s cave, and if I am not mistaken in the Sinis. In Alghero we have just said that there are the Grottoes of Neptune, therefore Poseidon used to go there, and they found the dwarf Sardinian mammoth. If you analyze the toponymy of Gonnesa, they found another dwarf mammoth of the elephant species in Funtanamari, which means “Fountain by the sea”. But the fountain is a source of water! Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists can’t go so far as to claim that the priest also taught him the Sardinian-Corsican language and the various Atlantean dialects. All those that I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Sardinian Corsican block currently half-submerged. Probably scholars, now, pretending to believe the things I say, will gradually begin to realize that I am right and that I am not lying. they found another dwarf mammoth of the elephant species in Funtanamari, which means “Fountain by the sea”. But the fountain is a source of water! Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists can’t go so far as to claim that the priest also taught him the Sardinian-Corsican language and the various Atlantean dialects. All those that I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Sardinian Corsican block currently half-submerged. Probably scholars, now, pretending to believe the things I say, will gradually begin to realize that I am right and that I am not lying. they found another dwarf mammoth of the elephant species in Funtanamari, which means “Fountain by the sea”. But the fountain is a source of water! Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists can’t go so far as to claim that the priest also taught him the Sardinian-Corsican language and the various Atlantean dialects. All those that I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Sardinian Corsican block currently half-submerged. Probably scholars, now, pretending to believe the things I say, will gradually begin to realize that I am right and that I am not lying. Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists can’t go so far as to claim that the priest also taught him the Sardinian-Corsican language and the various Atlantean dialects. All those that I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Sardinian Corsican block currently half-submerged. Probably scholars, now, pretending to believe the things I say, will gradually begin to realize that I am right and that I am not lying. Here is the theme of the island rich in water sources. Now, the Egyptian priest told Solon, around 590 BC, a lot of things, but archaeologists can’t go so far as to claim that the priest also taught him the Sardinian-Corsican language and the various Atlantean dialects. All those that I list are not coincidences: Atlantis is really the Sardinian Corsican block currently half-submerged. Probably scholars, now, pretending to believe the things I say, will gradually begin to realize that I am right and that I am not lying. Atlantis is indeed the currently half-submerged Corsican Sardinian block. Probably scholars, now, pretending to believe the things I say, will gradually begin to realize that I am right and that I am not lying. Atlantis is indeed the currently half-submerged Corsican Sardinian block. Probably scholars, now, pretending to believe the things I say, will gradually begin to realize that I am right and that I am not lying.
If Atlantis is really the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then some parts of prehistory and history will have to be rewritten from scratch. I leave this work to you. I’m not capable of it. For me it has already been a superhuman effort to be able to put order in the midst of all this mess. I don’t care about fame. In my opinion, Professor Ugas came close when speaking of the Atlantic coast of Africa, but in my opinion, to better understand it, he could re-examine the text by Marco Ciardi, when he speaks of Bailly (Ciardi M., Atlantis A scientific controversy from Colombo to Darwin, Carocci editore, Rome, 1st edition, November 2002, p.92-97): in practice a part of the Atlantean colony colonized the area indicated by Prof. Ugas, while Poseidon became the ruler of the now submerged Sardo-Corsican island. Attention! It is important to note that the currently submerged Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf is immense in size! That was an integral part of the island. 11,000 years of erosion by sea currents generated the mud that surrounded the island in the Platonic story, and this mud, settling, cleaned the waters of present-day Sardinia making them crystal clear. Furthermore, there is a very small desert in Sulcis. This desert is most likely artificial. Further studies will be needed to prove it, now I am unable to provide you with any other evidence. he cleaned the waters of what is now Sardinia making them crystalline. Furthermore, there is a very small desert in Sulcis. This desert is most likely artificial. Further studies will be needed to prove it, now I am unable to provide you with any other evidence. he cleaned the waters of what is now Sardinia making them crystalline. Furthermore, there is a very small desert in Sulcis. This desert is most likely artificial. Further studies will be needed to prove it, now I am unable to provide you with any other evidence.
I hope these posts of mine are interesting. If not, delete everything and leave it alone. I hope that out of hundreds of people, there are at least one or two who understand the importance of what I am doing.
I apologize if I have moments of anger: I am furious at the fact that the scientific world continues to insist on telling lies to listeners. It is not right that scientists and scholars spread lies. It’s unfair. It is unfair that a Sardinian/Corsica bathymetry expert has not been called. It is unfair that Prof. Carlo Lugliè was not called to question him on the truthfulness of what I said. It is unfair that no one EVEN NAMED the elephant species Mammuthus Lamarmorae. If you’ve never seen it, go to the Iglesias museum. But next time please talk about it.
For me it is a moral duty to make this information public.
For at least 2600 years no one has understood that the Timaeus is not only a text of astronomy, but also of geology, given that it deals with the geological sinking of the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean block.

For archaeologists : a paradigm shift is taking place , as explained in the book by Thomas Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions, how ideas of science change, Einaudi, Turin, 1969: I called it ” The Sardinian Corsican Atlantean paradigm”. Before, everyone believed that orbits were circular, following Aristotle as You follow Lilliu (in the style of “Ipse Dixit”, “Lilliu dixit”). Then they realized, after an infinite number of tests after tests, that the orbits are elliptical. Then another paradigm shift occurred: the Bible said that the earth was at the center of the Universe, and Copernicus said that the Sun was in the focus of its elliptical orbit. Galileo confirmed this, and they showed him the instruments of torture, which I hope you will not show me. But Bruno was burned alive, poor fellow. Now I ask you: give me the benefit of the doubt and cross-check my claims, please. It may take a long time, but you will understand that we are once again facing something extraordinary: a new paradigm shift. The island of Atlantis is the Egyptian name for the currently semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block, whose two plateaus emerging out of the water are now known by the names of Sardinia and Corsica. Prof. Carlo Lugliè can help you by explaining that the original Atlantean population, around 11,000 years ago, had a different DNA from the Neolithic people who populated it 3,000 years after the catastrophe, and lived above all by procuring marine resources, and for this reason, the Atlantean settlements they were located mainly on the coasts. It is for this reason that civilization has been almost totally wiped out: because they lived on the coasts and these were submerged “in the short span of a day and a night of terrible earthquakes and floods”. Today science calls the Atlantean paleocoasts with the name of “Sardinian-Corsican continental shelf”. Furthermore, there have been 11,000 years of sea currents eroding and destroying coastal structures. Perhaps it is impossible to still find the remains of this civilization. Furthermore, the Andreotti Government has allowed the United States to set up a nuclear submarine base at La Maddalena, so the Americans had at least half a century to make their raids with submarines in our waters, before the Superintendencies woke up and understood what was happening. And since the Americans are clever, they have set up a “military base” right in Teulada, in Sulcis. But look, what a coincidence… Fantarcheology? Dear Superintendencies, where are your submarines for coastal exploration? Where are your thousands of reports on the Sardinian seabed? Where are the 3D bathymetries of the seabed? Or maybe nobody made them? And where are the letters to the Ministers, asking to obtain these things? To obtain funding by explaining its immense importance for the history of human civilization? If Corsican Sardinian Atlantis sank around 9600 BC, why are you wasting your breath and energy looking for Atlantis in the Nuragic layers? Once the existence of Atlantis with Sulcis as its capital is taken for granted, one has a precise idea of ​​where to look for the structures described by Plato. to ask to get these things? To obtain funding by explaining its immense importance for the history of human civilization? If Corsican Sardinian Atlantis sank around 9600 BC, why are you wasting your breath and energy looking for Atlantis in the Nuragic layers? Once the existence of Atlantis with Sulcis as its capital is taken for granted, one has a precise idea of ​​where to look for the structures described by Plato. to ask to get these things? To obtain funding by explaining its immense importance for the history of human civilization? If Corsican Sardinian Atlantis sank around 9600 BC, why are you wasting your breath and energy looking for Atlantis in the Nuragic layers? Once the existence of Atlantis with Sulcis as its capital is taken for granted, one has a precise idea of ​​where to look for the structures described by Plato. https://www.atlantisfound.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Capitale-di-Atlantide-Luigi-Usai-17-febbraio-2023-pulita.png Prof. Ugas can confirm that the dimensions coincide perfectly with what Plato said, also the distance of the capital from the sea, about 8.8 kilometers. Perhaps the problem is that the structures could also be 100 meters underground, because at first glance it seems that they have been submerged by mountains of earth (this needs to be verified, but it is understandable to the eye). Salvatore Dedola is a genius: he noticed the incredible overlap between Sardinian and Babylonian, Sumerian and Akkadian names. “There was a Paleo-Neolithic linguistic coenosis”. It is all right! The linguistic coenosis was caused by the Atlantean people of the Sardinian coast, i.e. the same inhabitants whose DNA has already been analyzed in two individuals out of three of the rock shelter of Su Carroppu. The Sardo-Corsican Atlanteans migrated to the Mediterranean. And these migrations would explain the Cretan civilization which worshiped the bull, which had the Labrys, it would explain the highly evolved culture and the engraving of Poseidon’s trident found on the Palace of Knossos; and it would explain why the Sardinian ingots are found in Crete, in Cyprus, and why there is Akrotiri in Cyprus and there is a second Akrotiri in Santorini, where an evolved civilization lived that even had toilets and pipes… It would explain why on Mount Carmel they then found structures from the Nuragic era. It would explain why Atlit-Yam, Pavlopetri, Herakleion/Thonis, Baia and who knows how many others that you haven’t even found yet… And it would also explain why Atlit-Yam had that name, since perhaps Atlantis was the mother island from which they had migrated…Since Atlantis had laws (the orichalcum column engraved with the laws, on the top of which they poured bull’s blood? Sound familiar?), is it not surprising that the descendants then created the Code of Hammurabi, strengthened by the legal knowledge developed in the previous millennia on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block. Give me the benefit of the doubt for just a moment. The Romans sought the Damnatio Memoriae for Atlantis. They subdued them, perhaps stripped the Neptune Caves of the little material that perhaps still remained, but they continued to call them by their name. In short, they knew Poseidon/Neptune, for them he was still a historical figure. At this point it wouldn’t surprise me if names related to Atlantis had been banned, and maybe Atlas has become Antas, which could clarify the toponym S’Antadi. I haven’t been able to research this and I’m absolutely not capable of it. and S’Antadi also appears in Sant’Antonio di Santadi (but look what an incredible coincidence? The Americans have set up a military base here too… but what a strange coincidence… and then in Perdas de Fogu there is another military base, just where they stole the DNA of the inhabitants… what a strange coincidence… but of course I’m imaginative, huh? How about?) At the military base of the La Maddalena submarines, the Americans brought, hear hear… moles to create tunnels among the largest in the world then existing. Why? Why were the Americans interested in digging huge tunnels in and around La Maddalena? What were they looking for underground? Had they seen any kind of metal via satellite (can be done)? I understand if they carry a missile, if they carry other materials useful for military purposes, but what about moles to dig tunnels? Perhaps it may be interesting to analyze where military bases are located to extract other useful information. Nuclear submarines for the Mediterranean? Just halfway between Sardinia and Corsica? There were incidents, and the newspapers once reported that the submarine was right in Teulada.

To learn more:

• the Atlantean name Gadiro, translated into Greek as Eumelo (reminiscent of Emilio);
• the relations between Karnak and Carnac;
• the Gadirica area and the exact location of the Columns: El Haouaria bank?
• are all the Gadiros therefore Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans?: starting from this hypothesis, find all the Gadiros mentioned in the official ancient history (one was Cretan; one was a poet; one won the Olympic Games competing with the foals brought to the funeral of Patroclus; find others);
• The presence of Sardinian toponyms that include the Sardinian divinities Corso Atlantis Isis and Horo (Oro): see the toponyms with Isidoro –> there is the possibility that the adoration of Isidoro was later Christianized in Sant’Isidoro. Note the presence of the same toponymy in Tenerife, a Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean colony.
• Further study to be done, on “mitza” Sardinian meaning -> means source, pool of water, as in the Platonic myth. It has a similar meaning in the Hebrew language, which is Semitic like Sardinian. I have the impression that the Jewish people in search of the promised land were nothing more than a portion of Sardinian peoples who migrated to Egypt in search of a land that would not sink, unlike the Sardinian block that was sinking. And this sinking, known only in remote times, every x thousand years, with the partial sinkings, is the same one that quoted Montezuma, stating that his ancestors came from the Atlantic Ocean (that is, the Mediterranean before 9600 BC), leaving a perfect land that was sinking though.
• The Cretans were Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean migrations –> Another reflection for archaeologists: why have I never heard any scholar make comparisons between the Minotaur and Su Boe Erchitu and Su Boe Muliache ? Why has no one ever pointed out that the minotaur is a Sardinian-Corsican mythological figure ? Look for the images of these characters online and you will understand that the minotaur is probably nothing more than an ancient Sardinian belief / legend, revived in Crete . The Minoans were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations to Crete; as you know, Evans chose the word “Minoans” arbitrarily. There is also the androcephalic or bronze bull of Nule , which does nothing but confirm all these statements. Su Boe Erchitu is a legendary creature of Sardinian popular tradition . This is not to be confused with Su Boe Muliache, another Sardinian legendary creature .I’m not saying I’m really right. I’m saying: why don’t we try to explore other avenues of thought? Why don’t we look for other kinds of solutions to unsolved problems? I hope these sentences of mine are understood for what they are: it is obvious that I am not a specialist; my proposal to scholars is to be open to examining possibilities that until now had been excluded a priori. Again, I invite you to re-examine the toponymy of Sulcis, because all those names of towns that refer to the Platonic myth are too strange: in Carbonia there is a hamlet called “Acqua Callentis”; in Nuxis “S’acqua callenti de Basciu”, S’Acqua callenti de Susu; the medieval town of Acquafredda disappeared, which left the castle of Acquafredda; the source of Zinnigas; and there are even links to Egyptian toponymy: Heliopolis (city of the sun) and in Sulcis Terr’e Soli (land of the sun, Terresoli). Sais in Egypt and Is Sais Inferiore and Is Sais Superiore in Sulcis. In short, in my opinion this toponymy should be seriously taken into consideration by a self-respecting scholar. I can also understand that perhaps no one had noticed until now, but now that I have made the information public, in my opinion it may be worthwhile for some scholars to start treading these new unexplored paths.
• The last few days I realized that Cabras is a surname, it is the name of a town; it is the locality where they found the Giants of Mont’e Prama; and I thought: “Cabras in Sardinian means goats”; this name can even date back to the Paleolithic! Immediately afterwards I thought: “I wonder if there was an ancient village called Brebeis”, which means “sheep” in Sardinian. I thought these things about 2 days ago. Just now, examining the Sulcis, I realized that there is the Is Brebeis pond, Stagno Le Pecore, right in the Sulcis . Crazy: it seems that my theories have a match in the real world, everything now seems to have a deep and even intuitive meaning. I had never heard of this Is Brebeis pond before…

 

If the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis theory were true and scientifically proven , there would be many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view. Here are some examples:

1. Scientific : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could stimulate new scientific research to better understand this civilization and its impact on the ancient world. New excavation and study campaigns may be required to explore the submerged ruins and ancient artifacts.
2. Historical : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could change the way we view ancient history. More research may be needed to better understand how this civilization developed and how it interacted with other Mediterranean cultures.
3. Anthropological : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new information on the cultural exchanges between the different civilizations of the ancient Mediterranean. More research may be needed to better understand how these cultures interacted with each other and how they influenced each other’s traditions and customs.
4. Cultural : The legend of Atlantis has fascinated people for centuries and the discovery of its true location could inspire new works of art and literature. New stories, poems, paintings and sculptures representing this lost civilization could be created.
5. Linguistic : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new information on the diffusion of languages ​​in the ancient Mediterranean. More research may be needed to better understand how these languages ​​spread among different Mediterranean cultures.
6. Trade : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could suggest the existence of unknown trade routes between the different cultures of the Mediterranean. More research may be needed to better understand how these routes worked and how they influenced the diffusion of ideas and innovations.
7. Philosophical : The legend of Atlantis has been passed down from the ancient Greeks and the discovery of its true location could provide new perspectives on ancient Greek philosophy. More research may be needed to better understand how the ancient Greeks incorporated the legend of Atlantis into their philosophical musings.

In general, if the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis theory were true and scientifically proven, it would have many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view.

Colonie Sardo Corso Atlantidee before the submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block

Among the best known Sardinian Corsican Atlantean colonies before the submersion of the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean geological block, there are the structures found in Turkey of Gobekli Tepe, Karan Tepe and other similar ones still being analyzed today. Reconstructing this information is extremely difficult, but we could try to do it, starting for example from the symbols. The structure with concentric circles should by now be known as a reference to the structure of Sulcis, where the ancient Sardinian-Corsican ruler Poseidon set up residence together with Clito, on a hill/hill near Santadi and Sant’Anna Arresi. Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe present Atlantean structures called Taulas (tables), in the shape of a T, which the Atlanteans had also built on the island of Menorca. The Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Mesolithic symbolism is present in Turkey in the various Tepes excavated so far, as they include the Bull sacred to the Atlanteans, and the vulture. The Atlantean vulture, represented in Turkey, will then be represented among the people of Egypt with the sacred representation of Mut and Nekhbet. In particular, the Egyptians, to clarify that they were speaking of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, placed the symbol of the Metallurgy of Sulcis in the claws of Nekhbet, which we show in the image immediately below:

The Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans built the Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe structures as a demonstration of their technological advancement and architectural skills, and this had great cultural significance for them. Their behavior could not go unnoticed, and showed other populations new ways of living, new behaviors, new religions. There was an ongoing cultural exchange between different civilizations and populations. This also explains why the Taulas of Menorca are also present in Gobekli Tepe. To clarify all these oddities, a paradigm shift was needed, which we will call the Sardinian Corso Atlantide Paradigm, which manages to clarify many hitherto obscure aspects of the archaeological and anthropological past.

 

CRITICISM OF ATLANTIS SARDO CORSA

 

SAFEGUARDING DISCOVERY AND PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE

I would like to point out that I have done everything to make this data public and disclose it, but I have hit a brick wallboth from the Superintendencies, who never replied to my emails or my pecs, and from the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, which never replied to my emails or my pecs, and from various university professors and archaeologists whom I contacted privately. I was told that “The scientific community proper does not exist”, or that “they do not disclose the discoveries of other scholars”. In practice, if an ordinary citizen makes a potential discovery, he is not provided with any support to communicate it to the scientific world. There is the expectation that an inexperienced person, who has never done it before, creates a perfect scientific paper from scratch, with all the trappings, and delivers it to I don’t know who for publication and analysis by the scientific community. In my opinion this is a shameful thing. I would have expected help in first trying to arrange my claims in an understandable way, and then in disseminating for analysis and cross-checking the veracity of the claims. Same attitude from the publishing houses: they would have published the book, but only after the scientists had confirmed my statements.

The Superintendencies and at least one Ministry of the Italian Government have never replied to my pecs (certified e-mail with equivalent value to Registered Mail with Return Receipt) where I reported the discovery within 24 hours as per current legislation on the procurement of Archaeological or Cultural Heritage. Maybe they thought it was a joke .

Therefore:

1) I distrust them publicly ;

2) based on current legislation, I have a legal and moral duty to protect and safeguard the findings made : I made the news public to prevent the discovery and the findings from being ruined in recent years (damaged, sabotaged, stolen, illegally exported, destroyed by incompetent people such as inexperienced construction personnel carrying out field maneuvers etc.) due to State mismanagement of finds. In fact, by law I would have the obligation of silence, to be entitled to the economic percentage on the discovery. But in this case, my conscience requires me to make the news public because in my opinion it isState officials who are supposed to protect the discovery and the findings (cultural assets, treasures, works of art, artifacts, ports, villages, boats, etc.), are currently endangering it with their apparent indifference.

 

Some Data/Information used in this website was made available by the EMODnet Human Activities project and Emodnet, www.emodnet-humanactivities.eu, funded by the European Commission Directorate General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

On the basis of current legislation, considering the animus derelinquendi towards the corpus derelictionis, I declare the find and/or the objects present therein Res Nullius and Res Derelicta, except for different regulatory provisions which will be evaluated from time to time with the competent Authorities.